C AHIERS DE
TOPOLOGIE ET GÉOMÉTRIE DIFFÉRENTIELLE CATÉGORIQUES
M ARIA C RISTINA P EDICCHIO F ABIO R OSSI
Monoidal closed structures for topological spaces : counter-example to a question of Booth and Tillotson
Cahiers de topologie et géométrie différentielle catégoriques, tome 24, n
o4 (1983), p. 371-376
<
http://www.numdam.org/item?id=CTGDC_1983__24_4_371_0>
© Andrée C. Ehresmann et les auteurs, 1983, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Cahiers de topologie et géométrie différentielle catégoriques » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (
http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
MONOIDAL CLOSED STRUCTURES FOR TOPOLOGICAL SPACES:
COUNTER-EXAMPLE TO A QUESTION OF BOOTH AND TILLOTSON by
Maria Cristina PEDICCHIO and Fabio ROSSI *CAHIERS DE TOPOLOGIE ET
GÉOMÉTRIE DIFFÉRENTIELLE
Vol. XXI V - 4
(1983 )
INTRODUCTION.
In recent years, the
problem
ofstudying
monoidal clo sed struct-ures
[2]
on the categoryTop
oftopological
spaces and continuous maps has interested many authors(see,
forinstance, Wyler [6],
Wilker[5] ,
,Greve
[3],
and Booth & Tillotson[1]).
Inparticular,
the method of Booth& Tillotson is to
topologize, by
anarbitrary class d
of spaces, both theset of continuous maps and the
set-product
oftopological
spaces(A-open
topology
andd.product, respectively).
IfA
satisfies suitableconditions,
then the
d-open topology
and the8-product
are relatedby
anexponential
law and determine a monoidal closed structure on
Top ([I],
Theorem2.6,
page42).
In the list of their
examples,
the authorsstudy
the case,important
for
sequential
spaces,of A = {N,oo},
whereN 00
is theone-point
compact- ification of the discrete space N of natural numbers. This class does notsatisfy
thehypothesis
of Theorem 2.6 of[I.].
One
question they
raise is to determine whether this8-structure
ismonoidal closed on
Top ([1],
Section6 (i),
page46).
The aim of our note is to answer this
question negatively, proving, by
anexample,
that the considered structure is not monoidal closed.To obtain this result we will use some
properties,
due to Isbell[4],
that we recall in Section 1.1. NOTATION. X,
Y,
Z willalways
denotetopological
spaces andhom ( X , Y )
will indicate the set of all continuous functions(maps)
fromX to Y. 1 will stand for a
singleton
space, and 2 for aSierpinski
space, i. e. a spaceconsisting
of twopoints
0 , 1 with0, {1}, {0, 7 !
as its372 open sets.
Let us first summarize some notions and results stated in
[1]
and[4] .
Lest 8
be anarbitrary
class oftopological
spaces.DEFINITION I. 1
[1].
If A EA, f :
A - Y is a map and U is an open set inZ,
thenW ( f , U )
will denote thefollowing
subset ofhorn (
Y,Z ) :
By requiring
thefamily
of all these sets to be an opensubbase,
we intro-duce a
topology
onhom ( Y, Z ,
called theQ-open topology.
The
corresponding function
space will be denotedby M A ( Y, Z ) ; M A( - , - )
is a bifunctor fromTo pop X Top
toTop .
DEFINITION 1.2
[1].
We define the(f-product X X A
Y of X and Y asthe set X X Y with the final
topology
with respect to allincoming
maps of the forms :It is easy to see that - x
(t -
is a bifunctor fromTop
XTop
toTop.
DEFINITION 1.3
[1].
Theclass 3
of spaces will be said to be aregular
class if for each
AE A
everypoint
of A has a fundamental system ofneighborhoods
which are closed in A and areepimorphic images
of spaces in(i .
PROPOSITION 1.4
[1]. I f A is a regular
classof compact spaces,
thenthere i s
anadjunction
Furthermore the
exponential
lawis a continuous
bijection.
DEFINITION 1.5
[41. A topology
on the setOp
Y of open sets of atop-
ological
space Y is atopological topology
iff it makes finite intersection andarbitrary
union continuousoperations.
PROPOSITION
1.6 (4]. If
F and G areadjoint endofunctors of Top
F -
G, thenG (2)=
Y* is atopological topology
onthe
setOp
Y, whereY = F(1).
Conversely, if
Y is anarbitrary space
and Y* is atopological lap- ology
onOp Y,
then there is(up
toisomorphism) precisely
onepair of
ad-joint endofunctors
F-l
G:Top - Top
such thatF(1) =
Y andG(2)
= Y*.Moreover G
( Z)
is hom(
Y’,Z ) with the initial topology with respect
to all thefunctions of the form
where
BU(f)
=f- 1 (U) for
eachf E hom ( Y, Z) .
Now,
we are able to prove thefollowing proposition,
PROPOSITION 1. 7.
