• Aucun résultat trouvé

New unabated coal is not compatible with keeping global warming below 2°C Statement by leading climate and energy scientists

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "New unabated coal is not compatible with keeping global warming below 2°C Statement by leading climate and energy scientists"

Copied!
9
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01692559

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01692559

Submitted on 12 Feb 2018

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

New unabated coal is not compatible with keeping

global warming below 2°C Statement by leading climate

and energy scientists

Ogunalde Davidson, Peter C. Frumhoff, Niklas Höhne, Jean Charles

Hourcade, Mark Jaccard, Jiang Kejun, Mikiko Kainuma, Claudia Kemfert,

Emilio La Rovere, Felix Christian Matthes, et al.

To cite this version:

Ogunalde Davidson, Peter C. Frumhoff, Niklas Höhne, Jean Charles Hourcade, Mark Jaccard, et al.. New unabated coal is not compatible with keeping global warming below 2°C Statement by leading climate and energy scientists. 2013. �hal-01692559�

(2)

New unabated

1

coal is not

compatible with keeping

global warming below 2°C

Statement by leading climate and energy scientists

Prof. Ogunlade Davidson, University of Sierra Leone, Sierra Leone

Prof. Peter C. Frumhoff, Union of Concerned Scientists, USA

Dr. Niklas Höhne, Ecofys, Germany/The Netherlands

Dr. Jean-Charles Hourcade,

Prof. Mark Jaccard,

Dr. Jiang Kejun,

Commission, China

Dr. Mikiko Kainuma,

Prof. Claudia Kemfert,

Prof. Emilio La Rovere,

Dr. Felix Christian Matthes, y

Dr. Michael MacCracken,

Dr. Bert Metz,

Prof. José Moreira, Prof. William Moomaw,

Prof. Nebojsa Nakicenovic,

Dr. Shuzo Nishioka,

Prof. Keywan Riahi, Dr. Hans-Holger Rogner, Dr. Jayant Sathaye,

Prof. John Schellnhuber,

Dr. Robert N. Schock,

Prof. P.R. Shukla,

Prof. Ralph E.H. Sims,

Prof. Jeffrey Steinfeld,

Prof. Wim C. Turkenburg, Copernicus Institute on Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, The Netherlands

Dr. Tony Weir,

Prof. Harald Winkler,

counted as unabated coal, unless equipped with CCS.

(3)

1. U

nabated

coal

is

not

a

low

carbon

technology

2

2 capture and storage.

2

2e/kWh. Renewable energy technologies are emissions-free in operation,

and even over their full lifecycle result in much lower emissions. Typical values for lifecycle emissions for

2 2

incur emissions levels below those of unabated gas plants, and therefore be considered a low carbon technology2. The only way that coal plants can be part of a low carbon future is for all new coal plants

to include CCS from the outset.

2 needs to be stored compared with 2 could be a distinct advantage.

ELECTRICITY GENERATION TECHNOLOGIES POWERED BY RENEWABLE RESOURCES

Bi o p o w e r Ph oto vo lta ic s C o n c e n tr a tin g S o la r P o w e r Co a l Oi l N a tu ra l G a s G e ot h e rm a l E n e rg y Hy d ro p o w e r N u c le a r E n e rg y O c e a n E n e rg y W in d E n e rg y –1,250 –1,500 –1,000 750 250 –250 –750 –500 0 500 1,750 1,250 1,000 1,500 2,000 Li fe c yc le G re e n h o u se G a s E m is si o n s ( g C O2 e/ kW h)

ELECTRICITY GENERATION TECHNOLOGIES POWERED BY NON-RENEWABLE RESOURCES

*Avoided emissions, no removal of GHGs from the atmosphere * Maximum 75th Percentile Median 25th Percentile Minimum Single Estimates with CCS

(4)

2. a

voiding

dangeroUs

climate

change

reqUires

that

the

majority

of

fossil

fUel

reserves

need

to

stay

UndergroUnd

3

harder to substitute.

4 GtCO 2

The largest portion of this very small carbon budget will be needed in sectors where there are no readily technologies with near zero emissions.

Building new unabated coal plants will extend the period during which coal continues to be converted into atmospheric CO2

2 persists in the atmosphere for

many hundreds of years.

2

4 The carbon budget for a 2o

2 2 2. Oil 982 GtCO2 2°C budget 1050 GtCO2 Gas 690 GtCO2 Coal 2,191 GtCO2

FOSSIL FUEL RESERVES

(5)

3. c

Urrent

trends

in

coal

Use

are

harboUring

catastrophic

climate

change

include extreme heat waves, declining global food stocks and a sea-level rise affecting hundreds of increasing risks for food production potentially leading to higher under and malnutrition rates; many dry regions becoming dryer, wet regions wetter; unprecedented heat waves in many regions, especially in the tropics; substantially exacerbated water scarcity in many regions; increased intensity of tropical cyclones; and irreversible loss of biodiversity” .

