Sex-related differences and age of peak performance in breaststroke versus freestyle swimming.

HAL Id: inserm-00922057

https://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-00922057

Submitted on 23 Dec 2013

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Mathias Wolfrum, Beat Knechtle, Christoph Rüst, Thomas Rosemann, Romuald Lepers

To cite this version:

Mathias Wolfrum, Beat Knechtle, Christoph Rüst, Thomas Rosemann, Romuald Lepers. Sex-related differences and age of peak performance in breaststroke versus freestyle swimming.. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, BioMed Central, 2013, 5 (1), pp.29. �10.1186/2052-1847-5-29�.

�inserm-00922057�

R E S E A R C H A R T I C L E Open Access

Sex-related differences and age of peak

performance in breaststroke versus freestyle swimming

Mathias Wolfrum

, Beat Knechtle

, Christoph Alexander Rüst

, Thomas Rosemann

and Romuald Lepers

Abstract

Background: Sex-related differences in performance and in age of peak performance have been reported for freestyle swimming. However, little is known about the sex-related differences in other swimming styles. The aim of the present study was to compare performance and age of peak performance for elite men and women swimmers in breaststroke versus freestyle.

Methods: Race results were analyzed for swimmers at national ranked in the Swiss high score list (during 2006 through 2010) and for international swimmers who qualified for the finals of the FINA World Swimming Championships (during 2003 through 2011).

Results: The sex-related difference in swimming speed was significantly greater for freestyle than for breaststroke over 50 m, 100 m, and 200 m race distances for Swiss swimmers, but not for FINA finalists. The sex-related difference for both freestyle and breaststroke swimming speeds decreased significantly with increasing swimming distance for both groups. Race distance did not affect the age of peak performance by women in breaststroke, but age of peak performance was four years older for FINA women than for Swiss women. Men achieved peak swimming performance in breaststroke at younger ages for longer race distances, and the age of peak swimming performance was six years older for FINA men than for Swiss men. In freestyle swimming, race distance did not affect the age of peak swimming performance for Swiss women, but the age of peak swimming performance decreased with increasing race distance for Swiss men and for both sexes at the FINA World Championships.

Conclusions: Results of the present study indicate that (i) sex-related differences in swimming speed were greater for freestyle than for breaststroke for swimmers at national level, but not for swimmers at international level, and (ii) both female and male swimmers achieved peak swimming speeds at younger ages in breaststroke than in freestyle.

Further studies are required to better understand differences between trends at national and international levels.

Keywords: Woman, Man, Endurance, Performance

Background

It was often assumed that men will outperform women in all sporting events requiring substantial physical exer- tion [1-3]. Tanaka and Seals [4,5] found this assumption to be true for running, cycling, and ice-skating, but found a different performance pattern in swimming. For swimming, the sex-related difference in performance was greatest in short duration events and became

progressively smaller with increasing distance. Tanaka [5] estimated that women would outperform men at a swim distance of 25 km. In fact, records for the ‘ English Channel Swim ’ during 1900 – 2010 showed similar per- formances by women and men at a distance of 32 km [6]. Furthermore, an Australian woman holds the world record for the longest non-stop ocean swim: 196 km in 38 h 33 min [7]. The smaller body size, the higher pro- portion of body fat, and the shorter legs of female ath- letes are factors that prevent women from keeping up with men in other sports, but may contribute to their relatively high performance in swimming [8,9].

* Correspondence:beat.knechtle@hispeed.ch

1Institute of General Practice and for Health Services Research, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

3Gesundheitszentrum St. Gallen, Vadianstrasse 26, St. Gallen 9001, Switzerland Full list of author information is available at the end of the article

© 2013 Wolfrum et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Wolfrumet al. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation2013,5:29 http://biomedcentral.com/2052-1847/5/29

Sex-related differences in swim performance have been investigated for freestyle swimmers over distances of 50 m to 1,500 m [3,10-12], for swimmers in long-distance tri- athlons [13,14], and for open-water ultra-endurance swim- mers [6], but no previous study examined sex-related differences for other styles of swimming. However, there is indirect evidence that the sex-related difference is smaller in breaststroke than in freestyle swimming.

Active drag coefficient (C

), a measure of technique and performance, was lower for faster swimmers [15].

Havriluk [16] found that C

was similar for men and women in freestyle swimming, but that women had a significantly lower C

than men in breaststroke. There- fore, the greater power of men, which allows them to outperform women in freestyle swimming, might not provide such a great advantage in breaststroke.

