• Aucun résultat trouvé

Streams, Contexts, and Dynamic Configuration

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Streams, Contexts, and Dynamic Configuration"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Streams, Contexts, and Dynamic Configuration

?

Thomas Eiter

Knowledge-Based Systems Group, Institute of Logic and Computation Vienna University of Technology Favoritenstraße 9-11, A-1040 Vienna, Austria

[email protected]

Talk Abstract

The increase in network connectivity and the availability of sensors and data sources of other kind has led to a growing interest in processing data streams, and in particu- lar reasoning over streams has received attention in the knowledge representation and reasoning community. Various formalisms have been proposed that offer different fea- tures in order to facilitate reasoning from and about a knowledge base over time in the presence of streaming data, often based on temporal logic and extensions. The need for addressing time and temporal evolution of knowledge bases has also led to respective extensions of multi-context systems (MCS), which are a generic formalism for modeling interlinked knowledge bases, calledcontexts, in an abstract way, where information exchange between contexts is enabled by special bridge rules. Among these formalisms are reactive, evolving, asynchronous, and streaming MCS, to name a few.

The generic framework of MCS allows to model particular formalisms, such as argumentation context systems which support group argumentation in the presence of mediators. In this talk, we consider dynamic configuration as another challenging prob- lem for possible realization by multi-context systems. Roughly speaking, components in a system, calledproducers, are controlled byconfiguratorswhich set parameters in order to determine the producers’s behaviour; in turn, configurators are linked tomonitors which observe sensors and feed information to the configurations. In the DynaCon approach, the configurations control also the monitors and may change their behaviour dynamically; this enables more sensitive configuration, while the system behaviour may get more complex, depending on the linkage structure, which in closed control loops is cyclic already in plain settings. The MCS framework and its temporal extensions provide a versatile tool for modeling dynamic configuration and the information flow among components modeled as contexts; notably, heterogeneous components, based on different logics or decision procedures, can be conveniently covered. We shall address issues and problems to consider in the MCS formulation for this application, which open new avenues of research.

?This work has been supported by TU Wien and the Austrian Research Promotion Agency project DynaCon (FFG 861263)

Références

Documents relatifs

O6K¶L*¦ÅO6K¶LGDMUÄSTQEF nDMIK ¡ DMI ¦ÅI$HKEO9”SEDGIQPHhI$H vwKEKEFNI$H CTªÄQPHlvRDMF vwSEªVI$H  EGFHJIKLMI@NO'IPQ6FHJI MIÈK O6QESEªVUÄIÈCPvRHlKEO6K‰CTªÄQPH e ªÄF

The initial independent variables entered into the regression model were the level of child- hood family problems, the level of childhood conduct problems, the presence of

The aim of this work is to study the turbulent deposition and capture of particles on a wall, in a situation where turbulence in the boundary layer originates both from wall shear

To associate semantics to the architectural shape forces above all to regard the building as a system of knowledge, then to extract a model from it description, and finally to

In the following, we assume that the PageRank scores for all entities in the knowledge base were computed (for example using the command line tool in Section 3) and stored using

In this paper, we propose an extended context representation for MAPE-K loop that integrates the history of planned actions as well as their expected effects over time into the

The proposed context model consists of a system model for collaborating systems in a dynamic context comprising context objects and context attributes, described in [Weiss et

In particular, if we assume that all contexts C i ’s knowledge bases and belief states are finite at any stage, all update functions U i , management functions mng i and