• Aucun résultat trouvé

CCMC News: Fall 1992, Issue No. 3

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "CCMC News: Fall 1992, Issue No. 3"

Copied!
5
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:

Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à [email protected].

Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at

[email protected]. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

CCMC News, 1992

READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright

NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC :

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=2bc77edc-f679-4945-ab85-5552d09666e3

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=2bc77edc-f679-4945-ab85-5552d09666e3

NRC Publications Archive

Archives des publications du CNRC

For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.

https://doi.org/10.4224/40001912

Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at

CCMC News: Fall 1992, Issue No. 3

(2)

c

1

4

-1,

5-

()6T

PY-4-er

MC

CMC

JA

N

8

7993

Fall

1992

A

publication

of

NRC's Institute for Research

in

Construction

Issue

No.

3

CCMC

...

NEWS

...

Once the ABC 1995

is proclaimed, innovative products in Alberta will be accepted only through CCMC evaluation.

The Canadian window

standard is a

quintessential example

of a standard refined through developments

and improvements.

Alberta Supports

CCMC

Evaluations

New and innovative building products in Alberta are now evaluated by the Canadian Contruction Materials Centre (CCMC)

-

Canada's national evaluation service for building products. The province

began directing proponents to CCMC on June 1, 1992.

Previously, new and innovative products with no appro- priate standard referenced in the Alberta Building Code (ABC) were accepted in Alberta through a Product List-

ing system. Through an agreement with the province's Safety Standards Branch, CCMC will issue evaluation reports based on the ABC. CCMC will also provide proponents with the opportunity to have products evaluated to the National Building Code of Canada or

other provincial codes. During an initial transition phase, Alberta Product Listings issued pursuant to the ABC 1990 will remain in effect until the ABC 1995 is

proclaimed. From that point on, these products will be

accepted only through a CCMC evaluation.

CCMC eliminates the need for manufacturers to have

their products evaluated separately in each provincial and municipal jurisdiction in Canada. CCMC evaluation

reports are recognized nationally by regulatory agencies throughout the country and, in increasing numbers, by

architects and specifiers, who must have confidence in

the products they specify.

Alberta Liaison Officer

at CCMC

CCMC has assigned Mr. Ron Waters, an Evaluation Officer, to help Alberta building officials switch from the provincial Standata system to CCMC's system of

listings and evaluation reports. Mr. Waters attended the semi -annual meeting of the Alberta Building Officials in September to discuss CCMC's history and provide a detailed explanation of the Centre's services. Alberta building officials with questions or

comments are urged to contact Mr. Waters at tel.

(613) 993 -6602, fax. (613) 952 -0268.

CCMC was established at NRC's Institute for Research

in Construction in 1988 following extensive consultations with the provinces and territories. Alberta's latest action is consistent with those early

negotiations and a Memorandum of Understanding signed by the provinces in an attempt to reduce duplicate services in Canada. Only Ontario still

maintains a separate provincial evaluation service for innovative building products, although revisions to the Building Code Act in Ontario are expected to enhance CCMC's recognition early in the new year.

Information: Alphonse Caouette

Evolution of

a

Window

Standard

CCMC evaluates windows to standard CSA A440 -M90, Windows, published in 1990 by the Canadian Standards Association and

referenced in the 1990 National Building Code (NBC). The A440 standard is an excellent example of how

standards evolve and improve.

Prior to the establishment of CCMC, windows were evaluated by Canada Mortgage and Housing

Corporation (CMHC) as part of their in -house review of

product acceptance for CMHC financed construction. At that time, the evaluation of windows involved the review of several standards produced by the Canadian General Standards Board (CGSB) and the Canadian Standards Association (CSA). Requirements within the

(3)

CCMC

N

E

W

S

A product may be

limited to geographical areas with low annual precipitation.

Evolution of a Window Standard.. continued from page I

variety of standards were inconsistent. After some initiative by the evaluations group, the two standard -

writing organizations agreed to produce a single

standard which applied to all types of windows. The proposed standard was performance oriented

-

that is, it required all aspects of design and

performance to be verified through tests, such as the air- and water -tightness and wind -load resistance tests specified in the NBC. CSA A440 -M84, published in

1984, also included less- costly prescriptive

requirements for aspects such as minimum thickness of

window materials. (At that time, strength and durability

of windows depended more on material thickness than

on manufacturing methods.) A transition period allowed manufacturers to have their products evaluated to the

old standards, as well as to the new A440. By 1987, the A440 standard was widely accepted by the manufacturers and testing agencies.

