Prognosis Factor in Oculomotor Schwannoma: A Case of Endoscopic Endonasal Approach and Systematic Review of the Literature
Abad Cherif El Asri
1,3, Mohamed M. Arnaout
1,4, Mina M. Gerges
1,5, Miloudi Gazzaz
3, Brahim El Mostarchid
3, Theodore H. Schwartz
1,2INTRODUCTION
Intracranial schwannomas constitute approximately 8%e10% of all intracranial neoplasms, with vestibular schwannomas being the most common among them.
Nonvestibular schwannomas constitute only 10% of all schwannomas and include, in descending order of frequency, those arising from the trigeminal nerve, facial nerve, and lower cranial nerves.
1-3How- ever, oculomotor nerve (ON) schwanno- mas, with an equal predilection for the cisternal and cavernous sinus and orbital locations, are very rare, with only few re- ported cases in the literature.
4-7Consequently, very limited literature exists for the optimal management of oc- ulomotor schwannoma. Transcranial sur- gery was historically the most frequently used approach for managing this tumor.
There are no agreed-on criteria for when surgical or nonsurgical management is indicated, with little discussion of radio- surgery and no cases in which an endo- scopic endonasal approach (EEA) was used.
4,5,8-10We report the first case in the literature of an expanded endoscopic skull-base approach for biopsy of an ocu- lomotor schwannoma. This case was extending into the cavernous sinus, and open surgery was considered to be unsafe.
The goal was biopsy for diagnosis with radiosurgery reserved for interval growth.
Function preservation was the motivation.
In addition to reporting our case, we also review the literature on oculomotor schwannoma to establish a consensus regarding best treatment options for this rare lesion.
METHODS
A literature search of the electronic PubMed databases up to December 2018 was conducted using subject headings (Medical Subject Headings) and key words, and limited to human studies. The terms oculomotor schwannoma and com- binations of the variables “schwannoma,”
“neurinoma,” “neurilemoma,” “oculomo- tor nerve,” “third cranial nerve,”
“cavernous sinus,” and “strabismus” were searched. To identify additional eligible
-
BACKGROUND: We report the first case of oculomotor nerve (ON) schwan- noma treatment through an endonasal endoscopic approach. We also review the literature to determine prognosis factors of ON function after treatment.
-
METHODS: A complete MEDLINE search was undertaken for all articles reporting data for oculomotor schwannoma. We divided the patient population into 2 groups; Group I: patients who conserved or recovered good ON function and Group II: patients with either new, worsening, or unchanged third-nerve palsy at the last available follow-up. We conducted a comparative statistical analysis of data between the 2 groups.
-
RESULTS: We identified 55 reported cases of ON schwannoma, all of whom were treated with open transcranial surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, or observation. There were 22 patients in group I and 33 in group II. At admission, 29 patients had complete oculomotor nerve palsy (34.7% in group I and 67.7% in group II; P [ 0.02). Surgical treatment was performed in 36 cases. Radiosurgery was performed in 3 cases. Among patients with good preoperative ON function, 34.6% worsened at last follow-up (26.6% after surgery and 50% with observation;
P [ 0.03). In total, 31% of patients with total or near-total palsy at admission had an improvement of their ON function (all after surgical resection; P [ 0.05).
-
CONCLUSIONS: ON function at admission and surgical resection of schwannoma appears to be a predictive factor of favorable prognosis regardless of location and tumor size. The endonasal endoscopic approach can be used to biopsy tumors in cases in which open surgery is considered too risky, such as cavernous sinus schwannomas.
Key words
-Cavernous sinus
-Endoscopic endonasal
-Extended approach
-Oculomotor nerve
-Palsy
-Schwannoma
-Surgery
-Transsphenoidal
Abbreviations and Acronyms EEA: Endoscopic endonasal approach F: Female
M: Male
MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging ON: Oculomotor nerve
From the Departments of1Neurosurgery and2Otolaryngology and Neuroscience, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA;
3Department of Neurosurgery, Mohamed V Military Hospital, Rabat, Morocco;4Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Sharqia, Egypt; and
5Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
To whom correspondence should be addressed:
Abad Cherif El Asri, M.D.
