HAL Id: hal-00999768
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00999768v3
Preprint submitted on 27 Jan 2015
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Frobenius and non logarithmic ramification
Stéphanie Réglade
To cite this version:
Stéphanie Réglade. Frobenius and non logarithmic ramification. 2015. �hal-00999768v3�
FROBENIUS AND NON LOGARITHMIC RAMIFICATION
Stéphanie Reglade
Abstract: Aℓ-extension is said logarithmically unramified if it is locally cyclotomic. The purpose of this article is to explain the construction of the logarithmic Frobenius, which plays the role usually played by the classical Frobenius, but in the context of the logarithmic ramification.The interesting point is that usual and logarithmic Frobenius coincide when usual and logarithmic ramification are the same.
Key words: class field theory, ℓ-adic class field theory.
AMS Classification: 11R37
Contents
1 Recall: Logarithmic ramification 4
2 The local case 5
2.1 The degree map . . . . 5
2.2 The G-module . . . . 5
2.3 Logarithmic valuation and ℓ-adic degree . . . . 5
2.4 The logarithmic local symbol . . . . 7
3 The global case 8 3.1 G and the G-module . . . . 8
3.2 The degree map . . . . 8
3.3 The valuation . . . . 8
4 The logarithmic Frobenius 9 4.1 Logarithmic uniformizing elements on Q
p. . . . 9
4.2 Logarithmic uniformizing elements on R
Kp. . . . 9
4.3 The logarithmic conductor . . . . 9
4.4 The logarithmic Artin map . . . 11
4.5 Example: the quadratic case . . . 14
4.6 Generalization: from quadratic to ℓ-extensions . . . 15 Introduction :
The notion of logarithmic ramification was developped by Jaulent in [2]. The starting
point of this article is the following fact: let L/K be an extension of number fields, let
p be a prime of K, p is logarithmically unramified in L if L
P⊆ K ˆ
pc, where K ˆ
pcis the Z- ˆ
cyclotomic extension of K
p. Consequently the decomposition sub-group is cyclic. Thus we
may naturally wonder if there exists, in this decomposition sub-group, an element which
is going to play the role usually played by the classical Frobenius ?
Following Neukich’s abstract theory [1, chap.II], we first build the logarithmic local symbol.
Neukirch’s context starts with an abstract Galois theory and an abstract profinite group G. The key points of this formal theory are two fondamental morphims (the degree map and the valuation) and the class field axiom (cohomological condition on the G-module A we work with).
In this article, the local object we study is the ℓ-adification of the multiplicative group of a local field defined by Jaulent in [2]. It is endowed with the logarithmic valuation (we recall its construction). We first define the degree map. We then prove that Neukich’s abstract theory applies. This allows us to define the logarithmic local symbol. In particular we get an explicit expression for the logarithmic local symbol on the ℓ-adification of Q
p:
Proposition. Let ζ be a root of unity of order a ℓ-th power, and a ∈ R
Qp== Z
ℓ⊗
ZQ
×p. The logarithmic local symbol is:
(a, (Q
p(ζ)/Q
p)
ℓ)(ζ) = ζ
npwith
n
p=
p
vp(a)for p 6 = ℓ and p 6 = ∞ (1 + ℓ)
−˜vℓ(a)for p = ℓ
sgn(a) for p = ∞
where (Q(ζ)/Q)
ℓdenotes the projection on the ℓ-Sylow sub-group of Gal(Q(ζ)/Q).
Thus we study the global case. Finally, after choosing the logarithmic uniformizer ˜ π
p, we obtain the explicit construction of the logarithmic Frobenius:
Definition. Let L/K be an abelian ℓ-extension of number fields. Let p be a prime of K logarithmically unramified in L. The logarithmic Frobenius attached to p is:
( L/K g
p ) = ([ ˜ π
p], L/K )
where [˜ π
p] is the image of the uniformizing element π ˜
p, through the logarithmic global symbol defined on the ℓ-adic idele group J
K= Q
R
Kp.
We are now able to extend this map by multiplicativity. By this way, we obtain the logarithmic Artin map:
Definition. Let L/K be a finite and abelian ℓ-extension and p a prime of K logarithmically unramified in L. Let Dℓ
Kbe the group of logarithmic divisors of K, ˜ f
L/Kthe logarithmic global conductor of L/K and Dℓ
˜fKL/Kthe sub-module of logarithmic divisors prime to the conductor ˜ f
L/K. We define the logarithmic Artin map on Dℓ
˜fKL/Kas follows:
^ ( L/K
. ) : p ∈ Dℓ
˜fKL/K7→ ( L/K g
p ) ∈ Gal(L/K)
We study the properties of this map and give an expression of its kernel. We then focus
on the quadratic case and generalize it to the case of a ℓ-extension.
