• Aucun résultat trouvé

Delta Rd%

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Delta Rd%"

Copied!
29
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Ginning: a way of measuring

its specific impact on fiber quality

Jean-Paul Gourlot*, Mamadou Togola**, Eric Gozé*, Bruno Bachelier*,

Massa Coulibaly***, and Abdoul Karim Traoré****

CIRAD (France), ** CERFITEX (Mali), ***University of Bamako (Mali), ****IER (Mali)

(2)

Seed-cotton collection => bales

2

Grower 2

Grower A

Grower B

Grower X

Grower I

Grower II

Grower n

Grower 1

Productivity & Quality depend on

Production conditions (variety, sowing date, crop management, crop protection, pests, diseases, 

weeds, soil, climate…)

(3)

Seed-cotton collection => bales

3

Grower 2

Grower A

Grower B

Grower X

Grower I

Grower II

Community seed

cotton market

Community seed cotton market

Community seed cotton market

Africatime.com

Grower n

Grower 1

Africatime.com

Productivity & Quality depend on

Production conditions + market organization…

Africatime.com

(4)

Seed-cotton collection => bales

4

Grower 2

Grower A

Grower B

Grower X

Grower I

Grower II

Community seed

cotton market

Community seed cotton market

Community seed cotton market

Africatime.com

Grower n

Grower 1

Africatime.com

Productivity & Quality depend on

Production conditions + market organization + ginning conditions…

Africatime.com

Introduction

Objectives

M & Ms

Results

Conclusion Perspectives

Source : www.intracen.org Alimentation tapis-module Cleaner Séchage Dryer Cleaner Cleaner Bale press Fibres Module feeder or telescope

(5)

Seed-cotton collection => bales

5

Grower 2

Grower A

Grower B

Grower X

Grower I

Grower II

Community seed

cotton market

Community seed cotton market

Community seed cotton market

Africatime.com

Grower n

Grower 1

Africatime.com

Productivity & Quality depend on

Production conditions + market organization + ginning conditions + characterization conditions

Africatime.com

Introduction

Objectives

M & Ms

Results

Conclusion Perspectives

Source : www.intracen.org Alimentation tapis-module Cleaner Séchage Dryer Cleaner Cleaner Bale press Fibres Module feeder or telescope

(6)

Seed‐cotton 

production

and 

marketing

Ginning

Fiber quality 

characterization

Bale lots made up according to fiber quality 

to satisfy a specific requirement of buyers in 

the textile processing industry

FIBRE

‘quality’

Fiber quality: multi-scale interaction

6

Anthony, W. S. (1977). Cotton ginners handbook (1977th ed.). Agricultural Research Service.

Anthony, W. S. (1990). A good bale of cotton: interaction of variety, harvesting and ginning. The Cotton and Oil Mill Press Columbus, E. P. et al. (1990). Maintaining cotton quality. Paper American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 1057–1065. Curley, R. G. et al. (1973). Seed-cotton. California Agriculture.

Drieling, A. et al. (2012). Guideline for Standardized Instrument Testing of Cotton. www.csitc.org Elsiddig, A. et al. (2003). Genotype-Environment Interaction. J. Agric. Sci., 12(1), 19–34.

Gérardeaux, E. et al. (2013). Positive effect of climate change on cotton in 2050 by CO2 enrichment and conservation agriculture in Cameroon. ASD, 33(3), 485–495. Pettigrew, W. T. (2008). The Effect of Higher Temperatures on Cotton Lint Yield Production and Fiber Quality. Crop Science, 48(1), 278.

(7)

Bale lots made up according to fiber quality 

to satisfy a specific requirement of buyers in 

the textile processing industry

Seed‐cotton 

production

and

marketing

Ginning

Fiber quality 

characterization

FIBRE

‘quality’

Fiber quality: multi-scale interaction

7

Characterization:

‐ Provides an overall view

‐ Results of an interaction 

How to measure the specific impact of 

one source of variability on fiber quality?

