A NNALI DELLA
S CUOLA N ORMALE S UPERIORE DI P ISA Classe di Scienze
O LIVER E. G LENN
Invariants when the transformation is infinitesimal, and their relevance in bio-mathematics and in the theory of terrestrial magnetism
Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze 3
esérie, tome 8, n
o1-2 (1954), p. 1-42
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=ASNSP_1954_3_8_1-2_1_0>
© Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, 1954, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze » (http://www.sns.it/it/edizioni/riviste/annaliscienze/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisa- tion commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale.
Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
INFINITESIMAL, AND THEIR RELEVANCE
IN BIO-MATHEMATICS AND IN THE THEORY OF
TERRESTRIAL MAGNETISM
OLIVER E. GLENN
(1,a,nsdowne, Pennsylvania)
.
§I.
HISTORICJAL INTRODUCTION
A
theory
of infinitesimaltransformations,
due to SOPHUS LIE(1),
wasbased upon certain relations in three
variables xi
and threeparameters
uiviz.,
It was assumed that
Xz
can beexpanded
in a series of powers of ui ; that there will be nosingularities
in the way; that0,
and that~(~i?~2?~3?~)~~~’
Then(1)
takesthe form,
’
It is
implicit
in formulations that the secondpart
of therelation
never is cancelled
although
eachterm
may have twosmall
factors. Much attention is claimedby
the case where cartesianplane
coordinates
and X3
= I theslope
of a line-element of thepoint (x ~ y) .
(1)
Matheuiatische Anualen, Bande 5, 8,, und 11; 1872-1878.1. Annali della Scuola Norm. Sup. - Pisa.
Here the
particularization ui = 2c2 = u3 = ~ t
isadopted,
and the inva- riance ofl .= d y - expressed by
therelatioii ,
yis a total
(necessary
andsufficient)
condition in order that(2)
should be acontact transformation. In
three-space
the condition for an elementverein(connection)
of surface elementsis,
a 7 2 being
the coordinates of direction of thetangent plane
at(x, y, z).
The total condition for a contact
trausformation, V,
ofsurfaces,
is the re-lation of
invariance,
under V ,
7Some transformations V will bave a
special
infinitesimal form like(2), t
and all form agroup I V) -
’
We
generalize by studying
the invariance of anarbitrary quantic
H=in
r 0
as the facients inH, and adopt
the usual relations between the cartesian and the
polar coordinate, viz.,
We consider both the direct and the inverse invariant
problems,
andmake
extensions,
to rnvariables,
whichgeneralize
theconcepts
and theories,
of connection and contact. This mathematics is then
applied
in thestudy
of two
problems
which are dominatedby
orbitaltheory,
one in bio-mathematics and the other in the
theory
of terrestrialmagnetism (2).
(2) Since the present paper was written I have eeen the following two recent me-
moirs which are developed by means of the tellsorial calculus : A. KAWAGUCHI, On the theory of ~non-linear connections : I. Introduction to the theory of
general non-linear
con- u6ctions, Tensor, N. S., vol. 2, 1952, p. 123-142.,
.
HLAYA’1’Y, Embedding theory of a Wm in a Wn, Rendiconti del Circolo Matematioo di Palermo, S. II, t. 1, 1952, p. 403-438, (See especially, DEFINITION, p. 429).
t For a method of proof see Lm und SCHEFFERS, Geom. deu Berührungstr., 1896, S. 90.
The
differential equation for invariants
The
transformation
on theplan
of(2)
isaccordingly,
y °in
which I
are - 0 . Since any u , v, w may be eitherpositive
or
negative,
weordiuarily
assume 0( r , 9) , ( ? ? 0), Q (g r 9)
to bepositive functions,
on any continuous space-interval
considered,
and that .g and itspartial
derivatives do not
approach
the infinite on the interval.Substitntion from U in H enables us to form an
expansion,
and thehypothesis,
with M
constant,
leads to theequation,
in
the direct invariantproblem
theequation
is to be solvedfor
H,
transformation Ubeing given.
Tlleauxiliary system
of LAGRANGE is as follows:and three
particular integrals,
out of sixrequisite
for acomplete integral
of
~jH~:=:0~
arereadily
found in theforms,
-(constants ’ yi arbitrary).