[E-mail:abad20031@gmail.com]
Citation: World Neurosurg. (2019) 129:72-80.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.170
Journal homepage:www.journals.elsevier.com/world- neurosurgery
Available online:www.sciencedirect.com 1878-8750/$ - see front matterª2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
72
www.SCIENCEDIRECT.com WORLD NEUROSURGERY,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.170Literature Review
Table 1. Summary of Cases of Oculomotor Nerve Schwannoma Reported in the Literature
Study
Age,
years Sex Main Symptoms
Mode of Installation of Symptoms
Onset of Symptoms,
months Tumor Location
Tumor Size,
mm Treatment and Approach
Prognosis of Oculomotor
Function
Oculomotor Function Outcomes
Follow-up, months Present case 56 M Recurrent partial oculomotor
palsy, diplopia and ophtalmologic migraine
Acute or subacute 0.17 Cavernous 24 STR or partial resection via endoscopic expanded
approach
Improved Partial recovery NA
Lee et al., 201811
10 F Acute intermittent headache and mild third-nerve palsy
Acute or subacute 12 Cisternal 3,4 No surgery: oral steroids Worsened Partial recovery 24
Mariniello et al., 201812
38 M Partial third-nerve palsy, proptosis
NA NA Cavernous 20 GTR via pterional approach No change Unchanged third-nerve palsy
and improved proptosis 96
Mariniello et al., 201812
51 F Complete third-nerve palsy, proptosis
NA NA Cavernous 18 GTR via pterional approach No change Unchanged third-nerve palsy
and improved proptosis 132
Mariniello et al., 201812
16 F Complete third-nerve palsy, proptosis
NA NA Cisterno-cavernous 15 GTR via pterional approach with third nerve grafting
Improved Improved 240
Abo-shasha et al., 20184
49 M Recurrent ophthalmoplegic migraine
Acute or subacute 240 Cisterno-cavernous 4 GKS No change Improved 18
Shin et al., 201513
42 M Acute intermittent headache and mild third-nerve palsy
Acute or subacute 180 Cisternal 3 No surgery: analgesic Recurrent Partial recovery 10
Shin et al., 201513
23 F Acute intermittent headache and mild third-nerve palsy
Acute or subacute 192 Cisternal 4 No surgery: analgesic Recurrent Completely resolved but intermittent recurrent
84
Shin et al., 201513
41 F Acute Intermittent Headache and mild third-nerve palsy
Acute or subacute 144 Cisternal 3 No surgery: oral steroids Recurrent Resolved but intermittent recurrent
144
Shin et al., 201513
43 M Acute Intermittent Headache and mild third-nerve palsy
Acute or subacute 108 Orbital 4 No surgery: oral steroids Recurrent Partial recovery 108
Kumar et al., 201414
29 M Diplopia Delayed 2 Cavernous 30 STR or partial resection Worsened Complete third-nerve palsy,
SRS treatment
24
Nonaka et al., 201415
33 F Acute intermittent headache and mild third-nerve palsy
Acute or subacute 6 Cavernous 31 GTR via OZ-FT Unchanged
intermittent
No change NA
Nonaka et al., 201415
20 F Headache, dizziness, and vomiting
Delayed 6 Cisternal 65 GTR via OZ-FT Improved Partial third-nerve palsy NA
Nonaka et al., 201415
18 M Ptosis NA NA Cisternal 5 No surgery: observation NA No change 24
Nonaka et al., 201415
58 M NA NA NA Cisterno-cavernous 32 STR or partial resection via
FT-P approach
Unchanged complete palsy
Worsened NA
Kim et al., 201516
31 F Diplopia, headache, and ptosis
Acute or subacute 60 Cisternal 3 No surgery: IV and oral prednisone
No change Partial third-nerve Palsy 12
M, male; STR, subtotal resection; NA, not available; F, female; GTR, gross total resection; GKS, Gamma-knife surgery; SRS, stereotactic radiosurgery; OZ-FT, orbito zygomatic-fronto-temporal; FT-P, fronto-temporo-pterional; IV, intravenous.
Continues
WORLDNEUROSURGERY129:72-80,SEPTEMBER2019www.journals.elsevier.com/world-neurosurgery
73 L
ITERATURER
EVIEWABADCHERIFELASRIETAL.PROGNOSISFACTORINOCULOMOTORSCHWANNOMA
Table 1. Continued
Study
Age,
years Sex Main Symptoms
Mode of Installation of Symptoms
Onset of Symptoms,
months Tumor Location
Tumor Size,
mm Treatment and Approach
Prognosis of Oculomotor
Function
Oculomotor Function Outcomes
Follow-up, months Kim et al.,
201516
52 M Diplopia, headache, and ptosis
Acute or subacute 0.1 Cisternal 3 No surgery: IV and oral prednisone
No change Partial third-nerve Palsy 12
Suenaga et al., 20147
79 F Oculomotor nerve palsy NA NA Cisternal 15 STR or partial resection via
pterional transsylvian approach
Improved Complete third-nerve palsy 58
Kauser et al., 201417
32 M Proptosis Delayed 6 Orbito-cavernous 43 GTR Worsened Complete third-nerve Palsy 4
Senapati et al., 201418
24 F Diplopia, ptosis Delayed 24 Cisternal 62 GTR No change Complete third-nerve Palsy 12
Cho et al., 201419
41 F Blurred vision Acute or subacute 0.25 Orbito-cavernous 24 STR or partial resection via FT-P approach
Improved Partial third-nerve palsy 12
Iijima et al., 201420
37 F Cognitive impairment, hydrocephalus