The age of peak performance for a particular swim- ming style, rather than the age-related performance de- cline is of interest to athletes and coaches in order to estimate when performance starts to dwindle for the particular swimming style. With this knowledge swim- mers and their coaches are able to focus on the optimal swimming style in the swimmers age group by tailoring the training program and organizing an appropriate competition schedule.

The age of peak performance seemed to have been rela- tively stable over time in some sports. For example, the age of Olympic gold medal winners of the men ’ s 100 m dash remained remarkably constant from 1896 to 1980 [3]. However, the age of peak performance can vary signifi- cantly with event and between sexes. For example, Berthe- lot et al. [17] found that peak performance in freestyle swimming was achieved at ~18 years of age for 1,500 m race distances, compared to ~23 years for 50 m distances.

Schulz and Curnow [3] analysed performance of Olympic freestyle swimmers from 1886 to 1980, and found that women generally achieved peak performance at younger ages than men. Thus, the age of peak performance in 100 m events averaged 19.4 years for women and 21.4 years for men, while in 800 m events, peak age was 16 years for women and 20.3 years for men. However, Ta- naka and Seals [12] reported that peak performance in 1,500 m freestyle swim was achieved at 30 – 35 years for women and 25 – 40 years for men, while peak perform- ance in the 50 m freestyle swim occurred at 20 – 30 years for both sexes [12]. Inconsistent estimates of the age of peak performance for freestyle swimming might be par- tially due to the use of data from different time periods.

Several studies failed to include data for swimmers younger than 19 years [1,7,8], and therefore, might have overestimated the age of peak performance.

The aims of the present study were to (i) compare the performance of women and men in breaststroke versus freestyle swimming using data from both athletes at

national level (i.e. elite Swiss swimmers) and at inter- national level (i.e. finalists in the FINA World Swim- ming Championships), and (ii) examine the age of peak performance for top female and male swimmers at dif- ferent distances in both swimming styles. We hypothe- sized that (i) sex-related differences in performance would be smaller for breaststroke than for freestyle swimming, (ii) sex-related differences in performance would decline with increasing race distance, and (iii) the age of peak performance would be similar for breaststroke and freestyle swimming for both sexes.

Methods

Race results were analyzed for all female and male breaststroke and freestyle swimmers at national level from the Swiss high score list, and for female and male swimmers at international level from the finals in the FINA (Fédération Internationale de Natation) World Swimming Championships. Data included 50 m, 100 m, and 200 m race distances. The data were obtained from the ‘ Swiss Swimming Federation ’ (http://rankings.fsn.ch/) for the years 2000 – 2010 and from the FINA (http://

www.fina.org) for the years 2003 – 2011.

Due to the low number of participants per age group and a high variability in performance by Swiss swimmers during earlier years, analyses were limited to data from 2006 through 2010 for athletes at national level. The

‘ Swiss Swimming Federation ’ lists the annual best per- formance for each athlete, so results for each individual athlete were included only once in the same year. The FINA data used were for the top eight males and top eight females for each stroke and each distance per year.

As FINA World championships are held every other year we were able to include five consecutive events. Ul- timately, data were available for a total of 29,506 ath- letes, including 14,166 Swiss women and 14,798 Swiss men, and 240 women and 240 men at the international level. The study was approved by the Institutional Re- view Board of St. Gallen, Switzerland, and the require- ment for informed consent was waived on the basis that the study used publicly available data.

To compare data for different race distances, swim- ming times were transformed to swimming speed (m/s).

Swiss women and men were divided into ten age groups,

and the three fastest swim speeds for each distance and

year were determined for each group. Swimming speed

of the top three athletes showed no significant difference

among years (one-way ANOVA, p > 0.05), so swimming

speeds of the top fifteen athletes were pooled for each

sex/age group. From these fifteen athletes, the top three

were determined for each sex, age group, and race dis-

tance. In cases where there were fewer than three swim-

mers, that group was excluded from the analysis. The

10 – 19 year and 20 – 29 year groups consistently showed

the fastest swimming speeds, so these groups were fur- ther divided into two-year age groups, and swimming speeds of the top three athletes were determined for each sex and distance. FINA finalists were divided into two-year age groups, and swimming speeds of the top three athletes in each age group were determined for each sex and race distance. To compare sex-related dif- ference in breaststroke and freestyle swimming, the fast- est three women and fastest three men were determined for each swimming style and race distance for Swiss and FINA athletes. Sex-related differences were calculated as the absolute value of [(performance by men) – (perform- ance by women)]/(performance by men) × 100. Sex re- lated difference was calculated for every pairing of equally placed athletes (e.g. between men and women winner, between men and women 2nd place, etc.) before calculating mean value and standard deviation of all the pairings. In order to facilitate reading all sex differences were transformed to absolute values before analysing.

