Distr.: LIMITED TRANSCOM/664 June 1993
Original: ENGLISH
ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR AFRICA Launching Seminar on a
Regional Transport Data Base Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
15 - 18 June 1993
INDICATORS FOR THE EVALUATION OF THE SECOND U.N.
TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATIONS DECADE FOR AFRICA
(UNTACDA II)
TRANSCOM/664
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR THE EVALUATION OF UNTACDA II,
I. Background.
1. One of the questions asked towards the end of the UNTACDA I was whether there was any development in transport and communications in Africa since 1978 and whether UNTACDA I contributed to that development in any way. To answer the question, UNTACDA I had to be evaluated within the framework in which it was established. The overall conclusion of the evaluation was that the Decade enabled Africa to equip itself with a global strategy suited to its needs and containing basic elements necessary for establishing and implementing the required policies, plans and programmes at regional and subregional levels.
2. Regarding several inadequacies which reduced the effectiveness of the programme, the evaluators singled out, as one of the obstacles to a detailed evaluation, the inexistence of measurable development indicators for transport which would have made it possible to assess achievements and performances resulting from the pursuit of the Decade objectives. It was also found that evaluation of the progress achieved in the implementation of the Decade was hampered by lack of information, generally because the member states failed to pass on such information regularly and on time to the Decade Secretariat. The evaluators reported also that no verifiers of achievement were defined during the formulation of the programme objectives. They therefore recommended that to avoid a similar situation during evaluations of any future such major regional programmes in the sector, an appropriate identifiers and indicators which would enable an assessment of the achievement of the programme would have to be developed during the formulation of
such a programme.
3. In view of the above recommendations, steps were taken during the preparatory phase of UNTACDA II to define the goals and targets for the programme which would lead to the development of performance indicators for the programme's evaluations.
II. Proposed performance indicators for the evaluation of UNTACDA II
4. The programme of the second Decade will be implemented in
three phases and at the end of each phase there will be an
evaluation. For these evaluations to facilitate measures of the
results obtained and, more especially, to assess the impact of the
progress achieved in the overall development of transport and
communications, basic quantifiable goals and targets are already
TRANSCOM/664 Page 2
defined for each subsector. The goals and targets will still be
««V«SedKby the various subsectoral and subregional working l
as may be necessary in future-
5. Based on the existing goals and targets of the various
s~«nfS?'/8 iS Sp.6lled OUt in chaPter v of the progra^e of SS
second Decade, an attempt has been made as one of the outputs of
«?** Ji? baSe Pro^ect' to define the indicators which correspond
with the agreed subsectoral goals and targets. Some of the indicators are still qualitative in nature and will be gradually improved upon and quantified by the various subsectoral and subregional working groups. However, a sample of indicators as shown for each subsector are given in the attached annexes as
follows:
Annex I. Roads and road transport Annex II. Railways and rail transport Annex III. Maritime transport (shipping)
Annex IV. Ports
Annex V. Multiiaodal transport
Annex VI. Air transport ; Annex VII. Urban transport.
6. Tables on each of the annexes above contain, for each subsector, a set of information covering:
*• Goals and targets as proposed under UNTACDA II.
i-i* Indicators proposed for each goal and target.
iii. Indications whether data are available (A) for the respective indicator or not always available (NAA).
iv. Relevant comments as may be applicable to specific
goals and targets/indicators.
7. It should be noted that finalisation of the indicators by the
various working groups has to be carried out as soon as
practicable, but the availability of the indicators alone will not
complete the requirements of the evaluation exercises unless
Page 3
member states make available the data required for carrying out a data base oriented evaluation using agreed indicators. The few indicators given for each subsector should be considered only as indicative of what the indicators should be. They may be used also in future to guide the various subsectoral anmd subregional working groups in the finalisation of indicators for their subsectors.
8. It should also be noted that the development of indicators for the efficiency/operational performance of the various transport modes at the national level is also an on-going separate exercise
for inclusion in the transport data base.
IV:
ANNEXES
j: ROADS AND ROAD TRANSPORT JX: RAILWAYS AND RAIL TRANSPORT
III: MARITIME TRANSPORT (SHIPPING)
AlfljEXS_V: MULTIMODAL TRANSPORT VI: AIR TRANSPORTS
VII: URBAN TRANSPORT
ANNEXE I
RAOD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY SECTOB PERFMMANCE INDICATJRS FOR UNCTAOA II
SOALS AND TARGETS
1) IMPROVEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL TRAFFIC FACILITATION THROUGH,INTER Kith RATIFICATION AND IMPLENENTATON OF EFFECTIVE INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT SERVICE AGREEMENTS BASED ON COMMERCIAL IKTEKESTB
D DEVELOPMENT IN THE,MAJORITY OF COUNTRIES OF EFFICIENT AXLE-LOAD
WNTROL '.
!> INCREASING TRAFFIC FACILITATION
INDICATORS
- NUMBER OF SUBREGIONS WHICH ESTABLISHED SUBRCGIONAL SERVICE UjREEflEHT-; BASED ON FACILITATION AND COMPETITIVENESS
- NUMBER OF CONTRIE5 IN EACH SUBREGION WHICH RATIFIED AND IMPLEMENT THESE SERVICE AGREEMENTS
• NUMBER OF COUNTRIES WITH EFFICIENT MECHANISM FOR AXLE-LOAD CONTROL
- TRIP TIMES FOR MAIN TRANSIT CORRIDORS
WAI LABt .ITY A
A
A
i.
