HAL Id: jpa-00247322
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00247322
Submitted on 1 Jan 1997
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.
Quantitative Study of
aFreely Cooling Granular Medium
Pierre Deltour
(*)
and Jean-Louis BarratD6partement
dePhysique
des Mat4riaux(**),
Universit4 Claude BernardLyon
1,69622 Villeurbanne
Cedex,
France(Receiied
9April
1996,accepted
17September 1996)
PACS.47.50.+d Non-Newtonian fluid flows PACS.05.20.Dd Kinetic
theory
PACS.47.55.Kf Multiphase and
particle-laden
flowsAbstract. We present a numerical
study
of a two-dimensionalgranular
mediumconsisting
of hard inelastic disks. The evolution of the medium
throughout
acooling
process is monitored.Two different types of instabilities
(shearing
andclustering instability)
are found todevelop
in the system. Thedevelopment
of these instabilities is shown to be inqualitative
and quantitativeagreement with the
predictions
of linearizedhydrodynamic theory.
R4sum4. Nous
prdsentons
une 4tude d'un fluidegranulaire
modAle h deux dimensionscompos4 de disques durs
in61astiques.
On s'int6resse h l'Avolution du milieu pendant le processus de refroidissement. Dansun tel
systAme,
deux types d'instabilit6 peuvent apparaitre spontan4-ment. La caract6risation de leur croissance est quantitativement en accord
avec la prddiction de
l'hydrodynamique
lin6aris6e.1. Introduction
Granular fluids are dense niedia
coniposed
ofelenientary
elenients ofniacroscopic size, undergo- ing
collisions in which theirmacroscopic
energy is not conserved. In the lastdecade,
the flow ofthese
granular
fluids has received agreat
attention front thephysics coniniunity,
both because these media offer a"siniple" exaniple
ofdissipative systenis
and because of their nunierousindustrial
applications.
Two factors niake the behaviour ofgranular
fluids very different front that of niolecular fluids.Firstly,
theniacroscopic
size of theparticles iniplies
that external fields(boundaries
orgravity)
have a niuchstronger
effect ongranular
fluids.Secondly,
theenergy of the
granular
fluid is not a conserved variable, since the heatdissipated
in collisionscan be considered as lost as far as the flow is concerned. These two effects are often difficult to
disentangle
inexperinients,
and also in the nunierical siniulations that aini at a realisticniodelling
of theseexperinients ill.
A differenttype
of nunierical siniulations was initiatedby
several groups
[2-6].
In thisapproach
external fields areignored,
andonly
thedissipation
is taken into account. Thisdissipation
is nioreover niodelled in a verysiniplistic
way,by
de-scribing
theparticles
asnionodisperse rigid
hardspheres undergoing
inelastic collisions. The(*)
Author forcorrespondence (e-mail: [email protected]) (**)
UMR CNRS 5586©
Les#ditions
dePhysique
1997"cooling
these authors start front an
equilibriuni configuration
of an elasticjr
=
I)
hard disc fluid.The behaviour of this fluid after
introducing
a nonzero restitution coefficient is followedusing
the standard niolecular
dynaniics
niethod for hard bodies[10],
with a collision rule that takes thedissipation
into account. The kineticteniperature (average
kinetic energy perparticle)
decreases due to the
inelasticity
of thecollisions,
so that the fluid cools down as tinie increases.It was shown in
[2,5] that, depending
on thesysteni size,
on the restitution coefficient anddensity,
thiscooling
follows different routes. In thesiniplest
case,(sniall systenis
or snialldissipation)
the fluid reniainshoniogeneous
at all teniperatures. Inlarger systenis
or forlarger dissipations,
either thevelocity
field or thedensity
field in the fluiddevelop
instabilities and beconieinhoniogeneous.
It was also foundby
the saute authors that the occurrence of such instabilities is inqualitative agreenient
with thepredictions
of a linearstability analysis
of thehydrodynaniic equations
forgranular
fluidsiii. Finally,
it was discovered in[3,
5] that in sortie cases, thecooling
ends at a finite tinie due to asingularity
in the systenidynaniics,
which was shown tocorrespond
to an infinite nuniber of collisions within a finite tinie. Thissingularity,
observed both in I and 2
diniensions,
was described as an "inelasticcollapse"
of thesysteni.