Three additional
particular integrals
can be found in various caseswhere the functions
0, Q
have a morespecial
form. After H is foundas the
complete integral
of 7 theproblem
of theintegration
of theMoNGE
equation
H = 0 can be considered.The
following
are theparticularizations
which we shallemphasize
most:in which the caefficients a,
b ,
.. ,7 a 7 fl
.. ,7 9 7 l
.. are real nnmbers and each variable (p , r , 9 may varyonly
over itsfinite,
continuous range(3).
The tranformation U becomes
Ui (u ,
v ,w); t
11’
Here
Ut, generates
agroup
which satisfies thefollowing symbolism :
The
group
will be finite and of order vif,
for someinteger
v,and otherwise of infinite
order,
butY~z , increases,
must allremain = 0 , Three additional
particular integrals
of(4)
are now;in
which,
,Hence the
complete integral here, whether H
is aquantic
or a more gener-al
function, is ;
c.4$
being
anarbitrary
function of its sixarguments.
If H is assumed to bea
quantic,
it is of theform,
(3) That is, some use will be made of equations +
q2 xe 2
+ .. + qe, torepresent a function determined by e points on a plane continuous interval,
((xl,y~),..,
I, (x2 ,
y2)~ ,
that contains no singularities of the function.t As long as u, v, w are parameters, each is the real continuum, in the vicinity of
the origin. Compare the disoussion at § I1, (16) and following.
It is then a MONGE
expression
in which the differentialarguments
are absolute invariants of the
group U1 ) .
Thefunctional arguments
of thetype
are relative invariantsof (U,)
whichsatisfy
therelations,
When M is
constant,
theexpressions (7), (8)
constitute afundamental
sys-of
MONGE invariantsof
thegroup
However the
group
may reduce to asubgroup of i Ul I because,
if atypical
coefficient in H’ is apolynomial,
."the relation .H~’ = M H
gives,
In
particular
cases this setof, equations
may restrict thepolynomial,
andit
may restrict the group to one of thesubgroups of Ui).
It isnot,
how-ever, necessary a
p1’iori
that thetypical
coefficient in H should be a ra-tional, integral polynomial
in the relative invariants.If H has constant coefficients it can be
linearly
factorable. If its order iu the differentials is h this willimply
thevanishing
-1)
non-2
linear
expressions
in its2 1 (h + 1) (h + 2)
coefficients. This wouldleave
2
H in a form that is a natural
generalization
of abinary quantic, which.
theoretically,
isalways linearally
factorable. If the factors ofH,
with con-stant
coefficient,
are,°
the
problem
ofintegrating
H = 0 reduces to that of theintegration
ofIZ
-0.
Here Il
is an exact differential and itsintegral
curves areknown
to formthe
system
of any and allanalytic
curves on thesingle
surface(4),
With I
chosen,
sinceh
isinvariant,
theintegral
curvesof 11 -
0 are per-, muted
by transformations i Ul) .
Sincethey
are all on asiugle surface, it,
(.L
-0),
is unalteredby U l’ whence,
. .The group under which the surface
.L - 0
is invariantis, therefore, a
symbolized by
therelation,
Since,
in thissymbol,
ttt , u2 aredependent infinitesimals, i U2]
is a formalsubgroup
of( v~ ~
aslong
as the vi, arearbitrary
infinitesima,ls.Theorem. The
equation
~I = 0¡represents
hsurfaces
which arerespectively
invariant under h
subgroups of {U 1}.
Thesesubgroups
ntay not all bemutually
exclusive.
t
.,
Invariant
curvesWith I
and the coefficientsAl 7,. - Dz chùsen,
as statedabove,
thetorus,
based on any curve N= 0 in the
(cp, r) plane, (9 = 0),
intersects the
corresponding
surface L - 0 in a curve invariant undera for
which.simultaneously
(4) FORSYTH, Differential- Gleichungen, 1889, S. 290.
t They may not if, for all consecutive pairs
D2~ ,
the relationvi /
1Vt -v2 ~ w~
= 0 is satisfied.This curve is therefore invariant under the
one-parameter sub-group ( U3; ~ of I U2)
I for which thesymbol is,
a result of considerable
generality,
since 1 may assume any one of h values.Secondly,
y if two of thesub-groups,
mentioned in the abovetheorem, coincide,
the curve ofintersection
of the twocorresponding
surfaces .L = 0 is an invariant of the commonsub-group.
