HAL Id: jpa-00231716
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00231716
Submitted on 1 Jan 1980
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of
sci-entific research documents, whether they are
pub-lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.
Deuteron magnetic resonance in liquid crystals : the
interplay of molecular ordering and conformational
changes
B. Deloche, J. Charvolin
To cite this version:
B. Deloche, J. Charvolin. Deuteron magnetic resonance in liquid crystals : the interplay of molecular
ordering and conformational changes. Journal de Physique Lettres, Edp sciences, 1980, 41 (2),
pp.39-42. �10.1051/jphyslet:0198000410203900�. �jpa-00231716�
Deuteron
magnetic
resonancein
liquid
crystals :
the
interplay
of
molecular
ordering
and
conformational
changes
(*)
B. Deloche and J. Charvolin
Laboratoire de Physique des Solides (**), Université de Paris-Sud, 91405 Orsay, France (Re~u le 15 novembre 1979, accepte le 29 novembre 1979)
Résumé. 2014 Un
examen des résultats de résonance magnétique des deutérons dans différents systèmes thermotropes
remet en question
l’interprétation
récemment proposée par Bos et Doane suivantlaquelle
(i) la conformation molé-culairemoyenne
ne change pas avec latempérature,
même aux transitions de phase, et (ii) les mésophases uniaxiales et biaxiales(Smc)
sont respectivement caractérisées par deux et trois paramètres d’ordre.Quelques contre-exemples
indiquent
que cespoints
ne sont pasgénéraux
et, dans certains cas, ambigus. Le rôle des changementsconforma-tionnels ne peut être
négligé.
Abstract. 2014 Examination of deuteron
magnetic
resonance data in differentthermotropic
systems calls into ques-tion the explanation recentlyproposed
by Bos and Doane wherein (i) the average molecular conformation doesnot change with temperature, even at phase transitions, and (ii) uniaxial and biaxial (Smc) mesophases are charac-terized by two and three molecular order parameters, respectively. Some counter-examples indicate that these
points
are notgeneral,
and in some casesambiguities
are present in their analysis. The role of conformationalchanges cannot be
neglected.
ClassificationPhysics Abstracts 61.30; 76.60
The use of deuteron
magnetic
resonance(DMR)
tostudy
the moleculardynamics
ofliquid crystals
has increasedduring
recent years[1-7].
The method isvery
specific :
DMRspectra
of deuteratedliquid
crystals
exhibit well-resolvedquadrupolar
doublets which characterize the motionalaveraged
orientation of each C-D bond in the molecule. With the flexible mesogens studied until now, two contributions to the motionalaveraging
areanticipated :
molecular confor-mationalchanges
and motion of the molecule as awhole. In
general
the number of orientational orderparameters
required
isconsiderably
greater
than the number ofindependent quadrupolar splittings
whichcan be measured. In order to
simplify
thequantitative
interpretation,
acurrently
usedapproximation
is todescribe the molecular orientational order relative to
the director
by
asingle
order tensor S common to theentire mesogen. Then any
splitting bvi
of a deuteronD,
may be
simply expressed
in terms of the differentcomponents
A,B, ...
of this tensor[8] :
bvj(T) = a~(T)
A(T)
+&,(r)
B(T)
+ °(1)
(*) Part of this work has been presented at the Seventh Interna-tional Liquid Crystals Conference (Bordeaux 1978).
(**) Laboratoire associe au C.N.R.S.
where
ai(T), bi(T),
..., are averages over theconfor-mational
changes.
If there are Nindependent
molecu-lar orderparameters,
thenthey
may be extracted from thesplittings
of N + 1 different sites so that onesplitting
may be connected to N othersby
a linearrelationship.
Whenonly
two orderparameters
arerequired,
this linearequation
may be written :where the
conformation
constants c~ and Ckdepend
on the conformational averages, the a’s and b’s.
Following
such anapproach,
Bos and Doane[9]
recently
concluded that theconformation
constants ofcomplex
mesogens areindependent
oftemperature.
They
found that ratioplots,
such as~/5~
vs.~/5~,
are
always straight
lines in asystem
having
nematic,
smectic A and smectic B
phases
(so
that’thetempera-ture
dependence
of onesplitting
can be determinedfrom two
others).
