HAL Id: hal-01065438
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01065438
Submitted on 18 Sep 2014
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of
sci-entific research documents, whether they are
pub-lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.
Liquid-liquid equilibria for ternary systems acetic acid +
n-butyl acetate + hydrocarbons at 293.15 K
Romain Richard, Nicolas Ferrando, Marc Jacquin
To cite this version:
Any correspondence concerning this service should be sent to the repository administrator:
[email protected]
Identification number: DOI : 10.1016/j.fluid.2013.07.032
Official URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2013.07.032
This is an author-deposited version published in:
http://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/
Eprints ID: 12000
To cite this version:
Richard, Romain and Ferrando, Nicolas and Jacquin, Marc Liquid-liquid
equilibria for ternary systems acetic acid + n-butyl acetate + hydrocarbons at
293.15 K. (2013) Fluid Phase Equilibria, vol. 356 . pp. 264-270. ISSN
0378-3812
O
pen
A
rchive
T
oulouse
A
rchive
O
uverte (
OATAO
)
Liquid–liquid
equilibria
for
ternary
systems
acetic
acid
+
n-butyl
acetate
+
hydrocarbons
at
293.15
K
Romain
Richard
a,
Nicolas
Ferrando
b,
Marc
Jacquin
a,∗aIFPEnergiesnouvelles,RondPointdel’échangeurdeSolaize,BP3,69360Solaize,France bIFPEnergiesnouvelles,1-4AvenuedeBois-Préau,92852Rueil-Malmaison,France
Keywords:
Liquid–liquidequilibriumdata Ternarymixture
Hydrocarbons UNIQUACmodel
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Liquid–liquid equilibrium data for acetic acid+n-butyl acetate+hydrocarbons ternary systems at T=293.15Karereportedinthiswork.Theeffectofhydrocarbonchainlengthonliquid–liquidequilibrium isdeterminedanddiscussed.Aliphatichydrocarbonssuchashexadecane,dodecaneanddecanewere particularlyinvestigated.Theorganicchemicals(estersandhydrocarbons)werequantifiedbygas chro-matographyusingaflameionizationdetectorwhileaceticacidwasquantifiedbytitrationwithsodium hydroxide.Experimentaltie-linedatafortheternarymixtureswerecorrelatedusingOthmer–Tobias, BachmanandHandcorrelationsinordertoshowthereliabilityoftheexperimentalresults.Finally,these experimentaldatawerecorrelatedwiththeUNIQUACmodel.Itappearedthatthismodelprovidesagood correlationofthesolubilitycurvewiththesethreehydrocarbons.
1. Introduction
Lowmolecularweightestersaremostcommonlysynthesized bydirectesterificationofcarboxylicacidswithalcoholsin pres-enceofacidcatalystsbyeithera batchor acontinuousprocess
[1–4].Estersareessentialforthefragranceandflavouringindustry. n-butylacetate(BA)isawidelyknownesterusedasasolventin theproductionoflacquersforexample,butmorecommonlyasa syntheticappleflavouringusedinfoodindustry[5].Productionof BAincreasedinthelastdecadebecauseitslowtoxicityandlow environmentalimpactcomparedwithotheresters[6].
Industrially,themostcommonlyusedseparationprocessesfor suchequilibrium-limitedreversiblereactionsis reactive distilla-tion[7,8].Nevertheless,inthecaseofbutylacetate,distillationis high-energyconsumingduetolowrelativevolatilitiesbetweenthe carboxylicacidandtheester.Indeed,theboilingpointsofacetic acid(118◦C)andbutylacetate(126◦C)arerelativelyclose,and
thusseparationbydistillationrequireahighernumberofstageand refluxratioincomparisontootheresters.Withtheincreasingprice ofenergy,alternativeseparationtechniqueshavetobeconsidered, inordertoreducetheenergyconsumptionassociatedwiththe sep-arationofthecomponents.Inthisstudy,wefocusonliquid–liquid extractionoftheprincipalproduct,n-butylacetate(BA)fromthe remainingreactant,aceticacid(AA),thesemixturebeingasingle homogeneousphase.Thistechniqueisofconsiderableeconomic
importanceinthechemicalindustryandmaybeconsideredeither attheendofthereactionorduringthereactioninordertoshiftthe equilibrium.Thenatureofsolventnaturallyinfluencesthe equilib-riumcharacteristicsofBAextractionfromAAsolutions.Previous worksgivesomedataonphaseequilibriumforsystemssuchas aceticacidandbutan-1-ol[9]orternarysystemswithaceticacid, waterandesters[10]oralcohols[11–13].Inthisstudy,aliphatic hydrocarbons(HCs),fromhexane(C6)tohexadecane(C16),were usedasorganicsolvent.Someliquid–liquidequilibrium(LLE)data forsuchternarysystemsAA–BA–HCwereobtainedatT=293.15K, underatmosphericpressure.
