ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect
International Journal of Pharmaceutics
j ou rn a l h o m e pag e :w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / i j p h a r m
Administration-dependent efficacy of ferrociphenol lipid nanocapsules for the treatment of intracranial 9L rat gliosarcoma
Ngoc Trinh Huynh
a,b, Catherine Passirani
a,b,∗, Emilie Allard-Vannier
a,b, Laurent Lemaire
a,b, Jerome Roux
c, Emmanuel Garcion
a,b, Anne Vessieres
d, Jean-Pierre Benoit
a,baLUNAMUniversité,IngénieriedelaVectorisationParticulaire,F-49933Angers,France
bINSERMU646,F-49933Angers,France
cServiceCommund’AnimalerieHospitalo-Universitaire(SCAHU),AngersF-49100,France
dCNRS,UMR7223,EcoleNationaleSupérieuredeChimiedeParis,F-75231,France
a r t i c l e i n f o
Articlehistory:
Received11February2011 Receivedinrevisedform8April2011 Accepted15April2011
Available online 21 April 2011
Keywords:
Braintumour DSPE-mPEG2000
Convection-enhanceddelivery(CED) Intra-carotidinjection
PEGylatednanoparticles
a b s t r a c t
Theanti-tumoureffectofferrociphenol(FcdiOH)-loadedlipidnanocapsules(LNCs),withorwithouta DSPE-mPEG2000coating,wasevaluatedonanorthotopicgliosarcomamodelafteradministrationby convection-enhanceddelivery(CED)techniqueorbyintra-carotidinjection.Notoxicitywasobserved byMRI norby MRS in healthyrats receiving a CEDinjection ofFcdiOH-LNCs (60L, 0.36mg of FcdiOH/rat)whenthepHandosmolarity hadbeenadjustedtophysiologicalvaluespriortoinjec- tion.Atthisdose,thetreatmentbyCEDwithFcdiOH-LNCssignificantlyincreasedthesurvivaltimeof tumour-bearingratsincomparisonwithanuntreatedgroup(28.5daysvs25days,P=0.0009)whereas DSPE-mPEG2000–FcdiOH-LNCsdidnotexhibitanyefficacywithamediansurvivaltimeof24days.
Afterintra-carotidinjection(400L,2.4mgofFcdiOH/rat),hyperosmolarDSPE-mPEG2000–FcdiOH- LNCsmarkedlyincreasedthemediansurvivaltime(upto30days,P=0.0008)ascomparedtothecontrol (20%).Thiswasstrengthenedbytheirevidencedaccumulationinthetumourzoneandbythemeasure ofthefluorescentbrainsurfaceobtainedonbrainslidesfortheseDiI-labelledLNCs,being3-foldhigher thanforthecontrol.Theseresultsdemonstratedthat,dependingupontheadministrationrouteused, thecharacteristicsofLNCsuspensionshadtobecarefullyadapted.
© 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Theincidencerateofbraintumourshasincreasedremarkably and tended to be higher in developed, industrialised countries (Parkinet al.,2005).Amongthevarioustypesof braintumour, glioblastomasrepresentthemostprevalentandmalignantgliomas inadults(gradeIVclassifiedbytheWorldHealthOrganization– WHO)(Louisetal.,2007).Inspiteofnumerous,notableadvances indiagnosistechniquesandalsoinmultimodaltherapyregimes includingsurgicalresectionfollowedbyradiotherapyandadjuvant chemotherapy(Stuppetal.,2005),thesurvivalprognosisalways remains unfavourable,mostpatientsdying within2 yearsafter diagnosis(GrossmanandBatara,2004).Intermsofchemotherapy, theeffortindrugdiscoveryanddevelopmenthasbeenlimiteddue totheobstacleoftheblood–brainbarrier(BBB)whichpreventsthe deliveryofdrugstothecentralnervoussystem(CNS)bymeansof asystemicinjection(Pardridge,2005;Segal,2000).
∗Correspondingauthorat:LUNAMUniversité,IngénieriedelaVectorisationPar- ticulaire,F-49933Angers,France.Tel.:+33244688534;fax:+33244688546.
E-mailaddress:catherine.passirani@univ-angers.fr(C.Passirani).
Overthelastdecades,thetechniqueofdrugdeliverytothebrain byconvection-enhanceddelivery(CED)hasprovidedaninterest- ingtool ofadministrationforbraincancerchemotherapy(Bobo etal.,1994).Thistechniqueconsistsinthecontinuousinjection ofatherapeuticfluidunderpositivepressure.CEDinjectionallows alocaladministrationoflargedosesofinfusatewhichismainly distributedwithintheinterstitialspacesoftissuesbyagradient ofpressurethatenhancesconstitutiveintracellularmediumcon- vection(Allardetal.,2009b).Indeed,byusinglipidnanocapsules (LNCs)whicharecharacterisedbyahybridstructurebetweenpoly- mernanocapsulesandliposomes(Huynhetal.,2009),aprevious study demonstrated the wide distribution areathroughout the injectedhemisphere(Vinchon-Petitetal.,2010).Homogeneityof NileRed-labelledLNCsaroundtheinjectionsitewasobservedfor 24hfollowingaCEDinjectionintothebrainofhealthyrats.More- over,on6-day-old9Ltumour-bearingrats,NileRed-labelledLNCs fullycoveredthetumourzoneandwerefoundinthecytoplasmof tumourcells.
Recently,anewseriesoforganometallictamoxifenderivatives havebeendevelopedbyaddingapotentiallycytostaticferrocene moietytothetamoxifenskeleton(Jaouenetal.,2000a;Topetal., 2003;Vessieresetal.,2005).Themechanismoftheseferrocene 0378-5173/$–seefrontmatter© 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.04.037
derivativesisbelievedtoactasanintramolecularcatalystforthe oxidationofthephenolgroupinmildconditions,leadingtothe productionofquinonemethideswhicharestronglytoxic(Hillard et al., 2005). These last compounds may interact with macro- moleculessuchasglutathione,DNAandcertainproteinsleading tothetumour cell’sdeathbyaccelerated senescence(Vessieres etal.,2005).Amongthesederivatives,thecompound2-ferrocenyl- 1,1-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)-but-1-ene,orferrociphenolcompound (FcdiOH)hasprovedinvitrotobeaneffectivecytostaticcompound (IC50=0.7MonMCF-7hormone-dependentand IC50=0.44M onMDA-MB231hormone-independent breast cancercelllines) (Vessieresetal.,2005).FcdiOHloadedintotheoilycoreofLNCs (FcdiOH-LNCs)athighconcentrations(6.5mg/g,2%driedweight) showed remarkable antitumour effects in a subcutaneous, 9L gliosarcoma model after an intra-tumoural injection (Allard et al.,2008b).FcdiOH-LNCsimprovedthesurvivaltimeofratsinan intracraniallyimplanted9Lgliosarcomamodelwhenadministered byCEDinadose-dependentmanner(Allardetal.,2009a).More- over,asynergisticeffectwasalsoobservedbetweenchemotherapy withFcdiOH-LNCs and external irradiationrevealing theradio- sensitive properties of FcdiOH (Allard et al., 2010). However, someneuronalsideeffects intheinjectedhemisphereobserved in long-term survivors receiving the highest LNC suspension concentrationhavebeenreportedpreviously(Allardetal.,2008a).
