Almost periodic functions on groupoids
FARIDBEHROUZI(*)
ABSTRACT- In this paper we generalize the notion of almost periodic functions on groups to the corresponding notion for groupoids. We prove a number of theo- rems about almost periodic functions in this general setting. We show that the set of almost periodic functions on a groupoidG,AP(G), is a C*-subalgebra of
`1(G). We investigate some topological properties of the maximal ideal space of AP(G),b(G), and we obtain a continuous partial operation onbG. Also, we study almost periodic functions on groupoids defined by an equivalence relation on a setXand obtain a compactification ofX.
MATHEMATICSSUBJECTCLASSIFICATION(2010). 22A22.
KEYWORDS. Groupoid, almost periodic function.
1. Introduction
For a locally compact spaceX, every unital C*-subalgebra AofCb(X) induces a compactification ofX. In fact the maximal ideal space of Ais a compactification ofX, see [4]. HereCb(X) is the algebra of bounded con- tinuous complex-valued functions on locally compact spaceX. It is inter- esting to know that ifXhas further algebraic structures, which compact- ifications ofXpreserve these algebraic structures. For example, ifSis a discrete semigroup andA`1(S)Cb(S), then the algebraAinducesbS, the Stone-CÏech compactification ofS, which is a compact right topological semigroup, see [7]. Another example is the algebra of almost periodic
(*) Indirizzo dell'A.: Department of Mathematics, Alzahra University, Vanak, Tehran, Iran p.code:1993891176.
School of Mathematics, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), P.O. Box: 19395-5746, Tehran, Iran.
E-mail: behrouzif@yahoo.com
This research was in part supported by a grant from IPM (No. 90470015).
functions on a groupG. Recall that a bounded functionf on a groupGis said to be almost periodic if the set of all left translationsfLxf :x2Ggoff has compact closure in`1(G), whereLxfis defined byLxf(y)f(xy). This algebra induces the Bohr compactification ofGwhich is denoted bybG. It is proved thatbG is a compact group and there exists a homomorphism f:G!bGsuch thatf(G) is dense inbG. In fact (bG;f) is a group com- pactification forG. This compactification is the biggest compactification, in the sense that if (K;c) is another group compactification forG, then there exists a continuous homomorphismT:bG!K such that Tfc. For more details, see [1].
The notion of almost periodic functions on (R;) was created by Harald Bohr in [3]. The notion is a generalization of purely periodic functions. This notion was extended to arbitrary groups by Bochner and J. Von Neumman in [2] and thereafter this theory was extended to semigroups. For further notes on almost periodic functions see; e.g. [5] and [1].
This note serves two purposes. First, we want to generalize the defi- nition of almost periodic functions on groups to groupoids. The main dif- ficulty in carrying out this construction is that the product operation on a groupoid is partially defined and the definition of translation of a function is not trivially generalized. In Section 3, we define the translation of a function on groupoids and then we define almost periodic functions on groupoids. The second aim of this paper is to obtain a compactification for a groupoidGby showing that the set of all almost periodic functions onG, AP(G), is a C*-subalgebra of`1(G). This fact is shown in Corollary 3.5.
Also, we investigate the topological and algebraic properties of the max- imal ideal spaceAP(G). In Section 4, we examine the results in the previous section for groupoids arising from equivalence relations on a setXand in this setting we get a compactification forX.
2. Preliminaries and notations
Let X be an arbitrary set. We denote by `1(X) the set of bounded complex-valued functions on X. So, `1(X) with the pointwise operations and the norm
kfk1sup
x2Xjf(x)j
is a unital commutative C*-algebra. Let X be a Hausdorff topological space. ThenCb(X) stands for the C*-algebra of bounded continuous com-
plex-valued functions on X. We will replace Cb(X) by C(X) when X is compact.
In this paper, we are interested in compact subsets of`1(X). The fol- lowing lemma which is an easy consequence of Proposition 13.1 in [11], will be frequently applied in the sequel.
LEMMA2.1. LetCbe a subset of`1(X). Then the closure ofCin`1(X), C, is compact if and only if for anye>0there exist subsets X1;X2; ;Xn of X such that XX1[X2[ [Xn with the property that if x;y2Xj, for some1jn, thenjf(x) f(y)j<efor all f 2 C.