Firstofall,mutualsolubilityofAAandHCswerestudiedinorder todeterminesuitablesolventsforliquid–liquidextractionofBA inexcessofAA.LLEresultsfortheternarysystemsAA+BA+HC presentinga biphasicareaaregivenin this work.Moreover,to showtheconsistencyofourexperimentalresults,tie-linedatawere correlatedusingOthmer–Tobias,BachmanandHandcorrelations. Finally,experimentalternarydiagramswerecomparedwithdata calculatedwiththeUNIQUACmodel.Thismodelmayprovidea goodcorrelationofthesolubilitycurvewiththehydrocarbonsof interest.
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials
Allchemicals(n-butylacetate,glacialaceticacid, hexaneC6, octaneC8,decaneC10,dodecaneC12andhexadecaneC16)were purchasedfromSigma–Aldrich.Theywereofguaranteedreagent
Table1
Compositionsofinitialmixtures,experimentaltie-lines,solutedistributionratios,Dandselectivity,Sforternarysystems[AA+BA+HC]atT=293.15K.
Initialcomposition AA-richphase HC-richphase D S
wAA wBA wHC wAA wBA wHC wAA wBA wHC Octane 0.500 0.000 0.500 0.747 0.000 0.253 0.266 0.000 0.734 – – 0.495 0.010 0.495 – – – – – – – – Decane 0.500 0.000 0.500 0.846 0.000 0.154 0.217 0.000 0.783 – – 0.490 0.020 0.490 0.811 0.030 0.159 0.252 0.017 0.731 0.577 1.714 0.480 0.040 0.480 0.748 0.058 0.194 0.288 0.038 0.674 0.656 1.626 0.475 0.050 0.475 0.713 0.069 0.218 0.316 0.047 0.637 0.688 1.768 0.470 0.060 0.470 0.655 0.081 0.264 0.359 0.064 0.577 0.800 1.462 0.462 0.075 0.463 – – – – – – – – Dodecane 0.500 0.000 0.500 0.881 0.000 0.119 0.153 0.000 0.847 – – 0.487 0.025 0.488 0.855 0.044 0.101 0.175 0.020 0.805 0.451 2.206 0.474 0.050 0.476 0.806 0.079 0.115 0.192 0.039 0.769 0.490 2.055 0.462 0.075 0.463 0.761 0.105 0.134 0.219 0.061 0.720 0.581 2.018 0.450 0.100 0.450 0.699 0.131 0.170 0.258 0.091 0.651 0.696 1.889 0.437 0.125 0.438 0.594 0.155 0.251 0.333 0.120 0.547 0.775 1.383 0.425 0.150 0.425 – – – – – – – – Hexadecane 0.500 0.000 0.500 0.948 0.000 0.052 0.098 0.000 0.902 – – 0.475 0.050 0.475 0.872 0.083 0.045 0.110 0.030 0.860 0.357 2.821 0.450 0.100 0.450 0.765 0.167 0.068 0.128 0.065 0.807 0.391 2.328 0.425 0.150 0.425 0.705 0.219 0.076 0.129 0.100 0.771 0.460 2.520 0.400 0.200 0.400 0.583 0.272 0.145 0.187 0.167 0.646 0.614 1.913 0.387 0.225 0.388 0.521 0.290 0.189 0.222 0.208 0.570 0.716 1.683 0.375 0.250 0.375 0.433 0.289 0.278 0.292 0.239 0.469 0.826 1.222 0.362 0.275 0.363 – – – – – – – –
gradeandtheirpuritiesarereportedbythesuppliertobehigher than99%.Theywereusedwithoutanyfurtherpurificationasno impuritiesweredetectedusinggaschromatographywithaflame ionizationdetector(GC-FID).Theamountofwaterinaceticacid wasdeterminedusingaKarl–Fisherapparatus(831KFCoulometer, Metrohm),thisvaluebeingof396+/−54ppm.
