R ENDICONTI
del
S EMINARIO M ATEMATICO
della
U NIVERSITÀ DI P ADOVA
M AURO N ACINOVICH
On weighted estimated for some systems of partial differential operators
Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, tome 69 (1983), p. 221-232
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=RSMUP_1983__69__221_0>
© Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, 1983, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova » (http://rendiconti.math.unipd.it/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions).
Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
Weighted Systems
of Partial Differential Operators.
MAURO NACINOVICH
(*)
Introduction.
Let Q be an open set in R" and let
A(x, D) :
- Eq(Q) be alinear
partial
differentialoperator
with smooth coefficients in S~.We want to solve the
equation
when the
right
hand sidef
Cgq(S2)
satisfies suitableintegrability
con-ditions,
y that we assume to be of the formfor a differential
operator
This
problem generalizes
that of theintegrability
of closed ex-terior differential forms on a differentiable manifold or of closed anti-
holomorphic
forms on acomplex
manifold.This last
problem
inparticular (Dolbeault complex)
y related tothe solution of E. E. Levi
problem,
motivated many researches on(*)
Indirizzo dell’A.: Universita di Pisa, Istituto di Matematica «L. To- nelli », viaBuonarroti,
2 - 56100 Pisa.overdetermined
systems.
In 1952 Garabedian andSpencer [6]
in-troduced the
i-Neumann problem,
anon-elliptic boundary
valueproblem
thatby
aregularity
theorem of Kohn andNirenberg [10]
yielded solvability
of(1), (2) for i
instrictly pseudoconvex
domains.This kind of
approach
waspursued
in fullgenerality,
in the contextof the
theory
ofpseudodifferential operators, by
H6rmander in[9].
In this paper I want to outline the extension to
general complexes
of an alternative
method,
alsodeveloped
for thestudy
ofa,
but notimplying solving
thea-Neumann problem.
It consists in the use ofa
priori
estimatesinvolving weight functions,
that are related to amethod
developed by
Carleman[5]
to proveuniqueness
for solutions of theCauchy problem.
The idea ofusing
this method was sug-gested
to Andreotti andVesentini[3], [4] by
the observation thatproblem (1), (2)
iseasily
dealt with in the case ofcompact
manifoldswithout
boundary
and then a next reasonablestep
was toinvestigate
manifolds endowed with a
complete
metric(the weight
functionplayed
an essential role for the
completeness
of themetric).
For the use ofweight
functions forj,
cf. also Hörmander[7]
and[8].
While the two methods are
giving equivalent
results forJ,
it turnsout that the
first, having stronger implications (regularity
up to theboundary) requires
apriori
estimates more difficult toestablish,
whileit cannot be
applied directly
on domains either unbounded or withnon smooth boundaries.
1. Sobolev spaces with
weights
andregularity
theorems.a. Let S~ be an open set in Rn and
let y :
Q - R be a COO-function.We set
If m is a
nonnegative integer,
we denoteby
the space of functions u in(=
space of functions that arelocally
square summable with all weak derivatives up to orderm)
for which is finite the norm:This is the norm associated to the scalar
product
that
gives
toWm(SQ, w)
a structure of Hilbert space.We also set I with the Fréchet
topology
of inverse limit of a sequence of Hilbert spaces.
We will restrict our consideration to (y-smooth open subsets of
~n,
i.e. such that there exists a C°° function
y : Q -
R with theproperties:
(3)
VceR the setQc
=o}
isrelatively compact
inS~;
(4)
the set =o}
is acompact
subset ofS2;
and to the class of
weight functions y
thatsatisfy (3), (4)
andmoreover
(5)
Vinteger
m>0 and real E > 0 we can find a constante(m, ê)
such that
The
following
lemma is fundamental for the use ofweight
functions : LEMMA. 1. Assume that Q is a-smooth and let q ECOO(Q, R) satisfy (3)
and
(4).
T hen
for
every upper semicontinuousf unction
~, : S~ -~ ~ we canfind
a COO
f unction
h : R - R such thatLet m be either a
nonnegative integer
or+
00. From theprevious
lemma ~e obtain the
following :
°
PROPOSITION 1.
If
Q is a-smooth and (p ECOO(Q, Rt) satisfies (3)
and
(4),
thenfor
any in~ ~(S~)
zue canf ind
h EOOO(R, R)
such
that 1p
= E’P(Q)
andf n
E1p),
’Bin.If
moreoverf n
- g in~ ~(S~),
then we can choose h in such a zvay thatf n
--~ g inWm(Q,1p).
This
proposition implies
inparticular
thatWl’o,(S2)
is the direct limit of the spacesWm(Q,1p) for 1p
inHaving fixed y
inVJ(S2),
we will also consider for nonnegative integers m
and real6,
the spacesWm~a(S~, y~)
=+ 6
Iny~~~.
By
lineari terpolation
we consider also the spacesy)
for s real :>0. ’After
identifying
the dual ofWO(Q,1p)
with itselfby
Riesz
isomorphism,
we define the space for s 0 as the dual ofW~8>~~(Q, y) ;
as the Rieszisomorphism yields
natural in-clusions
1p) ~ ~’(S~),
weidentify
all these spaces to spaces of distributions. We denoteby
a continuous norm in
1jJ),
7(s, ~
ER).
The spaces we have introduced have the
following properties:
PROPOSITION 2. For every
s, 6
E Rand y~ EP(Q),
the spaceof
coofunctions
withcompact support
in Q is dense inI f
s,s’, ð,
6’c- Rands ~ s’, ~
ð’-E-
s’ - s, then we have a continuous inclusionI f
s s’~’ -+- s’- s,
then the inclusion iscompact.
Let
P(x, D) = .1 aa(x)Da
be a linear differentialoperator
of order 1n.|a|m
We say that
P(x, D)
hastype (m, ð)
withrespect to 1p
E iffor every multiindex
f3
and real s > 0 we can find a constantE)
> 0 such thatWe denote
by P*(x, D)
the formaladjoint
ofP(x, D)
for the scalarproduct
of characterizedby:
If
D)
is another differentialoperator
with smooth coefficientson D,
we denoteby [P, Q]
=PoQ - Q oP
the commutator of P andQ.
Then we have:
PROPOSITION 3.
a) If P(x, D)
isof type (m, ð)
withrespect to 1p
Ethen
for
every s, a E R itdefines
a continuous linear mapb)
Theoperator P*(x, D)
is alsoof type (1n, ~).
c) If Q(x, D)
isof type (k, a),
then the commutator[P, Q]
isof type ( m -]- k -1, ~, ) for
every~, > ~ -~- cr.
If s =
(81’
... ,8j»
and 6E R,
we will write for1p)
~C ... X We will also use the notationsfor the scalar
product
on1p)
ifand for
each j
=1, ... ,
p, we denotedby (.,. -),,,,P,6
a continuous scalarproduct
in1p);
we set alsoFor and we set also and
s -+- t =
-
(81 --f- t,
... , 7 Sv+ t).
An
operator A(x, D) -
is said to be oftype ( m, k, 6)
for ap-uple
ofintegers
m =( m1,
... ,mv),
aq- aple
ofintegers
k =(k1,
... ,ka)
and a real 6 withrespect
if forevery
pair
ofindices i, j
theoperator D)
is oftype (m, - ki, 6).
Such an
operator
defines a linear and continuous mapfor all
real t,
or.b. Let m =
(m1,
...,mj))
be ap-uple
ofnonnegative integers
andlet 1p E A differential
operator
with smooth coefficientwill be said to be
y)-elliptic
if it is oftype (m, 0; 0)
and thereis a constant c > 0 such that
We have the
following:
PROPOSITION 4.
I f E(x, D)
isWm(S2,
thenfor
every s, 6 E ~is an
isomorphism.
As an
example
of such anoperator L(x, D),
we can consider theoperator
characterizedby
theidentity:
Let now 0
C ~ c 1
be fixed. We say thatE(x, D) : 6?(Q) - 6N(Q)
is if
E(x, D)
is oftype (m, 0; 0)
and there areconstants c > 0 and
I> 0
such thatNote
that,
whileWm(S2, 1p)-ellipticity implies
thatE*(x, D) o E(x, D)
isin SZ an
elliptic operator
in the sense ofDouglis
andNirenberg (cf. [12]),
neither
ellipticity
norsub-ellipticity
areimplied by
civeness. Thus we shall need also the
following assumption:
(7) E(x, D)
issub-elliptic,
i.e. there is a real number a, with 01,
such that every distribution
for
whichE(x, D) u E
E
belongs
to(For
a =1/2
necessary and sufficient conditions forsubellipticity
have been studied
by
H6rmander in[9]).
We have the
f ollowing :
PROPOSITION 5
(Regularity Theorem).
Let us assume that(6)
and(7)
hold.
T hen, if f
E with 8>0 and s-~- 6 > 0
andu E
1p)
withE(x, D) u
E1p)
solveswe have
This is the
key
result for theapplication
of estimatesinvolving
weight functions,
andplays
here a roleanalogous
of theregularization
method of Kohn and
Nirenberg
for thei-Neumann problem.
Theproof
is doneby elliptic regularization.
2.
Application
tocomplexes
ofpartial
differentialoperators.
Let us consider a
complex
of differential
operators
with smooth coefficients on Q(B(x, D) o oA(x, D) = 0) .
We assume that for 8 E
~p,
m E E Zrand V
EP(Q)
theoperator A(x, D)
is oftype (s,
m;0)
and theoperator B(x, D)
is oftype (m, t; 0).
Let us choose
2 - inf mi
and anoperator F(x, D) : 6~(Q) - wm-À(Q, y)-elliptic.
Then we choose aninteger
l in such a way that’+8
and I+
2a - t have allcomponents >
0 and we define~(~?y D) by
for every u, v E
~q( S~ ) .
Then
E~(x, D)
is oftype (m + l, 0; 0)
withrespect
to 1p.We have the
following:
PROPOSITION 6. The
properties of D) of being
eithersubelliptic
or
for
some 06 I
areindependent of
thechoice
of A,
land F.From the
regularity
theorem(Proposition 5 )
we obtain :PROPOSITION 7. Assume that the
operator E1p defined
abovesatis f ies (6)
and
(7). If ~1 > - ~
andf
EW-m+’’~al(S~, y~) satisfies B(x, D) f = 0,
then
for
any solution u E withE,~(x,
E~) of
2ve have
Moreover,
Let us denote
by A(x, D) : ~) ...
-1p)
theclosed
densely
defined linearoperator
obtainedby considering
thedifferential
operator A(xl D)
on the domainand
analogously
for.B(a", D), A*(X, D)
and-B~(.r, D).
Then we setH(h,
T;D, y)
=Then from the
regularity
theorem we obtain thefollowing:
PROPOSITION 8. Under the sacme
assumptions o f Proposition
7:If
A(x, D)
andB(x, D)
are differentialoperators
with coefficient bounded with all derivatives inSZ,
then alloperators E,,(x, D)
ob-tained as
explained
above from differentweight functions V
EP(Q)
are of
type ( m + 12 0 ; 0 ) .
Then we obtain thefollowing:
PROPOSITION 9. Assume that
for
every upper semicontinuousfunction
99: ,SZ -~ ll~ there is 1jJ E
P(Q)
such that and theoperator D) satisfies (6)
and(7),
then the spaceis
f inite
dimensional.3.
Localization
of the estimates.Let us consider now a
stronger
coerciveness estimate:namely
weassume that for the
operator E(x, D) : 6P(Q)
-6N(Q)
oftype (m, 0; 0)
we have
For
we set
Then the
following
theorem holds :PROPOSITION 10. A necessary and
sufficient
condition in order that estimate(10 ) holds,
is that there exist a constant C > 0 such thatThe
proof
of this statement is similar to that of theanalogous
statement in
Hörmander [9].
We also note
that,
if SZ isrelatively compact
andE(x, D)
is sub-elliptic
with a =1/2
on aneighborhood
of the closure ofQ,
then(10)
is a consequence of
(6)
with 6 =1/2,
while(6)
cannot beeasily
localized.
4. An
application
to the case ofcomplexes
differentialoperators
withconstant coefficient.
Let T denote the
ring
ofpolynomials
in n indeterminates~1, ... , ~n,
filtered
by
thedegree.
Given a T-module M of finitetype,
we choosea filtration
compatible
with that of J and we denoteby
M° the associatedgraded ring:
To any Hilbert resolution of
by homogeneous
matrices ofpolynomials
corresponds
a resolution of Mwhere,
for a suitable choice ofmultigraduations,
theAils
can be con-sidered as the
homogeneous parts
ofhigher degree
of theA;’s. (Cf. [2]).