Statistical analyses

Prior to statistical analyses, data for each sex/age/distance group were tested for normal distribution and homogen- eity of variances. Normal distribution was tested using the D ’ Agostino and Pearson omnibus normality test [18].

Homogeneity of variances was tested using Bartlett ’ s test.

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with subsequent Tukey-Kramer post-hoc analysis was used to determine the significance of differences between gender/age/dis- tance groups. Two-way ANOVA (age × swimming style), with subsequent Bonferroni post-hoc analysis, was used to determine the significance of the interactive effect of swimming style × age on performance. The statistical sig- nificance of differences between male and female athletes for each swimming style was determined using Student ’ s t-test. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 19, IBM SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) and GraphPad Prism (Version 5, GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). Significance was accepted at p ≤ 0.05 (two- tailed for t-tests). Results reported in the text and figures are means ± standard deviation (SD).

Results

Sex-related differences in peak swimming speed

In both Swiss and FINA results, men showed consistently faster peak swimming speeds than women (p < 0.01), (Table 1). The sex-related difference in peak swimming speed between the top three Swiss women and men was significantly greater for freestyle swimming than breast- stroke at all distances (p < 0.01 for 50 m, p < 0.001 for 100 m, p < 0.05 for 200 m) (Figure 1). In the FINA results, however, sex-related differences did not differ significantly between freestyle and breaststroke (p > 0.05 for all dis- tances) (Figure 2). Both Swiss and FINA data showed a

significant decrease in sex-related differences for freestyle and breaststroke with increasing race distance: 12.4 ± 0.8%

for 50 m vs. 10.0 ± 1.1% for 200 m in Swiss breaststroke swimmers; 11.4 ± 0.2% for 50 m vs. 9.8 ± 0.3% for 200 m in FINA breaststroke swimmers; 14.8 ± 0.3% for 50 m vs.

12.8 ± 0.8% for 200 m in Swiss freestyle swimmers; 11.3 ± 0.1% for 50 m vs. 10.0 ± 0.3% for 200 m in FINA freestyle swimmers (p < 0.05 in each case).

The age of peak swimming performance

The overall age of participants at national and inter- national level was at 15.1 ± 3.4 years, whereas the mean age at national competition level was at 14.9 ± 3.2 years and at international level was at 23.3 ± 3.5 years. When Swiss swimmers were categorized into ten-year age groups, peak swimming performance by women and men in both freestyle and breaststroke swimmers for all distances consistently occurred in the 10 – 19 years and 20 – 29 years groups (Figure 3). In the 50 m freestyle, swimming speeds of women in the 30 – 39 years group were similar to those of the two younger groups. The interactive effect of age × swimming style on perform- ance was highly significant (p < 0.001 for all distances).

When the 10 – 19 years and 20 – 29 years groups were broken down into two-year intervals, the age of peak swimming performance was two years younger in breast- stroke than in freestyle swimming for Swiss women (18.5 years vs. 20.5 years, respectively) (Figure 4; Table 2) and for FINA women (22.5 years vs. 24.5 years, respect- ively) (Figure 5; Table 2). Swiss men achieved peak swimming speed five years earlier in breaststroke than in freestyle swimming (18.5 years vs. 23.8 years, respect- ively). The difference for FINA men was only two years (24.5 years for breaststroke vs. 26.5 years for freestyle).

The age of peak swimming performance was on average four years older on average for FINA women than for

breaststroke and freestyle swimmers in Swiss and FINA competitions during 2006-2010

Level Top Swiss swimmers FINA finalists Stroke Breaststroke Freestyle Breaststroke Freestyle

(m/s) (m/s) (m/s) (m/s)

Men

50 m 1.79 ± 0.01 2.25 ± 0.03 1.87 ± 0.01 2.36 ± 0.01 100 m 1.60 ± 0.02 2.04 ± 0.02 1.71 ± 0.00 2.12 ± 0.01 200 m 1.47 ± 0.02 1.87 ± 0.02 1.57 ± 0.00 1.94 ± 0.02 Women

50 m 1.55 ± 0.01 1.92 ± 0.02 1.66 ± 0.00 2.10 ± 0.01 100 m 1.34 ± 0.01 1.77 ± 0.01 1.54 ± 0.01 1.90 ± 0.02 200 m 1.33 ± 0.03 1.64 ± 0.01 1.41 ± 0.00 1.75 ± 0.02 Results are mean ± SD.

