• Aucun résultat trouvé

SUBELLIPTIC ESTIMATES FOR OVERDETERMINED SYSTEMS OF QUADRATIC DIFFERENTIAL OPERATORS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "SUBELLIPTIC ESTIMATES FOR OVERDETERMINED SYSTEMS OF QUADRATIC DIFFERENTIAL OPERATORS"

Copied!
38
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-00446465

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00446465

Preprint submitted on 12 Jan 2010

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of

sci-entific research documents, whether they are

pub-lished or not. The documents may come from

teaching and research institutions in France or

abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est

destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents

scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,

émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de

recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires

publics ou privés.

SUBELLIPTIC ESTIMATES FOR

OVERDETERMINED SYSTEMS OF QUADRATIC

DIFFERENTIAL OPERATORS

Karel Pravda-Starov

To cite this version:

Karel Pravda-Starov.

SUBELLIPTIC ESTIMATES FOR OVERDETERMINED SYSTEMS OF

(2)

O F Q U A D R A T IC D IF F E R E N T IA L O P E R A T O R S

K A R E L P R A V D A -ST A R O V

A bstract. W e prove global subelliptic estim ates for system s of quadratic dif-ferentialoperators. Q uadratic di erentialoperators are operators de ned in the W eylquantization by com plex-valued quadratic sym bols. In a previous w ork,w e pointed out the existence ofa particular linear subvector space in the phase space intrinsically associated to their W eylsym bols,called singular space,w hich rules a num ber of fairly general properties of non-elliptic quadratic operators. A bout the subelliptic properties ofthese operators,w e established that quadratic oper-ators w ith zero singular spaces ful ll global subelliptic estim ates w ith a loss of derivatives depending on certain algebraic properties ofthe H am ilton m aps asso-ciated to their W eylsym bols. T he purpose ofthe present w ork is to prove sim ilar global subelliptic estim ates for overdeterm ined system s of quadratic operators. W e establish here a sim ple criterion for the subellipticity of these system s giv-ing an explicit m easure ofthe loss ofderivatives and highlightgiv-ing the non-trivial interactions played by the di erent operators com posing those system s.

1. Introduction

1.1. M iscellaneous facts about quadratic di erential operators. In a recent joint w ork w ith M .H itrik,w e investigated spectraland sem igroup properties ofnon-elliptic quadratic operators. Q uadratic operators are pseudodi erential operators de ned in the W eylquantization

(1.1) qw(x;Dx)u(x)= 1 (2 )n Z R2n ei(x y):q x + y 2 ; u(y)dyd ;

by som e sym bols q(x; ), w ith (x; ) 2 Rn Rn and n 2 N , w hich are com

plex-valued quadratic form s. Since these sym bols are quadratic form s,the corresponding operators in (1.1) are in fact di erential operators. Indeed, the W eyl quantization ofthe quadratic sym bolx ,w ith ( ; ) 2 N2n and j + j= 2,is the di erential

operator

x Dx + Dxx

2 ; Dx= i

1@ x:

O ne can also notice that quadratic di erential operators are a prioriform ally non-selfadjoint since their W eylsym bols in (1.1) are com plex-valued.

C onsidering quadratic operators w hose W eylsym bols have realparts w ith a sign, say here,W eylsym bols w ith non-negative realparts

(1.2) R e q 0;

w e pointed out in [2] the existence of a particular linear subvector space S in the phase space Rn

x Rn intrinsically associated to their W eyl sym bols q(x; ), called

singular space, w hich seem s to play a basic r^ole in the understanding of a num ber

2000 M athem atics Subject C lassi cation. P rim ary: 35B 65;Secondary: 35N 10.

K ey w ords and phrases. Q uadratic di erential operators, overdeterm ined system s, subelliptic estim ates,singular space,W ick quantization.

(3)

offairly generalproperties ofnon-elliptic quadratic operators. M ore speci cally,w e rst proved in [2](T heorem 1.2.1) that w hen the singular space S has a sym plectic structure then the associated heat equation

(1.3) ( @u @t(t;x)+ q w(x;D x)u(t;x)= 0 u(t; )jt= 0= u02 L2(Rn);

is sm oothing in every direction ofthe orthogonalcom plem ent S ? ofS w ith respect

to the canonicalsym plectic form on R2n,

(1.4) (x; );(y; ) = :y x: ; (x; )2 R2n;(y; )2 R2n;

thatis,that,if(x0;0)are som e linearsym plectic coordinateson the sym plectic space S ? then w e have for allt> 0,N 2 N and u 2 L2(Rn),

(1.5) (1 + jx0j2+ j0j2)N we tqw(x;Dx)u 2 L2(Rn):

W e also proved in [2] (See Section 1.4.1 and T heorem 1.2.2) that w hen the W eyl sym bolq ofa quadratic operator ful lls (1.2) and an assum ption ofpartialellipticity on its singular space S in the sense that

(1.6) (x; )2 S; q(x; )= 0 ) (x; )= 0;

then this singular space alw ays has a sym plectic structure and the spectrum of the operator qw(x;D

x) is only com posed of a countable num ber of eigenvalues of nite

m ultiplicity,w ith a sim ilarstructure asthe one established by J.Sjostrand forelliptic quadratic operators in his classical w ork [18]. E lliptic quadratic operators are the quadratic operators w hose sym bols satisfy the condition ofglobalellipticity

(x; )2 R2n; q(x; )= 0 ) (x; )= 0;

on the w hole phase space R2n. Letusrecallhere thatspectralpropertiesofquadratic

operators are playing a basic r^ole in the analysis ofpartialdi erentialoperatorsw ith double characteristics. T his is particularly the case in som e general results about hypoellipticity. W e refer the reader to [4],[18],as w ellas C hapter 22 of[5]together w ith allthe references given there.

In the present paper, w e are interested in studying the subelliptic properties of overdeterm ined system s of non-selfadjoint quadratic operators. T his w ork can be view ed asa naturalextension ofthe analysisled in [17],in w hich w einvestigated in the scalar case the r^ole played by the singular space w hen studying subelliptic properties ofquadratic operators. W e aim here at show ing how the analysis led in this previous w ork can be pushed further w hen dealing w ith overdeterm ined system s ofquadratic operators. W e shallsee that the techniques introduced in [17]are su ciently robust to be extended to the system case and that they turn out to be su ciently sharp to highlight phenom ena of non-trivial interactions betw een the di erent quadratic operators com posing a system . In this paper, w e shall therefore be interested in establishing som e globalsubelliptic estim ates ofthe type

(1.7) h(x; )i2(1 ) wu L2 . N X j= 1 kqwj(x;Dx)ukL2 + kukL2;

w here h(x; )i = (1+ jxj2+ j j2)1=2and > 0;forsystem softhe N quadratic operators

qjw(x;Dx), w ith 1 j N . T he positive param eter > 0 appearing in (1.7) w ill

(4)

holds together w ith an explicit characterization ofthe associated loss ofderivatives. T his loss ofderivatives w illbe characterized in term s ofalgebraic conditions on the H am ilton m aps associated to the W eylsym bols ofthe quadratic operatorscom posing the system .

In this w ork, w e study the subellipticity of overdeterm ined system s in the sense given by P. B olley, J. C am us and J. N ourrigat in [1] (T heorem 1.1). In this sem i-nalw ork,these authorsstudy the m icrolocalsubellipticity ofoverdeterm ined system s ofpseudodi erentialoperators. M ore speci cally,they establish the subellipticity of system s com posed of pseudodi erentialoperators w ith realprincipalsym bols satis-fying the H orm ander-K ohn condition. M ore generally,in the case ofoverdeterm ined system s ofnon-selfadjoint pseudodi erentialoperators,the greatest achievem ents up to now w ere obtained by J. N ourrigat in [8] and [9]. In these tw o m ajor w orks, J.N ourrigatstudies the m icrolocalsubellipticity and m axim alhypoellipticity for sys-tem s ofnon-selfadjointpseudodi erentialoperatorsby the m ean ofrepresentationsof nilpotentgroups. W e shallexplain in the follow ing how the algebraic condition on the H am ilton m aps(1.18)in T heorem 1.2.1 relatesw ith these form erresults. M ore specif-ically,w e shallcom m ent on its link w ith the H orm ander-K ohn condition appearing in [1](T heorem 1.1).

B efore giving the precise statem entofourm ain result,w e shallrecallm iscellaneous notationsaboutquadratic di erentialoperatorsand the resultsobtained in the scalar case. In allthe follow ing,w e consider

qj:Rnx R

n ! C

(x; ) 7! qj(x; );

w ith 1 j N ,N com plex-valued quadratic form s w ith non-negative realparts (1.8) R e qj(x; ) 0; (x; )2 R2n;n 2 N :

W e know from [6](p.425)that the m axim alclosed realization ofa quadratic operator qw(x;Dx) w hose W eyl sym bol has a non-negative real part, i.e., the operator on

L2(Rn) w ith the dom ain

D (q)= u 2 L2(Rn):qw(x;Dx)u 2 L2(Rn) ;

coincides w ith the graph closure ofits restriction to S(Rn),

qw(x;Dx):S(Rn)! S(Rn):

A ssociated to a quadratic sym bolq is the num ericalrange (q) de ned asthe closure in the com plex plane ofallits values

(1.9) (q)= q(Rn

x Rn):

W e also recallfrom [5]thatthe H am ilton m ap F 2 M 2n(C )associated to the quadratic

form q is the m ap uniquely de ned by the identity

(1.10) q (x; );(y; ) = (x; );F (y; ); (x; )2 R2n;(y; )2 R2n;

w here q ; stands for the polarized form associated to the quadratic form q. It directly follow s from the de nition ofthe H am ilton m ap F that its realpart and its im aginary part

R e F = 1

2(F + F ) and Im F = 1

2i(F F );

(5)

respect to . T his is just a consequence of the properties of skew -sym m etry of the sym plectic form and sym m etry ofthe polarized form

(1.11) 8X ;Y 2 R2n; (X ;F Y )= q(X ;Y )= q(Y ;X )= (Y;F X )= (F X ;Y ): A ssociated to the sym bolq,w e de ned in [2]its singular space S as the follow ing intersection ofkernels

(1.12) S =

+ 1\ j= 0

K er R e F (Im F )j \ R2n;

w here the notations R e F and Im F stand respectively for the real part and the im aginary partofthe H am ilton m ap associated to q. N otice thatthe C ayley-H am ilton theorem applied to Im F show s that

(Im F )kX 2 Vect X ;:::;(Im F )2n 1X ; X 2 R2n; k 2 N ;

w here Vect X ;:::;(Im F )2n 1X is the vector space spanned by the vectors X , ...,

(Im F )2n 1X ;and therefore the singularspace isactually equalto the follow ing nite

intersection ofthe kernels

(1.13) S =

2n\ 1 j= 0

K er R e F (Im F )j \ R2n:

C onsidering a quadratic operator qw(x;D

x) w hose W eylsym bol

q :Rnx Rn ! C (x; ) 7! q(x; );

has a non-negative realpart,R e q 0,w e established in [17](T heorem 1.2.1) that w hen itssingularspaceS isreduced to f0g,theoperatorqw(x;D

x)ful llsthefollow ing

globalsubelliptic estim ate

(1.14) 9C > 0;8u 2 D (q); h(x; )i2=(2k0+ 1) wu

L2 C kq

w(x;D

x)ukL2+ kukL2 ; w here k0 stands for the sm allest non-negative integer, 0 k0 2n 1, such that

the intersection ofthe follow ing k0+ 1 kernels w ith the phase space R2n is reduced

to f0g, (1.15) k0 \ j= 0 K er R e F (Im F )j \ R2n = f0g:

N otice that the loss of derivatives = 2k0=(2k0+ 1), appearing in the subelliptic

estim ate (1.14) directly depends on the non-negative integer k0characterized by the

algebraic condition (1.15).

