• Aucun résultat trouvé

Stress distribution inside a powder bed: does Janssen’s model applicable locally in a granular medium

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Stress distribution inside a powder bed: does Janssen’s model applicable locally in a granular medium"

Copied!
28
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01606814

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01606814

Submitted on 3 Jun 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Stress distribution inside a powder bed: does Janssen’s model applicable locally in a granular medium

Agnès Duri-Bechemilh, Sandra Mandato, Bernard Cuq, Thierry Ruiz

To cite this version:

Agnès Duri-Bechemilh, Sandra Mandato, Bernard Cuq, Thierry Ruiz. Stress distribution inside a powder bed: does Janssen’s model applicable locally in a granular medium. 7. World Congress on Particle Technology (WCPT7), May 2014, Pekin, China. �hal-01606814�

(2)

Stress distribution inside a powder bed:

does Janssen’s model applicable locally

in a granular medium?

Sandra Mandato, Agnès Duri*, Bernard Cuq and Thierry Ruiz

2 Place Pierre Viala - 34000 Montpellier – FRANCE

UMR IATE

http://umr-iate.cirad.fr/

WCPT 7

(3)

Motivation

What is the local stress distribution

in an ensiled granular media ?

(4)

Applications:

• Stability of silos

• Initial state before powder flowing

(mixing processing…)

Motivation

What is the local stress distribution

in an ensiled granular media ?

(5)

Weight measurement at the bottom of a cylindrical grain column

(6)

Weight measurement at the bottom of a cylindrical grain column

The well-known Janssen’s experiment (1895)

From a certain height of bed, any powder addition does not make

any variation of mass weighed at the bottom

Hydrostatic pressure rgh

Weight measured

at the bottom of the column

Weight

poured

in the

(7)

Janssen’s model

Pressure at the bottom of a cylindrical grain column

3 hypotheses: • Lateral uniformity of the vertical stress (layer model)

• The horizontal stress is proportional to the vertical stress • Slipping at the wall (Coulomb criterion)

(8)

l

= D/4µK

Janssen’s model

Weight deflection into lateral sides of the column

Pressure at the bottom of a cylindrical grain column

3 hypotheses: • Lateral uniformity of the vertical stress (layer model)

• The horizontal stress is proportional to the vertical stress • Slipping at the wall (Coulomb criterion)

Hydrostatic pressure rgh

P =

r

g

l

(1-e

-h/l

)

Pressure: P Height of grain in the colum : h

(9)

BOTTOM

Stakes Janssen’s model? z Height of grain in the colum : h Vertical stress: szz ( z) at the bottom

(10)

BULK

BOTTOM

Stakes Janssen’s model?

Profile of the local vertical stress in an ensiled granular media?

Effect of the particle size?

?

z z

?

r Vertical stress: szz (r, z) in the bed Height of grain in the colum : h Depth in the bed of grains : z Vertical stress: szz ( z) at the bottom

(11)

Method ETUDE STATIQUEStakes

Janssen’s model?

Side view

of the texture analyser

Probe Force sensor Front view Large probe Rheological device Rheological device

Janssen’s experiment: large probe

Measurement of the vertical stress

at the bottom of the cell

0 < z ≤ 14 cm (height of the bed)

z

(12)

Side view

of the texture analyser

Method ETUDE STATIQUEStakes

Janssen’s model?

2D rheological device 2D rheological device

Measurement of the vertical stress

in the granular bed

0 < x ≤ 4 cm & 0 < z ≤ 14 cm (position in the bed)

2D-cartography of the local vertical stress

Local experiment: small probe

0

14 cm

x

Front view

(13)

• A range of 5 wheat-based powders : native and agglomerated particles

Material ETUDE STATIQUEStakes

Janssen’s model? Sample Name d50 (µm) dsp Fine semolina 210 1.53 Medium semolina 300 1.46 Fine couscous 680 0.95 Medium couscous 950 0.54 Wheat-based powders Wheat-based powders

• Native powder : durum wheat semolina (pasta, noodle, couscous…) Characterisation of the local vertical stress profiles

Effect of the size and the structure on the local vertical stress profiles

(14)

Janssen’s profile:

• Deviation from the hydrostatic profile •

l

= 23 cm 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 00.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2

Vertical stress (kPa)

Janssen's model Hydrostatic profile

Semolina height (cm)

Results

Janssen’s approach

Screening of the weight

by the lateral sides of the cell

d

Material and method Stakes

Janssen’s model?

Janssen’s profile Janssen’s profile

(15)

Local profile ¹ Janssen’s profile

Results Material and method

Stakes Janssen’s model?

Janssen & local vertical stress profiles in the center of the cell Janssen & local vertical stress profiles in the center of the cell

12 10 8 6 4 2 00.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2

Vertical stress (kPa)

Semolina height/Depth of the probe (cm)

Local approach - x=0

(16)

14 12 10 8 6 4 2 00.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2

Vertical stress (kPa)

Semolina height/Depth of the probe (cm)

l

b » 2 cm

l

h» 4 cm

II

• 3 zones

• 2 characteristic lengths:

l

h » 4 cm and

l

b » 2 cm

• Jannsen value at the bottom of the cell !

Results Material and method

Stakes Janssen’s model?

I

III

Janssen & local vertical stress profiles in the center of the cell Janssen & local vertical stress profiles in the center of the cell

Local approach - x=0

(17)

12 10 8 6 4 2 00.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2

Vertical stress (kPa)

Semolina height/Depth of the probe (cm)

l

» 2 cm

l

h» 4 cm

II

• 3 zones

• 2 characteristic lengths:

l

h » 4 cm and

l

b » 2 cm

• Jannsen value at the bottom of the cell !

Results Material and method

Stakes Janssen’s model?