Furthermore adiscontinuity
in thecorresponding
linearratio plot
at a nematic-smecticC transition was
interpreted only
as the manifestationof the need to introduce a third molecular order
parameter.
Thisprocedure
allowed the authors todraw conclusions about the invariance of the average
conformation of the molecule
throughout
the entiremesomorphic
range and thenecessity
ofusing
twoL-40 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE - LETTRES
or three order
parameters
for uniaxial or biaxial(smectic C) mesophases.
One may ask if thissimple
description
is reliable andgeneral, irrespective
of thenature of the mesogen. In this paper we present a
detailed
analysis
of the behaviour of different ratioplots
which conflicts with the Bos and Doaneinter-pretation.
Weemphasize
thecomplexity
ofdynamical
process
underlying
the DMR data ofcurrently
studiedmesogens.
The
proposed
correspondence
[9]
between the symmetry of themesophase
and the number of orderparameters required to
specify
thesplittings bvi(T)
is notgeneral.
This isclearly
illustrated infigure
1 where we have made a ratioplot
(~V2~~1’4
vs.~3/~4),
similar to the one of Ref.
[9], using
the data ontereph-thalidene-di-p-d9-butyl-2,6-d2-aniline
orTBBA-d22
[2].
Theplot
can beapproximated
as astraight
line in the nematic
phase.
However,
adiscontinuity,
well outside of the error limits of the
data,
appearsat the nematic-smectic A transition
(similar
inmagni-tude to the one observed in Ref.
[9]
at the nematic-smectic C transition ofoctyloxybenzoic
acid[10]).
On the otherhand,
theplot
is continuous at the smectic A-smectic C transition.Then,
theimplied
interpretation
is that the number of order parametersFig. 1. - Plot of ratios of deuteron
splittings obtained at different temperatures for TBBA-d22. The indices of the splittings are
asso-ciated with the position of the chain-segment. The inset shows a
sketch of the data (Ref. [2]) from which the splittings were obtained. The magnitude of the indicated error limits results from a statistical
analysis of multiple spectra within the same mesophase.
Fig. 2a) and b). - Two different ratio
plots using splittings obtain-ed from the compound BOBOA-d19 at various temperatures of the uniaxial smectic A and B phases. The indices of the splittings are
associated with the position of the chain-segment.
must be modified at the transition
involving
nophase
symmetry
change,
whereas it remains constant at the transitioninvolving
asymmetry
change.
The number of order
parameters
deduced is notindependent
of the set ofsplittings bv~
used in the ratioplots.
This is illustrated infigure
2 where we have studied the uniaxialsmectic A and B
phases
ofp-butyloxybenzylidene-p-d 1 7-octyl-2,6-p-butyloxybenzylidene-p-d2 -aniline (BOBOA-p-butyloxybenzylidene-p-dI9) [11] using
dif-ferentbvi
in the ratios.Contrasting figures
2a and 2b indicate that the Bos and Doaneapproach
does notyield
consistent results. Consider the smectic Bphase,
for
example.
Two orderparameters
are sufficientaccording
tofigure
2a(the
conclusion in Ref.[9]),
whereas a third one is necessaryaccording
tofigure
2b. Thisdiscrepancy
reflects thedisparate sensitivity
of the ratioplots
to the existence ofmultiple
orderparameters.
The
concept
that the average molecular conforma-tion remainsunchanged
atphase
transitions is not corroborated in some direct observations. Consider the DMR data ofTBBA-d22,
forexample.
As indi-cated in Ref.[2]
(see
also the inset offigure
1),
the deuteronsplittings
of the second and thirdsegment
ofthe chain remain identical
throughout
the smectic A range(bv2(T)
=8v3(T));
onheating
thesystem
intothe nematic
phase,
twoquadrupolar
doublets areobserved
(~(T~) 7~ 8v3(T)).
Thus,
unless one modifies the number of orderparameters,
the appearance of asecond doublet
requires significant changes
in the molecular conformational averages at this smectic A-nematic transition. For thisparticular
case,confor-mational
changes
may be correlated with the transi-tion betweentranslationally
ordered and disorderedstructures. The same
type
ofargument
may also be used for othermesophase
transitions where similar DMR observations have beenreported
[7]
[11].