The modules
Ext"(M, 6(Q)) (where 6(Q)
is considered as a left- P-moduleby p(E).f = p(D)f)
areisomorphic
to thecohomology
groups of the
complex
of differentialoperators
with constant coefficients:For E0
E we denoteby LE0
the localizationat $°
ofS,
i.e. thering
of fractions
p/q
for p, q E J andq(~°) ~
0.We say that is
simple
ofprincipal type
if the characteristicvariety TT (ll°)
= =1=0} (where m~
is the ideal ofpolynomials vanishing
at~)
is smooth outside 0 andV$° G {O 1,
having
chosen pi, ... , p, such that is definedby
pi = ... = pk = 0near
~o,
with 0 at~0,
we havewhere
( p1,
... ,Pk)
is the ideal ofLço generated by
p,,, ... , pk .The
following proposition,
that is a consequence of the results of thepreceding sections,
is ageneralization
of thevanishing
theoremsfor d
onstrictly pseudoconvex
domains of Cn for .M°simple
ofprin- cipal type:
PROPOSITION 11. Let us assume that
V(MO)
r1 Rn c and let Qbe a a-smooth open set
of
Rn with a Coofunction
92: Q - Rsatisfying (3)
and
(4)
and thefollowing convexity assumption :
There is a
compact
set K c Q such thatthe
quadratic f orm
restricted to the
complex
linear space Hof
vectorswhere
p E J
vanishes onV(MO)
andhas either at
least j negative
or at leastdime .H - j -‘-1 positive eigen-
values. Then Exti
(M, ~(S~))
isf inite
dimensional over C.If
moreover K is contained in a convex open subsetof Q,
5.
Concluding
remarks.The results of the
preceding paragraphs apply
also tocomplexes
of linear
partial
differentialoperators
with variablecoefficients;
forinstance we can
study
theCauchy-Riemann complex
induced on ageneric
real submanifold of Cn. However we will not discuss theseapplications
here. Wehope
also todevelop by
means of the result of§
4 a « functiontheory »
for somecomplexes
ofp.d.e.
with con-stant coefficients that could be of
help
in thestudy
ofanalytic hypo- ellipticity
andpropagation
ofanalytic singularities (cf. Schapira[14]).
We also want to note that the results of sections
1, 2,
3 can beextended to the case of linear differential
operators
between vector bundles over acomplete,
a-smooth Riemannianmanifold,
endowedwith affine connections.
(cf. [2]).
REFERENCES
[1] A. ANDREOTTI - M. NACINOVICH,
Complexes of partial differential
oper- ators, Ann. Scuola Norm.Sup.
Pisa, (4), 3 (1976), pp. 553-621.[2] A. ANDREOTTI - M. NACINOVICH, Noncharacteristic
hypersurfaces for
com-plexes of differential
operators, Annali di Mat. Pura eAppl., (IV),
125 (1980), pp. 13-83.[3] A. ANDREOTTI - E. VESENTINI,
Sopra
un teorema di Kodaira, Ann. Scuola Norm.Sup.
Pisa, (3) 15 (1961), pp. 283-309.[4] A. ANDREOTTI - E. VESENTINI, Carleman estimates
for
theLaplace-Bel-
trami
equation
oncomplex manifolds, I.H.E.S.,
Publ.Math.,
no. 25 (1965).[5] T. CARLEMAN, Sur un
problème
d’unicité pour lessystèmes d’équations
aux dérivées
partielles
à deux variablesindépendantes,
Ark. Mat. Astr,Fys.,
26 B, no. 17 (1939), pp. 1-9.[6] P. R. GARABEDIAN - D. C. SPENCER,
Complex boundary
valueproblems.
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 73 (1952), pp. 223-242.
[7] L. HÖRMANDER, L2 estimates and existence theorems
for
the ~ operator, Acta Math., 113 (1965), pp. 89-152.[8] L. HÖRMANDER, An Introduction to
Complex Analysis
in Several Va- riables, Princeton, 1966.[9] L. HÖRMANDER,
Pseudodifferential
operators andnonelliptic boundary
value
problems,
Comm. PureAppl.
Math., 18 (1965), pp. 443-492.[11] C. B. MORREY
jr.,
Theanalytic embeddability of
abstract realanalytic manifolds,
Ann. ofMath.,
68 (1958), pp. 159-201.[11] C. B. MORREY
jr.: Multiple integrals
in the calculusof
variations, New York, 1966.[13] M. NACINOVICH,
Complex analysis
andcomplexes of differential
operators, Summer Seminar onComplex Analysis,
Trieste, 1980, to appear inSpringer
Lecture Notes.[14] P. SCHAPIRA, Conditions de
poisitivité
dans une variétésimplectique
com-plèxe. Application
à l’étude desmicrofonctions,
Ann. Scient. Ec. Norm.Sup.,
4e série, 14 (1981), pp. 121-139.Manoscritto pervenuto in redazione il 17 marzo 1982.