HAL Id: jpa-00212363
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00212363
Submitted on 1 Jan 1990
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of
sci-entific research documents, whether they are
pub-lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.
The topologically-disordered square lattice
Jean-Marc Greneche, J.M.D. Coey
To cite this version:
The
topologically-disordered
square
lattice
J. M. Greneche
(1, *)
and J. M. D.Coey
(2)
(1) Kernforschungszentrum
Karlsruhe, I.N.F.P., Postfach 3640, D-7501 Karlsruhe, F.R.G.(2)
Department
of Pure andApplied Physics, Trinity College,
Dublin 2, Ireland(Reçu
le 19 mai 1989,accepté
sousforme définitive
le 27septembre 1989)
Résumé. 2014
Nous
développons
la méthode des défautstopologiques
à un réseau carré bidimensionnel: laréorganisation topologique
obtenue par cassure de liaisonspuis
création de nouvelles liaisons entre cations, conduit à unsystème
désordonné typeAB2 après
insertion des anions. Deux modèles ont été obtenus àpartir
de défautstopologiques
élémentaires de naturedifférente en tenant compte des contraintes
géométriques imposées
au cours de leurempilement.
Les valeurs de la densité et del’énergie élastique
calculéesaprès
relaxation sontplus
faibles pourle modèle
présentant
un nombreplus important
decycles impairs :
par ailleurs, despics
de tracescristallines sont observables sur la fonction d’interférence, alors que le second modèle,
possédant
unemajorité
decycles pairs,
esttypiquement
amorphe.
Nousprésentons
laconfiguration
magnétique
de l’état fondamental calculée en supposant que toutes les interactions sontantiferromagnétiques
et nedépendent uniquement
del’angle
desuperéchange
ABA. Abstract. 2014 Thetopological
defect method,consisting
ofmodifying
thetopology
of acrystalline
supercell by breaking
andreforming
bonds between cations, isapplied
to a two-dimensional square lattice to simulate four-coordinatedAB2
systems after introduction of anions. Two distinctelementary
defects are used to generate twohighly-disordered
networks withgeometric
constraintsimposed
on thetopological
defects. Afterrelaxation,
the lowerdensity
and lower elastic energy are found for the network with amajority
of odd-memberedrings
which retainsvestiges
ofcrystalline peaks
in thescattering
functionS(q) ;
the other network, with amajority
of even-memberedrings
isentirely non-crystalline. Finally,
theA-spin configuration
in themagnetic
ground
state, is calculatedassuming antiferromagnetic
interactions thatdepend only
on the ABAsuperexchange angle.
Classification
Physics
Abstracts61.40D - 75.25 - 75.50K
Introduction.
The
physics
of disorderedsystems
has beenreceiving growing
attentionduring
thepast
twodecades. Considerable effort has been devoted to
developing
structuralmodels,
characterizing
their
topological
disorder andevaluating
theirphysical properties.
Someconcepts
have beenadapted
fromcrystallography
to describe the structure ofamorphous
materials(amorphog-raphy
[1]).
The idea of frustration[2],
used toexplain
themagnetic
behaviour of disordered(*)
Alexander von Humboldt fellow from Laboratoire dePhysique
des Matériaux, Université duMaine, 72017 Le Mans Cedex, France
(Permanent address).
systems
withantiferromagnetic
interactions,
wasalready
present
in certaincrystalline
lattices. Suchconcepts
wereusually
introduced at first for two-dimensional(2-D)
systems
and then extended to three-dimensions(3-D).
Relatively
little attention has beenpaid
to 2-D disorderedsystems.
Besidesoffering
an excellentapproach
to anunderstanding
of theproperties
of 3-D disorderedsystems,
they
provide
a means ofinterpreting
the mechanisms ofgrain growth
inpolycrystalline
or sinteredmaterials
(see
Weaire et al.[3],
physisorption
andchemisorption
(for
areview,
see[4]).
To ourknowledge,
thesimplified
2-DBernal liquid
was the first 2-D disordered networkdiscussed in the literature
[5] :
it was advanced to model the order-disorder transition and consisted of aclose-packed assembly
ofregular
orquasi-regular polygons
(triangles
andsquares).
An extension of thismodel,
called « thetriangular
square lattice » wasrecently
discussed inthermodynamic
terms[6] ;
then a frustratedtopology
wasapplied
to theproblem
ofamorphous antiferromagnetism assuming Ising
[7]
andHeisenberg
[8]
magnetic
moments.In an other
approach,
a 2-D randomnetwork,
adapted
to vitreoussilica,
was handbuiltby
generating
arrays oftriangles equivalent
to extended Zachariasen schematics[9].