I

III

Janssen & local vertical stress profiles in the center of the cell Janssen & local vertical stress profiles in the center of the cell

Local approach - x=0

(18)

14 12 10 8 6 4 2 00.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2

Vertical stress (kPa)

Semolina height/Depth of the probe (cm)

l

b » 2 cm

l

h» 4 cm

II

• 3 zones

• 2 characteristic lengths:

l

h » 4 cm and

l

b » 2 cm

• Jannsen value at the bottom of the cell !

Results Material and method

Stakes Janssen’s model?

I

III

Janssen & local vertical stress profiles in the center of the cell Janssen & local vertical stress profiles in the center of the cell

Janssen !

Local approach - x=0

(19)

14 cm de profondeur 11 cm de profondeur

l s

3 cm de profondeur

ls

Lateral side effect over ls» 2 cm Constant vertical stress

Results Material and method

Stakes Janssen’s model?

Local vertical stress profiles in horizontal planes Local vertical stress profiles in horizontal planes

x (cm)

x (cm)

Vertical Stress (kPa

)

Vertical Stress (kPa

)

x (cm)

Vertical Stress (kPa

)

"Camel’s hump" shape Local vertical stress profiles in horizontal plane Local vertical stress profiles in horizontal plane

4 cm 14 cm z 0 cm 3 cm 0 cm x

• Zone I: Lateral uniformity of the vertical stress

• Zone II & III: Lateral inohomogeneity of the vertical stress

12 cm I I II II III III

(20)

Vertical Stress (kPa)

x

Results Material and method

Stakes Janssen’s model? 2D iso-stress cartography 2D iso-stress cartography Surface Bottom z

(21)

Vertical Stress (kPa)

lh

Results Material and method

Stakes Janssen’s model? 2D iso-stress cartography 2D iso-stress cartography Surface Hydrostatic II I III lb Network percolation Stress screening x z Surface Janssen - Bottom

(22)

Vertical Stress (kPa)

Results Material and method

Stakes Janssen’s model? III II I 2D iso-stress cartography 2D iso-stress cartography lh Hydrostatic lb Network percolation Stress screening Janssen -ls ls Stress screening x z Surface Janssen - Bottom

(23)

Vertical Stress (kPa)

Results Material and method

Stakes Janssen’s model? III II I 2D iso-stress cartography 2D iso-stress cartography lh Hydrostatic lb Network percolation Stress screening ls ls Stress screening x z Surface Janssen - Bottom

(24)

Vertical Stress (kPa)

Results Material and method

Stakes Janssen’s model? II I 2D iso-stress cartography 2D iso-stress cartography lh Hydrostatic lb Network percolation Stress screening ls ls Stress screening III

effect

effect

The bottom is a side as an other…

x

z

Surface

(25)

Particle size effect ? Particle size effect ?

Results Material and method

Stakes Janssen’s model?

Particle size

does not affect:

• Shape of the profile • Characteristic lengths 0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 16 12 8 4 0 d50=210 µm

Depth of the probe (cm)

0.0 0.4 0.8 1.216 12 8 4 0 d50=680 µm 0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 16 12 8 4 0 d50=950 µm 0.0 0.4 0.8 1.216 12 8 4 0 Vertical Stress (kPa)

d50=1100 µm

l

b » 2 cm

l

h» 4 cm

l

b » 2 cm

l

h» 4 cm II I III II I III

(26)

14 12 10 8 6 4 2 00.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2

Vertical stress (kPa)

d50=210 µm

d50=300 µm

d50=680 µm

d50=950 µm

d50=1110 µm

Depth of the probe (cm)

Particle size effect ? Particle size effect ?

II I

III

Results Material and method

Stakes Janssen’s model?

Particle size affects :

Intensity of the local vertical stress

l

b » 2 cm

(27)

Conclusions

• Generic device

implementation for

measuring

2D-cartography

of the

vertical stress

in

ensiled granular powders.

• Non-equivalence

between

global

and

local

vertical stress

measurements

except

at the

bottom

of the cell (

semolina

).

• Particle size affects

the

intensity

of the

local vertical stress

but

not

the

shape

of the vertical stress profile and the

(28)

Stress distribution inside powder bed: does Janssen’s model applicable locally

in a granular medium?

Sandra Mandato, Agnès Duri*, Bernard Cuq and Thierry Ruiz

2 Place Pierre Viala - 34000 Montpellier – FRANCE

UMR IATE

http://umr-iate.cirad.fr/

WCPT 7

T1.2 Particle property and inter-particle force characterization

Références

Documents relatifs

always an effect of cohesion on the maximum angle of stability. This regime has been called the “gran- ular regime” according to Tegzes experiments in which a cohesion effect on

(see also the numencal work in reference [12]), which shows that the vertical component of trie force beneath a sand heap bas a double-belled shape, with a local minimum at trie

This- siniilarity between the structure and velocity distribution of the granular fluid and the usual hard disk fluid suggests that the kinetic theory of Jenkins [9] is applicable.

In any computable probability space, a point is Schnorr random if and only if it is typical for every mixing computable dynamical system.. The paper is organized as follows: Section

The limit of the initial energy for the solution Ψ ε of the wave equation (38) is given by Lemma 6.3 and it coincides with the sum of the initial energies of the homogenized

In this system the light field that probe the atoms deep inside the porous medium is strongly scattered by the medium and have a propagation direction, amplitude and phase

For comparison, we have measured fluorescence decay-times in a Rb vapor cell with no porous medium where no bound of τ ′ was reached (Fig. Color online a) Photon count rate versus

However, even for 2D patterns, the spatial variability of ripples formed by a monochromatic gravity wave of high quality in a flume suggests that statistics on distributions of