Third,
there are threeconfigurations
which areasymptotic
to surface .Lor
nearly
so, winch would otherwise cut Z==0 in invariant curves,wiz., (1)
any
plane
(p =0 ,
qzbeing
a root of u o(cp) == 0; (2)
anysphere
r =
0 ,
7being
a root of vp(r)
=0;
and(3)
any cone 9 -9i
=0 , 8a being
a root of wq(9)
_-_ 0 .Fourth, however,
we canidentify
other classes of curves, which are invariant in theplane (cp, Ir),
which is theplane (x, y). When
thepolar
transformation
is,
,I
symbolized by,
.the solution for the
quantic .B (g~ , r , d g~ , d r)~ universally
invariant under{~ , by
the method for the case of threevariables,. gives,
Here the variables are
polar
or cartesianaccording
topreference.
A geo- metricalinterpretation
of anyequation, Zf=0y
inwith constant
coefficients,
may be stated thus: There exist h curves in the(g , y)
each invariant under acorresponding sub-group of {s} .
(5) The product 8 (u, v) 8 (u, v) will be referred to as the
simple
square of B.This is because .g
is,
intheory,
factorable into h factors of thetype,
so that the
equation,
ycontains all of the
theory
of theintegrals
of H _-_ 0 . A curve g _-_ 0 is in- variant under all transformationsIs)
forwhich,
and therefore under the one
parameter sub-group
whosesymbol
isWhen
there are no furtherhypotheses
the curves arepermuted
atrandom
by
trasformations(s)
outside ofIs,) .
Generalizations
Referring
to the tranformation U in theoriginal theory,
y in which thevariables may be
cartesian,
we. consider aquantic H
in the differentialshaving
coefficients which are functionsof x, y, z, OT 7 A where a I A
are the variables of direction of a surface elementthrough
the
point (x, y, z).
Let( U) become by adjunction
ofT;
With M constant the
corresponding
S~ .g - 0 is anequation having
eleventerms.
Then, with
functionsparticularized
topolynomials
asin
the whole
group
may includeU,
andTi,
where, ..
with,
>
(real polynomials).
The invariant MONGE
expressions,
underTI) ,
is then of theform,
where,
with the other
integrals,
andexponentials,
as iu(8).
It is to be understoodthat the
exponential
relative invariants occur in such functional combina-tions,
in the coefficients ofH,
that thesecoefficients,
and thequantic
asa
whole,
are invariants with a relationholding
in the form(12). Existence
for H(3) is established
by
theproduct
of an H with constantcoefficients, by
the fiveexponential
invariants themselves:Now the
equation
H(3) = 0 may be said to define asituation
like con-nection in
3-space,
since it is anequation
that involves the coordinates x , y, z of apoint
wath thepartial slopes ;n, A
of thepoints typical
surfaceelement,
and both of these sets with the differentials.A more
complete
formulation is thefollowing :
Definition.
If the groupis U, T j ,
and 11 is aquantic
in the differen-tials, satisfying ,~ H= 0 ,
7 then H= 0 defines ageneralized
connection of surface elements. The relation g is a total condition in order thata transformation
(U, T)
should preserve ageneralized type
of contact be-tween surfaces
(6).
"In this definition and
subsequently
we can allow M to be a functionof the
variables,
the other features of the above
theory being
left unaltered. Thisbeing
as-(6) We shall refer to the traditional concepts, connection, and contact transforma-
tion, respectively, as the elementary cases. They will be in contrast with whatever are I
represented
geometrically,
at the point (x, y , z) , y by H = 0, and by B’ = M H. A partic-, lar
case of thegeneralized
contact is where two surfaces intersect in a closed spatialoval
of infinitesimal dimensions.sumed,
fiveparticular integrals
of S .g3 - 0 will remainunchanged.