Modifications improved the A440. Some optional tests applying to windows made of specific materials, such

as condensation resistance for thermally broken metal windows, were made voluntary and applicable to all

windows, regardless of their material components. The test to determine what is now called `temperature index' was modified to produce more useful calculations,

Unit

Head:

Alphonse

Caouette

Alphonse Caouette is Unit Head for CCMC's Technical Evaluation Services. This unit supports the construction industry by evaluating and providing information on

building materials, systems and services. Mr. Caouette

is also technical advisor to the Canadian Commission

on Construction Materials Evaluation.

After graduating from Carleton University's Department

of Engineering in 1977, Al became Project Manager of

construction projects in Québec's mining and pulp and paper industries. He joined the newly- created CCMC in

1988 from Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation,

including a table that allows users to determine what relative humidity can be maintained at, for example, a

given 2.5% January Design Temperature. Non -thermally broken metal windows were excluded from the scope of

the A440.

Performance levels were added to the water -tightness and wind -load tests in the 1990 edition of the standard. The test for wind -load resistance was changed to a test for wind -resistance to deflection and blow -out. Lower

pressures required in the new test allow testers to

remove gauges after taking readings (deflection) without risking injury or equipment damage. Testers can stand back safely to subject windows to higher wind pressures (blow -out). In addition, the 1990 NBC requires that windows within two metres of ground level be rated with the optional test for resistance to forced entry.

The 1990 standard comes with a Users' Guide designed

to help specifiers establish performance levels for windows in specific buildings at given locations. More specifically, the Guide helps users select appropriate optional requirements in the standard, determine the suitability of products for specific applications and geo- graphic locations in Canada, and know the background and intent of the standard's tests and requirements. Information: G. Franche

+

where he was Senior Materials Evaluation Engineer in residential construction.

Mr. Caouette, a registered

professional engineer in Ontario and Québec, is a member of the

Canadian Standards Association

(CSA) Steering Committee on Masonry and Forest Products. He also chairs a subcommittee of the CSA standard on Parking Structures.

+

Know the

Limitations

of Product

Use

oth CCMC publications, Listings and Evaluation Reports, have a section dealing with the intended use of the product in a building. As

evaluations are based on verifying the properties re-

quired for the product to perform under the conditions anticipated in its intended use, it is important for build-

ing officials and specifiers alike to ensure that the intended use coincides with the installation under review.

All listings have a section entitled "Appropriate Usage." The text in this section either highlights certain important conditions of the intended use (such as fire considerations) or directs the reader to the Preface, where detailed information is found. The reader may be

referred to another document, such as an installation standard which accompanies the product standard.

O

Similarly, all evaluation reports have a Section 4, enti- tled "Use and Limitations," where important limitations

on use are outlined. Every evaluation involves the inter- pretation of the test results and assessment with res- pect to the acceptance criteria. Should a particular product fall below the acceptance criterion for a physi-

cal or mechanical property, the product may be limited

to uses where that property is not relied upon. This section may highlight NBC requirements which affect the product's use or, for example, may specify that a

certain roofing product is limited to geographical areas with annual precipitation not exceeding 500 mm. Where the limitations or instaliation details are too lengthy, the manufacturer's documents would be referred to.

In all cases, building officials and specifiers should look for the CCMC Evaluation Number and then check the Report or Listing to ensure that the product is being used in a manner consistent with its evaluation.

+

CCMC

N E

W

S

CCMC is being asked

to cease its window listing service once an industry-run certification program

is successfully implemented.

Spray -in -place foam insulations are

essentially manufactured on site;

third -party follow -up

provides quality control.

Recent Events

in

Window Evaluation

The number of agencies relying on CCMC's evaluation service for windows is increasing steadily. Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, a long- standing user and supporter of the

system, was recently joined by Public Works Canada. Other agencies which use the service now include the Saskatchewan Ministry of Housing, Ontario Hydro and Hydro Québec.

Currently, window manufacturers apply to CCMC to

have their products evaluated. CCMC charges evaluation and listing fees and sends the manufacturer

an Evaluation Directive explaining the evaluation process and listing the documentation and sampling procedure required. The evaluation officer verifies the test report, from a recognized laboratory, that all

performance requirements have been met, including tests for air- and water -tightness, and wind -load resistance, as well as other tests, such as ease of

operation, blocked operation, sash strength and

stiffness. The evaluation officer then verifies the prescriptive requirements for aspects such as minimum material thickness and glazing method, information on

vinyl weathering, wood perservative, and enamel coating.

