• Aucun résultat trouvé

TR/36 DECEMBER 1973.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "TR/36 DECEMBER 1973."

Copied!
38
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

TR/36 DECEMBER 1973.

CONTINUED FRACTIONS WHICH MATCH POWER SERIES EXPANSIONS AT TWO POINTS

J.H.McCABE and J.A.MURPHY.by

(2)

W9260671

(3)

at Two Points.

by

J.H.McCabe and J.A.Murphy

Summary Theoretical results are derived for constructing continued fractions which correspond, in some prescribed way, to given power series expansions at two points. In those cases where the two power series are expansions of the same function, new approximations to the function are obtained. Error estimates for such rational function approximations are developed in certain cases. Some examples are given.

(4)
(5)

1. Preliminary discussion and notation

Continued fractions which correspond to a single, given power series at a point have been much studied, [See for example Wall (1948),

Perron (1950)]. In this paper we consider continued fractions which match power series expansions at two points.

Since for a rational function of the complex variable z, the power series expansions about the points z = 0 and z = ∞ are both available immediately by division, we consider analytic functions f(z) which possess power series expansions at these two points. Analogous results for

expansions about two finite points can then be derived by applying a bilinear transformation to the variable z. (See example 3).

Accordingly we first consider the case where for |z│ small

f(z) = a

0

+ a

1z

+ a

2

z

2

+ .... (1.1)

and where for |z| large

⎪⎭

⎪ ⎬

⎪⎩

⎪ ⎨

⎧ + + +

=

...

z a z a z

f(z) a

1 22 33

(1.2)

We assume initially, that a

0,

a

-1

≠ 0 and deal with this restriction at a later stage. The a's may be complex but for most applications we take them to be real. The reason for the notation in (1.2) will become clear subsequently.

We further assume that f(z) is single valued and that on the

positive real axis of z, f(z) has no singularities save possibly z = 0

and z =∞. The equals signs in ( 1 . 1 ) and (1.2) are not strictly

necessary in what follows, and these expansions may be regarded as

asymptotic in character holding for some range of arg z which

includes arg z=0.

(6)

2.

We approximate to f(z) by rational function approximations of the form

(z) z f

ß ...

z ß 1

z ...

z α α

j m i,

m m, m,1

1 m 1 m m, m,1

o

m,

+ + +

α + +

+

(1.3)

for m = 1,2,3, ..., the coefficients α,/ß being constants

independent of z. These 2m coefficients may be chosen such that when the rational function in (1.3) is expanded for |z| large, there is agreement with a certain number of terms in (1,1) and (1.2), totalling 2m in all. Consequently we denote the approximation (1.3) by f

i,j

(z) with i + j = 2m, where i, j are respectively, the number of terms of (1.1) and (1.2) which have been fitted. Thus

f

i , j

( z ) - f ( z ) = 0 ( z

1

, z

- ( j + 1 )

)

(1.4)

where the symbol on the R.H.S. means that the L.H.S. is 0(z

i

)

for |z| small and is 0(

Z-(J+1)

) for |z| large.

we denote a continued fraction by

...

q ... p q

p q p

m m 2

2 1

1 + + + +

(1.5)

with mth convergent Pm/Qm, where Pm, Qmboth satisfy the 3-term recurrence relation

u

m+1

= q

m+1

u

m

+p

m+1

u

m-1

(1.6)

for m = 1,2,3, … with initial values p

o

= 0, P

1

p

1

for the

P

m

's and Q

0=

1, Q

1

=q

1

for the Q

m

's.

Defining

rs

by

rs≡(pr

Q

s

-p

s

Q

r

)

(1.7)

(7)

we find from (1.6) that

pm+1

= - Δ

m,m+l

m-1 ,m

, q

m+l=

Δ

m-1

,

m+l

/ Δ

m-1

,m, (1.8) for m = 1,2.3...

