Proceedings of Engineering & Technology (PET)
Merabet. Hichem
Welding and NDT research center (CSC) BP 64 Cheraga, Algeria
h.merabet@csc.dz Drici. Djalel
Welding and NDT research center (CSC) BP 64 Cheraga, Algeria
J.drici@csc.dz
Abstract— the diagnostic of the induction machines becomes more and more important. This made necessary the monitoring function condition of these machines for improved an exploitation of the installation. The aim of this work is the proposal of a monitoring strategy based on the fuzzy logic, that informs us about the healthy and fault operating condition of short-circuit between turns of the stator windings. The principle adopted for the strategy suggested is based on monitoring of the average root mean square (RMS) value of the stator current, which will be useful as input data with the fuzzy logic block and considered to making decision on the machine state.
Keywords — Induction Machine, Monitoring, Detection, Fuzzy logic, RMS, Modeling, Simulation.
1. INTRODUCTION
he faults diagnosis of the induction machines (IM) is studied under various approaches by many research work because of its considerable interest for the continuity of the industrial processes service [1, 2].
An early detection of the faults and the diagnosis allow to minimize the downtime, the turn-around time of the process in question, to avoid the damaging consequences, and to reduce the financial losses [3-5].This is performed by measuring accessible sizes and easily measurable of the machine, to analyze them in a minimum of time and to conclude the state of the induction machine [6, 7].
In general, the electric machines can be external or internal fault [8, 9]. For the external faults, they are caused by the feeding source, the mechanical load, and environment of the machine use. The intern faults are caused in the magnetic circuits, stator and/or rotor windings, mechanical air-gap, and the cage rotor of the machine [10, 11]. Within this framework, the statistics reveal that the electrical faults on the level of the stator are the most recurrent [12, 13].
Aouabdi. Salim
Welding and NDT research center (CSC) BP 64 Cheraga, Algeria
h.aouabdi@csc.dz Berrahal. Khoukha
Welding and NDT research center (CSC) BP 64 Cheraga, Algeria
K.berrahal@csc.dz
However, through this work, we will be interested particularly in the short-circuit faults between stator turns of the induction machine (IM). As know that the principal consequence which causes this faults type is the increase in the stator currents amplitudes [14, 15].
Therefore, the approach that we propose is based on the artificial intelligence, in order to increase the efficiency and the reliability of the diagnosis in the supervision field and diagnosis of the IM [16-17]. The model of the approach as well as the global model are simulated by using software MatLab ® SIMULINK and results of simulations obtained in a healthy function and short-circuit faults are presented and interpreted.
I. MODELING OF THE IM
The development of a diagnosis procedure containing analytical models of the induction machine must cover a certain number of problems of the synthesis methods describing the behavior of the machine, by integrating precisely certain parameters for describing the performance of the machine. The models must be adequate to describe clearly the detection method [18, 19].
The proper inductances and mutual inductances, issue respectively expressed in (1) and (2) are given by using the theory of winding function:
(1) (2) μ0 : air permeability;
g: thickness of the air-gap ; l: length of stator/rotor ; r: Means radius of stator/rotor;
Nt : number of windings turns;
θr : angular position between rotor windings;
P : poles number.
Monitoring and Fault detection of the Stator short- circuit fault in induction motor based on the Fuzzy
Logic approach
T
Proceedings of Engineering & Technology (PET)
The voltage stator and rotor equations can be expressed in the form of matrix following:
_ _ _
0 0
0 0
0 0
(3)
Voltage rotor equations:
_ _ _
0 0
0 0
0 0
(4)With;
_ (5)
_
(6)
The flow stator and rotor equations can be expressed in the form of matrix following:
(7)
Electromagnetic Torque equation:
. → → . . →
→
(8)The inductances matrices are obtained to leave:
(9)
sin sin sin
sin sin sin
sin sin sin
(10)
sin sin sin
sin sin sin
sin sin sin
11
(12)
With;
The mutual inductances of the stator tow-phase winding:
(13)
The mutual inductance of the rotor tow-phase winding:
(14)
The self mutual inductance of the stator and rotor:
(15)
Where;
Lls, Llr : stator and rotor leakage inductances;
Ns , Nr : number of the stator and the rotor turns.
II. MODEL OF SHORT-CIRCUIT OF THE IM
The voltage and flows equations of the machine in the presence of the short-circuit faults are [20]:
0
(16)
rcc: resistance of the short-circuit winding
.
