C OMPOSITIO M ATHEMATICA
B RUNO C HIARELLOTTO
G ILLES C HRISTOL
On overconvergent isocrystals and F - isocrystals of rank one
Compositio Mathematica, tome 100, n
o1 (1996), p. 77-99
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=CM_1996__100_1_77_0>
© Foundation Compositio Mathematica, 1996, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Compositio Mathematica » (http:
//http://www.compositio.nl/) implique l’accord avec les conditions gé- nérales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisa- tion commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une in- fraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
On overconvergent isocrystals and F-isocrystals of
rank
oneBRUNO
CHIARELLOTTO1
and GILLESCHRISTOL2 1 Dipartimento
di Matematica, Università, Via Belzoni 7, 35100 Padova, Italy 2 Université Pierre and Marie Curie, Mathématiques Tour 45-46, 5 et., 4 Place Jussieu, 75252 Paris Cedex 05, FranceReceived 7 March 1994; accepted 31 October 1994
© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.
0. Introduction
Let K be a field of characteristic zero
complete
for a non-archimedean absolutevalue,
let V be the associated valuationring
and k its residue field of characteristic p. In this article we prove(cf.
Section4)
that anoverconvergent isocrystal
of rankone defined on an open subscheme X of
Pk
has a Frobenius structure(i.e.
it is anoverconvergent F-isocrystal)
when it hasexponents (4.4.4)
in each residue class of Z =P1kBX
of thetype zl(p-1 - 1),
where s ~ N and z E Z( i.e.
inZp
nQ).
It is known
[Ba-Ct]
that in dimension one the notion ofoverconvergent isocrys-
tals can be translated into the notion of
"convergence
on thegeneric
disk" for classicalp-adic
differentialequations. Using
thispoint
of view we are able toprove the local existence of a Frobenius structure
(Section 2)
in each residue class of Z =P1kBX.
Theproblem of connecting
the Frobenius structures in the different residue classes is then solved in Section 3using
a method due to Dwork[Dw2].
1. Notation. Arithmetic
properties
of differentialoperators
Throughout
this article K will denote a field of characteristic0, complete
undera non-archimedean absolute
value - 1;
V denotes its valuationring
andM ~ V
the maximal
ideal,
we indicateby k
the residue field of finite characteristic p, which we suppose to beperfect. Moreover,
the absolute value is normalizedby
| p | = p-1.
In this
paragraph
we will deal with arithmeticproperties
of the coefficients of a linear differentialoperator
whose solutions converge on thegeneric
disk ofD(0,1-).
1.1. Consider a first order differential
operator
Lwhere
f (x)
EK(x)
has 0 as theonly pole
inD(0,1-). By Mittag-Leffler
decom-position
we may write:where ai
E K andf+(x) E K(x)
has nopoles
inD(0,1-).
1.2. We will say that
(1.1.2)
has theproperty
of convergence on thegeneric
diskof (or
converges on thegeneric
diskof) D(0,1-)
if its solution at thegeneric point
tconverges in the whole open disk
D(t,1-).
1.3. Let
K[x]
be thering of polynomials
in K in the indeterminate x. We consider RC R’
twoK-algebras
which containK[x]
and are endowed with a derivatived dx
which extendsâ
ofK[x].
We indicateDR
=R[d dx]. Every
elementof DR
actson R’ and,
of course, R. We will say that two elementsL, L’
EDR
areequivalent
over
R’
if there existsM ~ R’ ( invertible
elements ofR’),
such that1.4. For an
operator
as in(1.1),
under thehypothesis
of convergence on thegeneric
disk of
D(0,1-),
we are interested in the arithmeticproperties
of the coefficients of thesingular part
off (x)
at0,
i.e. in the notation(1.1.3): f (x) - f+(x).
We denote
by O(D (0, 1-))
theK -algebra
of theanalytic
functions onD(0,1-).
And
O(D(0, 1-))[1 x]
denotes theK-algebraof analytic
functions onD(0,1-)B{0}
with
meromorphic pole
at 0. We then haveLEMMA 1.4.1
(cf. [Rol,
Lemme5.3]).
Consider adifferential operator
L as in (1.1):which converges on the
generic
diskof D(0,1-).
Then L isequivalent
onO(D(0,1-))[1 x] to L’ where
In
particular L’
has theproperty of convergence
at thegeneric disk of D (0,1-).
We then obtain
PROPOSITION 1.4.2. Consider
ai E K and suppose it has the property
of
convergence on thegeneric
diskof
D(0,1-),
thenProof.
The first assertion is an easy consequence of Dwork-Frobenius theorem[Ch1, 4.8.1].
For thesecond,
see forexample [Ro1,
Lemme5.4]. Q.E.D.