Notations
Let ℓ be a fixed prime number. Let’s introduce the notations.
For a local field K
pwith maximal ideal p and uniformizer π
p, we let:
R
Kp= lim
←−
kK
p×K
p×ℓk: the ℓ-adification of the multiplicative group of a local field U
Kp= lim
←−
kU
pU
pℓk: the ℓ-adification of the group of units U
pof K
pU
p1: the group of principal units of K
pµ
0p: the subgroup of U
p, whose order is finite and prime to p µ
p: the ℓ- Sylow subgroup of µ
0pFor a number field K we define:
R
K= Z
ℓ⊗
ZK
×: the ℓ-adic group of principal ideles J
K= Q
resp∈P lK
R
Kp: the ℓ-adic idele group U
K= Q
p∈P lK
U
Kp: the subgroup of units C
K= J
K/ R
K: the ℓ-adic idele class group In the logarithmic context, we denote:
Q ˆ
cp: the cyclotomic Z-extension of b Q
pQ
cp: the cyclotomic Z
ℓ-extension of Q
p˜
v
p: the logarithmic valuation attached to p sur R
KpU e
Kp= Ker( ˜ v
p) : the sub-group of local logarithmic units U e
K= Q
p∈P lK
U e
Kp: the sub-group of logarithmic units
˜
e
p= [K
p: ˆ Q
cp∩ K
p] : the logarithmic absolute ramification index of p f ˜
p= [ ˆ Q
cp∩ K
p: Q
p] : the logarithmic absolute inertia degree of p
˜
e
LP/Kp= [L
P: ˆ K
pc∩ L
P] : the relative logarithmic ramification index of p f ˜
LP/Kp= [ K c
pc∩ L
P: K
p] : the logarithmic relative inertia degree of p J
K(m)= Q
p∤m
R
KpQ
p|m
U e
Kvpp(m)J
Km= Q
p∤m
R
KpQ
p|m
U e
KpU e
K(m)= Q
p∤m
U
KpQ
p|m
U e
Kvpp(m)R
(m)K= R
K∩ J
K(m)div ˜ : α = (α
p) ∈ J
Km7−→ div(α) = ˜ Q
p
v˜p(αp)∈ Dℓ
mKD ℓ
mK= ˜ div( J
Km) : logarithmic divisors prime to m
P ℓ
(m)K= ˜ div( R
(m)K) : principal logarithmic divisors attached to m e f
L/K: the logarithmic global conductor L/K
e f
p: the logarithmic local conductor attached to p (
L/Kg
p
): the logarithmic Frobenius attached to p
A ℓ
L/Kthe logarithmic Artin group of L/K
1 Recall: Logarithmic ramification
We first recall the notion of logarithmic ramification developped by Jaulent in [2].
Let K, L be number fields, p a prime number, p a prime of K above p and P a prime of L lying above p. Let’s denote Q c
cpthe Z-cyclotomic extension of b Q
p, i.e. the compositum of all Z
q-cyclotomic extensions of Q
pfor all primes q.
Definition 1. Absolute and relative indexes : [2, definition 1.3]
i) the absolute and relative logarithmic ramification index of p are respectively:
˜
e
p= [K
p: ˆ Q
cp∩ K
p] ˜ e
LP/Kp= [L
P: ˆ K
pc∩ L
P]
ii) the absolute and relative logarithmic inertia degree of p are respectively:
f ˜
p= [ ˆ Q
cp∩ K
p: Q
p] f ˜
LP/Kp= [ K c
pc∩ L
P: K
p]
iii) K/Q is said logarithmically unramified at p if e ˜
p= 1, which means K
p⊆ Q c
cp. iv) L/K is said logarithmically unramified at p if ˜ e
LP/Kp= 1, which implies L
P⊆ K c
pc.
v) These indexes satisfy the relations: e ˜
P= ˜ e
LP/Kp.˜ e
pet f ˜
P= ˜ f
LP/Kp. f ˜
pAccording to the diagramm: [7, 1.1.3]
L
P˜ eL
P/Kp
f˜P
ssssssssss
L
P∩ Q c
cp e˜p˜ eP
yyyyyyyyy
K c
pc∩ L
Pf˜LP/Kp
Q
p f˜pK
p∩ Q c
cp e˜pK
pProposition 1.0.1. [2, theorem 1.4] With the pevious notations, classical and logarithmic indexes are linked by this formula:
˜
e
p. f ˜
p= e
p.f
p= [K
p: Q
p]
Fundamental remark: [2, p. 4] Assume K/Q is a finite ℓ-extension such that [K : Q] = ℓ
nwith n ≥ 1. Then Q c
cp/Q
cponly contains sub-extensions of order prime to ℓ.
