• Aucun résultat trouvé

(2) Show that the constant functorcstadmits a left adjoint functorLand describe it

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "(2) Show that the constant functorcstadmits a left adjoint functorLand describe it"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Master 2: Homotopy Theories 2021-2022

Worksheet 5

THE CATEGORY OF SIMPLICIAL SETS

Exercise 1(Sets vs simplicial sets).

We consider the functorcst :Set→sSetwhich assigns the constant simplicial set XnBX, di =id, and si=id

to any setX.

(1) Show that this functor is full, faithful, and representable.

We denote byC the cosimplicial set which represents this constant functor.

(2) Show that the constant functorcstadmits a left adjoint functorLand describe it.

(3) Show that the constant functorcstadmits a right adjoint functorRand describe it.

(4) Show that the category Set of sets is equivalent to the category sSet0 of simplicial sets of dimension0.

———— ————

Exercise 2(Toward the Dold–Kan correspondence).

TheMoore complexCX of a simplicial setX admits for chains in degreen the freeZ-module on the set ofn-simplicies, i.e.CnXBZXn, and for differential the alternated sum of the faces:

dB

n

X

i=0

(−1)idi : ZXn→ZXn−1. (1) Show thatd2=0.

(2) Show that the graded module DX whose chains in degree n are made up of the free Z- module on the set of degeneraten-simpliciesDnX BZ Xn\NXn

is a chain sub-complex of the Moore complex, i.e.DX⊂CX.

Thenormalised Moore complexNXof a simplicial setXis the quotient chain complex ofCXbyDX, i.e.

NX:=(CX/DX,d) .

(3) Show that both the Moore chain complexCand the normalised Moore chain complexN

form a functor from simplicial sets to chain complexes overZ.

(4) Show that the normalised Moore chain complexNadmit a right adjoint functor and describe it.

Remark. One can prove that the canonical projection CX NX is a homotopy equivalence.

The normalised Moore functorN is part of an equivalence of categories between the category of simplicial abelian groups and non-negatively graded chain complexes overZ.

———— ————

Exercise 3 (Categories and simplicial sets). We denote by Cat the category of small categories.

For any n ∈ N, consider the category Cat[n] := {0 → 1 → · · · → n} associated to the poset 0<1<· · ·<n.

(1) Endow these categories Cat[n], for n ∈ N, with a cosimplicial structure in order to get a cosimplicial (small) category denoted byCat[•].

1

(2)

(2) Describe the simplicial representation functor NBRCat[]: Cat −→ sSet

C 7−→ HomCat Cat[•],C

associated to this cosimplicial category. Its upshotNCis usually called thenerve of a category C.

(3) Show that the nerve functor admits a left adjoint functor and describe it.

(4) Show that the nerve functor is full and faithful. How do you interpret this result?

———— ————

Exercise 4(Classifying space).

Let Gbe a group. It gives rise to a category made up of one object ∗with set of automorphisms given byG. Theclassifying spaceBGof the groupGis the simplicial set defined by the nerve of this category.

(1) Describe the classifying spaceBGof a groupG.

We consider the collection (EG)n B Gn+1of sets, forn > 0, endowed with the following face and degeneracy maps

di(g0, . . . ,gn)B(g0, . . . ,gDi, . . . ,gn) et si(g0, . . . ,gn)B(g0, . . . ,gi,gi, . . . ,gn). We denote this data simply byEG.

(1) Show that the assignmentEGdefines a functor from the category of groups to the category of simplicial sets.

(2) Show that the functorE :Grp→sSetadmits a left adjoint and describe it.

(3) Anyn-simplex(EG)n=Gn+1 admits a left action from the groupGunder the formula g.(g0, . . . ,gn)B(gg0, . . . ,ggn).

Show this endowsEGwith a structure of a simplicialG-module.

(4) We consider the orbits under this action with the induced face and degeneracy maps:

EG/GB (EG)n/G=Gn+1/G,¯di,¯si .

Show thatEG/Gis a simplicial set isomorphic to the classifying spaceBG.

(5) Show thatEG EG/G BGis a surjective morphism of simplicial sets and compute its

"fiber".

———— ————

Bruno Vallette:[email protected]. Web page: www.math.univ-paris13.fr/∼vallette/.

2

Références

Documents relatifs

In this paper we show that every (real or complex) analytic function germ, defined on a possibly singular analytic space, is topologically equivalent to a polynomial function

Also use the formulas for det and Trace from the

Let us quote Chakerian-Groemer whose chapter on bodies of constant width in the Encyclopedia of convexity, see [6], is a well-known reference (see also [15]): “Mayer in [16] gives

Recent unpublished work of Haselgrove in England is being devoted to the deter- mination of the early roots to considerable accuracy by electronic digital

In the first part, by combining Bochner’s formula and a smooth maximum principle argument, Kr¨ oger in [15] obtained a comparison theorem for the gradient of the eigenfunctions,

Setting up the ATE software for data calls involves installing the Telephone Manager and ATE software and creating data profiles to communicate with other

After the terminal has been placed in the graphic mode of operation, control codes are utilized to provide addressing of the other graphic memories for data

But you can open them from inside easily without the clerk having to buzz you out because there's a circuit that detects when a person touches the exit bar that de- energizes