OBSERVATION 1.4.3. Consider L as in the
previous proposition,
then alsohas the
property of convergence
on thegeneric
diskof D (0, 1 -).
Proof By 1.4.2,
a, ~Zp.
We have that(x - t)al
converges inD(t, 1 -) [Ro2],
[Ch2]. Q.E.D.
1.5. We dénote
by
7r the elementwhich,
in case,belongs
to anopportune
extensionof K such that
7rp-l =
-p, hence17rl |
=p-(1/p-1).
We nowgive
a first estimateresult for the coefficients PROPOSITION 1.5.1. Let
be a
differential operator, with ai
e li(an ~ 0),
which has theproperty of
convergence on the
generic
diskqyj9(0,1").
Then|an| l?rl.
Inparticular if n fl 1, mod p,
then alsohas the
property of
convergence on thegeneric
diskof D(0, 1-).
Proof.
One may consider the solution of L at thegeneric point
t:which has value 1 at t. We can also
develop
theTaylor
series of theargument
of the exp in theneighborhood
oft, using x
= y + tNow we can take the
expansion of exp,
we obtain a series:where
By hypothesis
we know that(1.5.1.1)
converges for1 y
1. Thedegree
ofAN,
aspolynomial
int ,
isexactly
nN : the coefficient of thehighest
power isThe fact that t is the
generic point
and the fact that(1.5.1.1)
converges for1 y |
1allow us to write
for each c 1. We
deduce | an | |03C0|.
If n 0
1mod p,
then one may consider:and write the
expansion
at t of the solution(n 2)
Apply
theprevious
method to(1.5.1.3).
It turns out that theTaylor expansion
at tis
which is
convergent for |y|
1: infact |an n-1| |03C0|. Finally L’
has theproperty
of convergence on the
generic
disk: in fact its solution at thegeneric point t
is thequotient
of the solutions of(1.5.1.2) (i.e. (1.5.1.3))
and of L whichconverged
inD(t,1-). Q.E.D.
REMARK 1.5.1.4.
Using
the samemethods,
if in the statement of theprevious
theorem the
hypothesis
of convergence on thegeneric
disk ofD(0,1-)
had beenreplaced by
thehypothesis
that the solution converges in the closed diskD(0,1+)
then the conclusion would
be |an 1 |03C0|.
For the case n =-
1, modp,
we have a similar result under further assump- tions.PROPOSITION 1.5.2.
Suppose
that L is the lineardifferential operator
a e
K,
has theproperty
of convergence on thegeneric
disk ofD(0,1-),
thenProof.
Consider as usual the solution at thegeneric point
t:One may then consider x = y + t and the
expansion
of theargument
of expBy developing
exp we have the series03A3N1 ANyN
withAs in the
Proposition
1.5.1 one may then concludethat |a| |03C0|.
Consider now thecoefficient
AN
with N = ps fors E N, s =1 0,1.
In this caseAps
is apolynomial
int given by
monomials ofdegrees
which range from p + ps to psp + ps =p2 S
+ ps.Let us consider the coefficient in
Aps
of1 tps+ps :
it may be written as(up
tosign)
where
J*
is the set ofs-uples, (ij)
e N* S such thati1 +... + is
= ps butexcluding
the case
(p,..., p); 03B1(ij)
e Z and itdepends
on(ij).
We notice then that for each1 e N:
if
10-
0mod p.
We then haveIn
particular, t being
ageneric element,
we have:for each c 1. We conclude
that |a p| |03C0|.
REMARK 1.5.3. The same
proposition
holds in the casr E
N,
r 2. Inparticular
theargument
now involves the monomialof degree
prs inplace
of thatof degree
ps.REMARK 1.5.4. The
previous
results can beeasily generalized
to the case ofsystems (i.e.
when the ai eMn(K),
n~ N):
we willget
information on theeigenvalues
of the associated matrices.2.
Convergence
on thegeneric
disk andoverconvergent
Frobenius2.1. Consider now the
following
differentialoperator
ai e K. It may be seen as an
operator
inPx
with itsonly singularity
at x = 0. Inparticular
one maytake,
x,,., the coordinate at oo and re-write(2.1.1) by
means ofthis coordinate:
Then L has the
property
of convergence on thegeneric
disk ofD(0,1-)
if andonly
if it has the sameproperty
for thegeneric
disk ofDx~ (0, 1 -).
If this is thecase the fact that L has no
singularities
inDxoo(O, 1-)
allows us to concludeby
transfer
[Dwl]
that the solution of L at x~ = 0 converges in the whole open diskDx~(0,1-).
REMARK 2.1.3. Of course
dividing (2.1.2) by x2~
does notchange
itsproperties,
and for the purposes of this paper, it is
equivalent
to refer to theoperator
L at o0 after divisionby x2~
i.e. to theoperator
which we will once
again
indicateby
L.2.2.