In particular the degree of [ Q c
cp∩ K
p: Q
cp∩ K
p] is prime to ℓ and as it also divides ℓ
n, we deduce [c Q
cp∩ K
p: Q
cp∩ K
p] = 1. The equality of fields Q c
cp∩ K
p= Q
cp∩ K
pimplies this equivalence:
˜
e
p= 1 ⇔ K
p⊆ Q
cpand f ˜
p= 1 ⇔ Q
cp∩ K
p= Q
cp.
As Q
cp/Q
pis a Galois extension, the previous condition means that the extensions K
pet Q
cpare linearly separated on Q
p.
As we work with ℓ-extensions, we may replace in the previous definitions Q c
cpby Q
cp.
2 The local case
2.1 The degree map
Let K
pabbe the maximal abelian pro-ℓ-extension of K
p. On the Galois group Gal(K
pab(ζ
ℓ∞)/K
p), the Teichmuller’s character ω is defined as the character of the action on roots of unity. It is defined for pro-ℓ-extensions as the restriction to the pro-ℓ-part of the whole character.
We thus define the degree map:
deg : G = Gal(K
pab/K
p) → Z
ℓφ 7→ ω(φ)
where K
pabis the maximal abelian pro-ℓ-extension of K
p.
We then follow Neukich’s abstract construction. If L
Pis a finite ℓ-extension of K
p, the logarithmic ramification index and the logarirhmic inertia degree appear naturally:
f ˜
LP/Kp= [L
P∩ K
pc: K
p] e ˜
LP/Kp= [L
P: L
P∩ K
pc] Those definitions coincide with those given by Jaulent [2] .
Remark: We replace here in the definitions K ˆ
pcby K
pcbecause we work with ℓ-extensions.
2.2 The G -module
We introduce the ℓ-adification of the multiplicative group of a local field: R
LP= lim
←−
kL
×PL
×ℓPkdefined by Jaulent [3, def.1.2]. The G-module we study is the same as before [5, §2.2]:
A = lim R
LP, where L
Pruns through all finite sub-extensions of K
p. It can be canonically identified to: A = S
[LP:Kp]<∞
R
LP. If L
Pis a finite extension of K
p, A
LP= R
LPis the Gal(L
P/K
p)-module we are going to work with.
2.3 Logarithmic valuation and ℓ -adic degree
Definition 2. Let K be a finite extension of Q, p a prime number. Let’s denote Q c
cpthe Z-cyclotomic extension of b Q
pand let p be a prime of K above p.
i) The ℓ-adic degree of p is: deg
ℓ(p) =
Log
Iw(p) if p 6 = ℓ Log
Iw(1 + ℓ) if p = ℓ ii) The ℓ-adic degree of p is: deg(p) = ˜ f
p· deg
ℓ(p)
iii) Let v
pbe the usual normalized valuation on K
p, the absolute principal ℓ-adic valua- tion, defined on K
p×is:
if p ∤ ℓ then | x
p| =< N p
−vp(x)>
if p | ℓ then | x
p| =< N
Kp/Qℓ(x)N p
−vp(x)>
where N p is the absolute norm of p and u −→ < u > is the canonical surjection from Z
ℓ×to the group of principal units.
iv )the logarithmic valuation attached to p is: ˜ v
p(x) = − Log
Iw(N
Kp/Qp(x))/deg
ℓ(p) ,
defined on R
Kpvalued to Z
ℓ, [1][Prop.1.2]
Remark: This definition of the logarithmic valuation is here different from the one given by Jaulent [2, définition 1.1]. Indeed the ℓ-adic degree of ℓ, deg
ℓ(ℓ), is equal to ℓ initially and to Log
Iw(1 + ℓ) in our case. This is motivated by the fact that we want an explicit expression for the logarithmic uniformizers.