M ore generally, considering a quadratic operator qw(x;D

x) w hose W eyl sym bol

has a non-negative realpart w ith a singular space S w hich m ay di er from f0g,but does have a sym plectic structure in the sense that the restriction of the canonical sym plectic form to S is non-degenerate,w e proved in [17](T heorem 1.2.2)that the operator qw(x;D

x) is subelliptic in any direction ofthe orthogonalcom plem ent S ?

ofthe singularspace w ith respectto the sym plectic form in the sense that,if(x0;0) are som e linear sym plectic coordinates on S ? then w e have

9C > 0;8u 2 D (q); h(x0;0)i2=(2k0+ 1) wu

L2 C kq

w(x;D

(6)

w ith h(x0;0)i = (1 + jx0j2+ j0j2)1=2,w here k

0 stands for the sm allest non-negative

integer,0 k0 2n 1,such that

(1.16) S =

k0 \

j= 0

K er R e F (Im F )j \ R2n:

Finally,w e end these few recalls by underlining that the assum ption about the sym -plectic structure of the singular space is alw ays ful lled by any quadratic sym bolq w hich satis es the assum ption ofpartialellipticity on its singular space S,

(x; )2 S; q(x; )= 0 ) (x; )= 0: W e refer the reader to Section 1.4.1 in [2]for a proofofthis fact.

1.2. Statem ent ofthe m ain result. C onsidering a system ofN quadraticoperators qw

j(x;Dx),1 j N ,w hose W eylsym bols qjhave allnon-negative realparts

(1.17) R e qj(x; ) 0; (x; )2 R2n; n 2 N ;

and denoting by Fjtheir associated H am ilton m aps,the m ain resultcontained in this

article is the follow ing:

T heorem 1.2.1. C onsider a system ofN quadratic operators qjw(x;Dx),1 j N ,

satisfying (1.17). Ifthere exists k02 N such that

(1.18) \ 0 k k0 \ j= 1;:::;N ; (l1;:::;lk)2 f1;:::;N gk K er(R e FjIm Fl1:::Im Flk) \ R 2n = f0g;

then this overdeterm ined system of quadratic operators is subelliptic with a loss of = 2k0=(2k0 + 1) derivatives, that is, that there exists C > 0 such that for all

u 2 D (q1)\ :::\ D (qN), (1.19) h(x; )i2=(2k0+ 1) wu L2 C N X j= 1 kqjw(x;Dx)ukL2+ kukL2 ; with h(x; )i = (1 + jxj2+ j j2)1=2.

(7)

1.3. E xam ple of a subelliptic system of quadratic operators. T he follow ing exam ple of subelliptic system of quadratic operators show s that T heorem 1.2.1 re-ally highlightsnew non-trivialinteraction phenom ena betw een the di erentoperators com posing a system ,w hich cannot be derived from the result ofsubellipticity know n in the scalar case (T heorem 1.2.1 in [17]). Indeed,de ne the quadratic form s

qj(x; )= x21+ 2 1+ i( 2 1+ xj+ 1 1) and ~qj(x; )= x21+ 2 1+ i( 2 1+ j+ 1 1);

for 1 j n 1 and (x; ) 2 R2n,w ith n 2. A direct com putation using (1.10)

and (1.13) show s that the singular space ofthe quadratic form

nX 1 j= 1

( jqj+ ~jq~j);

for som e realnum bers j;~j verifying n 1 X j= 1 ( j+ ~j)> 0; is given by S = n (x; )2 R2n :x1= 1= n 1 X j= 1 ( jxj+ 1+ ~j j+ 1)= 0 o ;

w hich is alw ays a non-zero subvector space. It then follow s that one cannot deduce any result about the subellipticity ofthe scalar operator

n 1

X

j= 1

(jqjw(x;Dx)+ ~jq~wj(x;Dx));

in orderto getthe subellipticity ofthe overdeterm ined system com posed by the 2n 2 operators qw

j(x;Dx) and ~qjw(x;Dx), for 1 j n 1. N evertheless, by denoting

respectively Fjand ~Fj the H am ilton m aps ofthe quadratic form s qjand ~qj,another

direct com putation using (1.10) show s that

K er R e Fj\ K er(R e FjIm Fj)\ R2n = f(x; )2 R2n :x1= 1= xj+ 1= 0g

and

K er R e ~Fj\ K er(R e ~FjIm ~Fj)\ R2n = f(x; )2 R2n :x1= 1= j+ 1= 0g:

O ne can then deduce from T heorem 1.2.1 the follow ing global subelliptic estim ate w ith a loss of2=3 derivatives

h(x; )i2=3 wu

L2 .

n 1

X

j= 1

kqjw(x;Dx)ukL2 + k~qjw(x;Dx)ukL2 + kukL2:

(8)

1.4. C om m ents on the condition for subellipticity. T heorem 1.2.1 gives a very explicit and sim ple algebraic condition on the H am ilton m aps of quadratic opera-tors ensuring the subellipticity of the system . Let us notice that this condition is very easy to handle and allow s to directly m easure the associated loss ofderivatives by a straightforw ard com putation. W e shallnow explain how this is related to the H orm ander-K ohn condition. R ecallfrom [1](T heorem 1.1)thatthe H orm ander-K ohn condition form icrolocalsubellipticity ofoverdeterm ined system sofpseudodi erential operators w ith realprincipal sym bols; reads as the existence of an elliptic iterated com m utator of the operators com posing the system . In the case of a system of non-selfadjoint quadratic operators (qw

j)1 j N, if w e assum e in addition that this

system is m axim alhypoelliptic1,the naturalcondition becom es to ask the ellipticity

of an iterated com m utator of the real parts ((R e qj)w)1 j N and im aginary parts

((Im qj)w)1 j N ofthe operatorscom posing the system . C om ing back to ourspeci c

condition for subellipticity (1.18),w e rst notice that in the scalar case,it reads as the existence ofa non-negative integer k0such that

k0 \

j= 0

K er[R e F (Im F )j] \ R2n = f0g;

w ith F standing for the H am ilton m ap ofthe unique operator qw(x;D

x) com posing

the system . A s recalled in [17](Section 1.2),this condition im plies that,for any non-zero point in the phase space X0 2 R2n,w e can nd a non-negative integer k such

that

8 0 j 2k 1; HIm qj R e q(X0)= 0 and HIm q2k R e q(X0)6= 0;

w here HIm q stands for the H am ilton vector eld ofIm q,

HIm q= @Im q @ @ @x @Im q @x @ @ : T his show s that the 2kthiterated com m utator

[Im qw;[Im qw;[:::;[Im qw;R e qw]]]:::]= ( 1)k(HIm q2k R e q)w;

w ith exactly 2k term s Im qw in left-hand-side ofthe above form ula;is elliptic at X 0;

and underlines the intim ate link betw een (1.18) and the H orm ander-K ohn condition in the scalarcase. In the system case,the situation is m ore com plicated and this link is less obvious to highlight explicitly. M ore speci cally,w e shallsee in this case that the algebraic condition (1.18) im plies that the quadratic form

k0 X k= 0 X j= 1;:::;N ; (l1;:::;lk)2 f1;:::;N g k R e qj(Im Fl1:::Im FlkX );

is positive de nite. T his property im plies that for any non-zero point X02 R2n,one

can nd k 2 N ,j 2 f1;:::;N g and (l1;:::;lk)2 f1;:::;N gk such that

R e qj(Im Fl1:::Im FlkX0)> 0:

B y considering the m inim alnon-negative integer k w ith this property and using the sam e argum ents as the ones developed in [2](p.820-822),one can actually check that any iterated com m utator oforder less or equalto 2k 1,that is,

[P1;[P2;[P3;[:::;[Pr;Pr+ 1]:::]]]];

1W e refer to [8]and [9]for conditions and generalresults of m axim alhypoellipticity for

(9)

w ith r 2k 1,Pl= R e qsw1 or Pl= Im q

w

s2;and w here at least one Pl0 is equalto R e qw

s3, for 1 s1;s2;s3 N ; are not elliptic at X0. O ne can also check that the non-zero term

R e qj(Im Fl1:::Im FlkX0)> 0;

actually appears w hen expanding the W eylsym bolat X0 of the 2kth iterated com

-m utator [Im qlw k;[Im q w lk;[Im q w lk 1;[Im q w lk 1;[:::;[Im q w l1;[Im q w l1;R e q w j]]]:::] = ( 1)k(HIm q2 lk:::H 2 Im ql1R e qj)w:

H ow ever,contrary to the scalar case,there m ay be also other non-zero term s in this expansion;and it is notreally clearifthis naturalcom m utatorassociated to the term

R e qj(Im Fl1:::Im FlkX0); is actually elliptic at X0, HIm q2 lk:::H 2 Im ql1R e qj(X0) ? 6 = 0:

T hough itm ay be di cultto determ ine exactly ateach pointw hich speci c com m uta-tor is elliptic,it is very likely thatcondition (1.18)ensuresthat the H orm ander-K ohn condition is ful lled at any non-zero point ofthe phase space;and that these associ-ated elliptic com m utators are alloforder less or equalto 2k0. It is actually w hat the

loss of derivatives appearing in the estim ate (1.19) suggests; and this in agreem ent w ith the optim allossofderivativesobtained in [1](T heorem 1.1)for2k0com m utators

= 1 1 2k0+ 1

= 2k0 2k0+ 1

;

since w e m easure the loss ofderivatives w ith respect to the elliptic case as

( 2(1 ))wu L2 . N X j= 1 kqw j(x;Dx)ukL2+ kukL2;

w ith 2 = h(x; )i2, because quadratic operators have their W eyl sym bols in the

sym bolclass S( 2; 2dX2) w hose gain is 2.

B ecause ofthe sim plicity ofits assum ptions,T heorem 1.2.1 providesa neatsetting forproving globalsubelliptic estim atesforsystem sofquadratic operators.Itis possi-ble that som e ofthese globalsubelliptic estim ates for system s ofquadratic operators m ay also be derived from the results ofm icrolocalsubellipticity and m axim alhypoel-lipticity proved in [1], [8] and [9]. H ow ever,given a particular system of quadratic operators,one can notice that only checking the H orm ander-K ohn condition in every non-zero point turns out to be quite di cult to do in practice. T he sam e com m ent appliesforchecking the m axim alhypoellipticity ofthe system . A notherinterestofthe approach w e are developing here com es from the fact that the proofofT heorem 1.2.1 is purely analytic and does not require any techniques ofrepresentations ofnilpotent groups as in [8] or [9]. M oreover, despite its length, the proof provided here only involves fairly elem entary argum ents w hose com plexity has no degree ofcom parison w ith the analysis led in [8]and [9].