By
a Frobeniusautomorphism
of the fieldK,
withperfect
residue fieldk,
wemean a continuous
automorphism (hence isometric) ff :
K - K which lifts the usual Frobeniusautomorphism
of k. Inparticular
for each xE V
we haveWe will denote
by QS
the s-iterated map. Connected to u we have also an auto-morphism
of the fieldK(x).
Forf (x)
EK(x)
we will indicatefa(x)
EK(x)
theelement obtained
applying
u to the coefficients off (x).
OnK(x)
we then define the map ~ :K(x) ~ K(x),
as~(f(x))
=f03C3(xp) (i.e.
we substitute xP to x inf03C3(x))
and we call it Frobenius. We may alsoiterate w
By continuity
we extend the map ~ and its iterates to the field E ofanalytic
elements
[Ch1] (the completion
under the Gauss norm ofK(x)),
and also to thering
of "functions" W =W(0, 1),
[Ch3], by setting
forIn
particular
the Frobeniusautomorphism
of W stabilizesWo(0,1),
Note that E
C W (cf. [Ch3,
Section5]).
DEFINITION 2.2.2. A linear differential
operator
of thetype
ai
~ K
has astrong overconvergent
Frobenius structure if it isequivalent
for acertain s E N to
on the
J( -algebra
of theanalytic
functions onREMARK 2.2.5. To have a
strong overconvergent
Frobenius structure for a dif-ferential
operator
L as in(2.2.3)
isequivalent
to the assertion that(cf. (2.1 ))
is
equivalent
toon the
ring
ofanalytic
functions onREMARK 2.2.6.
Suppose
that a linear differentialoperator
of thetype
ai E
K,
has astrong overconvergent
Frobenius structure. Thenalso has a
strong overconvergent
Frobenius structure if andonly
if a =z ps-1
forz e
Z,
s E N[Bel], [Ro2].
2.3.
Using
the definition and remarks in 2.2 we can prove THEOREM 2.3.1. Consider the operatorof
the typewhere ai E Il .
Suppose
it has theproperty of
convergence on thegeneric
diskof D(0, 1-).
Then L has an overconvergentstrong
Frobenius structure.Proof. Using
2.1 and Remark 2.2.5 we canstudy
theproblem
from thepoint
of view of the coordinate at
infinity.
In thissetting,
we have to prove that if anoperator
of thetype
has the
property
of convergence on thegeneric
disk ofD(0,1-)
then it isequivalent
for a certain s E N to the differential
operator
on the
ring of analytic
functions on{P
EAK | |x(P)| 1 03BB},
for À ER,
À 1.Notice that
~s(L) (2.3.1.2)
has theproperty
of convergence on thegeneric
disk ofD(0,1-) [Ch1, 4.7.2].
Consider now a
solution,
g, of L as in(2.3.1.1): by
the fact that such anoperator
has nosingularities
onD(0,1-)
andby
theproperty
of convergence on thegeneric
disk we conclude thatg(x)
E0 (D (0, 1 -» (transfer principle [Dwl]).
But, actually, g(x)
EWO(O,I)
C W(2.2.1), [Chl,
4.3.7 and5.1.7].
We thenobtain that L has a
strong overconvergent
Frobenius structure if andonly
if thereexists s e N such that the
quotient
defines an
analytic
function on{P
EA1K | |x(P)| 1 03BB}
where À eR,
À 1.(The
fact that(2.2.1.3)
is invertible is then a consequence of the fact that it satisfiesa differential
operator
withoutsingularities
inf P
EA1K | |x(P)| 1 03BB}).
Formally
one hason the other hand
(h
EN)
and if we choose such that
for i =
2,...,
n, theng(X)ph
converges in a closed diskD(0, 1 03BB’+), A’
1. Inparticular g(x)ph belongs
toE,
the field ofanalytic
elements. We then conclude thatg(x)
e W isactually algebraic
over E.We now
strictly
follow the articles[Ch3]
and[Ch4].
The fact thatE[g(x)] C
Wis a finite extension field of E
implies
that the Frobenius stabilizesE[g(x)],
infact
[Ch3,
Theorem5.2].
We thenapply [Ch3, Proposition 7.1]
and argue thatE[g(x)]
is a
semisimple object
in the abeliancategory, MC(E),
whoseobjects
arepairs
(M, ~)
where M is a finite dimensional E-vector space and ~ is a connection i.e.a K-linear map from
Der(E)
=E[d dx]
toEndK(M).
Exactly as
in([Ch3],
end of Sect.7)
we conclude that the sub-E-vector spaces ofE[g(x)] generated by
the various~h(g(x)), h
e Nare
sub-objects
ofE[g(x)]
inMC(E):
hencethey
are in finite number(up
toisomorphism).