In this paper, a detailed and
quantitative analysis
of theinstability
ofhoniogeneous cooling
ofgranular
fluids isattenipted.
Our alai is to coniparequantitatively
thepredictions
ofgranular
kinetic
theory
andgranular hydrodynamics
to the results of moleculardynaniics
simulations of thecooling
of an inelastic hard disk fluid. The paper isorganized
as follows. The niainpredictions
ofgranular hydrodynaniics concerning
thecooling probleni
arebriefly
recalled.Coniputational
detailsconcerning
the siniulation aregiven
in Section 3. The differentreginies occurring during
thecooling
areanalyzed
in Section4,
andconipared
with the theoreticalpredictions.
Our niain focus will be on thegrowth
rate of thedensity instability,
that can beconiputed by nionitoring
the structure factor of the systeni as a function of tinie.Finally,
the
probleni
of the "inelasticcollapse"
is addressed in Section 5, where apossible
niethod foravoiding
thissingularity
in thesysteni dynaniics
isproposed.
2.
Hydrodynamic Analysis
of theCooling
ProblemThe
hydrodynaniic equations
that have beenproposed
to describegranular
flow [7] are based onniass and nionientuni
conservation,
and are very siniilar to the usual Navier-Stokesequations.
The
only
modification is the appearance of a new term in the energy(or teniperature) equation, accounting
for the loss of energy in the collisions. Theseequations
can beconipactly
written in the fornij)
=
-PV.v, (1)
Dv
Pm
" -VP,
=(2)
p~~
= -V
Q
tr(fib) ~fT~/~, (3)
where
D/Dt
is thehydrodynaniic
derivative, p is thedensity, b
thesymnietrized velocity gradient
tensor, P the stress tensor,Q
the heat flux and~f represents the rate of energy lost due to inelastic collisions. For a hard disk
fluid,
theequation
of state and theexpression
of the varioustransport
coefficients can be obtained from Jenkins and Richnian kinetictheory
[9].These
expressions
are recalled inAppendix
A. The energy sink term,~fT~/~,
has also been written in the forniappropriate
for hard disks. ~f in that case is a function of thedensity
and the restitutioncoefficient,
which at least in the lowdensity
liniit niust beproportional
to p and(I r).
This can be understood front thefollowing reasoning:
the kinetic energy loss perparticle
per unit tinie isproportional
to the collisionfrequency (i.e.
topT~/~)
and to theenergy loss per collision
(I r)T.
A trivial solution of the
cooling probleni
forniulated abovecorresponds
to anhoniogeneously cooling fluid,
with a unifornidensity,
avanishing velocity field,
and a uniforniteniperature
with an
algebraic
tiniedecay
T(tl
= To
1
+
)) (41
Here to "
2po/l'foTo~/~)
sets the tinie scale forteniperature decay
in the fluid. The linearstability
of thishoniogeneous
solution has beeninvestigated
in references[2,11].
For coni-pleteness,
the niain steps of thisanalysis
will berepeated
here. The linearizedequations
that describe the evolution of a sinusoidalperturbation
6p
=6p~
exp(ik r), (5)
bv =
bvk
exp(ik r) (6)
bT
=
bTk
exp(ik r)
,
(7)
around the
honiogeneous
solution are~~Pk
-i
(k
. vk) > ~~~
ok .
~°
at (9)
~~k(10) -
bki ' jk~ (k fi
Po ~~ ~°
~
~~ '
T~
b6Tkj
_ 2~~~
~
(ik
~~~~ °~ ~
~°
°~ ~°j~oToi/2[T)-
3/2u Ill~
l~~~ ~~
As for
usualfluids,
the transverse partof
theelocityfield
conipletely
decouples front
thelongitudinal
part,
and decays with tinieas
ii+
t/to ~~°~~~~°~~° The part of theA B C
',',,
~~'~0.0
O-1 0.2ko
Fig.
