• Aucun résultat trouvé

An agenda for establishing the Ecological Footprint as communication instrument and indicator for sustainable development in small countries: Case study Luxembourg

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "An agenda for establishing the Ecological Footprint as communication instrument and indicator for sustainable development in small countries: Case study Luxembourg"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

!

An agenda for establishing the Ecological Footprint as communication

instrument and indicator for sustainable development in small

countries: Case study Luxembourg

Paula Hild, Bianca Schmitt, Morgane Mey, Enrico Benetto, Colin Jury

Public Research Center Henri Tudor - Resource Centre for Environmental Technologies (CRTE) 66, rue de Luxembourg (BP 144), L-4002 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg

The Ecological Footprint methodology proposed by the Global Footprint Network (GFN) seems to be not entirely appropriate for small countries with less than one million inhabitants [Ewing et al., 2008]. This may be a

reason why e.g. results for Luxembourg, a country with 470,000

inhabitants, have never been included into official country Footprint comparisons. Therefore, the methodology needs to be adapted to be

used for communication purpose in Luxembourg. This contribution

presents Luxembourg’s approach for illustrating the national consumption impacts to finally discuss the integration of the Ecological Footprint as an indicator for sustainable development in the national indicator system.

The Ecological Footprint is one possible approach to assess the environmental impacts of national consumption patterns. The statistics taken into account represent all trade flows within a country, covering the resident’s consumption as well

as the activities of non-residents (e.g. tourists and

commuters). In the case of small, highly industrialized

countries with a strong economy, the influence of non-residents may be high, but the 2008 National Footprint Accounts do not allow identifying the responsible parties of the consumption impacts.

As stakeholders and researchers recognize the need for further development of indicators to trace sustainability [Kitzes et al., 2009], the policy application of the Ecological Footprint as an indicator for sustainable development is discussed at national and European levels [Best et al., 2008]. In this context, the Ecological Footprint is discussed to be used as part of a basket of sustainability indicators in Luxembourg. In cooperation with the Government Statistics Service, an agenda will be elaborated to fit the Ecological Footprint to the indicator panel proposed by the Competitiveness Observatory of Luxembourg.

For Luxembourg, based on statistics from 2005, the per capita Footprint was 12 gha - one of the highest worldwide.

However, this result neither reflects the impact of 121,000 cross-border commuters (equal to one quarter of the population) which worked and consumed in Luxembourg nor quantifies the impacts of road fuel exports. Based on nationally available expenditure statistics, emission models and expert knowledge (Fig. 1), 62% of Luxembourg’s total Consumption Footprint can be allocated to the residents, 16% to the commuters and 22% to fuel tourism (Fig. 2).

The Ecological Footprint communicates for developed countries and their citizens how much land is consumed worldwide due to their way of life. It raises the awareness of global resource depletion and the individual responsibility for global problems. Therefore, it is essential to correctly communicate Luxembourg’s total consumption Footprint including the allocation to the residents and non-residents without ignoring Luxembourg’s responsibility for the impacts of non-residents. National workshops will be organized to satisfy both needs - to transfer technical knowledge on the Ecological Footprint methodology and to provide guidance on how the concept

can be used for awareness raising, education and public relations.

!

Figure 2: Luxembourg’s Footprint Composition!

Figure 1: Luxembourg’s Footprint Splitting Approach!

References:

Best, A. et al. (2008). Potential of the Ecological Footprint for monitoring environmental impacts from natural resource use: Analysis of the potential of the Ecological Footprint and related assessment tools for use in the EU’s Thematic Strategy on the Sustainable Use of Natural Resources. Report to the European Commission, DG Environment. Ewing, B. et al. (2008). The ecological footprint Atlas 2008. Oakland: Global Footprint Network.

Références

Documents relatifs

Ce questionnaire à choix multiple (QCM) donne 1 point par bonne réponse, enlève 0,25 point par mauvaise réponse, et ne pénalise pas l’absence de réponse.. Il n’y a qu’une

This  document  constitutes  the  first  working  paper  from  a  series  of  more  to  come, that function as progress reports of  the  SUSTAINLUX 

The project, SUSTAIN_GOV, aims at investigating sustainable spatial development policies in the context of governance, both with respect to Luxembourg and, as a comparative ap-

- Roger : Et notre Momo, coincé le cul comme un crabe, dans son fauteuil qui s'est replié sur.. lui… pris

• id_work : Un numéro id pour chaque lieu est défini arbitrairement et ne doit pas se retrouver deux fois dans la même table.. Pour remplir les autres colonnes du tableau,

Sophie est stricte et bourgeoise, Julie serait plutôt « ethnique », Laurence assez BCBG, Simon genre baba cool, Marie-Béatrice très catholique, Sébastien frimeur

Il suffit juste de trouver une action répétitive à exercer en tout temps dans la réalité — un repère en quelque sorte — pour que lorsque vous rêviez vous

In summary, based on the regression models, there is strong evidence that all three categories (linguistic, communicative and didactic) are essential components in