There will existh, h’
E N such thati.e. there exists a E E* such that
~h(g(x))
=a~h’(g(x)).
From the "faithful"action of the Frobenius
[Ch5, 10.1]
we conclude that for s= h - h’|
E N we have[Ch4]
In
particular
one may notice thatq(x)
is ananalytic
element inD(0,1-) (it
is aquotient
of two invertible elements ofO(D(0, 1-)))
andTo conclude the
proof
of the theorem one needsonly
prove thefollowing
PROPOSITION 2.3.2.
If q(x)
E E isanalytic
inD(0, 1-)
andthen
q(x)
isanalytic
inD(0, 1 03BB)
with À E R and A 1.Proof. By [Mo, Proposition 1],
we knowthat, actually, q(x)
is ananalytic
function in the closed disk
D(0,1+).
We writewith bi
E K. We may cancel inP(x)
thebi’s
such thatIn
fact,
in this case,exp(-bi i+1 xi+1)
is thenanalytic
inD(0, r-)
for some r >1,
and we can
replace q(x) by
If,
after thissimplification, P(x)
is zero, thenwith c e
K*, and |bi i+1| |03C0| for
eachi,
isconvergent
inD (0, 1 03BB’)
withÀ’
E R and03BB’
1. If aftersimplification P(x)
is not zero, consider the termof highest degree
bm. By
the fact that the solution converges in the closed diskD(0,1+) we
knowthat
|bm| |03C0| (cf. 1.5.1.4).
But ourhypothesis
aboutP(x) implies
thatwe conclude that m + 1 must be divisible
by
p. In[Rol, 10.8],
Robba introduced thefollowing
functions for each h e Nwhere belong
to aspherically complete
extension of K[Chl, 1.9.7]
andand such that
fh(x)
converges inD(0,1-).
We may then write m= lph -
1 for al, h
EN, (l, p)
= 1.Consider 03B2 e K
such thatand the function
fh(03B2xl), h
E N. This function converges inD(0, 1!3I-t):
butIbml |03C0| hence |03B2|
1 andWe may
replace q(x) by q(x)fh(03B2xl)
andget
rid of the termbm of highest degree
of
P(x).
Weapply
this methodby
induction and we conclude thatq(x)
E E isactually convergent
inD(0,1 03BB)
with À E R and À 1.This concludes the
proof
of theProposition
2.3.2and, hence,
of Theorem2.3.1.
Q.E.D.
REMARK 2.3.3.
Recently
it has beenproved
that the03B3i’s,
which appear in theproof
of theprevious proposition,
can be chosen to bealgebraic
overQ ([MA], unpublished
andpartial
answers to theproblem
have beengiven by
B. Dwork and D.Chinellato) .
3. Frobenius structure
In this
paragraph
we will connect Frobenius structures withrespect
to different local coordinates: we willapply
the results of this Section in Section 4. Theproblem in
the
large
is thefollowing:
consider a seriesf (x - a)
where a e03BDBM.
One wouldlike to have information about the convergence set of the ratio
where
~(f(x - a))
is the Frobenius transformof f(x - a),
thatis, ~(f(x - a)) = JO" (xP - a03C3).
The idea is tochange
the variable x - a to x and tostudy f(x)
andf03C3 (xp)
=~(f(x)).
But the information that we then obtain fromf03C3(xp)
is relatedto
fol «x - a)P)
not tof03C3(xp - ae). Elaborating
an idea of Dwork(cf. [Dw2]),
wehave
PROPOSITION 3.1. Consider a E
VBM
and suppose that thedifferential
opera- torsatisfies
the propertyof convergence
on thegeneric
diskof D(0, 1 -) ( which
is thesame as that
of D(a, 1 - ».
Then there exists s E N such thatis
equivalent
to L on thering of analytic functions
onfor a 03BB ~ R, 03BB 1.
Proof.
As usual we canstudy
theproblem
at "oo" and must check whetheris
equivalent
toon the
analytic
functions on{P
EA1K | |x(P) - a | â }
for a À ER,
À 1.We denote the solution of
(3.1.2) by u(x - a).
Thenby
thehypothesis
ofconvergence on the
generic disk,
we conclude thatu(x - a)
eW°(a, 1) [Chl,
4.3.7, 5.1.7]. (The
definition ofWo(a, 1)
isanalogous
to that ofWo(0,1)
in(2.2),
x is
replaced by x -
a[Chl].)
We define the Frobeniusaction,
cp, onW°(a, 1)
in the usual way: if
v(x - a)
eW°(a, 1)
thencp(v(x - a))
=vO"(xP - a03C3).
So~s(u(x - a)) = uO"s (xPS - a03C3s)
is a solution of(3.1.3).