I. Thedecay
rate of thevelocity
field disturbancescomputed by solving equation (4)
for p = 0.2, r = 0.9 is shown in thisfigure
asa function of wavevector. The dashed line indicates the
decay
rate of the transverse modes. The black linescorrespond
to the real part of thedecay
rate of the threelongitudinal
modes.have an
algebraic
tiniedependence:
6p~
=b)~[l+t/to)~, (12)
6vk
"6Pk
(1 + t/to)~~~, (13)
bTk
#bTk (I
+ t/to)~~~ (14)
The
exponents ((k)
for the three triodes are the three roots of the deterniinant of thefollowing
set of
equations
b>k ~~~ti
~~+
k~To P'(Uo)
+ Uo
Ill
l~l
+ill]11
+6fk ik~PoP'(Uo)1
- °6p~ (~
to(-2
+T)/~u ~~
au ~°'(uo)()
+6Tk ((
+1)
~° +ok~j
= 0.opo to
A
typical plot
of the wavevectordependence
of these three roots,together
with thegrowth
rate of thevelocity perturbations,
is shown inFigure
I. It niust beeniphasized
that thestability
ofvelocity
disturbances is determinedby
thecomparison
between thegrowth
exponent of the disturbance with the value -I that characterizes thedecay
of the thermalvelocity.
Hence agrowth exponent larger
than -I for the transverse orlongitudinal velocity
fields is indicative of aninstability
of themacroscopic velocity.
If thegrowth exponent
of thelongitudinal
ve-locity
field islarger
than-I,
acorresponding instability
in thedensity
field will follow frontequation (12).
This
analysis yields
to theprediction
of three differentpossible
behaviours of thesysteni, depending
on the value of theparanieters
and on thesysteni size,
that introduces a lower wavevector cutoff. If this lower cutoff is in theregion
C ofFigure I,
thehomogeneous
solution will belinearly
stable. Thisreginie
will be described as thehoniogeneous
kineticregime.
If the lower cutoff moves to theregion
B inFigure I,
the transversevelocity
field will beconieunstable while the
systeni
reniainshoniogeneous.
In this"shearing" reginie.
first observed in reference[2],
ashearing
flow willdevelop
in thesystem. Finally,
for a lower cutoffcorresponding
to the
region A,
aninstability
of thelongitudinal velocity
field and thecorresponding instability
in the
density
field will takeplace together
with theshearing instability.
In this"clustering"
regime,
thegrowth
ofdensity
disturbances willyield
to the formation of dense clusters ofparticles,
as first observed in reference[12].
All three situations have
already
been observed in numerical siniulations of thecooling
in two-diniensionalgranular
fluids. The aini of the next sections will be to attenipt aquantita-
tiveanalysis
of the behaviour of acooling granular fluid,
and to conipare the results to thepredictions
suniniarized above.3.
Computational
DetailsThe niodel siniulated in this work is in all
respects
siniilar to that studied in[2, 5].
The systeni is niade up of N hard inelastic disks of dianieter a, in a square cell of size L withperiodic
boundary
conditions. The cell size L sets the lower cutoff in wavevector space,kmin
= 27r
IL.
A standard cell-linked Molecular
Dynaniics algorithni
for hard bodies[10]
is used. In a first step, thesysteni
isequilibrated
with a coefficient requal
tounity.
At tinie t =0, inelasticity
is switched on and
cooling
starts, with an initialteniperature To-
The restitution coefficiententers
through
asimple
niodification of the standard collision rule between harddisks,
thevelocities of the two disks after a collision
being given by
u(
= ui(l
+r)[fi (ui u2))fi, (15)
2
~~
~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~'
~~~~where the
prinies
denote thequantities
after collision and fi is a unit vectoralong
the centers line fromparticle
1 towardsparticle
2. The natural units in thisprobleni
are theparticle
mass m and dianieter, and the thernial energy at t = 0, I.e.To-
Thecorresponding
tinie unit isT =
(m/T)I/~a.
The state of thesysteni
is definedby
three diniensionlessnunibers,
which are the reduced size Lla (or equivalently
the reduced cutoffk[~~
=kmina),
the reduceddensity p*
=a~N/L~,
and the restitution coefficient r.The state of the fluid
during
thecooling
was nionitoredby
asysteniatic coniputation
ofcoarse-grained (hydrodynaniic) density
andvelocity
fields. The coarsegraining
isobtaining
here front a division of the
systeni
into 100 square subcells.Besides,
statisticalquantities characterizing
the state of thesysteni
have also beensysteniatically coniputed.
Thesequantities
are the nionienta of the
velocity
distribution of individualparticles,
thepair
correlation functiong(r)
forinterpartide distance,
and the structure factorS(k)
=6p~6p_~. (17)
This structure factor can be
coniputed
for all wavevectorsconipatible
with theperiodic
bound- ary condition. of the forni(n~, ny)kmjn.