(10)

doublecharacteristicsobtained in [17](P roposition 2.0.1)hasalready allow ed to derive in [3]the precise asym ptotics for the resolvent norm ofcertain class ofsem iclassical pseudodi erentialoperators in a neighborhood of the doubly characteristic set. O n the other hand, this deeper understanding of non-trivial interactions betw een the di erent quadratic operators com posing overdeterm ined system s m ay also give hints on how to analyze the m ore com plex case ofN by N system s ofquadratic operators, w hich is a topic of current interest. O n that subject, w e refer the reader to the series of recent w orks on non-com m utative harm onic oscillators by A . Parm eggiani and M .W akayam a in [10],[11],[12],[13],[14]and [15].

2. P roof of T heorem 1.2.1

In the follow ing,w e shalluse the notation S m (X )r;m (X ) 2sdX2 ,w here is an open set in R2n,r;s 2 R and m 2 C1 ( ;R

+),to stand for the class ofsym bols a

verifying

a 2 C1 ( ); 8 2 N2n;9C > 0; j@

Xa(X )j C m (X )r sj j; X 2 :

In the case w here = R2n,w e shalldrop the index forsim plicity. W e shallalso use

the notations f . g and f g,on ,for respectively the estim ates 9C > 0,f C g and,f . g and g . f,on .

T he proofofT heorem 1.2.1 w illrely on the follow ing key proposition. C onsidering for 1 j N ,

qj:Rnx Rn ! C

(x; ) 7! qj(x; );

w ith n 2 N ,N com plex-valued quadratic form s w ith non-negative realparts (2.1) R e qj(x; ) 0; (x; ) 2 R2n; 1 j N ;

w e assum e that there exist a positive integer m 2 N and an open set 0in R2n such

that the follow ing sum ofnon-negative quadratic form s satis es

(2.2) 9c0> 0;8X 2 0; m X k= 0 X j= 1;:::;N ; (l1;:::;lk)2 f1;:::;N gk R e qj(Im Fl1:::Im FlkX ) c0jX j 2;

w here the notation Im Fjstands for the im aginary part ofthe H am ilton m ap Fj

as-sociated to the quadratic form qj. U nder this assum ption,one can then extend the

construction ofthe bounded w eight function done in the scalar case in [17](P roposi-tion 2.0.1) to the system case as follow s:

P roposition 2.0.1. If(qj)1 j N are N com plex-valued quadratic form s on R2n

ver-ifying (2.1) and (2.2) then there exist N real-valued weight functions gj2 S 0 1;hX i 2 2m + 1dX2 ; 1 j N ; such that (2.3) 9c;c1;:::;cN > 0;8X 2 0; 1 + N X j= 1 R e qj(X )+ cjHIm qj gj(X ) chX i 2 2m + 1;

(11)

A s in [17],the construction ofthese w eight functions w illbe really the core ofthis w ork.T hisconstruction w illbe an adaptation to the system case ofthe one perform ed in the scalar case.

To check that w e can actually deduce T heorem 1.2.1 from P roposition 2.0.1,w e begin by noticing,as in [17],that the assum ptions ofT heorem 1.2.1 im ply that the follow ing sum ofnon-negative quadratic form s

(2.4) 9c0> 0; r(X )= k0 X k= 0 X j= 1;:::;N ; (l1;:::;lk)2 f1;:::;N gk R e qj(Im Fl1:::Im FlkX ) c0jX j 2 ;

is actually a positive de nite quadratic form . Let us indeed consider X02 R2n such

that r(X0) = 0. T hen,the non-negativity ofquadratic form s R e qj induces that for

all0 k k0,j = 1;:::;N and (l1;:::;lk)2 f1;:::;N gk,

(2.5) R e qj(Im Fl1:::Im FlkX0)= 0:

B y denoting R e qj(X ;Y ) the polar form associated to R e qj, w e deduce from the

C auchy-Schw arz inequality,(1.10) and (2.5) that for allY 2 R2n,

jR e qj(Y ;Im Fl1:::Im FlkX0)j

2= j (Y;R e F

jIm Fl1:::Im FlkX0)j

2

R e qj(Y ) R e qj(Im Fl1:::Im FlkX0)= 0: It follow s that for allY 2 R2n,

(Y;R e FjIm Fl1:::Im FlkX0)= 0;

w hich im plies that for all0 k k0,j = 1;:::;N and (l1;:::;lk)2 f1;:::;N gk,

(2.6) R e FjIm Fl1:::Im FlkX0= 0;

since is non-degenerate. W e nally deduce (2.4) from the assum ption (1.18). In the case w here k0= 0,w e notice that the quadratic form

q = q1+ :::+ qN;

has a positive de nite realpart. T his im plies in particular that q is elliptic on R2n.

O ne can therefore directly deduce from classicalresults about elliptic quadratic dif-ferential operators proved in [18] (See T heorem 3.5 in [18] or com m ents about the elliptic case in T heorem 1.2.1 in [17]),the naturalelliptic a prioriestim ate

9C > 0;8u 2 D (q1)\ :::\ D (qN); h(x; )i2 wu L2 C (kq

w(x;D

x)ukL2 + kukL2); w hich easily im plies (1.19).

W e can therefore assum e in the follow ing that k0 1 and nd from P

roposi-tion 2.0.1 som e real-valued w eight funcroposi-tions (2.7) gj2 S 1;hX i 2 2k 0 + 1dX2 ; 1 j N ; such that (2.8) 9c;c1;:::;cN > 0;8X 2 R2n; 1+ N X j= 1 R e qj(X )+ cjHIm qj gj(X ) chX i 2 2k 0 + 1:

(12)

ofW ick calculus are recalled in Section 4.1. It follow s from (2.7),(4.4),(4.7),(4.8) and the C auchy-Schw arz inequality that

(2.9) N X j= 1 R e qW ick j u;(1 "cjgj)W icku = N X j= 1

R e (1 "cjgj)W ickqjW ick u;u

N X j= 1 k1 "cjgjkL1 kqW ick j ukL2kukL2 . N X j= 1 kqW ickj uk2L2+ kuk2L2 . N X j= 1 k~qwjuk2L2+ kuk2L2; w here (2.10) q~j(x; )= qj x; 2 ;

because the operators (1 "cjgj)W ick w hose W ick sym bol are real-valued, are

for-m ally selfadjoint. Indeed,syfor-m bols r(qj) de ned in (4.8) are here just som e constants

since qj are quadratic form s. T he factor 2 in (2.10) com es from the di erence of

norm alizationschosen betw een (1.1)and (4.9)(See rem ark in Section 4.1). Since from (4.10), (1 "cjgj)W ickqjW ick= h (1 "cjgj)qj+ " 4 cjr gj:r qj " 4i cjfgj;qjg iW ick + Sj;

w ith kSjkL (L2(Rn)). 1,w e obtain from the fact that realH am iltonians getquantized in the W ick quantization by form ally selfadjoint operators that

N X j= 1 R e (1 "cjgj)W ickqjW ick = N X j= 1 R e Sj + N X j= 1 h (1 "cjgj)R e qj+ " 4 cjr gj:r R e qj+ " 4 cjHIm qj gj iW ick ;

because gjare real-valued sym bols. Since R e qj 0 and gj2 L1 (Rn),w e can choose

the positive param eter " su ciently sm allsuch that 8 1 j N ;8X 2 R2n; 1 "cjgj(X )

1 2; in order to deduce from (2.8),(2.9) and (4.3) that

(2.11) (hX i2k 0 + 12 )W icku;u . kuk2

L2+ N X j= 1 k~qjwuk2L2+ N X j= 1 (r gj:r R e qj)W icku;u ;

because from (4.1) and (4.2),1W ick= Id:

O ne can then com plete the proofofT heorem 1.2.1 by follow ing exactly the sam e reasoning as the one used in [17]. W e recall this reasoning here for the sake of com pleteness ofthis w ork.

B y denoting ~X = x; =(2 ) and O pw S(1;dX2) the operators obtained by the W eylquantization ofsym bols in the class S(1;dX 2),it follow s from (4.7),(4.8) and

usualresults ofsym bolic calculus that (2.12) hX i2k 0 + 12 W ick h~X i 2 2k 0 + 1 w 2 O pw S(1;dX2) and (2.13) h~X i 1 2k 0 + 1 w h~X i 1 2k 0 + 1 w h~X i 2 2k 0 + 1 w 2 O pw S(1;dX2) ; since k0 0. B y using that

(13)

w e therefore deduce from (2.11) and the C alderon-Vaillancourt theorem that (2.14) h~X i 1 2k 0 + 1 wu 2 L2 . kuk 2 L2+ N X j= 1 k~qjwuk2L2 + N X j= 1 (r gj:r R e qj)W icku;u :

T hen,w e get from (2.7) and (4.3) that

(2.15) (r gj:r R e qj)W icku;u . jr R e qjjW icku;u :

R ecalling now the w ell-know n inequality

(2.16) jf0(x)j2 2f(x)kf00kL1

(R );

ful lled by any non-negative sm ooth function w ith bounded second derivative, w e deduce from another use of(4.3) that

(2.17) jr R e qjjW icku;u . ((R e qj)

1

2)W icku;u . (1 + R e q

j)W icku;u ;

since R e qj is a non-negative quadratic form and that

2(R e qj)

1

2 1 + R e qj: B y using the sam e argum ents as in (2.9),w e obtain that

(1 + R e qj)W icku;u = (R e qj)W icku;u + kuk2L2 = R e(qW ickj u;u)+ kuk2L2 kqW ickj ukL2kukL2 + kuk2

L2 . kq W ick j uk 2 L2+ kuk 2 L2 . k~q w juk 2 L2 + kuk 2 L2: It therefore follow s from (2.14),(2.15) and (2.17) that

(2.18) h~X i 1 2k 0 + 1 wu 2 L2 . kuk 2 L2+ N X j= 1 k~qwjuk2L2:

In order to im prove the estim ate (2.18), w e carefully resum e our previous analysis and notice that our previous reasoning has in fact established that

h~X i 1 2k 0 + 1 wu 2 L2 . kuk2 L2+ N X j= 1

R e qjW icku;(1 "cjgj)W icku + N X j= 1 (r gj:r R e qj)W icku;u . kuk2 L2+ N X j= 1 R e qW ick j u;(1 "cjgj)W icku + N X j= 1 jR e(qW ick j u;u)j . kuk2 L2+ N X j= 1 R e ~qjwu;(1 "cjgj)W icku + N X j= 1 jR e(~qwju;u)j;

because (1 "cjgj)W ick is a bounded operator on L2(Rn),

(2.19) k(1 "cjgj)W ickkL (L2) k1 "cjgjkL1 (R2n): B y applying this estim ate to h ~X i

1

2k 0 + 1 wu,w e deduce from (2.13)and the C alderon-Vaillancourt theorem that

(14)