Taking

1 m 1 m m, m,1

m,0

m

(z) α α z ... α z

P ≡ + + +

(1.9)

and

m m m, 2

m,2 m,1

m

(z) 1 ß z ß z ... ß z

q ≡ + + + + (1.10)

we have

f

i , j

(z)

p

m

(z)/Q

m

(z) (1.11)

with i + j = 2m, m =1,2,3 …..

Thus from a knowledge of the polynomials P

m

(z), Q

m

(z) we

can determine, using (1.7) and (1.8), the elements p

m

,q

m

of the continued fraction, where m = 1,2,3,,.

We consider the particular form of continued fraction ...

... 1 1

1

2

2 1

1 +

+ + + +

+ + d z

z n z

d z n z d n

m

m

(1.12)

where n

m

, d

m

are constants independent of z, and assume that each n

m

≠ 0 but that the d

m

's may be zero.

2. Construction of the continued fractions.

Case (i) Matching equal numbers of terms of each series We consider the sequence of rational function approximations

f

1,1 '

f

2,2, …,

f

m,m' --- In the notation of (1.4)

fm , m( z ) – f ( z ) = 0 ( zm, z- ( m + 1 )) ( 2 . 1 )

(8)

4.

Using the expansions (1.1) and (1.2) for f(z) together with (2.1) the equations for the α's and ß 's are

(2.2)

⎪ ⎪

⎪ ⎪

+ +

+ +

= +

= =

1 m 1 m 2 m,1 0 m,m 1

m m,

m,1 0 1 m,1

0 m,0

ß a ...

ß a

a

α · ·

· · ·

· · ·

· · ·

· α α a a a ß

and

⎪ ⎪

⎪ ⎪

+ +

+

− +

=

+

= =

1 m,m-1 -1 m,1

m m

, m m - m,0

1 - m m, 1 - m , m 2 - 2 - m m,

m , m 1 - 1 - m m,

ß a ...

ß ) ( a ß

a α

- α · · · · · · · · a ß · · · · a ß

- α a ß

-

(2.3)

Eliminating the

α

’s from (2,2) and (2,3) gives the equations for the ß’s. These are

(2.4)

⎪ ⎪

⎪ ⎪

⎪⎪

⎪ ⎪

= +

+ +

+

= +

+ +

+

= +

+ +

+

0 ß

a ...

...

ß a ß

a a

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

0 ß

a ...

...

ß a ß

a a

0 ß

a ...

...

ß a ß

a a

m , m 0 2

, m 3 m 1

, m 2 - m 1

- m

m , m ) 1 m ( 2

, m 1 1

, m 0 1

m , m m 2

, m 2 1

, m 1 - 0

Now Δ

m,m+1

(z)={P

m

(z)Q

m+1

(z)-P

m+1

(z)Q

m

(z)} is a polynomial in z Whose degree is at most 2m. Using (2.1) we have

) z , 0(z

f(z)}

- 1(z) ,m 1 {fm f(z)}

- m(z) {fm,

1(z) ,m 1 fm m(z) fm, 1(z) (z)Qm Qm

1(z) m Δm,

1) (m

m +

=

+

− +

=

+

− +

= + +

(9)

Consequently

Δm , m + 1

.(z) consists of a single term in z

m

This term can be determined by considering the term in z

m in

Q

m+1

(z){P

m

(z)-Q

m

(z)f(z)} i.e. in Q

m

(z)f(z). Hence

Δm,m+1

(z) + {a

m

+a

m-1

ß

m,1

. + .. + a

o

ß

m,m

}z

m

= 0 (2.5) We define the determinant D

r,s

by

r s

r s r

s r r

r

s r r

r

a a

a

a a

a

a a

a

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

1

1 1

1

+

+

+ +

D

r,s ≡ (2.6)

where r =. 0,± 1 , ± 2, .... and s = 0,1,2,... • For s < 0, D

r,s

≡ 1.

These determinants are known as Hankel determinants and occur in the theory of continued fractions which correspond to power series expansions at one point. [See for example Henrici (1958)].

