M ICHEL L. L APIDUS
The Feynman integral and Feynman’s operational calculus : a heuristic and mathematical introduction
Annales mathématiques Blaise Pascal, tome 3, n
o1 (1996), p. 89-102
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AMBP_1996__3_1_89_0>
© Annales mathématiques Blaise Pascal, 1996, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales mathématiques Blaise Pascal » (http://
math.univ-bpclermont.fr/ambp/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
THE FEYNMAN INTEGRAL AND FEYNMAN’S OPERATIONAL CALCULUS: A HEURISTIC
AND MATHEMATICAL INTRODUCTION
Michel L.
LAPIDUS1
Résumé. Nous donnons une courte introduction
heuristique
au calculopérationnel
de
Feynman
pour desopérateurs qui
ne commutent pas. Nous discutonségalement (tout
aussibrièvement)
uneapproche mathématique
de ce calculopérationnel dévelop- pée
en collaboration avec Gerald W. Johnson. Cefaisant,
nousévoquons quelques-
uns des liens entre ce
sujet
et lesintégrales
deFeynman
de laphysique quantique.
En
particulier,
la notiond’intégrale
deFeynman analytique
et desopérations
non-commutatives convenables sur certaines
algèbres
de fonctionnelles de Wiener(ap- pelées "algèbres
dedémêlement") jouent
ici un rôle essentiel. Le lecteur intéressé pourra trouver une discussionbeaucoup plus approfondie
de cesujet
dans leschapitres
14 à 19 du livre "TheFeynman Integral
andFeynman’s Operational
Cal-culus"
[JoLa5]
par G. W. Johnson etl’auteur,
àparaitre
chezOxford University
Press.
Abstract. We
provide
a short heuristic introduction toFeynman’s operational
calculus for
noncommuting operators,
as well as discussbriefly
a mathematical ap-proach
to thissubject developed by
Gerald W. Johnson and the author. We also evoke some of the connections between thistopic
and the"Feynman path integrals"
from
quantum physics.
Inparticular, analytic (operator-valued) Feynman path
in-tegrals, along
with(suitable)
noncommutativeoperations
on certainalgebras
ofWiener functionals
(called "disentangling algebras"), play a prominent
role in thiscontext. The interested reader can find a much more
thorough
discussion of these and relateddevelopments
inChapters
14through
19 of the bookby
G. W. John-son and the author entitled "The
Feynman Integral
andFeynman’s Operational
Calculus"
[JoLa5],
to bepublished by Oxford University
Press.A la mémoire d’Albert
Badrikian,
homme de culture et mathématicienchevrortne,
collègue
et amiOur
goal
in this paper is two-fold:first,
in Section1,
toprovide
a short heuristicintroduction to
Feynman’s operational
calculus fornoncommuting
operators[Fe2].
Then,
in Section2,
togive
a very brief discussion of a mathematicalapproach
tothis
calculus,
asdeveloped originally by
G. W. Johnson and the authorby
meanslResearch partially supported by the US National Science Foundation.
This work was presented in a plenary lecture at the Symposium "Calcul Stochastique en
Dimension Infinie" held in September 1995 at the Université Blaise Pascal (Clermont-Ferrand II), France, in memory of Professor Albert BADRIKIAN.
of
analytic (operator-valued) Feynman path integrals
and suitable noncommutativeoperations
on"disentangling algebras"
of Wiener functionals([JoLal-4]
and[JoLa5,
esp.
Chaps. 14-19]). (See
also[Lal-6]
for related worksand,
for more recentdevelopments, [dFJoLal-2], [JeJo].)
1.
Feynman’s Operational
Calculus: HeuristicApproach
In his 1951 paper, entitled "An
operator
calculushaving applications
inquantum electrodynamics" [Fe2], Feynman suggested
to construct a functional calculus fornoncommuting
operators which may in some sense be viewed as ageneralized
kindof
(or
else a substitutefor) path integration.
Moreprecisely,
to thisaim,
heproposed
to use the
following
heuristic rules:(1) (Feynman’s Time-Ordering Convention.)
Attach "time indices" to the oper- ators involved tospecify
the order ofoperations
inproducts.
