• Aucun résultat trouvé

Preface of the the 7th International Workshop on Quantitative Approaches to Software Quality

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Preface of the the 7th International Workshop on Quantitative Approaches to Software Quality"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Preface of the

7 th International Workshop on

Quantitative Approaches to Software Quality (QuASoQ 2019)

Horst Lichter RWTH Aachen University

Germany lichter@swc.rwth-aachen.de

Thanwadee Sunetnanta Mahidol University

Thailand

thanwadee.sun@mahidol.ac.th

Toni Anwar

Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS Malaysia

toni.anwar@utp.edu.my

I. INTRODUCTION

After a successful 6th QuASoQ workshop we slightly adjusted the list of topics for the workshop. The topics of interest included

• New approaches to measurement, evaluation, compari- son and improvement of software quality

• Metrics and quantitative approaches in agile projects

• Case studies and industrial experience reports on suc- cessful or failed application of quantitative approaches to software quality

• Tools, infrastructure and environments supporting quan- titative approaches

• Empirical studies, evaluation and comparison of meas- urement techniques and models

• Quantitative approaches to test process improvement, test strategies or testability

• Empirical evaluations or comparisons of testing tech- niques in industrial settings

Overall, the workshop aimed at gathering together research- ers and practitioners to discuss experiences in the application of state of the art approaches to measure, assess and evaluate the quality of both software systems as well as software develop- ment processes in general and software test processes in partic- ular.

As software development organizations are always forced to develop software in the "right" quality, the quality specification and quality assurance are crucial. Although there are lots of ap- proaches to deal with quantitative quality aspects, it is still chal- lenging to choose a suitable set of techniques that best fit to the specific project and organizational constraints.

Even though approaches, methods, and techniques are known for quite some time now, little effort has been spent on the exchange on the real-world problems with quantitative ap- proaches. For example, only limited research has been devoted

to empirically evaluate risks, efficiency or limitations of differ- ent testing techniques in industrial settings.

Hence, one main goal of the workshop was to exchange ex- perience, present new promising approaches and to discuss how to set up, organize, and maintain quantitative approaches to soft- ware quality.

II. WORKSHOP HISTORY

The QuASoQ workshop series has been started in 2013. Since then, it is always organized as a collocated event of the Asia- Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC).

These are the past workshop editions:

6th QuASoQ 2018

Nara, Japan | CEUR Vol-2273

5th QuASoQ 2017

Nanjing, China | CEUR Vol-2017

4th QuASoQ 2016

Hamilton, New Zealand | CEUR Vol-1771

3rd QuASoQ 2015

New Delhi, India | CEUR Vol-1519

2nd QuASoQ 2014 Jeju, Korea | IEEE Xplore

1st QuASoQ 2013

Bangkok, Thailand | IEEE Xplore

Since the first edition 48 papers have been presented; the aver- age acceptance rate it ~ 75 %.

The following chart depicts where the authors of accepted pa- pers come from.

7th International Workshop on Quantitative Approaches to Software Quality (QuASoQ 2019)

Copyright © 2019 for this paper by its authors.

Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). 1

(2)

III. WORKSHOP FORMAT

Based on our former experience we wanted the workshop to be highly interactive. In order to have an interesting and interactive event sharing lots of experience, we organized the workshop presentations applying the author-discussant model.

Based on this workshop model, papers are presented by one of the authors. After the presentation, a discussant starts the dis- cussion based on his or her pre-formulated questions. Therefore, the discussant had to prepare a set of questions and had to know the details of the presented paper. The general structure of each talk was as follows:

• The author of a paper presented the paper (20 minutes).

• After that, the discussant of the paper opened the discus- sion using his or her questions (5 minutes).

• Finally, we moderated the discussion among the whole audience (5 minutes).

IV. WORKSHOP CONTRIBUTIONS

Altogether 9 papers were submitted. Finally, these 6 papers were accepted by the program committee for presentation and publi- cation covering very different topics.