Using this notation we find from (2.4) and (2.5) that 1

m , D

z 1) D

(

Δ

1 m m 1 0, m 1

m

m, = − −

+ +

(2.7) As regards Δ

m,m+2

(z) this is a polynomial of degree (2m+l) at most,

and proceeding as before we find that

(z) (z)Q Q

(z) Δ

2 m m

2 m m,

+

+

= o(z

m

,z-(

m+1)

).

Hence Δ

m,m+2

(z) consists of two terms only and is of the form

(A

m

z

m

+ A

m+1

, z

m+1 ) where the A's are constants. Clearly Am

z

m

is just

Δm,m+1

(z) and the remaining term is calculated by considering the

term in z

m+1

in Q

m+2

(z){

pm

(z)- Q

m

(z)f(z)}.

Thisis

1 m m 2 m 2,

m

C z

ß

+ + +

(10)

6.

where

C

m

≡ a

- 1

+ a

- 2

ß

m , 1 +

… . . + a

- ( m + 1 )

ß

m , m

. Eliminating the ß's from this latter result and (2.4) yields

1 , 1 , 1

=

m m

m D D

C

(2.8)

for m= 0,1,2, ... . Solving (2.4) for ß

m,m

gives us

1 , 1 1 , 0

,m

= ( − 1 )

m m m

m

D D

ß (2.9)

for m= 1,2,3, ……

Using the results (2.7) to (2.9) and (1.9) we find that

. 1

,

1 , 1

1 , 0 ,

1 , 0 1

2 , 1

1 , 0 1

, 1

, 0 1

+

+

= = −

m m m

m m

m m m

m

m

D

z D D q D

D z D D

p D (2.10)

for m= 1,2,3,..., For m =0 we find that the formulae in (2.10) still hold, save that p

1

. is constant and independent of z. Thus the

continued fraction which has for its successive convergents

f

1 , 1 ,

f

2 , 2 , . . . . ,

i s

....

1

1

2

2 1

1

+ + +

+ d z

z n z

d

n (2.11)

where

2 m 1,

2 m 0, 1

m 1,

1 m 0, m

3 m 1,

2 m 0, 2

m 1,

1 m 0,

m

D

D D

d D D ,

D D

n D

= −

=

for m = 1,2,3, ...

Case (ii) Matching unequal numbers of terms of each series

A continued fraction of the form (2.11) can be constructed using

much the same method as before, although slight differences occur.

(11)

Since in the rational function approximations (1.3) an even number of parameters is available we consider approximations

of the form f

m+2r,m

. T o obtain a continued fraction whose elements

can be expressed in a simple way, we consider firstly the sequence of convergents

f

1,1,

f

2,2

f

,… ,

f

m,m,

f

m+1 ,m-1,

f

m+2,m' .... ,

f

m+2r-1 ,m-1

,f

m+2r,m'…………..

for r = 1,2,3, …… .

This sequence leads to the continued fraction

2 r m 2, r

2 r m 1, r 2 r m 1, r

1 r m 1, r 2r

m 3

r m 2, r

2 r m 1, r 2 r m 2, r

1 r m 1, r 1 2r m

2 r 1,

2 r 0, 1 r 1,

1 r 0, r

3 r 1,

2 r 0, 2 r 1,

1 r 0, r

2 m 1

m m

m 2

2 1

1

D D D

n D D .

D D

n D

and ...m, 1,2,3,....

r for

D D D

d D D ,

D D

n D where

(2.12) ...

1 z n 1

z n z

d 1

z n z

d 1

z n z

d 1

n

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+ + +

+

=

=

=

=

=

+ + +

+ + +

for r = 1,2,3, ………

F

rom the m

th

partial quotient onwards, the continued fraction takes the form of a conventional continued fraction which corresponds to a power

series expansion at z = 0. In fact setting m = 0 in (2.12) we obtain (save for z in the first partial numerator) the continued fraction which corresponds to a single power series at z = 0.

In considering the approximation f

m+2r,m

we could also take the sequence

f

1 , o ,

f

2 , o

… … , f

2 r , o

f

2 r + 1 , 1

, … . . , f

2 r + m , m ’

… … … … . This sequence gives rise to the continued fraction

) 13 . 2 ( ...