2.2. Procedure
Ternary mixtures ofknown composition(AA+BA+HC)were preciselypreparedinclosedvialsandmixedduringatleast3hat 293.15K.Theaccuracyofthetemperatureis1K.Thetotalweight of each sample was approximately 40g. Whenthe thermody-namicequilibriumwasachieved,thesystemseparatedintotwo liquidphasesthatbecametransparentwithawell-defined inter-face.Afterthisdecantation,thelowerphasecontainingmainlyAA andtheremainingHC-richupperphaseweresuccessivelycollected andweighted.Afterseparation,samplesofbothphaseswerestill transparentandwerecarefullyanalyzedtodeterminetheir com-positionsinordertobuildtheLLEtie-lines.
2.3. Analysismethods
Ternarymixtureswereanalyzedbygaschromatography(GC) usinganAgilentTechnologiesapparatus(6890NNetworkGC Sys-tem) coupled to a flame ionization detector (FID) in order to determineBAandHCamounts.Separationwascarriedoutwitha capillarycolumn(HP-FFAPcolumn,50m,0.32mm,0.50mm)from AgilentJ&WGCColumns.Thechromatographwasequippedwith anautomaticsplitinjectorandtheinjections(0.5mL)were per-formedwithasplitratioof100.Thecarriergaswasheliumandthe columnheadpressurewasadjustedto15psi.Injectortemperature was220◦C.Temperatureintheovenwasheld14minat90◦C,then
rampedto200◦Cat10◦Cmin−1andfinallyheld5minat200◦C.
Thetotalrunningtimewas30min.Thetemperatureofthe detec-tor(FID)was250◦C.Eachsamplewasanalyzedthreetimesand
thevaluesofmassfractionsgiveninthispaperaretheaverageof
thethreeinjections.Theuncertaintyisu(w)=0.001,which corre-spondstothemaximumstandarddeviationcalculated.AAcould alsobequantifiedbyGC-FIDbutresultsarelessreliable.
Thatiswhyanautomatictitrator(751GPDTitrino,Metrohm) wasusedtodeterminethequantityofAAineachsample.We veri-fiedthatnohydrolysisofBAoccursduringthetitrationwithsodium hydroxide(0.1M),withstandardmixturesofAAandBAoverthe wholerangeofcomposition.ThepHofthesolutionwasmeasured throughout thetitration thankstoanelectrode, accuracybeing moreimportantwithanelectrodethananindicator.Theendpoint correspondstoasuddenchangeinthemeasuredpH,andthenthe
Fig.2.TernarydiagramforLLEof[AA+BA+decane]atT=293.15K;(··· ···)UNIQUACtie-linedata,(—)UNIQUACsolubilitycurve,(-d-)experimentaltie-linedata.
equivalencepointallowsthedeterminationofAAamountinthe sample.
3. Resultsanddiscussion
3.1. LLEexperimentalresults
First ofall, miscibilityof acetic acidwithhydrocarbonswas determined.ItwasnoticedthatAAandhexaneweremiscibleinall proportionswhereasAAandalltheotherhydrocarbonspresentan incompletemutualsolubility.TheresultsarereportedinTable1
(lineswitha butylacetatemassfractionwBAequaltozero) and
representedinFig.1.Itisexperimentallyshownthatthebiphasic areaislargerwhenthehydrocarbonchainlengthincreases. Con-cerningthesystemAA+BA+C8,asit canbenoticedinTable1, withonly1%ofBA(wBA=0.01),themixtureismonophasic,which
meansthatthebiphasicareaofthissystemisverysmall.Thatis
whywedidnotrepresentaphasediagramofthissystem.TheLLE diagramsfortheotherternarysystemswitheachhydrocarbonare plottedinFigs.2–4.Because(HC+AA)isaliquidpairthatispartially miscibleandthetwootherliquidpairs(BA+AA)and(BA+HC)are completelymiscible,theternarysystemsbehaveastype-ILLE[14]. Inordertoevaluatetheextractingcapabilityofthehydrocarbon solventfortheseparationoftheesterfromacidicsolutions,the selectivity(S) and solute distributionratio (D) were calculated fromexperimentaldataaccordingtofollowingEqs.(1)–(2):
S=w HC BA×wAAAA wAA BA×wHCAA (1) D=w HC BA wAA BA (2) wherewisthemassfraction,subscriptsBAandAArefer respec-tively to n-butyl acetate and acetic acid, and superscripts HC
Fig.4.TernarydiagramforLLEof[AA+BA+hexadecane]atT=293.15K;(···△···)experimentalsolubilitycurve,(—)UNIQUACsolubilitycurve,(-N-)experimentaltie-line data.
