• Aucun résultat trouvé

What are the reasons for the variability of pig responses to dietary tryptophan supply?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "What are the reasons for the variability of pig responses to dietary tryptophan supply?"

Copied!
7
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01455866

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01455866

Submitted on 5 Jun 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

What are the reasons for the variability of pig responses to dietary tryptophan supply?

Nathalie Le Floc’H, Cornelis F.M. de Lange, Aude Simongiovanni

To cite this version:

Nathalie Le Floc’H, Cornelis F.M. de Lange, Aude Simongiovanni. What are the reasons for the vari- ability of pig responses to dietary tryptophan supply?. CLANA, Mexican Animal Nutrition Specialists Association (AMENA)., Oct 2012, Puerto Vallarta, Mexico. 6 p. �hal-01455866�

(2)

What are the reasons for the variability of pig responses to dietary tryptophan supply?

Nathalie Le Floc’h

1,2

, Cornelis F.M. de Lange

3

and Aude Simongiovanni

4

1 INRA, UMR1348 Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l'Animal et les Systèmes d'Elevage, F-35590 Saint-Gilles, France et 2 Agrocampus Ouest, UMR1348 Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l'Animal et les Systèmes d'Elevage, F-35000 Rennes, France,

3 Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1

4 AJINOMOTO EUROLYSINE S.A.S., 153 rue de Courcelles, F-75817 Paris cedex 17, France

Keywords : Pigs, Tryptophan, Requirement INTRODUCTION

Besides being a constituent of body protein, tryptophan (Trp) plays other important roles in metabolism (Henry et al., 1996; Melchior et al., 2004 and 2005; Zhang et al., 2007). Increasing the dietary Trp content has also been shown to limit the impact of an unfavourable sanitary environment on performance in pigs (Le Floc’h et al., 2008 and 2010; Trevisi et al., 2009; de Ridder et al., 2012). Being an indispensable amino acid (AA) for pigs, Trp has to be supplied by the diet in sufficient quantities to cover the animal’s requirement. However, Trp requirement reported in the literature can be quite variable. For instance, the reported standardized ileal digestible (SID) Trp:Lys requirement in piglets varies between 17% and 23% (Lewis et al., 1977; Susenbeth and Lucanus, 2005; Jansman et al., 2010). The objective of this paper is to to give an overview of the variability of Trp requirement in growing pigs and to discuss the potential reasons for the variability that is reported in the literature.

I. ESTIMATION OF THE TRYPTOPHAN REQUIREMENT

In animal nutrition, it is usual to perform dose-response trials to estimate AA requirements. A part of the variability of pig response to Trp comes from the fact that the objective and the protocol of the trial are not always in line with the method used to interpret experimental results.

Trp requirement in the literature is reported in a wide range of units: amount in the feed (% of the feed or g per unit of energy), ingested quantity relative to weight gain (mg per g of daily gain), relative to Lys (% of Lys), and daily intake (g/d). In dose- response studies, the basal diet must be designed according to the way in which the requirement will be expressed (Petersen, 2011). For example, to express the Trp requirement as a ratio of Lys, Lys

must be the second limiting AA in the diet after Trp while the supply of the other AA should meet or slightly exceed animals’ requirements (Boisen, 2003).

Flaws in experimental design are responsible for a part of the variability of the Trp requirement.

A principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on a database comprising 26

trials that study the Trp requirement of piglets (7-25kg). A sub-set of 26 dose-

responses (testing at least four levels of Trp) was selected from 116 studies because

they were designed to express the Trp requirement relative to Lys. The set of

variables used for the PCA included, among others, the net energy dietary level and

the piglets responses to Trp as average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake

(ADFI) and gain to feed ratio (G:F). The net energy appeared to be correlated at 34,

(3)

31 and 51% to response for ADG, ADFI and G:F respectively, meaning that the dietary energy level can be a factor affecting the piglets response to Trp.

The PCA study also revealed a negative correlation between the duration of a trial and the response to Trp at 37, 20 and 35% for ADG, ADFI and G:F respectively.

However, if the duration is too short, the requirement will be underestimated; this is more likely to occur when growth is used as the response criteria, since a deficiency of some nutrients will have an effect on growth only after a certain period (Pomar, 1995; Haushild et al., 2010). To estimate the Trp requirement for a growing population, the duration of the experiment has therefore to be taken into account.

