• Aucun résultat trouvé

AcademiaPolicymaking Adaptability

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "AcademiaPolicymaking Adaptability"

Copied!
21
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Nature-based solutions for climate

change adaptation and mitigation:

How have they been incorporated into

climate policies in Latin America?

Session T12b: Ecosystem services 

and climate change

October 18, 2016 

Bruno Locatelli

1,2

; Raffaele Vignola

3

; Diego Padilla

2

1: CIRAD France, 2: CIFOR Peru, 3: CATIE Costa Rica

(2)

New Peruvian Strategy

on Forests and Climate

Change, 21 July 2016

(3)

The 2016 Peruvian strategy was

not made from scratch

National strategy on forests and climate change 2016

(list: Pramova et al., 2015)

2002: 

Basic vision

2016: 

Complete 

vision

(4)

Evolving conceptualizations

on ecosystem services and climate change

Ac

ademia

Po

licymaking

?

Socioecological 

systems

Transformation 

pathways

Adapt

ability

Time

Resilience

Telecoupling

Tradeoffs

(5)
(6)

Analyzing policy documents on

ecosystems and climate change

8 countries in Latin America and the Caribbean

Diverse political positions (economy, climate change, environment)

Here results for Chile, Costa Rica and Peru

BRA

BOL

CHI

PER

ECU

CRI

NIC

CUB

DOM

Policy document selection

National communications to UNFCCC,

National CC strategies, National

forest policies with CC content, etc.

40 documents

Document analysis

Reading full texts and coding (with

Nvivo)

(7)

Ecosystems and CC: Basic view

1

Ecosystems store carbon for CC mitigation

1

2

CC will affect ecosystems

2

3

3

CC impacts on ecosystems will affect local communities

(8)

What is wrong with the basic view

1

Ecosystems store 

carbon for CC 

mitigation

1

Focus on CC mitigation services (ecosystems =

carbon)

Measures aim at storing carbon (REDD+)

(9)

What is wrong with the basic view

Adaptation is seen through ecological impacts

If CC does not affect ecosystems, there is no problem

As knowledge is missing on how to adapt ecosystems, there are no

measures proposed

Focus on future problems, not current ones

2

2

CC will affect 

(10)

What is wrong with the basic view

Social aspects are overlooked

Focus on local populations using forest products

No consideration of how the whole society benefits from adaptation

services

-

E.g., a city vulnerable to flooding downstream a forest

3

CC impacts on 

ecosystems will affect 

local communities

(11)

Ecosystems and adaptation: Advanced view

4

Ecosystems provide adaptation services (water regul, etc.)

4

5

… that help society facing climate problems (now & later) 

5

6

… and must be protected against multiple pressures

6

(12)

1

2

3

4

5

6

Ecosystems and CC: the complete view

1

3

2

Ecosystem‐based mitigation

(carbon, REDD+)

Ecosystem‐based adaptation

(adaptation services, EbA in 

watersheds, cities, coasts, local communities, etc.)

4 5

6

Ecosystem resilience 

(against human and climatic pressures)

Integrated approach 

(to avoid tradeoffs, maximize synergies)

(13)

Adaptation and mitigation

are often separated

In international negotiations and

agreements => In national

policies

Even though ecosystem

management contributes to both

Risks:

Adverse affects:

-

mitigation can increase local

vulnerability

-

adaptation can increase global

emissions

Missed opportunities

Policy incoherence

(14)

Pr

esence

 of

 ke

co

ncepts

 

re

la

te

d

 to

 the

 4

 appr

oaches

Evolution of policy

document contents

Towards a more complete view of 

ecosystems and climate change

(15)

Why drives these changes?

The decision context is increasingly made explicit in the

policy documents

Values, Rules and Knowledge (VRK)

E.g., importance of equity and participation (V), involvement

of multiple stakeholders, multi-level governance, land tenure

(R), traditional and local knowledge (K)

time

(16)

Conclusions

Policy document analysis shows clear

evolution of the conceptualization of

ecosystem-based approaches to climate

change

More coherent and integrated

Transformation Pathways?

Missing info on policy implementation

V

R

K

Decision 

context

Situation

Decision

Implementation

New 

situation

V

R

K

New 

decision 

context

(17)

Thank you!

(18)

Further reading

Locatelli B., Pavageau C., Pramova E., Di Gregorio M., 2015. Integrating climate change mitigation and adaptation in agriculture and forestry: Opportunities and trade-offs. WIREs Climate

Change 6(6): 585-598. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wcc.357/pdf

 Locatelli B., Catterall C.P., Imbach P., Kumar C., Lasco R., Marín-Spiotta E., Mercer B., Powers J.S., Schwartz N., Uriarte M., 2015. Tropical reforestation and climate change: Beyond carbon.