(8)

:   D

:   E

+

:   G

x

:   I

Ginning mills:

Classing characterization results

8

Rd (%)

+b ()

UHML (mm)

UI (%)

Introduction

Objectives

M & Ms

Results

Conclusion Perspectives

(9)

Ginning process: how to measure its specific

impact on fiber quality?

Management and scientific issues:

• How to trace the ginning process from fiber

characterization results (collected on fiber samples)?

• How varies the ginning impact over time?

• What is the impact of each ginning step in the process?

• How to limit negative ginning impacts at acceptable

levels?

9

(10)

Material and methods: Ginning main sequences

10

Source : www.intracen.org

Alimentation

tapis-module

Cleaner

Séchage

Dryer

Cleaner

Cleaner

Bale press

Fibres

Module feeder or telescope

Gin stand

Lint cleaning

Seed-cotton

cleaners

Lint cleaner 1

Gin stand 1

Lint cleaner 2

Gin stand 2

Lint cleaner n

Gin stand n

Seed-cotton (SC)

truck/module

Material flow

Bales

(11)

Industrial ginning mills A to M, on various given dates

Samples at each of

n consecutives bales

for each date

Characterization

in two

randomized blocks

(including controls)

F

out

Material flow

Seed-cotton

cleaners

Lint cleaner 1

Gin stand 1

Lint cleaner 2

Gin stand 2

Lint cleaner n

Gin stand n

Seed-cotton (SC)

truck/module

Bales

homogenization micro-ginning

Micro-gin R

Seed-cotton

fed by handfuls

F

out

(SC

in

Micro-ginning in randomized order

(include controls

b

)

Material and methods: Experiment 1

a

11

SC

in

a Togola M. et al. (2017). Feasibility study: A new way to check the stability of industrial ginning along the season, TRJ bTogola M. et al. (2016), Is it possible to check micro ginning fiber quality preservation performance using reference

seed-cotton materials?, WCRC6

(12)

Industrial ginning mills A to M, on various given dates

Samples at each of

n consecutives bales

for each date

Characterization

in two

randomized blocks

(including controls)

F

out

Material flow

Seed-cotton

cleaners

Lint cleaner 1

Gin stand 1

Lint cleaner 2

Gin stand 2

Lint cleaner n

Gin stand n

Seed-cotton (SC)

truck/module

Bales

homogenization micro-ginning

Micro-gin R

Seed-cotton

fed by handfuls

F

out

(SC

in

Micro-ginning in randomized order

(include controls

b

)

Material and methods: Experiment 1

a

12

SC

in

a Togola M. et al. (2017). Feasibility study: A new way to check the stability of industrial ginning along the season, TRJ bTogola M. et al. (2016), Is it possible to check micro ginning fiber quality preservation performance using reference

seed-cotton materials?, WCRC6

Introduction

Objectives

M & Ms

Results

Conclusion Perspectives

Δ

Length, color and trash

parameters measured by SITC

(13)

Solid line = F

out

Dashed line= F

out

(SC

in

Results: Experiment 1

13

Togola M. et al. (2017). Feasibility study: A new way to check the stability of industrial ginning along the season, TRJ

Introduction

Objectives

M & Ms

Results

Conclusion Perspectives

Industrial ginning mill G

(14)

Results: Experiment 1

Δ = F

out

(SC

in

) – F

out

in Rd (%)

14

Togola M. et al. (2017). Feasibility study: A new way to check the stability of industrial ginning along the season, TRJ

Introduction

Objectives

M & Ms

Results

Conclusion Perspectives

0

(15)

Results: Experiment 1

Global impact demonstrated.

Coming from which ginning stage:

SC cleaning? Ginning? Lint‐cleaning?