ThisstudyaimedatevaluatingtheimpactofFcdiOH-LNCson the rat brain after CED administration by magnetic resonance imagingbeforeandafter someadjustments assessedasneeded foreffectiveandsafeadministration.Furthermore,theantitumour efficacyof thesemodified FcdiOH-LNCsdelivered byCED tech- niqueonan intracranial gliosarcoma rat model wasevaluated.
Asanalternativerouteofdrugadministrationtothebrain(Alam etal.,2010), intra-carotidinjectionofFcdiOH-LNCsthroughthe carotidarterywasinvestigatedinordertoincreasethevolumeof drugadministered.Moreover,theefficacyofFcdiOH-LNCscoated withlongerchainsofpolyethyleneglycol(PEG)wasalsoassessed inordertotesttheeffectoflong-circulatingpropertiesbroughtby thispolymer(Morilleetal.,2010).
2. Materialsandmethods
2.1. Materials
Ferrociphenol, abbreviated as FcdiOH, was prepared by a McMurrycouplingreaction(Jaouenetal.,2000b).Thelipophilic Labrafac® CC (caprylic-capric acid triglycerides) was pur- chased from Gattefosse S.A. (Saint-Priest, France). Lipoïd® S75-3 (soybean lecithin at 69% of phosphatidylcholine) came from Lipoïd Gmbh (Ludwigshafen, Germany); Solutol® HS15 (a mixture of free polyethylene glycol 660 and polyethy- lene glycol 660 hydroxystearate) from BASF (Ludwigshafen, Germany) and NaCl fromProlabo (Fontenay-sous-bois, France).
Deionisedwaterwasacquiredfroma Milli-Qplussystem(Mil- lipore, Paris, France) and sterile water from Cooper (Melun, France). 1,2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-ethanolamine-N- [methoxy-(polyethyleneglycol)-2000] (DSPE-mPEG2000)(mean molecularweight(MMW)=2805g/mol)waskindlyprovided by AvantiPolarLipids (Alabaster,USA).1,10-Dioctadecyl-3,3,30,30- tetramethylindocarbocyanineperchlorate(DiI)wasobtainedfrom Introgen(Cergy,Pontoise,France).
2.2. PreparationoftheLNCs 2.2.1. Anticanceragent-loadedLNCs
In this study, fifty-nanometer diameter LNCs, whose for- mulation is based on the phase-inversion phenomenon of a
microemulsion,werepreparedinconformitywiththedescribed procedure(Heurtaultetal.,2002).Briefly,thepreparationprocess involved2 steps.StepIconsistedof mixingallthecomponents (Solutol® HS15 (17% w/w),Lipoid® (1.5%w/w), Labrafac® (20%
w/w),NaCl(1.75%w/w)andwater(59.75%w/w))undermagnetic stirringandheatingfromroomtemperatureto85◦C.Threecycles ofprogressivecoolingandheatingbetween85and60◦Cwerethen carriedout.StepIIwasanirreversibleshockinducedbysudden dilutionwithcoldwater(70%v/v)tothemixtureat70–72◦C.Slow magneticstirringwasthenappliedtothesuspensionfor5min.
ToloadtheanticanceragenttotheoilycoreofLNCs,FcdiOHwas firstlydissolvedinLabrafac®underultrasoundat4%(w/w)for1.5h andtheresultinglipophilicphasewasafterwardsmixedwithother componentsasdescribedabove.Moreover,inthisstudy,inorderto increasetheconcentrationofthedruginthefinalLNCsuspension, thecoldwateraddedtothemixtureatthestepIIwasdecreased from70%(v/v)forconventionalformulations(111mgofparticles pergramofsuspension)to28.5%(v/v)fortheconcentratedones (280mg/g).FinalLNCsuspensionswerefilteredthroughaMinisart 0.2mfilter(Sartorius)inordertoeliminatesomeunincorporated products.
2.2.2. FluorescentLNCs
To visualise the LNCs on the brain slides, LNCs were labelledwithDiI(emissionwavelength=549nm;excitationwave- length=565nm).TheformulationoffluorescentLNCswassimilar tothatdescribedpreviously(Garcionetal.,2006).Briefly,DiIwas dissolvedin acetoneat3mg/mland theresultingsolution was incorporatedintheLabrafac®atproportionof1:30(v/v).Acetone solventwasthenevaporatedbeforemixingwithothercomponents toformulatefluorescentLNCs.
2.2.3. Surface-modifiedLNCs
DSPE-mPEG2000wasincorporatedtothesurfaceofLNCsatthe concentrationof10mMbythepost-insertiontechniquepreviously described(Morilleetal.,2010).Briefly,preformedLNCsuspensions andDSPE-mPEG2000micelleswereco-incubatedfor2hat60◦C.
Themixturewasvortexedevery15minandthenquenchedinan icebathfor1min.
2.2.4. AdjustmentofthepHandosmolarityoftheLNC suspensions
IncertainexperimentalproceduresofCEDinjection,thecon- centratedLNCsuspensions(referredtoascrudesuspensions)were passedthroughaPD-10sephadexcolumn(AmershamBiosciences Europe,Orsay,France) andthen concentratedbyultra-filtration withMilliporeAmicon100kDacentrifugalfilterdevice(Millipore, St.Quentin-Yvelines,France).Theosmolarityoftheresultingsus- pensionswasthenadjustedbyaddinga5Msalinesolution.Finally, theaciditywasneutralisedbya0.1NNaOHsolutioninorderto obtainadjustedLNCs.
2.3. CharacterisationofLNCs
2.3.1. Meanparticlesizeandzetapotential
TheLNCswerediluted1:100(v/v)indeionisedwaterandthe measurementswereperformedat25◦C.TheLNCswereanalysed intriplicatefortheirmeanparticlediameter,polydispersityindex (PdI)andsurfacechargeusingaMalvernZetasizer®(NanoSerie DTS1060,MalvernInstrumentsS.A.,Worcestershire,UK).
2.3.2. OsmolarityandpHmeasurement
Themeasurement ofthepHand osmolarityoftheLNC sus- pensions was performed by using a Consort C561 pH meter
fromAvantec(FisherBioblock,Scientific)and5520Vaprovapour osmometerfromWescor(Logan,Utah,USA),respectively.
2.4. Invivostudies 2.4.1. Animals
SyngeneicFischerF344femalerats,weighing160–180gwere obtained from Charles River Laboratories France (L’Arbresle, France).Allexperimentswereperformedon10-to11-week-old femaleFisherrats.Animalcarewascarriedoutinstrictaccordance withFrenchMinistryofAgricultureregulations.