We must show that thereexists
s E N
such thatconverges for
{P
eA1K | |x(P) - al 1 03BB}
for a À ER, À
1.First of all we
change
the variable x to x - a in(3.1.2),
thenobtaining
The
operator (3.1.4)
satisfies theproperty
of convergence on thegeneric
disk. Itfollows from Theorem 2.3.1 that there exists
s E N
such thatconverges for Let us write
The first term on the
right
hand side isnothing
but(3.1.5)
after we havereplaced x by x - a.
Hence it converges for{P
EA1K | 11 x (P) - a| 1 03BB’}
for someÀ’
eR,
AI 1. To prove the theorem we need to check the assertion of overconvergence for the last term. To this end we introduce the function of two variables
We will exhibit the
relationship
between Z and Y in order to obtain convergence for(3.1.7).
We know thatu03C3s(Y)
satisfies thefollowing
differentialoperator
which has the
property
of convergence on thegeneric
disk ofD(0,1 ) (in
the Ycoordinate) (cf. [Chl, 4.6.1]).
We mayexpand (3.1.7)
in theTaylor
series:where
u03C3s(i)(Y) u03C3s(Y) is, by
recurrence, apolynomial
in Yof degree
less than orequal
to(n - 2)1. By
thehypothesis
of convergence on thegeneric
disk[Chl, 4.3.7],
thereexists N E
R,
such thatfor each l E
N, where | - | is
the Gauss norm i.e. theboundary
norm[Chl, 2.4.7].
So,
for each|Y| r, r > 1, by
the fact thatis a
polynomial
ofdegree
less than orequal
to(n - 2)1,
whose coefficients arebounded
by N,
we obtainWe deduce that
x(Y, Z)
converges for Z suchthat 1 Z | 1 rn-2 and 1 Y |
r. Andviceversa
if 1 Z 1 À
1 then the series convergesfor |Y| (03BB - 1 n-2 .
To conclude the
proof it
now suffices to set Y =xps - aO"s
and Z =(x - a)pg -
xp g - aO"s
and an easy calculation shows that thereexists A
eR, À 1,
such thatif
4.
Overconvergent F-crystals
The main result of this section is the
following
THEOREM 4.1. Let X be an open k-subscheme
of Pl.
Then in the categoryof overconvergentisocrystals
the
objects,
i. e. theoverconvergent isocrystals,
which have rank one and exponentsof
the typesZ 1 for z
E Z and s E N at each residue class are overconvergentF-isocrystals.
The
proof
of this theorem will begiven
in 4.6.4.2. Before
going through
theproof
of the theorem we will recall some definitions(mainly
from[Be2]):
we will restrict ourselves togiving
them in ourparticular setting (i.e
dimension1),
eventhough they
can begiven
in ageneral
situation. We willalways
refer to Berthelot’s notation.Consider
X,
ak-open
subscheme ofP ) ;
theprojective
k-line may be viewedas a
compactification
of X. The open subscheme X will be of thetype
where we may suppose that among the
iii’s
there is oo = am.Following
Berthelot’s notation we will indicate
Zk = {a1,..., am}.
We denoteby 1v
theformal
projective V-line,
we then obtain thediagram
where the first map is an open immersion while the second
represents P1k
as aclosed subscheme of
1v.
Of course thegeneric
fiber ofÔ) (
inRaynaud’s
sense[Ra])
isPl .
Let ai ,... , am-l be
representatives
inA K 1
ofa1, ...,
am-1: theai’s
will beelements of V in distinct residue classes. We then consider for each A E
(0,1)
thefollowing
affinoid subset ofPl :
They
form a cofinalsystem
in the set of strictneighborhood
of]X[pi v (the
tubeof X in
P1K) [Be2, 1.2.1], [Ba-Ct].
We have thefollowing
inclusion for each03BB ~ (0,1)
Let E be a sheaf defined in some strict
neighborhood V03BB,
we may associate to it asheaf defined in
PK
asIt is then clear that if
A2
>03BB1
and if E is a sheaf defined inVA, then
In
particular
one can take the structural sheaf ofP1K, 0,
andconsider j~O.
Ofcourse
(where Ov,,
is the structural sheaf inva).
Thesheaf j~O is a
sheaf ofrings:
we may introduce the
category of j~O-modules
whoseobjects
are sheaves inPK
which
are j~O-modules (cf. [Be2, 2.1 ]
forgeneral statements).
It is known that if G is acoherent j t
0-module[Be2, 2.1.9],
then there exists a strictneighborhood VA
and a coherentOv À -module, î,
such that[Be2, 2.1.10].
We may also define[Be2, 2.2.2]
aconnection, V, (automatically integrable:
we are in dimension1)
relative to K on acoherent jto-module
G(we
will then refer to(G, V)
as a coherentconnection j~O-module)
as a K -linearhomomorphism
which satisfies the usual Leibnitz’s rule.