Here are some elementary definitions in groupoid literature. For more details, we refer the reader to [8], [9] and [10].
A groupoid is a set G endowed with a product map (x;y)7!
xy:G(2)!GwhereG(2)is a subset ofGGcalled the set of composable pairs, and an inverse mapx7!x 1:G!Gsuch that the following prop- erties hold:
(i) If (x;y)2G(2) and (y;z)2G(2), then (xy;z)2G(2);(x;yz)2G(2) and (xy)zx(yz).
(ii) (x 1) 1x, for allx2G.
(iii) For allx2G, (x;x 1)2G(2)and if (z;x)2G(2), thenz(xx 1)z.
(iv) For allx2G, (x 1;x)2G(2)and if (x;y)2G(2), then (x 1x)yy.
The maps r and d on G, defined by the formulae r(x)xx 1 and d(x)x 1x, are called the range map and the source (domain) map, respectively. A pair (x;y) is composable if and only ifr(y)d(x). The unit space G0 is defined by G0d(G)r(G). Its elements are units in the sense thatxd(x)r(x)xx. Units will usually be denoted byu;v;wwhile arbitrary elements will be denoted byx;y;z. The fibres of the range and the source maps are denoted by Gur 1(fug) and Gvd 1(fvg) re- spectively. Also foru;v2G0,GvuGu\Gv.
3. Generalization of almost periodic functions
In this section we define almost periodic functions on a groupoid G.
Since in the usual definition of almost periodic functions on groups the translations of functions play basic role, first we define translations of functions on groupoids.
DEFINITION 3.1. Suppose that u2G0, x2Gu and y2Gu. For f 2`1(G) we denote the leftx-translation and the righty-translation off, respectively, byLuxf andRuyf and we define
Luxf :Gu!C; Ruyf :Gu!C;
Luxf(t)f(xt); Ruyf(t)f(ty):
ClearlyLuxf 2`1(Gu),Ruyf 2`1(Gu).
THEOREM3.2. Let G be a groupoid and let u2G0. Then the following properties of f 2`1(G)are equivalent:
(i) fLuxf :x2Gugis compact in`1(Gu).
(ii) fRuxf :x2Gugis compact in`1(Gu).
PROOF. (i)) (ii). Suppose that fLuxf :x2Gug is compact in `1(Gu) and lete>0. By Lemma 2.1, there exist subsetsX1;X2; ;XnofGusuch that ift;t02Xj for some 1jn, then for anyx2Gu,
jLuxf(t) Luxf(t0)j<e:
Now take a fixed ti in the setXi( i1;2; ;n); hence, for anyt2Gu, there is sometj2Gusuch thattandtjare both inXj, accordingly, for any x2Gu, we have
jf(xt) f(xtj)j jLuxf(t) Luxf(tj)j<e;
and hence
kRut f Rutjfk1<e:
This argument shows that the set fRuxf :x2Gug is totally bounded in
`1(Gu). Therefore,fRuxf :x2Gugis compact in`1(Gu).
(ii))(i). The proof of this is the same as (i))(ii). p DEFINITION3.3. LetGbe a groupoid. A functionf is said to bealmost periodicfunction if for anyu2G0,fLugf :g2Gugis compact in`1(Gu).
The set of almost periodic functions onGis denoted byAP(G).
THEOREM3.4. Let G be a groupoid and let f;g2AP(G). Then (i) fg; fg;f 2AP(G)and AP(G)contains the constant functions.
(ii) Ifffng1n1is a sequence in AP(G)such that fn!f in`1(G), then f 2AP(G).
