• Aucun résultat trouvé

Conservation agriculture and agroecology practices to mitigate climatic variations in medium altitude in Madagascar

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Conservation agriculture and agroecology practices to mitigate climatic variations in medium altitude in Madagascar"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Oral Presentations L3.2 Climate-smart cropping systems

52

11:15

Conservation agriculture and agroecology practices to mitigate climatic

variations in medium altitude in Madagascar

Penot Eric1, Fèvre Valentin2, Flodrops Patricia2, Razafimahatratra Hanitriniaina Mamy3

1CIRAD UMR innovation, DP SPAD, DR CIRAD, BP 853, Anpandrianomby, 101 Antananarivo, Madagascar 2Agroparistech, DP SPAD, DR CIRAD, BP 853, Anpandrianomby, 101 Antananarivo, Madagascar 3FOFIFA, Apandrianomby, 101 Antananarivo, Madagascar

Conservation Agriculture (CA) has been promoted in the last 15 years in Madagascar to develop a sustainable rainfed agriculture in order to cope with low fertility upland soils, erosion, low local cropping system productivity and impact of climatic variations. We took the example of medium altitude areas (Lake Alaotra and Middle West of Vakinankatra province). If climate change is not proven in these areas, climatic variations are very high (in lake Alaotra for instance, rainfall varies from 500 to 1600 mm/year and rainy season from 2 to 5 months) and erratic rainfall patterns at the beginning of the rainy season do induce serous risks of crop failure.

In CA systems, the mulch resulting from rice straw, other plant residue and associated dedicated plant residues contributes to better cropping systems resilience and helps to mitigate climatic variations. If a limited number of farmers have effectively adopted in the long run CA, most farmers have developed intermediate cropping systems between conventional and CA that fit their own constraints and strategies, leading to a wide spread of some agroecological practices. But are such practices sufficient to cope with climate variations? Most farmers have to deal with the following trade-off: better resilience of upland cropping systems through CA practices (including Mulching) vs better immediate economic output. Changing the paradigm from conventional to conservation agriculture implies some risks and not only technical risks of crop failure. A typology of behavior is presented to identify farmers’ strategies on risks in a world of multiple uncertainties (climatic, economic, and socio-political).

Références

Documents relatifs

Following to the Sustainable Rural Livelihood framework, we propose to proxy the diverse livelihood assets like access to credit and income per capita (financial

The plots abandoned in majority (52 out of the 88 oldest plots) are those established in 2005 (among the oldest) (table 1) as it has been the first year of the project

In the course of our breeding program, we also compare every year a higher number of upland rice varieties (around fifty) on different cropping systems (CT versus CA) in

The pros and cons of CA adoption could be seen through opportunities for farmers to improve their cropping systems, partially or even through complete adoption

The present study focuses on quantification of abovegroundand root biomass of plants used in rotations to help soil carbon budget in the aim of comparing conservation

First and most advanced works focused on rain-fed upland agriculture with maize, cassava, soybean and (upland) rice as principal crops; more recently, complementary approaches put

The second scenario in based on both fertilizer price increase and rice price as frequently observed in the least 10 years (Figure 3).Where shocks are cumulative, once again the

These scenarios are changed only at the cropping system level of tanety and baiboho (crop rotations, std CTP, yields). Olympe allows the comparison between CA