Proposition 2.3.1. [2, proposition 1.2]
Let p be a prime number, Q
cpthe Z-cyclotomic extension of ˆ Q
p, K
p/Q
pa finite extension of degree d
pand | . |
pthe principal absolute ℓ-adic valuation on K
p×. Then:
i) for all x ∈ K
p×the expression h
p(x) = − Log( | x |
p/d
p.deg
ℓ(p) does not depend on the choice of the extension of Q
pcontaining x ;
ii) the restriction h
pof h
pto the multiplicative group of K
p×, yields a Z
ℓ-morphism from R
Kpto Q
ℓ, whose kernel is U ˜
Kpand whose image is the Z
ℓ-lattice 1/˜ e
p· Z
ℓiii) the logarithmic valuation satisfies: v ˜
p= ˜ e
p· h
p.
iv) let p be a prime of K which is not above ℓ, classical and logarithmic valuations are proportional:
˜ v
p= f
pf ˜
p· v
p= e ˜
pe
p· v
pProposition 2.3.2. The logarithmic valuation v ˜
pchecks two properties:
i) v ˜
p( R
Kp) = Z with Z ⊂ Z et Z/n.Z ≃ Z/n.Z for all n ;
ii) v ˜
p(N
LP/KpR
LP) = ˜ f
LP/KpZ for all finite extension L
Pof K
p.
Thus the logarithmic valuation is henselian with respect to the degree map, according to Neukirch’s definition.
Proof. For the first criterium (i) we use the definition of the logarithmic valuation :
˜
v
p( R
Kp) = Z
ℓ; ainsi Z = Z
ℓet Z/n.Z ≃ Z/n.Z for all n.
For the second criterium (ii) we use this diagramm [2, proposition 1.1] : K
p×−−−−−−→
extensionL
×P−−−−→
N ormK
p× y
y h
pQ
ℓ−−−−→ Q
ℓ−−−−−→
[LP:Kp]Q
ℓIt follows h
p(N
LP/Kp) = [L
P: K
p] h
P. From, v ˜
p(N
LP/KpR
LP) = ˜ e
ph
p(N
LP/KpR
LP) we de- duce v ˜
p(N
LP/KpR
LP) = [L
P: K
p] ˜ e
ph
P( R
LP) thus ˜ v
p(N
LP/KpR
LP) = [L
P: K
p] ˜ e
p/˜ e
PZ
ℓby [2, proposition 1.2], then h
P( R
LP) = 1/ e ˜
PZ
ℓ. According to [proposition 5.1.1],we get:
[L
P: K
p] = ˜ f
LP/Kpe ˜
LP/Kp; so [L
P: K
p] ˜ e
p/˜ e
P=
f˜˜P˜eP˜epfpe˜p·˜eP
Thus v ˜
p(N
LP/KpR
LP) =
f˜˜Pfp
Z
ℓand finally v ˜
p(N
LP/KpR
LP) = ˜ f
LP/Kp
Z.
2.4 The logarithmic local symbol
Theorem 2.4.1. (deg, v ˜
p) is a class field theory and R
Kpsatisfies the class field axiom [5, theorem 2.5.1]. Thus for all finite and abelian ℓ-extension L
Pof K
p(finite extension of Q
p) we have this isomorphism :
Gal(L
P/K
p) ≃ R
Kp/N
LP/KpR
LPDefinition 3. It allows us to define a surjective homomorphism: the logarithmic local symbol
( , L
P/K
p) : R
Kp−→ Gal(L
P/K
p) Moreover, for all archimedean place p of Q, we have [2, i), p. 4]
R
Qp=
( µ
p.p
Zℓfor p 6 = ℓ (1 + ℓ)
Zℓ· ℓ
Zℓfor p = ℓ Thus we have a decomposition of the shape : R
Qp≃ U e
Qp. π ˜
pZℓ.
Proposition 2.4.1. We have an explicit expression for the logarithmic local symbol. Let ζ be a root of unity of ℓ-th power and a ∈ R
Qp. The logarithmic local symbol is:
(a, (Q
p(ζ )/Q
p))
ℓ= ζ
npwith
n
p=
p
vp(a)for p 6 = ℓ and p 6 = ∞ (1 + ℓ)
−˜vℓ(a)for p = ℓ
sgn(a) for p = ∞
where (Q(ζ)/Q)
ℓdenotes the projection on the ℓ-Sylow sub-group of Gal(Q(ζ)/Q).
Remark: If p is real and ℓ = 2 then we have R
Q∞≃
2ZZ, it is trivial in any other cases, [3, Prop.1.2] : sgn(a) is ± 1 in the first case and 1 in the other cases.