2.4.2. Tumourcellculture
Rat9LgliosarcomacellswereobtainedfromtheEuropeanCol- lection of Cell Culture (Salisbury, UK, No. 94110705). The cells wereculturedat37◦Cinahumidifiedatmospherecontaining5%
CO2inDulbecco’smodifiedEagle’smedium(DMEM)withglucose andl-glutamine(BioWhittaker,Verviers,Belgium)suppliedwith 10%foetalcalfserum(FCS)(BioWhittaker)and1%antibioticand antimycoticsolution(Sigma,Saint-QuentinFallavier,France).
2.4.3. Intra-cranialgliosarcomamodel
On the day of implantation, a cultured tumour monolayer was detached by using a mixture of trypsin–ethylene diamine tetraaceticacid,then,washedtwicewithEagle’sminimalessen- tial medium (EMEM) without FCS and antibiotics. Cells were counted,andre-suspendedinEMEMtothefinalconcentrationof 1059Lcells/mlforimplantation.
Theanimalswereanaesthetisedbyintra-peritonealinjectionof 1.0ml/kgofa1:1mixtureofketamine(100mg/ml)(Clorketam®, Vétoquinol, Lure, France) and xylazine (20mg/ml) (Rompun®, Bayer,Puteaux,France).Theincisionsitewasshavedandthehead wasimmobilisedinastereotaxicframe(LabStandardStereotaxic;
Stoelting,Chicago,IL).A middlescalp incisionwasmadeand a burrholewasdrilledintotheskullusingasmalldentaldrill.The cannulacoordinateswere1mmposteriorfromthebregma,3mm lateralfromthesagittalsuture,and5mmbelowthedura(with theincisorbarsetat0mm).The32Gneedle(Hamilton®),fittedto a10lsyringe(Hamilton®glasssyringe700seriesRN),wasleft inplacefor5minandthen10lof103 9Lcellsuspensionwere injectedstereotaxicallyintotherightratstriatumataflowrateof 2l/min.Theneedlewasleftinplacefor5additionalminutesto avoidexpulsionofthesuspensionfromthebrainduringremovalof thesyringe,whichwaswithdrawnveryslowly(0.5mm/min).The scalpincisionwasthenclosedbyusingasilksuture(Perma-Hand Seide3-0,Ethicon).
OnDay6after9Lcellimplantation,ratswereinjectedbymeans ofCEDorintra-carotidinjectionofdifferentLNCformulations.
2.4.4. CEDprocedure
Tumour-bearing-ratswereanaesthetisedbyanintra-peritoneal injectionof1.5ml/kgofa2:1mixtureofketamineandxylazine.
Thesameprocedureofinjectionasdescribedfor cellimplanta- tionwasapplied.The 32Gneedle (Hamilton®)fitted toa 10l Hamilton®syringewasplacedinthesamecoordinates.Thissyringe wasconnectedtoa100lHamiltonsyringe22G(HarvardAppa- ratus,LesUlis,France)containingtheproductthroughacannula (CoExTMPE/PVCtubing,Harvardapparatus,LesUlis,France).Sixty microlitres(60l)ofLNCsuspensionwereinjectedbyCEDwhich wasperformedwithapumpPHD2000infusion(HarvardAppara- tus,LesUlis,France)bycontrollinga0.5l/minratefor2h.The needlewasleftinplacefor5additionalminutestoavoidexpulsion ofthesuspensionfromthebrainduringremovalofthesyringe, whichwaswithdrawnveryslowly(0.5mm/min).
2.4.5. Intra-carotidinjection
Tumour-bearing-ratswereanaesthetisedbyanintra-peritoneal injectionof1.0–1.5ml/kgofa1:1solutionofketamine(100mg/ml) (Clorketam®, Vétoquinol,Lure, France) and xylazine(20mg/ml) (Rompun®,Bayer, Puteaux, France). The middle neck skin was shavedandincised.Therightcommoncarotid(thesamesideof9L cellimplantation)wasexposedandligated.APE10polyethylene catheter(BDIntramedicTMPolyethyleneTubing,BectonDickinson, USA)wasinsertedretrogradelythroughasmallarteriotomy.Four hundredmicrolitresofLNCsuspensionboluswereinjectedininto eachrat.Thecatheterwasthenremovedandthecarotidarterywas ligated.
2.4.6. Sideeffectmonitoringbymagneticresonanceimagingand
1H-magneticresonancespectroscopy
SixtymicrolitresofFcdiOH-LNCswereadministeredbyCED(as describedinSection2.4.4)tohealthyratsatthesamecoordinates oftumourimplantation.Magneticresonanceimaging(MRI)and1H magneticresonancespectroscopy(MRS)weretakenonDays14,42, 70andDay100afterCEDinjection,tomonitorsideeffectsofcrude suspensionandadjustedsuspensionofFcdiOH-LNCswithphysio- logicalosmolarityandpHvalues.MRIwasperformedonaBruker AvanceDRX300equippedwitha verticalsuperwide-bore mag- netoperatingat7T.RapidqualitativeT2-weightedimageswere obtained using rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) sequence (TR=2000ms; meanecho time (TE)=31.7ms;
RAREfactor=8;FOV=3cm×3cm;matrix128×128;ninecontigu- ous slicesof 1mm, eightacquisitions). 1H MRSwas performed usingaPRESSsequencewithwatersuppressionunderthefollow- ingparameters:TR/TE=1500/11ms; NEX=128;voxel size27l (3mm×3mm×3mm), as already determined (Lemaire et al., 1999).
2.4.7. VisualisationoffluorescentLNCsinratbrain
ForthepurposeoftrackingtheinjectedLNCs,theywereloaded with a fluorescent agent (DiI) instead of an anticancer agent (FcdiOH). DiI-LNCs or DSPE-mPEG2000–DiI-LNCs (400l) were administeredintotumour-bearingratsthroughtherightcommon carotidartery.Untreatedtumour-bearingratsservedasthecon- trolgroup.Theratswereeuthanised24hafterinjectioninaCO2 chamber.Thebrainwasremovedandthensnap-frozeninliquid nitrogen-chilledisopentaneandstoredat−80◦C.Coronalcryosec- tions(14m)throughoutthetumourzonewereperformedand recoveredonslides.Theslideswerekeptatleast24hat−20◦C beforebeingprocessed.
Frozensectionsweredefrostedatroomtemperatureandrehy- dratedinDulbecco’sphosphate-bufferedsaline(DPBS).Sections werefixedin4%paraformaldehydeandwashedwithDPBS.Slides wereobservedunderanAxioskop-2Zeissfluorescentmicroscope (LePeck,France)usinga20×objective.Theacquiredimageswere analysedbymeasuringthefluorescentsurfaceareaonthebrain tissueslidesviaintegratedmorphometryanalysisofaninclusive thresholdimagebyuseoftheMetamorph®software(RoperSci- entific,Evry,France). Inorder tobettervisualise thenucleusof thetumourcells,somesectionswerefurtherstainedwith1/1000 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole(DAPI)inDPBSfor10minandthen washedwithDPBSbeforemounting.