A
COMMENTS
BUT NEEDS SURVEY
HEEDS SOME SURVEY
- 2 -
MJAL& AND lAKliblS
i) INDICATORS FOB PLANNING AND MACRO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS NOT FORESEEN 3Y PROGRAMME OF UNCTADA 11
■ IMPORTANCE OF ROAO INDUSTRY SECTOR
• GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT ROAD TRANSPORT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT LEVEL AND POLICY
- GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT 1) INDUSTRY OPERATION
INDICATORS
- VEHICLE REGISTRATION IN YEAR
- NUMBER VEHICLES PER 1000 HA
- GROWTH FACTORS - NUMBER VEHICLES PER
ROADS KM - PERCENTAGE OF
INTERCITY PASSENGER (ALL MODES) MOVED BY ROAD
- NUMBER OF VEHICLES PER MILLIONS S GNP
• SHARE OF ROAD INDUSTRY TRANSPORT IH TOTAL BUDGET
NUMBER OF VEHICLES PER 1000 KM PAVED ROADS IMPORT COSTS OF A) VEHICLES B) SPARE PARTS C) FUEL
IMPORT DUTIES FOR A,S,C ABOVE
FUEL TAX PER LITRE FOR GASOLINE AND DIESEL
SECTOR PRICE SYSTEM X VEHICLE FLEET FOR:
A) PUBLIC SERVICE - OWNER OPERATORS
AVAILABILITY
A
A
A A
NAA
A
NAA
A A A
A
A
A NA
COMMENTS
4EEDS GUT SURVEY
EEDS GUT URVEY
- 3 -
2) OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS
3) UTILISATION
4> ffflff T"MSPQgT ^DUSTRY
SAFETY5) °EftMCTI0M OF ROAD TRAMSPORT
SERVICE- FLEET AGE
VEHICLE LOADING CAPACITY
- URBAN TRANSPORT SHARE - LONG DISTANCE
TRANSPORT SHARE - LOAD FACTOR - TRIP LENGTH - DEATHS FROM ROAD
TRANSPORT AS A PERCENTAGE
OF TOTAL DEATH - TYPE OF ACCIDENT - COST OF VEHICLE
OPERATING ;
COSTS
NAA
NAA
NAA NAA
NAA NAA
1UT N6EDS 1ARNON1ZAT1OH HIT NEEOS GOOD SURVEY
(EEDS GUT SURVEY JEEDS
4ARKONAZATION DF DEFINITION 4EEDS EASY SURVEY
- 4 -
RAQD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY SECTOR PERFORHAHCE INDICATORS FOR UNCTADA II
1
2
3
4
5OALS AND TARGETS
CONSTRUCTION OF 15,000 KM CLASSIFIED MAIN ROADS
REHABILITATION OF 200 000 KM OF RURAL ROADS
REHABILITATION OF:
<I> 85 PER CENT OF PAVED ROADS
<II> 40 PER CENT OF UNPAVES ROADS
(111)25 PHR CENT OF RURAL ROADS
IMPLEMENTATION OF EFFICIENT MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS COVERING AT LEAST THE REHABILITATED HETUORK, WITH EMPHASIS ON PROMOTING SMALL AND MEDIUM- SCALE INDIGENOUS ROAD MAINTENANCE ENTREPRISES
length of constructed classified main roads and total length of
classified roads, unit :osts
LENGTH OF REHABILITATED RURAL ROAOS AND TOTAL LENGTH OF RURAL ROADS, JN1T COSTS
LENGTH OF THESE TYPES OF ROADS MAINTAINED AND REHABILITATED AND TOTAL LENGH OF THESE TYPES OF tOADS
X OF GOOD, FAIR, POOR FOR EACH TYPE OF ROADS -RATIO REHABITATIOH AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET/TOTAL ROADS BUDGET
-UNIT COSTS FOR ROUTINE PERIODIC MAINTENANCE -RATIO ADMINISTRATION
EXPENSES/TOTAL EXPENSES -RATIO REHABILITATION AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET/TOTAL F1ANC1KG REQUESTED FOR REHABILITATION AND MAINTENANCE -RATIO ROADS USERS CHARGES.TOTAL REHABILITATION AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET
•X OF ROAD NETWORK REHABILITATED AND MAINTAINED BY PRIVATE ENTREPRISES
-NUMBER OF PRIVATE ENTREPRISES QUALIFIED FOR ROAD REHABILITATION AND MAINTENANCE
A A
NAA A
A A NAA NAA
A
A
A
A
NAA
A
NAA
4EEDS HARMONIZATION
4EEDS HARMONIZATION OF DEFINITION OF RURAL 4OADS AND SOMETIMES INVEfti 3RY
DFTEN EXISTING, NOT ALWAYS RELIABLE. MAY NEED SPECIFIC SURVEYS
MEEDS ANALYSIS
MEEDS SURVEY
50ALS AND TARGETS
REDUCTION OF ROAD ACCIDENTS BY 25 PER CENT
INDICATORS AVAILABILITY
-NUNBER OF ACCIDENT RESULTING IN DEATH OR
INJURY
-NUMBERS OF ACCIDENTS IN URBAN AEREA
-DEATHS AND INJURIES PER 10.000 VEHICLES- INTERURBAN TRAFFIC -DEATHS AND INJURIES PER
10.000 KA (INTERURSAN TRAFFIC);: • -DEATHS FROM INTERURBAN
TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL DEATHS .