II. THE CONTRIBUTION OF A META-ANALYSIS

The important variability that exists between Trp dose-responses illustrates that a single study may be insufficient to provide a “reliable” estimate of the Trp requirement. Meta-analyses are often used to combine results of several studies and allow identification of sources that contribute to variation within an experiment and between experiments (Sauvant et al., 2008). The results of the meta-analysis performed by Simongiovanni et al. (2012) about the SID Trp:Lys requirement in piglets highlighted some factors of the variability that is reported in the literature about the pig response to Trp.

First of all, the statistical method used to interpret data from dose-response studies will affect the reported animal response. The means comparisons (ANOVA) are not an adequate method to analyse data from doses-response experiments (Morris, 1983; Shearer, 2000) but they are still misused by biologists (Dawkins, 1983). A response-curve that represents animal response to Trp has to be chosen to estimate the Trp requirement (Pesti et al., 2009). Response-curves of populations of piglets to an increased level of SID Trp:Lys have been generated using linear-plateau (LP or broken-line), curvilinear-plateau (CLP or quadratic-plateau) and asymptotic (ASY) models by Simongiovanni et al. (2012). The results indicated that the choice of the statistical model has an important impact on estimated Trp requirements (the mean SID Trp:Lys requirement was estimated at 17% with the LP model, at 22% with the CLP model and at 26% with the ASY model) and this observation is in line with those of Baker (1986), Shearer (2000), Barea et al. (2009) and Petersen (2011). The comparison of models as discussed in Simongiovanni et al. (2012), concluded that the CLP model is the best descriptor of the effect of a nutrient on growth performance for growing populations and so, gives an adequate estimate of the SID Trp:Lys requirement for practical applications.

The results of the meta-analysis also revealed that t

he response criterion optimised is a factor explaining a part of the variability in the reported Trp requirement. For models CLP and ASY, requirement estimates were greater for ADG and ADFI than for G:F, which is in agreement with the results reported by Baker et al. (1971) and Han et al. (1993). The specific effect of Trp on feed intake (see below) could explain the slightly lower requirement estimate for G:F.

In this meta-analysis, the trial selection was done on the nutritional values recalculated with the INRA tables (Sauvant et al., 2004); however, the recalculated Trp values were significantly lower than the values reported in the original experiments. A selection based on the same database but using the published nutritional values could therefore be performed, leading to a dataset comprising 26 dose-responses. Compared to the results published by Simongiovanni et al. (2012), the piglet response to Trp will be increased and the SID Trp:Lys requirement be

(4)

estimated between 1 and 3 points higher depending on the criteria optimised (ADG, ADFI or G:F). The usage of table values or analysed values will therefore also have an effect on the Trp requirement estimate.

Moreover,

e

stimates of the SID Trp:Lys requirement were slightly higher when only peer- reviewed publications were used. The reason for this difference is not known; however, it underlines the fact that there is a potential bias depending on the source of data used.

Finally, the meta-analysis also demonstrated that the SID Trp:Lys requirement estimate was not affected by the source of cereals in the diet (corn-based diets vs. diets based on a mix of cereals), and this result agrees with experimental results reported by Jansman et al. (2010) and Naatjes et al. (2010).

III. PHYSIOLOGICAL ROLES OF TRYPTOPHAN

The potential factors of variation of the piglet response to Trp have been described in the literature. They are associated with the complexity of Trp metabolism as well as with the numerous biological functions involving Trp or some of its metabolites (Le Floc’h et al., 2011). One important physiological function of Trp is to be a constituent of body protein. Otherwise, Trp is the precursor of serotonin (5-HT or 5- hydroxytryptamine), an important neuromediator regulating gastrointestinal functions, mood, appetite and hemodynamics. Lastly, Trp is degraded into kynurenine, an intermediary metabolite of a complex metabolic pathway ending in quinolinic acid, niacin, kynurenic and xanthurenic acid. Two enzymes degrade Trp into kynurenine, tryptophan dioxygenase or TDO (EC 1.13.11.11) and indoleamine dioxygenase or IDO (EC 1.13.11.42). While the first enzyme degrades Trp in excess, the second is associated with body defenses and immune response regulation.

From a quantitative point of view, Trp incorporation into proteins represents the most important fate of Trp utilization by the animals. In fact, the amount of Trp daily involved in protein turnover, i.e. both protein synthesis and breakdown, largely exceeds the amount of Trp supplied by the diet. In a growing pig, it could be estimated that around 50 to 60 % of ingested Trp are retained in body protein when Trp was supplied below the requirement. This proportion decreases when Trp supply exceeds the requirement because catabolism increases. The proportion of dietary Trp that follows the other metabolic pathways is probably low. However, these metabolic pathways are closely related to major biological functions that could require Trp repartitioning away from growth.

