R ENDICONTI
del
S EMINARIO M ATEMATICO
della
U NIVERSITÀ DI P ADOVA
M. D. P ÉREZ -R AMOS
A p-stable action of the automorphism group of a group
Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, tome 79 (1988), p. 11-14
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=RSMUP_1988__79__11_0>
© Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, 1988, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova » (http://rendiconti.math.unipd.it/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions).
Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
Automorphism Group
of
aGroup.
M. D. PÉREZ-RAMOS
(*)
SUMMARY - The
following
Theorem isproved:
« Let G be a group and Aut(G)
its
automorphism
group. If Aut(G)
is notp-stable
over G, p an oddprime,
then Aut(G}
involvesSL(2, p)
». This Theorem is ageneralization
of a classic result on
stability ([4],
Th.3.8.3).
Introduction. Notation.
In this note all groups will be finite. p will denote a
prime number,
and
0p(G
modN)
the inverseimage
in G of thep-radical
ofG/N.
Ifwe assume that
A
Aut(G)
and H is asubgroup
of G which is fixedby A, then,
whenever a EA.,
we denote[.H’, a]
=[x, a]
= E.H’~, [H, a, a]
=[[H, a], a], [H, A]
=[H, aJI a
EA),
and[H, A, A]
=[[H,
A], A~ .
The remainder of the notation isstandard,
and is takenmainly
from[4].
Inparticular, II(G)
is the set of allprimes
whichdivide the order of the group G.
The first
concept concerning stability
is thefollowing:
DEFINITION A
([4], 3.8).
Let G be a group with no nontrivial normalp-subgroups,
p odd. A faithfulrepresentation
of G on a vectorsp ace V over
GF(pn)
will be calledp-stable provided
nop-element
of has a
quadratic
minimalpolynomial
on V.Moreover,
G issaid to be
p-stable
if all such faithfulrepresentations
of G arep-stable.
(We
will say G isp-stable
linear todistinguish
it from later definitions ofp-stability).
(*) Indirizzo dell’A.:
Dept.
deAlgebra,
Universidad de Valencia, Doctor Moliner 50, 46100Burjassot (Spagna).
12
And the main result on
p-stability
linear:THEOREM A
([4], 3.8.3).
Let G be a group with no nontrivial normalp-subgroups,
p odd. If G is notp-stable linear,
then G involvesSL(2, p).
Later we can find other definitions of
p-stable
groups,([3], [5])
n-stable groups, n a set of
primes, ( [1]),
and ingeneral,
Y-stable groups, where Y is either a saturatedFormation, ( [2] ) ,
or aFitting class, ([8]).
As
well,
we find the closerelationship
between thestability
of a groupG,
and the fact that G does not involve the
special
affin groups~S’A(2, p),
for
adequated primes
p,([3], [5], [2], [7]).
The aim of this paper is to
study
the structure of the automor-phisms
group of a groupby using
these ideas.We
give
thefollowing
Definition:DEFINITION 1. Let G be a group. We say that the
automorphisms
group of
G,
Aut(G),
isp-estable
over Gif,
whenever .A is ap-subgroup
of Aut
(G)
and B is ap-subgroup
ofG,
such that B is fixedby .A, (that
is, A c NAut(G)(B) ),
and[B, A, A] = 1,
thenWe obtain the
following
result:THEOREM 1. Let G be a group. If
Aut (G)
is notp-stable
overG,
p
odd,
thenAut (G)
involves thespecial
linear groupSL(2, p).
First,
wegive
apreliminary
result:LEMMA. For a group
G,
thefollowing
areequivalent:
i)
Aut(G)
isp-stable
over G.ii)
Whenever B is ap-subgroup
ofG,
and x is ap-automorphism
of G which fixes
B,
and such that[B,
x,x]
=1,
theniii)
Whenever B is ap-subgroup
ofG,
and z is anautomorphism
of G which fixes
B,
and such that[B, x, x]
=1,
thenPROOF.
i)
-ii)
Let B and x be as in(ii).