Topologi-cally
disorderedhexagonal
networks were obtainedby systematically introducing topological
defects into a 2-D lattice whilerespecting boundary
conditions[10] :
the method consists ofbreaking
andreconnecting
bonds,
the coordinationbeing kept
constant. The author concludes in this paper that thering
statistics converge to fixed valuesindependently
of the network size.In their
approach,
Weaire and Kermode focused their attention on the evolution of 2-D soap froths[3].
Two processes were introduced to simulate thetopological
rearrangement
of the cells contained in the network so as toreproduce
the time evolution of a soap film : one consists ofcreating
a bond and the other ofdestroying
a smallcell,
the coordination stillbeing
kept equal
to 3. Their modelreproduces
well the features observed in soap frothitself,
as well asgrain growth
orplastic
deformation in metals[11].
These studies show the interest in
understanding
theamorphography
of 2-D disorderedsystems.
They
can also be considered as a firstapproach
tostudying
real 3-Damorphous
materials.Recently,
Wooten and Weaire[12]
havedeveloped
thetopological
defect method forgenerating amorphous
tetrahedral structures for a-Si or a-Ge. Theprocedure
involves successive introduction of defects into alarge crystalline supercell,
each defectresulting
in a localrearrangement
of thetopology,
the coordinationremaining
unaltered.Our aim is to
develop
the method for octahedral structures. We havepreviously analysed
two handbuilt structural models
[13]
and acomputed
one[14] representing
theAB3
random networkcomposed
ofcomer-sharing AB6
octahedra. Thealgorithm
forgenerating
thecomputer
model is based on threephysical
criteria :(i)
6-fold A and 2-fold Bcoordination,
(ii)
steric encumbrance of the atoms A and B and(iii)
geometrically
frustratedtopology
with thepresence
of both odd- and even-membered Arings.
The latter is indicatedby
themagnetic
behaviour ofamorphous
FeF3,
where theantiferromagnetic
Fe-F-Fesuperexchange
interac-tions are frustrated[15].
In this paper, we
apply
thetopological
defect method to a 2-D squarelattice,
thereby
generating
aplanar
non-crystalline
network. The structure,topology
andproperties
are thendiscussed. Extension to 3-D will be
reported
elsewhere[16].
The
topological
defect method.We
begin
with acrystalline
squaresuperlattice containing
the Apositions
which was taken toneighbour
A cations.Only
four-memberedrings
arepresent
in such a network. Thetopological
defect method consists inmodifying
thetopology
of thestarting
configuration by
breaking
some cation-cation bonds and thenreforming
new cation-cation bonds whichrespect
the coordination. The local
rearrangement
involved after introduction of twotypes
of defect are illustrated infigure
1. The firsttopological
defect(Fig. la)
consists inrotating
the intemal squarering
definedby
cationsA, B,
C and D as follows : theBE,
CF,
DG and AH bonds are broken and then theAE, BF,
CG and DH bonds are connected. The second one(Fig. lb)
consists inbreaking
BC and AD bonds and thenreconnecting
AC and BD bonds. Defect(1)
may be considered as a dislocationquadrupole
and defect(2)
as a dislocationdipole.
The finalarrangement
in both cases exhibits three and five-memberedrings :
a six-memberedring
can result from thejudicious juxtaposition
of twotopological
defects.Furthermore,.
the
topological
environment createdby
onetype
of defect can be obtainedby
juxtaposing
several of the other ones, and vice versa.Fig.
1. - Local rearrangement inducedby
the two types oftopological
defects discussed in the text.The locations of the
topological
defects are chosenrandomly by
thecomputer
program. Some of thetopological
defects may be moved tooptimize
thehomogeneity
of the disorder. Nodangling
bonds or double bonds between two cation nearestneighbours
are allowed.Some rules
relying
ongeometrical
considerations to exclude unrealistic situations were established asexplained
in next section.When a
topological
defect isgenerated
near the outeredge
of the squaresuperlattice,
theneighbourhood
is obtainedby
consideration ofperiodic boundary
conditions.The final A-site
topology
is achieved when no more defects thatsatisfy
the rules can be introduced. At thisstage,
the anions are insertedby placing
the B-atomsmid-way
betweentwo cation nearest
neighbours.
Then,
aprocedure
of structural relaxationusing
an harmonicpotential
(analogous
to that used in[14])
is extended to the wholemodel,
inconjonction
withperiodic boundary
conditions. Thetopology
isunchanged by
such a relaxationprocedure.
Finally,
differentphysical
parameters
are deduced from the relaxed structural network :density,
radial distributionfunctions,
interferencefunctions,
distortionparameters,
ring
statistics,
angular
distributionfunctions,
magnetization
andspin
correlation function(as-suming
an interaction scheme andallocating
amagnetic
moments to A ionsonly).