(17)The flows equations are written in the form:
(18)
Lscc: mutual inductance between a stator phase and the short- circuit winding;
Lrcc: mutual inductance between a rotor phase and the short- circuit winding;
In the fault, we can write various inductances of short circuit winding compared to the stator and rotor phases:
(19)
3
2 cos sin
3
2 cos sin
3
2 . cos sin
3
2 . cos sin
(20)
Proceedings of Engineering & Technology (PET)
Where, the relationship between the turn’s number in short- circuits and the number of healthy phase turns (cc) are defines by:
(21)
After the transformation of the three-phase system into two- phase (
, ) the
voltage and flow equations become:
0
(22)
. . .
(23) With ,
. cos sin
cos sin (24)
̃
(25)
, : the respectively common magnetizing flow and stator leakage flows.
The winding equation at fault brought back to the primary is written:
̃ . .
(25)The line currents are then the sum of the short-circuit currents and the currents consumed by the traditional model of Concordia. Thus, it becomes possible to express the equation of winding at fault in the reference stator:
̃ . .
(26)III. MONITORING OF THE STATOR BY FUZZY LOGIC
1. Monitoring system
In this work, we use fuzzy logic for the detection and the diagnosis of short-circuit faults in the induction machine. The diagram block of the suggested approach is shown in figure 1.
In this case, linguistic variables, fuzzy subsets and the membership functions describe amplitudes of the stator current. An interface fuzzy system comprising the rules and
the data bases is established to support the fuzzy inference.
The state of the machine is diagnosed by using a compositionally rule of fuzzy execution [21, 22].
2. Input-output variables of fuzzy system
The amplitudes of the stator currents (Ias, Ibs and Ics) and the state of stator, (CM) are respectively selected as input and output variables of the fuzzy system. All these variables are defined by using the fuzzy set theory. Figure 2, shows that CM interprets the state of the stator as a linguistic variable, which could be T (CM) = {Healthy Stator, Short-circuit, Critical Short-circuit, Open phase}.Each limit in T (CM) is characterized by a fuzzy subset. The dialog system CM {Healthy Stator (HS)}: interprets that the stator is healthy, {Short-circuit (SC)}: the stator can by present a short-circuit faults, {Critical Short-circuit (CSC)}: that the critical short- circuit fault, and {Open phase (OP)}: interprets that the stator open phase fault. The variables of input Ias, Ibs and Ics are also interpreted as linguistic variables, with, T (Q) = {Zero (Z), Small (S), Medium (M), Big (B)} as it is showing in figure 3.
The fuzzy rules of the membership functions are built by the whole data observation. There is, however, 14 rules used
Fig.1 monitoring system of IM state
Fig.2. Membership functions for output variables OP
SC CSC
HS
CM
Q
Z M L
Fig. 3 Membership functions for input variables S
Proceedings of Engineering & Technology (PET)
starting from the membership functions for the input and the output. These rules are then defined, as the following:
Rule (01): If Ias is Z Then CM is OP Rule (02): If Ibs is Z Then CM is OP Rule (03): If Ics is Z Then CM is OP Rule (04): If Ias is B Then CM is CSC Rule (05): If Ibs is B Then CM is CSC Rule (06): If Ics is B Then CM is CSC
Rule (07): If Ias is M and Ibs is M and Ics is M Then CM is HS Rule (08): If Ias is S and Ibs is S and Ics is S Then CM is HS Rule (09): If Ias is S and Ibs is S and Ics is M Then CM is SC Rule (10): If Ias is S and Ias is M and Ics is M Then CM is SC Rule (11): If Ias is M and Ibs is S et Ics is M Then CM is SC Rule (12): If Ias is S and Ibs is M et Ics is S Then CM is SC Rule (13): If Ias is M and Ibs is S et Ics is S Then CM is SC Rule (14): If Ias is M and Ibs is M et Ics is S Then CM is SC
IV. SIMULATIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS The figures 4.a present the three phases currents of a, b and c as well as part on largamente (zoom) of where the regime is permanent, this latter shows clearly that the three currents are balanced, figure. 4 b present the RMS of the three currents phases, it is noticed that their magnitudes are the same one in this case, the figure 4.c presents the output of the fuzzy value (the decision). This value is included in the interval CM = {HS [0 25]}, which corresponds to the limits of the healthy stator case. In addition, in the figure 4.d present the fuzzy inference diagram of the currents phases and the decision.
The continuation of the tests consist in analyzing the same sizes but when the machine presents a short-circuit faults with 5% (fig. 5) and 10% (fig. 6) between the turns of the phase
"a". These tests are basically the object of showing the possibility of detecting such a fault and also of monitoring on the state of its severity. Indeed, it is noticed that the stator short-circuit fault cause an imbalance of the currents of the machine. We notice the increase in the amplitudes of the currents of the stator phases, but with different rates, and this although the fault lies only in the level of the phase "a".