Once a window has been assigned a CCMC number, specifiers and regulators still must ensure that the window is suitable for its intended use in high -rise or

low -rise construction. as outlined in the Preface of

CCMC's volume of window and door listings. Recent events may change the present evaluation process. The Canadian Window and Door Manufacturers' Association (CWDMA) has just endorsed the creation of a voluntary industry-run certification program. CCMC has been participating in

discussions leading up to this decision, taken on

November 4, 1992, at the Fall meeting of the CWDMA. The Centre is being asked to cease its window listing service once the industry-run certification program is

successfully implemented. CCMC plans to consult with key user groups such as the Provincial/Territorial Committee on Building Standards, as well as with its

existing clients of evaluated products, to determine how best to proceed. CCMC News will report on the progress of this initiative and how the conformity assessment procedure for windows in Canada is

evolving.

Information: G. Franche +

Spray

-in -Place Foam

Insulation

The growing demand for tightly- constructed, energy -conserving buildings has increased the number of spray foam insulations in the marketplace. These products that are sprayed on site are most effective in covering different substrates within wall assemblies. After some stagnant years in the early

eighties, the spray foam industry is undergoing a

resurgence in building construction. Due to this resurgence, CCMC has updated its Technical Guide for the evaluation of spray -in -place foam insulations. The technical requirements were developed after CCMC found that no standards existed for the first spray -in -place foam insulation product evaluated by the Centre in the late 1980's. The product

-a

semi -flexible modified isocyanurate

-

is a creamy yellow substance for spraying into cavities of stud walls, floors over unheated garages and between perimeter joist spaces. The cells of modified isocyanurate expand when cured, producing a density of 8 kg /m3 with a thermal

resistance of 0.615 RSI /25 mm.

Spray -in -place polyurethane products evaluated and available in today's market are predominately a closed - cell plastic material ranging in density from 30 to 50

kg /m3. As a suitable accelerated test protocol for

evaluating long -term aging effects has yet to be established, CCMC limits the published design thermal resistance for this group of products to 1.05 RSI /25

mm. This value could be increased if thermal testing is

conducted on five -year aged specimens.

Spray -in -place polyurethanes have recently returned to

CCMC for evaluation thanks to positive results with the control of off -gassing. The polyurethane

manufacturers, through the auspices of the Society of

the Plastics Industry, subjected their products to

emissions testing and toxicological review, which took several years to complete. The criteria often used to

evaluate emissions from building materials is 1/100 of the Threshold Limit Values (TLV's) set for chemical and physical agents. The industry- sponsored testing showed that a typical polyurethane foam insulation,

which is sprayed in walls, had a volatile organic compound (VOC) emission concentration below the TLV /100 criteria.

Provisional Reports

In June 1992, CCMC issued provisional reports for two spray -in -place polyurethane products. These products

continued on page -? 1

(4)

C C M C

N

E

W

S

Spra -in -Place Foam Insulation... continued from page 3

met the existing product standard CGSB 51 -GP-

23M1978, plus additional CCMC emissions criteria. The provisional status has been assigned because the manufacturers of these two products have been requested to re- submit their products for testing in

accordance with the draft standard, CGSB 51.23M92 for Spray -in -Place Polyurethane. There is confidence based on the evidence submitted that these products

will meet the revised requirements.

The revisions to the standard include the presentation

of emissions data in two ways. Procedure A, for products where occupancy is expected thirty days hence (new buildings), requires presentation of the

VOC concentrations on Day 30 of the test. Procedure

B, for building additions, establishes when VOC

concentrations no longer exceed the TLV /100 criteria, thus, how many days until occupancy can take place.

Quality Assurance

As spray -in -place foam insulations are essentially manufactured on site, CCMC requires that proponents

of such systems ensure that the on -site product equals

or surpasses the quality of samples evaluated. The method of quality assurance will be described in

CCMC's evaluation report. Manufacturers of these systems deliver the product on site through licensed

IRC

Announces

New

European

Publications Catalogue

The Institute for Research in Construction is pleased to

announce the availability of its revised European Publications Catalogue. The catalogue contains selected listings of construction -related publications issued by seven organizations in Europe, such as the Building Research Establishment and the Swedish Council for Building Research. These publications can

be ordered directly from IRC, a service the Institute offers in its role as a comprehensive source of con- struction technology from Canada and around the world.

If you would like to receive a free copy of the European Publications Catalogue, please write to: Client Services, Institute for Research in Construction, National

Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario,

K1A OR6. Telephone: (613) 993 -2463.

