HAL Id: jpa-00246618
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00246618
Submitted on 1 Jan 1992
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Anisotropic resistivity and thermopower of the organic superconductor (ET)2Cu[ N(CN)2] Br
L. Buravov, N. Kushch, V. Merzhanov, M. Osherov, A. Khomenko, E.
Yagubskii
To cite this version:
L. Buravov, N. Kushch, V. Merzhanov, M. Osherov, A. Khomenko, et al.. Anisotropic resistivity
and thermopower of the organic superconductor (ET)2Cu[ N(CN)2] Br. Journal de Physique I, EDP
Sciences, 1992, 2 (7), pp.1257-1262. �10.1051/jp1:1992207�. �jpa-00246618�
Classification Physics Abstracts
74.70K 71.30
Short Communication
Anisotropic resist1vlty and thermopower of the organic superconductor (E~j)2Cu [N(CN)2] Br
L-I-
Buravov,
N-D-Kushch,
VA.Merzhanov,
M-V-Osherov,
A-G- Khomenko and E-B-Yagubskii
Institute of Chemical Physics in Chemogolovka, Russian Academy of Sciences, Chernogolovka MD, 142432 Russia
(Received
23 April 1992, accepted 12 May1992)
Abstract. We have measured the temperature dependence of the resistivity of
(ET)2Cu [N(CN)2]
Br in three crystallographic directions and the thermopower in the a and c directions.The resistivity has two maxima at 75 and 95 K. The value of the resistivity anisotropy is rather
large:
pb/Pa
is about 10~ at the ambient temperature and increases with lowering temperature below so K- The temperature derivative of resistivity exhibits a strong maximum at 50 K-Thermopower is positive for the a direction, while it is negative for the c direction. We have concluded, that
(ET)2Cu [N(CN)2]
Br undergoes insulator-metal transitionnear 50 K similarly
to
(ET)2Cu(NCS)2.
1. Introduction.
At present, the
organic compound (ET)2Cu [N(CN)2]
Brii]
has thehighest Tc(rs
12K)
at ambi- ent pressure among ET-basedorganic superconductors.
Besides itsprominent superconducting
transition temperature,
(ET)2Cu [N(CN)2]
Br retains from itspredece8sor, (ET)2Cu(NCS)2,
another distinct feature the anomalous
resistivity
behaviour [2].(ET)2Cu[N(CN)2]Br,
as well as its relativecompound (ET)2Cu[N(CN)2]
Cl [3],belongs
to the
family
of ET salts with a so-called ~-typecrystal
structure [4]. It is formedby
two- dimensionalconducting
sheets of ETmolecules,
located in the acplane
andcomposed
of ETdimers, alternating
withpolymer
anion chainsextending along
the a direction[I].
In th18 paper we describe the way of
synthesis
ofhigh quality single crystals
of(ET)2Cu [N(CN)2]
Br and the results of temperatureinvestigations
ofresistivity
andthermopower
indifserent
crystallographic
directions.1258 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE I N°7
2.
Experimental.
2, I SYNTHESIS. The
(ET)2Cu [N(CN)2]
Brcrysta18
wereprepared by
electro-chemical ox- idation on Pt electrodes of ET(2
x10~~ M)
under thegalvanostatic regime
at the constanttemperature
(20 °C).
Theelectrolyte
used was the mixture of CuBr(5
x 10~~M)
,
NaN(CN)2 (5
x10~~ M)
and 18- crown-6 ether(5
x10~~ M)
or CuBr andPh4P [N(CN)2].
The solventswere
I,1,2-trichloroethane (TCE),
TCE with an addition of10ili ofethanol,
and nitrobenzene.The
magnitude
of the current,applied
to differentcells,
was between 0.2 and 0.6PA.
The
quality
ofsingle crystals, determining
theirsuperconducting
transition temperature Tc and transition width6Tc, depends significantly
on thesynthesis
conditions: themagnitude
of the current, and the kind of the solvent and
dicyanarnide
salt used. The mostperfect crystals
wereproduced
in the pure TCE without absoluteethanol, by using NaN(CN)2,
at theelectrocrystallization
current of 0.5PA (the
anode currentdensity
of IA I-SpA/cm~).
At these conditions thecrystals
grew on the anode in 12-14day8
and werequite
uniform. Thecrystals
had theshape
ofplates
withtypical
dimensions I x I x 0.05 mm~.2.2 itESISTIVITY AND ANISOTROPY. The temperature
dependence
of the electrical resis-tivity
was measuredby
the fourprobe
method with both d-c- and a-c-techniques.
Contacts to thesample
were madeby graphite
pasteusing
10 pm diameterplatinum
wires. The values ofpb/pa
andpb/pc
werelarge enough
toperform
direct measurements of pb,assuming
the uni- form distribution of current in thesample,
whenvoltage
isapplied normally
to theconducting plane.
Theresistivity anisotropy
was measured alsousing
animproved Montgomery
method [7].At the ambient temperature the value of the
resistivity
in the acplane
varies in the range 0.02-1 Qcm for difserent batchesdepending
onsynthesis
conditions.Usually crystals
with lowerp(295 K)
hadhigher
Tc and lower 6Tc. For the bestcrystals, having perfect superconducting transition,
thetypical resistivity
values at the ambient temperature are: pa = 4 x 10~~Qcm,
pb " 50
Qcm,
pc = 6 x10~~
Qcm. Atypical
temperaturedependence
of theresistivity
of(ET)2Cu [N(CN)2]
Br in all directions is shown in thefigure
I. At first it lowersslightly
with thediminishing
of thetemperature, having
a broad minimum of around 250K,
then grow8 downapproximately
100 K. Then theresistivity
passesthrough
the two maxima at 95 K and 75K,
the formerbeing higher
than the latter. These twomaxima,
notequally pronounced
indifserent
directions,
are wellreproduced
in difserentsamples.
Afterthis,
theresistivity drops
about 50 times until the
beginning
of thesuperconducting
transition. The insert offigure
I shows theregion
of thesuperconducting
transition. It occur8 at 2~ = ii.7 K(the midpoint
of the
transition)
with awidth,
determined as 6Tc = To.9 Toi
being
less than 0A K. The temperature derivative of pa, pb and pc exhibits astrong
maximum at 50 K(Fig. 2).
The overall behaviour of theresistivity
in all directions isqualitatively
similar.Temperature dependences
of calculatedresistivity anisotropy pb/pa
andpb/pc
for the Samecrystal
are shown infigure
3. Both values do notchange significantly
in theregion
above 50-60 K. With furtherlowering
the temperature pb decreasesslower,
than other components,so both
pb/pa
andpb/pc
increasenoticeably.
Measurements of theresistivity anisotropy by
theimproved Montgomery
method [7] gaveessentially
the same temperaturedependence,
but the values ofpb/pa
* 3000 in the range 70-295 K were moretypical.
2.3 THERMOPOWER.
Thermopower
was measuredby
standard for anorganic crystals
method [8]. The temperaturedependence
ofthermopower
measured in directions a and c on the samecrystal
is shown in thefigure
4. Thethermopower
has difserentsigns
for difserent.2
/~b
~
l-O b£
LT~
C~ 0.8 0.04
j~ p~
~ 0.6
~~~
~ 0.02
CL
~'~ 0.01
0 2 0.00
o-o
Temperature,
Fig. 1. The temperature dependence of the normalized resistivity in the a, b and c directions.
Insert shows the superconducting transition.
directions. For the a direction the
thermopower
ispositive
in the whole temperature range. It has a value of about + 20pV/K
at the ambient temperature, then increasesslightly
with thelowering
of the temperature andthen,
after a broad maximum around 130 K, decreases towardszero almost
linearly. Similarly,
for the c direction thethermopower
isnegative
with the value of -18pV/K
at the ambient temperature and has an extremum at 120 K.Remarkably,
it has a wellpronounced peak
at 70K,
followedby
a minimum at 50K,
this featurebeing reproduced
on all measured
samples.
Belowapproximately
10 K both components ofthermopower
arevery close to zero.
3. Discussion.
Superconducting transition, occuring
at Tc = ii.?K,
is inagreements
withprevious
resultsii].
Small observed 6Tc reflectshigh quality
of ourcrystals.
The value of theresistivity
at ambient temperature is somewhathigher
than it wasreported
earlierii].