...

...

z d 1

z ... n

...

...

z d 1

z n 1

z ... n 1

z n 1

n

m r 2

m r 2 1

r 2

1 r 2 r

2 2

1 +

+ + +

+ + +

+ +

+ +

+

(12)

8.

2 m r 1, r

2 m r r, 1

m r 1, r

1 m r r, m

2r 3

m r 1, r

2 m r r, 2

m r 1, r

1 m r r, m

2r

2 s 2, s

1 s 1, s 2 s 1, s

1 s s, 2s

3 s 2, s

2 s 1, s 2 s 2, s

1 s 1, s 1 2s

D D D

d D D ,

D D

n D

and 1,2,....r, s

for

D D D

n D D ,

D D

n D where

+

+

+

+ +

+

+

+

+ +

=

=

=

=

=

for m = 1,2,3, ...

Assuming that the expansion (1.1) is known, the result (2.12) is of use when at z = ∞ it is either difficult to determine the series or there is a good reason for not proceeding beyond a certain term in the series.

Such situations can occur when the series at z = ∞ is asymptotic.

The result (2.13) may be of use when either a

o

or a

-1

is zero.

Hitherto we have assumed that both a

o

,a

-1

, ± 0 so that n

1

= a

o

and

1 1 0

= a a

d

are both non zero. Even if this condition does not hold simple modifications are often available. Thus if a

o

= 0 but a

1

,a

2

≠ 0 we could consider the function g(z) = [f(z) - a

1

z} /z

2 . The expansions

for g(z) for |z| small and for | z

large have leading terms a

2

and -a

1

/z respectively, so that for g(z) continued fractions may be developed as before. Clearly, provided any two consecutive values of the sequence {a

n

}, n = 0, ± 1, ± 2, .. , are both non zero a suitable g(z) may be constructed.

On the other hand we could proceed as follows and form a continued fraction of the form (2.13) for the function f(z)/z in the case when

a

o

=0, but a

1

,a

2

≠ 0. Thus, we have

...

...

3 3 2

1

z d 1

z n 1

z n 1

n

+ +

+

+

where the first two terms of the series

..

....

z a z a z a

f(z)

2

3 2

1

+ + +

=

(13)

have been fitted before any of those of

...}

z a z {a z

) z ( f

3 2 2

1 + +

=

This method is more direct than the former.

3. Algorithm for the continued fractions

For continued fractions which correspond to a single power series, the well-known q-d algorithm [Rutishauser (1954), Henrici (1958)] is available for obtaining the partial numerators. It is found that for continued fractions that correspond to power series at two points, an algorithm- essentially the q-d algorithm- can be generated.

We start by assuming that in (1.1) and (1.2) a

r

≠ 0, r =0, ± 1, ± 2 ,...

and by defining

⎪ ⎪

⎪ ⎪

+ +

+ +

=

=

+ +

+

r r

r 2

2 r) 1

(

(o)

r 1 r 1 r 1

0 (r)

z }]z ... a z

a z { a [f(z) (z)

f

and f(z), (z)

...f 1,2,3,....

r for

z }]

z a ...

z a {a [f(z) (z)

f

(3.1)

Clearly f

(r)(z)

possesses the expansions

f

(r)

(z) = a

r

+ a

r+1

z +a

r+2

+ z

2

+ for |z| small and

⎭ ⎬

⎩ ⎨

⎧ + + + + +

=

+

...

z a z ... a z

a z (z) a

f

(r) r 1 r22 0r r11

for | z

large. Consequently for f(

r)

(z) we can forra the continued fraction

...

(r) 3 (r) 3 (r)

2 (r) 2 (r)

1 r

z d 1

z n z

d 1

z n z

d 1

a

+ +

+

+ +

+ (3.2)

for r = 0, ± 1, ± 2, …….

(14)

10.