• Hirohisa Aman, Sousuke Amasaki, Tomoyuki Yokogawa, Minoru Kawahara: Empirical Study of Fault Introduction Focusing on the Similarity among Local Variable Names

• Xingguang Yang, Huiqun Yu, Guisheng Fan, Kang Yang, Kai Shi: An Empirical Study on Progressive Sampling for Just-in-Time Software Defect Prediction

• Masayuki Doi, Yoshiki Higo, Shinji Kusumoto: A Code Clone Curation - Towards Scalable and Incremental Clone Detection -

• Konrad Fögen and Horst Lichter: An Experiment to Compare Combinatorial Testing in the Presence of Invalid Values

• Mahen Gandhi, Amit Kumar, Yugandhar Desai, Sonali Agarwal: Studying Multifaceted Collaboration of OSS Developers and its impact on Bug Fixing Performance

• Yoon Chow Yeong, Simon Hacks, Horst Lichter:

Prioritization of EA Debts Facilitating Portfolio Theory We grouped the papers into three sessions and added a final round-up slot to present and discuss the major findings of our workshop. The following, we introduce the accepted papers.

V. SUMMARY OF THE DISCUSSIONS

About 15 researchers attended the workshop and participated in the discussions. The author-discussant model was well received by the participants and led to intensive discussions among them.

The discussions show, that empirical studies and the results of experiments are of high value and lead to a deeper understanding of the subject that has been investigated.

To conclude, in the course of this workshop the participants pro- posed and discussed different approaches to quantify relevant aspects of software development. Especially the discussions led to new ideas, insights, and take-aways for all participants.

VI. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Many people contributed to the success of this workshop. First, we want to give thanks to the authors and presenters of the ac- cepted papers. Furthermore, we want to express our gratitude to the APSEC 2019 organizers; they did a perfect job.

Finally, we are glad that these people served on the program committee (some of them for many years) and supported the workshop by soliciting papers and by writing peer reviews:

• Ana Nicolaescu, Daimler AG, Germany

• Wan M.N. Wan Kadir, UTM Johor Bahru, Malaysia

• Maria Spichkova, RMIT University, Melbourne, Aus- tralia

• Tachanun Kangwantrakool, ISEM, Thailand

• Jinhua Li, Qingdao University, China

• Apinporn Methawachananont, NECTEC, Thailand

• Nasir Mehmood Minhas, BTH Karlskrona, Sweden

• Chayakorn Piyabunditkul, NSTDA, Thailand

• Sansiri Tanachutiwat, Thai German Graduate School of Engineering, TGGS, Thailand

• Hironori Washizaki, Waseda University, Japan

• Hongyu Zhang, University of Newcastle, Australia

• Minxue Pan, Nanjing University, China

Workshop chairs, Horst Lichter

Thanwadee Sunetnanta Toni Anwar

7th International Workshop on Quantitative Approaches to Software Quality (QuASoQ 2019)

Copyright © 2019 for this paper by its authors.

Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). 2

Références

Documents relatifs

Knowledge Extraction from Games (KEG) is a workshop exploring questions of and ap- proaches to the automated extraction of knowledge from games. We use “knowledge” in the

Just-in-time (JIT) defect prediction, which predicts defect- inducing code changes, can provide faster and more precise feedback to developers than traditional module-level defect

Christian Schlegel University of Applied Sciences (Germany) Lionel Seinturier University of Lille/INRIA (France) Severine Sentilles M¨ alardalen University (Sweden) Massimo

We would like to thank the MODELS 2018 organization for giving us the opportunity to organize this workshop, especially to the general chair of MODELS 2018 Andrzej Wsowski

Federico Ciccozzi M¨ alardalen University, Sweden Benoit Combemale IRIT, University of Toulouse, France Jonathan Corley University of West Georgia, USA Andrea D’Ambrogio University

It tries to cover all aspects of modeling, yet analytics and mining of model repositories (and other large collections of models) has not been a prime focus or the topic of a

Dijkstra and Kooy, [6] in their paper “The Learning model of Smartphone Feedback Applications in the field of e-health applied to the Step Counter The Learning model of Smartphone

Overall, the workshop aimed at gathering together researchers and practitioners to discuss experiences in the application of state of the art approaches to measure, assess and