It should be alsonoted,
that inspite
of verysharp superconducting
transition the residual resistance ratio in(ET)2Cu [N(CN)2]
Br isrelatively
low(p(75 K)/p(12 K)
rs50).
As it was
mentioned,
the temperature derivative of theresistivity
exhibits a strongpeak
at 50 K for all directions. As in the case of(ET)2Cu(NCS)2
[6], it can be anargument
for theexistence of a
phase
transition in(ET)2Cu [N(CN)2]
Br at this temperature. This transition should be of an anomalous insulator-metal type, since thelow-temperature
state is metallic andsuperconducting,
and thehigh-temperature
one issemiconducting.
The reasons for suchtransition,
as in the case of(ET)2Cu(NCS)2
[6], ispresumably
thechange
of the band structure1260 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE I N°7
0.08
0.06 fi..
~ O '
~ . ,
7J $
~
~g # .
, ..,
~/ ,
' :., ,
0.00 ~-~
-0.02
0
20 1K
« 4000
CL
j
CL
/~bll~a
p~/pc
Temperature,
Fig. 3. The temperature dependence of the resistivity anisotropy.
So
~ o o o o
o o
o o o o a o o oo
~~ o ° ° ~ ~
~oo ao
b£
~
~ap°/
C
©
~
il
300
F TemperotUre, K
~
q~ ,
~ .
~ :. ~
'
Sc
1262 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE I N°7
derivative of the
resistivity occuring
at 50K,
and differentsigns
of thethermopower
in thea and c directions. We have
concluded,
that(ET)2Cu [N(CN)2]
Brundergoes
an insulator to metal transition near 50 Ksimilarly
to(ET)2Cu(NCS)2.
The additionalanomaly
observed atrs 95 K may be concerned with another
phase
transition.Acknowledgements.
The work was
supported by
the Scientific Council on the U-S-S-R- StateProgram "lligh-Tc Superconductivity".
The authors wish to thank I.F.Shchegolev
and V-N- Laukhin for valuablediscussions,
and A-V-Zvarykina
forhelp
in measurements.References
[1]KINI
A-M-, GEISER U., WANG H-H-, CARLSON K-D-, WILLIAMS J-M-, KwoK W-K-, WANDERVOORT K-G-, THOMPSON I-E-, STUPKA D-L-, JUNG D., WHANGBO M.-H., inorg.Chem. 29
(1990)
2555.[2] URAYAMA H., YAMOCHI H., SAITO G., SUGANO T-, KINOSHITA M., SATO S., OSHIMA K., KAWAMOTO A., TANAKA J., Chem. Lett. 1988
(1988)
55.[3] WILLIAMS I-M-, KINI A-M-, WANG H-H-, CARLSON K-D-, GEISER U., MONTGOMERY L-K-,
PYRKA G-I-, WATKINS D-M-, KOMMERS I-M-, BORYSCHUK S-I-, CROUCH A-V-S-, KWOK W-K-, SCHIRBER I-E-, OVERMYER D-L-, JUNG D., WHANGBO M.-H., inorg. Chem. 29
(1990)
3272.[4] GEISER U-, SCHULTZ A-I-, WANG H-H-, WATKINS D-M-, STUPKA D-L-, WILLIAMS I-M-, SCHIRBER I-E-, OVERMYER D-L-, JUNG D-, NOVOA I-I-, WHANGBO M--H., Physica C 174
(1991)
475.[5] URAYAMA H., YAMOCHI H., SAITO G-, NOZAWA K., SUGANO T-, KINOSHITA M., INABE T., MORI T., MARUYAMA Y., INOKUCHI H., Chem. Lett. 1988
(1988)
1057.[6]BURAVOV L-I-, ZVARYKINA A-V-, KUSHCH N-D-, LAUKHIN V-N-, MERZHANOV V-A-, KHOMENKO A-G-, YAGUBSKII E-B-, JETP 68
(1989)
182.[7] BURAVOV L-I-, Zh. Tekh. Fiz. 59
(1989)
138.[8] CHAIKIN P., KWAK J-F-, Rev. Sci. Instrvm. 46
(1975)
218.[9] MOAT H., INOKUCHI H., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 57