C OMPOSITIO M ATHEMATICA
T AMMO T OM D IECK
A finiteness theorem for the burnside ring of a compact Lie group
Compositio Mathematica, tome 35, n
o1 (1977), p. 91-97
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=CM_1977__35_1_91_0>
© Foundation Compositio Mathematica, 1977, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Compositio Mathematica » (http:
//http://www.compositio.nl/) implique l’accord avec les conditions géné- rales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infrac- tion pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
91
A FINITENESS THEOREM FOR THE BURNSIDE RING OF A COMPACT LIE GROUP
Tammo tom Dieck Noordhoff International Publishing
Printed in the Netherlands
Let G be a compact Lie group and let
A(G)
be its Burnsidering [6].
We show that after
inverting
a finite number ofprimes
thering A(G)
is
generated by idempotent
elements. Thefollowing
result(Theorem 1)
about compact Lie groups is basic for ourinvestigations.
Let H be a
subgroup
of G(subgroups
willalways
beclosed),
letNH be its normalizer in G and denote
NHIH by
WH. If K is acompact Lie group let
Ko
be its component of the unit element.THEOREM 1: There exists an
integer
b such thatfor
each closedsubgroups
Hof
G theindex [WH : (WH)ol
is less than b.Let
Ac(G) be
theintegral
closure ofA(G)
in its totalquotient ring.
THEOREM 2: There exists an
integer
n > 0 such thatnAc(G)
CA(G).
The minimal such n is the least common
multiple of
the numbers WHwhere H runs
through
allsubgroups
such that WH isfinite.
The minimal
integer n(G) provided by
Theorem 1replaces
theorder of the finite group if one extends the
general
Artin induction theorem(see
Dress[7],
Theorem2,
p.204)
to compact Lie groups, whence itsimportance.
1. Normalizers
1.1. We prove in this section Theorem 1. The
proof proceeds
inthree steps: We first reduce to the case that WH is
finite;
then we reduce to the case that H isfinite;
andfinally
show that for finite H92
with finite WH the order of WH is
uniformly
bounded.Let H be a closed
subgroup
of G(notation:
HG).
Let Aut(H)
be the
automorphism
group of H and In(H)
the closed normalsubgroup
of innerautomorphisms.
The group AutH/In
H is discrete.Mapping
n E NH to theconjugation automorphism c(n) :
h Hnhn-’
of H induces a
homomorphism
NH --> AutH/In H
with kernelZH . H,
where ZH denotes the centralizer of H. HenceNHI ZH .
Hbeing
acompact subgroup
of the discrete group AutH/In
H is finite.We conclude
LEMMA 1: WH is
finite if
andonly if ZH/(ZH
~H)
isfinite.
LEMMA 2: A compact Lie group contains
only
afinite
numberof conjugacy
classes(K)
where K is the centralizerof
a closedsubgroup.
PROOF: Let G act on M = G via
conjugation
G x MM : (g, m) ~ gmg -1.
If H G then the fixedpoint
setMH
is thecentralizer ZH. A compact diff erentiable G-manif old has finite orbit type. Hence there exist
finitely
manyconjugacy
classes(Hl),
...,(Hk)
such that for any closed
subgroup
HMH = MK
and(K) = (Hi)
for asuitable i.
LEMMA 3: For any H G the group ZH . H has
finite
index in its normalizer.PROOF: We have
Z(ZH . H) ZH
ZH .H ;
hence the assertion follows from Lemma 1.If n E G normalizes H then also ZH and hence ZH. H. We therefore have
Using
Lemma 3 and the existence of an upper bound for the setwe obtain
LEMMA 4: There exists an
integer
c such thatfor
all H G we haveNow we are able to obtain the first reduction of our
problem.
Fromthe exact sequence 1 ---->
ZH/ZH
fl H --> WH -NHI ZH .
H - 1 we seethat
WH/(WH)0 ---> NHIZH -
H has a kernel which is aquotient
ofZH/(ZH )o.
Lemmas 2 and 4 then show thatis bounded. But note that Lemma 4
requires
a bound for the setF(G).
1.2. We show
by
inductionover IGIGOI
and dim G thatF( G )
has anupper bound a =
a(G/Go,
dimG).
For finite G we can take a= IGI.
Suppose
that an upper bounda(K/Ko,
dimK)
isgiven
for all K with dim K dim G. Let~(G) = {H GI
WHfinitel. Suppose
H E~(G)
is not finite. We consider theprojection
p :NHO--> NHo/Ho
=: U.Let V be the normalizer of
HIHO
in U. Then WH =VI(HIHO)
andtherefore
HI Ho E ~(U).
Since dim U dim G we obtainby
inductionhypothesis
We show that the
possible
valuesfor 1 UI Uol
are finite in number. The groupNHO
is the normalizer of a connectedsubgroup. By [8],
Ch.VII,
Lemma3.2,
there areonly
a finite number ofconjugacy
classesof such
subgroups.