Theseare,
Since the other five
particular integrals
may be obtainedby solving
fiveproperly
chosenintegrals
forH,
the former arenecessarily invariants Vi
each of which willsatisfy
a relation of invariance of theform,
A
quite general
form of thequautic
H isthen;
The
following
theorem issubject
to thepostulate
that is introduced in theproof;
Theorern. is inva1’iant
for
crllk,
thequantic
H is ter1n-wi8e incariant and its terms have a common modulus.
From the relation of invariance of
ViZ-7
we snbtract that of the last term
of Ck, ident est,
On the left the result is cancellation of the last term of
Ck.
On theright we obtain,
We next subtract from
(~i£
-t;k)
==D1,
with theresult ;
Repeating
the process p times we reachDp == 0 , whence,
Postulate. In the invariant
theory
with wjrich we are c011cerned there exists no linear relation between the ’1toduliM(k) , Njk
and the tern,stjk .
Therefore
If we now
subtract,
from the relation of invariance ofH,
Iviz.,
the relation for the last term
hq of H,
y idemest, hq
=Npq hq,
so as to can-cel the last term of
H’,
andrepeat
the process qtines,
weobtain,
sincethe differential
products,
are not
linearally
connected with theexpressions
-The
expressions dxlo (x) ,
..,dX/n (X) , (i 1,
..,5)
constitute afundamen-
tal
system of
MONGE inva1’iantsof ( Ui , Ti) .
If H is of order- h in the
differentials,
aud the conditions for its linearfactorability
aresatisfied,
its factorsgive
as many Pfaffianequations
of thetype
of ~T =0 , where,
and J’ = M
J, (ei constant).
~
’
The
inverse invarianttheory
In an inverse
problem
the invariant isgiven,
hereby being
a solutionof Q H=
(I,
y and it isrequired
todetermine, possibly
in terms of functionsiu
part arbitrary,
y the transformations. If thesegenerate
thesub-group
ofone infinitesimal
parameter
ubtainedby making
in(U,T),
thensince u will occur in M = ill
(x,
y 7 -, , I-r ~A) ,
we have llT - u, whence1110
== 1. Since we shall wish togeneralize
the number ofvariables,
we writeXi , 2 X2 x3
respectively for x,
y , z;P1 ~ .~’2
for0, P, Q ;
yQ1, Q2 for R , S
and
Å.f’ Å.2 for n,A.
The tranformation in n
variables x1 ,
.., Xu and n - 1partial slopes
~i ? ’ ’ ? is,
(i =1 , .. ~ n ; j = 1 ~ , . , n
-1; 0) ,
Thecorresponding operator
is
D’n,
which becomesDn
when all is dividedcutoff:
where
M,
in H’ = M .. .~1 ~
.. ,~"_1,
ui> , .. ,u(2,~-j)) H,
is ex-pansible
intoWhen,
with?==3y
weassign H
and make vanishideiitically,
I
~2
are determined 1P3
aresubjected
to conditions. In par- ticular if H is either of thequantics,
the known conditions
that T)
be a group of contact tranformations areobtained, (LIE
und~SCHEFFERS,
lococitato,
~’ . 93 und S.598).
If we as-sume that .g is
quadratic, adopt
thenotatious,
and
choose,
then the
quadratic, (in dxi, dÂj),
1Q3 H2
has theexpressions (13)
below as~ coefficients. Note that if we eliminate 6 from the first six
equations (~3),
there will remain five
non-homogeneous equations,
linear in from which each ofPi, Qj
is determined in terms of thepartial
derivatives of.P1, P2, P3
and of the coefficients ofsubject
to the determinant condi- tion forconsistency.
The last three of these
equations give
thefactorability condition (dis-
criminant)~
~a condition on
H2 ,
Existence is establishedby
the case i..
Another
special
instanceis,
...We consider next the
problem
where .g is of order i)i iii ndifferen-
tials. In the AKONHOLD
symbolism
we thenhave,
As wax done in
7/g,
we assume that the term8 ofH,~
arearranged
innormal
order,
so thedifferences Q1
- Q2 , 01 - °2 , .. , Wi- W2
for any two consecutiveterms,
satisfy
the rule that the first difference of theset,
which is not zero, isnegative.