Proof. Let ζ be a ℓ
m-th root of unity, with ℓ
m6 = 2. We take a ∈ R
Qpand write a = u
p· p
vp(a)for p 6 = ℓ, where v
pis the usual normalized valuation of Q
p, which coincide in this particular case with the logarithmic valuation. For p = ℓ, we write a = ℓ
vℓ(a).(1 + ℓ)
v˜ℓ(a). For p 6 = ℓ and p 6 = ∞ the extension Q
p(ζ )/Q
pis an unramified extension. The fundamental principle [1, Th. 2.6, p. 25] states that the local symbol associates the Frobenius elements to the uniformizing elements; we have already seen that (p, (Q
p(ζ )/Q
p))
ℓis the usual Frobenius automorphism φ
p: ζ −→ ζ
p. Moreover this diagramm is commutative:
K
p×−−−−−−−−−−−→
(·˙,Gal(LP/Kp))Gal(L
P/K
p)
y
y R
Kp(·˙,Gal(LP/Kp))ℓ
−−−−−−−−−−−→ Gal(L
P/K
p)
ℓwhere the symbol on the top is the usual local symbol and the symbol on the bottom is the ℓ-adic local symbol. That is why we deduce:
(a, (Q
p(ζ )/Q
p)
ℓ)ζ = ζ
npwith
n
p=
( p
vp(a)for p 6 = ℓ and p 6 = ∞ sgn(a) for p = ∞
But we want to have [a, (Q(ζ )/Q)
ℓ] = 1 for a ∈ R
Qin order to be able to define the valuation in the logarithmic global context:
[a, (Q(ζ )/Q)
ℓ]ζ = Y
p
(a, (Q
p(ζ)/Q
p)
ℓ)ζ = ζ
α.
Thus, by the product formula, taking n
ℓ= (1 + ℓ)
−vℓ(a), we get : α = Q
p
n
p= sgn(a) · Q
p6=∞
p
vp(a)· ℓ
−vℓ(a)· (1 + ℓ)
−˜vℓ(a)= a · a
−1= 1, as waited.
3 The global case
3.1 G and the G -module
Let G be the Galois group of the maximal abelian pro-ℓ-extension of Q. We introduce the ℓ-adic idele class group for a given number field K refer to Jaulent [3, definition 1.4]. Like previously [5, §3.4] the G-module is the union of all ℓ-adic idele class groups C
K, where K runs through all finite extensions of K : S
[K:Q]<∞
C
Kand C
Lis our Gal(L/K)-module.
3.2 The degree map
We fix an isomorphism: Gal( ˜ Q/Q) ≃ Z. b This allows to define:
deg g : G = Gal(Q
ab/Q) → Z ˆ φ 7→ φ
|˜Q
where Q
abis the maximal abelian pro-ℓ-extension of Q. Let K/Q be a finite extension, we define: f
K= [K ∩ Q ˜ : Q] and we get, by analogy with the abstract case [1, ch.2], a surjective homomorphism g deg
K=
f1K
· g deg such that g deg
K: G
K−→ Z ˆ defines the Z-extension ˆ K ˜ of K.
3.3 The valuation
Due to the property, ∀ a ∈ R
K, [a, K/K] = 1. ˜ we put this definition:
Definition 4. We define the valuation e v
K: C
K−→ Z ˆ as follows:
C
K[·,K/K]˜
−−−−−→ G( ˜ K/K) −−−−→
degfKZ ˆ
Lemma 3.3.1. This valuation e v
Kis henselian with respect to the degree map deg. f Proof. Arguments are the same as [5, lemma 3.6.4] replacing U
Kpby U e
Kp.
Theorem 3.3.1. ( deg, f v e
K) is a class field theory and C
K[4, theorem 3.3.1] satisfies the class field axiom. Thus for all finite and abelian ℓ-extensions L of K, we get an isomorphism:
Gal(L/K) ≃ J
K/N
L/K( J
L) R
KDefinition 5. This allows to define a surjective homomorphism, called the global logarith- mic symbol:
( · , L/K ) : J
K−→ Gal(L/K)
4 The logarithmic Frobenius
4.1 Logarithmic uniformizing elements on Q
pLogarithmic uniformizing elements on R
Qp:
If p ∤ ℓ : the classical uniformizing element p is also a uniformizing element for the logrithmic valuation.