T hen,by noticing that the com m utator

(2.21) q~wj; h~X i2k 0 + 11 w 2 O pw S hX i 1

2k 0 + 1;hX i 2dX2 ; because ~qj is a quadratic form ,and that

(2.22) h~X i 1

2k 0 + 1 w h~X i 1

2k 0 + 1 w Id 2 O pw S(hX i 2;hX i 2dX2) ; w e deduce from standard results ofsym bolic calculus and the C alderon-Vaillancourt theorem that ~ qwj; h~X i 1 2k 0 + 1 w u L2 . q~ w j; h~X i 1 2k 0 + 1 w h~X i 1 2k 0 + 1 w h~X i 1 2k 0 + 1 wu L2 + kukL2 . h~X i 1 2k 0 + 1 wu L2 + kukL2: (2.23)

B y introducing this com m utator, w e get from the C auchy-Schw arz inequality and (2.23) that R e ~qwj h~X i2k 0 + 11 wu; h~X i 1 2k 0 + 1 wu . R e ~qjwu; h~X i2k 0 + 11 w h~X i 1 2k 0 + 1 wu + h~X i 1 2k 0 + 1 wu 2 L2 + kuk 2 L2: A notheruse ofthe C auchy-Schw arzinequality and the C alderon-Vaillancourttheorem w ith (2.13) gives that

R e ~qwju; h ~X i 1 2k 0 + 1 w h~X i 1 2k 0 + 1 wu . k~qw jukL2 h~X i 2 2k 0 + 1 wu L2+ k~q w jukL2kukL2: W e then deduce from (2.18) and the previous estim ate that

N X j= 1 R e ~qwj h~X i 1 2k 0 + 1 wu; h~X i 1 2k 0 + 1 wu . h~X i2k 0 + 12 wu L2 N X j= 1 k~qjwukL2+ N X j= 1 k~qwjuk2L2 + kuk2L2:

B y using again the C auchy-Schw arz inequality,(2.18),(2.19),(2.20) and (2.23),this estim ate im plies that

h~X i 2 2k 0 + 1 wu 2 L2 . N X j= 1 R e q~wj; h~X i 1 2k 0 + 1 w u;(1 "cjgj)W ick h~X i 1 2k 0 + 1 wu (2.24) + N X j= 1 R e ~qwju; h~X i2k 0 + 11 w(1 "cjgj)W ick h~X i 1 2k 0 + 1 wu + N X j= 1 k~qwjuk2L2 + kuk2L2 . N X j= 1 R e ~qwju; h~X i 1 2k 0 + 1 w(1 "cjgj)W ick h~X i 1 2k 0 + 1 wu + N X j= 1 k~qwjuk2L2 + kuk2L2 . N X j= 1 k~qwjukL2 h~X i 1 2k 0 + 1 w(1 "cjgj)W ick h~X i 1 2k 0 + 1 wu L2+ N X j= 1 k~qwjuk2L2 + kuk2L2;

(15)

N otice now that (2.7),(4.5) and (4.6) im ply that

h~X i2k 0 + 11 w;(1 "cjgj)W ick 2 O pw S(1;dX2) ;

since (1 "cjgj)W ick= ~gjw,w ith ~gj2 S(1;dX2) and k0 0. B y introducing this new

com m utator,w e deduce from the C alderon-Vaillancourt theorem ,(2.13),(2.18) and (2.19) that h~X i 1 2k 0 + 1 w(1 "cjgj)W ick h~X i 1 2k 0 + 1 wu L2 . h~X i 1 2k 0 + 1 wu L2 + (1 "cjgj)W ick h~X i 1 2k 0 + 1 w h~X i 1 2k 0 + 1 wu L2 . h~X i 1 2k 0 + 1 wu L2 + h~X i 1 2k 0 + 1 w h~X i 1 2k 0 + 1 wu L2 . h~X i2k 0 + 12 wu L2 + h~X i 1 2k 0 + 1 wu L2 + kukL2 . h~X i 2 2k 0 + 1 wu L2 + N X j= 1 k~qjwukL2 + kukL2:

R ecalling (2.24),w e can then use this last estim ate to obtain that

(2.25) h~X i2k 0 + 12 wu 2 L2 . N X j= 1 k~qjwuk2L2+ kuk2L2:

B y nally noticing from the hom ogeneity ofdegree 2 of ~qj that w e have

(~qj T )(x; )=

1

2 qj(x; ); ifT stands for the reallinear sym plectic transform ation

T (x; )= (2 ) 12x;(2 ) 1 2 ;

w e deduce from the sym plectic invariance ofthe W eylquantization (T heorem 18.5.9 in [5]) that hX i2k 0 + 12 wu 2 L2 . N X j= 1 kqjwuk2L2+ kuk2L2;

w hich proves T heorem 1.2.1.

3. P roof of P roposition 2.0.1

W e prove P roposition 2.0.1 by induction on the positive integer m 1 appearing in (2.2). Let m 1,w e shallassum e that P roposition 2.0.1 is ful lled for any open set 0ofR2n,w hen the positive integer in (2.2) is strictly sm aller than m .

In the follow ing,w e denote by , and w som e C1 (R ;[0;1])functionsrespectively

satisfying

(3.1) = 1 on [ 1;1]; supp [ 2;2];

(3.2) = 1 on fx 2 R :1 jxj 2g; supp fx 2 R :1=2 jxj 3g; and

(3.3) w = 1 on fx 2 R :jxj 2g; supp w fx 2 R :jxj 1g:

M ore generically,w e shalldenote by j, jand wj,j 2 N ,som e other C1 (R ;[0;1])

(16)

Let 0 be an open setofR2n such that(2.2) is ful lled. C onsidering the quadratic form s (3.4) r~1;p(X )= N X j= 1 R e qj(X ;Im FpX ); (3.5) r~k;p(X )= X j= 1;:::;N (l1;:::;lk 1)2 f1;:::;N gk 1

R e qj(Im Fl1:::Im Flk 1X ;Im Fl1:::Im Flk 1Im FpX );

for any 1 p N ,2 k m ; (3.6) r0(X )= N X j= 1 R e qj(X ); rk(X )= X j= 1;:::;N (l1;:::;lk)2 f1;:::;N gk R e qj(Im Fl1:::Im FlkX );

for any 1 k m ;and de ning

(3.7) ~gm ;p(X )= rm 1(X )hX i 2 (2m 1 ) 2m + 1 hX i 4m 2m + 1r~ m ;p(X );

w here is the function de ned in (3.1) and 1 p N ,w e get from Lem m a 4.2.1 that HIm qp g~m ;p(X )= 2 rm 1(X )hX i 2 (2m 1 ) 2m + 1 X j= 1;:::;N (l1;:::;lm 1)2 f1;:::;N gm 1 R e qj(Im Fl1:::Im Flm 1Im FpX ) hX i2m + 14m (3.8) + 2 rm 1(X )hX i 2 (2m 1 ) 2m + 1 X j= 1;:::;N (l1;:::;lm 1)2 f1;:::;N gm 1

R e qj(Im Fl1:::Im Flm 1X ;Im Fl1:::Im Flm 1(Im Fp)

2X ) hX i2m + 14m + HIm qp rm 1(X )hX i 2 (2m 1 ) 2m + 1 ~rm ;p(X ) hX i2m + 14m + rm 1(X )hX i 2 (2m 1 ) 2m + 1 H Im qp hX i 4m 2m + 1 ~r m ;p(X ): W e rst check that (3.9) ~gm ;p2 S 1;hX i 2 (2m 1 ) 2m + 1 dX2 :

In order to verify this,w e notice from Lem m a 4.2.6 that the quadratic form s (3.10) R e qj(Im Fl1:::Im Flm 1X ;Im Fl1:::Im Flm 1Im FpX ) and

(3.11) R e qj(Im Fl1:::Im Flm 1X ;Im Fl1:::Im Flm 1(Im Fp)

2X );

belong to the sym bolclass

(3.12) S hX i2m + 14m ;hX i 2 (2m 1 )

2m + 1 dX2 ; for any open set in R2n w here r

m 1(X ) . hX i

2 (2m 1 )

2m + 1 . To check this,w e just use in addition to Lem m a 4.2.6 the obvious estim ates

R e qj(Im Fl1:::Im Flm 1Im FpX ) 1

2 . hX i and

R e qj(Im Fl1:::Im Flm 1(Im Fp)

(17)

w e obtain (3.9) from (3.1),(3.5),(3.6),(3.7),(3.10),(3.12) and Lem m a 4.2.2. D enoting respectively A1;p, A2;p, A3;p and A4;p the four term s appearing in the

righthand sideof(3.8),w e rstnoticefrom (3.1),(3.10),(3.12),(3.13)and Lem m a 4.2.2 that

(3.14) A2;p2 S 1;hX i

2 (2m 1 ) 2m + 1 dX2 : N ext,by using that

Im qp2 S hX i2;hX i 2dX2 ;

since Im qp is a quadratic form ,w e get from (3.1),(3.5),(3.6),(3.10),(3.12),(3.13)

and Lem m a 4.2.2 that

(3.15) A3;p2 S hX i 2 2m + 1;hX i 2 (2m 1 ) 2m + 1 dX2 ; since HIm qp rm 1(X )hX i 2 (2m 1 ) 2m + 1 2 S hX i 2 2m + 1;hX i 2 (2m 1 ) 2m + 1 dX2 : B y using now that

HIm qp hX i 4m

2m + 1 2 S hX i 4m

2m + 1;hX i 2dX2 ;

w e nally obtain from anotheruse of(3.1),(3.5),(3.6),(3.10),(3.12)and Lem m a 4.2.2 that

(3.16) A4;p2 S 1;hX i

2 (2m 1 ) 2m + 1 dX2 : Since the term A3;p is supported in

supp 0rm 1(X )hX i

2 (2m 1 ) 2m + 1 ;

w e deduce from (3.8), (3.14), (3.15) and (3.16) that there exists 0 a C1 (R ;[0;1])

function satisfying sim ilar properties as in (3.2),w ith possibly di erent positive nu-m ericalvalues for its support localization,such that,9c1;c2> 0,8X 2 R2n,

c1+ c2 0 rm 1(X )hX i 2 (2m 1 ) 2m + 1 hX i 2 2m + 1 + N X p= 1 HIm qp g~m ;p(X ) (3.17) 2 rm 1(X )hX i 2 (2m 1 ) 2m + 1 rm(X ) hX i2m + 14m :

R ecalling (2.2),one can nd som e positive constants c3;c4> 0 such that

(3.18)

mX 1 k= 0

rk(X ) c3jX j2;

on the open set

(3.19) 1= X 2 R2n :rm (X )< c4jX j2 \ 0:

W hen m 2, one can nd according to our induction hypothesis som e real-valued functions (3.20) ~gm ;p2 S 1 1;hX i 2 2m 1dX2 ; 1 p N ; such that (3.21) 9c5;p> 0;8X 2 1; 1 + N X p= 1 R e qp(X )+ c5;pHIm qp ~gm ;p(X ) & hX i 2 2m 1: For convenience,w e set in the follow ing ~g1;p= 0 w hen m = 1. B y choosing suitably

