HAL Id: cea-02508894
https://hal-cea.archives-ouvertes.fr/cea-02508894
Submitted on 16 Mar 2020
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
clearances, application to the SFR fuel pins bundle.
Catterou Thomas, Bruno Cochelin, Stéphane Bourgeois, V. Blanc, Guillaume Ricciardi
To cite this version:
Catterou Thomas, Bruno Cochelin, Stéphane Bourgeois, V. Blanc, Guillaume Ricciardi. Dynamic analysis of a multi-contact problem with clearances, application to the SFR fuel pins bundle.. EU-RODYN 2017 - 10th international conference on structural dynamics, Sep 2017, Rome, Italy. �cea-02508894�
pins bundle.
CATTEROU Thomas, PhD student.
thomas.catterou@cea.fr
Bruno Cochelin, Stephane Bourgeois –
LMA Marseille, France
Victor Blanc, Guillaume Ricciardi
– CEA Cadarache, France
September, 11
th2017
EURODYN2017 – X
thinternational conference on structural
Goal
Caracterize the non-linear dynamical behavior of the
ASTRID pins bundle with mounting gaps for different
loads (handling, transport, earthquake).
Ensure the integrity of the first
containment barrier.
Introduction
Wrapper tube Clad Spacer wire LOWER PLENUM SPACER FUEL PELLETS SPRINGA fuel pin
Ø~1cm L~2mA large number of pins (217) and localized contact zone
(~15000)
Hypothesis:
o Timoshenko beams o Small deformations
Methodology of numerical method validation
“Toy model” Semi-analytical and experimental validation Simplified model One row of pins
Experimental validation
Full model
Final validation
Numerical method (Cast3M finite element
software)
Explicit integration scheme (central difference method)
Modal analysis without contacts
Resolution of the fundamental equation of the dynamic on
the modal base
Modal recombination for each time step on contact points
to estimate contact forces 𝐹
𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑐𝑘Sub-structuring for the full model
Semi-analytical method
Modal basis analysis of two basic problems
Resolution of the fundamental equation of the dynamic on
the modal base
Clamped beam colliding on a spring
𝑋
𝑓𝑥 , 𝜔
𝑓𝑋
𝑠𝑥 , 𝜔
𝑠ሷ𝑞
𝑖+ 2𝜉
𝑖𝜔
𝑖ሶ𝑞
𝑖+ 𝜔
𝑖2𝑞 = 0
𝑞
𝑖(𝑡) = 𝑒
−𝜉𝑖𝜔𝑖𝑡𝐴
𝑖cos 𝜔
𝑑𝑡 + 𝐵
𝑖sin 𝜔
𝑑𝑡
𝐴
𝑖=
Ωu0.Φ𝑖 ΩΦ𝑖.Φ𝑖; 𝐵
𝑖=
Ω𝑣0.Φ𝑖 𝜔𝑖Ω Φ𝑖.Φ𝑖+
𝜉𝑖 𝜔𝑖 1−𝜉𝑖2𝐴
𝑖; 𝜔
𝑑= 𝜔
𝑖(1 − 𝜉
i2).
𝑢
𝑓𝑥, 𝑡 = Σ𝑋
𝑓𝑖𝑥 𝑞
𝑓𝑖(𝑡)
𝑢
𝑠𝑥, 𝑡 = Σ𝑋
𝑠𝑖𝑥 𝑞
𝑠𝑖(𝑡)
Switching time ?
Semi-analytical method
Root finding algorithm to find the switching time
𝑡
𝑛+1= 𝑡
𝑛−
𝑓 𝑡𝑛 𝑡𝑛−𝑡𝑛−1𝑓 𝑡𝑛 −𝑓 𝑡𝑛−1
(Secant method)
Creation of the solution
Initial conditions
𝑢
0, 𝑣
0, 𝑡
0If 𝑢
0𝐿 > 0
Clamped−spring
solution
Clamped-free
solution
If 𝑢
0𝐿 < 0
Root finding algorithm
Identification of contact
or take off instant
Loop
Solution building
between two contacts
Results : displacements
Clamped beam colliding on a spring
𝑅
𝑓𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑛𝑐= 10 / 𝑅
𝑘= 3000
𝑅
𝑓𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑛𝑐= 300 / 𝑅
𝑘= 3000
Analytical
Numerical
Analytical
Numerical
𝑅
𝑓𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑛𝑐= 300 / 𝑅
𝑘= 5
𝑅
𝑘=
𝐾𝑠𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝐾𝑏𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔,
Hardness of the contact
𝑅
𝑓𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑛𝑐=
𝑓
𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑓
1Validation – Frequency truncation
𝑅
𝑓𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑛𝑐=
𝑓
𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑓
1 Err = max( Γ𝑛𝑢𝑚 − Γ𝑟𝑒𝑓 ) max Γ𝑛𝑢𝑚 , Γ𝑟𝑒𝑓Local error when
𝑡
𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑐𝑡≈ 𝑡
𝑏𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑤𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑠reference = semi-analytic method
𝑅
𝑘=
𝐾𝑠𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔Validation - Frequency truncation
𝑅
𝑓𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑛𝑐= 10
𝑅
𝑓𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑛𝑐= 300
Err = max( Γ𝑛𝑢𝑚 − Γ𝑟𝑒𝑓 ) max Γ𝑛𝑢𝑚 , Γ𝑟𝑒𝑓Analytical
Numerical
Analytical
Numerical
A high frequency truncation is necessary when 𝑅𝑘 is high.