2.4.8. Efficacystudy
The treatment was assessed by CED administration (60l, 0.36mgofFcdiOH/rat),orintra-carotidinjection(400l,2.4mgof FcdiOH/rat)withFcdiOH-LNCsorDSPE-mPEG2000–FcdiOH-LNCs.
ForCEDinjection,theosmolarityandpHoftheLNCsuspensions wereadjustedtophysiologicalvalueswhereasthecrudesuspen- sionswereusedforintra-carotidinjection.Theuntreatedcontrol groupdidnotreceiveanytreatment.Animalswereweighedevery
6days.TheanimalsweresacrificedinaCO2chamberwhenthey lost20%ofbodyweightand/orassoonastheypresentedseizure, ahunchedposture,orhaemorrhagingaroundtheeyes,mouthand nose.Thedeathwasrecordedasifithadoccurredonthenextday ofsacrificeandwasrepresentedasthesurvivaltimeofanimalson theKaplan–Meiercurves.
Thestatisticalanalysiswasestimatedfromthelog-ranktest (Mantel-CoxTest)byusing StatView software,version5.0 (SAS instituteInc.).ThelevelofsignificancewassetatP<0.05.Thediffer- enttreatmentgroupswerecomparedintermsofmedianandmean survivaltime(days).Thepercentageofincreaseinsurvival time (%IST)wasdeterminedrelativetothemedianandmeansurvival timesoftheuntreatedcontrolgroupaspresentedinthefollowing equation:
% IST= [MedianT(MeanT)−MedianC(MeanC)]
MedianC(MeanC)
whereMedianT/MeanTwasthemedian/meanofsurvivaltimeof treatedgroupwhileMedianC/MeanCwasthemedian/meanofsur- vivaltimeofcontrolgroup.
3. Resultsanddiscussion
3.1. PhysicochemicalpropertiesofLNCsuspensions
ThephysicochemicalpropertiesofdifferenttypesofLNCsare presented in Table 1. All types of LNCs had theiraverage size ranging44–53nmwithvery narrowsizedispersion(PdI<0.08).
LNCswerecharacterisedbyaslightlynegativezetapotential(from
−3to−5mV),exceptforDSPE-mPEG2000–FcdiOH-LNCsthatpre- senteda zetapotentialofbout -22mVduetotheformation of dipolesbetweenPEGmoleculesandwater,asalready described (Vonarbourgetal.,2005).TheencapsulationofFcdiOHdidnotaffect theaverageparticlesizeandzetapotentialaspreviouslyreported (Allardetal.,2008b).ThisdenotedefficientencapsulationofFcdiOH intheoilycoreofLNCs.
Thereduction of cold water added tothe final temperature cycleallowedformulating FcdiOH-LNCsat a highdrugconcen- tration(6.5mgofFcdiOHpergofLNCsuspension,corresponding to2%w/wdryweight).Thismodificationdidnotaltertheparti- clesizenorthezetapotentialofresultingLNCscomparedtothe conventionalones(Table1).However,concentrated blankLNCs as wellas FcdiOH-LNCs werehyperosmolar (780.25±7.80 and 773.50±7.05mmol/kg,respectively)whereasconventionalblank LNCswerehypoosmolar(227.50±2.12mmol/kg).Withrespectto thesuspensionacidity,allLNCsuspensionspresentedanacidpH level (pH=5.3–5.7) and there was no differencebetween con- ventionalformulationsandconcentratedones.Afteradjustments concerningosmolarityandpH,measurementofparticlesizeand zetapotentialshowednochangesintheseparameters(datanot shown).
3.2. DrugdeliverybymeansoftheCEDtechnique
3.2.1. Monitoringofsideeffectsbymagneticresonanceimaging Inapreviousstudyreportingthetreatmentof9Lgliosarcomain ratsbyCEDinjectionofaconcentratedsuspensionof188Re-loaded LNCs, the T2-weighted images taken from long-term survivors showed a hyper-intense signal, which wasmainly localised in thestriatumandpersisteduntilDay140ofexperiments(Allard etal.,2008a).Moreover,1H MRSshoweda decreaseinthesig- nalintensityforN-acetylaspartate(NAA)andcreatine(Cr).NAAis consideredasavaluablemarkerofbraininjury(Demougeotetal., 2001).AdecreaseinNAAlevelsdetectedfromMRSsuggestsneu- ronal/axonalloss,orcompromisedneuronalmetabolism(Moffett etal.,2007;Schuffetal.,2006).Theauthorspostulatedthatthis
lesionwasrelatedtointernalradiationinjury.Unfortunately,these sideeffectswerealsoobservedinalong-termsurvivorratthatwas treatedwithconcentratedsuspensionsofFcdiOH-LNCsinaprevi- ousstudyconcerningtumour-bearingrats(unpublisheddata).
Therefore,thefirstsetofexperimentsinthepresentstudywas toinvestigatewhethercrude FcdiOH-LNCsaltered theneuronal metabolismandcausedthesideeffectsonhealthyratsafteraCED administration.T2-weightedimagesshowedthattheinjectionof suchasuspensioncausedalesion,highlightedbyahyper-intense signalregionontheinjectedhemisphere untilDay70 (Fig.1A) andcharacterisedbyasignificantdecreaseinNAAandCrinten- sityoftheinjectedhemisphereascomparedtothecontralateral hemisphereonprotonspectra(Fig.1B).Ontheotherhand,two highpeaksaround0.9–1.5ppmwereobservedfromthespectrum takenonDay14post-injection,whichprobablycorrespondedto thepeaksofLNClipids.However,thesepeaksnearlydisappeared bythefollowingreading(Day42).Thisunderlinedthemetabolism ofLNCsduring6weeksafterinjectionintothehealthyratstria- tum.Moreover,theseneuronallesionswerealsoobservedinrats receivingblankLNCswithsimilarhyper-intensesignalregionon theinjectedhemisphereonMRIand aconsiderabledecreasein NAAandCrlevelson1HMRS(figuresnotshown).Therefore,such sideeffectscouldberelatedtotheintrinsicpropertiesofLNCsus- pensions.
Indeed,administratingahyperosmoticinfusateintotheextra- cellular space produces the movement of water from the intracellularspacetotheextracellularspace,leading tocellular dehydration.Thiseffectpotentiallyinducesbraintissuedamage, resultinginneurologicaldysfunction(Petitetal.,2006;Verbalis, 2010).Amarkedcellvolumedecreasewasobservedwhenincu- bating cultured human astrocytes with hyperosmotic medium (Anderson et al., 2000). Luh et al. demonstrated that thepro- longedexposureofendothelialcells toahyperosmolarmedium (>460mOsm/L)significantlyreduceditsviabilityandfunction(Luh etal.,1996).Therefore,thesepreviouslyobservedsideeffectscould belinkedtothehyperosmolarityofcrudeLNCsuspensionwhich was2.5-foldhigherthanphysiologicalosmolarity.