(18)

respectively de ned in (3.1)and (3.3),w ith possibly di erentpositivenum ericalvalues for their support localizations,such that

(3.22) supp 0 rm(X )jX j2 w0(X ) X 2 R2n :rm (X )< c4jX j2 ;

and setting

(3.23) Gm ;p(X )= ~gm ;p(X )+ 0 rm (X )jX j2 w0(X )~gm ;p(X ); X 2 0;

w e deduce from a straightforw ard adaptation of the Lem m a 4.2.2 by recalling (3.1) and (3.3) that

(3.24) 0 rm (X )jX j2 w0(X )2 S 1;hX i 2dX2 :

A ccording to (3.9) and (3.20),this im plies that (3.25) G1;p2 S 0 1;hX i 2 3dX2 and G m ;p2 S 0 1;hX i 2 2m 1dX2 ; w hen m 2. Since from (3.24),

HIm qp 0 rm(X )jX j

2 w

0(X ) 2 S 1;hX i 2dX2 ;

because Im qp is a quadratic form ,w e rst notice from (3.19),(3.20) and (3.22) that

HIm qp 0 rm (X )jX j

2 w

0(X ) ~gm ;p(X )2 S 0 1;hX i 2

2m 1dX2 ;

and then deduce from (3.17),(3.19),(3.21),(3.22) and (3.23) that there exist som e positive contants c6;p;c7> 0 such that for allX 2 0,

N X p= 1 R e qp(X )+ c6;pHIm qp Gm ;p(X ) + 1 + c7 0 rm 1(X )hX i 2 (2m 1 ) 2m + 1 hX i 2 2m + 1 & rm 1(X )hX i 2 (2m 1 ) 2m + 1 rm (X ) hX i2m + 14m + 0 rm (X )jX j2 w0(X )hX i 2 2m 1; w hen m 2. Since hX i2m2 1 & hX i 2 2m + 1 and rm(X ) hX i2m + 14m & jX j 2 2m + 1;

w hen rm(X ) & jX j2, w e deduce from the previous estim ate by distinguishing the

regions in 0w here

rm(X ). jX j2 and rm (X )& jX j2;

according to the support ofthe function

0 rm (X )jX j2 ;

that one can nd a C1 (R ;[0;1]) function w1 w ith the sam e kind ofsupport as the

function de ned in (3.3) such that

(3.26) 9c8;p;c9> 0;8X 2 0; N X p= 1 R e qp(X )+ c8;pHIm qp Gm ;p(X ) + c9w1 rm 1(X )hX i 2 (2m 1 ) 2m + 1 hX i 2 2m + 1 + 1 & hX i 2 2m + 1; w hen m 2. W hen m = 1,w e notice from (2.2) that

(3.27) r1(X )& hX i2;

on any set w here

(19)

if the positive constant c10 is chosen su ciently large. M oreover,since in this case

G1;p= ~g1;p and that R e qp 0,one can deduce from (3.1),(3.3),(3.17),(3.27) and

(3.28),by distinguishing the regions in 0 w here

r0(X ). hX i 2 3 and r 0(X )& hX i 2 3; according to the support ofthe function

r0(X )hX i

2 3 ;

that the estim ate (3.26) is also ful lled in the case m = 1. C ontinuing our study of the case w here m = 1,w e notice from (3.3) and R e qp 0,that one can estim ate

w1 r0(X )hX i 2 3 hX i 2 3 . r0(X )= N X p= 1 R e qp(X );

for all X 2 R2n. It therefore follow s that one can nd c

11;p > 0 such that for all

X 2 0, N X p= 1 R e qp(X )+ c11;pHIm qpG1;p(X ) + 1 & hX i 2 3;

w hich provesP roposition 2.0.1 in the case w here m = 1,and ourinduction hypothesis in the basis case.

A ssum ing in the follow ing that m 2,w e shallnow w ork on the term w1 rm 1(X )hX i

2 (2m 1 ) 2m + 1 hX i

2 2m + 1;

appearing in (3.26). B y considering som e constants j 1,for 0 j m 2,w hose

values w illbe successively chosen in the follow ing,w e shallprove that one can w rite that for allX 2 R2n,

(3.29) w1 rm 1(X ) hX i 2 (2m 1 ) 2m + 1 ! ~ W0(X ) 0(X ) + mX 2 j= 1 ~ W0(X ) j Y l= 1 Wl(X ) j(X )+ ~W0(X ) mY 1 l= 1 Wl(X ) ; w ith (3.30) j(X )= jrm j 2(X ) rm j 1(X ) 2m 2j 3 2m 2j 1 ! ; 0 j m 2; (3.31) Wj(X )= w2 j 1rm j 1(X ) rm j(X ) 2m 2j 1 2m 2j+ 1 ! ; 1 j m 1; (3.32) W~0(X )= w1 rm 1(X ) hX i2 (2m2m + 11 ) ! ; w here istheC1 (R ;[0;1])function de ned in (3.1),and w

2isa C1 (R ;[0;1])function

satisfying sim ilar properties as the function de ned in (3.3), w ith possibly di erent positive num ericalvalues for its support localization,in order to have that

(3.33) supp 0 w2= 1 and supp w20 = 1 :

(20)

on the support ofthe function

supp ~W0 j

Y

l= 1

Wl ; if1 j m 1; or,supp ~W0; ifj = 0:

N otice that the constants in the estim ates (3.34) only depend on the values of the param eters 0,...,j 1 but not on l,w hen l j. T his show s that the functions

0; j Y l= 1 Wl j; for 1 j m 2; and mY 1 l= 1 Wl;

are w ell-de ned on the support of the function ~W0. N ow , by noticing from (3.1),

(3.3),(3.30),(3.31) and (3.33) that

(3.35) 1 j+ Wj+ 1;

on the support ofthe function

supp ~W0 j

Y

l= 1

Wl ; if1 j m 2; or,supp ~W0; ifj = 0;

w e deduce the estim ate (3.29) from a nite iteration by using the follow ing estim ates ~ W0 W~0 0+ ~W0W1 and ~ W0 j Y l= 1 Wl W~0 j Y l= 1 Wl j+ ~W0 j+ 1Y l= 1 Wl ;

for any 1 j m 2. O ne can also notice that (3.35) im plies that

(3.36) 1 j+ mX 2 k= j+ 1 k Y l= j+ 1 Wl k+ mY 1 l= j+ 1 Wl;

on the support ofthe function

supp ~W0 j

Y

l= 1

Wl ; if1 j m 2; or,supp ~W0; ifj = 0:

Since R e qp 0,w e then get from (3.34) that

(3.37) 8X 2 R2n; ~W 0(X ) mY 1 l= 1 Wl(X ) hX i 2 2m + 1 ~a 0;:::;m 2 N X p= 1 R e qp(X );

(21)

w here the quadratic form s ~rk;p are de ned in (3.4) and (3.5). W e get from (3.1),

(3.3), (3.30), (3.31), (3.32), (3.34), Lem m a 4.2.2, Lem m a 4.2.4, Lem m a 4.2.5 and Lem m a 4.2.7 that

(3.40) pj;p2 S 1;hX i

2 (2m 2j 3 ) 2m + 1 dX2 :

for any 0 j m 2.

W e shall now study the Poisson brackets HIm qppj;p. In doing so, w e begin by w riting that HIm qppj;p(X )= HIm qpW~0 (X ) j Y l= 1 W l(X ) j(X ) ~ rm j 1;p(X ) rm j 1(X ) 2m 2j 2 2m 2j 1 (3.41) + ~W0(X ) j Y l= 1 Wl(X ) HIm qp j (X ) ~ rm j 1;p(X ) rm j 1(X ) 2m 2j 2 2m 2j 1 + ~W0(X ) j Y l= 1 Wl(X ) j(X )HIm qp rm j 1(X ) 2m 2j 2 2m 2j 1 r~ m j 1;p(X ) + ~W0(X ) j Y l= 1 Wl(X ) j(X ) HIm qpr~m j 1;p(X ) rm j 1(X ) 2m 2j 2 2m 2j 1 + j X l= 1 ~ W0(X ) HIm qpWl (X ) j Y k = 1 k 6=l Wk(X ) j(X ) ~ rm j 1;p(X ) rm j 1(X ) 2m 2j 2 2m 2j 1 ;

for 1 j m 2. W e denote by respectively B1;j;p,B2;j;p,B3;j;p,B4;j;p and B5;j;p

the ve term s appearing in the right hand side of (3.41). W e also w rite in the case w here j = 0, HIm qpp0;p(X )= HIm qpW~0 (X ) 0(X ) ~ rm 1;p(X ) rm 1(X ) 2m 2 2m 1 (3.42) + ~W0(X ) HIm qp 0 (X ) ~ rm 1;p(X ) rm 1(X ) 2m 2 2m 1 + ~W0(X ) 0(X )HIm qp rm 1(X ) 2m 2 2m 1 r~ m 1;p(X ) + ~W0(X ) 0(X ) HIm qpr~m 1;p(X ) rm 1(X ) 2m 2 2m 1 ;

and denote as before by respectively B1;0;p,B2;0;p,B3;0;p and B4;0;p the four term s

appearing in the right hand side of(3.42).

Since the constantsin the estim ates(3.34)only depend on the valuesofthe param -eters 0,..., j 1;but not on l,w hen l j;w e notice from (3.29),(3.34) and (3.37)

that there exist a0 > 0 and som e positive constants aj;0;:::;j 1,for 1 j m 1, w hose valuesw ith respectto the param eters( l)0 l m 2only depend on 0,..., j 1;

(22)

and X 2 R2n, w1 rm 1(X ) hX i2 (2m2m + 11 ) ! hX i2m + 12 a 0W~0(X ) 0(X )rm 1(X ) 1 2m 1 (3.43) + mX 2 j= 1 jaj;0;:::;j 1W~0(X ) j Y l= 1 W l(X ) j(X )rm j 1(X ) 1 2m 2j 1 + am 1; 0;:::;m 2 N X p= 1 R e qp(X ):

T hepositiveconstanta0isindependentofany ofthe param eters( l)0 l m 2. Setting

(3.44) pp= a0p0;p+ mX 2

j= 1

jaj; 0;:::; j 1pj;p; w e know from (3.40) that

(3.45) pp2 S 1;hX i

2

2m + 1dX2 :

Forany " > 0,w e shallprove thataftera properchoice forthe constants( j)0 j m 2

and ( j)1 j m 2,w ith j 1, j 1,w hose values w illdepend on ";one can nd

a positive constant c12;"> 0 such that for allX 2 R2n,

(3.46) c12;" N X p= 1 R e qp(X )+ HIm qppp(X ) + "hX i 2 2m + 1 w 1 rm 1(X ) hX i 2 (2m 1 ) 2m + 1 ! hX i2m + 12 :

O nce this estim ate proved,P roposition 2.0.1 w illdirectly follow from (3.25),(3.26), (3.45)and (3.46),ifw e choose the positive param eter" su ciently sm alland consider the w eight functions

gp= c13;"Gm ;p+ c14;"pp; 1 p N ;

after a suitable choice for the positive constants c13;"and c14;".