As thesysteni
is not in astationary state,
thesequanti-
ties are tinie
dependant.
Alarge enough systeni
is thus necessary to obtain reasonable statisticsi-o
O-O
O-O 1.0 2.0 3.O 4.O
r/ a
Fig.
2. Pair correlation functionsgirl
computed for the initial(in
black shifted upby 0.5)
and final(in grey) configurations
in anhomogeneously cooling
system(N
= 1600. p*
= 0.5. r =
0.99).
The temperaturedrops by
a factor of170000 withoutsignificant change~
in the pair correlation function.without tinie
averaging.
The values of Ninvestigated
in this work vary front N= 1600 to
,l/ =10000.
4. Results
4.I. KINETIC REGIME.
According
to theanalysis
of SectionI,
the kineticregime
corre-sponding
to a stablehoniogeneous cooling
will be observed(at
agiven density
and restitutioncoefficient)
for sniallenough systenis.
Such a situation allows a cleartesting
of sortie of thehypothesis
of the kinetictheory description
of thegranular
fluid. Inparticular,
thepair
corre~lation function and
velocity
distribution can beconipared
to that of an elastic hard disk fluidthroughout
thecooling
process. Theteniperature decay
can be nionitored andcompared
to the theoreticalprediction (Eq. (4)),
and thedecay
tinie to(or equivalently
the coefficient ~(pi conipared
to theprediction
of kinetictheory.
The
pair
correlation of anhoniogeneously cooling granular
fluid after theteniperature
hasdropped by
a factor of170000 is shown inFigure
2. Thisconiparison
shows that the local structure of thecooling granular
niediuni(which
deterniines itsgquation
ofstate)
reniainsessentially
identical to that of anequilibriuni
fluid. Thestudy
of thevelocity
distribution function shows that this distribution reniains Maxwellianthroughout
thecooling.
This-
siniilarity
between the structure andvelocity
distribution of thegranular
fluid and the usual hard disk fluidsuggests
that the kinetictheory
of Jenkins [9] isapplicable.
Thisexpectation
is borne outby
thestudy
of the tiniedependence
of the fluidtemperature.
Asshown in
Figure
3, the temperaturedecay
isperfectly
describedby equation (4).
Thedensity
600.0
soo.o
400.0
~
~~
300.0~
200.0
ioo.o
~~0.0
100000.0 200000.0 300000.0t/1
Fig.
3. Evolution of the square root of the inverse temperature versus t in anhomogeneously cooling
systemjr
= 0.99, p* = 0.1, N=
1600).
The solid linecorresponds
to thehydrodynamic prediction
in the kineticregime.
dependence
of thedecay
tinie to isconipared
inFigure
4 to theprediction
of kinetictheory (see appendix B).
Theagreenient
isextreniely good,
andsuggests
that all thetransport
coefficientsappearing
in thehydrodynaniic equations
can be estiniatedusing
this kinetictheory.
4.2. SHEARING REGIME. if the restitution coefficient r decreases or if the size of the
systeni increases,
thehydrodynamic theory predicts
areginie
in which transverse fluctuations of thevelocity
field are unstable. Thisreginie
is indeed observed in thesiniulations,
as shown inFigure
5. A shear flow thatcorresponds
to the sniallest wavevectorconipatible
with theperiodic boundary
conditionsdevelops
in thesysteni.
In thisreginie,
the total kinetic energy of thesysteni (which
in that case is not theteniperature,
since thesysteni
hasdeveloped
anordered flow
pattern) appreciably
deviates frontequation (4),
as shown inFigure
6.4.3. CLUSTERED REGIME. For even
larger
systems or smaller restitutioncoefficients,
thecooling granular
fluid beconiesinhoniogeneous,
as shown inFigure
7. Thisspontaneous
fornia- tion ofdensity inhoniogeneities (or clusters)
was first observed in the simulations of thecooling probleni by
Goldhirsch and Zanetti andYoung
and McNaniara[2, 5].
Two differentexplana-
tions have been
put
forward toexplain
this cluster forniation. The first one, found in [2], is to consider this cluster forniation as asecondary instability
of theshearing reginie,
due to thedevelopnient
of teniperature and pressuregradients.