Trp is the precursor for niacin synthesis. It could be assumed that dietary niacin level could influence the conversion of Trp into niacin especially when niacin supply was low. Old data suggested that Trp was a substantial contributor for niacin synthesis but such results had been obtained with large Trp supplies that forced Trp catabolism and conversion into niacin (Leklem, 1971). Recently, Matte et al. (2008) clearly showed that the growth response of postweaning pigs to dietary Trp was not influenced by dietary niacin supply.

Protein deposition and growth rate are closely dependent on feed intake.

Consequently, factors influencing feed intake

can impact on estimates of requirements as well.

In pigs, the effect of Trp deficiency on growth is mainly caused by a reduction of

appetite and feed intake (Eder et al., 2001; Henry et al., 1992, 1996), which is not a

common response of other limiting AA except for valine. The mechanism whereby Trp

interacts with feed intake is not fully known. The synthesis of serotonin in the brain is

impaired in pigs fed a low Trp diet (Henry et al., 1996) while large excess of Trp

increased brain serotonin concentration (Adeola and Ball, 1992). However, the link

(5)

between serotonin and the regulation of feed intake is not so clear because serotonin is known to reduce appetite. Depressed feed intake caused by low Trp can be explained by a phenomenon of imbalance detected at the brain level because of a relative excess of LNAA compared to Trp. Another potential mechanism could be linked to ghrelin secretion, a gastrointestinal hormone regulating appetite, by the gastrointestinal tract (Zhang et al., 2007).

Variability of the response to Trp can also be associated with the pig sensitivity and response to different kind of stress. Indeed, the effect of Trp on stress sensitivity has been demonstrated when pigs were fed large doses of Trp (Koopmans et al., 2005;

Guzik et al., 2006). However, these effects remained much more discrete or inexistent for dietary supplies within nutritional ranges (Meunier-Salaun et al., 1991).

At last, the effects of sanitary and health statuses are now clearly associated with modifications of Trp metabolism. Plasma Trp was dramatically reduced during an inflammatory response (Melchior et al., 2004; Le Floc’h et al., 2008). Two metabolic pathways could be involved in the disappearance of plasma Trp: the first one is the incorporation of Trp in acute phase protein synthesised by the liver during the inflammatory response (Reeds et al., 1994); the second pathway corresponds to Trp catabolism into kynurenine by the enzyme IDO (Melchior et al., 2005). The induction of IDO pathway has been proposed to be a mechanism that limits the availability of Trp during an inflammatory process and may play crucial roles in the regulation of the immune and inflammatory responses (Pfefferkorn, 1984; Mellor and Munn, 2001).

However, it could be also responsible for reduced Trp availability for growth and protein deposition during systemic (Le Floc’h et al., 2010; de Ridder et al., 2012) and digestive (

Capozzalo et al., 2012)

inflammations.

CONCLUSIONS

The variability of pig responses to dietary Trp level can be explained at different levels. First, based on the same data, the reported response to Trp can vary with the way they are interpreted: unit used to express the requirement, model, criteria that are optimized, usage of tables vs. analyzed AA values. Second, the protocol of an experiment will influence the response: the dietary levels of energy and Lys, the experimental conditions (duration, sanitary and health statuses, stress and interaction with other feed component). Finally, the major part of this apparent variability can be explained and each nutritionist can make his own choice on the Trp requirement knowing the implications on performance and taking into account the economic constraints.

REFERENCES

Adeola O, Ball RO, 1992. Hypothalamic neurotransmitter concentrations and meat quality in stressed pigs offered excess dietary tryptophan and tyrosine. J. Anim. Sci. 70, 1888-1894.

Baker DH, 1986. Problems and pitfalls in animal experiments designed to establish dietary requirements for essential nutrients. J. Nutr. 116, 2339-2349.

Baker DH, Allen NK, Boomgaardt J, Graber G and Norton HW, 1971. Quantitative aspects of D- and L- tryptophan utilization by the young pig. J. Anim. Sci. 33, 42-46.

Barea R, Brossard L, Le Floc’h N, Primot Y, Melchior D and van Milgen J, 2009. The standardized ileal digestible valine-to-lysine requirement ratio is at least seventy percent in post weaned piglets. J. Anim.

Sci. 87, 935-947.