Asaconsequence,forasafelocaladministration,weadjusted theirosmolarityandpHtophysiologicalconditionsasdescribed inSection2.2.4.Effectively,thisformulationdidnotdisturbthe normal condition of the brain environment since MRI showed alimited hyper-intensesignalzone ontheinjectedhemisphere (Fig.1C)associatedwithnodifferenceinNAAandCrsignalintensity between2hemisphereson1HMRS(Fig.1D).
3.2.2. EfficacyofCEDtreatment
Thesurvivaldatafromtreatedtumour-bearingratsaresum- marised inTable 2 andKaplan–Meier survival plots are shown inFig.2.Byapplyingthecriteriaforeuthanasiaofexperimental animals,ratsweresacrificedwhentheylost20%ofbodyweight associatedwithahighdegreeofdepression.Alluntreatedcontrol ratsweresacrificedfromDay22toDay26after9Lcellimplantation resultinginamedianandmeansurvivaltimeof25days.
ThetreatmentwithadjustedFcdiOH-LNCs(60l,0.36mg/rat) bymeansofCEDsignificantlyincreasedthemedianandthemean survivaltimeofanimalsascomparedtothecontrolgroup(28.5 and30days,respectively).Onthecontrary,treatmentwithDSPE- mPEG2000–FcdiOH-LNCsin thesame dosedidnotimprovethe survivalofanimalsastheirmedianremainedat24days.
ThefailureofDSPE-mPEG2000–FcdiOH-LNCstreatmentcould beexplained bytheabundantpresence of PEG,especially with thelongchainsofPEGatthenanoparticulatesurface.Indeed,PEG coatingpotentiallyinhibitstheinternalisationofdrug-loadedNPs bytumourcellsbecauseitisknowntopreventtheinteractions betweentheNPsandthetumourcellsurface(Hongetal.,1999;
Morilleetal.,2009).Moreover,themoderatedefficacyofFcdiOH
Table1
PhysicochemicalpropertiesofLNCsuspensions.
Meanparticlesize(nm) Poly-dispersityPdI Zetapotential(mV)
Conventionalformulation BlankLNCs 49.13±2.18 0.026±0.012 −3.38±0.42
Concentratedformulation BlankLNCs 49.01±2.18 0.029±0.009 −3.82±0.21
FcdiOH-LNCs 44.10±0.91 0.025±0.007 −5.05±1.61
DSPE-mPEG2000–FcdiOH-LNCs 49.08±0.15 0.080±0.006 −21.67±1.10
DiI-LNCs 49.94±0.22 0.040±0.008 −3.28±0.10
DSPE-mPEG2000–DiI-LNCs 53.22±1.40 0.041±0.009 −22.50±1.11
byCEDadministrationmightbelinkedtothedoseofdrugusedin thisstudybeingnotenoughhigh.Indeed,aspreviouslyobserved, FcdiOHexhibiteda cytostaticactivityinvivoontheintracranial 9Lgliosarcomamodelinratsinadose-dependentmanner(Allard
etal.,2009a).Inthispreviouswork,thetreatmentbyCEDofFcdiOH dissolvedinLabrafac(2.4mg/rat)atitslimitedsolubility(40mg/g) gained the median survival time up to31 days. Unfortunately, some toxic signs were observed in rats treated withdrug-free
Fig.1.RepresentativeMRIand1HMRStakenfromhealthyratsthatreceivedcrudeFcdiOH-LNCs(A,B)andadjustedFcdiOH-LNCs(C,D).CEDinjectionofcrudeFcdiOH-LNCs causedalesionontheinjectedhemisphereasseenonT2-weightedimages(A).ThelesionswerecharacterisedbyadecreaseinNAAandCrintensity(i)ascomparedto thecontralateralhemisphere(ii)thatwaspresentedbythedifferenceinsignalintensitybetween2hemipheres(iii)onthe1HMRS(B).Byadjustingtheosmolarityand pHofFcdiOH-LNCstothephysiologicalvalues,CEDinjectionofadjustedFcdiOH-LNCsshowedalimitedhyper-intensesignalontheinjectedhemisphereonT2-weighted images(C)andnodifferenceinNAAandCrintensitywasfoundin1HMRSbetweenthe2hemispheres(D).SpectratakenonDay14revealed2peaksofLNCs(circle)which disappearedonDay42.
Table2
EfficacyofFcdiOH-LNCsandDSPE-mPEG2000–FcdiOH-LNCsinanintracranial9LgliosarcomamodelinFisherrats(IST:increasedsurvivaltime).
Administrationroute(injecteddoseofFcdiOH) Treatment n Survivaltime(days) %IST
Range Median Mean±SD Median Mean
Convection-enhanceddelivery(0.36mg/rat) FcdiOH-LNCs 8 25–36 28.5 30.13±3.98 14.00 19.90
DSPE-mPEG2000–FcdiOH-LNCs 8 20–29 24 23.75±3.01 – –
Intra-carotid(2.4mg/rat) FcdiOH-LNCs 7 25–30 27 27.57±2.07 8.00 10.29
DSPE-mPEG2000–FcdiOH-LNCs 8 26–33 30 29.38±2.50 20.00 17.50
Untreatedcontrol 8 23–27 25 25.13±1.25 –
Fig.2.Kaplan–Meiersurvivalplotsfor9Lglioma-bearingratsreceivingCEDinjec- tionofDSPE-mPEG2000–FcdiOH-LNCs,FcdiOH-LNCs (60lofLNCsuspension, correspondingto0.36mgofFcdiOHperrat)atDay6aftercellimplantationand untreatedanimals.
LabrafacshowingthelimitationofclinicaltolerancetoLabrafac wheninfused alone.Thus, takingintoconsideration thebenefit ofLNCsinimprovingintracellularbioavailability(Garcionetal., 2006),theseresultsrevealthenecessityofloadingFcdiOHintothe oilycoreofLNCsandincreasingthevolumeoftheinjectionaswell.
3.3. Drugdeliverybyintra-carotidinjection
Intra-carotidadministration can beconsidered asa regional deliveryofdrugtothebrainthatleadingtoasignificantenhance- mentindrugexposureofthetumouralvasculature(Joshietal., 2008).Inthiscase,thedrugisinjecteddirectlyintothebloodartery anddirectedtowardsthebrainvasculaturebeforeenteringperiph- eraltissuesbyavoidingthefirstpassmetabolism(Alametal.,2010).
Extensivestudiescarriedoutinbothexperimentalanimalsaswell asinhumans,havedemonstratedbenefitsofintra-arterialadmin- istrationinthetreatmentofbraintumour(Chertoketal.,2010;
Figueiredoetal.,2010;Fortin etal.,2005;Fujiwaraetal.,1995;
Newton,2006;Newtonetal.,2003;SchemandKrossnes,1995).
Inordertotestthebenefitofthisadministrationroute,LNCs werelabelledwithDiIforthepurposeoftrackingtheinjectedLNCs.
Moreover,thisadministrationrouteallowedincreasingthevolume ofinjectionofLNCsfrom60lforCEDinjectionto400l.