The secondpossible explanation
is that cluster formation isdirectly
related to the linearinstability
of thedensity
modespredicted by hydrodynaniic theory.
In order to characterize
quantitatively
thisclustering reginie,
the structure factorS(k, t)
of the systeni has beenconiputed
as a function of tinie and wavevector. Thecorresponding
dataioo.o
O-O
O-O 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
No~/L~
Fig.
4.Enskog
corrected value of thedecay
time calculatedas a function of
density
for r= 0.98,
compared
to the values obtained in the simulations(N
=
1600).
is shown in
Figure
8. Thegrowth
of thedensity inhoniogeneities
results in the appearance ofa low wavevector
peak
in the structurefactor,
thatrapidly
increases with tinie.According
tohydrodynaniics,
the tiniedependence
ofS(k,t)
should bealgebraic,
I.e.2t(k)
S(k,t)
=
S(k, 0) 1
+
-) (18)
to
so that the ratio
In(S(k,t)) In(S(k,°))
~
~~~~j ~~~j
~~
~
~
)j
should be
independent
of tinie. This ratio isplotted
inFigure
9 as a function of wavevector for different tinies.2((k)
seenis to bereasonably independent
oftinie,
and its low wavevectorvalue appears to be consistent with the
prediction
of linearizedhydrod»namics.
-Thehigh
wavevector deviation can be
explained by
the contaniination of these triodesby
thegrowth
of the
long wavelengths.
Hence thedensity instability
can beinterpreted
asresulting
front a linearinstability
of thehoniogeneous
solution of thehydrodynaniic equations.
Note that itwas
recently
observedby
McNaniara andI"oung
that the"clustering"
fluideventually develops
forlong
times into an ordered flowpattern
of the"shearing" type.
This is also consistentwith
hydrodynamics,
since thegrowth
rate of the transversevelocity
triodes ispositive.
Thedescription
of the forniation of thisshearing
flow in aninhomogeneous systeni, however,
isbeyond
thepossibilities
of linearizedhydrodynaniics.
~ J~
i~ ~ ~o CR~ c~7 #O ~i
c~>~~m
~
~~ ~ ~
xrti~ ~m ~m ~ ~ 4#~lJ ~5~
t~ ~/~*
©#4#©#4#©m4m4m~n~4#
©#zb~~©~~fim Q~~©~©iffi
£F~4m
rS~l~ ~ i~> ~ 4jm~
~t~
~iY1~ ~ / t/ ~
##
~ ~
C~S#o ~
~~/iJ
c~~~
~fi~fi~4>#omfi~fimfi#fi#fiCtfi fiofisfio#fi#fic47#fic#2~fi#fi
Fig.
5. Velocity field in theshearing
regime after the granular medium hasspontaneously
developeda flow pattern
corresponding
to the lowest wave vectorcompatible
with theboundary
conditions.(N
= 1600, p* = 0.I, r =0.92).
5. Inelastic
Collapse
and How to Avoid itThe inelastic
collapse singularity
was first observedby
[3, 6] in siniulations of unidiniensional inelasticsystenis.
Thiscollapse
can be described as the appearance of an infinite nuniber of cor- related collisions between a fewparticles, taking place
in a finite tinie. The sautephenonienon
was observed in two diniensions
by [5].
It was shown that in that case the correlated collisions takeplace
between a sniall nuniber ofessentially aligned particles,
so that the unidiniensionalsituation is
practically reproduced.
In order to avoid this inelastic
collapse,
aslightly
niodified collision rule between theparticles
can be introduced. At each
collision,
the relativevelocity
of the twoparticles
is firstconiputed according
to the usual rule(Eqs. (is, 16)),
then rotatedby
a sniall(less
than 5degrees)
randoni
angle.
This can bejustified by invoking
the unavoidableroughness
of actual solidparticles,
conservation ofangular
nionientunibeing (virtually)
ensuredby
a transfer to the internaldegrees
of freedom of theparticles.
As to inelasticcollapse,
the alai of this niodified collision rule is to hinder the forniation of correlatedparticle
lines that cause thissingularity.
Indeed,
inelasticcollapse
was not observed in the siniulations where this "randoni" collision rule was used, while under the saute conditions asysteni following
the "deterniinistic" collision rulealways
under1N.ent inelasticcollapse (Fig. 10).