Delayed 3 Cisterno-cavernous 50 STR or partial resection Improved Oculomotor function intact 2
Scheller et al., 201321
42 F Anisocoria, exophthalmos Acute or subacute 1.67 Orbital 17 GTR Improved No change 48
Yang et al., 201322
3 M Convulsion, ptosis Acute or subacute 0.33 Cisternal 13 GTR Worsened Near-complete third-nerve
palsy
12
Wang et al., 201323
30 M Headache, nausea, diplopia, ophthalmoplegia
Acute or subacute 60 Cisternal NA STR or partial resection No change Third-nerve palsy NA
Nagashim et al., 201224
58 M Ocular pain, blindness Delayed 24 Orbito-cavernous NA GTR No change Complete third-nerve palsy 6
Furtado et al., 20129
21 M Diplopia Delayed 6 Cisterno-cavernous 15 GTR No change Complete third-nerve palsy 12
Furtado et al., 20129
25 M Third-nerve palsy, diplopia Delayed 4 Orbito-cavernous 50 GTR No change Complete third-nerve palsy 15
Prabhu et al., 201025
38 F Recurrent headache, dizziness, diplopia, ptosis
Acute or subacute NA Cisternal 35 GTR Worsened Complete third-nerve palsy 6
Goel et al., 20103
32 M Headache, ptosis, diplopia Delayed 3 Cisternal 41 GTR Improved Oculomotor function intact 52
Chewning et al., 20082
14 F Ptosis, headaches, third- nerve palsy
Acute or subacute 0.33 Cisternal 4 No surgery: observation No change No change NA
Shamim et al., 200826
11 F Total esotropia Delayed 36 Orbital NA GTR Improved Esotropia, improved NA
Kim et al., 20086
29 M Ptosis NA NA Cisternal 3 GKS No change Unchanged 9
74
www.SCIENCEDIRECT.comWORLDNEUROSURGERY,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.170L
ITERATURER
EVIEWABADCHERIFELASRIETAL.PROGNOSISFACTORINOCULOMOTORSCHWANNOMA
Kim et al., 20086
19 F Ophthalmoplegia NA NA Cisternal 4 GKS No change Unchanged 36
Tanriover et al., 200727
34 F Complete third-nerve palsy, proptosis headache
Acute or subacute 0.67 Cavernous 10 STR or partial resection via pterional approach
Improved Improved NA
Ohata et al., 200628
63 F Headache, ptosis, diplopia Acute or subacute 1 Cavernous 25 STR or partial resection No change Complete third-nerve palsy 72
Bisdorff et al., 200629
14 F Headache, ptosis, diplopia Delayed 144 Cisternal 7 No surgery: observation No change No change 4
Kozic et al., 200630
9 M Ptosis, hemiparesis Acute or subacute NA Cisternal 27 STR or partial resection Worsened
(malignant tumor)
Aggression with malignant- nature third-nerve palsy,
strabismus surgery
NA
Murakami et al., 200531
11 F Recurrent ptosis, diplopia, headache
Acute or subacute 60 Cisternal 5 GTR Worsened Third-nerve palsy,
strabismus surgery
1
Netuka and Benes, 200332
12 F Headaches Delayed 10 Cisternal 28 GTR Recovered after
worsening
Third-nerve palsy 12
Hatakeyama et al., 200333
33 M Diplopia, ptosis Delayed 8 Cisterno-cavernous 40 GTR Improved Oculomotor function intact 7
Sarma et al., 200234
36 F Diplopia, third-nerve palsy NA NA Cavernous 7 GTR Improved Third-nerve palsy,
strabismus surgery
96
Norman et al., 200135
0,17 M Third-nerve palsy NA NA Cavernous 3 No surgery: observation Worsened Third-nerve palsy,
strabismus surgery
96
Norman et al., 200135
0,75 F Anisocoria NA NA Cavernous 3 No surgery: observation Worsened Third-nerve palsy 8
Norman et al., 200135
2 F Anisocoria NA NA Cisternal 3 No surgery: observation Worsened Third-nerve palsy 11
Norman et al., 200135
0,17 M Ptosis NA NA Cisternal 3 No surgery: observation Worsened Third-nerve palsy 48
Norman et al., 200135
3 F Exotropia NA NA Cavernous NA No surgery: observation Worsened Third-nerve palsy,
strabismus surgery
84
Katoh et al., 200036
66 F Asymptomatic NA NA Cisterno-cavernous 15 GTR Worsened Complete third-nerve palsy 6
Lingawi et al., 200037
53 M Headache Delayed 3 Cisternal 5 GTR No change Oculomotor function intact 6
Kawasaki, 199938
23 F Diplopia, nausea, and headache
Acute or subacute 216 Cisternal 4 No surgery: oral steroids No change Episodic third-nerve palsy and migraine
36
Asaoka et al., 19998
64 F Headache Delayed NA Cisternal 15 STR or partial resection Recovered after
worsening
Partial third-nerve palsy 36
Mariniello et al., 199912
8 F Third-nerve palsy Delayed 96 Cavernous 10 GTR Improved Partial third-nerve palsy 24
M, male; STR, subtotal resection; NA, not available; F, female; GTR, gross total resection; GKS, Gamma-knife surgery; SRS, stereotactic radiosurgery; OZ-FT, orbito zygomatic-fronto-temporal; FT-P, fronto-temporo-pterional; IV, intravenous.
WORLDNEUROSURGERY129:72-80,SEPTEMBER2019www.journals.elsevier.com/world-neurosurgery
75 L
ITERATURER
EVIEWABADCHERIFELASRIETAL.PROGNOSISFACTORINOCULOMOTORSCHWANNOMA
studies, the reference lists also were screened for articles. An analysis of the published studies concerning clinical and radiologic characteristics, treatment, and outcomes was performed. Articles written in a language other than English were excluded, as were abstracts, editorials, letters, or comments.
