• Aucun résultat trouvé

Recall that ∧0T∗M = M ×R so that Ωp(M

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Recall that ∧0T∗M = M ×R so that Ωp(M"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Exterior derivative

Let M be a smooth manifold and let Ω(M) = ⊕p≥0p(M) be the gradu- ated algebra of differential forms on M. Recall that ∧0TM = M ×R so that Ωp(M) = C(M,R). Also ∧1TM =TM =tx∈M(TxM).

Theorem.There is a unique linear map

d: Ω(M)→Ω(M) with

d(Ωp(M))⊂Ωp+1(M), such that

(1) for f ∈Ω0(M), df :M →TM is defined by dfx(v) =Txf(v);

(2) for α∈Ωp(M) and β∈Ωq(M) we have

d(α∧β) =dα∧β+ (−1)pα∧dβ

(3) d◦d= 0

(4) Restriction to opens: (dω)|U =d(ω|U);

(5) for f :M →N smooth, f(dω) = d(fω).

Proof. Unicity.

Lemma. Let d : Ω(M) → Ω(M) satisfying (1) and (2). If V ⊂ M is open, α, β ∈Ω(M) such that α|V =β|V then dα|V =dβ|V.

Proof. Take x ∈ V and f : M → R a cut-off function: Supp f ⊂ V and f ≡ 1 in a neighborhood of x. Then by the construction f(α−β) = 0, so that by linearity d(f(α−β)) = 0. Sincedcoincides with differentials of functions by(1), andfis con- stant onV, we havedfx = 0. Using (2): 0 =d(f(α−β)) =df∧(α−β)+f∧d(α−β).

Evaluating atxand using thatf(x) = 1we obtain0 = 1∧(dαx−dβx) = dαx−dβx so that dαx = dβx. Since x is arbitrary in V, we obtain the statement in the

lemma. .

Lemma⇒unicity. We’ll express everything in terms of differentials of functions and then use (1). So take x ∈ M and (U, φ) a local chart at x0, φ = (φ1, . . . φn).

Let M →R be a smooth cut-off function with Supp f ⊂ U and f ≡ 1 on an open neighborhood V with x∈V. For I ={i1, . . . ip}with i1 < . . . < ip put

d(f φ)I =d(f φ1)∧. . .∧d(f φip).

1

(2)

Write the expression in local coordinatesω|U =P

IωII. SinceωandP

If ωId(f φ)I coincide onV, by lemma the differentials are the same. So we compute:

dω =d(X

I

f ωId(f φ)I) =X

I

d(f ωI)∧d(f φ)I,

where the last equality id obtained using (2) and (3). In this way we expressed dω in terms of differentials of functions f ωI andf φij, so that we obtain unicity by (1).

Existence

We first consider the case when M = U is an open in E = Rn. Then, for ω ∈ Ωp(U) = C(U,∧pE) it makes sense to speak about Txω ∈ L(Rn,∧pE).

Then, ∀v1, . . . vp+1 ∈E define

x(v1, . . . vp+1) =

p+1

X

i=1

(−1)i+1Txω(vi)(v1, . . . ,vbi, . . . vp+1).

Then, by definition, d : Ωp(U) → Ωp+1(U) is linear, and coincides with df for f a function. We have the following properties:

1. If I ={i1, . . . ip}with i1 < . . . < ip and if f ∈C(U,R) and ω=f dxI, then dω=df ∧dxI.

In fact, note that dxI us constant on U, so that ∀x ∈ U, v ∈ E we have Tx(ω)(v) = dfx(v)dxI. Then, by definition of the product, ∀v0, . . . vp+1 ∈ E we have

x(v1, . . . , vp+1) =

p+1

X

i=1

(−1)i+1dfx(vi)dxI(v1, . . .vbi, . . . vp+1) = dfx∧dxI(v1, . . . vp+1).

2. ∀α∈Ωp(U), β ∈Ωq(U), we have

d(α∧β) = dα∧β+ (−1)pα∧dβ.

In fact, by linearity, it’s enough to check forα =f dxI (whenI is of cardinal p) andβ =gdxJ thatα∧β =dα∧β+ (−1)pα∧dβ. Indeed, by the previous property

d(α∧β) =d(f g)∧dxI∧dxJ =gdf∧dxI ∧dxJ+f dg∧dxI∧dxJ =

=df ∧dxI∧gdxJ + (−1)pf dxI∧dg∧dxJ =dα∧β+ (−1)pα∧dβ.

3. d◦d: Ωp(U)→Ωp+2(U)is a zero map.

Again, by linearity, it’s enough to consider ω = f dxI, that is similar to the previous property and we leave it as an exercise.

2

(3)

4. Similarly, using linearity and the properties of direct images, one easily sees that, ifV ⊂Rmis an open andφ:U →V smooth, then∀ω ∈Ωp(V), d(φω) = φdω. In particular,(dω)|V =d(ω|V).

Now, in the general case, ifω ∈Ω(M)we coverM by open charts and we define on the chart (U, φ)

(dω)|U(d(φ−1)(ω|U)).

3

Références

Documents relatifs

Ne croyez pas que le simple fait d'afficher un livre sur Google Recherche de Livres signifie que celui-ci peut etre utilise de quelque facon que ce soit dans le monde entier..

Thus semantic connection should replace semantic value as the principal object of semantic enquiry; and just as the semantic evaluation of a complex expression is naturally taken

These equations govern the evolution of slightly compressible uids when thermal phenomena are taken into account. The Boussinesq hypothesis

La plénitude dans le ciel, ou cercle de Gwenved ; et sans ces trois nécessités, nul ne peut être excepté Dieu. îS Trois sortes de nécessités dans

Augmented Born-Infeld equations, symmetrizable hyperbolic systems, vibrat- ing strings, singular limits, continuation principle, asymptotic expansions, energy

~ber 5 willkiirlichen Punkten des R.~ gibt es eine Gruppe yon 32 (involutorischen) Transformationen, welche auch in jeder anderen iiber irgend 6 besonderen

First introduced by Faddeev and Kashaev [7, 9], the quantum dilogarithm G b (x) and its variants S b (x) and g b (x) play a crucial role in the study of positive representations

We prove that arbitrary actions of compact groups on finite dimensional C ∗ -algebras are equivariantly semiprojec- tive, that quasifree actions of compact groups on the Cuntz