Hence for agiven
G thepossible 1 UI Uol
arebounded, say |UI Uol ~ m(G).
We haveinequalities
where
No
means normalizer inGo. By
the classificationtheory
ofcompact
connected Lie groups there areonly
a finite number in each dimension. Hence there exists a boundf or 1 us Uoi depending only
onIGIGol
and dim G. This proves the induction step as far as the non-finite H in1(G)
are concerned.1.3. Let H E
~(G)
be finite. Leto-(G)
be the set of finitesubgroups
of G. We use the
following
classical theorem of Jordan.LEMMA 5: There exists an
integer j
=j(IGIGol,
dimG)
with thefollowing properties:
To each H E03C3(G)
there exists an abelian nor-mal
subgroup AH of
H such thatIHI AH | ~ j.
Moreover theAH
can bechosen such that H K
implies AH AK.
PROOF:
Boothby
andWang [2].
Wolf[9].
In these referencesonly
connected groups are considered. The
straightforward
extension tonon-connected groups we leave to the reader.
94
If H E
1(G)
is finite then also K : = NH is finite andby
Lemma 1K E ~(G).
Wechoose j
=j(IGIGol,
dimG)
andAH, AK according
toLemma 5. We have
IK/HI~IKIAKI.IAKIH n AK 1~ JIAKIH nAKI.
Hence it is sufficient to find a bound
for AK/H n AKI.
Consider theexact sequence 1
~ S ~ H ~ AH ~1.
Theconjugation c(a)
with a EAK
is trivial onAH,
becauseAK > AH,
and hencec(a)
induces anautomorphism
of S. SinceISI ~ j
thisautomorphism
has order at mostJ
= j !,
i.e.c(ar
is theidentity
on S andAH
for a suitable r ~ J. Thegroup of such
automorphisms
modulo thesubgroups
of inner au-tomorphisms by
elements ofAH
isisomorphic
toH’(S; AH),
with Sacting
onAH by conjugation.
Since this group is annihilatedby ISI
wesee that
c(as)
is an innerautomorphism by
an element ofAH
for a suitables ~ J |S| jJ.
In other words:aSh-IEZH.
Hence it is suffi- cient to find a bound for the order ofAK n ZHIH
nAK n
ZH.Let
Ul = AK n ZH. By [3],
Théorème1, U,
is contained in thenormalizer NT of a maximal torus of G. Put U =
u,
n T. ThenIUdUI ~ IGIGollw(Go) I
wherew( Go)
denotes theWeyl
group ofGo.
We estimate the order of U. Since U is abelian we have U ZU.
Moreover H ZU
by
definition of ZH. Since U is contained in ZU it is contained in the center C : = CZU of ZU. The inclusion H ZUimplies
C NH. Hence C is finite.We
proceed
to show that for the order of a finite centerC(G)
of Gthere exists a bound
depending only
onIGIGol
and dim G. We letG/Go
act
by conjugation
onC(Go).
ThenC(G)
nGo
is the fixedpoint
set ofthis action. We have
C(Go)
= A xTi,
where A is a finite abelian groupand T,
a torus. The group A is the center of asemisimple
group andtherefore, by
the classificationtheory
of these groups,lAI
is boundedby
a constant cdepending only
on dim G. The exactcohomology
sequence associated to the universal
covering 0 ---> -u, T, --> V ---> T, --> 0 shows,
that the fixedpoint
set of the action ofG7G’o
onTl
=C(Go)o
isisomorphic
toH1(G/Go, 7TI Tl),
hence its order is boundedby
a con-stant d
depending only
onIGIGOI
and the rank ofTI.
HenceIC(G)I ~ 1 GI G,l cd.
Finally
we have to show that for thepossible
groups ZU the orderIZUI(ZU)ol
is bounded.U is contained in a maximal torus of G. Therefore ZU is a
subgroup
of maximal rank and(ZU)o
a connectedsubgroup
ofmaximal rank.
By [4]
there existonly finitely
manyconjugacy
classesof connected
subgroups
of maximal rank. We haveThere are
only finitely
manypossibilities
for normalizersNo(ZU)
inGo
of(ZU)o.
This finishes the
proof
of Theorem 1.2. The
integral
closure ofA(G)
Let 0 = Spec (A(G) 0 Q)
be theprime
idealspectrum
ofA(G) @z Q
= :Ao
with Zariskitopology. By [6],
Theorem4,
theprime
ideals of
Ao correspond bijectively
to kernels ofring homomorphisms Ao- Q. Theref ore 0
is atotally
disconnected compact Hausdorff space([5], §4.
Ex.16; [1],
Ch. 3. Ex.11 ).
LEMMA 6:
(1)
For eacha E Ao
the mapCPa:cf~Q:cP~cp(a) is locally
constant.If
a EA(G)
thencp(a)
E Z.(2)
LetC(o, Q)
be thering of locally
constantfunctions ~ --> Q.
Thering homomorphism a:AO~C(O,Q):a~o,, is
anisomorphism.