If p = ℓ : due to the expression of R
Qℓ, we have R
Qℓ= U
QℓU e
Qℓwith U e
Qℓ≃ ℓ
Zℓand U
Qℓ≃ 1 + ℓZ
ℓ.
We consider a logarithmic uniformizing element ℓ ˜ such that
˜
v
ℓ(˜ ℓ) = 1 et ℓ ˜ ∈ U
Qℓ. thus we obtain the decomposition:
R
Qℓ= ˜ ℓ
Zℓℓ
Zℓ.
On Q
ℓthis is the choice of the denominator in the expression of the logarithmic valuation, i.e. the ℓ-adic degree of ℓ, which enforces ℓ. The condition ˜ Log(˜ ℓ) = deg
ℓ(ℓ), which comes from ˜ v
ℓ(˜ ℓ) = 1, defines ℓ ˜ up to a logarithmic unit. But we have U e
Qℓ∩U
Qℓ= 1, thus ℓ ˜ is determined by the choice of the denominator.
For instance, if we choose the ℓ-adic degree of ℓ as equal to Log(1 + ℓ), we get: ℓ ˜ = 1 + ℓ.
4.2 Logarithmic uniformizing elements on R
KpIf p ∤ ℓ, the classical uniformizing element π
pis also a uniformizer for the logarithmic valuation, in this case both valuations are proportional: π
p= ˜ π
p.
If p | ℓ, then we have in this case R
Kp≃ U
p1π
pZℓ. By definition a uniformizing element is an element ˜ π
pof R
Kpsuch that :
Log
Iw(N
Kp/Qℓ(˜ π
p)) = ˜ f
pdeg
ℓ(ℓ) = Log
Iw(˜ ℓ
f˜p).
This defines π ˜
pup to a logarithmic unit.
4.3 The logarithmic conductor
In usual local class field theory, we have the decreasing filtration of the group of units U
Kpof K
p×:
U
K(n)p
= 1 + p
nwhere p is the maximal ideal of the ring of integers.
(U
K(n)p)
nare a system of neighboorhoods of 1 in K
p×. Thanks to this filtration, we define
the local and the global conductor attached to an extension.
Let’s give a decreasing filtration of the group of logarithmic units ( U e
Knp)
n∈Nwith U e
K0p= U e
Kp.
Definition 6. We are now able to define a logarithmic local and global conductor, as follows:
i) Let L
P/K
pbe an abelian ℓ-extension and n the smallest integer such that U e
Knp⊆ N
LP/Kp( R
LP) then the ideal:
˜ f
p= p
ndefines the logarithmic local conductor attached to this extension.
ii) Let L/K be a finite and abelian ℓ-extension, the global logarithlic conductor is:
˜ f
L/K= Y
p
˜ f
pProposition 4.3.1. The p-conductor ˜ f
pis trivial if and only if the extension L/K is logarithmically unramified at p. The logarithmic global conductor ˜ f
L/Kcontains all the primes of K which are logarithmically unramified in L and only those. Besides, if M is between K and L then ˜ f
M/Kdivides ˜ f
L/K.
Proof. If p is a prime of K logarithmically unramified in L, we have ˜ e
LP/Kp= 1, and due to [1]Prop.2.2.p.22 :
H
0(Gal(L
P/K
p), U e
LP) = 1;
it follows:
U e
Kp= N
LP/Kp( U e
LP), which means
U e
Kp⊆ N
LP/Kp( R
LP).
Conversely, let’s assume that f
pis trivial, we deduce U e
Kp⊆ N
LP/Kp( R
LP). Let n = [ R
Kp: N
LP/Kp( R
LP)] ; from π ˜
pn∈ N
LP/Kp( R
LP) we get (˜ π
pn) U e
Kp⊆ N
LP/Kp( R
LP). Thus it follows L
P⊆ M , where M is the class field of (˜ π
np) U e
Kpi.e. N
M/Kp( R
M) = (˜ π
pn) · U e
Kp. But U e
Kp⊆ N
M/Kp( R
M) which means that the p-conducteur is trivial. Applying the first part, we deduce that M/K
pis logarithmically unramified. By ℓ-adic class field theory, we obtain: Gal(M/K
p) ≃ (˜ π
p) U e
Kp/(˜ π
pn) U e
Kp. Consequently, M is the ℓ-extension of degree n logarithmically unramified; and from L
P⊆ M, we conclude that p is logarithmically unramified in L.