and AA represent thehydrocarbon-rich phase and theAA-rich phase, respectively. Values of S and Dare reportedin Table 1. Theseparametersarewidelyusedforevaluatingthesolvent(HC) efficiencyinunitoperationssuchasliquid–liquidextraction.The distribution coefficient is related to the extracting capacity of BAintheHCanddeterminestheamountofHCneededforthe extractionprocess,whiletheselectivityisrelatedtothenumber ofstagesneededintheseparationprocess.Theoretically,higher selectivitycorrespondstofewerstagesrequiredforagiven sep-arationprocessandahigherdistributioncoefficientcorresponds toaloweramountofsolventneededforagivenseparation,and consequentlyasmallerapparatusandloweroperatingcosts.The selectivityasafunctionofsolutedistributionratiosforthethree studied ternary systems is plotted for all initial compositions andparticularlyforaninitialcompositionofwBA=0.05inFig.5.
Fig.5.(a)SelectivitySasafunctionofsolutedistributionratioDforthethree sys-tems[AA+BA+HC]withHC:(d)decane,()dodecane,(N)hexadecane;(b)example forinitialcompositionwBA=0.05.
As it was expected, the selectivity decreases with the solute distributionratio, whichinvolvesa compromise betweenthese two parameters,i.e. betweenthesizeof theapparatusandthe amountofsolventneeded.Nosignificantdifferencesareobserved between thethree hydrocarbons.Nevertheless, as the biphasic areabecomeslargerwhenthelengthofhydrocarbonincreases, hexadecanemaybeanappropriatesolventforthisliquid–liquid extractioninordertocollectanextractwithhigherpurity.
3.2. Consistencyoftie-linedata
Inthiswork,theOthmer–Tobiascorrelation[15](Eq.(3)),the Bachmancorrelation[16](Eq.(4))andtheHandcorrelation[17]
(Eq.(5))wereusedtoensurethequalityoftheobtained experi-mentaltie-linedata:
ln
1 −wHCHC wHC HC =A+Bln 1 −wAAAA wAA AA (3) wHC BA=A′+B′ wHC BA wAAAA (4) ln wAA BA wAA AA =A′′+B′′ln wHC BA wHC HC (5)where w is the mass fraction, subscripts BA, HC and AA refer respectivelyton-butylacetate,hydrocarbonandaceticacid,and superscriptsHCandAArepresentthehydrocarbon-richphaseand theAA-richphase,respectively;A,B,A’,B’,A′′andB′′,the
param-etersoftheOthmer–Tobiascorrelation,theBachmancorrelation andtheHandcorrelation,respectively.Thecorrelationparameters and thecorrelationfactor R2 values weredeterminedby a
par-tialleast-squaresregression. Thecorrelatedresultsarereported inTable2.TheOthmer–Tobias,BachmanandHandplotsarealso showninFigs.6–8,respectively,forthethreeinvestigatedsystems withdecane,dodecaneandhexadecane.AsseenfromTable2and
Figs.6–8,theclosenessofthecorrelationfactorR2tounityand
Table2
ConstantsofOthmer–Tobias,BachmanandHandequationssystem.
Hydrocarbon Othmer–Tobiascorrelation Bachmancorrelation Handcorrelation
A B R2 A′ B′ R2 A′ ′ B′ ′ R2
Decane 0.258 0.892 0.995 0.002 0.656 0.992 −0.332 0.785 0.994 Dodecane 0.145 0.919 0.995 0.007 0.594 0.981 −0.220 0.727 0.994 Hexadecane −0.246 0.907 0.966 0.023 0.435 0.961 0.159 0.707 0.982
3.3. Correlationmodel
Experimentaldataarethuscorrelated withtheexcess Gibbs freeenergymodelUNIQUAC[18].Theexpressionoftheactivity coefficientofthecompoundiisgiveninthefollowingEq.(6):
ln i=ln i xi +1−i xi −z 2
ln i i +1−i i +qi"
1−lnX
N j=1jji −X
N j=1 jjiP
N k=1kkj#
(6)Fig.6.Othmer–Tobiasplotforthe[AA+BA+HC]ternarysystemsatT=293.15K withHC:(d)decane,()dodecane,(N)hexadecane.
Fig.7.Bachmanplotforthe[AA+BA+HC]ternarysystemsatT=293.15KwithHC: (d)decane,()dodecane,(N)hexadecane.
Table3
StructuralparametersoftheUNIQUACmodel.