The conclusion followseasily by taking
A =x~,
andusing (i).
where is a pi-group, for each fixes B and satisfies
If
by using (ii). So,
iii)
-*i)
Let A and B be as in Def. 1. For every x EA,
B and xsatisfy
theassumptions
in(iii). Then,
the conclusion is clear.PROOF OF THEOREM 1. Because of the
previous Lemma,
ifAut (G)
is not
p-stable
overG,
there exist ap-subgroup
P ofG,
and ap-element
x in
NAut(G)(P)
such that[P, 0153, 0153]
=1,
andBut,
from([5],
Th.IX.7.8),
this isequivalent
to the existence of anelement g E
NAut(G)(P)
such thatx,
is not ap-group.
Let T =
x,
Let us refine the T-series P > 1 to a T-chief series P =Po > Pl ~ ...
~Pr
=1 (*)
For each, i
= 0,
... , r -1,
9 letPi
=PilPi+,: So,
it is clear that each ==0,
... , r -I,
7 is an abelianp-element
group , thatis, it_is
a vector space over
GF(p),
and each =i = 0, ... , r - 1,
actsfaithfully
andirreducibly
onPi : Therefore,
since([4],
Th.3.1.3),
it follows that 1._
If
Pi
was a p-group forevery i
=0,
... , r -1,
thatis, Ti
==1,
then : Whence T would stabilize the series
(*)
ofP,
and we would
get
a contradiction because isnot a p-group. _
Therefore,
there exists an i E{0,
... , r -1}
such that1, that
is, Ti
is notp-stable linear, (Def. A). Now,
because of Th.A, T,
in-volves and
clearly Aut (G)
involvesSL(2, p).
14
Using
anargument
similar to([4],
Th.3.8.4),
and Th.1,
weget
the
following:
COROLLARY. Let G be a group. If one of the
following
conditionsis verified in
Aut (G) :
i) Aut (G)
is of odd order.ii)
ASylow 2-subgroup
ofAut (G)
is abelian.iii)
ASylow 2-subgroup
ofAut (G)
is dihedral.iv) Aut (G)
isisomorphic
to.L2(q).
v) Aut (G)
is soluble and eitherp > 5
or p = 3 andSL(2, 3)
isnot involved in
Aut (G).
Then, Aut (G)
isp-stable
over G.Acknowledgments.
This note ispart
of the author’s Doctoral Thesis at theUniversity
of Valencia(Spain).
The author wishes to express hergratitude
to hersupervisor
Professor P6rez Monasor and also to Professor Iranzo for their devotedguidance
andencouragement.
The author was
supported by
ascholarship
from the «Ministerio de Educai6n y Ciencia ~ ofSpain.
REFERENCES
[1] Z. ARAD, A characteristic
subgroup of
03C0-stable groups, Canad. J. Math., 26 (1974), pp. 1509-1514.[2] L. M. EZQUERRO,
F-stability of finite
groups, J.Alg., 92,
N. 2 (1985),pp. 395-399.
[3]
G. GLAUBERMAN, A characteristicsubgroup of
ap-stable
group, Canad. J.Math., 20 (1968), pp. 1101-1135.
[4] D. GORENSTEIN, Finite
Groups, Harper
& Row, New York, 1968.[5] B. HUPPERT - N. BLACKBURN, Finite
Groups
II,Springer-Verlag,
Berlin,1982.
[6] M. D. PÉREZ-RAMOS, Estabilidad con
respecto
deNilpotentes,
de Cuasinil- potentes y de clases deFitting
engeneral,
Tesis Doctoral, U. de Valencia,1986.
[7] M. D. PÉREZ-RAMOS,
Stability
withrespect
to aFitting
class,preprint.
[8] M. D. PÉREZ-RAMOS, A characteristic
subgroup of
N-stable groups, Isr. J.Math.,
54,
N. 1 (1986), pp. 51-59.Manoscritto