Therespective
coefficients inHm
can then beplaced
in serial cor-respondence
with the succession ofpositive integers,
1,2
.. ; thatis, they
are .. , ill the
2 , .., where C
is thenumber of terms in an n-ary m-ic. We
have,
°
this relatioa
being
anidentity
in the variables.The
terms tki
with the factor haverespective
coefficientsAki
whichare linear and
homogeneous in Pzz , ...
Wliatever iis,
the eli-minant of these terms is a matrix
Dm
of 11, rowsand q coluinns, q being the
number of terms in an n - ary
(»1 -1 ) -
ic. The laws of the structure of this matrix are,complicated
but we can write it for theternary
m - ic(~n ~ 1) ~
as follows :
Evidently D3,
terminatesby
its own laws when the number of columnsreaches 8 2 (m 1 . -- )
The conditionD3 =
m 0 isexacting
g since it meansthat
- 2 essential determinants of the third order mustvanish,
identi-cally
X2 , ,t:311 ’
7 ifHm
is to be an invariant.When
Hn,
is thegeneral quadratic quantic
in u differentialsd X1 ,
... ,is a determinant of order it the natural
geueralization
of the dis-criminant of the
ternary quadratic.
When it> 3, however,
thevanishing
of this
determinant does
not cause thequadratic
todegenerate.
If tit
> 2 , n
=3 ,
thevanishng
ofthe ~
- 2 essential determinants ofD)
m is notequivalent
to the existence ofthe 1 111 (m - 1)
known con-2 ditions for the linear
factorability
ofThe
equations
which involve o , from the terms of(14)
free fromd Âi,
are
non-homogeneous
linearequations
inP, ,
... ,Pun , Q1 ,
... ,and
remain of that
type
when a is eliminated. If n.- 3 ~
1 the condition for the .consistency
of this linearsystem, since,
’
is
readily
found to be thenon-vanishing
of the matrixEm :
None of the fifth order determinants should van-
ish. The
following
conclusion for n - spuce is now evident :Tlteorent. A total condition in order that
Hm
- 0 shoulddefine
a gene- ralized connectionof surface-elements,
andH,,,,,
= MHnt
aspecies of general-
ized contact consists
of En m =4= 0,
and thevanislzing of
theset,
When these conditions are
ftilfilled,
thefnnctions P1 ? ... ~ Pn , 7 Qi
77 Qn-1
are
expressed linea,1’(f,ly
in termsof"
thefirst partial
derivativesof P.
taken
with regard
toonly,
andrationally
in termsof
thecoef-
ficients
of Hm,
andof
thefirst partial
derivativesof
the lattercoefficients,
taken with
regard
to ..., Xn , 7 ... ..This defines connection
broadly.
In somegeometric problems
it may bepreferable
to use aspecial
case of thetheorem,
and some such caseswill here be mentioned.
(i)
Ifm - 1 ,
so thatDy
isnon-existent,
andif,
’
we may
use Has,
The set of
equations
which contain a, y now n innuinber, is,
,
where,
After
eliminating
o ,therefore,
we can solveonly
for ... , aslinear
expressions
in thePj
and(k =1,
... ,n),
ot the rational do- maincontaining
thexl) and, separately,
the The conditionE1 ~
0is as follows :
and the coefficients
Aki
in the n functions of which coefficients there is one foreach i ,
are,(ii)
Theelementary
case of thisN1
y and therefore of its connection andinvariance, is,
Here
E" =1 ,
y and the set ofequations,
obtainedby
elimination of a , 7is,
From these
equations
therespective
values ofQ, ,
..., which the methoddetermines,
are evident. In thisinstance,
(iii)
In theproblem
ofH2,
whereZ~=0 ~
andH2
isdegenerate,
as in theexample,
the
defining
relation of theconnection, .g2 _-_ 0, presents
an alternative.Either there is
elementary
connection in thevicinity of
X2 ,x3)
orthe vector is zero. But in the contact
-relation,
2. Annali della Sauoda Norm, Sup. - Pisa.
U will not transform the two factors of
H2 ,
one into the other. Hence(15)
asserts
that
preserveselementary
contact and leavesinvariant,
both. This willparticularize U
some, but the idea can be geller-alized
forquantics,
which aredegenerate.