Hence inelasticcollapse
appears to be apathology
related to the use ofpurely specular
collision rule betweenparticles,
rather than a characteristic of inelastic fluids.o o o
200.0
~ o
°
~ o
ioo.o
~~0.0
10000.0 20000.0 30000.0 40000.0t /1
Fig.
6.Square
root of the inverse of the temperature versus t in theshearing regime.
The solid lineextrapolates
towards the first moments of the run. There is a substantial deviation from this kineticregime
fit.(N
= 1600, p* = 0.1, r =
0.92).
6. Conclusion and
Perspectives
The niain
objective
of this work was to assess thevalidity
of thehydrodynaniic description
ofgranular
fluidsoriginally proposed by [7],
and of the kinetictheory
calculation of the associatedtransport
coefficients. Thestudy
of theparticularly siniple "cooling
fluid" case and of the associated instabilitiesprovides
an ideal benchniark for thisdescription.
Theconiparison
between nunierical siniulations and theoretical
predictions
in thissiniple
case shows that thetheory
isquantitatively
accurate. A siniilar conclusion was also reached in a recentstudy by
McNaniara andYoung [13],
who showed that the transitions between the differentcooling
reginies
werecorrectly predicted by
thetheory.
The
description
of the inelasticcollapse phenonienon
observedby
McNaniara andYoung
is
obviously beyond
thepossibilities
of kinetictheory
orhydrodynaniics.
It was shown that thisphenonienon
caneasily
be avoidedby introducing
a small amount of randoniness in thecollisions between
particles,
siniilar to what would be causedby
the naturalroughness
ofgranular particles.
Obviously,
a correctdescription
ofgranular
fluids cannot be achieved without aknowledge
of theboundary
conditions that must be used for thehydrodynamic equations.
Theseconditions,
and inparticular
those thatcorrespond
to the veryimportant
case ofvibrating
solidwalls,
arenot known. Their deterniination,
through
thequantitative coniparison
of nunierical siniulation andtheory,
will be thesubject
of future work.o
o o
o
o o
o
o
o
o o
oo o
o o
~ o
° o~
o ~
o o o ~
~~ o o°
~ co
o o o
~ °
o o
~
°
o o~
o°
~
~
o o
o
~ o
° o
o ° ~
o o
~
o o
o
~ o o
Fig.
7. Finalconfiguration (141
collisions perparticle)
of a simulation in the clusterregime. (N
= 1600, p* = 0.25, r =0.6).
Acknowledgments
This ~v"ork was
supported by
the PoleScientifique
de ModAlisationNuni4rique
atENS-Lyon
and the Centre National d'Etudes
Spatiales (Aide 96/CNES /0367).
Appendix
AExpressions
for theTransport
Coefficients and theEquation
of State The Navier-Stokes likeequations describing
agranular
fluid are:Dp
$
" ~P ~ 'V.Dv
~
p
~ Dt '
p~~
= -V
Q
tr(P D) ~T~/~
D
/Dt
is thehydrodynaniic derivative,
D thesyninietrized velocity gradient
tensor, P the stress tensor,Q
the heat flux and ~represents
the rate of energy lost due to inelastic collisions. Thedefinition for these
quantities
is:~
=
~+jv.vj,
S-O
~'~o.o
~~~~
5.o ko
Fig.
8. Evolution of the structure factorduring
cluster formationIN
= 1600, p* = 0.5, r =
0.4).
The curves from the bottom are separated
by
10 collisions per particle. Note thelarge
increase of thestructure factor in the
long wavelength
limit(k
-0).
~ l
bv~
bvjj
" 2
bxj
~bz~
'fl
=
phi
2~t(b (V vi )
,
Q
" -~VT.The various
transport
coefficients andequation
of state arePh =
P'(UlpT,
~t =
p'(u)T~/~pa,
K =
K'(u)T~/~pa,
~ =
~i'(U)~,
where
p', ~t', K',
~f' are functionsonly
of the solid fraction u=
p/ps.
These functions are:
~lj~j
~~+~*s~
~~~~~
~j~
~~
~~ ~
*~~~ ~«'
~~~~~
~j~
~~ ~~
~
*~~~ ~«'
2.0
1-s
j
~l
4
f ~~'°
~
~ Vj
g o
(
~
c ~
fi (
o.5 ° ~ #~
(
~ ~
~
fl ~
o
o-o
n
n -0.5
O-O 0.1 0.2
k a
Fig.