Every
coherentconnection j~O-module
is also the
image by j t
of a coherent module endowed with a connection definedin a strict
neighborhood
of the tube of X inP1K [Be2, 2.2.3]: namely
if(G, V)
is a coherent
connection j~O-module,
relative toAB
then there exists a strictneighborhood VA
of the tube of X inPv
and a coherentOv À-module î
endowedwith a "usual"
connection ~o
suchthat j~(03B5, ~o)
=(G, ~).
Inparticular, by
thefact that
P1K
is smooth andeverything
is defined overK,
of characteristic0,
weconclude that E is
locally
free.4.3. Under the
previous hypotheses,
we may nowgive
thefollowing [Be2, 2.3.6]
DEFINITION 4.3.1. The
category Iso~(X/K)
is thecategory
whoseobjects
are coherent connection
(relative
toK, automatically integrable) j~O-modules,
(G, V),
which areoverconvergent along Zk. Namely
this meansthat,
if(G, V) =
j~(03B5, ~o),
foreach il
1 there existsÀ
e(0,1)
suchthat,
for each sectione E
f(VI’ î):
(where Il - Ilv 7
denotes any Banach norm on0393(03BB, C).
And â denotes the usualderivation) [Bel, 2.2.14], [Ba-Ct].
The
objects of Iso~(X/K)
will be calledoverconvergent isocrystals.
REMARK 4.3.2. It is proven in
[Be2]
that thecategory
isindependent
of thecompactification
of X.4.4.
By
thegeneral arguments
in 4.2 we know that if(G, ~)
is a coherent connectionj~O-module,
then it is of thetype j~(03B5, Vo) = (G, V),
where E islocally
freesheaf on a strict
neighborhood VA.
We define that the rankof (G, V)
as the rankof E.
The affinoid sets
VA
are known in the literature as affinoid connected sets ofPk . We have
PROPOSITION 4.4.1
(Fresnel-van
derPut). Every locally free sheaf of
rank 1 onan
affinoid
connected setof Pk is free.
Proof.
The J( -affinoidalgebra
of theholomorphic
functions on the affinoid connected set is aprincipal
idealring [F-vdP, II.4.13],
and thelocally
free modulesover a
principal ring
are free[F-vdP, 111.8.3]. Q.E.D.
Let us consider a coherent
connection j~O-module (G, V),
suppose it of rank 1:by
means of the discussion in 4.2 we know that(G, V)
isactually j~(03B5, V 0)’
where E is a free
Ov03BB-module
of rank 1 and the connection can be defined afterchoosing
a basis ofS, e
and for each a eO(VA), by
where
f
eO(V03BB). By
theMittag-Leffler decomposition [F-vdP] f
can be writtenwhere
bl, bil
EK,
andand for
We may now
give
thefollowing
DEFINITION 4.4.4. In the
foregoing hypotheses
and notation(4.4), for j
=1,...,
m - 1 we defineblj
as theexponents
of the coherentconnection j~O-
module of rank
1, (G, V).
REMARK. We will refer to
as the
exponent
at oo. Notice that the definition isindependent
of the choice of therepresentative
ajof aj, j
=1,...,
m - 1.We also recall that for a coherent
connection j~O-module
of rank one(hence free), (G, ~),
associated tof, multiplication by
an invertibleelement g
ofOV03BB(V03BB)
(A
E(0,1)) gives an isomorphic connexion (G, ~’) with the same underlined j~O-
module but associated to
f
+g’ g. In
fact the twogive isomorphic overconvergent isocrystals.
We may then state:PROPOSITION 4.4.5. Consider a coherent
connection j~O-module of
rank one(G, V): it is free
and it admits abasis,
e, in someV03BB, for
some 03BB ~(0, 1),
suchthat the connection may be
represented by
where
f(x)
EK(x)
and hasonly poles
in theai’s.
Proof. By
theprevious
discussions we know there exists A E(0,1)
such that(G,V) = jt(£, Va),
where 9 is a freeOV, -module
of rank one(4.4.1).
Theconnection
V’ 0
isrepresented
in abasis e’
of Eby:
where
f
EO(Va). Using
theMittag-Leffler decomposition [F-vdP] f
can bewritten
where
bl, bjl E J(
andand for
We fix one of the elements which form the
decomposition, say j ;
theproof
forthe others is similar.
We know that
it follows that the
primitive of ;
converges
for 1 x - aj 1
> À(strictly).
Consider 1 >Àj
> À: inparticular there
willexist
n(j, 03BBj)
EN,
such that if 1n(j, 03BBj):
It follows that
is
analytic for |x - aj | 03BBj,
andBut since
|03C0| is
the radius of convergence of theexponential
map, we obtain thatis invertible
analytic
in the domaineWe
apply
the sameprocedure
foreach j
=1,...,
m - 1 and oo. We obtain aninvertible function
which is
analytic
and invertible in a strictneighborhood V03BB,
whereX
=max(03BB1, ..., 03BBm-1, Aoo)
1.Then, g(x)
is the invertible elementrequired by
the
proposition. Q.E.D.