PROOF. (i) Let e>0 and let u2G0. By Lemma 2.1, there exist subsets X10;X02 ;Xn0 and X100;X002; ;Xm00 of Gu such that Gu
Sn
i1Xi0 Sn
j1Xj00and ift;t02Xi, then for anyx2Gu, jLuxf(t) Luxf(t0)j<e;
and ift;t02Xj00, then for anyx2Gu,
jLuxg(t) Luxg(t0)j<e:
Set Xi;jXi0\Xj00 (i1;2; ;nand j1;2; ;m ). Ift;t02Xi;j, then for anyx2Gu;
jLux(f g)(t) Lux(fg)(t0)j jLuxf(t) Luxf(t0)j
jLuxg(t) Luxg(t0)j
<ee2e:
Also, we have:
jLux(fg)(t) Lux(fg)(t0)j jf(xt)g(xt) f(xt0)g(xt0)j jf(xt)kLuxg(t) Luxg(xt0)j
jg(xt0)kLuxf(t) Luxf(xt0)j kfk1e kgk1e:
Therefore, by Lemma 2.1, the sets fLux(fg):x2Gug and fLux(fg):x2Gugare compact in`1(Gu).
(ii) Let e>0. Pick N2N such that for any t2G, jfN(t) f(t)j<e.
Since fN2AP(G), there exist subsets X1;X2; ;Xn of Gu such that Gu Sn
i1Xiand ift;t02Xi, then
jLuxfN(t) LuxfN(t0)j<e:
Ift;t02Xi, then we have:
jLuxf(t) Luxf(t0)j jLuxf(t) LuxfN(t)j jLuxfN(t) LuxfN(t0)j
jLuxfN(t0) Luxf(t0)j
jf(xt) fN(xt)j jLuxfN(t) LuxfN(t0)j
jfN(xt0) f(xt0)j
<eee3e:
p
COROLLARY 3.5. Let G be a groupoid. Then AP(G) is a unital C*- subalgebra of`1(G).
Let bG be the maximal ideal space of AP(G). Then bG is a compact Hausdorff topological space under the Gelfand topology and by the Gel- fand-Naimark theorem,AP(G) is isometrically *-isomorphic toC(bG). We defineW:G!bGbyW(x)(f)f(x). It is easy to see thatWis well-defined andW(G) is dense inbG.
We can easily extend the functionsLuxfandRuxf to whole ofG. For any x2G, we define
Lxf :G!C; Rxf :G!C;
Lxf(t) f(xt) t2Gd(x) 0 t2=Gd(x) (
Rxf(t) f(tx) t2Gr(x) 0 t2=Gr(x): (
Therefore, the functionsLxf andRxf are in`1(G) andLxfjGd(x) Ld(x)x f andRxfjGr(x) Rr(x)x f.
THEOREM3.6. Let G be a groupoid and let f 2AP(G). Then for any x2G, the functionsLxf andRxf are in AP(G).
PROOF. Letx02G. A straightforward verification shows that Lux(Lx0f) Lux0xf x2Gd(x0)
0 x2=Gd(x0): (
Therefore,
fLux(Lx0f):x2Gug fLux0xf :x2Gd(xu 0)g [ f0g fLuxf :x2Gug [ f0g:
Since fLuxf :x2Gug [ f0g is compact so is fLux(Lx0f):x2Gug.
Similarly, it is proved thatRxf is inAP(G). p Leth2bGand letf 2AP(G) . We define two functionsTh;f :G!C andSh;f :G!Cby
Th;f(x)h(Lxf) ; Sh;f(x)h(Rxf):
By Theorem 3.6, the functions Th;f andSh;f are well-defined and are in
`1(G).
THEOREM3.7. Let G be a groupoid and f 2AP(G).
(i) Ifh2W(Gu)for some u2G0, then Th;f 2AP(G).
(ii) Ifh2W(Gu)for some u2G0, then Sh;f 2AP(G).
PROOF. (i) Let fxaga2I be a net in Gu such that W(xa)!h. Hence, TW(xa);fjGuRuxaf RxafjGuandRxafjGuis pointwise convergent toTh;fjGu. Since the closure offRuxf :x2Gugunder the norm topology is compact, the closure of fRuxf :x2Gug under the norm topology is the same as the closure of fRuxf :x2Gug under the pointwise topology. Therefore, Th;fjGu2 fRuxf :x2Gugand henceRxafjGuis norm convergent toTh;fjGuin
`1(Gu). On the other hand, ift2=Gu, thenTh;f(t) Rxaf(t)0, thusRxaf is norm convergent toTh;f. By Theorem 3.6 and Corollary 3.5,Th;f 2AP(G).