These difficulties lead us to a critical
analysis
of thelinearity
of ratioplots
such as the one for BOBOApresented
infigure
1 of Ref.[9],
i.e.bv~/bvg
=C2
bv2/bv$
+ C13A
Following
theBos
and Doaneanalysis,
we look forthe best
straight
linefitting
the ratio of the observedsplittings by
means of a linearleast-square regression
over the entiremesomorphic
range. Such astraight
line is found to be characterized
by
the constantsFig. 3. -
Comparison of the experimental and calculated varia-tions of the methyl splitting 8v8(T) of the compound BOBOA-d19. The calculated data were obtained by means of the typical relation
connecting 5vg(7~ to 8v2(?~ and bv,7(T) when the splittings varia-tions are assumed to be governed by two order parameters. The calculation procedure is detailed in the text. The characteristic
spectral linewidth is indicated in the Sm A phase by the vertical bar.
~2
= 0.582 andë8
= - .1.693. Then the obvious testof the
reliability
of this linear fitis,
going
the otherway
round,
to calculate the temperaturedependence
of one of thesplittings using
theexperimental
values of the two others. Weattempt
this process infigure
3for the
methyl splitting ~g(~)
whichpresents
a veryunusual
temperature
dependence [11]. Although
the features of theexperimental
curve arereproduced,
itappears that the calculation does not fit in detail all
the
experimental
data : the observeddiscrepancies,
much
larger
than thespectral
linewidth,
indicate the determined constants72
andc8
differ from the actualconformational coefficients
c2(T )
andc8(T )
whichconnect the considered ratios in a
given
temperature
range. Moreover, if the two constants are
adjusted
to
get
a best fitlocally
(in
thetemperature
range ofany one
mesophase)
thedisparity
between calculatedand observed
8v8(T) persist
in othermesophases.
Theirreversibility
of such aprocedure
shows thatthis
type
ofanalysis
canonly
be considered as arough
approximation
of the realphenomena.
In fact the lack ofsensitivity
of theplot presented by
Bos andDoane to the variations of the c’s arises
mainly
from the use of the very smallsplittings ~g [11]
in thedenominator of the
ratios,
yielding extremely
expand-ed scales.
Figure
3 demonstrates that the ratioplots
cannot be used to exclude
changes
in the average molecular conformation withtemperature
in aquanti-tative
analysis
of~vi(T).
A
precise interpretation
of the present DMR data onthermotropic systems
is not trivial. Since the ordertensor S is
symmetric
andtraceless,
thesplittings
for amesogen molecule of low symmetry should depend
in
principle
on fiveindependent,
non zero orientationalorder
parameters,
irrespective
of the symmetry, uni-axial orbiaxial,
of themesophase
(provided
that themagnetic
field iskept
along
the direction of the meanmolecular
alignment
[12]).
Molecular motions morerapid
than the time scale of DMRexperiments
mayeffectively
increase thesymmetry
of the molecule sothat the number of
required
orderparameters
is reduced. Under these conditions anychange
in this numberthrough
themesomorphic
range isnecessarily
related to achange
in the average molecularsymmetry.
So it seems reasonable toanticipate
that the number and value of additional orderparameters
in agiven
mesophase
might
be different for mesogens fromquite
different chemical structural classes. Thecorrespond-ing
effects on thesplitting 6vi(T) always
appearinextricably convoluted
with conformational terms(ai(T),
bi(T)...
inEq.
(1)).
In view of thesecomplicat-ing
factors,
onesimple
way tointerpret qualitatively
the
changes
in6vi(T)
is to useonly
theprincipal
orderparameter,
Szz,
and to consider that the conformatio-nal averages at different molecular sites aretempera-ture
dependent
[11].
Such adescription
may bejus-tified in first
approximation by
the smallmagnitudes
anticipated
for additional orderparameters.
In the nematicphase,
forexample,
the asymmetry coefficientL-42 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE - LETTRES
AS =
Sxx -
Syy
which has been measured[13]
and estimated[14]
is very smallcompared
toSZZ
[15].
In asingle
orderparameter
approach,
theparticularities
observed in thebvi(T)
atphase
transitions can beattributed in
part
toabrupt
changes
in the value ofSzz
(related
to thethermodynamic
nature of thephase
transition[1])
and tochanges
in the average molecularconformation
(related
tochanges
in the averageorientation of the
long
axis relative to agiven
C-Di
bond
[11]).