To show that the transfor- mation will be both existent andparticularized
we assnmed in theirgeneral
linearform, they being
not linearusually,
and assumed both of the factors ofH2 ~
yabove,
invariant. It was found that( U~
is thengenerated by
the
following
transformation:,
_
Rio-Mathematics
The influence of the
physical
environment on the variation and evolu-. tion of
biological organisms
has been studied muctl more than the influence of the mathematical environment has. Within naturallimitations, however,
mathematical
requirements
areexacting.
This is becausebiological
charac-ters can be
given
anexpressive graphical representation
and thus becomethe basis of a mathematical
system.
Also abiological organism, plant
oranimal,
is a. vehicle for themanipulation
of energy.Let T
represent
thefamily
tree of anorganism
of doubleparentage, b being
theparents
of a;c’,
c thoseof b’ , et
cetera.=
A line drawn from a to include one
primed (male)
letter from eachgeneration
is a line ofheredity. Drop
allprimes
thereonand
a female line isrepresented. Any specimen
inT, represented by
aj of a line]
can bedescribed
approximately by
a finite number of characters which are measurenumbers of its
respective parts,
such as the volume of an eye, or the ten-sile power of a
biceps
inuscle. Togive
a character agraphical representa-
_tion,
supposeI and let aj be described
by
an ordered setCj
ofcharacters,.
_Fixing
attention upon one, as thefirst,
of thexji,
we cansay that,
for anyvalue of the
age-variable t ,
from the time of the appearance of thepart
inthe
embryo
to thetime
of the demise of theorganism,
the characters x2~ , ... , will have theexplicit values, respectively,
of the numbers in theset
Kt :
-°
,
Regarding
aspolar coordinates expressed by
convenientunits,
t
being
theuniformly varying time,
the successive values of willplot
into acurve kj
whichrepresents
the continuous variation ofduring
‘an interval
(t i ~ ~ i2).
Likewise the values willgive
a curvek¡+1
which show some variation y and
.~~
willgive
a field ~’ of ncurves of this first character There will be ’In such
fields,
one for each(i = 1 ~... ~ 1n),
inOJ. (See
inFig. 1).
Whatever the
organism
thecharacter-curve kj
will be of aspiral form, coming
outward from near theorigin
andending
in asegment nearly
circu-lar. This is because the
part
measuredby
the character is small in the em-bryo,
and remainsnearly
constant inmagnitude during
theorganism’s
oldage. There is a
comparatively
small class ofexceptions
in which the char- acter-curve isapproximately
circularthroughout,
anexample being
the curveof the blood
temperature,
in man.A variation from, a
segment
in the field F can beexpressed by
a trans-formation like s in
(9), which,
witho ()
p(r)
u, vproperly chosen,
willcarry a
segment of 15;
into acorresponding segment
ofk;+i .
The variablesare here written as
(’J’, g)
instead oft).
The numerical infinitesimalsI
willnecessarily
be small in such transformations ofbiological
cur-ves.
Passing
on to asegment
ofkj+2 ~
from will mean that s must ~be combined with a like
transformation,
,.. ,, . , t ,
Geometric considerations show that all of the increments
8p 8h
will be atleast as small
numerically (7)
. If there should b~e a mutation in the line.Lz affecting
the character underconsideration,
thismight
not betrue of
8g ~ 8h but,
in the case of amutation,
we canbegin Li
with the mu-tant ap,
(DE VRIES).
The
product
ss’ is as follows:Since, however,
the inverse of sis ,in is) ,
andand u1 J o
(g)
= Vi4’ p (r)
=0,
theproduct
issymbolized by
a of(9), est,
Theorem. The
of
thefield
F areby
the groupIs) ,
which isfitted
to thefield,
not vice versa, whiclc thus beco1nes tlreexpression of
the va1’iatioll. 1Since we have fitted the group to the
field,
the values of the parame- ters u, v in(8)
have beennumerically
deterlnined.. Since theequation (10), viz.,
has two
independent coefficients,
one couldbegin
thestudy
of variationsof an
organism
of a definitespecies by choosing
twopoints (g , ~~)
on oneof the
organism’s character-curves,
idemest,
twopoints corresponding,
re-spectively,
to twoearly
ages of theorganism
inLi
andsolving
forThis will determine
lej
within a finiteregion
delimitedaccording
toa relation
«Pt
99f!J2
with q;1’ q;2determined,
butevidently,
since thein
(s)
have beendetermined,
thesymbol (11) represents
asub-group
.
of
(s) only
if 8(u1,
-aJ u1)
amounts to a choice from among the s(u , v) b3
of
(8) .
