• Aucun résultat trouvé

Numerical modeling of cartilage growth under mechanical stresses. Mechanical and biological analysis on in vitro «micropellet» model

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Numerical modeling of cartilage growth under mechanical stresses. Mechanical and biological analysis on in vitro «micropellet» model"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01772220

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01772220

Submitted on 20 Apr 2018

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Numerical modeling of cartilage growth under

mechanical stresses. Mechanical and biological analysis on in vitro “micropellet” model

Marie Maumus, Gilles Dusfour, S. Lefloch, Dominique Ambard, Christian Jorgensen, Danièle Noël, Patrick Cañadas

To cite this version:

Marie Maumus, Gilles Dusfour, S. Lefloch, Dominique Ambard, Christian Jorgensen, et al.. Numerical modeling of cartilage growth under mechanical stresses. Mechanical and biological analysis on in vitro “micropellet” model. 5èmes journées scientifique du Labex Numev, Oct 2016, Montpellier, France. 2016. �hal-01772220�

(2)

LABEX

NUMEV

Digital and Hardware Solutions, Environmental and Organic Life Modeling

Generic Topic Modeling

Key words: Cartilage, growth, mechanical stresses, micropellet, mechanotransduction

SUMMARY: The project concerns the modeling of the growth of new-cartilage samples generated from mesenchymal stem cells. These samples reproduce the embryonic formation of cartilage. We first propose to set up a device for analysing the mechanical features of neocartilage samples and then to investigate the role of mechanical stresses on the extra-cellular matrix production. This approach aims at evaluating and classifying the influence of mechanical stresses in respect of the growth factors on growth process.

M. Maumus 1, 2 , G. Dusfour 1 , S. Le Floc'h 1 , D. Ambard 1 , C. Jorgensen 2 , D. Noël 2 , P. Cañadas 1 1

LMGC, UMR 5508 Université de Montpellier / CNRS

2

IRMB, UMR 1183 Université de Montpellier / CHU Montpellier / INSERM

Numerical modeling of cartilage growth under mechanical stresses.

Mechanical and biological analysis on in vitro «micropellet» model.

DESCRIPTION: Cartilages are living tissues whose growth is a long process of which the exact role of mechanical stresses is misunderstood. This topic is crucial in the aim to improve current therapies devoted to regenerate new cartilage secondary to diseases such as degenerative osteoarthritis. Indeed, even if biologists know how to use growth factors to generate new cartilage, the resulting samples have mechanical properties that do not reach those of physiological mature cartilage. Moreover, there is no published study concerning the control of the mechanical environment during cartilage growth.

The present project aims at studying and modeling 1) the generation and growth of cartilage after differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) in micropellet culture that reproduces embryonic cartilage formation and 2) the role of mechanical stresses on their growth by evaluating extracellular matrix production.

A first step of this study concerns the biomechanical characterization of micropellets by using both biological and mechanical analysis techniques. To do so, the IRMB team differentiates MSC toward cartilage using the micropellet culture system and a chondrogenic medium containing TGFβ3 for 3 weeks (Fig. 1). Afterwards, the micropellets are mechanically characterised at the LMGC by harmonic compression tests at 1 Hz associated to video image correlation (Fig. 2). Then, immunohistochemical characterization is performed to reveal the quality of the produced cartilaginous extracellular matrix.

21 days 250.000 MSC/tubes Centrifugation 300g, 5min Chondrogenic medium Day 21 Day 0 Figure 1 (A) MSC in culture (B) Micropellets with (right) or without (left) TGFβ3 Figure 2: Compression device A B PROSPECT:

Next step is to follow and analyse the temporal evolution of both the gene expression and the rigidity of micropellets. After that, we want to submit the cultivated micropellets to mechanical loading during the 21 days of chondrogenic differentiation in the aim to determine the role of mechanical stresses regardless the growth factors used and to improve MSC differentiation into cartilage using the micropellet technique. To do so, a specific microfluidic-based device is under design process (Fig. 5).

Figure 5: Scheme of principle of the microfluidic-based device that will be used to

submit micropellets to

mechanical loading while being cultivated.

A B

RESULTS:

Figure 3: Micropellet diameter (mm) (A), collagen II staining (B) and specific chondrogenic marker gene expression (C) after 21 days of chondrogenic differentiation.

Molecular characterization of micropellets

CONCLUSION:

- MSC cultured with TFGβ3 differentiate into cartilage as shown by the larger size of the

micropellets, the expression of molecular markers specific for articular cartilage and their higher rigidity. These results validate the usefulness of the device we developed for measuring the mechanical characteristics of these very small size neotissue samples.

- Moreover, the mean value of Young's modulus of TGFβ3-micropellets is 320 kPa, in

between that of immature fibrocartilage (~ 110 kPa) and of mature cartilage (~ 1-4 MPa). This underlines the limitations of the micropellet culture system and suggests that the device could be of high interest for evaluating different combinations of cells and factors to enhance cartilage formation with proper mechanical features.

Figure 4: Micropellet under compression test and displacement field (A), and corresponding mean Young’s modulus for 8 micropellets by culture condition (with or without TGFβ3) (B)

COL 2B gene expr ession (2 -ΔCT ) 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 -TGFβ3 +TGFβ3 D21 D0 ACA N gene expr ession (2 -ΔCT ) 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 -TGFβ3 +TGFβ3 D21 D0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 SOX9 gene expr ession (2 -ΔCT ) -TGFβ3 +TGFβ3 D21 D0 HAPLN1 gene expr ession (2 -ΔCT ) 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 -TGFβ3 +TGFβ3 D21 D0 µpell et dia m et er (m m ) -TGFβ3 +TGFβ3 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 A B C -TGF β3 + TGF β3

Mechanical characterization of micropellets

Y oung' s m odulus (kPa) 0 100 200 300 400 500 -TGFβ3 +TGFβ3

Références

Documents relatifs

validated the proposed method using three different strate- gies: measuring the 3D error between a known 3D model and a 3D reconstruction, measuring the influence of silhou-

Cette méthode d’analyse biologique instantanée permet la détection précoce d’une atteinte pré-rénale, rénale et post-rénale, comme les infections urinaires,

Moreover, only a partial organ growth is required to induce residual stresses that are compatible with measured opening angle [2], suggesting that not all residual stresses induced

In this second example, the tumor is growing within the healthy tissue, which substitutes the cell culture medium in the previous case. Therefore, the initial configuration

numerous challenges going from connectivity maintenance to swarm

However, in the [Rh] –B migratory insertion mechanism the hydride initially formed in the apical position (Fig. 1, intermediate IIIB, in green) is higher in energy than all

دقتني رصانع اشقانم يسورلا عمتلمجا عاضوأ بتاكلا ةيناسنإ هتاقلاع في رثؤت و عمتلمجا في شيعت ةلعاف و ةيح.. يرصم ةرارمو هيبأ عبط نم ترذغت ةبيرغ ةيناسنإ ةيجس نع

In the case of leaf venation, this transition describes the differentiation of veins, and the collapsed state refers to the elongated vascular cells.. An analogy can be made with