• Aucun résultat trouvé

(b) 6 4 3 2 is not invertible, since the reduced row echelon form of (A | I) is so the matrix on the left is not the identity

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "(b) 6 4 3 2 is not invertible, since the reduced row echelon form of (A | I) is so the matrix on the left is not the identity"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

MA 1111: Linear Algebra I

Selected answers/solutions to the assignment due October 22, 2015 1.(a)A+Band BAare not defined, AB=

8 5

; (b)A+Band BAare not defined, AB=

7 2

;

(c) A+B is not defined, BA=

9 1 9 1 0 2 15 2 12

, AB=

7 26 5 14

;

(d) A+B=

4 8 2 3

, BA=

8 16 3 6

, AB=

8 12 4 6

.

2.The easiest thing to do is to apply the algorithm from the lecture: take the matrix (A|In)and bring it to the reduced row echelon form; the result is(In|A−1)if the matrix is invertible, and has (R|B) with R6=In otherwise.

(a)

2 3 1 1

is invertible, the inverse is

−1 3 1 −2

; (b)

6 4 3 2

is not invertible, since the reduced row echelon form of (A | I) is 1 2/3 0 1/2

0 0 1 −2

so the matrix on the left is not the identity;

(c)

1 1 3 1 2 0

is not invertible, since in class we proved that only square matrices are invertible;

(d)

1 1 1 1 2 4 1 3 9

is invertible; the inverse is

3 −3 1

−5/2 4 −3/2 1/2 −1 1/2

.

3. (a) Suppose thatA is a k×l-matrix, and Bis an m×n-matrix. In order forAB to be defined, we must have l=m. In order for BAto be defined, we must have n=k.

Consequently, the size of matrix ABis k×n=n×n, and the size of the matrix BAis m×l=m×m, which is exactly what we want to prove.

(b) We have

tr(UV) = (UV)11+ (UV)22+. . .+ (UV)nn= (U11V11+U12V21+. . .+U1nVn1)+

(U21V12+U22V22+. . .+U2nVn2) +. . .+ (Un1V1n+Un2V2n+. . .+UnnVnn),

and

tr(VU) = (VU)11+ (VU)22+. . .+ (VU)nn= (V11U11+V12U21+. . .+V1nUn1)+

(V21U12+V22U22+. . .+V2nUn2) +. . .+ (Vn1U1n+Vn2U2n+. . .+VnnUnn),

so both traces are actually equal to the sum of all productsUijVji, whereiandjrange from 1 to n. For the example U =

0 1 0 0

, V =

0 0 1 0

from class, we have UV =

1 0 0 0

and VU = 0 0

0 1

, so even though these matrices are not equal, their traces are equal.

(2)

4. (a) We have A2 =

a2+bc b(a+d) c(a+d) d2+bc

. (b) Since A2 = I2, from the previous formula we have b(a +d) = c(a+d) = 0. If a+d = 0, we have tr(A) = 0, and everything is proved. Otherwise, if a+d 6=0, we have b =c =0, so a2 = 1= d2, and either a = d = 1 or a =d = −1 or a = 1, d = −1 or a = −1, d = 1. In the first case A=I, in the second caseA= −I, in the remaining two cases tr(A) =a+d=0 (which is contradiction since in this case we assumed a+d 6=0). (c) For example, the matrix 1 0

0 −1

works.

5. For example, A=

1 0 0 0 1 0

and B=

 1 0 0 1 0 0

 would work.

Références

Documents relatifs

Selected answers/solutions to the assignment for October 5,

Most of it is indeed caused by the sharp discussions on the relationship between the first-order predicate logic-based Web Ontology Language OWL and logic programming-based

In Theorem 7 we suppose that (EJ is a sequence of infinite- dimensional spaces such that there is an absolutely convex weakly compact separable subset of E^ which is total in E^, n =

Suppose R is a right noetherian, left P-injective, and left min-CS ring such that every nonzero complement left ideal is not small (or not singular).. Then R

the systematic role of consonant clusters in primary stress placement in Modern Latin words and borrowings (Fournier 2010a,b).. Small effect

Definition: The angle bisector is the line that divides the angle into two angles with equal measures. Each point of an angle bisector is equidistant from the sides of

We study the complexity of reducing (proof-nets representing) λ -terms typed in the elementary or light linear logic and relate it to the cost of naive reduction.. In particular,

So, the second step to ensure that our work reaches the right audience is drawing attention to our work, creating a community, and engaging the public.. As written by