• Aucun résultat trouvé

(4) a ij (x) ~, ~j (a" u,,b = 0 (1) NOTE ON A LEMMA OF FINN AND GILBARG

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "(4) a ij (x) ~, ~j (a" u,,b = 0 (1) NOTE ON A LEMMA OF FINN AND GILBARG"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

N O T E O N A L E M M A O F F I N N A N D G I L B A R G

BY

L. E. P A Y N E and H. F. W E I N B E R G E R University of Maryland (1)

I n t h e preceding paper [1] it was shown b y F i n n a n d Gilbarg t h a t if u satisfics t h e elliptic differential e q u a t i o n

(a" u,,b = 0 (1)

in a n n-dimensional d o m a i n D c o n t a i n i n g t h e exterior St, of a sphere of radius r 0 a n d if t h e coefficients a ~i a n d t h e solution u b e h a v e suitably a t infinity, t h e n

A (r) = f a ~ J u , i u j d V (2)

S r

exists for r > r 0 a n d

where ~ = m i n [ ( n - 2), 2 I / n - 1].

A (r) ~< A (ro) (3)

I n t h e case of L a p l a c e ' s equation, it is easily SCell t h a t (3) holds with ~ replaced b y n - 2 , which is greater t h a n 2 for large n. Thus, (3) is n o t sharp.

W e shall replace (3) b y a sharp a s y m p t o t i c estimate u n d e r t h e a s s u m p t i o n t h a t a ij approaches t h e u n i t m a t r i x at infinity. As is p o i n t e d o u t in [1], if a ij approaches a n y positive definite matrix, one can m a k e this limit t h e u n i t m a t r i x b y means of a coordinate t r a n s f o r m a t i o n .

We define t h e t w o f u n c t i o n s

a ij (x) ~, ~j

a 0 ( r ) =

... ~

inf l,s

~: ~,~ (4)

Ixl_>r

(1) This research was supported by the United States Air Force through the Air Force office of Scientific Research of the Air Research and Development Command under contract No.

AF 18(600)-573.

(2)

298 L . E . P A Y N E A N D H . F . W E I N B E R G E R

and

a 1 (r) = ~ sup 1

~atJxtx t,

(5)

r I x l = r ~,t

where Ix[ is the length of the vector x.

We assume t h a t a tj approaches the unit m a t r i x in the sense t h a t % a n d a 1 approach 1 as r--> oo.

L e t DR (r) be the Diriehlet integral of u over the annular region between spheres of radii r and R > r. Clearly DR (r) increases with R, and b y (4)

D (r) = lim

DR (r) <~

A (r)/a o (r). (6)

We now write

R R

8(1) r r 8(1)

(7)

where S(1) is the surface of the unit sphere, d ~ its surface element, a n d g r a d a u the projection of the gradient of u on the unit sphere.

3 0 u 2

, grada u,'=r3[, grad u, - (~r) ] 9

(8)

B y Schwarz's and Wirtinger's inequalities / ' ~ u \3

s(1) f d~

R

r S(1) 8(1)

>~(n-2)rn-2f[u(R)-u(r)]2d~+(n-1)f[fu~d~-

s(1) r S(1) S(1)

(9)

where con is the area of S(1). Since b o t h integrals on the right are non-negative, each is separately bounded b y

Dn(r)

and hence uniformly in R b y

D(r).

B y consid- ering the first integral for r sufficiently large and R > r , we see t h a t

u(r)considered

as a function on the unit sphere converges in the m e a n square sense as r-->oo. This implies t h a t the limit of

f u(r)d~

exists. B y adding a suitable constant to u, we

8(1)

m a y m a k e this limit zero. We suppose this to have been done.

(3)

NOTE ON A LEMMA OF FINN AND GILBARG

299

T h e second integral on t h e right of (9) m u s t converge, a n d hence its i n t e g r a n d m u s t a p p r o a c h zero. T h u s we find

lim

f u2(R)d~=O.

(10)

R - ~ S(1)

Neglecting the second term in (9) and letting R-->c~ shows that

D(r))(n_2)r._ 2 f u2(r)da=

(n=2)r

f u'dS,

(11)

S(1) S(r)

where S(r) is the surface of the sphere of radius r.

I t is easily seen f r o m S c h w a r z ' s inequality t o g e t h e r with (10) a n d t h e Dirichlet integrability of u t h a t

lim

(~ ua~JuivjdS=O.

(12)

R-~Oo J 8( R) Hence, using S c h w a r z ' s inequality

, , O A (r)

[A(r)]2=[ f ua"u.,v, dS] <~al(r) f a"u,uadS f u'dS= -al(r)--a--~- f u~dS.

.~(r) S(r) Zcr)

S(r)

Using (11) and (6) gives

[A (r)]~< -rax(r) OAA(r). (13)

( n - 2) a0 (r) ~ r This m e a n s t h a t for r > r o

r

j e a - h ~ ) ~0 9 (14)

ro

W e a k e n i n g this inequality, we find

.ao(Q)~

A (r) ~< A (ro) ~>,. t~,(~)~.

& g

If' we assume t h a t

ao(~)/ax(s

as Q - + c ~ , t h e e x p o n e n t in (15) is arbitrarily close t o n - 2 for sufficiently large r o.

I n general, (14) can also be w r i t t e n in t h e f o r m

/r ~--2

r

A(r)<A(ro) t: ) exp{(n--2)f(1--ao/ax)de/e} 06)

T$

which clearly displays the effect of the deviation of ao/a 1 from one.

R e f e r e n c e

[1]. R. FINN & D. GILBARG, Three-dimensional subsonic flows, and asymptotic estimates for elliptic partial differential equations.

Acta Math.,

98 (1957), 265--296.

Références

Documents relatifs

The main results given in the third section of this paper concern the exponential stability of the solution satisfying R.H.-J.E... The conclusions of Lemma

On a Liouville phenomenon for entire weak supersolutions of elliptic partial differential equations.. Autour d’un phénomène de Liouville pour les sursolutions entières

The class of operators considered in our study is a non-linear gene- ralization of a bounded self-adjoint operator, namely the class of abstract variational

In this paper, we focus on the first and last of these three points. In [6], a GLS method with continuous, piecewise linear finite elements was proposed for solving a three

Equation (3) is of el- liptic type if all eigenvalues are positive, parabolic if at least one eigenvalue vanishes, otherwise hyperbolic.. Further restrictions on

The interpretation attached by the two authors to the geometrical concepts involved is, however, different, and, in consequence the theorem of ROS~XTHAL is

The continuity and monotonicity of mappings of finite distortion are studied in [5], where the authors prove continuity under the additional assumption that the

Recently the close connection between regularity properties of weak solutions of quasilinear elliptic systems of partial differential equations and Liouville-type