C AHIERS DE
TOPOLOGIE ET GÉOMÉTRIE DIFFÉRENTIELLE CATÉGORIQUES
A LFREDO R. G RANDJEAN
M ARIA J. V ALE Almost smooth algebras
Cahiers de topologie et géométrie différentielle catégoriques, tome 32, no2 (1991), p. 131-138
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=CTGDC_1991__32_2_131_0>
© Andrée C. Ehresmann et les auteurs, 1991, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Cahiers de topologie et géométrie différentielle catégoriques » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
ALMOST SMOOTH ALGEBRAS
by
Alfredo R. GRANDJEAN and Maria J. VALECAHIERS DE TOPOLOGIE
F’T GÉOMÉTRIE DIFFÉRENTIELLE CA TÉGORIQUES
VOL. XXXII-2 (1991)
RÉSUMÉ. Le but de cet article est d’ introduire et de caractériser les
alg6bres "presque
lisses". UneA-alg6-
bre B est presque lisse si et seulement
si,
pour touthomomorphisme surjectif
deA-alg6bres
commutatives de but B la seconde suite exacte fondamentale associ6e est une suite exacte courte.INTRODUCTION.
We introduce and characterize "almost smooth
algebras",
which
generalize
theformally
smoothalgebras
of Grothendieck[1].
There are "almost smoothalgebras"
that are not for-mally
smooth.It is well known that for every
epimorphism
of groups there is a short exact sequence of modules[2]. Also,
forevery
surjective homomorphism
of commutativealgebras
thereis a
right
exact sequence(the
second fundamental exactsequence
[5]),
whose lack of exactness is measuredby
thecotangent
functors[3],
whichplay
animportant
role inalge-
braic deformation
theory.
"Almost smoothalgebras"
are char-acterized
by
the short exactness property of the second fun- damental exact sequence.DEFINITION.
An
A-algebra
B isalmost2
smooth if for anyA-algebra C ,
any ideal I of C
satisfying 1=0,
and anyA-algebra
homo-morphism
g : B ->C/I
such that I is aninjective
B-modulevia g , there exists a
lifting
f : B -> C of g that is anA-algebra homomorphism.
THEOREM. Let B be an
A-algebra.
Then thefollowing
condi-tions are
equivalent:
(1)
B is an almost smoothA-algebra;
(2)
T1(BBA,I =
0for every injective
B-maduleI ,
whereT1
is Lichtenbaum and
Schlessinger’s first
uppercotangent fun-
ctor
[3];
(3) T1 (BBA,B) = 0 ,
whereT 1
is thefirst
lower cotangentfunctor [3];
(4) for
everysurjective homomorphism of A-algebras
g : D ))
B ,
theimperfection
moduleof
theD-algebra
Brelytive
toA ,
eBBDBA([1], p.136),
isisomorphic
toJ/J ,
where J =Kerg ;
(5) for
everysurjecfive homomorphism of A-algebras
g : D ->
B ,
the secondfundamental
exact sequenceof
B-modules
is short exact, where J =
Kerg ;
(6)
there is apolynomial ring
R over A and asurjective homomorphism of A-algebras
R -> B such thatis short exact, where J =
Kerg ;
(7)
there is anisomorphism Ext1B(R DBA,M = T1(BBA,M) , for
every B-module M .
(8)
asingular
A-extensionof
Bby
aninjective
B-module Iis A-trivial
if
itsimage by
asurjective homomorphism of A-algebras
u : D ---+7 B isA-trivial;
(9) if
0 -> M -> E -> B -> 0 is asingular
A-extensionof
Bby
the B-moduleM ,
then the secondfundamental
exactsequence
of
B-modulesis short exact;
(10)
everysingular
A-extensionof B ,
of
B withMcN , EcH ,
such that thediagram
is commutative.
PROOF.
(1)
-(2). Let 0 -> + I -> + E P-> B -> + 0 be a singular
A-extension of B
by
aninjective
B-module I . Since Bis an almost smooth
A-algebra,
there is anA-algebra
sections of p . Thus 0 -> I -> E -> + B -> + 0 is
split.
(2)
==>(1).
Let C be anA-algebra
and I an ideal of C satis-fying
I2 = 0 . Let p : C ->GI
be theprojection
andg : B ->
GI
anA-algebra homomorphism
such that I is an in-jective
B-module via g . Consider the commutativediagram
where
Since
T’(BBA,I)
=0 ,
is a
split
A-extension. For the section s of q , hs isa
lifting
of g .(2)
4===t(3).
Let P be apolynomial ring
over Amapping
ontoB with kernel J . The sequence
is exact. If I is an
injective B-module,
the sequenceis also exact. Thus
if
Conversely,
letT1(BBA,I)
= 0 for everyinjective
B-moduleI . Choose I to contain
T1(BW,B) ;
it follows thatT1 (BBA,B)
= 0 .(3)
=>(4)
Consider thesurjective homomorphism
of A-algebras
D ->> B and the associated exact sequencesSince
be a free extension of B over A
[3] and
let J be the kernel of R -- B . From the exact sequencewe obtain the exact sequence
module. Since
T1(BBA,I)= EXt1B (QBBA,I) I
=0 ,
u* isinjec-
tive.
(8) =>(9).
Let 0 -> M -> E -> B -> 0 be asingular
A-extension and M -> CE’A + E B -> nBV" - 0 the second funda- mental sequence associated
with
theA-algebra homomorphism
E ->> B . Since p :
T(BBA,I)
-T (EBA,I)
isinjective
for every
injective
B-moduleI ,
the sequenceis exact for any
injective
B-module I . Thus M - QEBA OE B isinjective.
(9)
=>(3).
Let P be apolynomial ring
over Amapping
onto Band with kernel J . Consider the
diagram
If
J/J2 ->QEBA +E B-> QBBA -> 0
is the second fundamentalexact sequence associated with the
A-algebra homomorphism
E -H
B ,
thenby
thenaturality
of the Jacobi-Zariski sequence, thefollowing diagram
is commutative:Since
(2) ==* (10).
Let 0 -> M -> E -> B -> 0 be asingular
A-extension of
B ,
and choose aninjective
B-module I contain-ing
M . Consider thediagram
where E’ =
(1 9 E)/H ,
1 9 E is anA-algebra
withmultiplica-
tion
and H =
{(m,-im)| m
eM} .
Thesingular
A-extension 0 -> 1 -> E’ -> B -> 0 issplit,
because T(BBA,I)
= 0 .(10) => (2).
Let 0 -> I -> E -> B -> 0 be asingular
A-extension of B
by
aninjective
B-moduleI ,
and0-> N-> D-> B-> 0 a
split embedding.
Letj : I
-> N be inclusion and 03A8 : N - I a B-modulehomomorphism
suchthat
03C8j
=1, .
Consider the commutativediagram
where
D03C8 _ (I e D)/{(03C8n,-in) n E N) .
Since the singular
extension 0 -> I ->
D-> B-> 0 splits, so too does
0-> I -> E-> B-> 0.
NOTE.
Every formally
smoothalgebra
is almostsmooth,
butthere are almost smooth
algebras
that are notformally
and I the ideal of S
generated by
Then B is an almost smooth
A-algebra
but is notformally
smooth,
because thehomological
dimension of CB’A is infin- ite[4].
REFERENCES.
1. A.
GROTHENDIECK,
Eléments degéometrie algébrique IV,
Première
Partie,
Publ. Math.I.H.E.S.,
1964.2. P.J. HILTON & U.
STAMMBACH, A
course inhomological algebra, Springer,
1971.3. S. LICHTENBAUM & S.
SCHLESSINGER,
Thecotangent complex
of a
morphism,
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 128(1967),
41-70.
4. T.
MATSUOKA,
On almostcomplete intersections,
Manuscr.Math. 21
(1977),
329-340.5. H.
MATSUMURA,
Commutativealgebra, Benjamin,
NewYork,
1970.
6. P.
SEIBT,
Infinitesimal extensions of commutativealge- bras,
J. PureAppl. Algebra
16(1980),
197-206.Departamento
deAlgebra
Facultad de Matemiticas
Universidad de
Santiago
deCompostela
ESPAGNE