Let " > 0, it therefore rem ains to choose properly these constants ( j)0 j m 2

and ( j)1 j m 2,w ith j 1, j 1,in order to satisfy (3.46).

R ecalling from (4.22) that for all1 p N and 0 s m 2, (3.47) HIm qp~rm s 1;p(X )= 2 X j= 1;:::;N (l1;:::;lm s 2)2 f1;:::;N gm s 2 R e qj(Im Fl1:::Im Flm s 2Im FpX ) + 2 X j= 1;:::;N (l1;:::;lm s 2)2 f1;:::;N gm s 2

R e qj(Im Fl1:::Im Flm s 2X ;Im Fl1:::Im Flm s 2(Im Fp)

2

X );

one can notice by expanding the term

2am 1;0;:::;m 2 N X p= 1 R e qp+ N X p= 1 HIm qppp;

by using (3.41),(3.42) and (3.44) that the term s in

(23)

produced by the term s associated to X

j= 1;:::;N

(l1;:::;lm s 2)2 f1;:::;N gm s 2

R e qj(Im Fl1:::Im Flm s 2Im FpX );

w hile using (3.47),give exactly tw o tim es the term a0W~0(X ) 0(X )rm 1(X ) 1 2m 1 (3.48) + mX 2 j= 1 jaj;0;:::;j 1W~0(X ) j Y l= 1 Wl(X ) j(X )rm j 1(X ) 1 2m 2j 1 + am 1; 0;:::; m 2 N X p= 1 R e qp(X );

for w hich w e have the estim ate (3.43). To prove the estim ate (3.46),it w illtherefore be su cient to check that allthe other term s appearing in (3.41) and (3.42) can also be allabsorbed in the term (3.48)aftera properchoice forthe constants( j)0 j m 2

and ( j)1 j m 2;at the exception ofa rem ainder term in

"hX i2m + 12 :

W e shallchoose these constants in the follow ing order 0, 1, 1, 2,...., m 2 and m 2.

W e successively study the rem aining term sin (3.41)and (3.42),by increasing value ofthe integer 0 j m 2. W e rst notice from (3.1),(3.3),(3.30),(3.32),(3.42), Lem m a 4.2.8 and Lem m a 4.2.12 that one can choose the rst constant 0 1 such

that for allX 2 R2n,

(3.49) a0 N X p= 1 jB1;0;p(X )j. 1 2 0 hX i 2 2m + 1 " m 1hX i 2 2m + 1:

B y noticing from (3.34) that the estim ates (3.50) rm(X ). hX i2. rm 1(X )

2m + 1 2m 1;

are ful lled on the supportofthe function ~W0,w e deduce from (3.1),(3.30)and (3.42)

that the m odulus ofthe term s B3;0;p can be estim ated as

a0 N X p= 1 jB3;0;p(X )j= a0 N X p= 1 rm 1(X ) 2m 2 2m 1H Im qp rm 1(X ) 2m 2 2m 1 rm 1(X ) 2m 2 2m 1r~ m 1;p(X ) ~W0(X ) 0(X ) . 1 2 0 W~0(X ) 0(X )rm 1(X ) 1 2m 1;

for allX 2 R2n; since from Lem m a 4.2.8 and Lem m a 4.2.10,w e have for any p in

f1;:::;N g that rm 1(X ) 2m 2 2m 1H Im qp rm 1(X ) 2m 2 2m 1 . rm 1(X ) 1 2m 1 and rm 1(X ) 2m 2 2m 1r~ m 1;p(X ) . 1 2 0 ;

on the support ofthe function ~W0(X ) 0(X ):B y possibly increasing su ciently the

value of the constant 0 w hich is of course possible w hile keeping (3.49), one can

(24)

N ext,w e deduce from (3.1),(3.30),(3.42),(3.50) and Lem m a 4.2.9 that the m od-ulus ofthe second term s in B4;0;p associated to

2 X

j= 1;:::;N (l1;:::;lm 2)2 f1;:::;N gm 2

R e qj(Im Fl1:::Im Flm 2X ;Im Fl1:::Im Flm 2(Im Fp)

2

X );

w hile using (3.47),denoted here ~B4;0;p, N X p= 1 ~ B4;0;p(X )= ~W 0(X ) 0(X ) N X p= 1 0 B B @ HIm qpr~m 1;p(X ) rm 1(X ) 2m 2 2m 1 2 X j= 1;:::;N (l1;:::;lm 2)2 f1;:::;N gm 2 R e qj(Im Fl1:::Im Flm 2Im FpX ) rm 1(X ) 2m 2 2m 1 1 C C A ; = ~W0(X ) 0(X ) N X p= 1 HIm qp~rm 1;p(X ) rm 1(X ) 2m 2 2m 1 2rm 1(X ) 1 2m 1 !

can be estim ated as a0 N X p= 1 j~B4;0;p(X )j. 1 2 0 W~0(X ) 0(X )rm 1(X ) 1 2m 1;

for all X 2 R2n. B y possibly increasing su ciently the value of the constant 0

w hich is ofcourse possible w hile keeping (3.49),one can also controlthis term w ith the \good" term (3.48). T he value of the constant 0 is now de nitively xed. In

(3.42),it only rem ains to study the term s B2;0;p.

A bout these term s,w e deduce from (3.1),(3.30),(3.42),(3.50),Lem m a 4.2.8 and Lem m a 4.2.11 that for allX 2 R2n,

(3.51) a0 N X p= 1 jB2;0;p(X )j. ~W0(X )W 1(X )rm 1(X ) 1 2m 1:

B y using now (3.34) and (3.36) w ith j = 1,w e obtain that for allX 2 R2n,

a0 N X p= 1 jB2;0;p(X )j cm 1;0;:::;m 2W~0(X ) mY 1 l= 1 Wl(X ) N X p= 1 R e qp(X ) + mX 2 j= 1 cj; 0;:::;j 1W~0(X ) j Y l= 1 Wl(X ) j(X )rm j 1(X ) 1 2m 2j 1; w hich im plies that

(3.52) a0 N X p= 1 jB2;0;p(X )j cm 1;0;:::;m 2 N X p= 1 R e qp(X ) + mX 2 j= 1 cj; 0;:::;j 1W~0(X ) j Y l= 1 Wl(X ) j(X )rm j 1(X ) 1 2m 2j 1; w here the quantities cj; 0;:::;j 1 stand for positive constants w hose values depend on 0,..., j 1,but not on ( k)j k m 2 and ( k)1 k m 2;according to the rem ark

done after (3.34). O ne can therefore choose the constant 1 1 in (3.44) su ciently

(25)

hand side ofthe estim ate (3.52)by the term ofsam e index in the \good" term (3.48). T his is possible since the constants a1;0 and c1; 0 are now xed after our choice of the param eter 0.

T his ends our step index j = 0 in w hich w e have chosen the values for the tw o constants 0and 1 1. W e shallnow explain how to choosethe rem aining constants

( j)1 j m 2 and ( j)2 j m 2 in (3.44) in order to satisfy (3.46). T his choice w ill

also determ ine the values ofthe constants (aj;0;:::; j 1)1 j m 2appearing in (3.44). A fter this step index j = 0,w e have m anaged to absorb allthe term s appearing in (3.42) in the \good" term (3.48) at the exception ofa rem ainder com ing from (3.49) and (3.52), mX 2 j= 2 cj;0;:::;j 1W~0(X ) j Y l= 1 Wl(X ) j(X )rm j 1(X ) 1 2m 2j 1 + " m 1hX i 2 2m + 1;

w here one recallthat the positive constants cj; 0;:::;j 1 only depend on 0,..., j 1, but not on ( k)j k m 2 and ( k)1 k m 2:

W e proceed in the follow ing by nite induction and assum e that,at the beginning ofthe step index k,w ith 1 k m 2,w e have already chosen the values for the constants ( j)0 j k 1 and ( j)1 j k in (3.44);and that these choices have allow ed

to absorb allthe term s appearing in the right hand side of (3.42) and (3.41),w hen 1 j k 1,in the \good" term (3.48) at the exception ofa rem ainder term

(3.53) k m 1"hX i 2 2m + 1+ mX 2 j= k+ 1 ~ cj;0;:::;j 1;1;:::;k 1W~0(X ) j Y l= 1 Wl(X ) j(X )rm j 1(X ) 1 2m 2j 1;

w here the quantities ~cj; 0;:::;j 1; 1;:::;k 1 stand for positive constants w hose values only depend on 0,..., j 1, 1,..., k 1;but not on ( l)j l m 2 and ( l)k l m 2.

W e shallnow explain how to choose the constants k and; k+ 1,w hen k m 3;

in this step index k in order to absorb the term s appearing in the right hand side of (3.41),w hen j = k,at the exception ofa rem ainder term ofthe type (3.53) w here k w illbe replaced by k + 1;in the \good" term (3.48). Since the constants( j)0 j k 1

and ( j)1 j k have already been chosen,w e shallonly underline in the follow ing the

dependence ofour estim ates w ith respect to the other param eters ( j)k j m 2 and

( j)k+ 1 j m 2,w hose values rem ain to be chosen.

W e notice from (3.1),(3.30),(3.31),(3.32),(3.34),(3.41),Lem m a 4.2.8 and Lem m a 4.2.12 that one can assum e by choosing the constant k 1 su ciently large that

for allX 2 R2n, (3.54) kak;0;:::;k 1 N X p= 1 jB1;k;p(X )j. 1 2 k hX i 2 2m + 1 " m 1hX i 2 2m + 1;

(26)

N ext,w e deduce from (3.1),(3.30),(3.34)and (3.41)thatthe m odulusofthe term s B3;k;pcan be estim ated as

kak;0;:::;k 1 N X p= 1 jB3;k;p(X )j = kak;0;:::;k 1 N X p= 1 rm k 1(X ) 2m 2k 2 2m 2k 1H Im qp rm k 1(X ) 2m 2k 2 2m 2k 1 rm k 1(X ) 2m 2k 2 2m 2k 1r~ m k 1;p(X ) ~W0(X ) k Y l= 1 Wl(X ) k(X ) . 1 2 k W~0(X ) k Y l= 1 Wl(X ) k(X )rm k 1(X ) 1 2m 2k 1;

for allX 2 R2n; since from Lem m a 4.2.8 and Lem m a 4.2.10,w e have for any p in

f1;:::;N g that rm k 1(X ) 2m 2k 2 2m 2k 1H Im qp rm k 1(X ) 2m 2k 2 2m 2k 1 . rm k 1(X ) 1 2m 2k 1 and rm k 1(X ) 2m 2k 2 2m 2k 1r~ m k 1;p(X ) . 1 2 k ;

on the support ofthe function

~ W0(X ) k Y l= 1 Wl(X ) k(X ):

B y possibly increasing su ciently the value of the constant k w hich is of course

possible w hile keeping (3.54),one can controlthis term w ith the \good" term (3.48). N ext,w e deduce from (3.1),(3.30),(3.34),(3.41) and Lem m a 4.2.9 that the m od-ulus ofthe second term s in B4;k;p associated to

2 X

j= 1;:::;N (l1;:::;lm k 2)2 f1;:::;N g

m k 2

R e qj(Im Fl1:::Im Flm k 2X ;Im Fl1:::Im Flm k 2(Im Fp)

2X );

w hile using (3.47),denoted here ~B4;k;p, N X p= 1 ~ B4;k;p(X )= ~W0(X ) k Y l= 1 Wl(X ) k(X ) N X p= 1 0 B B @ HIm qpr~m k 1;p(X ) rm k 1(X ) 2m 2k 2 2m 2k 1 2 X j= 1;:::;N (l1;:::;lm k 2)2 f1;:::;N gm k 2 R e qj(Im Fl1:::Im Flm k 2Im FpX ) rm k 1(X ) 2m 2k 2 2m 2k 1 1 C C A ; = ~W0(X ) k Y l= 1 Wl(X ) k(X ) N X p= 1 HIm qpr~m k 1;p(X ) rm k 1(X ) 2m 2k 2 2m 2k 1 2rm k 1(X ) 1 2m 2k 1 !

can be estim ated as

(27)

for all X 2 R2n. B y possibly increasing su ciently the value of the constant k

w hich is ofcourse possible w hile keeping (3.54),one can also controlthis term w ith the \good" term (3.48).