If A
is aregular
classof compact spaces,
thena)
For any Y cTop , M(i( Y, 2)
is atopological topology
Y* onOp
Y.b) Mél( Y, Z)
is the sethom ( Y, Z) with the initial topology with
respect to all
the functions
where BU(f)
=f -1(U), f
Ehom(Y, Z).
c) Let
Wo ={Ua}
be afamily o f open
setsof Z
andlet Y, Z >
W0denote
the initial topology
onHom (
Y,Z) with respect
to allthe functions Xua’ Ua E
W 0(see b). 1 f W
isthe
seto f
allfinite intersec tions of Ua
and W2 is the set o f
all arbitrary
unions o f Va,
then the initial topologies
coincide.
d)
Wetopologize
the setOp (
X X(f Y), the subbasic open
setsbeing
all
the
setsof the form
374
We denote
this topology by
For any X , Y ETop ,
we have1 f
theclass (i
determines a monoidalclosed
structure onTop, then,
ne-cessarily
PROOF. a and b follow from
1.4
and1.6.
c)
It is obvious thatConversely,
let U EW2 ,
then . It follows thatis
commutative,
whereA
is the canonicaldiagonal
map and «1» theidentity
function of hom(Y,Z).
Since Y* is a
topological topology,
the unionoperation
U iscontinuous,
then B U. « 1»
is also continuous for eachU E W2 .
Itfollows,
from th euniversal property of initial
topology,
that «1>> is continuous.A similar
proof applies
to thefamily W1 .
d)
From 1.3 theexponential law
is a continuousbijection
From b and c,
M (t( X, Y*)
has the initialtopology
with respect to allthe maps
where V is a subbasic open set of Y*. It is easy to see that
M (1( X, Y*)
and
X X AY>
arehomeomorphic.
We obtain the thesis from thefollowing
commutative
diagram :
2. Let
d
be the class whoseonly
element isN 00’
theone-point
compact-ification of the discrete space N of natural numbers.
In this section we shall prove that the
d-open topology
and the8- product
do not determine a monoidal closed structure onTop ;
thisgives
a
negative
answer to thequestion posed by
Booth and Tillotson in[1 ,
Section
6, Example ( i )
page46.
Clearly,
for 1.7 d it suffices to find two spaces X and Y such thatI
Let X = Y =
Noo,
it is easy to see thatN,
x(i N. = N 00 x N 00 ’
wherex is the
topological product.
From the definition of theA-open topology,
the open sets of
(Noo
xNoo)
* aregenerated by
the sets of the formwhere s is any continuous map
Noo - Noo x Noo’
with comp onents r, t:Noo- Noo.
For 1.7 d the subbasic open sets ofNoo x Noo>
are all the setsof the form
where
r , t E hom ( Noo, Noo) .
Th eone-point
set isclearly
ever, it is not open in
( Noo x Noo )*,
for every non-empty open set in(Noo x Noo)*
contains elements other thanN DO x N 00.
To seethis,
cons-ider a basic open set
Choose m E N
such that eachri (oo)
for1 i b
is either m or is 00.376 Th en each
has
only
a finite number ofpoints
in common with{m} J x N 00 .
So there issome n E N such that
( m , n )
lies in nosi ( Noo) .
Thus the open set Icontains
N.)Q
xNoo
/I (m, n )} .
Thiscompletes
theproof.
0Since the
li-structure,
forA = {Noo},
is not monoidal closed it fol-lows that the
d-product
is not associative and0-1
is notcontinuous;
fur-ther, M A (
Y,Z) ( cs-open topology
=convergent sequence-open topology)
is
generally
different fromMCHC ( Y, Z ) ([1],
Section8, Example (VII),
page 50 and Section 9
( i )
page52).
The authors would like to thank Max
Kelly
for theimprovements suggested
to the first version of the paper.REFERENCES.
1. P. BOOTH & J.
TILLOTSON,
Monoidalclosed,
cartesian closed and conven-ient
categories
oftopological
spaces,Pacific
J. Math. 88 ( 1980), 35 - 5 3.2. S. EILENBERG & G. M. KELLY, Closed
categories,
Proc.Conf.
onCategorical Algebra (La Jolla, 1965 ), Springer 1966,
421- 562.3. G. GREVE, How many monoidal closed structures are there in
Top :
Arch.Math. 34, Basel ( 1980 ), 538-539.
4.
J.
R.ISBELL,
Function spaces andadjoints,
Math. Scand. 36 (1975 ), 317-339.5. P. WILKER,
Adjoint product
and hom functors ingeneral topology, Pacific
J.Math. 34 (1970), 269- 283.
6. O. WYLER, Convenient
categories
fortopology,
Gen.Top.
andAppl.
3(1973),
225-242.
Istituto di Mate mati ca Universita di Trieste Piazzale Europa 1 34100 TRIESTE. IT AL IE