Hence,
if A and B aregiven (possibly noncommuting) operators, then "Feyn-
man’s
time-ordering
convention" can be stated as follows: ’f BA, if 81 s2,
(1.1)
:=AB,
if s2 sr,~ undefined, if si
even
though
A and B themselves may be timeindependent.
(2)
With these time indicesattached,
form functions of these operatorsby
treat-ing
them as ifthey
werecommuting.
[So that,
in(1.1),
forexample, A(si)B(s2)
= =BA, provided
thatsi
s2.]
(3) (Disentangling Process.) Finally,
return to the real world where operatorsdo not commute in
general: "disentangle"
theresulting expressions;
thatis,
restorethe conventional
ordering
of theoperators.
Feynman [Fe2,
p.1 10]
says of thedisentangling
process involved inStep
3: "Theprocess is not
always
easy toperform,
and infact
is the centralproblem of
thisoperator
calculus."We now illustrate these "rules"
by
a verysimple example.
We writesuccessively:
"A . B" =
(10 A(s1)ds1) (10 B(s2)ds2)
=
[0,1] [0,
1]A(s1)B(s2)ds1ds2
=
0s1
s21 A(s1)B(s2)ds1ds2
+
/ / A(s1)B(s2)ds1ds2
0s2 si
1=
s1
s2BAds1ds2
+s2s1 ABds1ds2
(1.2)
=1 2BA
+1 2AB
.
=
~ ~’~~ ~
’where,
of course, we have usedFeynman’s time-ordering
convention(1.I)
in thesecond to last
equality.
In
summary,
(l .3)
"A . B" =(10 A(s1)ds1) (10 B(s2)ds2)
=1 2(AB
+BA),
the anti-commutator of A and B.
More
sophisticated examples
lead to various kinds of "time-orderedperturbation
series" , For instance, we
give explicitly (but
without furtherexplanation)
the firsttwo terms of such a series
resulting
from the"disentangling"
of the formalexpression
"exp{-tA + t0B(s)ds}",
for some t > 0(for
moredetails,
see[JoLa5, Chap. 14]
or the introduction to
[dF JoLa2]):
exp( -tA + t0 B(s)ds)
=
0
/ exp(- (t - s)A)B(s) exp(-sA)ds
,
+
/
s2texp(-(t - s2)A)B(s2) exp(-(s2 - s1)A)B(s1)ds1ds2 (1.4)
+’" .
Let us now
specialize
to A =iHo (
whereHo = -1 20394
denotes the free Hamilton-ian)
and B = -iV(where
V =V(s,.)
is themultiplication operator by
abounded, possibly time-dependent potential
function V : xRd ~ R),
with i =-1.
Then the full time-ordered
exponential
seriescorresponding
to( 1.4)
isnothing
butthe "classical
Dyson
series"[Dy]
encountered in theperturbative approach
to quan-tum mechanics and
quantum electrodynamics. (See,
e.g.,[GIJa], [Si], [JoLal]
andthe references
therein.)
A number of
"generalized Dyson
series"(GDS)--possessing
often a much morecomplex
combinatorial structure-are obtained in therigorous approach
toFeyn-
man’s
operational
calculusdeveloped
in([JoLa1-5], [Lal-5], [dFJoLa1-2]),
and tobe
briefly
discussed in the next section.(See especially Chapters 15,
17 and 19 in[JoLa5].)
Many "paradoxical formulas" (as
we like to callthem)
appear in the context ofFeynman’s operational
calculus. Forexample,
the moststriking
such formula isgiven by
(1.5a) exp(A
+B)
=exp(A) . exp(B)
or rather
(1.5b) exp {10 A(s)ds+ 10 B(s)ds}
= exp{10 A(s)ds} { exp(
,which every student of linear differential
equations quickly
learns to be wrong.Naturally,
such formulas must be taken with agrain
of salt.However,
in ourjoint
work
[JoLa3,4],
we haveproposed "deforming"
certain commutativeoperations (on
the space of Wiener
functionals)
into noncommutative ones in order toreintepret rigorously (1.5)
and other"paradoxical
formulas".(See
also[JoLa5, Chap. 18].)