Wolfrumet al. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation2013,5:29 Page 3 of 10

http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/5/1/29

Swiss women irrespective of swimming style (Table 2).

Peak swimming performance was achieved six years later in breaststroke and approximately three years later in freestyle for FINA men compared to Swiss men.

The age of swimming peak performance in breast- stroke and freestyle for Swiss and FINA men decreased

significantly with increasing race distance, as did the age of peak swimming performance in freestyle for FINA women (Figures 4 and 5; Table 2). However, race dis- tance did not significantly affect the age of peak per- formance in either swimming style for Swiss women, or for FINA women swimming breaststroke.

0 5 10 15 20

Freestyle 50m

Breaststroke 50m Freestyle 100m Freestyle 200m

Breaststroke 100m Breaststroke 200m P < 0.01

P < 0.001 P < 0.05

Sex-related Difference (%)

Figure 1Sex-related difference in swimming speed at national level per swimming style and distance.P-values indicate significant differences between sex differences of different swimming styles over the same distance. Mean ± SD.

0 5 10 15

Freestyle 50m

Breaststroke 50m Freestyle 100m Freestyle 200m

Breaststroke 100m Breaststroke 200m P > 0.05

P > 0.05

P > 0.05

Sex-related Difference (%)

Figure 2Sex-related difference in swimming speed at international level per swimming style and distance.P-values indicate significant differences between sex differences of different swimming styles over the same distance. Mean ± SD.

50m Women

0-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 0.6

0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3

NS

A B

C D

E F

Freestyle Breaststroke

NS

Age Group (Years)

Swim Speed (m/s)

0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3

Age Group (Years)

Swim Speed (m/s)

50m Men

NS NS

0-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79

0-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 0.6

0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3

Age Group (Years)

Swim Speed (m/s)

0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3

Age Group (Years)

Swim Speed (m/s)

0-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79

0-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 0.6

0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3

Age Group (Years)

Swim Speed (m/s)

0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3

Age Group (Years)

Swim Speed (m/s)

0-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 100m Women

NS NS

100m Men

NS NS

200m Women

NS NS

200m Men

NS NS

Figure 3Swimming speed at national level of women (Panels A, C, E) and men (Panels B, D, F) breaststroke (grey, filled circle) and freestyle (empty circle) swimmers between 2006 and 2010 per 10-year age group and race distance for 50 m (Panels A, B), 100 m (Panels C, D), and 200 m (Panel E, F).Arrow denotes the age group with the numeric fastest swimming speed. Age groups with no significant difference in swimming speed are indicated by a rectangle and marked with“NS”. Mean ± SD.

Wolfrumet al. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation2013,5:29 Page 5 of 10

http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/5/1/29

Discussion

The main findings of the present study were, firstly, that the sex-related difference in swimming speed was

significantly greater for freestyle than for breaststroke over 50 m, 100 m, and 200 m race distances for Swiss swimmers, but not for FINA finalists. Secondly, the sex-

50m Women

10-11 12-13 14-15 16-17 18-19 20-21 22-23 24-25 26-27 1.0

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3

NS

A B

C D

E F

Breaststroke Freestyle

NS

28-29 Age Group (Years)

Swim Speed (m/s)

10-11 12-13 14-15 16-17 18-19 20-21 22-23 24-25 26-27 1.0

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3

28-29 Age Group (Years)

Swim Speed (m/s)

10-11 12-13 14-15 16-17 18-19 20-21 22-23 24-25 26-27 1.0

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3

28-29 Age Group (Years)

Swim Speed (m/s)

10-11 12-13 14-15 16-17 18-19 20-21 22-23 24-25 26-27 1.0

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3

28-29 Age Group (Years)

Swim Speed (m/s)

10-11 12-13 14-15 16-17 18-19 20-21 22-23 24-25 26-27 1.0

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3

28-29 Age Group (Years)

Swim Speed (m/s)