REMARK 4.4.6. As a result of this section we obtain that a coherent connection
j t
0-module of rank 1 in X(which
may besupposed
not to containoc), (G, ~),
may be viewed
as j~(03B5, Vo),
where E is a free module of rank one inCw a
forsome À e
(0, 1). £
admits a basis e such that the connection is definedby
where
f(x)
eK(x)
and hasonly
onesingular point
in each residue classa1, ..., am-1, ~ (P1kBX = {a1...,am,~}).
4.5. We recall some other definitions.
Suppose
u is an continuousautomorphism
o,: Il ~ K which induces the Frobenius in the residue
field, k,
which issupposed
to be
perfect.
Anobject, (G, V),
ofIsoc~(X/K)
is said to be an overconvergentF,’-isocrystal
if there exists s E N such that:(as Isoct (X/K) objects),
whereFs*03C3
is the s-times iterated absolute Frobenius.The
object Fs*03C3G
is obtained from Gby
firstapplying
an extension of scalarsusing
a, thenby taking
the inverseimage
inIsoc~ (XI J() by
means of the relative Frobenius inX, and, finally, iterating
thisprocedure
s-times(cf. [Be2, 2.3.7], [Bel, 4.1]).
REMARK 4.5.2. In our
setting (i.e.
X open subscheme ofP 1)
we may bemore
explicit.
In fact consider u : K ~ Il which is alifting
of thepth-
power
automorphism
of theperfect
field k. As we said X may be viewed as X =P1kB{a1,...,am-1,am}, by
scalarextension,
we can considerX(P)
=P1kB{ap1,..., apm-1, apm} (note
that oo is sent to itselfby
this scalarextension).
On the other hand an
overconvergent isocrystal
on(X/K), (G, V)
may be repre- sented(4.4.6) by
anoperator
of thetype
where f(x) = 03A3mi=1 lai (X) E K(x) and the fai(x)’s
are the residualparts of f(x)
along ai’s;
theai’s
arelifting
ofai’S
in K. After the scalar extensionby
a weobtain a
system (Ga, ~03C3)
defined in some strictneighborhood
ofX(p)
inPk
ofthe
type (for
some À E(0,1))
by
(this
is obtained fromf (x) simply by applying o,
to thecoefficients).
Of course thea9"s
areliftings
in characteristic 0 of theiiip ’S.
We then have the relative Frobenius
(which,
in our case, isjust
thepth-power
of the
coordinates)
X -X(p),
which can also be lifted to characteristic 0by
thepth-power
on thecoordinates,
F. We then obtain(s
= 1 in(4.5.1))
the definitionIn
particular (F03C3*G, F03C3*~)
is connected with the differentialoperator:
defined in some strict
neighborhood
of X inPK.
FurthermoreF03C3*G
is still a freerank
one j t 0-module.
It is then clear how to iterate thisprocedure.
4.6. We now
give
aproof
of Theorem 4.1.Proof.
Let(G, V)
be anobject
ofIsoct (X/K)
of rank one. We know from 4.4 that(G, V)
may be viewed aswhere E is a free module defined in some strict
neighborhood, va ( a
e(0,1)),
ofthe tube of X and
B7 0
is viewed asexpressed
in aglobal basis,
e, of Eby:
where
f (x)
eK(x)
withjust
onepole
in each residue classgiven by Zk = {a1,...,am}.
This
setting
has been studiedby [Ba-Ct,
Sect.3] and,
inparticular,
it was shownthat the condition of overconvergence is
equivalent
to the condition of convergenceon the
generic
disk ofD(0,1-)
for the linear differentialequation
associated to the horizontal sections of~o (4.6.2)
We must show
that,
under ourhypotheses,
there exists an s E N such that the coherentconnection j t
0 -module(Fs*03C3 G , Fs*03C3~),
which is connected in a suitable strictneighborhood
of the tube of X inPK (and
after a choice of abasis)
to thedifferential
equation
is
isomorphic (as connection j~O-module)
to(G, ~).
This turns out to beequiva-
lent to
showing
that there exists a strictneighborhood V03BB (À 1)
of the tube of X inP1K
such that the twoequations (4.6.4)
and(4.6.3)
areequivalent
onO(V03BB):
i.e.there exists an invertible element of
O(V03BB), 03B8(x),
whichgives Y’
=03B8(x)Y.
This will be done
by writing (4.6.3)
in the formwhere each
fai (x - ai)
is the residualpart
at ai in theMittag-Leffler decomposition of f (x).