In
closing
thissection,
we should stress thatFeynman’s original
paper on thissubject [Fe2]
is not easy toread; probably
less so(to
mostreaders,
atleast)
thanhis
celebrated
paper[Fel]
on the"Feynman path integral".
It is veryrich
in ideas but is also in need of further clarifications and mathematicaldevelopments.
In-deed, Feynman
himself wrote[Fe2,
p.108]
about hisoperational
calculus: "The mathematics is notcompletely satisfactory.
Noattempt
has been made to maintainmathematical
rigor.
The excuse is not that it isexpected
thatrigorous
demonstm-tions can be
easily supplied. Quite
thecontrary,
it is believed that to put thepresent
methods on arigorous
basis may bequite
adifficult task, beyond
the abilitiesof
theauthor".
The above
quote
may besurprising
to the reader familiar with some ofFeynman’s
other statements
regarding mathematics,
asreported
in the press orprinted
in someof his own books or articles.
However,
as the author couldverify during
a numberof
private conversations-including
the initial oneduring
whichFeynman urged
him to further
develop mathematically
hisoperational
calculus-he wascompletely
sincere in this
quote.
It was apleasure
for me tobegin
to carry out this program afew years
later, jointly
with my friend and(now) long-term collaborator,
Gerald W.Johnson. Of course, many intricate
problems
remain to be tackled andeventually
to be solved in this area.
2.
Feynman’s Operational Calculus,
theFeynman Integral,
andDisentangling Algebras
We will
briefly
discuss in this section some of outjoint
work with Gerald W.Johnson on
Feynman’s operational
calculus fornoncommuting operators [JoLal-5],
as well as related work of the author
[Lal-6]
and further extensions(also joint
withB.
DeFacio)
to more abstractsettings [dFJoLal-2].
We define a(commutative)
Banach
algebra At (indexed by time t)
of Wiener functionals Fsuch
that the associatedanalytic operator-valued Feynman integral (e.g., [CaSt], [JoSk], (JoLal])
can be"disentangled"
via time-orderedperturbation expansions,
calledgeneralized Dyson
series(GDS,
inshort).
These series(which
can be visualizedby
means of certain
generalized Feynman diagrams)
have a rich combinatorial structure due to the presence ofLebesgue-Stieltjes
measures with nonzero discretepart,
inthe definition of the functional F.
(See [JoLal]
or[JoLa5, Chaps.
15and 16].)
Theuse of such measures enables us to blend continuous and discrete structures as well
as to
unify
knownphenomena
and discover new ones.More
specifically,
for A >0,
the operatorKt (F)
isgiven by
a bonafide
Wienerintegral.
It is then definedby analytic
continuation to the openright-half plane
Re A >
0,
followedby strong continuity
for Rea > 0,
A > 0( i.
e.,by
passage to the limitalong
theimaginary axis).
Of course, in view of the well-known no go theorem of Cameron[Ca] establishing
the nonexistence of"Feynman’s measure", Kt03BB(F)
is no
longer given by
aWiener-type
functionalintegral
for nonreal values of theparameter
A.Nevertheless,
for all A E C with Rea > 0, a ~ 0,
the(bounded linear)
operator Ki (F)
is stillgiven (or "disentangled" ) by
the aforementioned GDS.(We
note that
probabilistically, 03BB-1/2
can bethought
of as a "diffusionconstant",
fora>0.)
In the
terminology
of([JoLal-5], [Lal-5]),
thequantum-mechanical (or Feynman)
case
corresponds
to A = -i(or A purely imaginary),
whereas theprobabilistic (or diffusion)
casecorresponds
to A = 1(or
A >0).
[For
measure-theoretic reasons, the commutative Banachalgebras At
consist of(suitable) equivalence
classes of Wienerfunctionals,
where theequivalence
relation[JoSk]
isassociated
to thescale-change corresponding
to differentpositive
values ofthe
parameter
A.Further,
the naturaloperations
within eachalgebra At correspond
to the usual addition and
multiplication
of Borel measurable functions on Wienerspace.] ]
We also introduce
(in [JoLa3, 4])
noncommutativeoperations
on the space of Wiener functionals(namely,
a noncommutativemultiplication
* and addition4-)
and on the aforementioned
"disentangling algebras" At (t
>0)
such that if F E,AE1
and G E
,Atz,
then F * G E(as
well asF+G
EAt1+t2)
and(for Re 03BB
>0,
(2.1)
*G)
=K~1 (F)K~ (G).
