• Aucun résultat trouvé

قياس أمثلة المحفظة الاستثمارية باستخدام الخوارزميات الجينية حالة أسهم بورصة الجزائر

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "قياس أمثلة المحفظة الاستثمارية باستخدام الخوارزميات الجينية حالة أسهم بورصة الجزائر"

Copied!
14
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)





                      habib.zouaoui@gmail.com Nadjat_meriem@outlook.fr

Measuring of Optimal Investment Portfolio Using Genetic Algorithm

Case of Algeria Stock Exchange

Habib ZOUAOUI 1& Meriem-Nadjet NAAS 2 1. University of TAHAR Moulay SAIDA –Algeria

2. University Center of Relizane –Algeria

Received:04 Aug 2014 Accepted: 26 Dec 2014 Published: 30 June 2015

 :         ) GA (             2010/01/31 -2010/12/31        .  .           jel  G11 Abstract:

This study aims to address the problems of risk management portfolio of bank loans based on the diversification strategy sector, and seeks primarily to the application of genetic algorithms (GA) to improve the Markowitz model (return - risk), The problem of portfolio optimization is a multi-objective problem that aims at simultaneously maximizing the expected return of the portfolio and minimizing portfolio risk. Present study is a heuristic approach to portfolio optimization problem using genetic algorithms technique.

The present study data on a sample of stocks price between 31/01/2010 -31/12/2010 in the Algerian stock Exchange. Further more in an attempt to evaluate the effectiveness of genetic algorithms to improve the level of risk optimization.

Keywords : Optimal portfolio, Diversification, Artificial intelligence, Genetic Algorithm, Return & Risk . (JEL) Classification : G11

(2)

                          

Modern Portfolio Theory

    1990                          1952                         1      (Métaheuristic)                       2 1          2             

(3)

                          3              Efficient portfolio                 4                    2010/01/31 -2010/12/31             1990      Diversification                    H. Markowitz,1952  .                                                          .                                     Static Model    Dynamic Model  .  

(4)

1    1.1       1952                   3                           Covariance)        4   2.1   Static Model                                 5  (2.1)…. ....   

 

         1 : / : e w R R w c s Vw w Min P        1 : / ; : ' ' ' e w k Vw w c s R w Max

(5)

           1               (2.2)  (2.3) 3.1   Dynamic Model    Continuous-time       

Regime Switching Models

6                  ,1969  P.A.Samuelson     N.H.Hakansson ,1971      ,1997  S.R.Pliska         Optimal Dynamic Strategies      H.Richardson, 1991 & D.Duffie     M.Schweizer ,1996      2000  ,  Zhou & Li    

Stochastic Linear Quadratic

  7     1999 

J.Yong & X.Y.Chou

            Stochastic Differential Equations                *   Markov Chain   Brownian Motion 8    ,1995 

R. Korn & S. Trautmann

  9  

ij

ij n n n n V e R R R R R R w w w        1 1 1 1 ) 1 ,...., 1 ( ) ,...., ( ) ,...., ( ) ,...., (

RP

(6)

 

  

 

Engle & Ferstenberg , 2007

 

Garleanu & Pedersen, 2009

             Transaction Costs         10   (2.4)  (2.5) (2.6)       (2.7)    (2.8)      :     t :  t    Xt :    t     ft :   t     :     G :     pt :  t .                     Artificial Intelligence                                

(7)

                                 –                   1970                MichiganUniversity of        Johon Holland

                                                 Optimization Problem                           11              1993      Franklin    Risto Karijalainen                   1998    Herbert Dawid   Michael Kope            Sylvie Geisendorf  2000                 Alfons Balmann   Katrin Happe    2003   Pmar Keskinocak  Feryal Erhun    2012    12   146    M. Garkaz    2011    

S.Sefiane & M. Benbouziane

    2012   

(8)

1.2                                             13      Start                    Fitness Function   .         New Population                     Selection   Parents Chromosomes     (2.9)   fi      i   n            r   ] 0 ، 1 [   r<p1                  : r<pi < pi-1    Crossover  Offspring        Mutation                       Replacement                

(9)

 Test        Stopping Creteria                                     :                                 R+

   wi   

Monthly closing prices

                 31 / 01 / 2010   31 / 12 / 2010   w1 :   SONELGAZ/14

w2 :   Air Algériew3 :   Alg Telecomw4 :   EGH EL AURASSI w5 :    SAIDAL 1                      

RP

(10)

                      2   Fitness function                                      (2.10)                  3   Population The                    50     50      4          .   5     Stopping Creteria                                100                           Current portfolio 