(6)

Boisen S, 2003. Ideal dietary amino acid profiles for pigs. In Amino acids in animal nutrition (ed. JPF D’Mello), pp. 157–168. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.

Capozzalo MM, Kim JC, Htoo JK, de Lange CFM, Mullan BP, Resink JW, Stumbles PA and Pluske JR, 2012. An increased ratio of dietary tryptophan to lysine post weaning improves feed conversion efficiency and elevates plasma tryptophan and kynurenine in the absence of antimicrobials and regardless of infection with enterotoxigenic E. coli.

Proc. XII international symposium on Digestive Physiology in Pigs. Denver, CO, USA.

de Ridder K, Levesque C, Htoo J and de Lange K, 2012. Immune system stimulation reduces the efficiency of tryptophan utilization for body protein deposition in growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. (in press).

Dawkins HC, 1983. Multiple Comparisons Misused: Why so Frequently in Response-Curve Studies?

Biometrics. 39(3), 789-790.

Eder K, Peganova S and Kluge H, 2001. Studies on the tryptophan requirement of piglets. Arch. Anim.

Nutr. 55, 281-297.

Guzik AC, Matthews JO, Kerr BJ, Bidner TD and Southern LL, 2006. Dietary tryptophan effects on plasma an salivary cortisol and meat quality in pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 84, 2251–2259.

Han Y, Chung TK and Baker DH 1993. Tryptophan requirement of pigs in the weight category 10 to 20 kilograms. J. Anim. Sci. 71, 139–143.

Henry Y, Colléaux Y, Ganier P, Saligaut A and Jégo P, 1992. Interactive effects of dietary levels of tryptophan and protein on voluntary feed intake and growth performance in pigs, in relation to plasma free amino acids and hypothalamic serotonin. J Anim Sci 70:1873–1887.

Henry Y, Sève B, Mounier A and Ganier P, 1996. Growth performance and brain neurotransmitters in pigs as affected by tryptophan, protein and sex. J. Anim. Sci. 74, 2700-2710.

Jansman AJM, van Diepen JTM and Melchior D, 2010. The effect of diet composition on tryptophan requirement of young piglets. J. Anim. Sci. 88, 1017-1027.

Koopmans SJ, Ruis M, Dekker R, van Diepen H, Korte M and Mroz Z, 2005. Surplus tryptophan reduces plasma cortisol and noradrenaline concentrations and enhances recovery after social stress in pigs. Physiol. Behav. 85, 469–478.

Le Floc’h N, Melchior D and Sève B, 2008. Dietary tryptophan helps to preserve tryptophan homeostasis in pigs suffering from lung inflammation. J. Anim. Sci. 86, 3473-3479.

Le Floc’h N, Matte JJ, Melchior D, van Milgen J and Sève B, 2010. A moderate inflammation caused by the deterioration of housing conditions modifies Trp metabolism but not Trp requirement for growth of post-weaned piglets. Animal. 4, 1891-1898.

Le Floc’h N, Otten W and Merlot E, 2011. Tryptophan metabolism, from nutrition to potential therapeutic applications. Amino Acids 41, 1195-1205.

Leklem JE, 1971. Quantitative aspects of tryptophan metabolism in humans and other species: a review. Am J Clin Nutr 24, 659–672.

Lewis AJ, Peo ER, Cunningham PJ and Moser BD, 1977. Determination of the optimum dietary proportions of lysine and tryptophan for growing pigs based on growth, food intake and plasma metabolites. J. Nutr. 107, 1369-1376.

Matte JJ, Giguère A, Melchior D and Le Floc’h N, 2008. Is niacin (vitamin B3) a modulator of the effect of supplementary tryptophan on tryptophan metabolism and growth responses in early-weaned pigs?

J. Anim. Sci. Vol. 86, E-Suppl. 2/J. Dairy Sci. Vol. 91, E-Suppl. 1.

Melchior D, Sève B and Le Floc’h N, 2004. Chronic lung inflammation affects plasma amino acid concentrations in pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 82, 1091-1099.

Melchior D, Mézière N, Sève B and Le Floc’h N, 2005. Is tryptophan catabolism increased under indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase activity during chronic lung inflammation in pigs? Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 45, 175-183.

Mellor AL and Munn DH, 2001. Tryptophan catabolism prevents maternal T cells from lethal anti-fetal immune responses. J Reprod Immunol 52, 5–13.

Meunier-Salaun MC, Monnier M, Colléaux Y, Sève B and Henry Y, 1991. Impact of dietary tryptophan and behavioral type on behavior, plasma cortisol, and brain metabolites of young pigs. J. Anim. Sci.