Further,
under the sameassumptions,
we have forexample,
(2.2a) exp(F+G)
=exp(F) * exp(G)
’and
hence, by (2.1 ) .
(2.2b)
=As was alluded to in Section
1,
we may use formula(2.2)
togive
arigorous
inter-pretation of Feynman’s "paradoxical
formula"(1.5). (See
also[JoLa5, Chap. I8~.)
Note that in
(2.2a) [which
isformally
identical to(1.5a)]
we are nowworking
at thelevel of the functionals
(rather
than of theoperators)
and havereplaced
the usual(commutative) operations by
new noncommutative ones.Intuitively,
one may think of therelationship
between the operator and the functional F asanalogous
to that between a
pseudodifferential operator
and itssymbol. (Naturally,
one canuse
similarly Equation (2.1) along
with theproperties
of the noncommutative mul-tiplication
and addition tojustify (and reinterpret) other "paradoxical
formulas"in
[Fe2],
as well as new ones.We also discuss
closely
related work of the author[La2-5]
onthe "Feynman-
Kac
formula
with aLebesgue-Stieltjes
measure" in which we determine both in the diffusion and in thequantum-mechanical
case, theintegral equation,
the distribu- tional differentialequation
and thecorresponding product integral representation,
associated with the
(generalized) Feynman-Kac
functionalwhere r~ is an
arbitrary Lebesgue-Stieltjes
measure on the time interval~0, t).
.If we write ~ = + 03BD,
where p
is continuous( i.
e., "diffuse" or"nonatomic" )
andv is discrete
(possibly
an infinite linear combination of Dirac measures thenwe can
analyze precisely
the effectof
and v on the solution of the differential(or integral) equation.
Inparticular,
the(unique, bounded)
solution is shown to have(multiplicative)
time-discontinuities at each instant Tp in thesupport
of the discretepart v
of r~.Physically,
these can beinterpreted
in thequantum-mechanical
case as"instantaneous
interactions",
"shocks" or"scatterings" occurring
atprecisely
thosetimes
(see [La3]). (The integral equation
is derived in[La2,3]
or[La4],
when v isfinitely supported
or in thegeneral
case,respectively,
while the associated distribu- tionalequation
and aproduct integral representation
of the solution are obtained in[La5].
We stress that the time-orderedperturbation
series(GDS)
obtained in[JoLal]
were crucial in the derivation of theseresults, especially
in thequantum-
mechanical case where a standard functionalintegral representation
is nolonger available.)
We also refer to[JoLa5, Chap. 17]
for further discussion of thistopic,
as well as of its
relationship
withvarious
aspects ofFeynman’s operational
calculus.An
attempt
tocapture
the essence of thealgebraic
andanalytical
structuresunderlying
the construction(carried
out in[JoLal,4])
of+, *),
thefamily
of
"disentangling algebras" equipped
with its noncommutativeoperations +
and *,is made in
[La6],
where apossible
set of axioms for(parts of) Feynman’s operational
calculus is
proposed.
Thecounterpart
of themapping
F ~ is then viewed as a"quantization map"
defined via a kind of"generalized (Feynman) path integral".
The
difficulty is,
of course, to construct such a map in each concrete situation(as
was done in
[JoLal-4]
in asetting corresponding
toordinary quantum mechanics).
We also
briefly
mention more recent work[dFJoLal,2] (joint
with G. W. Johnsonand B.
DeFacio)
in which wedetermine,
inparticular,
the evolutionequation (in integrated form)
associated with theexponential
of sums ofnoncommuting
opera- tors. Thesetting
of[dFJoLa2]
is moregeneral (in
somerespects) than,
forexample,
in
([JoLal-4], [Lal-5])
because we now deal with(suitable)
abstract operators inHilbert spaces and thus no
underlying path integral
is then assumed(or
even avail-able). (An
abstract measure-theoretic result[BaJoYo]-due
to AlbertBadrikian,
G. W. Johnson and
Yoo,
andextending
that of Johnson in[Jo]-is
used in thesetting
of[dFJoLa]
in order tosimplify
ourhypotheses.)
