• Aucun résultat trouvé

ANOMALOUS BEHAVIOR OF THE RF-SQUID IN THE NON-HYSTERETIC CASE : DC-FLUX DEPENDENCE OF THE OUTPUT SIGNAL WITH PERIOD ø0/2

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "ANOMALOUS BEHAVIOR OF THE RF-SQUID IN THE NON-HYSTERETIC CASE : DC-FLUX DEPENDENCE OF THE OUTPUT SIGNAL WITH PERIOD ø0/2"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: jpa-00218021

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00218021

Submitted on 1 Jan 1978

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of

sci-entific research documents, whether they are

pub-lished or not. The documents may come from

teaching and research institutions in France or

abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est

destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents

scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,

émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de

recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires

publics ou privés.

ANOMALOUS BEHAVIOR OF THE RF-SQUID IN

THE NON-HYSTERETIC CASE : DC-FLUX

DEPENDENCE OF THE OUTPUT SIGNAL WITH

PERIOD ø0/2

S. Erné, H. Luther

To cite this version:

(2)

ANOMALOUS BEHAVIOR OF THE RF-SQUID IN THE NON-HYSTERETIC CASE :

DC-FLUX DEPENDENCE OF THE OUTPUT SIGNAL WITH PERIOD <j>

0

/2

Abstract.- It is shown that the dependence of the RF-SQUIDoutput signal is not always periodical in 4> but, for special parameter configurations the period is <f 12. Experimental and theoretical results are in agreement. From the general theory for the non-hysteretic SQUID conditions have been develo-ped for this anomalous behaviour.

Usually it is assumed that the amplitude of the tank circuit voltage U of an RF-biased SQUID is a periodical function of the applied dc-magnetic flux <|), with a period of the flux quantum <J> . This is the reason for several authors /1-4/ to define a modulation depth U„ as the difference of the values Um for <t>, = 0 and (j>, = <J> /2. As the dependence of

T dc dc o r

U on the bias-frequency u>/2ir strongly is influen-ced by the SQUID-parameters some attempts /1-3/ have been done to determine the SQUID-parameters by

ana-lysing measurements of the off-tune-characteristic UM(OJ) . However, a detailed numerical treatment of the theory for the RF-SQUID given in /3/ shows that the assumption mentioned above for the dependence of U on <f> is not always satisfied. We here report some theoretical and first experimental results showing a periodical dependence of the output signal on the dc-flux with period <!> /2.

Quantitative expressions for the output si-gnal U can be attained from the theory /3/ only by numerical calculations. In figure 1 we present such numerical results in comparison with experimental ones, measured for a toroidal SQUID with a Nb-NbTi point contact driven at about 300 MHz and 4.2 K. The values of the Q-factor and the coupling coefficient k were Q = 100 and k = 0.2 the resonant frequency of "the tank circuit «T/2'IT = 332.6 MHz. The amplitu-de of the RF-bias-current I corresponds to that value which leads to a maximum dc-flux sensitivity at 6 = 2 Q(w - w )/w = 1. Calculated and measured values of U_ are normalized to the amplitude of the signal voltage at 5 = 1. Further SQUID parameters (as they are defined in /3/) 2Trg, OOT and a have

been fitted. Experiments and theory exhibit the ap-pearence of a dc-flux dependence with period <|> /2.

We now want to analyse these results on the basis of a simplified model to obtain analytical expressions for the Fourier coefficients of the output-voltage VT(<t>. ) • Under the conditions 2irg « 1, MI /<(> « 1, u/w « 1 the equations

cal-T O S

Fig. 1 : <(>, -dependence of the tank voltage amplitu-de fl_, 000 = measured, = calculated for 2ng A 0.7, a = - 0.9, U T = 0.1

q

JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE

Colloque

C6,

supplément au n°

8,

Tome

39,

août

1978,

page

C6-1208

S.N. Erné and H. Luther

Physikaliseh-Teehnisahe Bundesanstalt - Institut Berlin - Abbestr. 2-12, D-1000 Berlin 10, R.F.A.

