• Aucun résultat trouvé

Subject

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Subject"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

MOSIG

P erformance E

valuation

Optimal Control and Admission in a Queue

Let us consider a system made by one queue with independent exponential service time with rateµ. Arrivals are modeled by Poisson process with rateλand the queue capacity isC. Whenever a packet arrives and finds the system full, the packet is rejected.

—– Question 1 :Basic Model

Compute analytically the probabilityprof rejection.

Now assume that when the system is full, an incoming packet is not rejected but sent to a secondary queue whose capacity isC2and its service rate isµ2.

—– Question 2 :Simulator

Write a program that simulates the behavior of the system. Validate (partially) your program using the first question.

Let us consider another system made of two queues where packets are sent to queue 1 with probability1−prand to queue 2 with probabilitypr, regardless of the current backlog in the buffers.

—– Question 3 :Equivalent Network ?

Are those system different in terms of the average number of packets in both queues ?

In the following we introduce a controller that rejects the packets before full capacity to reduce the cost of the system. The cost is : the average response time of the accepted packets +Rדthe probability of rejection”.

—– Question 4 :

If the controller decides to reject with probabilityq, compute its average cost and its optimal rejection probability.

Now the controller uses a different strategy of rejection. For each packet, the controller takes a deterministic decision : accept (a= 1) or reject (a= 0).

—– Question 5 :Transitions

Let us consider the discrete time version of the system. Letp=µ/(µ+λ)andq=λ/(µ+λ).

construct the transition matrices for the two actionsa= 1anda= 0.

—– Question 6 :Cost function

Ifxis the current number of packets in the system, find the instantaneous costg(x, a)to minimize the average response time of the packets when they are not rejected while each rejected packet costs R.

—– Question 7 :Finite horizon

Find the finite horizon optimal policy under the following data :µ= 3, λ= 2, C = 10(with an adequate final cost).

—– Question 8 :Infinite horizon

Compute the infinite horizon policy withµ= 3, λ= 2, C = 10, α= 0.9.

Can you describe the optimal policy ? Let us assume the the arrival rate is not well known.

We only know thatλ∈[λ1, λ2].

—– Question 9 :M

ake a numerical study that tests if this uncertainty degrades the performance of the controller.

—– Question 10 :multiple queues

MOSIG PDES 2012 1/ 2

(2)

MOSIG

P erformance E

valuation

Consider again the system made of2queues with respective rates/mun. The controller routes the packets.

Adapt the previous approach for optimal control in this case. Can you give properties of the optimal policy in the infinite horizon case ?

MOSIG PDES 2012 2/ 2

Références

Documents relatifs

The paper first recalls the theoretical principles of the MAPAS procedure, then presents the MAPAS method as a particular application of a more general test called the MSPRT,

For the class of the almost-periodic functions, a non normal limit distribution for the normalized error of the time average estimate can be obtained when the normalizing factor

1 Published in Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science 46, issue 3, 259-273, 2012 which should be used for any reference to this work. The original publication is available

His work describing how learn- ing methods can be used with retrieval models and index- ing anticipated the current interest in learning ranking func- tions, his development

Physically, this means that at energies of this order pions (which are the lightest hadrons) can be produced in collisions of protons in cosmic rays with CMB photons, which prevents

In 1800, Carl Friedrich Gauss, the German mathematician, produces formulas to calculate the date of Easter day.. Here is a simplified method, valid from year 1900 to year 2099 of

If this typology of emotions (referred and expressed) is related with the voices, it can be observed that Presenter 2 of “In the Mother’s Womb”, a maximum

Figure 3A,B shows optical microscopy images of the top view of each layer (top row) and SEM images of the cross-section for each layer (bottom row), the latter of which were used