Inaddition,
the workin
[dFJoLa2]
seems toprovide
a suitable theoretical framework to understand the efficient use ofperturbation
series associated with "nonlocalpotentials"
inphe- nomelogical
nuclearphysics (as studied,
e.g., in[ChSa], [McC], [Ta]).
Aspects
of theapproach
in[dFJoLa]
are extended(in
differentdirections)
in theworks in
preparation ([Re], [JeJo]).
It ishoped
that future research(probably joint
with B. Jefferies and G. W.
Johnson)
will enable us to combine the basic features of([JoLa], [dFJoLaL [JeJo])
in order to construct the above noncommutative oper- ations4-
and * in this moregeneral framework,
andthereby provide
afairly general
’class
ofexamples
for whichFeynman’s operational
calculus can be carried out in this manner.Other works
dealing
with variousaspects
ofFeynman’s operational
calculus-but
using
rather differentapproaches
from those described here-include([Ma],
[Ne], [Ar], [Gi], [GiZa]).
The content of this paper is the
subject
ofChapters
14through
19 of a book inpreparation by
G. W. Johnson and M. L.Lapidus,
entitled "TheFeynman Integral
and
Feynman’s Operational Calculus" ,
to bepublished by
OxfordUniversity
Pressin the Oxford Mathematical
Monographs
Series~JoLa5~.
The interested reader canalso find in other parts of
[JoLa5]
a morethorough
discussion of severalapproaches
to the
Feynman path integral, using
eitherprobabilistic
oroperator-theoretic
tech-niques.
References
[Ar] Araki,
H.Expansionals
in Banachalgebras,
Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm.Sup.
6(1973), 67-84.
[BaJoYo] Badrikian, A., Johnson,
G. W. andYoo, Il,
Thecomposition of operator-valued
measurable
functions is measurable,
Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 123(1995),
1815-1820.
[Ca] Cameron,
R.H., A family of integrals serving
to connect the Wiener andFeyn-
man
integrals,
J. Math andPhysics
39(1960),
126-140.[Cast] Cameron,
R. H. andStorvick,
D.A.,
Anoperator-valued function
spaceintegral
and a related
integral equation,
J. Math. Mech. 18(1968), 517-552.
[ChSa] Chadan,
K. andSabatier,
P.C.,
Inverse Problems inQuantum Scattering Theory (1989),
2nded., Springer-Verlag,
New York.[dFJoLa1] DeFacio, B., Johnson,
G. W. andLapidus,
M.L., Feynman’s operational
calculusas a
generalized path integral,
in Stochastic Processes: AFestschrift
in Honourof Gopinath Kallianpur,
S. Cambanis et al.(eds), Springer-Verlag,
NewYork,
1993,
pp. 51-60.[dFJoLa2]
_____,Feynman’s operational
calculus and evolutionequations. Preprint IHES/M/95/54,
Institut des Hautes EtudesScientifiques, Bures-sur-Yvette, France,
1995
(80 pages). (To
appear in ActaApplicandae Mathematicae.)
[Dy] Dyson,
F.J.,
The radiation theoriesof Tomonaga, Schwinger
andFeynman, Phys.
Rev. 75(1949),
486-502.[Fe1] Feynman,
R.P., Space-time approach to
non-relativistic quantummechanics,
Rev. Modern
Phys.
20(1948),
367-387.[Fe2]
_____, An operator calculushaving applications
in quantumelectrodynamics, Phys.
Rev. 84(1951),
108-128.[Gi] Gill,
T.L.,
Time-orderedoperators
I &II,
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 266(1981), 161-181
& 289(1983),
617-634.[GiZa] Gill,
T. L. andZachary,
W.W.,
Time-orderedoperators
andFeynman-Dyson algebras,
J. Math.Phys.
28(1987), 1459-1470.
[GlJa] Glimm,
J. andJaffe, A., Quantum Physics:
a FunctionalIntegral
Pointof View, Springer-Verlag,
NewYork, 1981.