Now the continued fraction (3.2) can be regarded as the even part of

⎪ ⎪

⎪ ⎪

+

= +

=

− +

− +

− +

}, m d d {n d },

d {n n l where

1 z m 1 l 1

z m 1 l 1

z d 1 a

(r)1 (r) i (r) i

1 (r) i i (r) (r) i

1 (r) i (r) i i (r) i

(r) (r) 3

3 (r) (r) 2

(r) 2 1 r

(3.3)

for r = 0, + 1, + 2, .. and 1 = 2,3,4 … The odd part of (3.3) is

z m l

1

z m l z

d l 1

z d

a a

(r)

1 (r) 3

(r) 2 (r) 2 (r)

1 (r) 2

(r) r 1

r

+ − +

+

− −

Thus the function

{f

(r)

(z)

a

r

} z generates the continued fraction

z m l

1

z m l z

d l 1

d a

(r) 2 (r)z

(r)2 (r)2 (r)

1 (r) 2

1(r) r

+ + −

+

− −

(3.4)

But

{f

(r)

(z)

a

r

} z

=

f

(r+1)

(z)

which has the continued fraction

. ...

z d 1

z n z

d 1

z n z

d 1

a

1) (r 3 1) (r 3 1)

(r 2 1) (r 2 1)

(r 1

1

r

+

+ + + +

+

+

+ +

+ +

+ (3.5)

By an equivalence transformation (3.4) can be brought into the form (3.5) and equating the various coefficients leads to

(3.6)

⎪⎭

⎪ ⎬

⎫ +

= +

+

= +

++ ++

+

+ + +

(r) i 1) (r

1 i 1) (r

1 i (r)

1 i

1) (r i 1) (r i (r) i (r)

1 i

d n

d n

d n

d n

for i = 2,3,4, ….. and r = 0,± 1, ± 2 , Now directly from (3.2) we have

(3.7) ..

2, 1, 0, r ,

a a

d

(r) r r 1

1 = − = ± ±

(15)

11.

and equating the constant terms of (3.4) and (3.5) and using (3.7) we fund that

1) (r 1 (r)

1 (r)

2

d d

n + =

+

Thus if we define n

1(r)

≡ 0 for r = 0 , ± 1, ± 2, .. and calculate

d

1(r)

by (3.7), then (3.6) may be used to calculate the subsequent n's and d.s. The rules of formulation follow the characteristic pattern of the q-d algorithm.

M M

M M

M M

M M

L L L L L L L L L M

M M

M M

M M

M

(4) 4 (4)

4 (4)

3 (4)

3 (4)

2 (4)

2 (4)

1

(3) 4 (3)

4 (3)

3 (3)

3 (3)

2 (3)

2 (3)

1

(2) 4 (2)

4 (2)

3 (2)

3 (2)

2 (2)

2 (2)

1

(1) 4 (1)

4 (1)

3 (1)

3 (1)

2 (1)

2 (1)

1

(0) 4 (0)

4 (0)

3 (0)

3 (0)

2 (0)

2 (0)

1

1) (4 1)

(4 1)

(3 1) (3 1)

(2 1)

(2 1)

1(

2) (4 2)

(4 2)

(3 2) (3 2)

(2 2)

(2 2)

1(

3) (4 3)

(4 3)

(3 3) (3 3)

(2 3)

(2 3)

1(

4) (4 4)

(4 4)

(3 4) (3 4)

(2 4)

(2 4)

1(

d n

d n

d n

d 0

d n

d n

d n

d 0

d n

d n

d n

d 0

d n

d n

d n

d 0

d n

d n

d n

d 0

d n

d n

d n

d 0

d n

d n

d n

d 0

d n

d n

d n

d 0

d n

d n

d n

d 0

We refer to the above arrangement as the n-d array. The inset block shows how from d

1(r)

the subsequent n's and d's are calculated.

The continued fraction which fits equal numbers of terms of (1.1) and (1.2) is in this notation.

...