Compound r(m2/kmol) q(m3/kmol)
Aceticacid 5.180×108 0.0333 n-Butylacetate 1.049×109 0.0732 Decane 1.504×109 0.1092 Dodecane 1.774×109 0.1296 Hexadecane 2.314×109 0.1706 Table4
OptimizedUNIQUACbinaryparameters.
Pair Bij(K) Bji(K) AA+BA 29.006 80.708 AA+C10 −18.535 −270.071 AA+C12 −26.558 −270.500 AA+C16 −14.638 −333.271 BA+C10 50.602 42.413 BA+C12 16.526 54.114 BA+C16 8.937 35.641 with: i= xiri
P
N j=1xjrj (7) i=P
xNiqi j=1xjqj (8) z=10(coordinationnumber) (9) ij=exp Bij T (10) wherexstandsforthemolarfraction,Nthenumberofcomponents,Tthetemperature(K)andBijanempiricalasymmetricbinary
inter-actionparameter.Thepurecompoundstructuralparametersrand
Table5
Calculatedtie-lineswiththeUNIQUACmodel(massfractions).
Initialcomposition AA-richphase HC-richphase rmsd(%)
wAA wBA wHC wAA wBA wHC wAA wBA wHC Decane 0.500 0.000 0.500 0.846 0.000 0.154 0.217 0.000 0.783 2.45 0.490 0.020 0.490 0.796 0.025 0.180 0.236 0.016 0.748 0.480 0.040 0.480 0.743 0.047 0.210 0.261 0.034 0.705 0.475 0.050 0.475 0.715 0.058 0.227 0.277 0.043 0.680 0.470 0.060 0.470 0.684 0.068 0.248 0.295 0.053 0.652 Dodecane 0.500 0.000 0.500 0.915 0.000 0.085 0.168 0.000 0.832 2.14 0.487 0.025 0.488 0.861 0.036 0.103 0.179 0.016 0.805 0.474 0.050 0.476 0.808 0.068 0.124 0.193 0.035 0.772 0.462 0.075 0.462 0.754 0.097 0.149 0.213 0.056 0.731 0.450 0.100 0.450 0.697 0.123 0.180 0.238 0.080 0.682 0.437 0.125 0.438 0.632 0.146 0.222 0.273 0.107 0.619 Hexadecane 0.500 0.000 0.500 0.967 0.000 0.033 0.088 0.000 0.912 2.65 0.475 0.050 0.475 0.870 0.080 0.050 0.095 0.022 0.883 0.450 0.100 0.450 0.780 0.146 0.074 0.109 0.053 0.838 0.425 0.150 0.425 0.692 0.201 0.107 0.131 0.094 0.775 0.400 0.200 0.400 0.597 0.246 0.157 0.167 0.146 0.687 0.387 0.225 0.388 0.542 0.264 0.194 0.194 0.176 0.630 0.375 0.250 0.375 0.474 0.277 0.249 0.234 0.212 0.554
q(vanderWaalsareaandvanderWaalsvolume,respectively)are extractedfromtheDIPPRdatabase[19]andarereportedinTable3. TheinteractionbinaryparametersBijaresimultaneouslyadjusted
toreproducetheexperimentalmutualsolubilitiesoftheternary systems investigated.The objective function(OF) minimized in ordertodetermineoptimalparametersisgivenbyEq.(11):
OF=
X
M i=1X
N j=1 1− Kijexp Kcalc ij!
2 (11) whereMisthenumberofexperimentaldataandNthenumberof components.Kijisthemolardistributionratioofthecompoundjfortheithexperiment,definedbyEq.(12):
Kij= xAA ij xHC ij (12) wherexdenotesthemolarfraction,andthesuperscriptsAAand HC stand for the acetic acid-rich phase and hydrocarbon-rich phase,respectively.OptimizedbinaryparametersBijarereported
inTable4.
Toevaluatethemodelperformanceforeachsystemstudied,a root-meansquaredeviation(rmsd)betweentheexperimentaland calculatedcompositionsinbothphasesiscalculatedusingEq.(13):
rmsd=100·
r
P
M i=1P
N j=1$
xAA,exp ij −x AA,calc ij 2 +$
xHC,exp ij −x HC,calc ij 2 2MN (13)CalculatedvaluesaswellasrmsdarereportedinTable5.The modelresultsarefoundinwellagreementwithexperimental val-ues,withamaximalrmsdof2.65%fortheAA+BA+C16mixture. Our values of rmsdare similarto values ofprevious works on ternarysystems[20,21].