(ii) The proof is similar to (i). p
COROLLARY 3.8. Let G be a groupoid. If u;v2G0 and u6v, then W(Gu)\W(Gv) ;.
PROOF. Leth2W(Gu)\W(Gv). Choosef 2AP(G) withh(f)1. Since v2=Gu,Th;f(v)0. LetfxagIbe a net inGvsuch thatW(xa)!h. So
Th;f(v)lim
a TW(xa);f(v)
lim
a f(xa)
lim
a W(xa)(f)h(f)1:
This is a contradiction. p
COROLLARY 3.9. Let G be a groupoid and let u2G0. Suppose that f 2AP(G).
(i) If h2W(Gu) and ha2W(Gu) with ha!h, then Tha;f !Th;f in AP(G).
(ii) If h2W(Gu) and ha2W(Gu) with ha!h, then Sha;f !Sh;f in AP(G).
PROOF. (i) By Theorem 3.7, Tha;f and Th;f are in AP(G), hence Tha;fjGu;Th;fjGu are in fRux:x2Gug. Since Tha;f is pointwise convergent toTh;f in`1(G) andfRux:x2Gugis compact, thusTha;fjGuconverges to Th;fjGu in the norm topology of`1(Gu). On the other hand, Tha;fj(GnGu)
Th;fj(GnGu) 0. Therefore,Tha;f converges toTh;f in the norm topology of AP(G).
(ii) The proof is similar to (i). p
THEOREM3.10. Let G be a groupoid andh;u2bG. LetfxagIandfybgJ be nets in Guand Gu, respectively, such thatW(xa)!handW(yb)!u. Then
lima lim
b W(xayb)lim
b lim
a W(xayb):
PROOF. Letf 2AP(G). We have:
lima lim
b W(xayb)(f)lim
a lim
b f(xayb)
lim
a lim
b W(yb)(Lxaf)
lim
a u(Lxaf)lim
a W(xa)(Tu;f)
h(Tu;f):
By Corollary 3.9 (i),TW(yb);f !Tu;f inAP(G). Therefore, h(Tu;f)lim
b h(TW(yb);f)
lim
b lim
a W(xa)(TW(yb);f)
lim
b lim
a f(xayb)
lim
b lim
a W(xayb)(f):
p COROLLARY 3.11. Let G be a groupoid. If h2W(Gu) and u2W(Gu), then
h(Tu;f)u(Sh;f):
PROOF. We have:
h(Tu;f)lim
b lim
a W(xayb)(f)
lim
b lim
a W(xa)(Rybf)
lim
b h(Rybf)lim
b W(yb)(Sh;f)
u(Sh;f):
p
For a groupoidG, set (bG)(2)0 [
u2G0
W(Gu)W(Gu); (bG)(0) [
u;v2G0
W(Gvu);
and
(bG)(2)1 [
u;v;w2G0
W(Gvu)W(Gwu):
We define an operation ``'' on (bG)(2)0 byhu(f)h(Tu;f), where (h;u)2 (bG)(2)0 .
THEOREM 3.12. Let G be a groupoid and u2G0. Then the map (h;u)7!hu:W(Gu)W(Gu)!bG is continuous.
PROOF. Let e>0, f 2AP(G) and (h0;u0)2W(Gu)W(Gu). Let V fg2bG:jg(f) h0u0(f)j<eg. By Corollary 3.9 (i), the map u7!Tu;f :W(Gu)! AP(G) is norm continuous. Therefore, there exists an open set U1 in bG containing u0 such that for any u2U1, kTu;f Tu0;fk<e=2. Let U2 fg2bG:jg(Tu0;f) h0(Tu0;f)j<e=2g. For (h;u)2U2U1,
jhu(f) h0u0(f)j jh(Tu;f) h0(Tu0;f)j
khk:kTu;f Tu0;fk jh(Tu0;f) h0(Tu0;f)j e:
LetK be a set and letK(2)be a subset ofKK. Iff 2K, we set Kf fg2K:(g;f)2K(2)g; Kf fg2K:(f;g)2K(2)g:
DEFINITION 3.13. A Jordan semigroupoid is a triple (K;K(2);), such thatKis a set,K(2)is a subset ofKKandis an operation fromK(2)toK.