The data extraction included the following parameters: 1) year of publica- tion and author; 2) age and sex; 3) onset of symptoms; 4) signs on admission; 5) tu- mor location; 6) tumor size; 7) treatment;
and 8) outcomes. At the last reported follow-up we divided the outcomes of patients according to improvement, dete- rioration or stability of third nerve func- tion compared with before treatment.
The aim of our study was to compare treatment options for third-nerve schwannoma and compare functional outcomes with the endonasal endoscopic case we present. According to the results reported by the investigators, we divided the patient population into 2 groups:
Group I: patients who conserved or recovered good third-nerve function at the last available follow-up.
Group II: patients who had worsening or unchanged third-nerve palsy at the last available follow-up.
We conducted a comparative statistical analysis of the epidemiologic, clinical, radiologic, and therapeutic parameters between the 2 groups. Qualitative param- eters were compared using the c
2test, and quantitative parameters were compared using the independent samples t test. All statistical results were considered as sig- nificant if P < 0.05. The analysis was performed with the SPSS 21 package software (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA).
RESULTS
A MEDLINE search resulted in 55 cases of oculomotor schwannoma. The data of all 55 patients, including those of the current case, are summarized in Table 1.
2-4,6-9,11-40There were 22 patients in group I and 33 in group II.
Case Illustration
A 56-year-old male patient complained of 5 months of acute ocular pain, diplopia, and proptosis in the right eye. Examina- tion revealed near-complete right eye
ptosis, symmetric pupils, and deficits of supraduction and adduction. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was completed, which showed a 24 8 6-mm lesion extending from the right cavernous sinus into the right orbit (Figure 1). The patient was treated with intravenous and oral steroids, and he had improvement in the eye pain as well as the double vision.
Repeat MRI 4 months later showed no change in the appearance of the lesion, and his symptoms began to recur. Given the location of the tumor, open transcranial surgery thought felt to be too risky. EEA was used in a stepwise manner; after performing a right uncinectomy, a middle turbinate resection, and a wide maxillary antrostomy and ethmoidectomy, the sphenoid sinus was entered and widely enlarged. This provided a panoramic view before we exposed the medial aspect of the superior orbital fissure.
Guided by navigation and vascular Doppler probe, the drilling of the lateral wall of the sphenoid sinus between the cavernous sinus and the orbital apex allowed the exposition of the medial part of the superior orbital fissure, and then the dura and the annulus of Zinn were opened.
After retracting upward the medial rectus muscle, we discovered a grayyellow firm tumor, which was partially excised. The patient awoke with a worsening of his partial third-nerve palsy with limited adduction and supraduction but preserved eyelid movement and pu- pillary reaction. At a follow-up visit 4 months later, the ptosis and oculomotor palsy had dramatically improved. MRI showed a small residual located infer- olaterally in the cavernous sinus (Figure 2).
Treatment at this point will include serial imaging and stereotactic radiosurgery at the first sign of growth.
Literature Review Analysis
Demographic Data. Age distribution of 55 patients with oculomotor schwannoma is shown in Table 2. The median of the age was 31.5 years, 36 years for the patients in group I and 27 years for those in group II. No significant difference of age was found between both groups (P ¼ 0.17). The male (M)-to-female (F) ratio was 0.77 (24 M/31 F), 0.46 in group I (7 M/15 F), and 1.13 in group II (17 M/15 F).
Table 1. Continued
StudyAge, yearsSexMainSymptoms Modeof Installation ofSymptoms Onsetof Symptoms, monthsTumorLocation Tumor Size, mmTreatmentandApproach Prognosisof Oculomotor FunctionOculomotor Function OutcomesFollow-up, months Kachhara etal.,19983955FHeadache,diplopia,ptosisDelayed36Cavernous20GTRWorsenedThird-andfourth-nervepalsy16 Kachhara etal.,19983961MHeadache,diplopiaDelayed6Cisterno-cavernous40GTRWorsenedThird-andfourth-nervepalsy12 Niaziand Boggan, 199440
13MDiplopia,headache,ptosisAcuteorsubacute0.67Cisterno-cavernous50STRorpartialresectionImprovedThird-nervepalsy,diplopia improvedNA M,male;STR,subtotalresection;NA,notavailable;F,female;GTR,grosstotalresection;GKS,Gamma-knifesurgery;SRS,stereotacticradiosurgery;OZ-FT,orbitozygomatic-fronto-temporal;FT-P,fronto-temporo-pterional;IV,intravenous.
76
www.SCIENCEDIRECT.com WORLD NEUROSURGERY,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.170L
ITERATURER
EVIEWABAD CHERIF EL ASRI ET AL. PROGNOSIS FACTOR IN OCULOMOTOR SCHWANNOMA
No significant difference of sex was found between both groups (P ¼ 0.1).
Clinical Presentation. The characteristics and clinical presentations of patients in each group are shown in Table 2. The median delay until onset of symptoms was 7 months (9 months in group I and 6 months in group II), without significant difference (P ¼ 0.33).