10-11 12-13 14-15 16-17 18-19 20-21 22-23 24-25 26-27 1.0

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3

28-29 Age Group (Years)

Swim Speed (m/s)

50m Men

NS NS

100m Women

NS NS

100m Men

NS NS

200m Women

NS NS

200m Men

NS NS

Figure 4Swimming speed at national level of women (Panels A, C, E) and men (Panels B, D, F) breaststroke (grey, filled circle) and freestyle (empty circle) swimmers between 2006 and 2010 per 2-year age group and race distance for athletes between 10 and 29 years for 50 m (Panel A, B), 100 m (Panel C, D), and 200 m (Panel E, F).Arrow denotes the age group with the numeric fastest swimming speed. Age groups with no significant difference in swimming speed are indicated by a rectangle and marked with“NS”. Mean ± SD.

related difference for both freestyle and breaststroke swimming speeds decreased significantly with increasing race distance for Swiss and FINA athletes. Thirdly, race distance did not affect the age of peak swimming per- formance by women in breaststroke, but the age of peak performance was four years older for FINA women than for Swiss women. Men achieved peak swimming per- formance in breaststroke at younger ages for longer race distances, and the age of peak swimming performance was six years older for FINA men than for Swiss men.

Fourthly, in freestyle swimming, race distance did not affect the age of peak swimming performance for Swiss women, but the age of peak swimming performance de- creased with increasing race distance for Swiss men and for both sexes at the FINA World Championships.

Due to the observational and cross-sectional study de- sign interpretation of present results is limited to some extent. Furthermore, possible influences of anthropo- metric, biomechanical and physiological measures could not be considered [19-21]. However, this drawback is compensated for by the large study population providing sufficient power for the statistical analyses.

The sex-related differences in peak swimming speed

Results for elite Swiss swimmers supported the hypoth- esis that sex-related differences in peak swimming per- formance were smaller for breaststroke than for freestyle swimming. This finding can be partly attributed to the biomechanics of the swimming styles, particularly the front crawl, which is the fastest technique and typically used for freestyle swimming [20]. At high swimming speeds, women have a higher stroke rate and shorter stroke length than men, resulting in a poorer perform- ance, and this effect is more pronounced in the front crawl than in breaststroke [22]. Furthermore, Sánchez [23] found that men have a higher stroke index (SI) than

women, and that the SI is higher in freestyle than in breaststroke, which could translate into a higher swim- ming efficiency for women in breaststroke swimming.

Indeed, Havriluk [16] found that women have a higher level of technical efficiency than men in breaststroke swimming, relative to the sex-related difference in free- style swimming. Sex-related differences in body drag could also affect performance differences between swim- ming styles. Breaststroke is the swimming style with the greatest body drag, while freestyle has the least drag [24]. Female swimmers have a lower degree of body drag than men [25,26], and should have a greater gender advantage in breaststroke than in freestyle swimming.

Nevertheless, women lack the absolute power to achieve comparable performance times [27] and consistently underperform men in both freestyle and breaststroke.

This might be especially important in short races, where anaerobic capacity and upper extremity muscle power are most influential.

In contrast to the Swiss data, the FINA data did not support the hypothesis that sex-related differences are smaller for breaststroke than for freestyle swimming highlighting the fact that the performance difference be- tween men and women is not solely of sex-related na- ture. Different skill levels at national and international level must also be taken into account. This is further supported by studies of performance determining fac- tors, like stroke rate, arm lag time, and simultaneous arm-leg propulsion time [28]. These factors differ not only with sex but also with performance level and event.

FINA competitors represent a much larger pool of elite athletes than the Swiss pool and have greater opportun- ities for training, particularly women. Top FINA women might be sufficiently stronger freestyle swimmers than top Swiss women to close the gender gap to some ex- tent. In fact, the sex-related difference in freestyle swim- ming was smaller for FINA athletes in 50 m races than for Swiss athletes in 200 m races (10.3% vs. 12.4%, re- spectively). At international women have the same ac- cess to swimming training compared to men, which leads to a higher training load compared to national level. Mujika et al. [29] described a positive correlation of training load on performance in competitive swim- ming which might explain this circumstances [30].