Let (L;L(2);) and (L0;L0(2);0) be Jordan semigroupoids. A map T:L!L0is called homomorphism if (f;g)2L(2), then (T(f);T(g))2L0(2) andT(f g)T(f)0T(g).
THEOREM3.14. Let G be a groupoid and let(K;K(2); ?)be a Jordan semigroupoid such that K is compact Hausdorff topological space.
Suppose that
(i) For any f 2K, the map g7!gf :Kf !K and the map g7!fg:Kf !K are continuous,
(ii) c:G!K is a homomorphism such that for any u2G0, c(Gu)c(Gu)K(2).
Then there exists a unique continuous homomorphism F:bG!K such thatFWc.
PROOF. LetF2C(K). We want to show thatFc2AP(G). To do this, consider the map (t;s)7!F(c(st)):c(Gu)c(Gu)!C. By assumption, this map is separately continuous and hence the mapx7!LsF:c(Gu)! C(c(Gu)) is norm continuous; see [1, Lemma B.3]. By continuity, the set fLsF:s2c(Gu)g is a compact subset of C(c(Gu)) and hence the set fLc(x)F:x2Gughas compact closure inC(c(Gu)). So, by applying Lemma 2.1, we conclude that the set fLx(Fc):x2Gughas compact closure in
`1(Gu), as required. Then it is easy to verify that the map T:C(K)! AP(G) defined byT(F)Fc is a *-homomorphism. IfFTjbG, then F:bG!Kis continuous andFWc. For the last equality, suppose that x2G. For anyF2C(K), we have:
F(F(W(x)))W(x)(T(F))Fc(x)F(c(x)):
Therefore, FWc. Now, assume that (h;u)2W(Gu)W(Gu) for some u2G0. LetfxagIandfybgJbe nets inGu andGu, respectively, such that W(xa)!handW(yb)!u. Then
F(h)lim
a F(W(xa))lim
a c(xa):
SoF(h)2c(Gu). Similarly,F(u)2c(Gu), and hence (F(h);F(u))2c(Gu) c(Gu)K(2). Also, we have:
F(h)?F(u)lim
a lim
b F(W(xa))?F(W(yb))
lim
a lim
b c(xa)?c(yb)
lim
a lim
b c(xayb)
lim
a lim
b F(W(xayb))F(hu):
p THEOREM3.15. Suppose that G is a groupoid and(h;u)2(bG)(2)0 .
(i) Let u2(bG)(0). Then hu2W(Gv) if and only if u2W(Guv) for some u2G0.
(ii) Let h2(bG)(0). Then hu2W(Gw) if and only if h2W(Gwu) for some u2G0.
PROOF. (i) Suppose thatu2W(Guv) andfxaga2Jandfyaga2Jare nets in GuandGvu, respectively, such thatW(xa)!handW(ya)!u. Thenxaya2Gv
and hencehulim
a W(xa)W(ya)2W(Gv). Conversely, lethu2W(Gv) and u2W(Guv0). This implies thathu2W(Gv)\W(Gv0). By Corollary 3.5,vv0.
(ii) The proof is similar to (i). p
LetGbe a groupoid. Iff 2AP(G), definebf :G !Cbybf(x)f(x 1). It is easy to see thatbf 2AP(G). We extend the inverse operation `` 1'' onGto an involution on bG. If h2bG, define h 1(f)h(bf). Since fgb bfbg, h 12bGand the map h7!h 1 is continuous. Also, if h2f(Gvu), then by Theorem 3.12,h 1hvandhh 1u.
DEFINITION3.16. LetLbe a set andL(2)be a subset ofLL. An op- eration :L(2) !L is called to be associative if f;g;h2L are such that either
(i) (f;g)2L(2)and (g;h)2L(2), or (ii) (f;g)2L(2)and (fg;h)2L(2), or (iii) (g;h)2L(2)and (f;gh)2L(2)
then all (f;g);(g;h);(f g;h) and (f;gh) lie inL(2), and (fg)hf (gh):
THEOREM3.17. Let G be a groupoid. Then (i) the operation:(bG)(2)1 !bG is associative.
(ii) ifh2W(Gu), thenhuh.