15

Δ = F

out

(SC

in

) – F

out

in Rd (%)

Togola M. et al. (2017). Feasibility study: A new way to check the stability of industrial ginning along the season, TRJ

(16)

Industrial ginning mills D, E, G, I on various given dates

Samples at each of

n consecutives bales

for each date

Characterization

in two

randomized blocks

(including controls)

F

in

SC

out

Seed-cotton

cleaners

Lint cleaner 1

Gin stand 1

Lint cleaner 2

Gin stand 2

Lint cleaner n

Gin stand n

Seed-cotton (SC)

truck/module

Material flow

Bales

homogenization micro-ginning

Micro-gin R

Seed-cotton

fed by handfuls

F

out

(Sc

in

F

out

(Sc

out

Micro-ginning in randomized order

(include controls)

F

out

Material and methods: Experiment 2

16

SC

in

Togola M. et al. (2017). PhD and paper under preparation for TRJ

(17)

F

in

SC

out

Seed-cotton

cleaners

Lint cleaner 1

Gin stand 1

Lint cleaner 2

Gin stand 2

Lint cleaner n

Gin stand n

Seed-cotton (SC)

truck/module

Material flow

Bales

F

out

Material and methods: calculations of quality ∆s

17

SC

in

Δ

1

Δ

2

3

)

5

= Δ

2

+ Δ

3

)

Δ

4

= Δ

1

+ Δ

2

6

= Δ

1

+ Δ

2

+ Δ

3

) = Δ of Experiment 1

Introduction

Objectives

M & Ms

Results

Conclusion Perspectives

(18)

Delt

Rd%

Industrial ginning mill D

1      2      4      1      2      4       1      2      4       1      2      4      1      2      4       1      2      4       1      2      4      

Delta

0

Results: Experiment 2

18

Delta1: SC

out

– SC

in

Delta2: F

in

– SC

out

Delta4: F

in

– SC

in

(19)

Industrial ginning mill E

Delta1: SC

out

– SC

in

Delta2: F

in

– SC

out

Delta3: F

out

– F

in

Delta6: F

out

‐ SC

in

1    2    3   6  1    2    3   6  1    2    3   6  1    2    3   6  1    2    3   6  1    2    3   6  1    2    3   6  1    2    3   6  1    2    3   6  1    2    3   6  1    2    3   6  1    2    3   6  1    2    3   6 

Delta

Delt

Rd%

0

Results: Experiment 2

19

Introduction

Objectives

M & Ms

Results

Conclusion Perspectives

(20)

Industrial ginning mill G

1   2  3  6   1   2  3  6   1   2  3  6   1   2  3   6  1   2  3   6  1   2  3   6  1   2  3   6  1   2  3   6   1   2  3  6  1 2  3   6  1   2  3   6  1   2  3   6  1   2  3   6  1   2  3   6  1   2  3   6  1   2  3   6

Delta

Delt

Rd%

0

Results: Experiment 2

20

Delta1: SC

out

– SC

in

Delta2: F

in

– SC

out

Delta3: F

out

– F

in

Delta6: F

out

‐ SC

in

(21)

Industrial ginning mill G, 13/01/2015

Delt

Rd%

0

Seed‐cotton 

cleaning

Ginning

Lint 

cleaning

76.1

75.2

74.6

76.2

Rd%:

11.3

11.2

10.9

10.8

+b:

0.54

0.45

0.70

0.45

SqrTrArea:

4.66

4.05

6.14

4.85

SqrTrCnt:

F

out

(SC

in

F

out

(SC

out

)

F

in

F

out

Results: Experiment 2

21

Introduction

Objectives

M & Ms

Results

Conclusion Perspectives

(22)

Industrial ginning mill G, 09/03/2015

Delt

Rd%

0

Seed‐cotton 

cleaning

Ginning

Lint 

cleaning

73.4

75.2

73.7

75.6

Rd%:

11.0

11.5

11.2

11.2

+b:

0.64

0.47

0.68

0.41

SqrTrArea:

5.27

4.40

5.57

4.43

SqrTrCnt:

F

out

(SC

in

F

out

(SC

out

)

F

in

F

out

Results: Experiment 2

22

Introduction

Objectives

M & Ms

Results

Conclusion Perspectives

(23)

Results: Experiment 2

23

Introduction

Objectives

M & Ms

Results

Conclusion Perspectives

Is there anything

special here (significant) …

compared to here (non significant)