Examples
1) For Q
ℓ, we have U e
Qℓ≃ ℓ
Zℓ≃ Z
ℓ, that is why we get a filtration of U e
Qℓby raising in U e
Qℓthe canonical filtration Z
ℓby ℓ
nZ
ℓ, for n ∈ N.
2) Given a local field K
p, we get a filtration of the logarithmic units U e
Kpas follows:
- if p | ℓ by raising the local norm N
Kp/Qℓthe filtration of units on Q
ℓ: U e
Knp= { x ∈ R
Kp| N
Kp/Qℓ(x) ∈ (ℓ)
ℓnZℓ} . So, we have T
n
U e
Knp= { x ∈ R
Kp| N
Kp/Qℓ(x) = 1 } . But by class field theory, the compositum K
pQ
abℓis fixed by the kernel of the norm. Thus the decreasing sequence ( U e
Knp)
nis not exhaustive.
- if p 6| ℓ, as U e
Kp≃ µ
pthe natural filtration is 0 ⊂ µ
p. 4.4 The logarithmic Artin map
Let K be a number field, the ℓ-group of logarithmic divisors of K is [2, Def.2.1]:
D ℓ
K= J
K/ U e
K≃ M
p
Z
ℓp
through the logarithmic valuations (˜ v
p)
pit can be identified to a free Z
ℓ-module built on finite primes of K.
Definition 7. Let L/K be a finite and abelian ℓ-extension, p a prime of K logarithmi- cally unramified in L, D ℓ
Kbe the group of logarithmic divisors of K , ˜ f
L/Kbe the global logarithmic conductor L/K and D ℓ
˜fKL/Kthe sub-group of logarithmic divisors prime to ˜ f
L/K. We define the logarithmic Frobenius of a prime p logarithmically unramified, as follows:
( L/K g
p ) = ([˜ π
p], L/K )
where π ˜
pis the logarithmic uniformising element, defined in proposition 3.7.3 and [˜ π
p] the image of π ˜
pin J
K.
We extend this map by multiplicativity:
( ^
L/K.) : D ℓ
˜fKL/K→ Gal(L/K ) p 7→ (
L/Kg
p
)
Few remarks:
1) The previous application is extended by multiplicativity to D ℓ
˜fKL/Kas by hypothesis L/K is a ℓ-extension.
2) This map is a surjective Z
ℓ-morphism, due to the surjectivity of the global symbol.
3) The motivation of this definition is the fact that in abstract class field theory [1, Prop.3.4 ], if a ∈ A
K, ( , L/K ) the norm residue symbol of L/K satisfies:
(a, K/K) = ˜ φ
vKK(a)where φ
Kis the generic Frobenius of K/K. ˜
4) When p 6| ℓ, the usual valuation and the logarithmic one are proportional: conse-
quently π ˜
p= π
p, the Z
ℓ-unramified extension and the Z
ℓ-cyclotomic one are the
same. Thus the classical Artin symbol and the logarithmic one coincide on ideals.
Proposition 4.4.1. Properties of the logarithmic Artin map
Let L/K be a finite and abelian ℓ-extension, ˜ f
L/Kthe logarithmic global conductor. Then we have:
i) If M is between L and K, the restriction of ^
(
L/Ka) to M is ^
(
M/Ka), for all a ∈ D ℓ
˜fKL/Kii) Let L and L
′be abelian ℓ-extensions, let’s consider Gal(LL
′/K) as a sub-group of Gal(L/K) × Gal(L
′/K), through the map σ ∈ Gal(LL
′/K) → (σ |
L, σ |
L′) ∈ Gal(L/K) × Gal(L
′/K), then ^
(
LL′a/K) is ( ^
(
L/Ka), ^
(
L′a/K)) for all a ∈ D ℓ
˜fLLLL′′/Kiii) Let K
′be any sub-extension of K, and let’s consider Gal(LK’/K’) as isomorphic, by restriction to K, to a sub-group of Gal(L/K). The restriction of ^
(
LKa′/K′ ′) to K is (
N^
KK′/Ka′
) for all a
′∈ D ℓ
˜fKL/K′ ′iv) In particular, if M is a field between L and K, we have ^
(
L/MU) = ^ (
NL/KMU
), for all U ∈ D ℓ
˜fML/K.