3.4. LNCvisualisationinratbrainslices
Fluorescentsectionimagesofcontrolratsthatdidnotreceive DiI-LNCsshowedtheauto-fluorescentspotsofbraincellswhich wereconsideredasbackgroundnoise, and nofluorescence was detectedinthebraincapillarylumen(Fig.3A).24hafteradminis- trationoflabelledLNCs,includingDiI-LNCsorDSPE-PEG-DiI-LNCs bycarotidinjection,redfluorescenceofDiIwasobservedandcould beassignedwithinthebraintissue(Fig.3BandC).Especially,in thebrainsectionsofratsreceivingDSPE-mPEG2000–DiI-LNCs,the fluorescentspots werelargelyenhanced throughoutthetissues associatedwithobviousfluorescenceofcapillarylumen.Themea-
Fig.3. Sectionrepresentativeimageunderfluorescentmicroscopetakenfromthecontroltumour-bearingrat(A)andratsreceivinganintra-carotidadministrationofDiI- LNCs(B)orDSPE-mPEG2000–DiI-LNCs(C).Theblue-fluorescentDAPI(D)denotedthetumourzonewhereastheredfluorescenceofDiI(E)showedthedistributionofLNCs aroundthetumourillustratedbythemergedimage(F).
Fig.4. Semi-quantifiedpresenceofLNCs24hafteradministrationinthebrain slidesbymeasurementofDiI-fluorescentsurfaces.*indicatesthestatisticallysignif- icantdifferenceinfluorescentsurfaceuponDiI-LNCandDSPE-mPEG2000–DiI-LNC administrationfromcontrolrats.=/ indicatesthestatisticallysignificantdifference betweenDSPE-mPEG2000–DiI-LNCadministrationandDiI-LNCone.
surementsofthefluorescentsurfaceinpixelsofinclusivethreshold imagesallowedtosemi-quantifythepresenceofLNCsinthebrain slides.AspresentedinFig.4,incomparisonwiththecontrol,the fluorescentsurfacesignificantlyincreasedwithDiI-LNCadminis- trationandachievedthehighestvalueinthebrainslideforrats receivingDSPE-mPEG2000–DiI-LNCs.Indeed,thefluorescentsur- facemeasuredfromtheseslideswasabout1.75-foldhigherthan thatofDiI-LNCsandabout3-foldthanthatofcontrol.
BylabellingcellnucleiwithDAPI,thetumourwasrecognised bybluefluorescence (Fig.3D)whereas ofDiI-labelled nanopar- ticles was detected by red fluorescence (Fig. 3E). The merged imageshowedtheaccumulationofnanoparticlessurroundingthe tumourzone(Fig.3F).Consequently,thesepromisingresultscould potentiallyleadtoanimprovementinthetherapeuticefficacyof anticancerdrug-loadedLNCsontumour-bearingrats.
3.5. Efficacyofintra-carotidtreatment
Survival of experimental animals was plotted on the Kaplan–MeiercurveasshowninFig.5.Resultsshowedthatintra- carotidtreatmentwithFcdiOH-LNCsslightlyincreasedthesurvival
Fig.5.Kaplan–Meiersurvival plotsfor9Lglioma-bearingratsreceivingintra- carotidinjectionoftreatmentatDay6aftercellimplantation.Survivaltimeswere plottedforuntreatedanimalsandtreatedanimalswithFcdiOH-LNCsorDSPE- mPEG2000–FcdiOH-LNCs(400lofLNCsuspension,correspondingto2.4mgof FcdiOHperrat).
time oftreatedanimals(median=27days)andwasstatistically significantcomparedtotheuntreatedcontrolgroup(P=0.0177), and wascomparable totreatmentbyCED injection(P=0.3172) (Fig.5).TreatmentwithDSPE-mPEG2000–FcdiOH-LNCsincreased the median survival time of rats to 30 days with an IST per- centage of 20% (P=0.0008). This result wasin agreement with thepreviously obtainedresultsabouttheenhanced fluorescent intensitymeasuredfromtheimagesofcoronalbrainslidesofrats receivinganintra-carotidinjectionofDSPE-mPEG2000–DiI-LNCs.
Thissurvivaltimegainissignificantandindicatesarealtreatment benefitas,inclinicaltrialsonhuman(EORTC/NCIC-protocol),the combination ofTemozolomide withfocalradiotherapy presents alsoa20%ISTincomparisontoradiotherapyalone(from12.1to 14.6months)(Stuppetal.,2005).
Asawell-knowncharacteristic,thecoatingwithlongchainsof PEGrendersnanoparticles‘invisible’totheimmunesystemafter injectioninthebloodthatconfersstealthpropertiestoPEGylated nanoparticles(Huynhetal.,2010).Thus,PEGylatednanoparticles havemorechancetoreachtumourtissuesandexhibittheintrinsic activityoftheentrappeddrug.Previously,Morille etal.demon- stratedthelong-circulatingpropertiesofDSPE-mPEG2000–LNCs owingtotheirweakcomplementactivationandlowmacrophage uptakeassociatedtoanextendedhalf-lifeinmiceascomparedto conventionalLNCs(Morilleetal.,2010).
Inaddition,for thisadministrationroute,crudeLNCsuspen- sionswereusedwithouttheadjustmentthatwasnecessaryfor CED injection.Toxicitywasnot evaluatedinthiscase asallthe componentswerescatteredinthebloodflow,whichisadifferent situationfromwhathappensinCEDinjection.Themainpurpose fortheutilityofcrudeLNCswastotakeadvantageofthehyperos- molarpropertiesofthesesuspensions.Indeed,theadministration of hypertonic substratescan leadtothe openingof tight junc- tionsoftheBBBduetotheshrinkageofendothelialcells,bywhich extracellularproteinsaredisorganised(Alametal.,2010).Conse- quently,drugentrytakesplaceinaparacellularfashionandduring thisstate,bothdiffusionandconvectionflowacrosstheBBBcan beconsiderablyenhanced (Rapoport,2000).Thus, nanoparticles couldpotentiallyreachthebraintumourtissues.Themechanism ofbrainentryaswellasthereversibilityandtimeofjunctionopen- ingwouldbeessentialtodetermineandwillbestudiedinfurther experiments.
Theremainingmatterwillbetoimprovetheinternalisationof drugintothetumourcells afterextravasation.To thisend, fur- theroptimisationoftheLNCsurfacebyattachingactiveligands whichcanspecificallyrecognisetumourcellsshouldbetakeninto consideration.Forexample,thecovalentcouplingofOX26mono- clonalantibodiestoLNCsattheendofthePEGmoleculesleadsto theformationofimmunonanocapsuleswhichspecificallyassociate invitrotocellsover-expressingthetransferrinreceptor(Beduneau etal.,2008).Indeed,OX26targetsthetransferrinreceptorswhich arehighlyexpressedonthecerebralendotheliumandalsoover- expressedonthesurfaceofproliferatingcellssuchasgliomacells (Hall,1991).ThisshouldfacilitatethepassageoftargetingLNCs throughtheBBB,followedbytheirinternalisationintothetumour cells.