(0) 3 (0) 3 (0)

2 (0) 2 (0)

1 0

z d 1

z n z d 1

z n z d 1

a

+ +

+ + +

+ (3.8)

(16)

12.

the appropriate n's and d ' s lying along the central row of the n-d array.

Given say the firat four terms of (1.1) and (1.2), i.e. a

r

for r = -4,-3,..,3 we calculate the entries which lie inside the outer block in the n-d array.

These include the first four partial quotients of the continued fraction (3.8).

The n-d array may be used for other purposes and in other ways.

Clearly the continued fractions corresponding to all the functions f

(r)

(z) are available.

Further since in (3.6) the individual n's and d's enter linearly, the entries in the n-d array could be generated from initial conditions other than those given in (3.7). For example if f(z) possesses a single series

expansion, namely (1,1 ) , we can construct (in our notation) the corresponding continued fraction

....

...

(0) 3 (0)

0 2

1 n 1

z n 1

a

+ +

+

This problem is solved, conventionally, by a direct application of the q-d algorithm. Here the problem oan be solved by setting

d

1(r)

= - a

r

/a

r-1

, r=1,2,3 ... and d

i(o)

0, i = 1,2,3 ...

Equation (3.6) then enable the entries in the n-d array, on and below the n

(o)

, d

(o)

row, to be completed in the usual way. If needed, the entries above the n

(o)

,d

(o)

row can be obtained by solving (3.6) for

(r) 1

n

i+

and d

i(r)

in terms of the other n's and d's in the equations.

It is found that

( ) ( )

( ) ( )

(ri 11)

1) (r i 1) (r i (r)

1 i 1) (r

1 i 1) (r

1 i

1) (r

1 i 1) (r i 1) (r i (r) i 1) (r

1 i 1) (r

1 i

n d n

n d n

d d n

d d n

++ + + +

++ ++

++ + +

++ ++

+

= +

+

= +

We can also use (3.6) to construct continued fractions which fit a finite

(17)

number of terms of, say, (1.2) and all the terms of (1.1). In this problem we are given a

r

for r = - m,-(m-l), -(m-2), ……, and we set

1(r)

d = - a

r

/a

r-1

, r = - (m-1), -(m-2), … , and

(0)i

d = 0 , i = (m+1), (m + 2), ... .

In the resulting continued fraction the (m+2r)

th

convergent is f

m+2r,m

and the (m+2r+l)

th

convergent is f

m+2r+1,m-1 as in (2.12).

With suitable initial conditions the continued fraction (2.13), and others, may be generated from the n-d array.

The algorithm (3.6) can be reconciled with the results of previous section as follows. In determinant form we see from (2.11) that

2 i 1, r

2 i r, 1

i 1, r

1 i (r) r,

i 3

i 1, r

2 i r, 2

i 1, r

1 i (r) r,

i

D

D D

d D D ,

D D

n D

=

=

i =

1,2,3, ... ,

r = 0, ± 1, ± 2, ...

Substituting these results into the first equation in (3.6) and rearranging leads to

2 i 1, r 2 i 1, r

2i 2 r, i

r, 3 i r, 1

i 1, r 1 i 1, r

2i 1 r, i

r, 2 i r,

D D

D D

D D

D

D D

D

+

+

− = −

for i = 2,3,4, …, r = 0,± 1, ± 2, .. •

Now the Hankel determinants D

r,s

have the known property that

0 D

D D

D

D

2r,i1

r,i2 r,i

+

r1,i+1 r+1,i1

=

[See for example Henrici (1958)], and thus the first equation of (3.6)

is established. On substituting the determinants into the second

equation of (3.6) it reduces to an identity. The particular case

i = 1 of (3.6) is easily verified. We have thus demonstrated the

(18)

14.

connection between the algorithm (3.6) and the determinant results of Section 2.