The
geometric problem.
structure is not
completely
random ;
a certainregularity
isimposed by
the local atomicarrangement :
consequently,
somegeometric
constraints due to thisshort-range
order have tobe taken into account when
superimposing
thetopological
defects. Theproblem,
in otherwords,
is how to fill aplane
with somewhat distortedpolygons,
the 4 : 2 coordinationbeing
everywhere
maintained.In the
present
study,
thefollowing quantitative
limits wereestablished,
guided by
the structural data observed on the threepolymorphic crystalline phases
ofFeF3
[17]
and those on theamorphous
forms[18].
First,
thetype
ofpolygon
is limited totriangle,
square,pentagon
or
hexagon.
Inaddition,
thepolygons
have to be convex andweakly
distorted : a concave or ahighly-distorted polygon
would beequivalent
to unrealisticlarge-angle
distortions in the localstructure. Then we
analysed
the differentpossibilities
offilling
aplane
withpolygons
so as toestablish the rules to be
applied
in order to avoid unrealistic stituations whensuperimposing
thetopological
defects : 35 cases are found andonly
the more favorable ones are listed in table I. The lower and upper limits on the sum of the four idealangles
AAA around one Aatom were estimated as follows : first
by taking
the ratio of A and B ionicradii,
one obtain a lower limit for theangle
ABA(135°)
isappropriate
forFe 31
andF- ), and
thenby
considering
the lower and upper values of the AB distanceexperimentally
observed(1.95 (3)
Â)
found fora-FeF3
[18].
From thesedata,
two extreme values were definedequal
to 330° and 385°between which the distortions can be consistent with the structural observed data on the
amorphous
ferric fluorides. The sum of the four real AAAangles
is,
of course, 360°.Table I. Geometric situations encountered in a two-dimensional case.
The two 2-D models.
The
starting supercell
was a square latticecontaining
50 x 50 Asites,
which should belarge
enough
to berepresentative
of theamorphous
state. The distances between two first-nearestneighbours
was taken as a. Then the method wasapplied
togenerate
twomodels,
1 and2,
using only
the defects a and brespectively
presented
infigure
1. The finaltopology
of the twomodels is illustrated in
figures
2 and 3 : 214a-type
and 269b-type
defects weresuccessfully
introduced. One can first remark that no « unrealistic » situation is observable in eithermodel,
inagreement
with the limitsproposed
in table I.In
figures
4 and5,
the A-sitetopology
of the two models ispresented
aftercarrying
out the relaxationprocedure
on wholesystem
(2
500 A cations and 5 000 Banions)
taking
intoaccount the
periodic boundary
conditions. The distance AB wasinitially
takenequal
toa/2 (dAB
=1.95 Â).
Structural
analysis
of the 2 models.The
ring
statisticspresented
in table II show that the two models aretopologically
rather different. No six-memberedrings
were allowed in the second network. The first model contains 64 % of odd-memberedrings
while the second one contains 44 %. Inaddition,
the elastic energy of the second model is found to be four timeshigher
than that of the first one,after
applying
the structural relaxationprocedure
in both cases. At thisstage,
we conclude that the model with six-memberedrings
is more realistic.Table II.
- Ring
statisticsfor
the two-dimensional modelscompared
to ano-defect
squared
lattice.
The structural characteristics of the two relaxed models are
reported
in table III. Here it would appear that the two models are verysimilar,
although
theAA,
AB and BBpeaks
are broader for the second model. Note also that thedensity
calculated for the model 1 is lower than that of thecrystalline phase,
while thedensity
of the model 2 ishigher ;
suchchanges
aredirectly
related to the nature of thetopological
defects.In other
respects,
by looking
at the radial distribution functions(RDF) (see
forexample
theAA
partial
RDF and the total RDFpresented
inFigs.
6 and 7respectively),
one can conclude that the two models arestructurally
very different : the first structure model looks like that of a distortedcrystalline
lattice while the second one exhibits thetypical signs
of anamorphous
structure.
Fig.
2. -Representative
view of the square model 1 beforeapplying
the structural relaxationprocedure.
Fig.
3. -Fig.
4. -Representative
view of the square model 1 afterapplying
the structural relaxationprocedure.
Fig.
5. -Table III. - Structural characteristics
of
the two-dimensional modelscompared
to theno-defect
square lattice(a
=3.90 Â ).
(*)
« and {3 are the distortion parameters of theAB2
unitsare the
equilibrium
distance between A and B and two first-nearest B atomsrespectively.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig.
6. - AA radial distribution functions of a no-defect square lattice(a),
of model 1(b)
and of model2 (c).
Fig.
7. - Total radial distribution functions of a no-defect square lattice(a),
of model 1(b)
and of model2 (c).
Fig.
8. - Interference functions of ano-defect square lattice
(a),
of model 1(b)
and of model 2(c).
Magnetic
behaviour.The calculation of the
magnetic
structure consists ofdetermining
themagnetic
momentdirections after
minimizing
the energy for classicalspins.