9. Growth exponent of thedensity
field disturbance, obtained from the simulation usingequation (19) (N
= 10000, p* =
0.5,r
=
0.9)
The differentsymbols correspond
to different times(t /to
" 3, 10, 25, 50, 77, 105, 135,
173).
Theprediction
of thehydrodynamic description
of theinstability
is the solid line.
~i'(Ul
=)li-rl),
«
where s~ is defined as
~
j~j il-U)~
*
ii 7u/161'
Appendix
BEnskog Expansion
In the case of a hard core
fluid,
asenii-enipirical
niodification of Boltzniannequation
introducedby Enskog,
widens the range ofapplicability
of the kineticapproach
tohigher
densities[14].
The
Enskog approxiniation
accounts for the finite size of the disks in the collision terni of the Boltzniannequation.
When twoparticles collide,
their centers areseparated by
the dianieter of the disks a. The collision terni of Boltzniannequation
should thus beniultiplied by
theprobability
offinding
twoparticles separated by
a which isproportional
to thepair
correlation function evaluated at a. This correction will have an influence on all thetransport
coefficients.The
validity
of thisapproach
was checked for thecooling
rate ~f in the kineticreginie.
Figure
2 shows successivesnapshots
of thepair
correlation function in the kineticregime.
This function is
essentially
the saute as in a hard core fluid attherniodynaniic equilibriuni
o o o ~q~ cp p
)[j j[°ljj[)oh[iii j@f[j
~
~~°
g
f($~j~~O )/ ~o
o
Oi
°°o ~$~j°°f)°j)ig
~ ~
~iil)ll~°1 l101[)I°I ~i(1~°
~
g ~)
o°w~°° ~° ~§o
°°° Oo~~f
O[ ~o°oo°l
° o ~
~o°o
DODo[°
p ~p+°o
~oj~/$
~~ o
Fig.
10. A system with N= 1600, p*
= 0.25, r = 0.25
obeying
thespecular
collision rulecollapses
after 3. ii collisions per
particle.
The greyparticles
are those involved in the last two hundred collisions.More than 99% of these collisions occur between the
aligned particles.
Under the same conditions. a systemobeying
the modified collision rule does not undergocollapse
after 125 collisions perparticle.
even
though
theteniperature
hasdropped by
a factor 170000 between the first and the lastsnapshot.
Henceg(a)
is assunied to begiven by
the usual virialexpression
~~
= 1 +
2ug(a) PT
Introducing
theequation
of state of an 2d hard disks fluid[15],
theEnskog
correctedcooling
rate to beconies:
1
t0 "
t0Boitz,»a,>nj
9°
a
Ii
U)~4
(1 ~j~ To~/~ (l 7U/16)
V~
The values of the
cooling
rate found in the siniulation areconipared
inFigure
4 with thisprediction.
References
Ill
HerniannH.J., Physica
A 191(1992)
263.[2] Goldhirsch I. and Zanetti
G., Phys.
Rev. Lett. 70(1993)
1619.[3] McNaniara S. and
Young W.R., Phys.
Ft~lids A 4(3) (1992)
[4] McNaniara S. et
Young W-R-, Phys.
F1~lids A5(1) (1993).
[5] McNaniara S. and
Young W-R-, Phys.
Rev. E 50(1994)
R28.[6] Bemu B. and
Mazighi R.,
J.Phys.
A: Math. Gen. 23(1990)
5745.[ii
HaffP.K.,
J. Fluid Mech. 134(1983)
401,[8]
Canipbell
C.S. Ann~l. Rev. F1~lid Mech. 22(1990)
57.[9] Jenkins J.T. and Richnian
M-W-, Phys.
Fluids 28 1985 3585.[10]
Allen M-P- andTidesle» T.E.,Coniputer
siniulation ofLiquids (Oxford University Press,
1987.
[11] McNaniara S.
Phys.
Fluids A5(12) (1993).
[12] Hopkins
M-A- andLouge M.Y., Phys.
F1~lids A 3(1990)
47.[13] McNaniara S. and
Young W.R.,
subniitted toPhys.
Rev. E(1995).
[14]
R6sibois P. and De LeenerM.,
Classical KineticTheory
of Fluids(John Wiley
andSons, 1977).
[15] Henderson