Validation – Time step
A small time step is needed for a high 𝑅𝑘
A small time step doesn’t mean a greater accuracy.
Err
= max( Γ𝑛𝑢𝑚 − Γ𝑟𝑒𝑓 ) max Γ𝑛𝑢𝑚 , Γ𝑟𝑒𝑓
𝑓
𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑛𝑐Frequency
truncation
<<
<
𝟏 𝝅 𝒌𝒔 𝒎 𝟏 𝟒𝒅𝒕𝑑𝑡
Time step
<
<
𝑑𝑥
Spatial
discretization
<
<
0,8 𝑑𝑡𝑚𝑎𝑥𝑖 • 𝟒𝒇𝟏 𝒕𝒓𝒖𝒏𝒄 • 𝝅 𝟐 𝒎 𝒌𝒔∅
𝝀𝒎𝒊𝒏𝒊 𝟒 = 𝒄𝒃𝒆𝒏𝒅 𝟒𝒇𝒕𝒓𝒖𝒏𝒄Clamped beam colliding on a spring
𝑭𝒓𝒆𝒒𝒖𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒚 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒔𝒉𝒐𝒄𝒌 𝒐𝒇 𝒂 𝒎𝒂𝒔𝒔 𝒎 𝑬𝒙𝒑𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒊𝒕 𝒔𝒄𝒉𝒆𝒎𝒆 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒅𝒊𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑨 𝒔𝒎𝒂𝒍𝒍 𝒕𝒊𝒎𝒆 𝒔𝒕𝒆𝒑 𝒅𝒐𝒆𝒔𝒏’𝒕 𝒊𝒏𝒗𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆 𝒂 𝒈𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒓 𝒂𝒄𝒄𝒖𝒓𝒂𝒄𝒚 𝑻𝒊𝒎𝒆 𝒔𝒉𝒐𝒄𝒌 𝑬𝒙𝒑𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒊𝒕 𝒔𝒄𝒉𝒆𝒎𝒆 𝑩𝒆𝒏𝒅𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒘𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒑𝒂𝒈𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏
Finite element
model
Fuel pins : Timoshenko beams Wrapper tube : Shells
One row modeled (~500 contact zones)
Sectional view of the assembly
Contact zone
WT edges
Fue
l reg
io
n
Application to the SFR
tube bundle
Release of an assembly in bending on a rigid stop
Several phenomena at different time scale WT contact time (~20ms)
WT breathing waves (~15ms)
Compression waves in the bundle (~3ms) Bending waves in the bundle (~5ms)
Local phenomena in a contact zone if there is a gap (<0.5ms)
WT contact time
Compression waves go back and forth
WT « Breathing » modes
Dynamical behavior of a tube bundle
Peak force depending on clearance
Clearance (m) Pe ak Forc e (N ) Prestressing Linear decrease withclearance
Similar to a Newton’s cradle behavior
Donahue 2008 Hutzler 2004
Conclusion and outlook
Analytical validation of a contact problem
Semi-analytical solutionNumerical method choice
Creation of a validity domain of the numerical model
Application to a pin bundle
Several phenomena highligthed.
Beneficial impact of clearance size for an homogeneous distribution.
Outlooks
Study of heterogeneous distribution of clearances. Experimental validation
Annex 1 Timoshenko Beam
Rationale of the selection of timohenko beam.
0 5 10 15 20 25 10 20 36 50 100 (Fr éq -Fr éq 3D )/ Fr éq (% ) L/R POUT TIMO Timo 0,5 COQUE Théorie