Theimage aA(G)
iscontained in
C(O,Z). (3)
The mapA(G)-->Ao:aF-->a~l
is theinclusion
of
A into its totalquotient ring.
The map a :A(G) --> C(o, Z)
is the inclusionof A(G)
into theintegral
closureof A(G)
inAo ~ C(~, Q).
PROOF:
(1)
For k EQ
the setcp-1(k)
is closed in~, by
definition of the Zariskitopology.
SinceAo
is anabsolutely
fiatring,
this set is alsoopen
by [5], §4.
Ex. 16.b.Hence cpa
is continuous and there existonly
a finite number ofnon-empty
setscp-1(k), because 0
is compact.A
homomorphism Ao ~ Q
is induced from ahomomorphism A(G) ~ Z, by [6]
Theorem 4.(2)
Since the localizations ofAo
at itsprime
ideals arecanonically isomorphic
toQ,
we canidentify C(o, Q)
with thering
of sections of the structure sheaf ofAo.
Then acorresponds
to the canonical map ofAo
into thisring,
hence a is anisomorphism.
(3)
To form the totalquotient ring
we have to invert the elements which are not zero divisors. HenceAo
is contained in the totalquotient ring.
If x EC(o, Q) ~ Ao
is not a zero divisor then it is alocally
constant function without zeros, hence a unit. ThereforeC(o, Q)
is its own totalquotient ring.
Since alocally
constantfunction ~ -->
Z takesonly finitely
many values thering C(o, Z)
isgenerated by idempotent
elements henceintegral
over anysubring.
Under the
isomorphism
a thering C(o, Z) corresponds
tola
EAolcp E cf> cp(a) E Z}.
Ifx E Ao
isintegral
overA( G )
thenç(x)
isintegral
overZ,
hencecp(x)
E Z anda(x)
EC(o, Z).
96
Let
A,(G)
denote thepre-image
ofC(o, Z)
under a. We recall thatA(G)
isadditively
the free abelian group onhomogeneous
spacesG/H
where H runsthrough
acomplete
system ofnon-conjugate subgroups
H of G with finite index in their normalizer([6],
Theorem1).
Letl(G)
denote the set ofconjugacy
classes(H)
ofsubgroups
Hof G with finite WH =
NHIH.
LEMMA 7:
Ac(G)
isadditively
the free abelian group with basis x(,) := 1 WH 1 - 1 GIH, (H)
E~(G).
PROOF: The elements X(H) are contained in
Ac(G): Suppose cp e 0
isgiven.
Then there exists(K) e £(G)
such thatcp(x 0 r)
=RX(XK)
where X
denotes the Euler characteristic andxK
the K fixedpoint
setof any manifold
representing
x. But WH actsfreely
as a G-automor-phisms
group onGIH,
hence also onGIH K.
ThereforeX(GIHK)
isdivisible
by |WH| and
we see thatCP(X(H») E Z
for all cp.By
definitionof
Ac(G)
this means x(H) EAc(G).
The elements X(H) are
obviously linearly independent
over Z. Wehave to show that any x E
Ac(G)
is anintegral linear
combination of the x(H). In any case we have anexpression
x = 1 rHx(H) with rational rH. Take(L)
E~(G)
maximal with respect to inclusion such thatrL~0. Then ~rHIWHI-1x(GIHL)EZ.
ButG/HL=cP
for(H)~(L), rH~0;
andX(GILL)=IWHI.
ThereforerL E Z.
Weapply
the sameargument
to x - rLx(L) andcomplete
theproof by
induction.Lemma 7 and Theorem 1
give
aproof
of Theorem 2.REFERENCES
[1] M. F. ATIYAH and I. G. MACDONALD: Introduction to Commutative Algebra.
Addison-Wesley Publ. Comp. 1969.
[2] W. BOOTHBY and H.-C. WANG: On the finite subgroups of connected Lie groups.
Comment. Math. Helv. 39 (1964) 281-294.
[3] A. BOREL et J.-P. SERRE: Sur certain sous groupes des groupes de Lie compacts.
Comment. Math. Helv. 27 (1953) 128-139.
[4] A. BOREL et J. DE SIEBENTHAL: Les sous-groupes fermès de rang maximum des groupes de Lie clos. Comment. Math. Helv. 23 (1949) 200-221.
[5] N. BOURBAKI: Algèbre commutative, Chapitre 2. Hermann, Paris 1961.
[6] T. TOM DIECK: The Burnside Ring of a Compact Lie Group I. Math. Ann. 215
(1975) 235-250.
[7] A. DRESS: Contributions to the theory of induced representations. Springer Lecture
Notes 342, (1973) 183-240.
[8] Seminar on Transformation Groups. Ed. A. Borel et al. Princeton University Press
1960.
[9] J. A. WOLF: Spaces of Constant Curvature. McGraw-Hill, New York 1967.
(Oblatum 26-V-1976) Math. Institut
34 Gôttingen Bunsenstrasse 3-5 BRD