A certain
geometric advantage
results from a construction in three di- mensions based on theseries kj , kj+l ,
... Let asegment
ofkj+ 1
be drawn(7) GLENN, Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, S. II, vol. 2, 1933, p. 297.
in the
(x, y) plane
and acorresponding segment
oflcj (in position)
in the(x , x) plane.
Theright cylinders
erected on these curves asbases,
elementsparallel
,Figure 1
to the z and y axes,
respectively,
intersect in a twisted Next let be drawn in the(x, z) plane
andkj+2 in the~ (x ~ y) plane.
Thecorresponding cylinders
intersect in a space-curve Furtherrepetitions give
a fieldF1
of which F is theorthogonal projection. Since kj
isprojected
into
kj+l through the OJ
is an abstract form of -the influence of the se-cond
parent
in the process. It is known(MENDEL)
that a unitcharacter,
atleast, produces
its succession inLi
without muchrecognizable
influenceintervening
from other characters.In
polar
coordinates a transformation that takes asegment
ofej
into acorresponding segment
of cj+l isU, (u,
v ,w)
of(5), q; being
the time andu 7 v 7 w
being determined,
and we have seen that c~+~ ~ under( Ui~ ~
islikely
to fall into coincidence with any one of many invariant curves in space, the- transformations
(variations) being,
at the sametime, captured by
soinesubgroup
ofStabilization
A character of an
organism
becomes stabilized when its variationsthrough Li
cause its curve to converge to coincidence with an invariantcurve. Thus the curve becomes invariable in its line
.L~ .
Its transformations may escape from thecorresponding subgroup (s1#
whenhybridization produ-
ces i sufficient mutation. Stabilizations difficult for the
organism
to over-come have occurred among both
plants
and animals. Asexamples;
the com-mon gray
squirrel,
as known since1492,
seems to be apretty
stable organ- ism. Other cases are; the white Embden goose themorning glory
vine(Ipomaea purpurea),
and various animalsrepresented
in the Swiss Jurassic fossil bedsAll of these
organisms
have aperiod
ofrapid growth. Correspondingly
if an invariant curve in the
plane (m , r)
is directedapproximately
towardthe
origin, through
a considerablesegment
of itslength,
a curvekj ~ coming,
in y into coincidence with
,this segment
as aninvariant,
will have a pe- riod ofrapid growth.
Thus there is a connection between stabilization andrapidity
ofgrowth (8).
’We would
expect
that somecharacter-curves, varying throngh Li ,
wouldget through
the maze of invariant curves withoutfalling
into coincidence with any. This couldproduce
unevenevolution,
seen, infact,
in thegiraffe;
the horn-bill
(hydrocorttx planicornis),
and toncall(rhamphastos a1’iel),
amongbirds;
and in the fennec fox(canis zerda)?
which has ears which are enor- mous incomparison
with the rest of the animal.Lamarck’s
first lawWe consider the case of an
organism
in a definite line ofheredity,
whose characters which are essential to the process of evolution
by
natural selection do not become stabilized. For thisspecies
we prove LAMARCK’S firstlaw,
idemest,
thefollowing:
by
its propercontinually
tends to increase the sizeof
tlaetypical organism of
anyspecies,
andof
itsparts,
«up to a limit that itbrings
about».We first state
formally
asystem
ofhypotheses.
(i)
Theequation (10),
inpolar coordinates, particularized
asexplained
above for a
specific kj ,
we dividethrough by
thenumerically larger
of thetwo The result
is,
(8) To define what is to be meant by rapid
growth
we take, for the rate of growth,thc time (q) rate ~! of ohange of the volnme V of the organism or correlation of parts.
Then ~= g (g~), J = c~ The average rate
~1~
through a time-interval, is the vol-ume at the close, ~in cubic inches), minns the volume at the beginning, divided by the time (in months). When the growth is rapid: Grass hopper, medium ,speoimen, one day
to 3
months AR = .