69, 3689-3698.

Morris TR, 1983. The interpretation of response data from animal feeding trials. In Recent advances in animal nutrition (ed. W Haresign), pp. 2-23. Butterworths, London, UK.

Naatjes M, Htoo JK, Tölle KH and Susenbeth A, 2010. Effect of dietary tryptophan to lysine ratio on performance of growing pigs fed wheat–barley or corn–soybean meal based diets. In Energy and protein metabolism and nutrition EAAP Publication No. 127, (ed. G Matteo Crovetto), pp. 605-606.

Pesti GM, Vedenov D, Cason JA and Billard L, 2009. A comparison of methods to estimate nutritional requirements from experimental data. Br. Poult. Sci. 50, 16-32.

(7)

Petersen GI, 2011. Estimation of the ideal standardized ileal digestible tryptophan:lysine ratio in 10 to 20 kg pigs. Ph.D. thesis, degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Animal Sciences in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Pfefferkorn ER, 1984. Interferon gamma blocks the growth of Toxoplasma gondii in human fibroblasts by inducing the host cells to degrade tryptophan. Proc. Natl. Acad. sci. USA. 81, 908-912.

Pomar C, 1995. A systematic approach to interpret the relationship between protein intake and deposition and to evaluate the role of variation on production efficiency in swine. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Determinants of Production Efficiency in Swine. Can. Soc. Anim. Sci., Ottawa, Ont.

Canada, pp 361-375.

Reeds PJ, Fjeld CR and Jahoor F, 1994. Do the differences between the amino acid compositions of acute- phase and muscle proteins have a bearing on nitrogen loss in traumatic states? J. Nutr. 124, 906-910.

Sauvant D, Perez JM and Tran G, 2004. Tables of composition and nutritional value of feed materials, INRA Editions and AFZ. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Paris, France.

Sauvant D, Schmidely P, Daudin JJ and St-Pierre NR, 2008. Meta-analyses of experimental data in animal nutrition. Animal. 2, 1203-1214.

Shearer KD, 2000. Experimental design, statistical analysis and modeling of dietary nutrient requirement studies for fish: a critical review. Aquacult. Nutr. 6, 91-102.

Simongiovanni A, Corrent E, Le Floc’h N and van Milgen J, 2012. Estimation of the tryptophan requirement in piglets by meta-analysis. Animal. 6, 594-602.

Susenbeth A and Lucanus U, 2005. The effect of tryptophan supplementation of diets of restricted and unrestricted fed young pigs. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 89, 331-336.

Trevisi P, Melchior D, Mazzoni M, Casini L, Filippi SD, Minieri L, Lalatta-Costerbosa G and Bosi P, 2009. A tryptophan-enriched diet improves feed intake and growth performance of susceptible weanling pigs orally challenged with Escherichia coli K88. J. Anim. Sci. 87, 148-156.

Zhang H, Jingdong Y, Defa L, Xuan Z and Xilong L, 2007. Tryptophan enhances ghrelin expression and secretion associated with increased food intake and weight gain in weanling pigs. Dom. Anim.

Endocrinol. 33, 47-61.

Références

Documents relatifs

The difference between intracellular (erythrocyte) and extracellular (plasma) contents was much greater for lysine than for threonine. What- ever the diets and the vessels

In the preruminant calf, a functional monogas- tric, lipid composition of muscle tissues can be modulated by nutritional factors, mainly by the lipids of the milk

Since in trial 2 the C8:0 level of 12% of total fatty acids (2% in diet) decreased significantly larval growth, results of both trials suggest a metabolic alteration when C8:0 ex-

Body  zinc  content of  pigs  is  estimated  around 22 mg/kg live weight.  With  conventional diets  (eg  150  mg/kg  Zn)  Zn  excretion  amounts  91%  to  95% 

Effects of dietary protein level on lactational responses of dairy cows to rumen-protected methionine and lysine.. H Rulquin, Catherine Hurtaud,

The slightly higher improvement in milk yield observed in cows receiving HP-FTSB treatment com- pared to those fed a HP-SB supplement (+ 0.7 kg.d –1 ) could be explained by body

The influence and statistical analysis of the metabolism and uptake of quinic acid, nicotinamide and tryptophan in urine treated with 2 X 2 fluid ounces per day 1 hour

In this implementation, however, since these switches are turned on only during the pre-charge phase, the inside plates of the sampling capacitors are initialized to the