These conformationalchanges,
whichmay take
place
in the aromaticpart
as well as in thealiphatic
part
of the mesogen are corroboratedby
other
techniques.
Forexample,
Raman spectroscopyshows that the statistical
weight
of the trans andgauche
states in the end-chains varies within the nematicphase [16].
In addition volumetricmeasure-ments indicate that the mean lateral area per molecule
increases
throughout
the smectic range[17].
Corres-ponding
changes
in the mesogen average conforma-tion would beexpected.
The existence of several order parameters cannot be
ignored
even in uniaxialmesophases.
From theexamples quoted
above it is clear that the use ofratio
plots
does not allow one to determinereliably
the exact number and themagnitude
of the orderparameters.
Athorough analysis necessarily implies
theinvestigation
ofmultiple
interactions on the samechemical group or
rigid
segment
of the mesogenby
means of moresophisticated
techniques
such as theones
recently
developed
in Ref.[13]
and[18].
The authors are very
grateful
to Dr. E. T. Samulski(Storrs,
Connecticut)
and to Professor M. Bloom(U.B.C., Vancouver)
forstimulating
discussions anda critical
reading
of themanuscript.
References
[1] Luz, Z., HEWITT, R. C. and MEIBOOM, S., J. Chem. Phys. 61
(1974) 1758.
[2] DELOCHE, B., CHARVOLIN, J., LIEBERT, L. and STRZELECKI, S., J. Physique Colloq. 36 (1975) C1-21.
[3] EMSLEY, J. W., LINDON, J. C. and LUCKHURST, G. R., Mol.
Phys. 30 (1975) 1913.
[4] DIEHL, P. and TRACEY, A. S., Mol. Phys. 30 (1975) 1917.
[5] BOS, P. J., PIRS, J., UKLEJA, P., DOANE, J. W. and MEUBERT, M. E., Mol. Cryst. and Liq. Cryst. 40 (1977) 59.
[6] DONG, R. Y., TOMBUCK, E., WADE, C. E., VISINTAINER, J. J. and BocK, E., J. Chem. Phys. 66 (1977) 4121.
[7] HSI, S., ZIMMERMAN, H. and Luz, Z., J. Chem. Phys. 69 (1978)
4126.
[8] If a molecular axes system (x, y, z) can be defined, these terms A, B, C... have to be identified with the components S03BC03BD
(03BC, 03BD =
x, y, z) of the order tensor S defined by A. Saupe SAUPE, A., Naturforsh 19 a (1964) 161 .
[9] Bos, P. J. and DOANE, J. W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 1030.
[10] The use of dimerized carboxylic acids to study such subtle
aspects of the smectic-nematic transition should be
questioned ; indeed it is known that the lifetime of these
hydrogen bonded configurations in the nematic phase is controlled by orientational motions of the molecules
(DELOCHE, B. and CABANE, B., Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 19 (1972) 25). This association-dissociation process may be profoundly affected at phase transitions and may in turn, modify the average molecular conformation. [11] DELOCHE, B. and CHARVOLIN, J., J. Physique 37 (1976) 1497.
DELOCHE, B., Thesis, University of Paris-XI, Orsay (1978). [12] Luz, Z. and MEIBOOM, S., J. Chem. Phys. 59 (1973) 275.
(See appendix).
[13] EMSLEY, J. W., LUCKHURST, G. R., GRAY, G. W. and MOSLEY, A., Mol. Phys. 35 (1978) 1499.
[14] VOLINO, F. and DIANOUX, A. J., Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. Lett.
49 (1979) 153.
[15] In fact there is one order of magnitude discrepancy between the values of 0394S deduced from ratio plots (P. J. Bos and J. W. Doane : communication presented at the Seventh
Liquid Crystals Conference, Bordeaux 1978 ; to be publish-ed) and that measured [13].
[16] DESTRADE, C., GUILLON, F. and GASPAROUX, H., Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 36 (1976) 115.
[17] GUILLON, D. and SKOULIOS, A., J. Physique 38 (1977) 79.
[18] HIGGS, T. P. and MACKAY, A. L., Chem. Phys. Lipids 20