• Aucun résultat trouvé

Many analytical methods rely on equilibrium systems in aqueous solution. This unit will review General concepts of aqueous solutions Chemical equilibrium Equilibrium calculations Deviations from ideal behavior

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Many analytical methods rely on equilibrium systems in aqueous solution. This unit will review General concepts of aqueous solutions Chemical equilibrium Equilibrium calculations Deviations from ideal behavior"

Copied!
11
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Many analytical methods rely on equilibrium systems in aqueous solution.

This unit will review

General concepts of aqueous solutions Chemical equilibrium

Equilibrium calculations Deviations from ideal behavior

(2)

acid base conjugate

base of HF conjugate

acid of H2O base acid conjugate

base conjugate

acid

acid strength base strength

For the general chemical reaction:

aA + bB cC + dD If A and B are brought together:

There is an initial reduction in the concentrations of A and B.

Both C and D will increase in concentration.

We reach a point where the concentrations no longer change.

A B

C D

time

kinetic equilibrium region region

(3)

These are dynamic equilibria

At equilibrium, the forward and reverse rates of reaction are equal.

Any given species is constantly changing from one form to another.

Changes in the system will alter the rates and a new equilibrium will be achieved.

Equilibrium concentrations are based on:

The specific equilibrium The starting concentrations Other factors such as:

Temperature Pressure

Reaction specific conditions Altering conditions will stress a system,

resulting in an equilibrium shift.

Keq = aCc aDd

aAa aBb a = activity

Keq = [ C ]c [ D ]d [ A ]a [ B ]b

(4)

We’ll be using molar concentrations when working with chemical equilibrium.

This introduces errors that you should be aware of.

While we will not work with activities, we need to know what they are.

( )

Except for dilute systems, the effective

concentration of ions is usually less than the actual concentration.

The term activity is used to denote this effective concentration.

activity ai = fi [ i ] where

fi is the activity coefficient for i [ i ] is the molar concentration

(5)

0.5 Zi2 µ ! 1 + 0.33 "iµ!

For very dilute solutions As fi -> 1, ai -> [ i ] For µ up to 0.1

fi < 1 and ai < [ i ] When u is > 0.1

Results in complicated behavior.

In general, if µ < 0.01, we can safely use molar concentrations.

Keq = [ H3O+ ] [ OH- ] [ H2O ]2

In dilute solutions, [ H3O+] and [ OH- ] is much smaller than [ H2O ]. [ H2O ] is essentially a constant of

~

55.5 M.

(6)

K

W

= 10

-14

= [H

3

O

+

] [OH

-

]

[H

3

O

+

] = [H

3

O

+

]

water

+ [H

3

O

+

]

HCl

[OH

-

] = [H

3

O

+

]

water

Lets set x = [H

3

O

+

]

water

then [H

3

O

+

] = x + 1.0 x 10

-8

[OH

-

] = x

10-14

= (x + 1.0 x 10

-8

) ( x)

Our equation can be rearranged as x2 + 10-8 x - 10-14 = 0

This quadratic expression can be solved by:

x =

Only the positive root is meaningful in equilibrium problems.

-b + b2 - 4ac 2a

x = -10-8 + [ (10-8)2 + 4x10-14]1/2 / 2 = 1.9 x 10-7 M

pH = 6.72

So adding a small amount of HCl to water DOES make it acidic.

While this approach is more time

consuming, you’ll find it very useful as our problems get more complex.

(7)

KSP expressions are used for ionic materials that are not completely soluble in water.

Their only means of dissolving is by dissociation.

AgCl(s) Ag+(aq) + Cl-(aq)

Keq = [ Ag+(aq) ] [ Cl-(aq) ] [ AgCl(s) ]

At equilibrium, our system is a saturated solution of silver and chloride ions.

The only way to know that it is saturated it to observe some AgCl at the bottom of the solution.

As such, AgCl is a constant and KSP expressions do not include the solid form in the equilibrium expression

Determine the solubility of AgCl in water at 20oC in grams / 100 ml.

KSP = [Ag+] [Cl-] = 1.0 x 10-10 At equilibrium, [Ag+] = [Cl-] so

1.0 x 10-10 = [Ag+]2 [Ag+] = 10-5 M

g AgCl = 10-5 mol/l * 0.1 l * 143.32 g/mol Solubility = 1.43x10-4 g / 100 ml

KSP = 1.1 x 10-12 = [ Ag+ ]2 [ CrO42- ] [CrO42-] = [CrO42-]Ag2CrO4 + [CrO42-]Na2CrO4

With such a small value for KSP, we can assume that is [CrO42-]Ag2CrO4 negligible.

If we’re wrong, our silver concentration will be significant (>1% of the chromate concentration.) Then you’d use the quadratic approach.

KSP = 1.1 x 10-12 = [ Ag+ ]2 [ CrO42- ] [CrO42-] = 0.010 M

[ Ag+ ] = ( KSP / [ CrO42- ] ) 1/2 = 1.1 x 10-12 / 0.010 M = 1.1 x 10-5 M [ Ag+ ] << [ CrO42- ]

so our assumption was valid.