Résumé.- Il est démontré que la dépendance du signal de sortie du SQUID-RF n'est pas toujours pério-dique en 4> , mais que pour certaines configurations des paramètres, la période est <f>„/2. Les résul-tats expérimentaux confirment ce comportement. Les conditions de ce comportement anormal ont été ex-primées à partir de la théorie générale du SQUID-non-hystérétique.

(3)

led the characteristic ones in /3/ are linearized :

ST

k2

5;

wr IRF sin 6 = I { -

- -

q T

Q

r S k " ;

TRF

cos 6 = IT (1

-

S2

T

+

-

r S 2aB cos (- 2r 0'

'dc)l

I

The amplitude of the output voltage can be approximated as follows A 'dc cos (2a -) ' 0

-

-

2Yo

-

Since y and y are a linear respectively a qua- dratic function of 2 ~ 6 Q k2, this effect becomes im- portant for large values of B, high Q and strong coupling between SQUID and resonant tank circuit.

From this anomalous behaviour important con- sequences arise if one intends to usetheSQUID con- figuration for junction diagnostic purpose. In this case the comparison between experiments and theory on the basis of the old "modulation depth" defini- tion described above could lead to severe difficul- ties. We therefore propose the introduction of a new definition of modulation depth Urn twice the Fourier coefficient of U (@ ) corresponding to the period

T dc

Qo. This definition is suitable over the whole range of each parameter.

References

/I/ Hansma, P.K., Phys. Rev. B

2

(1975) 1707

where we get for yo, y l and

Y,

using equation (I) 121 Nisenoff, M. and Wolf, S., Phys. Rev. B

12

(1975)

and (2) : 1712

/3/ Erne, S.N., Hahlbohm, H.-D. and Liibbig, H., J.

'

[l

+

(9

K2

ST

@-cq)'

Q

K'

ST

7 Appl. Phys.

47

(1976) 5440

Yo =

-

+ 2

Q~

I + w2

-c2

I + u2 r2 /4/ Soerensen, O.H., SQUID, Superconducting Quantum

9 P Interference Devices and their Applications, ( 1 - 6 w r ) + 6 g + y 2 9 ( 4 ) De Gruyter Berlin (1977) 365

Some essential features concerning the func- tion follow from equation 13)

-

the function ($ ) is a superposition of two T dc

terms with period $ and (Po/2

0

-

the amplitude of the $I -component vanishes at a

0

bias frequency given by

(7) in agreement with definitions (4) and (5), (yo is a quadratic, y l is a linear function of

6).

-

the amplitude of the $~~/2-component never vanishes since it is independent of 6, so that for 6 given by equation (7)

ST

('dc) shows a period @ 12.

Références

Documents relatifs

We tested for two additional contrasts an- alyzed by Smolka et al.: the difference in priming strength between Transparent and Opaque Deriva- tion (not significant in either

Introduced by Gelfand, Graev and Shapiro (1967) to study the Radon transform on k-dimensional planes in C n the &#34;kappa operator&#34; has been developed in several papers by

In the first part, by combining Bochner’s formula and a smooth maximum principle argument, Kr¨ oger in [15] obtained a comparison theorem for the gradient of the eigenfunctions,

Suppose R is a right noetherian, left P-injective, and left min-CS ring such that every nonzero complement left ideal is not small (or not singular).. Then R

[3] O.Osagiede Beyond GDPR Compliance – How IT Audit Can Move from Watchdog to Strategic Partner, isaca.org [4] Regulation (EU) 2016/679 on the protection of natural persons

However, in contrast to the case of independent r.v.’s where it is found that the optimal rate is of order N − 2+2δ δ for the strong invariance principle and N − 3+2δ δ for the

the one developed in [2, 3, 1] uses R -filtrations to interpret the arithmetic volume function as the integral of certain level function on the geometric Okounkov body of the

[r]