The figures 5.a-b and 6.a-b corresponding to tests of short-circuit (Currents phases and RMS), present increases in magnitudes proportional to the numbers (proportion) of the short-circuit stator turns. In addition, the figures 5.c and 6.c indicate values which correspond to those that indicate the presence of the fault. Indeed, in the case of 5% shorted- circuit turns the decision indicates CM = {SC [20 50]}. On the other hand, for 10% of shorted-circuit stator turns the decision indicates CM = {CSC [45 75]}.Therefore, these tests validate that the approach is reliable and exploitable.
For proved that our approach of detection and monitoring of induction machine function state gives satisfactory results even in the cases where the short-circuit fault is caused within the other phases (B and c) of the machine. We tested our model in the case of a defect 10% of turn’s shorted- circuit with the phase "b" then the same rate for the phase
"c".
-a- Stator currents
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40
Time (s)
Stator Currents (A)
Isa Isb Isc
1.45 1.5 1.55
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
0 5 10 15 20 25
Time (s)
RMS of stator currents(A)
RMS__Ias RMS__Ibs RMS__Ics
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
0 20 40 60 80 100
Time (S)
Fuzzy Values
Fig.4 Characteristics of the IM (healthy case) -d- Fuzzy inference diagram
-c- Output fuzzy Values -b- RMS of the stator currents
HS
Proceedings of Engineering & Technology (PET)
-b- RMS of the stator currents -a- Stator currents
-c- Output fuzzy Values
-d- Fuzzy inference diagram
Fig.5 Characteristics of the IM with 5% short-circuit of phase "a" (short-circuit case)
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40
Time (s)
Stator Currents (A)
Isa Isb Isc
1.45 1.5 1.55
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
0 5 10 15 20 25
Time (s)
RMS of stator currents(A)
RMS__Isa RMS__Isb RMS__Isc
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
0 20 40 60 80 100
Time (s)
Fuzzy Values
-b- RMS of the stator currents -a- Stator currents
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
-50 -25 0 25 50
Time (s)
Stator Currents (A)
Isa Isb Isc
1.45 1.5 1.55
-50 -25 0 25 50
Time (s)
Stator Currents (A)
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Time (s)
RMS of stator currents(A)
RMS__Isa RMS__Isb RMS__Isc
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
0 20 40 60 80 100
Time (s)
Fuzzy Values
-c- Output fuzzy Values
-d- Fuzzy inference diagram
Fig.5 Characteristics of the IM with 10 % short-circuit of phase "a" (critical short-circuit case)
SC
CSC
Proceedings of Engineering & Technology (PET)
For these tests, we are relieved to present only the corresponding fuzzy inference diagrams (figures 7 and 8) which show incontestably that the considered approach is valid and reliable.
V. CONCLUSION
In this paper, we presented the development of a fault model of the induction machine then the simulation of this type faults.
We initially presented in the first part the mathematical model then the simulation of healthy machine.
In the second part of this work we have assembled feasibility to detect and diagnosis the stator short-circuit fault between turns in an induction machine by supervising the magnitudes of the stator currents. In addition, this approach inform about the induction machine function condition and to predict the fault severity.
References
[1] H. Bouchikhi, V. Choqueuse, M. Benbouzid and J. F. Charpentier,
“Induction Machine Bearing Failures Detection Using Stator Current Frequency Spectral Subtraction”, IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, 10.1109/ISIE.2012.6237265, pp.1228-1233, 2012.
[2] J. Seshadrinath, B.Singh, and B. Ketan Panigrah, “Investigation of Vibration Signatures for Multiple Fault Diagnosis in Variable Frequency Drives Using Complex Wavelets”, IEEE Transaction on power electronics, vol. 29, no. 2, pp 936-945. Feb 2014.
[3] F. Babaa, A. Khezzar, M.El Kamel Oumaamar, “Experimental investitgation and comparative study of inerturn short-circuits and unbalanced voltage supply in induction machines”, Front. Energy, Vol .7 issue 3, pp 271–278. 2013.
[4] S.M. Shashidhara and P.S. Raju, “Stator Winding Fault Diagnosis of Three Phase Induction Motor by Park’s Vector Approach”, Internatonal Journal of Advance Research In Electircal Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering, Vol.2, pp. 2901-2906, Issue, 7, July. 2013.
[5] L. Frosini and E. Bassi, “Stator Current and Motor Efficiency as Indicators for Different Types of Bearing Faults in Induction Motor”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 57, No. 1, 2010.
[6] A Alwodai, F Gu and A D Ball, “A Comparison of Different Techniques for Induction Motor Rotor Fault Diagnosis”, 25th International Congress on Condition Monitoring and Diagnostic Engineering, IOP Publishing, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 364, 012066, 2012.