Symptom presentation was acute to subacute (less than 4 weeks) in 41.6% of patients (57.1% of patients in group I and in 52.6% of patients in group II; P ¼ 0.75). At admission, 29 patients had complete ON palsy (34.7% in group I
and 67.7% in group II) and 24 patients had partial palsy (47.4% in group I and 17.6% in group II), and 2 cases were asymptomatic. The difference between groups was significant (P ¼ 0.02).
Diplopia was the main symptom in 40 cases. Proptosis was reported in 32 cases.
Twelve patients complained of recurrent ophthalmologic migraine, whereas exophthalmos, hemiparesis, blurred vision, or seizures were reported in some cases.
Radiologic Findings. Most cases used MRI to accurately determine the size and loca- tion of the lesions. MRI in these cases
demonstrated that oculomotor schwan- nomas are most frequently located in the interpeduncular cistern in 26 cases (47%);
strictly located in the cavernous sinus in 13 cases (24%); cisterno-cavernous in 9 cases (16.4%), orbito-cavernous in 4 cases (7.3%); and intraorbital in 3 cases (5.5%).
Given the complexity of the surgical management of lesions invading the cavernous sinus, we regrouped all tumors located or extending into the cavernous sinus as a cavernous schwannoma;
consequently, the number of cavernous sinus schwannomas represented was 26 cases (50% of patients in both group I and in group II). The median diameter was 18 mm in group I and 19.3 mm in group II (P ¼ 0.8).
Treatment. Surgical treatment was per- formed in 65.4% of cases (36 patients);
74% in group I and 59.3% in group II with a P ¼ 0.53 (Table 3). Gross total resection was achieved in 66.6% of cases (64.7% of patients in Group I and 68.4% in Group II;
P ¼ 0.82), subtotal resection was achieved in 7 cases, and a biopsy or partial resection in 4 cases. All cases were performed through a craniotomy. Our case is the first EEA. Sixteen patients were observed or received steroid therapy. Radiosurgery was performed in 3 cases.
Outcomes. Follow-up was variable, ranging from 1 month to 20 years, with a mean of 38 months. An analysis of the reported outcomes demonstrated that 15 patients (27.3%) had worsening of their previously oculomotor function, 23 (41.8%) were stable, and 17 (31%) improved after treat- ment (Table 3). Among patients with preoperative good oculomotor function 34.6% (9 patients) worsened at last follow-up (26.6% after surgery and 50%
with observation, P ¼ 0.03). In total, 31%
with total or near-total palsy at the admission had an improvement of their oculomotor function (all after surgical resection; P ¼ 0.05) (Table 4). The 3 patients treated with radiosurgery had an unchanged oculomotor function at the last follow-up.
DISCUSSION
Our study shows a surprising result.
Surgical management of schwannomas appears to result in better long-term function preservation compared with
Figure 1. Preoperative cranial magnetic resonance imaging showing a 2486-mm right cavernous lesion (arrows) that is moderately enhanced with gadolinium on axial T1-weighted (A) and coronal T1-weighted imaging (B).
Figure 2. Cranial magnetic resonance imaging at 4 months postoperatively showing a small residual lesion located inferolaterally in the right cavernous sinus (panelA: axial T1WI with gadolinium and panelB: coronal T1WI with gadolinium).
WORLD NEUROSURGERY
77
L
ITERATURER
EVIEWABAD CHERIF EL ASRI ET AL. PROGNOSIS FACTOR IN OCULOMOTOR SCHWANNOMA
observation. These findings imply that over time, as the schwannomas grow, they cause irreversible damage to the third nerve. The only hope of preserving function is to operate early, before func- tion is lost. Since there was also a cor- relation between preoperative function and outcome, the earlier the operation, the better the long-term outcome. For tumors that cannot be completely removed, a biopsy or partial resection followed by radiosurgery appears pru- dent, since the 3 patients who had radi- osurgery demonstrated preserved oculomotor function. Other than in our case report, the surgical approaches in all reported cases were transcranial
(orbitozygomatic, transzygomatic fronto- temporal, and the transzygomatic sub- temporal). This allowed enough exposure of the tumor and around the inter- peduncular cistern. In fact, most intra- cavernous schwannomas have an extradural (“interdural”) location and are well separated from the cranial nerves and the internal carotid artery by the in- ternal dural layer.
In this report, we demonstrate for the first time that EEA can be used to access oculomotor schwannomas since the medial aspect of the superior orbital fissure can be more easily accessed through an endonasal approach then through a craniotomy.
10,41Although EEA may, in some cases, allow
complete resection of the tumor, the exposure is limited and in our cases only partial resection could be achieved. How- ever, once a definitive diagnosis is made, radiosurgery can be offered soon after to prevent further growth and functional deterioration. During the last decade, similar to the approach used for small- and medium-size vestibular schwannomas, radiosurgery and particularly Gamma Knife surgery have emerged as valuable, safe, and long-term effective, minimally invasive ap- proaches for nonvestibular schwanno- mas.
6-42This approach has been suggested as upfront therapy and an effective treat- ment option for patients with oculomotor schwannomas.