4. Conclusion
To our knowledge, this is the first report involving a neu- ronal,side-effectstudyafterCEDadministrationofahyperosmotic infusate. At the same time, intra-arterial injection through the carotid artery was shown to represent a promising route of administration fordrug deliverytothebrain tumour bygiving nanoparticles more chance to cross the BBB. Results revealed theimportanceofthephysicochemicalpropertiesoftheinfusate
versusthebrainenvironment.Ineachadaptedcase,thebenefitof regionaldeliveryofadrugforbraincancerchemotherapywasevi- dencedandalsoconfirmedtheantitumourefficacyofFcdiOHinan orthotopic9Lgliosarcomamodelinrats.
Acknowledgments
TheauthorswouldliketothankPierreLegras(ServiceCommun d’AnimalerieHospitalo-Universitaire(SCAHU),Angers,France)for hisskilfultechnicalsupportinanimalexperiments,PascalPigeon for thesynthesis of FcdiOH and Gerard Jaouen for fruitful dis- cussions.We arealsogratefultoJoseHureaux,LaurenceSindji, FredericLagarce(InsermU646,Angers,France)andFlorenceFran- coni(Plateformed’Ingénierieetd’AnalysesMoléculaires(PIAM), Angers,France)fortheirhelpfultechnicalassistance.Thisworkis supportedbygrantsfrom“LaLigueNationaleContreleCancer”.
NgocTrinhHuynhwouldliketothanktheEmbassyofFrancein VietnamforitsEvaristGaloirfellowship.
References
Alam,M.I.,Beg,S.,Samad,A.,Baboota,S.,Kohli,K.,Ali,J.,Ahuja,A.,Akbar,M.,2010.
Strategyforeffectivebraindrugdelivery.Eur.J.Pharm.Sci.40,385–403.
Allard,E.,Hindre,F.,Passirani,C.,Lemaire,L.,Lepareur,N.,Noiret,N.,Menei,P., Benoit,J.P.,2008a.188Re-loadedlipidnanocapsulesasapromisingradiophar- maceuticalcarrierforinternalradiotherapyofmalignantgliomas.Eur.J.Nucl.
Med.Mol.Imaging35,1838–1846.
Allard,E.,Huynh,N.T.,Vessieres,A.,Pigeon,P.,Jaouen,G.,Benoit,J.P.,Passirani, C.,2009a.Doseeffectactivityofferrocifen-loadedlipidnanocapsulesona9L- gliomamodel.Int.J.Pharm.379,317–323.
Allard,E.,Jarnet,D.,Vessieres,A.,Vinchon-Petit,S.,Jaouen,G.,Benoit,J.P.,Passirani, C.,2010.Localdeliveryofferrociphenollipidnanocapsulesfollowedbyexternal radiotherapyasasynergistictreatmentagainstintracranial9Lgliomaxenograft.
Pharm.Res.27,56–64.
Allard,E.,Passirani,C.,Benoit,J.P.,2009b.Convection-enhanceddeliveryofnanocar- riersforthetreatmentofbraintumors.Biomaterials30,2302–2318.
Allard,E.,Passirani,C.,Garcion,E.,Pigeon,P.,Vessieres,A.,Jaouen,G.,Benoit,J.P., 2008b.Lipidnanocapsulesloadedwithanorganometallictamoxifenderivative asanoveldrug–carriersystemforexperimentalmalignantgliomas.J.Control Release130,146–153.
Anderson,A.W.,Xie,J.,Pizzonia,J.,Bronen,R.A.,Spencer,D.D.,Gore,J.C.,2000.Effects ofcellvolumefractionchangesonapparentdiffusioninhumancells.Mag.Reson.
Imaging18,689–695.
Beduneau, A., Hindre, F., Clavreul, A., Leroux, J.C., Saulnier, P., Benoit, J.P., 2008.Braintargetingusingnovellipidnanovectors.J.ControlRelease126, 44–49.
Bobo,R.H.,Laske,D.W.,Akbasak,A.,Morrison,P.F.,Dedrick,R.L.,Oldfield,E.H.,1994.
Convection-enhanceddeliveryofmacromoleculesinthebrain.Proc.Natl.Acad.
Sci.U.S.A.91,2076–2080.
Chertok,B.,David,A.E.,Yang,V.C.,2010.Polyethyleneimine-modifiedironoxide nanoparticlesforbraintumordrugdeliveryusingmagnetictargetingandintra- carotidadministration.Biomaterials31,6317–6324.
Demougeot,C.,Garnier,P.,Mossiat,C.,Bertrand,N.,Giroud,M.,Beley,A.,Marie, C.,2001.N-acetylaspartate,amarkerofbothcellulardysfunctionandneu- ronalloss:itsrelevancetostudiesofacutebraininjury.J.Neurochem.77, 408–415.
Figueiredo,E.G,Faria,J.W.,Teixeira,M.J.,2010.Treatmentofrecurrentglioblastoma withintra-arterialBCNU[1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea].Arq.Neurop- siquiatr.68,778–782.
Fortin,D.,Desjardins,A.,Benko,A.,Niyonsega,T.,Boudrias,M.,2005.Enhanced chemotherapydeliverybyintraarterialinfusionandblood–brainbarrierdis- ruptioninmalignantbraintumors:theSherbrookeexperience.Cancer103, 2606–2615.
Fujiwara,T.,Matsumoto,Y.,Honma,Y.,Kuyama,H.,Nagao,S.,Ohkawa,M.,1995.A comparisonofintraarterialcarboplatinandACNUforthetreatmentofgliomas.
Surg.Neurol.44,145–150.
Garcion,E.,Lamprecht,A.,Heurtault,B.,Paillard,A.,Aubert-Pouessel,A.,Denizot, B.,Menei,P.,Benoit,J.P.,2006.Anewgenerationofanticancer,drug-loaded, colloidalvectorsreversesmultidrugresistanceingliomaandreducestumor progressioninrats.Mol.CancerTher.5,1710–1722.
Grossman,S.A.,Batara,J.F.,2004.Currentmanagementofglioblastomamultiforme.
Semin.Oncol.31,635–644.
Hall,W.A.,1991.Transferrinreceptoronglioblastomamultiforme.J.Neurosurg.74, 313–314.
Heurtault,B.,Saulnier,P.,Pech,B.,Proust,J.E.,Benoit,J.P.,2002.Anovelphase inversion-basedprocessforthepreparationoflipidnanocarriers.Pharm.Res.
19,875–880.
Hillard,E.,Vessie`res,A.,Thouin,L.,Jaouen,G.,Amatore,C.,2005.Ferrocene-mediated proton-coupledelectrontransferinaseriesofferrocifen-typebreast-cancer drugcandidates.Angew.Chem.–Int.Ed.45,285–290.
Hong,R.L.,Huang,C.J.,Tseng,Y.L.,Pang,V.F.,Chen,S.T.,Liu,J.J.,Chang,F.H.,1999.