NAA
NAA
HAA
NAA
NAA
COMMENTS MEEDS ANALYSIS OF
REPORTS
-JLICE
-INDICATORS FOR MACRO- ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND PLANNING NOT FORESEEN BY PROGRAMME OF UNTCDA II -GENERAL INFORMATION OF
IMPORTANCE OF ROAD NETWORK
-GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT ROAD NETWORK AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT LEVEL AND POLICY
-LENGTH CLASSIFIED ROAD NETWORK PER 100 KM' AREA -LENGTH CLASSIFIED ROAD
NETWORK PER 100O HA LENGHT CLASSIFIED ROAD NETWORK PER MILLION * GNP
X ROADS BUDGET EN TOTAL NATIONAL BUDGET
NUMBER AND FINANCIAL INDICATORS FOR
PARASTATAL ENTREPRISES FOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE
JEEDS ANAYSIS Of FINANCIAL REPORT OF PARASTATAL:
ENTREPRISES NAA
ANNEXE II BAILUAYS TRANSPORT INDICATORS FOB UNTACDA II
1OALS AND TARGETS
A> THROUGH IMPROVEMENT OF RAILWAY SERVICES IT IS EXPECTED THAT RAIL TRAFFIC WILL INCREASE BY 3 PER CENT FOR FREIGTH AMD 2 PER CENT FOR PASSENGERS
B) AVAILABILITY OF LOCOMOTIVES SHOULD BE AT LEAST 70 PERCENT OF THE PROJECTED TOTAL FLEET AT THE
:ND OF THE DECADE THE NUMBERS OF BREAKDOWNS PAR 100,000 KM SHOULD BE REDUCED BY 50 PER CENT AND AVERAGE SUM PER LOCOMOTIVE SHOULD BE INCREASED BY 30 PERCENT.
C) WAGON AND PASSENGER CAR PRODUCTIVITY SHOULD BE INCREASED BY 30 PER CENT
D) AVERAGE COST PER UNIT/KM SHOULD BE REDUCED BY 30%
INDICATORS
-FREIGHT TRAFFIC tTON X KM, ANDIN TON]
-PASSENGER TRAFFIC {PASSENGER X KM, AND IN PASSENGER]
- LOCOMOTIVE AVAILABILITY - NUMBERS OF BREAKDOWNS PER
100,000 KM
- LOCOMOTIVE PRODUCTIVITY (TRAFFIC UNITS PER LOCO X
HOUR) OR
- LOCOMOTIVE TOTAL OUPUT URILIZATION FACTOR (GROSS TON X KM PER LOCO X HOUR) - WAGON PRODUCTIVITY INDICATOR
(RATIO TK/TOTAL CAPACITY OF THE FLED) OR
- UAGON CAPACITY UTILIZATION RATIO
- NET CAOCH PRODUCTIVITY (RATIO: PASSENGER X KM/TOTAL CAPACITY Of THE FLEET IN SEATS
COST PER UNIT KM
avaiubilitT™
T ~
A
"a
NAA A A
An
A
COMMENTS
BUT NEEDS MRMONIZATION OF
DEFINITIONS
COACH AVAILABILITY
NEEDS HARMONIZATION OF DEFINITIONS
- 2 -
XMLS AND TARGETS E) HUMAN RESOURCES PRODUCTIVITY EXPRESSED IN UNIT/KM PER STAFF SHOULD BE RAISED BY AT LEAST 40
>ER CENT
F) DURING THE DECADE, AT LEAST 25 PERCENT OF THE EXISTING TRACK SHOULD BE EITHER PARTIALLY OR TOTALY RENOVATED (ABOUR 8,000 KM)
G) BY THE END OF DECADE, EVERY RAILWAY CORPORATION SHOULD SEEK TO ESTABLISH FORMAL RELATIONSHIPS WITH GOVERNMENTS THROUGH CONTRACT PLAN OR MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING CLEARLY SPELLING OUT THE ROLE OF THE RAILWAY ANO THE STATE. EACH RAILWAY PLAN OF ACTION SHOULD BE SPELT OUT IN THE CORPORATE PLAN.
INDICATORS
NUMBER OF TRAFFIC UNITS PER PERMANENT STAFF
RATIO: LENGTH OF RENOVATED TRACK/TOTAL LENGTH OF TRACK - TOTAL LENGTH COMPLETELY
RENOVATED
AT EACH PHASE OF DECADE:
NUMBER OF RAILWAY WITH CONTRACT PLAN OF MEMORANDUM
A
NA
NA
NEEDS GOOD DEFINITION OF RENOVATED TRACK
A3ADHS 0003 SQ33N
3NIJ3CI 3801 11I1S
1KWSNVM1 SAVnilVK
IVlOi -
(11VM AB Q3A0H
S300H 11V>
DIJVMi
lHDI3Ud JOaOViN33S3d A1I3V31N1
S3AU0H03O1
saivnrHi qnvshivso
MOHi¥30 N1
0NUinS3d jo
iVOdSNVl
Q31WI3133aV 38
niwdw
DHuni JOlMaHdO13A3fl NV31«"*
1N33
H3d 01 1SV31 onnoHS awiivm
(T
SAVmiVU JO
13VdM N3AI9 1N3M3NOHIAN3OX
3 U M31V3113 flifPHSNOIIWHV
NV31WV anoj
m SM39VNVNAWI1IV) sasimm .in 38mnOHS
gmwivax ^"•l
ONVS1VC
}OALS AND TARGETS
- GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT RAILWAY TRANSPORT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT LEVEL AND POLICY
- REVENUE AND FINANCIAL INDICATORS
INDICATORS
- PERCENTAGE OF INTERCITY PASSENGER (ALL MODES) MOVED BY RAIL
- LENGTH RAILWAY PER MILLION * GNP
- RATIO RAILUAY BUDGET/TOTAL TRANSPORT SECTOR BUDGET - X PASSENGER REVENUE AS TOTAL
REVENUE
• PASSENGER PER T X KM (FRAIGHT)
- REVENUE PER PASSENGER X KM - WORKING RATIO
• OPERATING RATIO
AVAILABILITY NAA
A A
A
A A A A
?
COMMENTS
NEEOS GOOD SURVEY ~~~
AMNEXE til MARITIME TRANSPORT (SHIPPING)
INDICATORS FORUWTACPA H
O TO ACHIEVE EQUITABLE PARTICIPATION in SEA-BORNE INER TRADE UNOER CONDITIONS OF UNITED NATIONAS CODE
DF CONDUCT FOR LINER CONFERENCES8) TO INCREASE SIGNIFICANTLY THE PARTICIPATION OF IATONAL FLEETS IN NON LINER TRADE UNDER CONDITIONS OF MTACDA RESOLUTION 120 (V)
C) TO INCREASE THE COMPETITIVENESS OF NATIONAL FLEETS
THROUGH MODERNISATION AND ADAPTATION OF TONNAGE TO TRADING REQUIREMENTS AND THROUGH ADAPTATION OF MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES LEADING TO REDUCED UNITS COSTS)F TRANSPORT
D)TO INCREASE SIGNIFICANTLY THE LEVEL OF OWNERSHIP UO CONTROL BY AFRICAN COUNTRIES OF COMPETITIVE TONNAGE ADAPTED TO THE EQUIPEMENTS OF AFRICAN TRADE
X LINER MARITIME TRAFFIC 8Y CONFERENCE NATIONAL FLEETS IN TOTAL HATIONAL LINER MARITIME TRAFFIC OF CONFERENCES (IN TONS AND VALUE) - X NON LINER TRAFFIC BY NATIONAL FLEETS IN TOTAL NON LINER NATIONAL 4ARITIME TRAFFIC
- NUMBER, TYPE AND AGE OF EACH SHIP OF THE FLEETS
- VESSELS PRODUCTIVITY: TONNAGE TRANSPORTED BY VESELS IN
YEAR/COMMERCIAL CAPACITY OF VESSELS IK rEAR
• AVERAGE TURN-ROUND TIME OF THE SHIP/AVERAGE TURN-ROUND OF THE TYPE OF THESE SHIPS ON THE SAME RANG
SPECIFIC SHIP TURN-ROUND IN DAY/SHIP (TOTAL YEARLY OPERATING TIME SPENT BY THE FLEET OPERATED/NUMBER OF SHIP OPERATED)
- TOTAL SHIP ROUND IN DAY/SHIP = TOTAL rEARLY OPERATING TIME SPENT BY THE FLEET OPERATED/NUMBER OF THE SHIPS OPERATED
- FINANCIAL INDICATORS (CASH FLOW, MR< RATIO, OPERATING RATIO)
TONNAGE OF COMPETITIVE VESSELS OF AFRICAN OWNER/TOTAL TONNAGE OF COMPETITIVE VESSELS (CONTAINERS SHIP (O-RO) IN MARITIME TRANSPORT OF EACH COUNTRY
NAA/A
A/NAA
A/NAA
A/NAA
NAA/A
A/NAA
A/NAA
A/NAA
4EEDS ANALYSIS
4EEDS SURVEY
JEEDS SURVEY
HEEDS SURVEY
JUT NEEDS SURVEY
4EDS SURVEY
JEEDS ANALYSIS DF FINANCIAL RESULTS OF MARITIME ENTERPRISE
ANNEXE IV
PORTS INDICATORS FOR UHTACDA II
5OALS AND TARGETS INDICATORS WA1LABILIT1 C0HMEN1
III
PORTS
, TO INCREASE THE PRODUCTIVITY OF AFRICAN SEAPORTS
TO REDUCE THE TIME BOTH CARGO AND SHIPS SPEND IN PORTS
TO REDUCE CARGO LOSSES DUE TO 3AMAGE AND PILFERAGE:
TO REDUCE PORT COSTS PER TON OF CARGO HANDLING (FOR SHIP)
TO IMPROVE THE MAINTENANCE OF TORT EQUIPMENT SO THAT THE
>OWN TIME OF EQUIPEMENT IS REDUCED:
A) PORT PERFORMANCE INDEX: TOTAL TONNAGE LOADED AND UNLOADED BY THE PORT IN ONE YEAR/TOTAL TIME OF ALL CARGO-SHIPS IN PORT DURING THE YEAR
!> LABOUR PRODUCTIVITY:
- TONS/GANG/HOUR FOR GENERAL CARGO TEU (TUENTY FEET EQUIVALENT
JNITS);GANG:HOUR FOR CONTAINERIZED CARGO A) SHIP'S TIME IN PORT:
TOTAL TIME OF ALL SHIPS VISITING THE PORT FOR COMMERCIAL OPERATION DURING A
YEAR/TOTAL NUMBER OF THE SHIPS IN THE PORT DURING A YEAR
9> CARGO'S TIME IN PORT:
TOTAL TIME THE CARGO SPENDS IN THE PORT FROM THE MOMENT IT ENTERS TO THE MOMENT IT LEAVES THE PORT/TOTAL VOLUME OF CARGO HANDLED BY THE PORT.
ft) INFORMATION ON FINANCIAL LOSSES DUE TO 3AMAGE AND PILFERAGE
A) TOTAL COST (PORT CHARGES+SHIP'S TIME+STEVEDORING+TALLYING+SHOREHANDLING )/
TOTAL TONNAGE HANOELED
A) UTILIZATION OF CARGO HANDLING EQUIPEMENT: DE FACTO AVAILABILITY OF MAJOR TYPES OF EQUIPMENT/PLANNED AVAILABILITY OF THIS EQUIPMENT
NAA
NAA
NAA
NAA
NAA NAA
NAA
NEEDS
HARMONIZATION
NEEDS SURVEY
NEEDS SURVEY
NEEDS SURVEY
IV INDICATORS FOR PLANNING AND MACRO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS NOT FORESEEN BY PROGRAMME OF JNTACDA II
- NUMBER AND CAPACITY OF SEAPORTS - TOTAL TONS LOADED IN AFRICAN PORTS
• TOTAL TONS UNLOADED IN AFRICAN PORTS - TOTAL CONTAINERS HANDLED BY AFRICAN
PORTS
A A A NAA
port statistics
in order to evaluate the progress of African ports within the
context of the objectives of the UNTACDA--II and <>«^*f»*• £ £
African and international community, the indicators which shouldJje applied, are to be clearly read even by those who are not experts and to provide information on the two aspects: Physical volume of the work done by the ports and Efficiency of the port in producing
that volume of work.
A. r^neral Statistics
General Statistics are applied to evaluate the aizs of the traffic through ports. In the range of several years it could show the trends of t!ie traffic.
In our cas« the appropriate General Statistics indicator will
be:
a) Total Tonnage Loaded in African ports.
b) Total Tonnage Unloaded in African ports.
c) Total containers handled by African ports.
a) Total volume of cargo handled by African ports at the beginning and at the end of the UNTACDA-II (i.e. TOEND in the
international trade of African which is over 90% sea borne).
b) Camparison of the volume of containers handled by African . ports will show introduction of modern technologies in African
ports.
These indicators should be included into the section IV. The/
are available in the UNCTAD annual reviews of maritime transport (with regard to containers-for selected countries only).
B. operational statistics.
Port operational statistics show efficiency of African ports and will help to compare it with that of the other ports of the
world.
These indicators are different from port to port and from year to year and are not readily available but are normally included in every port statistics and could be obtained on request. For the purpose of the Second Decade evaluation an average figure for African ports should NOT be calculated. Rather highest and lowest figures should be taken for different years and then compared with each other and with the relevant statistics of non-African ports.
These indicators should be included in the section III.
a) Labour productivity.
Tons/ Gang/Hour on general cargo and TEU/Gang/Hour on
containers (TEU - Twenty feet Equivalent Unit).
- 2 -
It will show how the efficiency of port labour changes.
b) Port performance index.
Tons of cargo handled per hour of ship's total stay in port:
Total tonnage of cargo loaded and unloaded by the port in one year Total time of all cargo-ships in port during a year.
This indicator will show how the port's efficiency in handling ships changes.
c) Ship's time in port.
Total port time of all ships, visiting the port for commercial operations/number of ships in the port within one year.
d) Utilization of cargo handling equipment:
Availability of each type of cargo handling equipment de facto/Planned availability of this equipment (in hours).
C. Additional indicators
These not readily available indictors and this statistics hardly exists if it is necessary.
a) Cargo productivity in port.
Total volume of cargo handled by the port divided by the total time the cargo spends from the moment it enters the port to the moment it leaves the port (in either direction).
b). Tonnage handled per linear meter of quays.
Total tonnage handled at the berths within one year/total linear inetrea of the port quays.
c) Financial indicators.
They will include losses because of damage and pilferage,
revenues, etc.
It is stated once again that if we want to evaluate the
progressive role of the Second Decade with regard to ports, we
should use the indicators proposed on the parts A. and B. only,
without going into details.
ANNEXE V MUTIHODAL TRANSPORT INDICATORS FOR UNTACDA II
OALS AND TARGETS INDICATORS WAI LABILITY COMMENTS
INCREASING THE NUMBER OF AFRICAN COUNTRIES WHICH ARE
XNTRACTING PARTIES TO THE UN MLTIMOOAL TRANSPORT
INVENTION FROM THE PRESENT 3 TO 25
NUMBER OF COUNTRIES WHICH HAVE RATIFIED THE CONVENTION
INCREASING THE NUM3ER OF AFRICAN COUNTRIES WHICH ARE
MNTRACTING PARTIES TO THE HAMBURG RULES FROM THE PRESENT 13 TO 45
NUMBER OF COUNTRIES WHICH ARE CONTRACTING PARTIES TO THE HAMBURG RULES
ESTABLISHMENT BY AT LEAST 25 COUNTRIES OF NATIONAL TRADE AND TRANSPORT FACILITATION
;OHMITTEES
NUMBER OF COUNTRIES WHICH HAVE ESTABLISHED NATIONAL TRADE FACILITIES COMMITTEES
NA
ESTABLISHMENT BY AT LEAST 25 COUNTRIES OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONS OF FRE1GTH FORWARDERS AND MTOS
NUMBER OF COUNTRIES WHICH ESTABLISHED NATIONAL FREIGHT FORWARDERS
ASSOCIATION
HA
- 2 -
MULTIMODAL TRANSPORT INDICATORS FOR UNTACDA 11
5
6
7
T"
9
SOALS AND TARGETS
INTRODUCTION BY AT LEAST 25 COUNTRIES OF SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURES FOR CUSTOMS CLEARANCE OF CONTAINERS AND 3OOOS
INTRODUCTION OF AT LEAST 25 COUNTRIES OF ADMINISTRATIVE U(D COMMERCIAL PROCEDURES ALLOWING EDI TO BECOME WAILABLE TO THE TRADE MfD TRANSPORT INDUSTRIES
INTRODUCTION BY AT LEAST 25 COUNTRIES OF PROCEDURES FACILITATING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF JOINT VENTURES IN THE FIELD OF SHIPPING AND MULTIMODAL TRANSPORT
IARRYING OUT BY AT LEAST 25 COUNTRIES OF FA1SIBILITY STUDIES IN THE ESTABLISHMENT 3F INLAND CLEARANCE DEPOTS C1CDS) AND THE IMPLEMENTATION 3F THE FINDINGS OF THE STUDIES IY THE COUNTRIES
TAKING MEASURES BY AT LEAST 25 COUNTRIES TO INCREASE
CONTAINERIZATION OF THEIR IATIONAL TRADE BY 5% ANNUALLY
INDICATORS
NUMBER OF CONVENTIONS WHICH HAVE INTRODUCED SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURES FOR CUSTOMS CLEARANCE PROCEDURES OF CONTAINERS AND GOOD
NUMBER OF COUNTRIES WHICH ARE
INTRODUCING EDI IN THEIR TRADE SYSTEMS
NUMBER OF COUNTRIES INTRODUCING JOINT VENTURES IN SHIPPING AND HULTIMODAL TRANSPORT
NUMBER OF COUNTRIES IMPLEMENTING STUDIES IN THE ESTABLISHMENT OF KDS
NUMBER OF COUNTRIES INCREASING THE CONTAINERIZATION OF THEIR NATIONAL TRADE BY 5% ANNUALLY
AVAILABILITY N.A
N.A
N.A
N.A
N.A
COMMENTS SURVEY REQUIRED
SURVEY 1EQU1RED
SURVEY tEQUlRED
SURVEY REQUIRED
SURVEY SQUIRED
HUTIMODAL TRANSPORT INDICATORS FOR UNTACDA II
10
11
SOALS AND TARGETS
WENOMENT BY ALL CONTRACTING 'ARTIES TO THE MT CONVENTION AND THE HAMBURG RULES OF THEIR
MT1ONAL LEGISLATION WCORDINGLY
JSE BY ALL NATIONAL MTDS OF INTERNATIONALLY RECOGNISED
RJLTIHODAL TRANSPORT DOCUMENTS SUCH AS THOSE BASED IN THE
IN-CTAD/ICE RULES IN
WLTIMOOAL TRANSPORT DOCUMENTS
INDICATORS
NUMBER OF COUNTRIES AMENDING THEIR MATIONAL LEGISLATION TO SUIT THE REQUIREMENT OF HT CONVENTION AMD HAMBURG RULES
NUMBER OF ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL '.
NTS USING THE UN-CTAD/ICE RULES IN MULTIMODAL TRANSPORT DOCUMENTS
AVAILABILIT N.A
N.A
COMMENTS REQUIRE SURVEY
REQUIRE SURVEY
ANNEXE VI TRANSPORT AERIEN
OBJECTIFS CIBLES INOICATEURS DISPONIBILITE NTAIRES
A) D'ICl LA FIN OE LA PHASE II: TROIS MS, PHASE III: TROIS ANS, ETANT ENTENOU OUE DANS CERTAINS CAS, LE
>ASSAGE PAR TOUTES LES PHASES POURRAIT HE PAS ETRE NECESSAIRE;
4OMBRE DE COOPERATIONS WNUELLES ET DE TYPES DE COOPERATIONS, ENftEGISTES EMTRE LES CONPAGN1ES 4ERIENNES
A COLLECTER
B) COOTS D'EXPLOITATION: LE N1VEAU DES COOTS D'EXPLOITATION DES COMPAGNIES ItERIENNES AFRICAINES DEVRA1T, AUTANT WE POSSIBLE AVOIS1NER LA MOTENNES WHOIALE ET NE PAS OEPASSER 10% DE CETTE MOYENNE;
POURCENTAGE DU COOT EXPLOITATION DES COMPAGNIES AERIENNES KFRICAINES PAR RAPPORT AU KVENUE D'EXPLOITATIOH.
- COOT D'EXPLOITATION PAR LOGHES OES C0NPAGN1ES HERIENNES AFRICAtNE EX:
.AFRIQU£/EUROPE .INTERAFRICAIN (SUR
OUELQUES PRINCIPALES LIGNE5.
A CALCULER
A COLLECTER
C) GEST1ON OES COMPAGNIES AERIENNES:
WGNENTER LE NOMBRE DE COMPAGNIES AERIENNES AFRICAINES APRES LES REGROUPENENTS ET L'APPLICATION OES WESURES RECOHMANDEES DANS LA JECLARATION OE YAMOUSSOUCROj
UGHBRE DE COMPAGNIES tERIENNES BENEFICIAIRSE
AR AN.
A COLLECTER
3) GESTION DES AEROPORTS ET DES ESPACES AERIENS: AUGMENTER LE NOMBRE )'AUTORIT£S AEROPORTUA1RES AUTONOMES AINSI OUE CELUt DES AUTORITES DE GESTION COMMUNE D'ESPACE AERIENS;
4omsre d'autorites eroportuaires autonomes :ree par an (ngm des
AYS).
k COLLECTER
E) LE RESEAU AFRICAIN; AMELIORATION )ES RESEAUX GRACE A L'AUGMENTATION DES
REQUENCES ENTRE PA[RES DE VILLES, LA EDUCTION OU TEMPS DE VOYAGE, LA COORDINATION ET LA RATIONALISATION DES
ORAIRES,
NOMBRE DES NOUVELLES IGNES INTRODUCES PAR AN . LMNTERIEUR DES SOUS- REGIONS <OUEST, CENTRE, WORD, AUSTRALE,
ORIENTALE).
DETERMINER
- 2 -
TRANSPORTAiRlEM
NOMBRE DE NOUVELLES L1GNES EXPLOlTttS PAR AN ENTRE LES HFFfiRENTES SOUS-REGIONS
FRICAINES
NCMBRE D£ FREQUENCES ANNUELLES ENTRE LES PRINC1PALES PAAAAIRES DE VILLES SUIVANTES:
DAKAR/ABIDJAN, DAKAR/LAGOS, JAKAR/ BAMAKO, DAKAR/ACCRA, DAKAR/HIAMEY, DAKAR.LOME.
- ABIDJAN/LAGOS, ABIDJAN/ACCRA, ABIDJAN/CONAKRY, ABIDJAN/BANJUL, AB1DJAN/OUAGA.
- ACCRA/BANJUL, ACCRA/COTOHOU, ACCRA/BAMAKO.
LAGOS/BMAKO, LAGOS/OUAGA, LAGOS/NIAMEY, BAMAKO/COTONOU.
DOUALA/lUANOA.
- NAIROBI/HARERE,
NAIROBI/MAPUTO, NAIROBI/LUSAKA.
- ADDIS/LUSAKA, ADDIS/
- ALGER/CA1RE, ALGER/KHARTOUM.
TUNIS/KHARTOUM, TUNIS/CAIRE - CASA/KHARTOUM, CASA/ALGER,
CASA/CA1 RE ^^_^____
4ECESSITE DES IECHERCHES
F) FLOTTES: RENOUVELER LES FLOTTES 3'AERONEFS GRACE A DES MECANISHES DE FINAHCEMEHT EXISTANTS OU A CREER;
CREATION DE LA SOCIETE DE LEASING.
G) CIRCULATION AfiRIENNE: AMELIORATION 3ES SERVICES DE TRAFIC AERIEH POUR ACCROlTRE L'EFFICACIT6 DES EQUIPAGES
=T LA SECURITE DES PASSAGERS;
MOMSRE D'AIRHISS, D'ACCIDENT ET D'INCIDENT SUfl LES RINCIPAUK AEROPORTS DES DIFFfeRENTES SOUS- REGIONS.
4ECESSITE UNE COLLECTION
- 3 -
TRANSPORT AERIEH
OBJECT IFS CI8LES INOICATEURS OISPONIBILITE COMMENTAIRES
O PLAN OE NAVIGATION AERIENNE OE L'OACI POUR L'AFRIOUE ET L'OCCAN INOIEN (AFI): ASSURER UNE NEILLEURE APPLICATION DU PLAN AFI OE NAVIGATION URIENNE DE L'OACI;
LES REALISATIONS PAR PAYS EFFECTIVES CONFORMEMENT AU PLAN 3E NAVIGATION AFI OE L'OACI.
) AEROPORTS: AMELIORATION OES
NFRASTRUCTURES AEROEPORTUAIRES PAR LA EDUCTION DU NOMBRE
'ACCIDENTS/INCIDENTS LIES AUX NSUFFISANCES DES INFRASTRUCTURES iEROPORTUAIRES, DES INSTALLATIONS ET ERVICES.
.ES COOTS O'INVESTISSEENT (PAR
•AYS) EN INFRASTRUCTURE ET LES YPES.
COLLECTER
ANNEX VII
UBBMi TRANSPORT IHDICATP* FOB UHTACDA II
GENERAL INFORMATIONS ABOUT
IfCnKl^^b •■■■ **■»•--" - --_
URBANIZATION OF EACH COUNTRY: RATIO: URBAN POPULATION/TOTAL POPULATION (PERCENTAGE) :■ . RATIO: CAPITAL CITY/URBAN POPULATION (PERCENTAGE) .:
NUMBER OF CITIES WITH A POPULATION EXCEEDING (QUANTITY)
A) 500,000 HA B) 1 000.000 HA
RATIO: CITY POPULATION/URBAN AREA (POP: SOW)
PERCENTAGE INCREASE IN URBAN POPULATION PER ANNUM (PERCENTAGE)
A N.A H.A
NEEDS GOOD CENSUS DATA ; NEEDS GOOS CENSUS DATA,
- 2 -
URBAN TRANSPUT INDICATOR fO» UHTACDA II
SUPPLY OF UB8*U PUBLIC TRANSPORT SERVICES
SUPPLY FOR URBAN PUBLIC TRANSPORT SERVICES
B> PRODUCTIVITY AND EFFICIENCY OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT SERVICES
2) TO FACILITATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF CHEAPER AND MORE APPROPRIATE MODES OF TRANSPORT
PUBLIC PASSENGER TRANSPORT UCEC QUANTITY PER 1 000 POPULATION FOR
- BUS (OVER 60) ""
- MINIBUS
■- SHARED TAXI - HETERED TAXI - TWO-UHELLED TAXI
1) NUMBER OF BUS COMPANIES IN EACH CITY WITH1 A POPULATION EXCEEDING 500.000 HA <QUANTITY>
2) FOR EACH BUS COMPANY:
- PEAK-HOUR TURNOUT AS PROPORTION OF OPERATIONAL FLEET
• RATIO: NUMBER OF DAILY BREAKDOWNS TO BUSES IN OPERATION (PERCENTAGE)
• EMPLOYEES PER OPERATIONAL BUS
(QUANTITY) '.
- BUS KILOMETERS PER DAY (KM) - COST PER PASSENGER KILOMETER
(OPERATION COST, DEPRECIATION NpJ.HTEREST)
Q) AVERAGE PEAK HOUR AND OFF PEAK JAIT1NG TIMES (WNUITES)
t) WALKING DISTANCE TO BUS STOPS (KM OR MINUTES)
- PROPORTION OF TRIPS BY MODE - KILOMETERS OF TWO-WHEELED
TRACKS PER 100,000, POPULATION - KILOMETERS OF BUS LANES/OR
PUBLIC TRANSPORT SEGREGATED RIGHT OF WAY PER 100,000 HA - MUH8ER OF COUNTRIES WHICH
HAVE:
A) PROGRAMME OF MANUFACTURING OF TWO-WHEELED? (YES OR NOT)B) CREDIT PROGRAMME FOR TWO-
UHEELED (YES OR NOT)
H.A.A
N.A.A
N.A.A
N.A.A
A N.A.A
N.A.A
N.A.A
EEOS GOOD CENSUS
iUT NEEDS SURV2Y
4EEDS SOMETIMES SURVEY
*EEDS SOMETIMES OIRVEY
4IGK COST HOUSEHOLD SURVEY
NEEDS CITY ROAD INVENTORY
- 3 -
MflAAU TBAMSPCffiT FOR UMTACPA II
II
0 IMPROVE THE EFFICIENCY OF 10AD NETWORKS THROUGH ROAD IEHABIUTAT10N, MAINTENANCE AND COMPREHENSIVE TRAFFIC
IANAGEMENT MEASURES
III
3ALS AND TARGETS
f»QADS AMD TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT
ROADS TBAfFIC SAFETY
PAVED ROAD KILOMETERS PER 1 000
IRBAH POPULATION (KM/POP)PAVED ROAD KILOMETERS PER URBAN AREA KM/SO.KM)
PROPORTION OF URBAN PAVED ROAD IN SOOD AVERAGE AND POOR CONDITION (PERCENTAGE)
RATIO URBAN MAINTENANCE BUDGET/TOTAL RANSPORT SECTOR BUDGET 5%)
NUMBER OF SIGNALIZED INTERESECTIONS
•ER TRAFFIC DENSITY
- PROPORTION OF SIGNALS THAT ARE .INKED
- PROPORTION OF SIGNALS THAT ARE IN JORKING ORDER
- EXISTENCE OF MECHANISM FOR COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF ROAD ACCIDENT DATA <YES OR NO)
- OEATH PER ROAD ACCIDENTS IN URBAN AREA PER 10.000 URBAN VEHICLES
• DEATHS AND INJURIES (URBAN
TRANSPORT) PER 10.000 URBAN POPULATION (100.000)
- DEATHS FROM URBAN TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL DEATHS.
NUMBER OF COUNTRIES WHICH HAVE:
A) VEHICLE INSPECTION CENTRES B) NATIONAL ROAD SAFETY COORDINATION
COMMITTEE
C) EFFECTIVE COMPUTERIZED NATURAL ACCIDENT
COLLECTION SYSTEM OPERATING D) EFFECTIVE ACCIDENT
SEDUCTION.PREVENTION
PROGRAMMES BIEMG IMPLEMENTED
N.A.A
N.A.A N.A.A
A
N.A.A
A N.A.A
N.A.A N.A.A
IEEDS GOOD CENSUS ATA
EEDS ROAD NVENTORY
HEEDS ROAD NVENTORY
BUT NEDS GOOD CENSUS DATA NEEDS GOODS CENSUS 3ATA
MEEDS SURVEY
MEEDS ANALYSIS
NEEDS ANALYSIS
URBAN TRANSPORT 1HDICAT0R FOR UWTACOA II
IV
3OALS AKB TASGSTS FINANCING
TO ESTABLISH A NEW FINANCING POLICIES
1) LOCAL AUTHORITY INCOME THROUGH JRBAN TRANSPORT SECTOR
2) EXPENDITURES LINKED TO URBAN RANSPORTAT1ON (STATE AND LOCAL) <US$>
- INffiASTURCURE
• MATERIALS
- SUBSIDY OR OPERATING TRADE-OrF 5j REVENUS A80 EXPENDITURES AS
■■Hi.-#-;JR-;::.■:* OF THE OVERALL BUDGET
TO ESTABLISH NEM PRICE POLICES
INDICATORS WA1LAI1LIT'
- STATE
- LOCAL AUTHORITY
) EXISTENCE OF NEW FINANCING POLICIES
(YES OR «OT) _
THE PRICES FIXED BY STATE? (YES OR NO)
EXISTENCE OF SUBSIDY FOR PRICE GAPS (YES OR W»
N.A.A
N.A.A
N.A.A
COMMENTS
NEEDS GOOD CENSUS DATA
NEEDS GOOD CENSUS DATA
VI INSTITUT1OMAL AMD POLICY FRAMEWORK
TO CREATE NATIONAL AGENCIES IH ORDER TO COORDINATE AND IMPLEMENT COMPREHENSIVE URBAN TRANSPORT POLiCY MEASURES
- TO CREATE PROFESSIONAL ORGANSZATIONS Of URBAH TRANSPORT SECTOR
1) EXISTENCE OF THESE AGENCIES (YES OR MO) AT:
- NATIONAL LEVEL - CITY LEVEL
2) THESE AGENCIES 00 OR DO NOT INCLUDE PRIVATE SECTOR
3) EXISTENCE AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SEGLEMENTATION TO ACCESS THE SU8S6CTOR REGULATIONS
- EXISTENCE OF THESE ORGANIZATIONS (YES OR NO)