Data for both Swiss and international swimmers sup- ported the hypothesis that sex-related differences in both breaststroke and freestyle decline with increasing race distance. This result confirmed previous findings of Tanaka and Seals [12], who concluded from freestyle records that women swim more efficiently than men, and so show relative improvement in performance as race distance increases. The more economic swimming in women has been attributed to smaller body size, which reduces drag, as well as shorter legs, a greater

ten breaststroke and freestyle swimmers in Swiss and FINA competitions during the 2006-2010

Level Top Swiss swimmers FINA finalists Stroke Breaststroke Freestyle Breaststroke Freestyle

(years) (years) (years) (years)

Men

50 m 20-21 26-27 26-27 28-29

100 m 18-19 22-23 26-27 28-29

200 m 16-17 22-23 20-21 22-23

Women

50 m 18-19 20-21 22-23 26-27

100 m 18-19 20-21 22-23 24-25

200 m 18-19 20-21 22-23 22-23

Results represent the age group with the fastest swimming speed in years.

Wolfrumet al. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation2013,5:29 Page 7 of 10

http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/5/1/29

50m Women

16-17 18-19 20-21 22-23 24-25 26-27 28-29 1.2

1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5

NS

A B

C D

E F

Breaststroke Freestyle

NS

Age Group (Years)

Swim Speed (m/s)

16-17 18-19 20-21 22-23 24-25 26-27 28-29 1.2

1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5

Age Group (Years)

Swim Speed (m/s)

16-17 18-19 20-21 22-23 24-25 26-27 28-29 1.2

1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5

Age Group (Years)

Swim Speed (m/s)

16-17 18-19 20-21 22-23 24-25 26-27 28-29 1.2

1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5

Age Group (Years)

Swim Speed (m/s)

16-17 18-19 20-21 22-23 24-25 26-27 28-29 1.2

1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5

Age Group (Years)

Swim Speed (m/s)

16-17 18-19 20-21 22-23 24-25 26-27 28-29 1.2

1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5

Age Group (Years)

Swim Speed (m/s)

50m Men

NS NS

100m Women

NS NS

100m Men

NS NS

200m Women

NS NS

NS

200m Men

NS NS

Figure 5Swimming speed at international level of women (Panels A, C, E) and men (Panels B, D, F) breaststroke (grey, filled circle) and freestyle (empty circle) swimmers between 2003 and 2011 per 2-year age group and race distance for athletes between 10 and 29 years for 50 m (Panel A, B), 100 m (Panel C, D), and 200 m (Panel E, F).Arrow denotes the age group with the numeric fastest swimming speed. Age groups with no significant difference in swimming speed are indicated by a rectangle and marked with“NS”. Mean ± SD.

percentage of body fat, and lower density, which results in a more horizontal and streamlined position [8,9,12].

The age of peak swimming performance

Results of the present study did not support the hypoth- esis that the age of peak swimming performance is simi- lar for breaststroke and freestyle swimming. Both Swiss and international women and men exhibited peak swim- ming performance at younger ages in breaststroke than in freestyle events. However, when 10-year age classes were used to analyse the data, this difference was not seen showing that the use of the finest possible age scale is important to detecting such differences.

Both Swiss and FINA data corroborated previous find- ings that, in freestyle swimming over distances of 50 m to 1,500 m, women generally achieve their peak swimming performance at younger ages than men [3]. Earlier matur- ation and puberty in women [31,32] account at least partly for this difference. Maximal increases in bone width, mineral content, and density occur earlier in women than in men [33]. The growth pattern of metacarpal bones also shows a two-year difference between sexes [31]. Lean body mass, which primarily reflects muscle mass, begins to increase during early puberty in both sexes, but females gain more fat-free mass than males [34]. Fat mass increases more during later puberty in women than in men [32], which might increase swim- ming efficiency, as mentioned previously.

One exception to the relatively consistent sex-related difference in the age of peak performance was in the 200 m breaststroke. Based on the age group with the nu- meric fastest swim, both Swiss and FINA men achieved their peak swimming speed at a younger age than women.

However, the reason for that finding remains unclear and warrants further investigation. With regard to the statis- tical power of the underlying analysis we consider this finding rather incidental, in particular as there is no obvi- ous physiological explanation behind.

Top female and male athletes in the FINA World Championships were 4 – 6 years older in breaststroke and 3 – 4 years older in freestyle than top Swiss swimmers. This difference can be explained by the higher performance re- quired to successfully compete at international level. Skills and experience that take years of high training load are usually required to close the performance gap between na- tional and international levels, and achieve qualification times for international events [30].