4. Conclusion
Liquid–liquid equilibrium (LLE) data for the systems acetic acid+n-butylacetate+hydrocarbonsweredeterminedat293.15K andatmosphericpressure.Asitwasshownthathexaneandacetic acidweremiscibleinallproportions,ternarymixtureswerenot feasible. Nevertheless, all the other investigated systems from octanetohexadecaneformedatype-IphasediagramofLLE.The two-phaseregionincreasedwithincreasingthehydrocarbonchain lengthfortheternarysystemsstudied.Moreover,consistencyof
experimentaldatahasbeenshownusingOthmer–Tobias,Bachman andHandcorrelations.Ingeneral,experimentaldatacouldbe prop-erlycorrelatedusinganUNIQUACmodel.Thephasediagramsofthe systemsaceticacid+n-butylacetate+hydrocarbonscanbeusedin liquid–liquidextractionpracticeandasreferencedata.
Listofsymbols
A,B Othmer–Tobiascorrelationconstants
A′,B′ Bachmancorrelationconstants
A′′,B′′ Handcorrelationconstants
Bij UNIQUACbinaryinteractionparameter
C6 hexane C8 octane C10 decane C12 dodecane C16 hexadecane
D solutedistributionratio(inmass)
M numberofexperimentaldata
N numberofcomponents
K molardistributionratio OF objectivefunction
q molecularpurecompoundstructuralparameter,vander Waalsvolume(m3/kmol)
r molecularpurecompoundstructuralparameters,vander Waalsarea,(m2/kmol)
R2 Othmer–Tobias,Bachman,Handcorrelationcoefficients
rmsd rootmeansquaredeviation
S selectivity
T temperature(K)
w concentrationinmassfraction
x concentrationinmolefraction
Superscripts
References
[1]Z.Chen,T.Iizuka,K.Tanabe,ChemistryLetters13(1984)1085–1088.
[2]S.Okazaki,N.Wada,CatalysisToday16(1993)349–359.
[3]M.Hino,K.Arata,ChemistryLetters10(1981)1671–1672.
[4]Y.Izumi,R.Hasebe,K.Urabe,JournalofCatalysis84(1983)402–409.
[5]Kirk-Othmer,EncyclopediaofChemicalTechnology,4thed.,Wiley,NewYork,
1994.
[6]A.Arpornwichanop,K.Koomsup,W.Kiatkittipong,P.Praserthdam,S.
Assabum-rungrat,JournaloftheTaiwanInstituteofChemicalEngineers40(2009)21–28.
[7]E.Sert,F.S.Atalay,Chemical&BiochemicalEngineeringQuarterly25(2011)
221–227.
[8]H.Tian,Z.Huang,T.Qiu,X.Wang,Y.Wu,ChineseJournalofChemical
Engi-neering20(2012)980–987.
[9]E.Lladosa,J.B.Montón,M.C.Burguet,R.Mu ˜noz,JournalofChemical&
Engi-neeringData53(2007)108–115.
[10]C.Zhang,H.Wan,L.Xue,G.Guan,FluidPhaseEquilibria305(2011)68–75.
[11]N.A.Darwish,M.A.Abdulkarim,I.Ashour,A.M.Dwaidar,F.S.Athamneh,Fluid
PhaseEquilibria200(2002)277–285.
[12]T.Gündogdu,S.C¸ehreli,FluidPhaseEquilibria331(2012)26–32.
[13]M.M.Esquível,M.G.Bernardo-Gil,FluidPhaseEquilibria62(1991)97–107.
[14]R.E.Treybal,LiquidExtraction,McGraw-Hill,NewYork,1963.
[15]D.Othmer,P.Tobias,Industrial&EngineeringChemistry34(1942)693–696.
[16]I.Bachman,IndustrialandEngineeringChemistry,AnalyticalEdition12(1940)
38–39.
[17]D.B.Hand,TheJournalofPhysicalChemistry34(1929)1961–2000.
[18]D.S.Abrams,J.M.Prausnitz,AIChEJournal21(1975)116–128.
[19]R.L.Rowley,W.Wilding,V.J.L.Oscarson,Y.Yang,N.A.Zundel,T.E.Daubert,
R.P.Danner,DIPPR®DataCompilationofPureCompoundsProperties,Design
InstituteforPhysicalProperties,AIChE,NewYork,2003.
[20]H.GhanadzadehGilani,A.GhanadzadehGilani,S.Shekarsaraee,H.Uslu,Fluid
PhaseEquilibria316(2012)109–116.
[21]H.GhanadzadehGilani,G.Khiati,A.K.Haghi,FluidPhaseEquilibria247(2006)