Proof. i) It sufficies to check the property on each prime p. By the fonctoriality property of the reciprocity map, we have: res
M◦ φ
L/K(˜ π
p) = φ
M/K(˜ π
p).
ii) is a consequence of i)
iii) We have to prove the equality between ^
(
LKa′/K′ ′) |
K= φ
LK′/K′(a
′) and ( ^
NLK′a′
) = φ
L/K(N
K′(a
′)) for all a
′∈ D ℓ
˜fKL/K′ ′. By the fonctoriality property of the reciprocity map, we obtain this commutative diagramm:
Gal(L
′/K
′)
rL′/K′
−−−−→ J
K′/N
L′/K′( J
L′) R
K′ y
y
NK′/KGal(L/K) −−−−→
rL /KJ
K/N
L/K( J
L) R
Kwhere r
L/Kis the reciprocity map for global ℓ-adic class field theory. Consequently we have the following diagramm for the logarithmic global symbol:
J
K′(·,L′/K′)
−−−−−−→ Gal(LK
′/K
′)
NK′/K
y
y
resJ
K(·,L /K)
−−−−−−→ Gal(L /K )
and we deduce the property from res ◦ ( · , LK
′/K
′) = ( · , L/K ) ◦ N
K′/K. iv) is a particular case of iii) taking K
′= L
Definition 8. The kernel A ℓ
L/Kof the previous application (
L/Kg
.
) is called the Artin
logarithmic sub-module. For every modulus m divisible by the global logarithmic conductor
of L/K, we put A ℓ
L/K,m= A
L/K∩ D ℓ
mK.
Definition 9. Let L/K be an abelian ℓ-extension, m a modulus dividing the logarithmic global conductor, we define:
J
K(m)= Y
p6|m
R
KpY
p|m
U e
Kvpp(m)R
(m)K= R
K∩ J
K(m)Theorem 4.4.1. Let L/K be a finite and abelian ℓ-extension, we have : A ℓ
L/K= Gal(L/K) ≃ P ℓ
(˜KfL/K)· N
L/K( D ℓ
˜fLL/K)
where P ℓ
(˜KfL/K)is the sub-module of logarithmic principal divisors, image of the elements of R
(˜KfL/K).
Proof. Let’s denote here the logarithmic global conductor of L/K by ˜ f. By global ℓ-adic class field theory, we know:
Gal(L/K ) ≃ J
K/N
L/K( J
L) R
K.
By the ℓ-adic approximation lemma [4, II.2], we know that the morphism of semi- localization R
K−→ Q
p∈S
R
Kpis surjective for all finite set of primes S.
It follows:
J
K= J
KefR
K. Thus we get:
Gal(L/K ) ≃ J
K˜f/N
L/K( J
L˜f) R
˜fK. But the elements of U e
K(˜f)= Q
p6|˜f
U e
KpQ
p|˜f
U e
Kvpp(˜f)are norms : if p 6| ˜ f, p is logarithmically unramified and units are norms, moreover if p | ˜ f, the definition of the conductor implies that those elements are norms. Due to this remark, we deduce:
Gal(L/K) ≃ J
K˜f/N
L/K( J
L˜f) U e
K(ef)R
˜fK.
But by the next lemma, we have: U e
K(˜f)R
˜fK= U e
KR
(˜Kf). Finally we obtain:
Gal(L/K ) ≃ D ℓ
˜fK/ P ℓ
(˜Kf)· N
L/K( D ℓ
˜fL).
Lemma 4.4.1. With the same notations, we get:
U e
K(˜f)R
˜fK= U e
KR
(˜Kf).
Proof. Let’s take α ∈ U e
K(˜f)R
˜fKand write α = ur with u ∈ U e
K(˜f)and r ∈ R
˜fK. This last condition implies that for all primes p dividing the conductor, the local component r
pis a logarithmic unit. The approximation lemma gives a principal idele β, whose local components for the primes dividing the conductor are r
p. Finally we get αβ
−1∈ U e
KR
(˜Kf): this is the first inclusion.
Conversely, let’s consider α ∈ U e
KR
(˜Kf)and write α = ur with now u ∈ U e
Kand r ∈ R
(˜Kf). As u ∈ U e
K, the local component u
pis a logarithmic unit and in particular for p | ˜ f. Due to the approximation lemma we get a principal idele β, whose local components for the primes p | ˜ f are u
p. Finally αβ
−1∈ U e
K(˜f)R
˜fK. The equality follows.
Remark : Let’s notice the analogy between the expression of the classical Takagi’s group and the logarithmic Artin sub-module.
Theorem 4.4.2. Let L/K be a finite and abelian ℓ-extension, m a modulus of K divisible by ˜ f
L/K, then (
L/Kg
.