Finally, results of the present study showed that the age of peak swimming performance by women in breaststroke and freestyle swimming was independent of race distance in the 50 m to 200 m range. Schulz and Curnow [3] found peak swimming performance for women in 100 m free- style events at about the same age (19.4 years) as the present study, but at a younger age (17.6 years) for 400 m

races [9]. In contrast, Tanaka and Seals [12] found that women achieved their fastest swimming times for longer freestyle distances (1,500 m) at 30 – 35 years, and short dis- tances (50 m) at 20 – 30 years [1]. However, Tanaka and Seals excluded the 10 – 19 years age group from their ana- lysis, and Schulz and Curnow [3] included rather old data in theirs. The present study did not include distances greater than 200 m, so further study is needed to deter- mine the actual age of peak performance for long freestyle and breaststroke races.

Conclusions

The present study found greater sex-related differences in peak swimming performance in freestyle than in breaststroke for top Swiss swimmers, but not for FINA finalists. The sex-related difference decreased with in- creasing race distance for both swimming styles in both groups. Women consistently achieved peak swimming speed at younger ages than men. Further studies are re- quired to better understand why the age of peak swim- ming performance differs between breaststroke and freestyle, and to examine sex-related differences in other swimming styles.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’contributions

All authors have been involved in collecting data, writing, drafting, and revising the manuscript. MW interpreted the data, drafted, and revised the manuscript. BK conceived, designed, coordinated the study, and revised the manuscript. CAR carried out the data collection, statistical analysis, and interpretation. TR participated in the study design and revised the manuscript critically for intellectual content. RL participated in designing and coordinating the study, and revised the manuscript critically. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Author details

1Institute of General Practice and for Health Services Research, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.²Cardiovascular Center Cardiology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.³Gesundheitszentrum St. Gallen, Vadianstrasse 26, St. Gallen 9001, Switzerland.⁴INSERM U1093, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France.

Received: 10 April 2013 Accepted: 13 December 2013 Published: 19 December 2013

References

1. Cheuvront SN, Carter R, Deruisseau KC, Moffatt RJ:Running performance differences between men and women: An update.Sports Med2005, 35:1017–1024.

2. Whyte GP, George K, Sharma S, Firoozi S, Stephens N,et al:The upper limit of physiological cardiac hypertrophy in elite male and female athletes:

The British experience.Eur J Appl Physiol2004,92:592–597.

3. Schulz R, Curnow C:Peak performance and age among superathletes:

Track and field, swimming, baseball, tennis, and golf.J Gerontol1988, 43:P113–P120.

4. Tanaka H, Seals DR:Endurance exercise performance in Masters athletes:

age-associated changes and underlying physiological mechanisms.

J Physiol2008,568:55–63.

5. Tanaka H:The battle of the sexes in sports.Lancet2002,360:92.

6. Eichenberger E, Knechtle B, Knechtle P, Rust CA, Rosemann T,et al:Best performances by men and women open-water swimmers during the

Wolfrumet al. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation2013,5:29 Page 9 of 10

http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/5/1/29

‘English Channel Swim’from 1900 to 2010.J Sports Sci2012, 30:1295–1301.

7. Young M:Longest non-stop ocean swim.InGuinness World Records.New York: Guinnes World Records; 2001:27.

8. Pendergast DR, Di Prampero PE, Craig AB Jr, Wilson DR, Rennie DW:

Quantitative analysis of the front crawl in men and women.

J Appl Physiol1977,43:475–479.

9. Lavoie JM, Montpetit RR:Applied physiology of swimming.Sports Med1986, 3:165–189.

10. Donato AJ, Tench K, Glueck DH, Seals DR, Eskurza I,et al:Declines in physiological functional capacity with age: A longitudinal study in peak swimming performance.J Appl Physiol2003,94:764–769.

11. Fairbrother JT:Age-related changes in top-ten men’s U.S. Masters 50-m freestyle swim times as a function of finishing place.Percept Mot Skills 2007,105:1289–1293.

12. Tanaka H, Seals DR:Age and gender interactions in physiological functional capacity: Insight from swimming performance.J Appl Physiol 1997,82:846–851.

13. Lepers R:Analysis of Hawaii ironman performances in elite triathletes from 1981 to 2007.Med Sci Sports Exerc2008,40:1828–1834.

14. Lepers R, Maffiuletti NA:Age and gender interactions in ultraendurance performance: Insight from the triathlon.Med Sci Sports Exerc2011, 43:134–139.