P rim a ry e n e rg y d e m a n d fo r c o a l ( th o u sa n d M tc e ) 11 10 9 8 7 6 4 5 3 2 1 0 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 Medium-term coal market report

IEA scenarios:

6DS 4DS 2DS

(6)

4. t

o

keep

global

warming

to

less

than

2°c

above

pre

-

indUstrial

,

Use

of

Unabated

coal

has

to

go

down

in

absolUte

terms

from

now

on

There is no room in the remaining carbon budget for building new unabated coal power plants, even

temperature increase to less than 2°C above pre-industrial levels. All of these scenarios support the strong reductions in energy demand and early closure of existing coal plants there will be no room for

are simultaneously shut down before the end of their economic lifetime. For instance, the IEA “4 coal plants due to Essentially, this scenario assumes the early closure of more than two subcritical plants for each

of unabated coal. o EJ 0 2005 2030 2050 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 Geothermal Solar Wind Hydro Nuclear Gas wCCS Gas woCCS Oil Coal wCCS Coal woCCS Biomass wCCS Biomass woCCS I I II II III III GEA-efficiency GEA-mix GEA-supply I II III Coal woCCS set to decline by 80–96% by 2050

(7)

5. a

lternatives

are

available

and

affordable

The cost of electricity from renewable energy sources has decreased dramatically. In many places it is now competitive with fossil fuel-based electricity (see Figure cost of fossil fuel electricity will increase and that of renewable electricity will decrease further in the future (Frankfurt School UNEP Collaborating Centre and As a result, investments in new renewable energy-based electricity systems have increased enormously: of all the new electric power capacity that came on stream renewable sources (excluding UNEP Collaborating Centre When the external costs due to climate change and the health impacts of air pollution are considered, electricity from renewable energy sources is almost always

2012 2020 2012 2020 2012 2020 2012 2020 2012 2020 2012 2020 2012 2020 2012 2020 2012 2020 2012 2020 2012 2020 2012 2020 2012 2020 Wind onshore Wind offshore Solar PV-grid CSP PT (no storage) CSP PT (6 h storage) CSP ST (6-15 h storage) Biomass-stoker/ BFB/CFB Biomass-gasification Biomass-AD Biomass-co-firing Biomass non-OECD Hydropower Geothermal 2011 USD/kWh Range of fossil fuel power OECD

0.1

(8)

6. p

Ublic

financing

institUtions

and

regUlatory

agencies

are

reining

in

Unabated

coal

,

bUt

more

is

needed

be something every government considers for itself in terms of domestic developments and (for those strong carbon pricing signals that are credible in the long term, regulatory action banning the construction of unabated coal plants is also warranted to prevent further lock-in of future emissions. This would avoid large amounts of capital being invested in assets that will need to be abandoned to achieve a 2°C pathway.

Health Climate Change

RENEWABLE ENERGY (B) Solar Thermal (B) Geothermal (B) Wind 2.5 MW Offshore (B) Wind 1.5 MW Onshore (C) Wind Offshore (B) Hydro 300 kW (B) PV (2030) (B) PV (2000) (C) PV Southern Europe (C) Biomass CHP 6 MWel (D) Biomass Grate Boiler ESP 5 and 10 MW Fuel

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

COAL FIRED PLANTS

(A) Existing US Plants

(C) Hard Coal Postcom. CCS (C) Lignite Oxyfuel CCS

(A) Existing US Plants (C) Natural Gas Comb.C (C) Natural Gas Postcom.CCS

External costs (US Cent/kWh)

(9)

R

EFERENCES

New York. http://srren.ipcc-wg3.de/report/IPCC_SRREN_Full_Report.pdf

Angel Gurría, London, October 9. http://www.oecd.org/about/secretary-general/The-climate-challenge-achieving-zero-emissions.htm

Assessment -- Toward a Sustainable Future, (Johansson, T.B., Patwardhan, A., Nakicenovic, N.,

pathways_hires.pdf

warmer_world_must_be_avoided.pdf

Références

Documents relatifs

We have performed a survey of its genome-wide diversity using single-worm whole genome sequencing of 223 individuals sampled from 19 isolates spanning five continents.. We find an

Changes in the zonal mean vertical pressure velocity (hPa d − 1 ) in the stabilized CO 2 doubling simulation (2CO 2 STA ), induced by mean meridional advection (ADV), heat

We have used a terrestrial ecosystem model that includes permafrost carbon dynamics, inhibition of respiration in frozen soil layers, vertical mixing of soil carbon from surface

The interpretation of TOF-SIMS data obtained by COSIMA will be a complex task due to the intimate mixture of minerals and organic matter expected in cometary

In spite of the difficulties involved in working with the families of "hard core" delinquent children, this study has provided considerable evidence of the effectiveness

Here, we investigate changes in temperature and precipitation extremes over the West and Central Africa subregions for an increase of global mean temperature of 1.5 ◦ C and 2 ◦ C

For a long-wavelength calculation of the acoustic radiation forces, the Gor’kov potential of hollow, air-filled particles and particles with solid or fluid core and shell is

We followed 69 representative families of transposons over the course of the EpiLC differentiation and observed that virtually every families became heavily