[JeJo] Jefferies,
B. andJohnson,
G.W.,
Functional calculifor noncommuting operators,
in prep.[Jo] Johnson,
G.W.,
Theproduct of strong operator
measurablefunctions
isstrong operator measurable,
Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 117(1993), 1097-1104.
[JoLa1] Johnson,
G. W. andLapidus,
M.L.,
GeneralizedDyson series, generalized Feynman diagrams,
theFeynman integral
andFeynman’s operational calculus,
Memoirs Amer. Math. Soc. 62(1986), 1-78.
[JoLa2]
_____,Feynman’s operational caculus, generalized Dyson
series and theFeyn-
man
integral,
in"Operator Algebras
and MathematicalPhysics"
P. E. T. Jor-gensen and P.
Muhly (eds.), Contemporary Mathematics,
Vol.62,
Amer. Math.Soc., Providence, 1987,
pp. 437-445.[JoLa3]
_____, Unemultiplication
non commutative desfonctionnelles
de Wiener etle calcul
opérationnel
deFeynman,
C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 304(1987),
523-526.[JoLa4]
_____, Noncommutativeoperations
on Wienerfunctionals
andFeynman’s operational calculus,
J. Funct. Anal. 81(1988),
74-99.[JoLa5]
_____, TheFeynman Integral
andFeynman’s Operational Calculus,
OxfordMathematical
Monographs,
Oxford Univ.Press,
Oxford and NewYork,
to ap- pear.[JoSk] Johnson,
G. W. andSkoug,
D.L.,
TheCameron- Storvick function
spaceintegral:
an
L(Lp, Lp,) theory, Nagoya
Math. J. 60(1976), 93-137.
[La1] Lapidus,
M.L.,
Formule de Trotter et CalculCpérationnel
deFeynman,
Thèsede Doctorat d’Etat ès
Sciences, Mathématiques.
Université Pierre et Marie Curie(Paris VI), Paris, France,
1986.(Part
I: Formules de Trotter etIntégrales
deFeynman.
Part III: CalculOpérationnel
deFeynman.)
[La2]
_____, Thedifferential equation for
theFeynman-Kac
Formula with aLebesgue- Stieltjes
measure, Lett. Math.Phys.
11(1986), 1-13.
[La3]
_____, TheFeynman-Kac formula
with aLebesgue-Stieltjes
measureand Feynman’s operational calculus,
Stud.Appl.
Math. 76(1987),
93-132.[La4]
_____, TheFeynman-Kac formula
with aLebesgue-Stieltjes
measure: an inte-gral equation in
thegeneral
case,Integral Equations Operator Theory
12(1989),
162-210.
[La5]
_____,Strong product integration of
measures and theFeynman-Kac formula
with a
Lebesgue-Stieltjes
measure, in Proc. Sherbrooke Conference onFunctional
Integration, Supp.
Rend. Circ. Mat.Palermo,
Ser. II 17(1987),
pp. 271-312.[La6]
_____,Quantification,
calculopérationnel
deFeynman axiomatique
etintégrale fonctionnelle généralisée,
C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I 308(1989), 133-138.
[Ma] Maslov,
V.P., Operational Methods, English
transl.(Rev.
from the 1973 Rus-sian
ed.), Moscow, Mir,
1976.[McC] McCarthy,
I.E.,
Introduction to NuclearTheory, Wiley
andSons,
NewYork,
1968.
[Ne] Nelson, E., Operants:
afunctional
calculusfor non-commuting operators,
in Proc. Conf. in Honor of MarshallStone,
F. E. Browder(ed.), Springer-Verlag,
New
York, 1970,
pp. 172-187.[Re] Reyes,
J.T., Thesis, Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln,
in prep.[Si] Simon, B.,
FunctionalIntegration
andQuantum Physics,
AcademicPress,
NewYork, 1979.
[Ta] Tabakin, F.,
Aneffective
interactionfor
nuclear Hartree-Fockcalculations,
An-nals
Phys. (N. Y.)
30(1964),
51-64.MICHEL L. LAPIDUS .
University of California
Department of
Mathematics .Sproul
HallRiverside,
CA 9~5~1-Ol ,~5 .U. S. A.
e-mail address: