SURFACE MAGNETISM OF THE CLEAN Ni (111) SURFACE AND OF A Ni MONOLAYER ON Cu (111)

(1)

HAL Id: jpa-00228984

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00228984

Submitted on 1 Jan 1988

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of

sci-entific research documents, whether they are

pub-lished or not. The documents may come from

teaching and research institutions in France or

abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est

destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents

scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,

émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de

recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires

publics ou privés.

SURFACE MAGNETISM OF THE CLEAN Ni (111)

SURFACE AND OF A Ni MONOLAYER ON Cu (111)

C. Fu, A. Freeman

To cite this version:

(2)

JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE

Colloque C8, Suppl6ment au no 12, Tome 49, d6cembre 1988

SURFACE MAGNETISM OF THE CLEAN N i ( i i 1 ) SURFACE AND OF A Ni MONOLAYER ON Cu (ill)

C. L. Fu(') and A. J.

ree em an(^)

( I ) Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, T N 37831, U.S.A.

(2) Physics and Astronomy Department, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, U.S.A.

Abstract.

-

Results of highly precise all-electron local spin density FLAPW calculations on (i) a close-packed 7-layer Ni (111) slab and (ii) a p (1 x 1) Ni monolayer on Cu (111) are presented. For Ni ( I l l ) , we find an enhancement of the magnetic moment for both t h e surface (to 0.63 pB) and sub-surface Ni layers (from a center layer value of 0.58 pB). In contrast, a slight decrease of t h e magnetic hyperfine field a t the surface is obtained. Although the magnetism is suppressed for monolayer-Ni/Cu (111) due to s p (Cu) -d (Ni)interactions, we find that the Ni overlayer is not magnetically ''dead" but has a sizable but reduced moment of 0.34 pB/atom.

One of the remarkable features of transition metal Table I. - Theoretical layer-projected magnetic moments surfaces (or transition metals as overla~ers) is the re- (in PB) and magnetic h ~ ~ e ~ $ n e fields ( i n kGauss) broken tention and, in most cases, the enhancement of mag- down into core and conduction electron (CE) contributions

for the 7-layer Ni (111). netic moment at the surface compared t o bulk due to

the reduced symmetry and lower coordination num- ber of the surface atoms [I]

.

This observation holds for the open (100) and (110) surfaces of the magnetic 3d metals. However, for the experimentally most ac- cessible close-packed surfaces (i.e., (111) orientation), there has been far less theoretical effort devoted t o

b e study of their magnetic structure. This is due to the loss of cubic symmetry near the surface and hence the need for a more general full-potentia1 approach to treat surface related phenomena. Further, for the close-packed surface, there are less well-defined localized surface states compared with those of the more open surfaces. The immediate question thus arises as to whether 2-dimensional magnetism exists for a 3d transition-metal monolayer in contact with a nonmagnetic metal substrate even for the close-packed (111) orientation. One prototypical example is the Ni monolayer grown epitaxially on the Cu (111) substrate due to the close match of their lattice constant.

There are several factors which determine the size of the surface magnetic moment, i.e., the localization of the surface d-band, the position of the Fermi level (or charge transfer), and the hybridization of the magnetic Ni-d and nonmagnetic Cu-s,p electrons, which acts to quench the magnetism. In this paper, we present results of self-consistent all-electron local density func- tional calculations of the surface magnetism of Ni (111) and of a monolayer Ni/Cu (111) using the full-potential linearized augmented plane-wave (FLAPW) method [2]

.

Both systems are modelled by a single-slab ge- ometry consisting of 7 atomic layers. Relaxation of the interlayer spacing near the surface region is not included.

Table I summarizes our theoretical magnetic moments from the surface to center layer of the Ni (111) 7-

layer slab (the slab possesses inversion symmetry with respect to the center layer). As expected, the surface magnetic moment is enhanced but only by N 10% from

the bulk moment. However, due to its close-packed nature, the (111) surface magnetic moment (0.63 p ~ ) is less than that of the (100) surface (0.68 p ~ ) [3]

.

An un- expected result obtained from our calculation is that the sub-surface Ni (111) layer has essentially the same magnetic moment as that of the surface layer (c.f. Tab. I). This may be a direct consequence of the delocalized nature of the surface states for the (111) surface which interact strongly with the bulk states (i.e., resonant surface states). (Analysis of the electron states shows that the localized surface state near EF exists only

in vicinity of in the 2D Billouin zone). Neverthe- less, the layer-projected magnetic moment approaches its bulk value (0.56 p ~ ) just two layers beneath the surface-vacuum boundary.

Unlike the magnetic moment enhancement at the surface, the magnetic hyperfine field (contact term) remains almost constant for the surface layer compared to its "bulk-like" center layer value (c.f. Tab. I). A decomposition of the total hyperfine field into core and conduction electron (CE) contributions shows that : (1) the core contribution scales precisely with the layer-projected magnetic moment, namely

--

158 kG/pB ; and (2) the contribution from the con-

(3)

C8

-

1626 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE

duction electrons decreases in the surface layer, indi- cating a (somewhat) less covalent type indirect polarization (which is common to ferromagnetic bulk metals) for surface atoms. The increase in the hyperfine field for the sub-surface atoms is mostly due to the enhancement of the moment (and thus the magnitude of core polarization).

We now consider the possibility of 2D magnetism for a Ni monolayer on Cu (111). For the (100) surface, both theoretical calculation [4] and experiment [5] have confirmed a magnetic Ni overlayer on Cu (100) with a moment 0.4 pg. However, for the (111) orientation, the results remain controversial due to its close-packed nature. In a early pionneering study, Tersoff and Falicov [6] found that a "magnetic dead" layer for Ni/Cu (111) from their parameterized (from bulk) tight-binding calculation. Our self-consistent all-electron calculation shows that although the magnetism is suppressed for Ni/Cu(lll), the Ni overlayer is not magnetically dead. A sizable but reduced moment of 0.34 pg is found for the Ni overlayer on Cu (111). Since there is no appreciable averlapping between the d-bands on Ni and Cu, the suppression of magnetic moment (compared with that of the surface Ni (111) or its corresponding bulk value) is mostly due t o the hybridization between the non-magnetic Cu (s, p) electrons and the Ni (d) electrons, as sug- gested by Tersoff and Falicov [7]

.

As in the case of clean Ni surfaces, the reduction of the magnetic moment for Ni/Cu from (100) to (111) orientation is

0.05 pg.

The magnetic hyperfine field for the Ni overlayer is supressed to -80 kG due to the decrease of magnetic moment (with the same scale constant 160 kG/pB for core polarization). The -26

k G

CE contribution (mainly from states which have 4s components near the nucleus) remains essentially the same as that of the surface layer of Ni (111) with a covalent-type polarization character. Again, this indicates some hybridization between the Cu and Ni although the d-band sep- aration favors localization (and the direct type polarization for valence electrons).

Finally, some possible ways for experimentally con- firming our theoretical prediction on the magnetism of a Ni morrolayer onCu (111) include (1) electron capture spectroscopy to detect the spatial spin density distribution near the surface region, i.e. a nega- tive spin polarization in the vacuum region but the sign reversed to positive spin character at the surface layer-vacuum boundery ; (2) angular resolved photoe- mission to measure the exchange splitting (e 0.35 eV) of surface states near EF at the symmetry point M, and (3) Mossbauer or NMR spectroscopy to measure the hyperfine field for which we predict a decrease from its bulk value and to scale roughly with the local moment.

Acknowledgments

Work at Oak Ridge supported by the division of Materials Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC05-840R-21400 with Martin Merietta Energy System, Inc. Work at Northwestern University supported by the Office of Naval Research.

[I] For a review, see Freeman, A. J., Fu, C. L., Ohnishi, S. and Weinert, M., Polarized Electrons in Surface Physics, Ed. R. Feder (World Scien- tific Publishing Co., Ltd.) 1985, p.3.

[2]

Fu,

C. L., Weinert, M. and Freeman, A. J., (to be published) ; Wimmer, E., Krakauer, H., Weinert, M. and Freeman, A. J., Phys. Rev. B24 (1981) 864 and references therein.

[3] Wimmer, E., Freeman, A. J. and Krakauer, hl.,

Phys. Rev. B30 (1984) 3113.

[4] Wang, D., Freeman, A. J. and Krakauer, H, Phys.

Rev. B24 (1981) 1126.

[5] Thompson, M.A. and Erskine, J. O., Phys. Rev. B31 (1985) 6832.

[6] Tersoff, J. and Falicov, L. M., Phys. Rev. B26