We will then show that for each i =
1,...,
m, there exists ans(i)
E N suchthat
and
are
equivalent
over thering
ofholomorphic
functions in a set of thetype
with
Ài 1 if ai ~ ~ (If ai
= oo we haveTi
={P
eAk | |x(P)| 1 03BBi},
stillwith 03BBi 1).
We then take À =
maxi=1,...,m Ài
and s =1cm(s(1), ..., s(m))
to say that the twoequations (4.6.3)
and(4.6.4)
areequivalent
on theholomorphic
functions onV03BB.
The condition of convergence at the
generic
disk ofD(0,1-)
for(4.6.3),
i.e.for the
operator
is
equivalent
to the same condition for the diskD(ai,1-).
It isknown, then,
that(4.6.8)
isequivalent on O(D(ai,1-))
towhich still has the
property
of convergence at thegeneric
disk ofD(ai,1-) (cf.
[Rol,
Lemme5.3], 1.4.1).
Weexplicitly
write the differentialequation
connectedwith
(4.6.9)
where
by hypothesis bli
e1/(pSi - 1)Z,
for acertain si
e N. From(4.6.4)
wehave
We have to show that the two
operators (4.6.10)
and(4.6.11 )
areequivalent
on theK-algebra, O(Ti),
ofanalytic
functions defined in a set of thetype Ti, (4.6.7),
i.e.there exists a 03B8 e
O(Ti)*
such that(4.6.11 )
is transformed in(4.6.10) by
Y =0Y’ .
In
particular bli
~Zp
hence alsosatisfies the
hypothesis
of convergence on thegeneric
disk ofD(ai,1-).
We thenapply Proposition
3.1 to conclude that(4.6.12)
isequivalent
for a certain 5 e Nto
in a set of the
type {P
EP1K | 11 x (P) - ai| > 1 03BBi}. Using
Remark 2.2.6 forb1j,
wetake
s(i)
=lcm(si, s).
’
Q.E.D.
References
[Ba-Ct] Baldassarri, F. and Chiarellotto, B.: "Algebraic versus rigid cohomology with logarithmic
coefficients" to appear in Proceedings of the Barsotti Memorial Symposium. Abano Terme (Padova) June 1991, Perspectives in Mathematics, Academic Press.
[Be1] Berthelot, P.: "Cohomologie rigide et théorie de Dwork: le cas des sommes exponentielles", Astérisque 119-120 (1984) 17-50.
[Be2] Berthelot, P.: "Cohomologie rigide et cohomologie rigide à support propre", to appear in
Astérisque.
[Be3] Berthelot, P.: "Géométrie rigide et cohomologie des variétés algébriques de caractéristiques p", Soc. Math. de France, 2e Série, Mémoires n.23 (1986) 7-32.
[Ch1] Christol, G.: "Modules différentiels et équations différentielles p-adiques". Queen’s Papers
in Pure and Applied Mathematics, n.66, Queen’s
University,
Kingston (Ontario) 1983.[Ch2] Christol, G.: "Un théorème de transfert pour les disques singulier réguliers", Astérisque 119-120 (1984) 151-168.
[Ch3] Christol, G.: "Fonctions et éléments algébriques", Pacific Journal of Math. 125 (1986)
1-37.
[Ch4] Christol, G.: "Solutions algébriques des équations différentielles p-adiques", Sém. Delange-
Pisot-Poitou 1981/82 (1983) 51-58.
[Ch5] Christol, G.: "Systèmes différentiels linéaires p-adiques: structure de Frobenius faible", Bull. Soc. Math. France 109 (1981) 83-122.
[Dw1] Dwork, B.: "On p-adic differential equations II", Annals of Math. 98 (1973) 366-376.
[Dw2] Dwork, B.: "p-adic cycles", Pubbl. IHES 37 (1969), 27-116.
[Fr-vdP] Fresnel, J. and van der Put, M.: "Géométrie analytique rigide et applications", Progress in
Math. 18, Birkhauser (1981).
[Ma] Matsuda, S.: "Local indices of p-adic differential equations
corresponding
to Artin-Schreier2014Witt covering", Preprint 1993, Tokyo.
[Mo] Motzkin, E.: "Décomposition d’élément analytique en facteurs singuliers", Ann. Inst.
Fourier 27 (1977) 67-82.
[Ra] Raynaud, M.: "Géométrie analytique rigide", Bull. Soc. Math. France, Mémoire 39-40
(1974) 319-327.
[Ro1] Robba, P.: "Indice d’un opérateur différentiel p-adique IV. Cas des systèmes", Ann. Inst.
Fourier 35, 2 (1985) 13-55.
[Ro2] Robba, P.: "Une introduction naive aux cohomologies de Dwork", Soc. Math. de France, 2e Série, Mémoires n.23 (1986) 61-105.