• Aucun résultat trouvé

Fracture Behavior of a Typical Adhesive Joint in a Car Body under Static Loading

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Fracture Behavior of a Typical Adhesive Joint in a Car Body under Static Loading"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:

Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.

Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at

PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

ACE-X 2009, 3rd International Conference on Advanced Computational Engineering and Experimenting [Proceedings], p. 1, 2009

READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE. https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright

NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC :

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=74c48a8c-443c-43f0-833e-b0ae1b47b7de https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=74c48a8c-443c-43f0-833e-b0ae1b47b7de

NRC Publications Archive

Archives des publications du CNRC

This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. / La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur.

Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at

Fracture Behavior of a Typical Adhesive Joint in a Car Body under Static Loading

Eskandarian, Mojtaba; D'Amours, Guillaume; Schroeder, Jessica; Spelt, Jan; Papini, Marcello

(2)

Title:

FRACTURE BEHAVIOR OF A TYPICAL ADHESIVE JOINT IN A CAR BODY UNDER STATIC LOADING

Abstract:

A post-processing work has been developed here on the basis of a pre-existing GM car structure model. First, a sub-model including the adhesive joint was extracted from the original geometry and remodeled in LS-DYNA. An elastoplastic adhesive layer was then inserted between the parts and meshed as solid elements. The adherends’ nodal displacements were then interpolated from the original result file. The implicit solver of LS-DYNA was used to determine the adhesive stress field and nodal forces produced from the new nodal displacements. The strain energy release rate in the adhesive layer was determined from the results by using a virtual crack closure technique. This was then compared with the experimentally-measured critical energy release rate obtained for the toughened heat-cured adhesive of this study. The validity of results was also verified by performing similar analysis on the standard double-cantilever-beam joint after comparing the results with available experimental data.

(3)

FRACTURE BEHAVIOR OF A TYPICAL ADHESIVE

JOINT IN A CAR BODY UNDER STATIC LOADING

M. Eskandarian1*, G. D’Amours1, and J.A. Schroeder2

1) Aluminium Technology Centre (ATC / IMI), National Research Council Canada, 501 boul. de l'Univ., Chicoutimi, Québec, Canada G7H 8C3.

2) General Motors R&D and Planning, 30500 Mound Road, Warren, MI 48090-9055. * Corresponding author: mojtaba.eskandarian@cnrc-nrc.gc.ca

The recent advancements in light-weight materials engineering progressively mo-tivated the development of adhesive joining technology in automobile industries. Al-though the adhesive bonds are of great importance for joining the body skin to the main car structure, they are modeled as no-failure elastic or elastoplastic materials in numeri-cal simulations. The difficulty mainly comes from two facts, (1) the singularity, material non-linearity and high gradient in adhesive stress field requires a complex fracture me-chanics approach for modeling the adhesive joint behavior, and (2) due to geometric disparity, the thin adhesive layer needed a very fine mesh comparing to the other parts in the car structure model. In order to evaluate a more realistic behavior of adhesive joints, a post-processing work has been developed here on the basis of a pre-existing GM car structure model. First, a sub-model including the adhesive joint was extracted from the original model and the adherends (steel parts) were remodeled in LS-DYNA as shell elements after a mesh refinement of 4.0 × 4.0 mm. An adhesive layer with a con-stant thickness of 0.4 mm was then inserted between the parts in the form of solid ele-ments (0.1 × 1.0 × 1.0 mm), Fig. 1. The nodal displaceele-ments of steel sheets in x-, y-, and

z- directions were then determined by interpolating from the original mesh for the par-ticular loading case. In the new sub-model, an elastic behavior was considered for the steel sheets while an isotropic elastoplastic model represented the adhesive mechanical characterization. The implicit solver of LS-DYNA was used to determine the adhesive stress field and nodal forces produced from the new nodal displacements. The strain energy release rate (G) in adhesive layer was determined from the results by using a vir-tual crack closure technique, Ref. [1]. The maximum calculated value of G was about 200 J/m2 for the particular loading case of this study that was much lower than the expe-rimentally measured critical value Gc for the toughened heat-cured epoxy adhesive, i.e.

2500 to 9000 J/m2 for the quasi-static tests ranging between mode-I and -II. The validity of results was also verified by performing similar analysis on the standard double-cantilever-beam joint after comparing the results with available experimental data.

Fig. 1: Remodeling a typical adhesive joint in car structure by LS-DYNA

REFERENCE

1. R. Krueger, “The virtual crack closure technique: History, approach and applications, NASA/CR-2002-211628, April 2002.

Figure

Fig. 1: Remodeling a typical adhesive joint in car structure by LS-DYNA  REFERENCE

Références

Documents relatifs

Or, s'il l'on observe un rapprochement entre le traitement du risque industriel et le traitement du risque nucléaire (ex le PPI de Tricastin traite à la fois du risque chimique et

Pour tirer profit de cette expérience, nous avons identifié l’ensemble des contraintes imposées par les pays clients du Chili et enquêté les dix plus gros exportateurs chiliens

In the communication, we will report in more details and on the basis of real cases the results of the combination of the different tools and approaches above mentioned, and

The GAO’s, NASA’s, and the DoD’s adoption of the technology readiness level (TRL) scale to improve technology management has led to the emergence of many TRL-based models that

/ La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur. Access

This paper describes the lighting and electrical performance of eleven different types of CF systems operating at 100, 110 and 120 V a c Performance parameters include

postzone allows us to tackle larger aircraft conflict avoidance problems because it reduces the time window where the direct method is applied, hence it reduces the number of

/ La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur. For