Oculomotor schwannomas may grow anywhere along the course of the ON. The diagnosis of a schwannoma often is made by imaging evaluation and clinical symp- toms that correlate with distribution of the involved nerve. The schwannoma might be strictly located in the interpeduncular cistern, the cavernous sinus, the orbit, or more likely involving more than one of these compartments.
27Schwannomas arising from the ONs almost invariably present with diplopia and objective signs of eye movement dysfunction. Acute and subacute onset are observed in more than one half of reported cases. The very thin structure and vulnerability of these nerves may explain their early anatomic and functional involvement during tumor growth. Sometimes, the clinical presentation may be deceptive, and oculomotor palsy be associated with pain.
4,29,43This has been observed in 23.6% of cases and causes confusion with recurrent migraine. However, the mechanism of intermittent unilateral headaches and ipsilateral ophthalmoplegia can be explained by intermittent release of a chemical substance from the tumors and resultant stimulation of the trigeminal nerve receptors or by repeated inflammation
leading to demyelination
andremyelination.
16,29,31Furthermore, as the tumor grows in size, it compresses surrounding neurovascular structures, causing worsening neurologic deficits such as contralateral or sometimes ipsilateral hemiparesis because of the mass effect on the brainstem posteriorly.
15Both ON and small ON schwannomas are difficult to visualize on conventional Table 2. Epidemiologic and Clinical Characteristics of Reported Cases of Oculomotor
Nerve Schwannoma
Data
All Patients (55 Patients)
Group I (22 Patients)
Group II
(33 Patients) PValue
Age, years, median 31.5 36 27 0.17
Sex
Male 24 7 17 0.1
Female 31 16 15
Onset of symptoms, months 7 9 6 0.33
Mode of installation of symptoms
Acute or subacute 41.6% 57.1% 52.6% 0.75
Progressive 58.4% 42.9% 47.4%
Main symptoms
Diplopia 72.7% 63.6% 78.8% NA
Proptosis 58.1% 22.7% 81.8%
Recurrent ophthalmologic migraine 21.8% 22.7% 21.2%
Other symptoms 12.7% 13.6% 12.1%
Oculomotor function at admission
Good function 46.3% 63.6% 33% 0.03
Poor function 53.7% 36.4% 67%
Site of tumor
Cisternal 47.2% 40.9% 51.5% 0.77
Cavernous 52.8% 58.1% 48.5%
Intracavernous 23.6% 22.7% 24.2%
Cisterno-cavernous 16.3% 18.1% 15.1%
Intraorbital 5.4% 13.6% 0%
Orbito-cavernous 7.2% 4.5% 9.1%
Mean of great diameter, mm 18.8 18 19.3 0.8
NA, not available.
78
www.SCIENCEDIRECT.com WORLD NEUROSURGERY,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.170L
ITERATURER
EVIEWABAD CHERIF EL ASRI ET AL. PROGNOSIS FACTOR IN OCULOMOTOR SCHWANNOMA
MRI. Three-dimensional MRI sequences have become widely available for clinical use in evaluating the intricate structures of cranial nerves.
23,37Steady-state free pre- cession sequences of MRI evidence small- and mid-size parasellar schwannomas as a hypo- or isointense mass, well defined by the high signal intensity of the cerebro- spinal fluid. MRI with diffusion tensor tractography recently has been introduced to identify the cranial nerves, mainly the facial-acoustic complex around vestibular schwannomas. This technique seems useful for identifying the nerve of origin in large ON schwannoma. In total, 34% of
ON schwannomas are less than 5 mm when they are discovered. Careful imaging evaluation is needed to identify schwan- noma due to its small size, location in the brain, and infrequent presentation.
16,37ON schwannoma typically are described as a parasellar or suprasellar mass, often mimicking a medial sphenoid wing or a posterior clinoid meningioma, especially when they occur in a cisternal loca- tion.
2,12,42Lesions tend to be hypo-to iso- intense on T1-weighted images and are invariably hyperintense on T2-weighted studies.
37These features, although relatively nonspecific, may be helpful for
differentiating schwannomas from other tumors such as lymphoma, metastasis, or aneurysm, whereas the differential diagnosis in orbital location includes neurofibroma, hemangiopericytoma, extraconal meningioma, rhabdomyo- sarcoma, pleomorphic adenoma of the lacrimal gland, and venous varix.
24,37CONCLUSIONS
We report the first EEA for management of an oculomotor schwannomas, Oculo- motor nerve function at admission and surgical resection of schwannoma appear to be predictors of favorable prognosis regardless of location and tumor size.
Whenever the ON function is not compromised at diagnosis, we think that radiosurgery could be a valid option, avoiding any surgical risks. Otherwise, a combined approach with planned subtotal removal followed by Gamma Knife surgery should be further explored to determine whether the results compare favorably with open surgical resection.
REFERENCES
1. Bejjani GK, Duong DH, Kalamarides M, Ziyal I, Sullivan BJ. Cerebral vasospasm after tumor resection. A case report. Neurochirurgie. 1997;43:
164-168.