(8)

[H3O+] [A-] [HA]

[OH-] [BH+] [B]

Water is not included in the

expressions because it is a

constant

[ H3O+ ] [ A- ] [ HA ]

Since both a H3O+ and a A- is produced for each HA that dissociates:

[ H3O+ ] = [ A- ]

[ HA ] = 0.1 M - [ H3O+ ] Lets set X = [ H3O+ ]

KA = = 2.24 x 10-5 KA = 2.24 x 10-5 = X2 / (0.1 - X) Rearranging give us:

X2 + 2.24x10-5X - 2.24x10-6 = 0 We can solve this quadratic or possibly

assume that the amount of acid that dissociates is insignificant (compared to the undissociated form)

KA = 2.24 x 10-5 [ H3O+ ] = [ A- ] [ HA ] = 0.1 M - [ H3O+ ]

KA / 0.1 < 10-3 - can assume that [HA] = 0.1 M 2.24x10-5 = X2 / 0.1M

X = (2.24x10-6)1/2 = 0.00150 pH = 2.82

(9)

Now, lets go for the exact solution Earlier, we found that

X2 + 2.24x10-5X - 2.24x10-6 = 0

X = -b + b2 - 4ac 2a

X = 0.00149 pH = 2.82

No significant difference between our two answers.

X = -2.24x10-5 + [(2.24x10-5)2 +4x2.24x10-6]1/2 2

If you are starting with an acid, acidic conditions or the conjugate acid of a base

Do your calculations using KA

If starting with a base, basic conditions or the conjugate base of an acid

Do your calculations using KB

You can readily convert pH to pOH and KA to KB values.

With complex formation, two or more species will join, forming a single, new species.

Mn+ + xL M(L)xn+

KF = [ M(L)xn+ ] [ Mn+ ] [ L ]m

If we are evaluating the decomposition of a complex, we can use a K decomposition.

M(L)xn+ Mn+ + xL KD =

Since water is not a portion of these equilibria, KD = 1 / KF

[ Mn+ ] [ L ]m [ M(L)xn+ ]

(10)

Equilibrium expressions for REDOX systems are derived from standard electrode potentials.

6Fe2+ + Cr2O72- + 14 H3O+ 6Fe3+ + 2Cr3+ + 21H2O

KREDOX =

We’ll review how to determine and work with KREDOX when we cover the units on

electrochemistry.

[Fe3+]6 [Cr3+]2 [Fe2+]6 [Cr2O72-][H3O+]14

KA3 KA2

KA1

[H3O+] [PO43-] [HPO42-] KA3 =

[H3O+] [HPO42-] [H2PO4-] KA2 =

[H3O+] [H2PO4-] [H3PO4]

KA1 = Note:

[H3O+] is the same for each expression.

The relative amounts of each species can be found if the pH is known.

The actual amounts can be found if pH and total H3PO4 is known.

One possible ‘first step’ would be to determine the relative amounts of each species.

[H2PO4-] [H3PO4] KA1

[H3O+]

KA3 [H3O+]

[PO43-] [HPO42-] KA2

[H3O+]

[HPO42-] [H2PO4-]

=

=

=

(11)

[H2PO4-] [H3PO4] 7.5 x 10-2

10-7

4.8 x 10-13 10-7

[PO43-] [HPO42-] 6.2 x 10-8

10-7

[HPO42-] [H2PO4-]

=

=

=

=

=

= 750000 0.62

4.8x10-6

These ratios show that only H2PO4- and HPO42- are present at significant levels at pH 7.

Total phosphate = 1.0 M so

1.0 = [H3PO4] + [H2PO4-] + [HPO42-] + [PO43-] This is referred to as a mass balance.

Based on the ratio, we know that [H3PO4] and [PO43-] are not present at significant levels for this mass balance so:

1.0 = [H2PO4-] + [HPO42-]

[HPO42-] = 0.62 [H2PO4-]

1.0 = [H2PO4-] + 0.62 [H2PO4-] = 1.62 [H2PO4-]

[H2PO4-] = 1.0 / 1.62 = 0.617 M [HPO42-]

[H2PO4-] = 0.62 Since you now know the concentration of H2PO4-, you can now sequentially solve the other equilibrium expressions.

This approach is very useful when dealing with complex equilibria.

The mass balance is on means of eliminating

‘insignificant’ species based on addition or subtraction

Références

Documents relatifs

Since, as in the case of the Nash equilibrium the proofs of existence of the equilibrium in choice lean on fixed point theory for correspondences, let us first recall some

We obtain optimal consumption, optimal hours and the risk premium as functions of financial wealth in the neoclassical production economy, while our closed-form solutions can be used

7: (Color online) Comparison of the fragment charge distribution (left three columns) and the average excitation energy of fragments (rightmost column) of the reaction ensemble at

Detailed characterization of non equilibrium steady states (NESS) for reaction diffusion systems. Discussion of stationary probabilities and |K | as a distance

En fait, l’L-arginine est un substrat de l’eNOS (endothelial nitric oxide synthase), enzyme essentielle pour la production d’oxyde nitrique [98], dont l’activité

To keep the computation time within realistic limits, two approximations are then used to compute the Zn β -factors: (i) only 20 snapshots from the FPMD trajectories are considered,

In our frame- work, a locally consistent equilibrium is such that each type 1 …rm is able to correctly perceive the slopes of the reaction functions of both type 2

Deux des résultats obtenus sont pratiquement égaux quelles que soient la température et la pression, il s'agit des temps chimiques les plus petits que nous désignerons par τ 1 et