Directcomparisonofliposomaldoxorubicinwithorwithoutpolyethyleneglycol coatinginC-26tumor-bearingmice:issurfacecoatingwithpolyethyleneglycol beneficial?Clin.CancerRes.5,3645–3652.
Huynh,N.T.,Passirani,C.,Saulnier,P.,Benoit,J.P.,2009.Lipidnanocapsules:anew platformfornanomedicine.Int.J.Pharm.379,201–209.
Huynh,N.T.,Roger,E.,Lautram,N.,Benoit,J.P.,Passirani,C.,2010.Theriseand riseofstealthnanocarriersforcancertherapy:passiveversusactivetargeting.
Nanomedicine(Lond)5,1415–1433.
Jaouen,G.,Top,S.,Vessie`res,A.,Alberto,R.,2000a.Newparadigmsforsynthetic pathwaysinspiredbybioorganometallicchemistry.J.Organomet.Chem.600, 23–36.
Jaouen,G.,Top,S.,Vessières,A.,Leclercq,G.,Quivy,J.,Jin,L.,Croisy,A.,2000b.The firstorganometallicantioestrogensandtheirantiproliferativeeffects.C.R.Acad.
Sci.– Ser.IIc:Chem.3,89–93.
Joshi,S.,Meyers,P.M.,Ornstein,E.,2008.Intracarotiddeliveryofdrugs:thepotential andthepitfalls.Anesthesiology109,543–564.
Lemaire,L.,Franconi,F.,Lejeune,J.J.,Jallet,P.,Richomme,P.,1999.Improvingthe detectionoflowconcentrationmetabolitesinmagneticresonancespectroscopy bydigitalfiltering.Med.Biol.Eng.Comput.37,244–246.
Louis,D.N.,Ohgaki,H.,Wiestler,O.D.,Cavenee,W.K.,Burger,P.C.,Jouvet,A.,Schei- thauer,B.W.,Kleihues,P.,2007.The2007WHOclassificationoftumoursofthe centralnervoussystem.ActaNeuropathol.114,97–109.
Luh,E.H.,Shackford,S.R.,Shatos,M.A.,Pietropaoli,J.A.,1996.Theeffectsofhyper- osmolarityontheviabilityandfunctionofendothelialcells.J.Surg.Res.60, 122–128.
Moffett,J.R.,Ross,B.,Arun,P.,Madhavarao,C.N.,Namboodiri,A.M.A.,2007.N- acetylaspartate inthe CNS: from neurodiagnostics to neurobiology. Prog.
Neurobiol.81,89–131.
Morille,M.,Montier,T.,Legras,P.,Carmoy,N.,Brodin,P.,Pitard,B.,Benoit,J.P.,Passir- ani,C.,2010.Long-circulatingDNAlipidnanocapsulesasnewvectorforpassive tumortargeting.Biomaterials31,321–329.
Morille,M.,Passirani,C.,Letrou-Bonneval,E.,Benoit,J.P.,Pitard,B.,2009.Galacto- sylatedDNAlipidnanocapsulesforefficienthepatocytetargeting.Int.J.Pharm.
379,293–300.
Newton,H.B.,2006.Intra-arterialchemotherapy.In:Herbert,B.N.,Faan,M.D.(Eds.), HandbookofBrainTumorChemotherapy.,firsted.AcademicPress,SanDiego, pp.247–261.
Newton,H.B.,Slivka,M.A.,Volpi,C.,Bourekas,E.C.,Christoforidis,G.A.,Baujan, M.A.,Slone,W.,Chakeres,D.W.,2003.Intra-arterialcarboplatinandintravenous etoposideforthetreatmentofmetastaticbraintumors.J.Neurooncol.61,35–44.
Pardridge,W.M.,2005.Theblood–brainbarrier:bottleneckinbraindrugdevelop- ment.NeuroRx2,3–14.
Parkin,D.M.,Bray,F.,Ferlay,J.,Pisani,P.,2005.GlobalCancerStatistics,2002.CA:
CancerJ.Clin.55,74–108.
Petit,L.,Masson,F.,Cottenceau,V.,Sztark,F.,2006.Hypernatrémiecontrôlée.Ann.
Fr.Anesth.Reanim.25,828–837.
Rapoport,S.I.,2000.Osmoticopeningoftheblood-brainbarrier:principles,mech- anism,andtherapeuticapplications.Cell.Mol.Neurobiol.20,217–230.
Schem,B.C.,Krossnes,B.K.,1995.EnhancementofACNUtreatmentoftheBT4anrat gliomabylocalbrainhyperthermiaandintra-arterialdrugadministration.Eur.
J.Cancer31,1869–1874.
Schuff,N.,Meyerhoff,D.J.,Mueller,S.,Chao,L.,Sacrey,D.T.,Laxer,K.,Weiner,M.W., 2006.N-acetylaspartateasamarkerofneuronalinjuryinneurodegenerative disease.Adv.Exp.Med.Biol.576,241–262,discussion361–243.
Segal,M.B.,2000.Thechoroidplexusesandthebarriersbetweenthebloodandthe cerebrospinalfluid.Cell.Mol.Neurobiol.20,183–196.
Stupp,R.,Mason,W.P.,vandenBent,M.J.,Weller,M.,Fisher,B.,Taphoorn,M.J., Belanger,K.,Brandes,A.A.,Marosi,C.,Bogdahn,U.,etal.,2005.Radiotherapy plusconcomitantandadjuvanttemozolomideforglioblastoma.N.Engl.J.Med.
352,987–996.
Top,S.,Vessieres,A.,Leclercq,G.,Quivy,J.,Tang,J.,Vaissermann,J.,Huche,M.,Jaouen, G.,2003.Synthesis,biochemicalpropertiesandmolecularmodellingstudiesof organometallicspecificestrogenreceptormodulators(SERMs),theferrocifens andhydroxyferrocifens:evidenceforanantiproliferativeeffectofhydroxyfer- rocifensonbothhormone-dependentandhormone-independentbreastcancer celllines.Chemistry9,5223–5236.
Verbalis,J.G.,2010.Brainvolumeregulationinresponsetochangesinosmolality.
Neuroscience168,862–870.
Vessieres,A.,Top,S.,Pigeon,P.,Hillard,E.,Boubeker,L.,Spera,D.,Jaouen,G.,2005.
Modificationoftheestrogenicpropertiesofdiphenolsbytheincorporation offerrocene.Generationofantiproliferativeeffectsinvitro.J.Med.Chem.48, 3937–3940.
Vinchon-Petit,S.,Jarnet,D.,Paillard,A.,Benoit,J.P.,Garcion,E.,Menei,P.,2010.Invivo evaluationofintracellulardrug-nanocarriersinfusedintointracranialtumours byconvection-enhanceddelivery:distributionandradiosensitisationefficacy.
J.Neurooncol.97,195–205.
Vonarbourg,A.,Saulnier,P.,Passirani,C.,Benoit,J.P.,2005.Electrokineticproperties ofnonchargedlipidnanocapsules:influenceofthedipolardistributionatthe interface.Electrophoresis26,2066–2075.