• Aucun résultat trouvé

Randomized trials are the real hope for Covid-19 treatment

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Randomized trials are the real hope for Covid-19 treatment"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02555217

https://hal.univ-lille.fr/hal-02555217

Preprint submitted on 27 Apr 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Randomized trials are the real hope for Covid-19

treatment

Dominique Deplanque

To cite this version:

Dominique Deplanque. Randomized trials are the real hope for Covid-19 treatment. 2020. �hal-02555217�

(2)

Randomized trials are the real hope for Covid-19 treatment

Facing the frightening Covid-19 pandemic, temptation to use unproven medications is great. Nevertheless, whatever the emergency, it is critical to develop relevant scientific approaches, namely through randomized trials. Surprisingly and unusually, the New England Journal of

Medicine published data from a compassionate

use of remdesivir for patients with severe Covid-19.1 From a medical point of view, it is understandable to attempt to provide a possibly effective treatment in severely ill individuals but organizing the systematic dispensation of experimental treatment outside a well-designed protocol is more disputable.

The scientific and medical relevance of single-arm studies are limited and we will not list here all methodological limitations that the interpretation of such studies is faced. In the “study” cited above, it seems that the inclusion process was in part managed by the drug provider with unclear criteria. Given the world-wide distribution of patients, not considering the heterogeneity of medical practices is also an important bias. Highlighting the reduction of mortality on the basis of a debatable external comparison also raises question while the right choice of such comparator is probably the only way to provide results' credibility.2 While present data are important to consider when developing new hypotheses, their wide dissemination may contribute to confusion among the general public, as was recently the case from similar studies with hydroxychloroquine. Thus, the present data mainly provide a signal for a hypothetic remdesivir repurposing rather than to demonstrate its benefit for the treatment of Covid-19 patients. The real hope for Covid-19 treatment is elsewhere. Despite the epidemic situation, a real control group remains crucial. One concern, is whether it is ethical or not to give patients a placebo. Because the disease is not 100% lethal, it remains ethical to conduct randomized studies using placebo arm.3 From the beginning of January 2020, an exponential number of clinical trials have been developed mainly randomized-trials exploring a large variety of drugs or treatment procedures (Figure 1A). Among the top

ten drugs or procedures evaluated, an impressive number of studies concern hydroxychloroquine in various populations. Several trials are also testing a multiplicity of antivirals including remdesivir but more original approaches such as cell therapies are also developed (Figure 1B). Because some of these trials have an adaptive design that may help to early detect a beneficial or deleterious effect of drugs, it is urgent to wait their results before to disseminate data on possible inappropriate use of treatments.

Dominique DEPLANQUE

Professor of medical Pharmacology

Univ. Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, CIC 1403 – Clinical Investigation Center, F-59000 Lille, France

dominique.deplanque@univ-lille.fr

References

1. Grein J et al. Compassionate use of remdesivir for patients with severe covid-19. N Engl J Med 2020 Apr 10. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2007016.

2. Cucherat M et al. From single-arm studies to externally controlled studies. Methodological considerations and guidelines. Therapie 2020 ; 75 : 21-27.

3. Kalil AC. Treating COVID-19—Off-Label Drug Use, Compassionate Use, and Randomized Clinical Trials During Pandemics. JAMA 2020 Mar 24. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4742.

Figure 1. Interventional studies to fight Covid-19 since January 2020

In the Figure 1A, are represented the interventional studies (randomized or not) declared on clinicaltrial.gov from the beginning of January to April 14th 2020. Figure 1B illustrates the

number of randomized trials declared according to the Top 10 drugs used in the same period.

Figure

Figure  1.  Interventional  studies  to  fight  Covid-19  since  January 2020

Références

Documents relatifs

-si nous emportons un sac pour collecter les déchets quand nous allons en piquenique ; -si nous ne laissons aucun déchet dans la

In this paper we present a new three-dimensional distinct element simulation method that can handle non-spherical grains and is able to produce simulation experiments that

Geyer S (2010) Research on social determinants and health: what sorts of data do we need. Int J Public

L’objectif de cette étude était de comparer le coût par année de vie sauvée avec l’utilisation de la protéine C activée chez les patients en sepsis sévère aux soins intensifs

The finding that CL’s visual perception of apparent limb movements is timing-independent emphasizes the importance of each individual’s history of phantom sensations (recall that CL

While two studies showed an increased reduction in the degree of overweight in the parent-only groups compared with parent – child and child-only interventions, the other four

In summary, for the considered scenario, the TMLE group sequential testing procedure described in Section 6.1 reaches a decision more quickly under the (Q, g ⋆ n )-adaptive

definition of the study hypothesis (the comparisons planned in the Methods section), baseline characteristics and outcomes reported per group (details that would allow for