(iii) ifh2(bG)(0), then(h;h 1)2(bG)(2)1 and(h;h 1)2G(0).
4. Equivalence relations as groupoids
LetXbe any set and letRbe an equivalence relation onX. Set R(2) f((x;y);(y;z)):(x;y);(y;z)2 Rg;
define (x;y)(y;z)(x;z) and define (x;y) 1(y;x). Then it is easy to check that R becomes a groupoid and it is evident that R(0) is the diagonal D f(x;x):x2Xg. Also, forx2X,
G(x;x) fxg [x]; G(x;x)[x] fxg
where [x] is used to designate the equivalence class determined byx. Two extreme cases are to be singled out. IfR XX, thenRis called the trivial groupoid onX, while ifR D, thenRis called the co-trivial groupoid onX.
Let Rbe an equivalence relation on a setX. So, f 2`1(R) is almost periodic if and only if for any x2X, the setffs:s2[x]g is compact in
`1([x]), wherefs:[x]!Cis defined byfs(t)f(s;t).
DEFINITION4.1. LetXbe any set. A functionf 2`1(XX) is called piecewise cylindrical if there exists a partitionX1;X2; ;XnforXsuch that for any 1kn;s2Xandt;t02Xkimplyf(s;t)f(s;t0). We denote the set of piecewise cylindrical functions onXXbyPC(X).
THEOREM4.2. Let X be any set and letRbe an equivalence relation on the set X. Then for any x2X, PC([x])is dense in AP(R)j[x][x].
PROOF. First, we show that PC([x]) is contained in AP(R)j[x][x]. Suppose that F2PC([x]). Thus there exists a partition X1;X2; ;Xn
for [x] such that for any s2[x] and for any 1kn the identity F(s;t)F(s;t0) holds for all t;t02Xk. If we define f0:R !C by
f0(s;t) F(s;t) (s;t)2[x][x]
0 (s;t)2= [x][x];
(
then f0j[x][x]F. We claim thatf02AP(R). Let e>0 and y2X. Con- sider subsets X1;X2; ;Xn;Xn1Xn[x]. By assumption, if t;t02Xk, then for alls2[y],jf0(s;t) f0(s;t0)j 0<e. Therefore, by Lemma 2.1 the setff0s :s2[y]g is compact in`1([y]). Thusf0 is almost periodic. Now, suppose thatf 2AP(R) and suppose thate>0. By Lemma 2.1, there exists a partitionX1;X2; ;Xnfor [x] such that ift;t02Xk for some 1kn, then for alls2[x],jf(s;t) f(s;t0)j<e. Lett12X1;t22X2; ;tn2Xnbe fixed points. Define F:[x][x]!C byF0(s;t)f(s;tk) if t2Xk. Triv- ially,F02PC([x]) and ift2Xkfor some 1kn, then
jF0(s;t) f(s;t)j jf(s;tk) f(s;t)j<e:
p LetRbe the co-trivial groupoidD. Trivially, everyf 2`1(R) is almost periodic. So,AP(R)`1(R) and hencebR bD. More generally, ifRis an equivalence relation on a setXsuch that every equivalence class ofRis finite, thenAP(R)`1(R) and hencebR bD.
THEOREM4.3. LetRbe the trivial groupoid on a set X. Then bR bXbX.
PROOF. We prove the theorem in the following steps.
Step 1. Iffxaga2J;fyaga2J;fx0aga2Jandfy0aga2Jare nets inXsuch that lima xalim
a x0a and lim
a ya lim
a y0a (the limits are taken in the bX), then lima W(xa;ya)lim
a W(x0a;y0a).
To show that lim
a W(xa;ya)lim
a W(x0a;y0a) inbR, it is enough to show that for everyf 2PC(X),
lima W(xa;ya)(f)lim
a W(x0a;y0a)(f):
Let X1;X2; ;Xn be a partition for X such that if t;t02Xk for some 1kn, then for anys2X,f(s;t)f(s;t0). By Theorem 6.5 in [6], the setsX1;X2; ;Xn(the closures are taken inbX) are open and disjoint sets, so, we can assume that there exists 1jn such that for any a2J, ya;y0a2Xj. Suppose thatxa!uinbXandtis a fixed element inXj. Define g(s)f(s;t). Thusg2`1(X) and we have:
lima W(xa;ya)(f)lim
a f(xa;ya)
lim
a f(xa;t)lim
a g(xa)
u(g):
Similarly, lim
a W(x0a;y0a)(f)u(g).