For 1 l k and 1 p N ,w e shallnow study the term

B5;k;p;l(X )= ~W0(X ) HIm qpWl (X ) k Y j= 1 j6=l Wj(X ) k(X ) ~ rm k 1;p(X ) rm k 1(X ) 2m 2k 2 2m 2k 1 ;

appearing in the term B5;k;p in (3.41). B y noticing that

rm l 2(X ) l1rm l 1(X )

2m 2l 3 2m 2l 1;

on the support ofthe function HIm qpWl+ 1,it follow s from (3.1),(3.3),(3.30),(3.31), (3.32),(3.34),(3.50),Lem m a 4.2.8 and Lem m a 4.2.13 that for allX 2 R2n,

kak;0;:::;k 1 N X p= 1 jB5;k;p;1(X )j. 1 2 k W~0(X ) 0(X )rm 1(X ) 1 2m 1 and kak;0;:::;k 1 N X p= 1 jB5;k;p;l(X )j. 1 2 k W~0(X ) l 1 Y j= 1 Wj(X ) l 1(X )rm l(X ) 1 2m 2l+ 1; w hen l 2. B y possibly increasing again the value of the constant k, one can

therefore controlthe term

kak;0;:::;k 1

N

X

p= 1

B5;k;p;

w ith the \good" term (3.48). T he value ofthe constant k is now de nitively xed.

A bout the term s B2;k;p,w e deduce from (3.1),(3.30),(3.34),(3.41),Lem m a 4.2.8

and Lem m a 4.2.11 that for allX 2 R2n,

(3.55) kak;0;:::;k 1 N X p= 1 jB2;k;p(X )j. ~W0(X ) k+ 1Y l= 1 Wl(X ) rm k 1(X ) 1 2m 2k 1: B y distinguishing tw o cases,w e rst assum e in the follow ing that k m 3. In this case,by using (3.34) and (3.36) w ith j = k + 1,w e obtain that for allX 2 R2n,

kak;0;:::;k 1 N X p= 1 jB2;k;p(X )j c0m 1; 0;:::;m 2;1;:::;k ~ W0(X ) mY 1 l= 1 Wl(X ) N X p= 1 R e qp(X ) + mX 2 j= k+ 1 c0j; 0;:::;j 1; 1;:::;k ~ W0(X ) j Y l= 1 Wl(X ) j(X )rm j 1(X ) 1 2m 2j 1; w hich im plies that

(28)

w here the quantities c0j;

0;:::;j 1;1;:::;k stand for positive constants w hose values only depend on 0,..., j 1, 1,..., k,but not on ( l)j l m 2 and ( l)k+ 1 l m 2.

Indeed,w e recallthatthe constantsappearing in the estim ates(3.34)only depend on the values ofthe param eters 0,..., j 1;but not on ( l)j l m 2 and ( l)1 l m 2.

O ne can therefore choose the constant k+ 1 1 in (3.44)su ciently large in orderto

absorb the term ofindex j = k + 1 in the sum (3.53);and the term ofindex j = k + 1 in the sum appearing in the right hand side of the estim ate (3.56), by the term of sam e index in the \good" term (3.48).

W hen k = m 2 and taking m 2= 1,itfollow sfrom (3.34),used w ith j = m 1,

and (3.55) that for allX 2 R2n,

m 2am 2; 0;:::;m 3 N X p= 1 jB2;m 2;p(X )j. ~W0(X ) mY 1 l= 1 Wl(X ) r1(X ) 1 3 (3.57) . N X p= 1 R e qp(X ):

T his process allow s us to achieve the construction of the w eight functions pp, 1

p N ,satisfying (3.46),w hich ends the proofof(3.46). T his also ends the proofof P roposition 2.0.1.

4. A ppendix

4.1. W ick calculus. T he purpose ofthis section is to recallthe de nition and basic properties ofthe W ick quantization that w e need for the proofofT heorem 1.2.1. W e follow here the presentation ofthe W ick quantization given by N .Lerner in [7]and refer the reader to his w ork for the proofs ofthe results recalled below .

T he m ain property ofthe W ick quantization is its property ofpositivity,i.e.,that non-negative H am iltonians de ne non-negative operators

a 0 ) aW ick 0:

W e recall that this is not the case for the W eyl quantization and refer to [7] for an explicit exam ple of non-negative H am iltonian de ning an operator w hich is not non-negative.

B eforede ning properly the W ick quantization,w e rstneed to recallthe de nition ofthe w ave packets transform ofa function u 2 S(Rn),

W u(y; )= (u;’y;)L2(Rn)= 2n =4 Z

Rn

u(x)e (x y)2e 2i (x y):dx; (y; )2 R2n: w here

’y;(x)= 2n =4e (x y)

2

e2i (x y):; x 2 Rn; and x2= x2

1+ :::+ x2n. W ith this de nition,one can check (see Lem m a 2.1 in [7])that

the m apping u 7! W u is continuous from S(Rn) to S(R2n),isom etric from L2(Rn) to

L2(R2n) and that w e have the reconstruction form ula

(4.1) 8u 2 S(Rn);8x 2 Rn; u(x)=

Z

R2n

W u(y; )’y;(x)dyd :

B y denoting Y the operator de ned in the W eylquantization by the sym bol

pY(X )= 2ne 2 jX Y j

2

; Y = (y; )2 R2n; w hich is a rank-one orthogonalprojection

(29)

w e de ne the W ick quantization ofany L1 (R2n) sym bola as

(4.2) aW ick= Z

R2n

a(Y ) YdY :

M ore generally,one can extend this de nition w hen the sym bola belongs to S0(R2n)

by de ning the operator aW ickfor any u and v in S(Rn) by

< aW icku;v >S0(Rn);S (Rn)= < a(Y );( Yu;v)L2(Rn)>S0(R2n);S (R2n);

w here < ; S>0(Rn);S (Rn)denotes the duality bracket betw een the spaces S0(Rn) and S(Rn). T he W ick quantization is a positive quantization

(4.3) a 0 ) aW ick 0:

In particular,realH am iltonians get quantized in this quantization by form ally self-adjointoperatorsand onehas(see P roposition 3.2 in [7])thatL1 (R2n)sym bolsde ne

bounded operators on L2(Rn) such that

(4.4) kaW ickkL (L2(Rn)) kakL1 (R2n):

A ccording to P roposition 3.3 in [7],the W ick and W eylquantizations ofa sym bola are linked by the follow ing identities

(4.5) aW ick= ~aw; w ith (4.6) ~a(X )= Z R2n a(X + Y )e 2 jY j22ndY ; X 2 R2n; and (4.7) aW ick= aw + r(a)w; w here r(a) stands for the sym bol

(4.8) r(a)(X ) = Z 1 0 Z R2n (1 )a00(X + Y )Y2e 2 jY j22ndY d ; X 2 R2n;

ifw e use here the norm alization chosen in [7]for the W eylquantization (4.9) (awu)(x)=

Z

R2n

e2i (x y):a x + y

2 ; u(y)dyd ;

w hich di ers from the one chosen in this paper. B ecause of this di erence in nor-m alizations, certain constant factors w ill naturally appear in the core of the proof of T heorem 1.2.1 w hile using certain form ulas of Section 4.1, but these are m inor adaptations. W e also recallthe follow ing com position form ula obtained in the proof ofP roposition 3.4 in [7], (4.10) aW ickbW ick= h ab 1 4 a 0 b 0 + 1 4i fa;bg iW ick + S;

w ith kSkL (L2(Rn)) dnkakL1 2(b); w hen a 2 L1 (R2n) and b is a sm ooth sym bol satisfying

2(b)= sup

X 2 R2n ; T 2 R2n ;jT j= 1

jb(2)(X )T2j< + 1 :

T he term dn appearing in the previous estim ate stands for a positive constant

(30)

4.2. Som e technical lem m as. T his second part ofthe appendix is devoted to the proofs ofseveraltechnicallem m as.

L em m a 4.2.1. For any 1 j N , 1 p N , (l1;:::;lk) 2 f1;:::;N gk and

s1;s22 N ,we have HIm qp R e qj Im Fl1:::Im Flk(Im Fp) s1X ;Im F l1:::Im Flk(Im Fp) s2X (4.11) = 2R e qj Im Fl1:::Im Flk(Im Fp) s1+ 1X ;Im F l1:::Im Flk(Im Fp) s2X + 2R e qj Im Fl1:::Im Flk(Im Fp) s1X ;Im F l1:::Im Flk(Im Fp) s2+ 1X ; where R e qj(X ;Y ) stands for the polarized form associated to the quadratic form

R e qj.

Proof of Lem m a 4.2.1. W e begin by noticing from (1.10) and the skew -sym m etry property ofH am ilton m aps (1.11) that the H am ilton m ap ofthe quadratic form

~ r(X )= R e qj Im Fl1:::Im Flk(Im Fp) s1X ;Im F l1:::Im Flk(Im Fp) s2X ; is given by (4.12) F =~ 1 2( 1) k+ s1(Im F

p)s1Im Flk:::Im Fl1R e FjIm Fl1:::Im Flk(Im Fp)

s2

+ 1 2( 1)

k+ s2(Im F

p)s2Im Flk:::Im Fl1R e FjIm Fl1:::Im Flk(Im Fp)

s1; since

( 1)k+ s1 X ;(Im F

p)s1Im Flk:::Im Fl1R e FjIm Fl1:::Im Flk(Im Fp)

s2X (4.13) = Im Fl1:::Im Flk(Im Fp) s1X ;R e F jIm Fl1:::Im Flk(Im Fp) s2X = R e qj Im Fl1:::Im Flk(Im Fp) s1X ;Im F l1:::Im Flk(Im Fp) s2X = R e qj Im Fl1:::Im Flk(Im Fp) s2X ;Im F l1:::Im Flk(Im Fp) s1X = Im Fl1:::Im Flk(Im Fp) s2X ;R e F jIm Fl1:::Im Flk(Im Fp) s1X = ( 1)k+ s2 X ;(Im F

p)s2Im Flk:::Im Fl1R e FjIm Fl1:::Im Flk(Im Fp)

s1X : T hen,a direct com putation (see Lem m a 2 in [16]) show s that the H am ilton m ap of the quadratic form

HIm qp~r = Im qp;~r = @Im qp @ : @~r @x @Im qp @x : @~r @ ; is given by the com m utator 2[Im Fp;~F ],that is,

HIm qp~r(X )= 2 X ;[Im Fp;~F ]X : A com putation as in (4.13) then allow s to directly get (4.11).