2. Chewning RH, Sasson AD, Jordan LC, Tamargo RJ, Gailloud P. Acute third cranial nerve palsy from a third cranial nerve schwannoma presenting as a saccular aneurysm on three- dimensional computed tomography angiography:
case illustration.J Neurosurg. 2008;108:1037.
3. Goel A, Shah A. “Interdural” oculomotor neu- rinoma: report of two surgically treated cases.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2010;152:1721-1724.
4. Abo-Shasha R, Bauman GS, Fraser JA. Stereotac- tic radiotherapy for presumed oculomotor nerve schwannoma masquerading as "ophthalmoplegic migraine".Can J Ophthalmol. 2018;53:e167-e168.
5. Elsharkawy M, Xu Z, Schlesinger D, Sheehan JP.
Gamma Knife surgery for nonvestibular schwan- nomas: radiological and clinical outcomes.
J Neurosurg. 2012;116:66-72.
6. Kim IY, Kondziolka D, Niranjan A, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD. Gamma Knife surgery for schwan- nomas originating from cranial nerves III, IV, and VI.J Neurosurg. 2008;109(suppl):149-153.
7. Suenaga J, Tateishi K, Takase H, Kanno H, Kawahara N. Oculomotor nerve schwannoma presenting as an entirely cystic homogeneous mass on magnetic resonance imaging: case report.Austin Neurosurg Open Access. 2014;1:1013.
8. Asaoka K, Sawamura Y, Murai H, Satoh M.
Schwannoma of the oculomotor nerve: a case
Table 3. Management and Outcomes of Reported Cases of Oculomotor Nerve Schwannoma
Data
All Patients (55 Patients)
Group I (22 Patients)
Group II
(33 Patients) PValue
Management
Observation or steroid therapy 30% 23% 33% 0.65
Surgical procedure 65% 73% 67%
Gross total resection 51% 49% 58%
Partial or subtotal removal 28% 19% 42%
Radiosurgery 5% 5% 7% 0.43
Mean follow-up, months 38 55 29
Oculomotor function outcomes NA
Worsened 27% 0% 46%
Unchanged 42% 36% 52%
Improved 31% 64% 3%
NA, not available.
Table 4. Comparison of Oculomotor Function According to Its Preoperative Statue
Oculomotor Function Outcomes Worsened Unchanged Improved PValuePatients admitted with good oculomotor function
Nonoperated patients (10 patients) 50% 50% 0 0.03
Operated patients (15 patients) 26.6% 26.6% 46.8%
Gamma knife surgery (1 patient) 0 100% 0
All patients (27 patients) 34.6% 38.4% 27%
Patients admitted with poor oculomotor function
Nonoperated patients (6 patients) 0 100% 0 0.05
Operated patients (21 patients) 23.9% 33.3% 42.8%
Gamma knife surgery (2 patients) 0 100% 0
All patients (29 patients) 20.6% 48.2% 31%
WORLD NEUROSURGERY
79
L
ITERATURER
EVIEWABAD CHERIF EL ASRI ET AL. PROGNOSIS FACTOR IN OCULOMOTOR SCHWANNOMA
report with consideration of the surgical treat- ment.Neurosurgery. 1999;45:630-634.
9. Furtado SV, Hegde AS. Management of oculomotor nerve schwannomas in two different locations: surgical nuances and comprehensive review.Neurosurg Rev. 2012;35:27-34.
10. Amin SM, Fathy H, Hussein A, Kamel M, Hegazy A, Fathy M. Endoscopic endonasal approach to the lateral wall of the cavernous si- nus: a cadaveric feasibility study.Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2018;127:903-911.
11. Lee D, Kim WJ, Kim MM. Recurrent isolated oc- ulomotor nerve palsy caused by schwannoma in a pediatric patient. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018;66:
1367-1369.
12. Mariniello G, de Divitiis O, Caranci F, Dones F, Maiuri F. Parasellar schwannomas: extradural vs extra-intradural surgical approach.Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2018;14:627-638.
13. Shin RK, Mejico LJ, Kawasaki A, et al. Transient ocular motor nerve palsies associated with pre- sumed cranial nerve schwannomas.
J Neuroophthalmol. 2015;35:139-143.
14. Kumar L, Monica I, Uppin M, Kotiyala V. Large oculomotor nerve schwannoma—rare entity: a case report with review of literature.J Cancer Res Ther. 2014;10:1098-1100.
15. Nonaka Y, Fukushima T, Friedman AH, Kolb LE, Bulsara KR. Surgical management of nonvascular lesions around the oculomotor nerve.World Neu- rosurg. 2014;81:798-809.
16. Kim R, Kim JH, Kim E, Yang HK, Hwang JM, Kim JS. Oculomotor nerve tumors masquerading as recurrent painful ophthalmoplegic neuropathy:
report of two cases and review of the literature.
Cephalalgia. 2015;35:825-830.
17. Kauser H, Rashid O, Anwar W, Khan S. Orbital oculomotor nerve schwannoma extending to the cavernous sinus: a rare cause of proptosis.
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2014;9:514-516.
18. Senapati SB, Mishra SS, Das S, Parida DK. Giant oculomotor nerve schwannoma presenting as a sellar and suprasellar mass with parasellar exten- sion.Neurol India. 2014;62:548-549.