041; Cleomo plant, 4 mo. to 5nio., AR =
4.8 ; Goose, 5 days to 3 mo.,AR= 102 ;
Fossils in the Jurassic, (information inconclusive); Elephant, embryo to 25 yrs.,AR
= 952.where either a is
-~-1
andI b I
a properfraction,
or a is apositive
properfraction
and
_.
(ii)
If o does not vanish forthe g
of anypoint
within the openplane, region
I boundedlaterally by
then there is neither any invariantpoint
of s , nor any intersection of any two non-in-variant kj
withiu I.The latter conclusion follows because if
two lcj
intersect in I and if wetransform one curve into the other
by
an s, 7 theintersection going
intoa
point innnitesimally
near on the latter curve, determines an invariantsegment
on a non-invariant curve;invariant, est,
under thesub-group
which consists of the
simple
powers of s. ,(iii)
If o is a rootofp(~)==0~
transformation s , in7y
that involvesp (~O) ~ gives
apoint
the same distance O from theorigin.
The circle is not excluded as apossible
but it is invariant.(iiiz) By hypothesis,
arcs of character-curves in I are arcs ofvirility
ofthe
organism.
°If now we express each
integral
in(17)
inpolynomial form,
for the in- tervalC (p"),
theequation of 15;
in Ibecome.s..
abbreviated as, .
Hence,
both
zero,’ and,
Here ri
is apositive
rootof g
=0;
99,being assigned
in(99’ 99 ~") ~
and
(r, ,
are connectedthrough s
with(r, ~) . The u~, ~ vh
arepositive
or
negative
infinitesimals each at least as smallnumerically
as the corre-sponding Ug, Vh
of si .Since no
two kj
intersect inI,
bothlip (r), 1/0
will bepositive
functions in I. Hence in it increase as their
respective variables
increase. If we choose the unit of
angle
so n(~) ,
as 99increases,
variesby
a
numerically
smaller amount than thecorresponding
variation of m(r) , then 9 (r)
will increase as r increases in thevicinity
of any r,on kj
inI,
and decrease as r
decreases, g (r) being, therefore, always
anincreasing
func-tion of r
(9).
A decrease in r over a finite succession of
arcs kj
inI,
means reces-sive
evolution,
andatrophy
if continuedindefinitely.
We exclude the pos-sibility
ofatrophy, by hypothesis.
The
following assumption
appears to be aparticularization
at thisstage
of the
argument.
We assume that all sumsVi , (i =1, 2 ,
... , inde-finitely),
arenegative,
idemest,
that the infinitesimals Vk and thereforeuk , vk
are such as tomake Ui -~- Vi
inegative. Since g (r)
is anincreasing function,
theaddition,
in(19),
ofU; + Vi
to the absolute termof g (r) - 0 ,
has this effect: It increases root r in the
vicinity (q/
99~") ,
from r,outward,
over the succession ofinfinitesimally spaced
arcsgiven by Si 9 (r) , (i =1, 2 , ...).
The succession of
spirals kj
inLi,
under thehypotheses,
are thereforeexpanding
as the time tincreases, (with j).
’
As an additional
hypothesis,
we now make use of the fact of evolutionby
natural selection. Thepart
with thecharacter-curve kj
isby assumption
relevant in the
organism’s struggle
for existence. Hence there is a minimumposition
for thecurve kj
in the area delimitedby (g’
cp99")
and thecorresponding
radii.If kj
goes nearer to theorigin
than this absolute min-imal, kao ,
Idoes,
theorganism’s corresponding part
becomes to weak forsurvival.
Then,
there is also a series of relative minimals in the field F. IfF,
extended from
kao,
notinclusive, as j
is increasedindefinitely
butfinitely,
is
examined,
one curve will be found to have reached aposition
inthe aforesaid area, nearer to the
origin
thau the rest which liebeyond kao chronologically.
Next consider theportion
of Flying beyond
con-tains a minimal The process can be
repeated indefinitely,
andgives
us a sequence of
infinitesimally spaced
minimalschronologically
orderedin
F,
each minimallying
outside of itschronological predecessor.
This se-quence may be written as: