• Aucun résultat trouvé

Preface of SQM 2011

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Preface of SQM 2011"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Fifth International Workshop on Software Quality and Maintainability

Bridging the gap between end-user expectations, vendors’ business prospects, and software engineers’ requirements on the ground.

Magiel Bruntink Software Improvement Group

The Netherlands [email protected]

Kostas Kontogiannis

School of Electrical and Computer Engineering National Technical University of Athens

Greece

[email protected]

Preface

The fifth international workshop on Software Quality and Maintainability (SQM 2011) offered a forum to re- searchers to present their original work and to practitioners to relate their experiences on issues pertaining to software quality and maintainability. Moreover, the theme of the workshop invited discussion on how to bridge the gap be- tween end user expectations, business requirements, vendor performance, and engineering constraints regarding soft- ware quality.

SQM 2011 was held as a satellite event of the 15th Eu- ropean Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengi- neering (CSMR 2011). In 2010, the fourth SQM workshop was held as a satellite event of CSMR 2010.

Carl Worms of Credit Suisse kicked-off the workshop with an invited talk titled ”Software Quality Management - Quo Vadis?” A short paper describing his current work is included in these proceedings.

In this volume, you will further find the papers accepted for presentation at the workshop. Out of 8 full-paper sub- missions, 6 papers were selected. The accepted papers were published at CEUR-WS1.

Theme & Goals

Software is playing a crucial role in modern societies.

Not only do people rely on it for their daily operations or business, but for their lives as well. For this reason, cor- rect and consistent behaviour of software systems is a fun- damental part of end user expectations. Additionally, busi- nesses require cost-effective production, maintenance, and operation of their systems. Thus, the demand for good qual- ity software is increasing and is setting it as a differentiator for the success or failure of a software product. In fact, high

1http://ceur-ws.org

quality software is becoming not just a competitive advan- tage but a necessary factor for companies to be successful.

The main question that arises now is how quality is mea- sured. What, where and when we assess and assure quality, are still open issues. Many views have been expressed about software quality attributes, including maintainability, evolv- ability, portability, robustness, reliability, usability, and ef- ficiency. These have been formulated in standards such as ISO/IEC-9126 and CMMI. However, the debate about qual- ity and maintainability between software producers, ven- dors and users is ongoing, while organizations need the abil- ity to evaluate the software systems that they use or develop from multiple angles.

So, is ”Software quality in the eye of the beholder”? This workshop session aims at feeding into this debate by estab- lishing what the state of the practice and the way forward is.

Accepted papers

• Automated Quality Defect Detection in Software De- velopment Documents, Andreas Dautovic, Reinhold Ploesch and Matthias Saft.

• Design Pattern Detection using Software Metrics and Machine Learning, Satoru Uchiyama, Atsuto Kubo, Hironori Washizaki and Yoshiaki Fukazawa.

• Using the Tropos Methodology to Increase the Qual- ity of Software Design, Andrea Capiluppi and Cornelia Boldyreff.

• Tool-Supported Estimation of Software Evolution Ef- fort in Service-Oriented Systems, Johannes Stammel and Mircea Trifu.

• Preparing for a Literature Survey of Software Archi- tecture using Formal Concept Analysis, Lu´ıs Couto,

(2)

Miguel Alexandre Ferreira, Eric Bouwers and Jos´e Nuno Oliveira.

• Evidence for the Pareto principle in Open Source Soft- ware Activity, Mathieu Goeminne and Tom Mens.

Organization

Chairs

• Magiel Bruntink, Software Improvement Group, The Netherlands

• Kostas Kontogiannis, National Technical University of Athens, Greece

• Miguel Alexandre Ferreira (publicity chair), Software Improvement Group, The Netherlands

Program Committee

• Arp´ad Besz´edes, University of Szeged, Hungary´

• Andrea De Lucia, University of Salerno, Italy

• Florian Deissenboeck, Technische Universit¨at M¨unchen, Germany

• Massimiliano Di Penta, University of Sannio, Italy

• Juergen Ebert, University of Koblenz-Landau, Ger- many

• Slinger Jansen, Utrecht University, the Netherlands

• Rainer Koschke, University of Bremen, Germany

• Robert Lagerstr¨om, the Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden

• Radu Marinescu, Politehnica University of Timisoara, Romania

• Liam O’Brien, National ICT Australia Limited, Aus- tralia

• Ladan Tahvildari, University of Waterloo, Canada

• Arie van Deursen, Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands

• Jurgen Vinju, Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica, the Netherlands

• Joost Visser, Software Improvement Group, the Netherlands

• Carl Worms, Credit Suisse, Switzerland

• Hongyu Zhang, Tsinghua University, China

• Christos Tjortjis, University of Ioannina & University of Western Macedonia, Greece

• Alexander Chatzigeorgiou, University of Macedonia, Greece

• Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Spain

• Rudolf Ferenc, University of Szeged, Hungary Sub-reviewers

• Markus Buschle

• P´eter Heged¨us

• Giuseppe Scanniello

• Gabriella T´oth Sponsors

Software Improvement Group Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all members of the Program Committee and to their sub-reviewers for helping to make SQM 2011 a success. Many thanks to Carl Worms for his keynote talk.

Also we would like to thank the Software Improvement Group for sponsoring and hosting our website, and Easy- Chair.org for their invaluable conference organization tool.

February 2011,

Magiel Bruntink and Kostas Kontogiannis Chairs SQM 2011

Références

Documents relatifs

Therefore, i f the infant can discriminate the chromatic patch from the background for i l l combinations, including at least one in which the patch and background match in

Issues we had to address were a very wide range of user abilities, complex system governance, a hostile user base, heterogeneous hardware and a desire to avoid political risk

We have already seen major changes away from monolithic, custom-built systems to much more highly componentised distributed systems incorporating software packages,

The term software evolution has emerged in many research papers with roots both in computer science and software engineering disciplines [16].. Nowadays, it has become an

Put in other words, we reformulate the anonymization problem — in the case of sequential data — as the problem of hiding k-infrequent sequences, i.e., transforming the original

Overall, the workshop aimed at gathering together research- ers and practitioners to discuss experiences in the application of state of the art approaches to measure, assess

The overall maintainability correla- tion with defect resolution time decreased sig- nificantly while the original system properties correlate similar with defect resolution

Christian Schlegel University of Applied Sciences (Germany) Lionel Seinturier University of Lille/INRIA (France) Severine Sentilles M¨ alardalen University (Sweden) Massimo