(24)

Conclusion - Perspectives

Experiments conducted in industrial conditions:

• Sampling done on-line

• Micro-ginning and testing were done off-line

 Delays not allowing fast maintenance actions

Would require automated sampling and testing stations

• For lint, already exists (not all characteristics)

• For SC samples: including ginning tool in addition

24

Introduction

Objectives

M & Ms

Results

Conclusion Perspectives

(25)

Application of sampling and testing stations

25

Sampling and testing station

Material flows

Optional material flows

* Chosen at purpose

A)

Tested gin line 1

SC

in

SC

out

F

in

F

out

Micro‐ginning

Tested gin line 2

Tested gin line n

LC 1

LC 2

LC n

Seed‐cotton 

cleaning

(26)

Application of sampling and testing stations

26

Sampling and testing station

Material flows

Optional material flows

* Chosen at purpose

A)

Tested gin line 1

SC

in

SC

out

F

in

F

out

Micro‐ginning

Tested gin line 2

Tested gin line n

LC 1

LC 2

LC n

Seed‐cotton 

cleaning

B)

Seed‐cotton 

cleaning

Tested gin line 1

SC

in

SC

out

F

in

F

out

Tested gin line 2

Ref. gin line n*

LC 1

LC 2

LC n

(27)

Application of sampling and testing stations

27

Sampling and testing station

Material flows

Optional material flows

* Chosen at purpose

A)

Tested gin line 1

SC

in

SC

out

F

in

F

out

Micro‐ginning

Tested gin line 2

Tested gin line n

LC 1

LC 2

LC n

Seed‐cotton 

cleaning

B)

Seed‐cotton 

cleaning

Tested gin line 1

SC

in

SC

out

F

in

F

out

Tested gin line 2

Ref. gin line n*

LC 1

LC 2

LC n

C)

Ref. gin line 1*

SC

in

SC

out

F

in

F

out

Gin line 2

Tested gin line n*

LC 1

LC 2

LC n

Sequential tests

Seed‐cotton 

cleaning

(28)

Use of sampling and testing stations

Example of logic diagram to establish an on-line diagnosis

28

Ginning stage (process)

Samplings

+ characterizations

Contextualized results

(modules, time, ginning

stage, sample ID…)

Deltas (1 to 6)

Deltas within

limits?

Load set of limits

for each Delta

Comparison of Deltas

to limits

Display « Conform »

Display list of possible

corrective actions

no

SC

in

trashy?

Set of limits 1

Set of limits 2

no

Introduction

Objectives

M & Ms

Results

Conclusion Perspectives

yes

(29)

Ginning: a way of measuring

its specific impact on fiber quality

Jean-Paul Gourlot, Mamadou Togola, Eric Gozé, Bruno Bachelier,

Massa Coulibaly, and Abdoul Karim Traoré

Thank you for your attention

International Cotton Conference, Bremen, March 2018

Références

Documents relatifs

Indications complémentaires : Compte tenu des données disponibles, les critères de classification ne sont pas remplis Toxicité spécifique pour certains organes cibles.

Doseersysteem voor solid textiel producten (4th producten) Système de dosage pour solide lavage du linge (4ème produit).. 1 x

Limite inférieure d’explosivité Aucune donnée disponible Limite supérieure d'explosivité Aucune donnée disponible. Pression de la vapeur Aucune

Pour les cours portant le sigle GMC, vous devez rencontrer le directeur de programme de génie mécanique. Vous devez lors de cette rencontre avoir les pièces originales

Pour les cours portant le sigle GMC, vous devez rencontrer le directeur de programme de génie mécanique. Vous devez lors de cette rencontre avoir les pièces originales

Symptômes/effets après contact avec la peau : Peut provoquer une allergie cutanée.. Peut provoquer une irritation de

If irritation develops and persists, seek medical attention.. SKIN: Wash with soap

Remarque Compte tenu des données disponibles, les critères de classification ne sont pas remplis. Toxicité aiguë par pénétration cutanée (Composants) percarbonates