15. Havriluk R:Performance level differences in swimming drag coefficient.

InProceedings of the VIIth IOC Olympic World Congress on Sport Sciences: 7- 11 October 2003.Athens: Organising Committee for the Olympic Games Athens; 2004.

16. Havriluk R:Performance level differences in swimming: relative contributions of strength and technique.InProceedings of the XIth International Symposium for Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming: 16-19 June 2010; Oslo.Edited by Kjendlie P, Stallman R, Cabri J. Oslo: Norwegian School of Sport Science; 2010:321–323.

17. Berthelot G, Len S, Hellard P, Tafflet M, Guillaume M,et al:Exponential growth combined with exponential decline explains lifetime performance evolution in individual and human species.Age (Dordr) 2012,34:1001–1009.

18. D’Agostino R:Tests for normal distribution.InIn Goodness-of-fit techniques.

Edited by D’Agostino R, Stepenes M. New York: Marcel Dekker;

1986:367–390.

19. Kukolj M, Ropret R, Ugarkovic D, Jaric S:Anthropometric, strength, and power predictors of sprinting performance.J Sports Med Phys Fitness1999, 39:120–122.

20. Lätt E, Jürimäe T:Physiological, biomechanical and anthropometrical predictors of sprint swimming performance in adolescent swimmers.

J Sports Sci Med2010,9:398–404.

21. Zampagni ML, Casino D, Benelli P, Visani A, Marcacci M,et al:

Anthropometric and strength variables to predict freestyle performance times in elite master swimmers.J Strength Cond Res2008,22:1298–1307.

22. Psycharakis SG, Cooke CB, Paradisis GP, O’Hara J, Phillips G:Analysis of selected kinematic and physiological performance determinants during incremental testing in elite swimmers.J Strength Cond Res2008, 22:951–957.

23. Sánchez J:Stroke index values according to level, gender, swimming style and event race distance.InProceedings of the XX International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports: 1-5 July 2002.Edited by Gianikellis KE.

Cáceres, Spain; 2002:56–59.

24. White JC:The relationship between drag forces and velocity for the four competitive swimming strokes.Med Sci Sports Exerc2004,36:S9.

25. Toussaint HM, de Groot G, Savelberg HH, Vervoorn K, Hollander AP,et al:

Active drag related to velocity in male and female swimmers.J Biomech 1988,21:435–438.

26. Hinrichs RN:The effect of stroke length on active drag in swimming.http://

www.asbweb.org/conferences/2007/257.pdf.

27. Dutto D, Cappaert JM:Biomechanical and physiological differences between males and females during freestyle swimming.Med Sci Sports Exerc1994,26, SA1098.

28. Takagi H, Sugimoto S, Nishijima N, Wilson B:Differences in stroke phases, arm-leg coordination and velocity fluctuation due to event, gender and performance level in breaststroke.Sports Biomech2004,3:15–27.

29. Mujika I:The influence of training characteristics and tapering on the adaptation in highly trained individuals: A review.Int J Sports Med1998, 19:439–446.

30. Mujika I, Chatard JC, Busso T, Geyssant A, Barale F,et al:Effects of training on performance in competitive swimming.Can J Appl Physiol1995, 20:395–406.

31. Martin DD, Heckmann C, Jenni OG, Ranke MB, Binder G,et al:Metacarpal thickness, width, length and medullary diameter in children–reference curves from the First Zurich Longitudinal Study.Osteoporos Int2011, 22:1525–1536.

32. Wheeler MD:Physical changes of puberty.Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1991,20:1–14.

33. Magarey AM, Boulton TJ, Chatterton BE, Schultz C, Nordin BE,et al:Bone growth from 11 to 17 years: relationship to growth, gender and changes with pubertal status including timing of menarche.Acta Paediatr1999, 88:139–146.

34. Bitar A, Vernet J, Coudert J, Vermorel M:Longitudinal changes in body composition, physical capacities and energy expenditure in boys and girls during the onset of puberty.Eur J Nutr2000,39:157–163.

doi:10.1186/2052-1847-5-29

Cite this article as:Wolfrumet al.:Sex-related differences and age of peak performance in breaststroke versus freestyle swimming.BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation20135:29.

Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central and take full advantage of:

• Convenient online submission

• Thorough peer review

• No space constraints or color figure charges

• Immediate publication on acceptance

• Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar

• Research which is freely available for redistribution

Submit your manuscript at www.biomedcentral.com/submit