4. Effects of zero coefficients in the series.

In the n-d array the entries which are affected by the coefficient a

1

, lie between the solid lines in the following table

M M

M M

M M

M M

M M

M M

) 4 ( 3 )

4 ( 3 )

4 ( 2 )

4 ( 2 )

4 ( 1

) 3 ( 3 )

3 ( 3 )

3 ( 2 )

3 ( 2 )

3 ( 1

) 2 ( 3 )

2 ( 3 )

2 ( 2 )

2 ( 2 )

2 ( 1

) 1 ( 3 )

1 ( 3 )

1 ( 2 )

1 ( 2 )

1 ( 1

) 0 ( 3 )

0 ( 3 )

0 ( 2 )

0 ( 2 )

0 ( 1

) 1 ( 3 ) 1 ( 3 ) 1 ( 2 ) 1 ( 2 ) 1 ( 1

) 2 ( 3 ) 2 ( 3 ) 2 ( 2 ) 2 ( 2 ) 2 ( 1

) 3 ( 3 ) 3 ( 3 ) 3 ( 2 ) 3 ( 2 ) 3 ( 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

d n

d n

d

d n

d n

d

d n

d n

d

d n

d n

d

d n

d n

d

d n

d n

d

d n

d n

d

d n

d n

d

If a

1

= 0 and all other a ' s are non zero we have d

1(1)

=0 and

) 2 (

d

1

=∞ • To calculate subsequent entries we set a

1

= € → say and then let ε→ 0 in the affected elements. The results are

) /a a d (n )n /a (a d

d n

n d

n ) a0 a d (n 0 d

n d

n 0 d

(4.1) )

d a a d ( n d

n 0 d

) d a a d ( n d

n

0 (3) 2

1 (3) 2 (3) 0 3 (3) 2

3 (3)

2 (3) 3 (3) 2 (3) 2

(1) 3 (3) 2

1 (3) 2 (2) (1) 3

(1) 3 (1) 2

(0) 2 1

(0) 0 1 (3) 2

1 (1) 3 (1)

2 (1)

2 (0)

1

(0) 0 1 (0) 2

2 (0) 3 (0)

1 (0) 2

=

=

=

= =

=

=

=

+

=

=

=

=

+

=

=

(19)

All other entries may be calculated in the usual way.

If the continued fraction is constructed directly from the series

(1-1) and (1.2) using determinants, the condition a

1

= 0 and all other a's ≠ 0 does not give rise to any difficulty. The trouble occurs in the subsidiary continued fractions in the n-d array as indicated by (4.l).

It is clear from (4.1) that zero coefficients make calculations for the n-d array very cumbersome and it is certainly easier for numerical purposes to modify f(z).

If some of the coefficients - other than a

o

or a

-1 - in the

expansions (1.1) and (1.2) of f(z) are zero, we consider the function

g(z)≡ f(z) - K/(-1+z) (4.2)

where the constant K is chosen such that the coefficients in the corresponding expansions of g(z) are non-zero. The continued fraction of the form (1.12) for g(z) can be calculated from the n-d algorithm in the usual way. The continued fraction for f(z) can thus be expressed as the sum of the continued fraction for g(z) and the rational function K/(l+z). To construct the continued fraction for f(z) in the form ( 1 . 1 2 ) we proceed as follows.

Suppose the continued fraction for f (z) is z ...

d 1

z ... n

z d 1

z n z d 1

n

m m 2

2 1

1

+

+ + + +

+ + (4.3)

with convergents to N

m

/D

m

, m = 1,2,3 ...., and that for g(z) is z ...

q 1

z ... p

z q 1

z p z q 1

p

m m 2

2 1

1

+

+ + + +

+ +

(4.4)

with convergent P

m

/Q

m

,

m=1,2,3,

...

The polynomials N

m

,P

m

are of degree (m-1) in z and D

m

,Q

m

of

degree m in z.

(20)

16.

Define

⎪⎭

⎪⎬

m 2 1 m m

2 1 m

m 2 1 m m

2 1 m

...d d d δ ,

..p p p ß

...n n n α ,

..p p p

α

(4.5)

and λ

m

, /µ

m

to be respectively the coefficients of z in the polynomials Q

m

,D

m

) 6 . 4 ( ,...