[7] H. Eristi, “Fault diagnosis system for series compensated transmission line based on wavelet transform and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system”, Measurement, vol 46,pp 393–401. 2013.
[8] K. Moin Siddiqui, K. Sahay, V.K.Giri “Health Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis in Induction Motor”, International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering Vol.
3, January 2014.
[9] K. Moin Siddiqui and V.K.Giri. “Broken Rotor Bar Fault Detection in Induction Motors using Wavelet Transform”, Int. Conf Proc, IEEE, Computing, Electronics and Electrical Technologies [ICCEET], pp. 1-6, Chennai, India, March, 2012.
[10] M. Akar, Ilyas .C. Ankay, “Broken rotor bar fault detection in inverter- fed squirrel cage induction motors using stator current analysis and fuzzy logic”, Turk J Elec Eng & Comp Sci, Vol. 20, No.1, 2012.
[11] A.Verma, S. Sarangi, M.H. Kolekar “Stator winding fault prediction of induction motors using multiscale entropy and grey fuzzy optimization methods” Computers & Electrical Engineering .June 2014.
[12] Somaya A. M. Shehata, Hamdy S. El-Goharey, Mostafa I. Marei, Ahmed K. Ibrahim “Detection of Induction Motors Rotor/Stator Faults Using Electrical Signatures Analysis,” International Conference on Renewable Energies and Power Quality (ICREPQ’13)Bilbao (Spain), 20th to 22th March, 2013.
[13] D. K. Chaturvedi, Akash Gautam, Mayank Pratap Singh, Md. Sharif Iqbal“ On Line Fault Identification of Induction Motor using Fuzzy System”, TECHNIA – International Journal of Computing Science and Communication Technologies, VOL.6 N. 2 ISSN 0974-3375). 01/2014.
[14] A. M. da Silva, Richard J. Povinelli, ,and Nabeel A. O. Demerdash, Life Fellow “Rotor Bar Fault Monitoring Method Based on Analysis of Air- Gap Torques of Induction Motors ” IEEE Trans on industrial informatics, vol. 9, no. 4 , pp 2274-2283. November 2013.
[15] R. N. Dash, B. Subudhi and S. Das "Induction Motor Stator Inter-Turn Fault Detection Using Wavelet Transform Technique" 2010, 5th International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems ICIIS 2010 Jul 29-Aug 01, pp 436-441.
[16] S. M.Ahmed , Haitham Abu-Rub, Shady S. Refaat, Atif Iqbal,
“Diagnosis of Stator Turn-to-Turn Fault and Stator Voltage Unbalance Fault Using ANFIS”, International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) Vol.3, No.1, , pp. 129~135 ISSN: 2088-8708, February 2012.
[17] Y. D. Sanjeev, K. Srivastava, Chris S. Edrington, David A. Cartes
“Application of artificial intelligence to stator winding fault diagnosis in Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines” Electric Power Systems Research 2013, vol 103,pp 201–213.
[18] A. K. Ibrahim, M.I. Marei, H.S. El- Goharey, S.A.M. Shehata,
“Modeling of Induction Motor Based on Winding Function Theory to Study Motor under Stator/Rotor Internal Faults,” 14th Int. Middle East Power Systems Conference, (MEPCON’10), Cairo, Egypt, December 19-21, 2010.
[19] V. Prakash Pandey and P. K. Choudhary, “Induction Motor Condition Monitoring Using Fuzzy Logic”, Advance in Electronic and Electric Engineering. ISSN 2231-1297, Volume 3, N° 6 pp. 755-7646 2013.
[20] Y. Soufi, T. Bahi, H. Merabet and S. Lekhchine, “Short Circuit between Turns in Stator Winding of Induction Machine Fault Detection and Diagnosis,”Applied Mechanics and Materials; Vols. 416-417 (2013) p 565-571. 2013.
[21] K. Mohanraj, S. Makkapati, S. Paramasivam , “ Unbalanced and Double Line to Ground Fault Detection of Three Phase VSI Fed Induction Motor Drive using Fuzzy Logic Approach”, International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 888) Vol 47– No.15, 2012.
[22] K. Bhardwaj, A. Agarawal , “ Fault Diagnosis of Three Phase Induction Motor using Fuzzy Logic Controller and Sequence Analyzer”, MIT International Journal of Electrical and Instrumentation Engineering, Vol.
2, No. 2, pp. (112-118) Aug. 2012.
Fig.7 Fuzzy inference diagram of the IM with 10%
short-circuit of phase "b"
Fig.8 Fuzzy inference diagram of the IM with 10%
short-circuit of phase "c"