19. Cho YH, Sung KS, Song YJ, Kim DC, Choi S, Kim KU. Oculomotor nerve schwannoma: a case report.Brain Tumor Res Treat. 2014;2:43-47.
20. Iijima K, Tosaka M, Nagano T, et al. Oculomotor nerve schwannoma associated with acute
hydrocephalus: case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2014;54:654-658.
21. Scheller C, Rachinger JC, Prell J, et al. Intraorbital oculomotor nerve schwannoma affecting only the parasympatheticfibers. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2013;74:120-123.
22. Yang SS, Li ZJ, Liu X, Li Y, Li SF, Zhang HD.
Pediatric isolated oculomotor nerve schwannoma:
a new case report and literature review.Pediatr Neurol. 2013;48:321-324.
23. Wang Q, Guo Y, Zhang Y, et al. 3D MRI of ocu- lomotor nerve schwannoma in the prepontine cistern: a case report. Clin Imaging. 2013;37:
947-949.
24. Nagashima H, Yamamoto K, Kawamura A, Nagashima T, Nomura K, Yoshida M. Pediatric orbital schwannoma originating from the oculo- motor nerve.J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2012;9:165-168.
25. Prabhu SS, Bruner JM. Large oculomotor schwannoma presenting as a parasellar mass: a case report and literature review.Surg Neurol Int.
2010;1:15.
26. Shamim MS, Bari ME, Chisti KN, Abbas A.
A child with intra-orbital oculomotor nerve schwannoma without neurofibromatosis. Can J Neurol Sci. 2008;35:528-530.
27. Tanriover N, Kemerdere R, Kafadar AM, Muhammedrezai S, Akar Z. Oculomotor nerve schwannoma located in the oculomotor cistern.
Surg Neurol. 2007;67:83-88.
28. Ohata K, Takami T, Goto T, Ishibashi K.
Schwannoma of the oculomotor nerve.Neurol In- dia. 2006;54:437-439.
29. Bisdorff AR, Wildanger G. Oculomotor nerve schwannoma mimicking ophthalmoplegic migraine.Cephalalgia. 2006;26:1157-1159.
30. Kozic D, Nagulic M, Ostojic J, et al. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor of the oculomotor nerve.Acta Radiol. 2006;47:595-598.
31. Murakami T, Funatsuka M, Komine M, et al. Oc- ulomotor nerve schwannoma mimicking oph- thalmoplegic migraine. Neuropediatrics. 2005;36:
395-398.
32. Netuka D, Benes V. Oculomotor nerve schwan- noma.Br J Neurosurg. 2003;17:168-173.
33. Hatakeyama H, Saito K, Nagatani T, Patel SJ, Yoshida J. Schwannoma in the crural cistern removed without permanent functional deficits—
case report.Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2003;43:95-99.
34.Sarma S, Sekhar LN, Schessel DA. Nonvestibular schwannomas of the brain: a 7-year experience.
Neurosurgery. 2002;50:437-449.
35. Norman AA, Farris BK, Siatkowski RM. Neuroma as a cause of oculomotor palsy in infancy and early childhood.J AAPOS. 2001;5:9-12.
36. Katoh M, Kawamoto T, Ohnishi K, Sawamura Y, Abe H. Asymptomatic schwannoma of the ocu- lomotor nerve: case report.J Clin Neurosci. 2000;7:
458-460.
37. Lingawi SS. Oculomotor nerve schwannoma: MRI appearance.Clin Imaging. 2000;24:86-88.
38. Kawasaki A. Oculomotor nerve schwannoma associated with ophthalmoplegic migraine.Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;128:658-660.
39. Kachrara R, Nair S, Radhakrishnan VV. Oculo- motor nerve neurinoma: report of two cases.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1998;140:1147-1151.
40. Niazi W, Boggan JE. Schwannoma of extraocular nerves: survey of literature and case report of an isolated third nerve schwannoma.Skull Base Surg.
1994;4:219-226.
41. Patrona A, Patel KS, Bander ED, et al. Endoscopic endonasal surgery for nonadenomatous, non- meningeal pathology involving the cavernous si- nus.J Neurosurg. 2017;126:880-888.
42. Fang C, Leavitt JA, Hodge DO, Holmes JM, Mohney BG, Chen JJ. Incidence and etiologies of acquired third nerve palsy using a population- based method.JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135:23-28.
43.Peciu-Florianu I, Tuleasca C, Comps JN, et al.
Radiosurgery in trochlear and abducens nerve schwannomas: case series and systematic review.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017;159:2409-2418.
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that the article content was composed in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Received 21 February 2019; accepted 20 May 2019 Citation: World Neurosurg. (2019) 129:72-80.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.170
Journal homepage:www.journals.elsevier.com/world- neurosurgery
Available online:www.sciencedirect.com 1878-8750/$ - see front matterª2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
80
www.SCIENCEDIRECT.com WORLD NEUROSURGERY,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.170L
ITERATURER
EVIEWABAD CHERIF EL ASRI ET AL. PROGNOSIS FACTOR IN OCULOMOTOR SCHWANNOMA