3 , 2 , 1 ,

,...

3 , 2 , 1 ,

1 1

1 1 1

1 1

1 1 1

⎪⎪

⎪⎪

⎪⎪

⎪⎪

=

= +

+

=

=

= +

+

=

+ + +

+ + +

d µ

m n

d µ µ

whilst

q

m p

q Thus

m m

m m

m m

m m

λ λ λ

We suppose that all the p's and q's in (4.4) are known and that the n's and d's in (4.3) are chosen such that

) z , D 0(z

z)Q (1

D KQ ) Q N D z)(P (1 or

) z , D 0(z

N z 1

k q

p

1) (m m m

m

m m m

m m m

1) (m m m

m m

m

+

+

+ =

+

− +

= + −

+

The numerator on L.H.S. is of degree 2m at most and the denominator is of degree (2m+l), Hence for R.H.S. to hold the numerator of L.H.S.

consists of a single term in z

m

Let this be

Cmzm

where C

m

is a constant which depends on m but not on z. Thus

m m

m m m

m m

m

D Q

z K C

D N Q

) P z 1

( ⎟⎟ ⎠ + ≡

⎜⎜ ⎞

⎛ −

+ (4.7)

(21)

Using this result and that

1 m m m 1

m m 1 m

m

Q P Q ( 1) α z

P

+

+

≡ −

+

we find

(4.8) D

D y Q

Q z) α (1 1) D (

Q C D

Q z C

1 m m

1 m 1

m m

1 m m

m m

m 1

m 1 m

1 m

⎭ ⎬

⎩ ⎨

⎧ −

+

− +

+ + +

+ +

+ +

(4.9) α

ß y δ α δ

ß y

) λ 1 µ (1 α ) µ λ

(1 y α

y Thus

δ δ

y ß

ß 1) α δ (

ß 0 C

)}

µ µ (1 y ) λ λ (1 {α 1) ( )C µ (λ C

) y - (α (-1) C

0

have we 2m 1, 0, r for z of ts coefficien equating

by (4.8) From

1 m 1 m 1

m m 1 m 1

m 1 m m

m m

m m 1 m m

1 m 1 m

1 m m

1 m 1

m m

1 m m m

m m

1 m m 1

m 1 m m 1

m m m

m m 1

m

1 m 1 m m m

r

⎪ ⎭

⎪ ⎬

=

− +

− +

=

⎭ ⎬

⎩ ⎨

⎧ −

− +

=

− + +

= +

=

=

+ +

+ + +

+

+

+

+ + +

+

+ +

+ +

+

+ +

for m = 1,2,3, ...

These equations together with (4.5) and (4.6) and the initial values n

1

,d

1

given by

q K P d n

K P n

1 1 1 1

1 1

+

= +

=

are sufficient to determine the subsequent ns and d's.

5. Error of the approximations

The chief aim of the present paper has been the construction of the

continued fractions. The problem of estimating the error between a given

function and the m

th

convergent of its continued fraction has not been

fully investigated. However from the preceding work several useful

Références

Documents relatifs

5°/Montrer que tous les points de l'axe des abscisses ont leurs images par l'application f situées sur un même cercle ( C ) que l' on précisera. 6°/Soit M un point du cercle

[r]

We determine the structure of the injective limit of the cohomology groups by analysing the relative cohomology groups using Theorem 2.16.. So in what follows, we assume that N is

The object of the present paper is to consider L(r) for certain starlike mappings f(z) satisfying some subordination in U.. AMS 2010 Subject Classification:

Note: This examination consists of ten questions on one page. a) For a rectangular matrix B, what is its singular value decomposition? Illustrate with a simple example. b)

Comme le polygone Z 0 est équilatéral, il réalise un cas d'égalité dans la formule de Cauchy-Schwarz de la

Soit il est un carré soit une somme de deux carrés non nuls donc de la forme u u pour un entier de Gauss u.. Soit z un entier de Gauss ni nul

Montrer que g se prolonge en une fonction holomorphe sur le disque