Restoration Ecology 23(4): 337-343. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/rec.12209/epdf

Locatelli B., Imbach B., Wunder S., 2013. Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services in Costa Rica. Environmental Conservation

http://www.journals.cambridge.org/article_S0376892913000234

Pramova E., Locatelli B., Djoudi H., Somorin O., 2012. Forests and trees for social adaptation to climate variability and change. WIREs Climate Change 3:581–596.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wcc.195/pdf

Pramova E., Locatelli B., Brockhaus M., Fohlmeister S., 2012. Ecosystem services in the National Adaptation Programmes of Action. Climate Policy 12(4): 393-409.

(19)

Further reading

Guariguata M.R., Locatelli B., Haupt F., 2012. Adapting tropical production forests to global climate change: risk perceptions and actions. International Forestry Review 14(1), 27-38. http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/articles/AGuariguata1201.pdf

Locatelli B., Evans V., Wardell A., Andrade A., Vignola R., 2011. Forests and Climate Change in Latin America: Linking adaptation and mitigation. Forests 2(1): 431-450.

http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/2/1/431/pdf

CIFOR 2013. Mitigation–Adaptation Synergies. CIFOR Brief

http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/factsheet/4263-factsheet.pdf

Locatelli B., 2011. Synergies between adaptation and mitigation in a nutshell. COBAM Brief, CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia, 4p.

http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/cobambrief/3619-cobambrief.pdf

 Locatelli, B., Kanninen, M., Brockhaus, M., Colfer, C.J.P., Murdiyarso, D. and Santoso, H. 2008. Facing an uncertain future: How forests and people can adapt to climate change. Forest Perspectives no. 5. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia, 97 p.

(20)

Para saber más

Pramova E., Locatelli B., Djoudi H., Somorin O., 2012. Bosques y árboles para la adaptación social al cambio y la variabilidad del clima. Brief. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) Bogor, Indonesia.

http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/infobrief/4024-infobrief.pdf

Locatelli, B., Evans, V., Wardell, A., Andrade, A., Vignola, R., 2011. Bosques y cambio climático en América Latina: Vincular adaptación y mitigación, In: Gobernanza forestal y REDD+: Desafíos para las políticas y mercados en América Latina. Petkova E., Larson A., Pacheco P. (eds.). CIFOR, Bogor, pp. 79-95.

http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/Books/BPetkova1101.pdf

Locatelli, B., Kanninen, M., Brockhaus, M., Colfer, C.J.P., Murdiyarso, D. and Santoso, H. 2009. Ante un futuro incierto: Cómo se pueden adaptar los bosques y las comunidades al cambio

climático.

http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/publications/pdf_files/Books/BLocatelli0901.pdf

Pramova E., Di Gregorio M., Locatelli B., 2015. Integración de la adaptación y la mitigación en las políticas sobre cambio climático y uso de la tierra en el Perú. Working Paper 189. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR. http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/WPapers/WP189Pramova.pdf

Chazarin F., Locatelli B., Garay-Rodríguez M., 2014. Mitigación en la selva, adaptación en la

sierra y la costa: ¿Oportunidades perdidas de sinergias frente al cambio climático en Perú? Ambiente y Desarrollo 18(35): 95-107. doi:10.11144/Javeriana.AyD18-35.msas

(21)

Pour en savoir plus

Pramova E., Locatelli B., Djoudi H., Somorin O., 2012. Le rôle des forêts et des arbres

dans l’adaptation sociale à la variabilité et au changement climatiques. Brief. Center

for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) Bogor, Indonesia

http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/infobrief/4023-infobrief.pdf

Locatelli B., 2011. Les synergies entre adaptation et atténuation en quelques mots. COBAM Brief, CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia, 4p.

http://goo.gl/lcvTZ

 Locatelli, B., Kanninen, M., Brockhaus, M., Colfer, C.J.P., Murdiyarso, D. and Santoso, H. 2009. Face à un avenir incertain : comment les forêts et les populations peuvent

s'adapter au changement climatique

Références

Documents relatifs

In this presentation, we argue that a regionally-tailored Climate- Smart Forestry approach is needed to (a) increase the total forest area and avoid deforestation, (b)

In developing countries, in contrast, households which are dependent on keeping livestock may be much more vulnerable to changes in climate and climate variability, with

There was a high number of documents focusing on situation analysis (as part of information for policy making, in the stage of agenda setting) and the integration of climate in

The Green Climate Fund could test innovative approaches to the integration of adaptation and mitigation and stimulate changes at the national level in recipient countries and at

Scholars in the Transformative Adaptation Research Alliance have proposed a framework for analyzing nature-based adaptation based on three pillars: adaptation services (contribution

The importance of ecosystem services are discussed in all but two documents, with the most text passages found in the Climate Change Adaptation and Risk Management Plan for

Across all study areas, more than 80% of the farmers believe in CC and more than 60% observe a CC-effect on their on-farm yields (especially in Africa). However, less than 50% of

[r]