• Aucun résultat trouvé

Family physician shortages: Are nurses the answer?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Family physician shortages: Are nurses the answer?"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

480

Canadian Family PhysicianLe Médecin de famille canadien Vol 54:  march • mars 2008

Vital Signs

College

Collège

Family physician shortages

Are nurses the answer?

Cal Gutkin

MD CCFP(EM) FCFP, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

T

he results of the 2007 National Physician Survey (NPS) tell a familiar story: We still don’t have enough doctors to meet the health care needs of Canadians.

Nowhere is this felt more strongly than in family practice.

The public and media response to the NPS provided fur- ther proof that the shortage of FPs remains a top concern for Canadians. Of the many interesting findings in the NPS, most media attention focused on the difficulty peo- ple have finding a family doctor. Media interviews, phone- in shows, and letters to the editor repeatedly delivered the same message: Canadians highly value and want access to a personal family doctor. To add fuel to the fire, in January 2008, CBC aired the documentary “Desperately Seeking Doctors,” in which Canadians from coast to coast spoke of how vulnerable they feel without an FP.

An obvious problem

It has been well over 3 years since the $5 million government-funded Physician Human Resource Strategy for Canada (Task Force Two) presented its final report.

It identified how inadequate systemic health human resource (HHR) planning over the past few decades left the people of this country without the doctors, nurses, and other health professionals required to meet their needs. It recommended the immediate establishment of a pan-Canadian HHR strategy to resolve this unaccept- able situation and prevent it from ever happening again.

Have governments heeded this critical recommenda- tion of the task force report? No. What has developed though is a new “wait-times industry,” where selected services and their providers compete for dollars while dozens of other services—and the patients and providers linked to them—go wanting. The meetings, task forces, and think tanks related to this wait-time process alone are consuming millions of dollars. A good portion of that money might be better spent training, recruiting, and supporting the increased numbers of doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and other health professionals needed by the people who are waiting.

A possible solution

Despite no movement toward a national HHR strat- egy, some action has taken place. Since the year 2000, first-year medical school enrolments have increased from 1500 to nearly 2500 students, and each year more

international graduates are being trained and licensed.

However, we will need at least 3000 students in each new medical class to offset the 2000 physicians retiring each year and the 35% who are burning out and reduc- ing their practices. For now, Canada remains near the bottom of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries for the numbers of medical students and practising doctors per capita.

A progressive strategy emerging across the country involves interprofessional teams, which could help our lim- ited number of FPs distribute their clinical attention more effectively. Although we need a clear understanding of the roles of each team member and more evidence of improved outcomes and patient and provider satisfaction, our College supports the potential value added when FPs work collabor- atively with other health professionals to improve access to care. Many of our members have told us that, if supported by system payment and liability plans, they would welcome the opportunity to work with nurses and nurse practitioners.

Being able to offer patients the benefits of strategically com- bined medical and nursing skills in the same practice set- ting is seen as highly advantageous for patients, particularly for preventive care and chronic disease management.

A team effort?

In October 2007, the College of Family Physicians of Canada asked government leaders to support a goal that a decade from now would see every person in Canada with a per- sonal family doctor, with 95% of this objective realized in each Canadian community by 2012. As part of this vision, the College and the Canadian Nurses Association released a conjoint Vision Statement, committing to work together to bring about a day when every Canadian would have access to a family practice setting where care would be provided by a personal family doctor and a nurse or nurse practitioner.

Achieving this will require real teamwork and honest collaboration. With our limited number of doctors and a predicted shortage of more than 100 000 nurses by 2012, we need to move toward practice models that use every doctor and nurse wisely. Independent nurse practitio- ner practices, where nurses supposedly offer the same services provided by FPs, do not meet this goal and run counter to the objectives of developing patient-centred, interprofessional care. Those in government or in the nursing community who prefer such models over true collaborative family doctor–nurse practices will have to develop them without us.

Cet article se trouve aussi en français à la page 479.

Références

Documents relatifs

Our Cancer Information Service helps people across the country by answering their questions about more than 100 different types of cancer, treatment, diagnosis, care, services

4 The Australian Journal of General Practice 5 and American Family Physician, 6 the earliest family medicine journals to provide editorial fellowships, continue to do so..

We reviewed the original Lancet case report, the columns, and Drs Zipursky and Juurlink’s article and together agreed that there were sufficient concerns about the validity of

Toward the end of 2019, leading family medicine orga- nizations such as WONCA (World Organization of Family Doctors) issued a declaration calling for family doctors of the world

3 The Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) has rec- ommended similar prophylactic treatment since 1988, but also proposed that a 2.0 mg dose of oral (PO) vitamin K administered within

I n 2015 the guidelines for the management of nau- sea and vomiting in pregnancy (NVP) developed by Motherisk and endorsed and published by the Society of Obstetricians

Soon after I began as Executive Director and Chief Executive Officer, Lynn Dunikowski, Director of the Canadian Library of Family Medicine (CLFM), informed me that she planned

It was evident from a review of the literature and consultations with nurses and key stakeholders that there is a need for novice nurses working on the surgical unit to have