The initial state with directions of the A sitemagnetic
moments oriented in theplane
wasrandomly
generated by
thecomputer
for the two models. An XY
spin
interaction was considered between the 4 nearestneighbours
Fig.
9. -Fig.
10. -where
Jij
represents theintegral exchange coupling
(negative
in the case ofantiferromagnetic
interactions)
which is related to thesuperexchange angle
ABA but assumedindependent
of the distance between first-nearestneighbours
AA. Themagnetic
structure is then relaxedby
minimizing
themagnetic
energyaccording
agradient
method which waspreviously developed
forcrystalline
fluorides[19] :
eachspin
is examinedindividually
and rotatedaccording
to thetorque
due to itsmagnetic
neighbours
at eachiteration ;
in addition theperiodic boundary
conditions were also taken into account.The final
magnetic configurations
arepresented
infigures
9 and 10respectively
and themagnetic
characteristics arereported
in table IV. The frustrationdegree
can be estimated from themagnetic
energy perspin
which appears to be very similar in both casesalthough
theirtopologies
are rather different(see
thepercentage
of odd-memberedrings
in Tab.IV).
Inaddition,
thespin
correlation functions were estimated for both models andcompared
tothat of a no-defect
antiferromagnetic
squarelattice,
as shown infigure
11.Table IV.
- Magnetic
characteristicso f
the two-dimensional modelscompared
to theno-defect
squared
lattice.Fig.
11. -The
shape
of thespin
correlation function calculated for the first model confirms that it looks like a distortedcrystalline
lattice. In both cases, the difference between the A-A radial distribution function(presented
inFig.
6)
and thespin
correlation function shows that themagnetic
moments areisotropically
distributed in theplane
and indicates anantiferromagnetic
coupling
between first-nearestmagnetic
moments.Conclusions.
The
application
of thetopological
defect method to the 2-D square lattice shows that thesuperimposition
oftopological
defects may leadpacking
difficulties withphysically
reasonable atomic sizes. The two 2-D models obtainedby generating
twotypes
oftopological
defectsubject
toplausible geometric
constraints arestructurally
andtopologically
ratherdifferent ;
one retains traces of
crystalline
order,
while the other does not butthey
exhibit similarmagnetic
behaviour : themagnetic
moments areisotropically
distributed in theplane.
Acknowledgments.
The authors thank Prof. D. Weaire for
stimulating
discussionsduring
thepresent
study.
One of us(J.
M.G.)
wishes to thank Dr G.Czjzek
and Prof. H. Rietschel for theirhospitality
in theKernforschungszentrum
of Karlsruhe and for thefacility
ofcomputing.
References
[1]
WRIGHT A. C., in Coherence andEnergy
transfer in Glasses, Ed. P. A.Fleury
and B.Golding,
p. 1.
WRIGHT A. C., CORNELL G. A. N. and ALLEN J. W., J. Non
Cryst.
Solids 42(1980)
69.[2]
TOULOUSE G., Commun.Phys.
2(1977)
115.VANNIMENUS J. and TOULOUSE G., J.
Phys.
C: Solid StatePhys.
10(1977)
L537.[3]
WEAIRE D. and KERMODE J. P., Philos.Mag. B
47(1983)
L29 ; Philos.Mag. B
48(1983)
245.[4]
WEAIRE D. and RIVIER N.,Contemp. Physics
25(1984)
54 ;WEAIRE D.,
Topological
Disorder in Condensed Matter, Ed. F. Yonezawa and T.Ninomiya
(Berlin : Springer)
1983, p. 51.[5]
COLLINS R., Proc.Phys.
Soc. 83(1964)
553.[6]
KAWAMURA H., J.Magn. Magn.
Mater. 31-34(1983)
1487 ;Prog.
Theor.Phys.
70(1983)
352 ;Topological
Disorder in Condensed Matter, Ed. F. Yonezawa and T.Ninomiya (Berlin :
Springer)
1983, p. 181.[7]
KAWAMURA H.,Prog.
Theor.Phys.
70(1983)
697.[8]
KAWAMURA H.,Prog.
Theor.Phys.
73(1983)
311.[9]
SHACKELFORD J. F. and BROWN B. D., J. NonCryst.
Solids 44(1981)
379 ;SHACKELFORD J. F., J. Non
Cryst.
Solids 49(1982)
19.[10]
HE H., J. NonCryst.
Solids 94(1987)
22.[11]
WEAIRE D. and KERMODE J. P., Philos.Mag. B
50(1984)
379.[12]
WOOTEN F. and WEAIRE D., Solid StatePhys.
40(1987)
1 and references therein.[13]
COEY J. M. D. and MURPHY P. J. K., J. NonCryst.
Solids 50(1982)
125 ;GRENECHE J. M., TEILLET J. and COEY J. M. D., J. Non