Fax: (613) 952 -7673. +

LIBRARY AND ARCHIVES CANADA

Biblio hè ue et Archives Canada

3

3286 55547154

5

installers and provide for a third -party follow -up service. Quality assurance services used by some

manufacturers include Warnock Hersey Professional Services, the Canadian Urethane Foam Contractors' Association and the Canadian General Standards Board.

Building officials and specifiers must ensure that installers are qualified by the manufacturer. CCMC and manufacturers' instructions require that qualified installers apply the product according to installation

standard CGSB 51- GP- 39M1979 (or CGSB 51.39M92). This standard, which accompanies the product

standard, instructs the installer to verify that substrate preparation and conditions such as temperature and

wind are appropriate; check for density and verify cohesion and adhesion of the product to the substrate through tests in- situ; and follow spraying procedure and

criteria set for distance limits from heat -emitting devices and cover of electrical wiring.

The CCMC evaluation report highlights the main areas

of concern for a particular system; however, the

installation manual should be available for reference on site.

Information: B. Di Lenardo

1

+1

National Research Council Canada Conseil national de recherches Canada

CCMC

News

is a quarterly publication of the

National Research Council of Canada and is

produced by the Canadian Construction Materials Centre of the Institute for Research in

Construction. Enquiries or comments should be

addressed to Mr. Bruno Di Lenardo, CCMC News, Institute for Research in Construction,

National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A OR6. (613) 993 -7769,

Facsimile (613) 952 -0268

Canadá.

ISSN 0848 -600X

(5)

It'

Library

and

Archives

Canada

395

Wellington Street

Ottawa,

ON K1 A ON4

Bibliothèque

et

Archives

Canada

395, rue

Wellington

Ottawa,

ON K 1 A O N4

For

material

still

subject

to

legislative, contractual

or

institutional obligations, users warrant that they

will

respect those obligations

and not use LAC

collections

in a

manner that would infringe

the rights of others.

Liability that may arise

in

the

use of a

copy

is

assumed

in full by the user. LAC

accepts

no

responsibility

for

unauthorized

use

of collection material

by

users.

To ensure proper citation

and to

facilitate relocation

of an item, the

source

of the material and its

reference

number should always accompany

the copy.

Pour les

documents faisant encore l'objet d'obligations législatives, contractuelles

ou

institutionnelles,

les

usagers

s'engagent

à

respecter ces obligations

et à ne

pas

utiliser

les

documents des collections

de BAC de

façon

à nuire aux

droits d'autrui.

Ils

doivent assumer entièrement toute responsabilité

qui

pourrait

découler

de

l'utilisation d'une reproduction

de

document.

BAC

décline toute responsabilité quant

à

l'utilisation

non

autorisée

de

documents provenant

de ses

collections.

Afin

de

citer

un

document avec exactitude

et

d'en

faciliter

le

repérage,

sa

source

et son

numéro

de

référence doivent toujours accompagner

la

reproduction.

TITLE/TITRE

:

CCMC

News

by

Canadian

Construction

Materials Centre.,

National

Research

Council

Canada.

no.3(1992:

Autumn)

FILE

/DOSSIER

:

REFERENCE NUMBER

/

NUMÉRO

DE

RÉFÉRENCE:

ISSN :1188

-0783,

OCLC Number:

1081344498

PAGE(S)

: 3

Références

Documents relatifs

The table reports, for the entire sample and different subsamples of sent resumes, the call-back rates for applicants with. a White sounding name (column 1) and an African

Let us consider a Monte-Carlo transport process satisfying to hypotheses 1 and 2 with total interaction length λ > 0 and continuous energy loss B, both in units of column

Routing algorithms that consider real-time information of road congestion, street blockages and social media data to decide the better routes to use to maximize

131 Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Prague, Czech Republic 132 State Research Center Institute for High Energy Physics (Protvino), NRC KI, Russia 133

To determine rates of degradation of the Arc- Gcn4-ssrA substrate, we preincubated donor-labeled and ac- ceptor-labeled protein for 16 h at 30 °C to allow spontaneous formation of

Because differential genotype errors manifest themselves as different allele frequency distributions between cases and controls, all of the variables that impact the power of a

[25]; the systematic uncertainties associated with the branching fractions, mass fits, event selection and binning are assumed to be completely correlated; and all other

131 Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Prague, Czech Republic 132 State Research Center Institute for High Energy Physics (Protvino), NRC KI, Russia 133