L em m a 4.2.2. C onsider a C1 (R ) function f such that

f 2 L1 (R ) and 9c1;c2> 0; supp f0 x 2 R :c1 jxj c2 ;

(31)

ProofofLem m a 4.2.2. It is su cient to check that

(4.15) r r(X )hX i 2 2 S hX i ;hX i 2 dX2 ;

w here is a sm all open neighborhood of supp f0r(X )hX i 2 : W e deduce from

(2.16) and the fact that r(X ) is a non-negative quadratic form that r(X ) hX i2

and

jr r(X ) j. r(X )1=2. hX i ;

on . B y noticing that 0 < 1,hX ir 2 S(hX ir;hX i 2dX2),for any r 2 R ;and

that the function r(X ) is just a quadratic form ,w e directly deduce (4.15) from the previous estim ates and the Leibniz’s rule,since

r(X )2 S hX i2 ;hX i 2 dX2 :

In allthe follow ing lem m as,w e shalldenote by rk the quadratic form s de ned in

(3.6) for 0 k m .

L em m a 4.2.3. For alls 2 R and 0 j m 2,we have

rm j 1(X )s2 S rm j 1(X )s;rm j 1(X ) 1dX2 ;

if is any open set where

rm j 1(X )& hX i

2 (2m 2j 1 ) 2m + 1 :

Proof of Lem m a 4.2.3. R ecalling from (3.6) that the sym bol rm j 1(X ) is a

non-negative quadratic form and that w e have from (2.16) that (4.16) jr rm j 1(X )j. rm j 1(X )

1 2; w hich im plies that for alls 2 R ,

r rm j 1(X )s rm j 1(X )s . r rm j 1(X ) rm j 1(X ) (4.17) . rm j 1(X ) 1 2;

on ,w e notice that the result ofLem m a 4.2.3 is therefore a straightforw ard conse-quence ofthe Leibniz’s rule.

L em m a 4.2.4. C onsider the function jde ned in (3.30)then for any 0 j m 2, j2 S 1;rm j 1(X )

2m 2j 3 2m 2j 1dX2 ; if is any open set where

rm j 1(X )& hX i

2 (2m 2j 1 ) 2m + 1 ; which im plies in particular that

j2 S 1;hX i

(32)

ProofofLem m a 4.2.4. W e rst notice from (3.1) and (3.30) that rm j 2(X ) rm j 1(X ) 2m 2j 3 2m 2j 1; on \ supp 0 j. Since from (2.16), jr rm j 2(X )j. rm j 2(X ) 1 2 (4.18) . rm j 1(X ) 2m 2j 3 2 (2m 2j 1 );

on \ supp 0j,w e deduce thatthe quadratic sym bolrm j 2(X )belongsto the class

(4.19) S \ supp 0 j rm j 1(X ) 2m 2j 3 2m 2j 1; dX 2 rm j 1(X ) 2m 2j 3 2m 2j 1 :

It follow s from Lem m a 4.2.3 that rm j 2(X ) rm j 1(X ) 2m 2j 3 2m 2j 1 2 S \ supp 0 j 1; dX2 rm j 1(X ) 2m 2j 3 2m 2j 1 ;

w hich im plies that

j2 S 1;rm j 1(X )

2m 2j 3 2m 2j 1dX2 : T his ends the proofofLem m a 4.2.4.

L em m a 4.2.5. C onsider the function Wj de ned in (3.31) then for any 1 j

m 1,

Wj2 S 1;rm j 1(X ) 1dX2 ;

if is any open set where

rm j 1(X )& hX i

2 (2m 2j 1 ) 2m + 1 ; which im plies in particular that

Wj2 S 1;hX i

2 (2m 2j 1 ) 2m + 1 dX2 :

ProofofLem m a 4.2.5. B y noticing from (3.3) and (3.31) that rm j 1(X ) rm j(X ) 2m 2j 1 2m 2j+ 1 and rm j(X )& hX i 2 (2m 2j+ 1) 2m + 1 ; on \ supp W 0

j,and that the tw o derivatives

0and w0

2 ofthe functions appearing

in (3.30) and (3.31) have sim ilar types ofsupport as the function de ned in (3.2),w e notice that w e are exactly in the setting studied in Lem m a 4.2.4 w ith j replaced by j 1. W e therefore deduce the result of Lem m a 4.2.5 from our analysis led in the proofofLem m a 4.2.4.

L em m a 4.2.6. Ifs1,s22 N ,1 j;p N ,(l1;:::;lk)2 f1;:::;N gk then we have

R e qj(Im Fl1:::Im Flk(Im Fp)

s1X ;Im F

l1:::Im Flk(Im Fp)

s2X ) R e qj(Im Fl1:::Im Flk(Im Fp)

s1X )12R e q

j(Im Fl1:::Im Flk(Im Fp)

(33)

and

r R e qj(Im Fl1:::Im Flk(Im Fp)

s1X ;Im F l1:::Im Flk(Im Fp) s2X ) . R e qj(Im Fl 1:::Im Flk(Im Fp) s1X )12 + R e qj(Im Fl 1:::Im Flk(Im Fp) s2X )12 . rk+ m ax(s 1;s2)(X ) 1 2:

Proof of Lem m a 4.2.6. B y reason ofsym m etry,w e can assum e in the follow ing that s1 s2. R ecalling that the quadratic form R e qjis non-negative,the rst estim ate is

a direct consequence of(3.6) and the C auchy-Schw arz inequality. A bout the second estim ate,w e recallfrom (4.12) that the H am ilton m ap ofthe quadratic form

R e qj(Im Fl1:::Im Flk(Im Fp)

s1X ;Im F l1:::Im Flk(Im Fp) s2X ); is 1 2( 1) k+ s1(Im F

p)s1Im Flk:::Im Fl1R e FjIm Fl1:::Im Flk(Im Fp)

s2

+ 1 2( 1)

k+ s2(Im F

p)s2Im Flk:::Im Fl1R e FjIm Fl1:::Im Flk(Im Fp)

s1: A direct com putation as in (3.18) of[16]show s that

r R e qj(Im Fl1:::Im Flk(Im Fp)

s1X ;Im F

l1:::Im Flk(Im Fp)

s2X ) (4.20)

= ( 1)k+ s1+ 1 (Im F

p)s1Im Flk:::Im Fl1R e FjIm Fl1:::Im Flk(Im Fp)

s2

+ ( 1)k+ s2+ 1 (Im F

p)s2Im Flk:::Im Fl1R e FjIm Fl1:::Im Flk(Im Fp)

s1

w here

= 0 In In 0

:

T he notation In stands here for the n by n identity m atrix. W e deduce from (2.16)

and (4.20) that for any s 2 N ,

j(Im Fp)sIm Flk:::Im Fl1R e FjIm Fl1:::Im Flk(Im Fp)

s X j (4.21) . r R e qj(Im Fl 1:::Im Flk(Im Fp) sX ) . R e qj(Im Fl 1:::Im Flk(Im Fp) s X )21:

B y using tw ice the estim ate (4.21) w ith respectively X and (Im Fp)s2 s1X ,and the

index s = s1,w e deduce from (3.6)and (4.20)the second estim ate in Lem m a 4.2.6.

L em m a 4.2.7. C onsider the quadratic form ~rm j 1;pde ned in (3.4) and (3.5) then

for any 0 j m 2 and 1 p N , ~ rm j 1;p(X ) rm j 1(X ) 2m 2j 2 2m 2j 1 2 S 1;rm j 1(X ) 2m 2j 3 2m 2j 1dX2 ; if is any open set where

rm j 1(X )& hX i 2 (2m 2j 1 ) 2m + 1 and rm j 2(X ). rm j 1(X ) 2m 2j 3 2m 2j 1; which im plies in particular that

(34)

ProofofLem m a 4.2.7. Since from Lem m a 4.2.6, j~rm j 1;p(X )j. rm j 1(X ) 2m 2j 2 2m 2j 1 and jr ~rm j 1;p(X )j. rm j 1(X ) 1 2 + r m j 2(X ) 1 2 . rm j 1(X ) 1 2;

on ,w e get that the quadratic form ~rm j 1;pbelongs to the sym bolclass

S rm j 1(X ) 2m 2j 2 2m 2j 1;r m j 1(X ) 2m 2j 3 2m 2j 1dX2 : O ne can then deduce the result ofLem m a 4.2.7 from Lem m a 4.2.3.

W hen adding a large param eter j 1 in the description of the open set , a

straightforw ard adaptation of the proof of the previous lem m a gives the follow ing L1 ( ) estim ate w ith respect to this param eter.

L em m a 4.2.8. C onsider the quadratic form ~rm j 1;pde ned in (3.4) and (3.5) then

for any 0 j m 2 and 1 p N , rm j 1(X ) 2m 2j 2 2m 2j 1r~ m j 1;p(X ) L1 ( ). 1 2 j ;

if is any open set where

rm j 1(X )& hX i 2 (2m 2j 1 ) 2m + 1 and rm j 2(X ). j1rm j 1(X ) 2m 2j 3 2m 2j 1; with j 1.

In the follow ing lem m as,w e shallcarefully study the dependence ofthe estim ates w ith respect to the large param eter j 1.

L em m a 4.2.9. For any 0 j m 2,we have for allX 2 ,

N X p= 1 HIm qpr~m j 1;p(X ) rm j 1(X ) 2m 2j 2 2m 2j 1 2rm j 1(X ) 1 2m 2j 1 . 1 2 j rm j 1(X ) 1 2m 2j 1;

if is any open set where

Références

Documents relatifs

[r]

NACINOVICH, Complex analysis and complexes of differential operators, Summer Seminar on Complex Analysis, Trieste, 1980, to appear in. Springer Lecture

Since T* is the complexifieation of the real cotangent bundle, we can identify the sub-bundle consisting of real cotangent vectors. Therefore the generalized

[r]

Since we are assuming that &lt;I&gt; is nondegenerate, i.e. Let Sj be a sector which contains Lj.. In order to obtain a sharp version of Theorem 6, we will need decay estimates for

The main purpose of this paper is to construct a toy class of Feller semigroups, hence, Feller processes, with state space R n × Z m using pseudo- dierential operators not

The fractional embedding procedure allows us to define a natural fractional analogue of the Euler-Lagrange equation. This result is satisfying because the procedure is fixed. How-

More recently AGMON [1] proved very precise weighted estimates in L 2 (R&#34;) for second order elliptic partial differential operators for the case when z = 0 does not belong