Step 2. If fW(xa;ya)ga2J and fW(x0a;y0a)ga2J are nets in bR such that lima W(xa;ya)lim
a W(x0a;y0a), then lim
a xalim
a x0aand lim
a yalim
a y0a. Letg2`1(X). By Lemma 4.2 the mapf defined byf(s;t)g(s) is an almost periodic function onR. So
lima g(xa)lim
a W(xa;ya)(f)
lim
a W(x0a;y0a)(f)
lim
a g(x0a):
Thus lim
a xalim
a x0a. By the same proof, lim
a yalim
a y0a.
Letib :X!bXbe the injection map. Therefore,bXbXis compact semigroupoid (in fact it is groupoid as trivial groupoid on bX) and
ibib:XX!bXbX is a continuous homomorphism which sat- isfies all the conditions of Theorem 3.14. So, there exists a homo- morphism c:b(XX)!bXbX such that cWibib. We show that c is an isomorphism. Let u1 and u2 be in b(XX) such that c(u1)c(u2). Letfxaga2J;fyaga2J;fx0aga2Jandfy0aga2Jbe nets inXsuch that lim
a W(xa;ya)u1 and lim
a W(x0a;y0a)u2. We have:
lima ibib(xa;ya)lim
a cW(xa;ya)
c(u1)c(u2)
lim
a cW(x0a;y0a)
lim
a ibib(x0a;y0a):
Therefore, lim
a xalim
a x0aand lim
a yalim
a y0a. Thus u1lim
a W(xa;ya)lim
a W(x0a;y0a)u2:
Now, suppose that (g1;g2)2bXbXand suppose thatfxagandfyagare nets inbXsuch thatxa!g1 andya!g2. By passing to a subsequence, we may assume thatW(xa;ya) is convergent inb(XX). LetW(xa;ya)!u.
We have:
c(u)lim
a cW(xa;ya)lim
a ibib(xa;ya)(g1;g2):
p REMARK 4.4. Let R be an equivalence relation on a set X and let bd:X!bRbe a map defined bybd(x)W(x;x). Suppose thatbX is the closure of the imageXunderbd. Then (bX;bd) is a compactification forX which is calledR-almost periodic compactification.
Acknowledgments. The authors are grateful to the referee for careful reading of the paper, and for providing several helpful suggestions for improvement in the article.
REFERENCES
[1] J. F. BERGLUND- H.D. JUNGHENN - P. MILNES: Analysis on Semigroups:
Function Spaces, Compactifications, Representations. Wiley, New York, 1989.
[2] BOCHNER - J. VON NEUMANN, Almost periodic functions in groups, Trans.
Amer. Math. Soc.37(1935), 21-50.
[3] H. BOHR,Zur Theorie der fastperiodischen Funcktionen, I, II, III, Acta Math.
45(1924), 29-127,46(1925), 101-214,47(1926), 237-281,
[4] A. BROWDER,Introduction to function algebras, W. A. Benjamin, New York, 1969.
[5] J. DIXMIER,C*-Algebras, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977.
[6] L. GILLMAN - M. JERISON, Rings of continuous functions, van Nostrand, Princeton, 1960.
[7] N. HINDMAN - D. STRAUSS, Algebra in the Stone-CÏech Compactification:
Theory and Applications, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1998.
[8] P. MUHLY,Coordinates in operator algebra, (Book in preparation).
[9] A. L. T. PATERSON, Groupoids, inverse semigroups, and their operator algebras, Progress in Mathematics, 170. BirkhaÈuser, Boston, 1999.
[10] J. RENAULT,A groupoid approach to C-algebras, Lecture Notes in Math. 793, Springer, Berlin, 1980.
[11] S. ZAIDMAN,Almost-periodic functions in abstract spaces, Research Notes in Math. 126. Pitman, Boston, 1985.
Manoscritto pervenuto in redazione il 20 novembre 2012.