APPENDIX 4. SEQUENTIAL RANKING COMPARISONS
Figure A4.1. Comparison among (a) baseline boreal-wide, species diversity-focused rankings (scenario 65) and sequential influences of (b) disturbance-discounting, (c) forest species and priority weighting, (d) uncertainty discounting, and (e) mid-century climate change, respectively;
(f) cumulative solution (scenario 110). Highest Zonation ranks are in dark blue; lowest ranks are in yellow. Blue indicates higher rank than comparison scenario; red indicates lower rank.
a b
c d
e f
Figure A4.2. Comparison among (a) baseline BCR subregion-stratified, species diversity-focused rankings (scenario 67) and sequential influences of (b) disturbance-discounting, (c) forest species and priority weighting, (d) uncertainty discounting, and (e) mid-century climate change (scenario 48a), respectively; (f) cumulative solution (scenario 112). Highest Zonation ranks are in dark blue; lowest ranks are in yellow. Blue indicates higher rank than comparison scenario; red indicates lower rank.
a b
c d
e f
Figure A4.3. Comparison among (a) baseline BCR subregion-stratified, species representation- focused rankings (scenario 3) and sequential influences of (b) disturbance-discounting, (c) forest species and priority weighting, (d) uncertainty discounting, and (e) mid-century climate change, respectively; (f) cumulative solution (scenario 48). Highest Zonation ranks are in dark blue;
lowest ranks are in yellow. Blue indicates higher rank than comparison scenario; red indicates lower rank.
f e
c d
b a