(11)

                 Inputs    R+   Arithmetic Crossover     13    4       Chromosome   

Objective function value

   Variance of Portfolio  Mean Return of Portfolio      Computing time 1 0,90612% 2,984% 0,3610% 3,5840 2 0,146695% 3,238% 0,4750% 3,2580 3 0,153187% 3,734% 0,5720% 3,1950 5 0,157452% 4,522% 0,7120% 2,7560 11 0,176732% 4,934% 0,872 % 2,5480   R+  5   W5 W4 W3 W2 W1 0,1699% 0,1182% 0,1788% 0,4102% 0,1229%    R+            GA     fitness function               Maximization      0 10     4  5                         W1 = 12,29% :   SONELGAZ/14    W2 = 41,02% :   Air-Algérie      W3 = 17,88% :   Alg-Telecom     W4 = 11,82% :    EGH EL AURASSI    W5 = 16,99% :  SAIDAL    4,934%  0,872 %   

(12)

    Markowitz                                         

(13)

     1      01 / 2010 -12 / 2010       http://www.sgbv.dz     2   Portfolio weights         Excel   R+    01  2010   SAIDAL EGH EL AURASSI Alg Telecom Air Algérie SONELGAZ/14 0,00067 0,0224 0,00016 0,00025 -0,00197  Mean 2,706 0,00068 0,000315 5,2 1,1454  Variance   http://www.sgbv.dz     02                   Var-Cov Matrix SAIDAL EGH EL AURASSI Alg Telecom Air Algérie SONELGAZ/14 1,146 1,036 -2,145 8,983 1,1454 SONELGAZ/14 1,146 1,036 -3,938 5,2 8,982 Air Alegrie -1,0489 0,00016 0,000315 -3,94 -2,145 Alg Telecom -1,852 0,00068 0,00016 1,097 0,00068 EGH EL AURASSI 2,7062 -1,852 -1,0489 -2,51 1,1464 SAIDAL

(14)

      http://www.sgbv.dz     03       http://www.sgbv.dz            1 .      »   «      2008    

R. J. Kuo, and C. W. Hong" , Integration of Genetic Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization for Investment Portfolio Optimization", Applied

Mathematics & Information Sciences An International Journal ; Sci. 7, No. 6, PP :2397-2408 .

2 .                                 2    2014   117 -136 .   3 .      1998    4 .               »            «      2    1989   

5. Jean-Luc Prigent, « Portfolio Optimization and Performance Analysis », Financial -Mathematics Series, Chapman & Hall/CRC is an imprint of Taylor & Francis Group, U.S, 2007, PP: 70-78.

6. James D.Hamilton, « Regime-Switching Models», Palgrave dictionary of Economics, USA, 2005.

7. Min Dai , Zuo Quan Xu, Xun Yu Zhou, “Continuous-Time Markowitz’s Model with Transaction Costs”, 2009 .

www.math.nus.edu.sg/~matdm/mv-transaction6.pdf (16/10/2012). 8 .           2011   108 -120 .  

9. Xun Yu Zhou and G.Yin ,”Markowitz’s Mean-Variance Portfolio Selection with Regime Switching : A Continuous-Time Model “ ,March 2006,

PP:5-11.

10. Esben Hedegaard, “Robust Dynamic Asset Allocation With Imperfect Predictors”,November ( 2011) , PP:4-6 . web Site: www.people.stern.nyu.edu/ehedegaa/PDFs/RobustDynamicAssetAllocation.pdf (16/10/2012).

11. A.K.Misra, « Portfolio Optimization of Commercial Banks - An Application of Genetic Algorithm », European Journal of Business and

Management , 2013, Vol.5, No.6, P 120.

12 .                         21  2012      304 -315 .    .       (Stochastic Process)   .       

13. Slimane Sefiane,Mohamed Benbouziane, “Portfolio Selection Using Genetic Algorithm”,Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 2012, vol.2,

no.4.

14. Luca Scrucca, "GA: A Package for Genetic Algorithms in R", Journal of Statistical Software, 2013 ,Volume 53, Issue 4. http://www.jstatsoft.org/ . Correlation.Matrix SAIDAL EGH EL AURASSI Alg Telecom Air Algérie SONELGAZ/14 0,20591 0,11683 -0,35691 0,36805 1 SONELGAZ/14 -0,21122 0,58071 -0,00308 1 0,36805 Air Alegrie -0,00359 0,34610 1 -0,00308 -0,35691 Alg Telecom -0,04297 1 0,34610 0,58071 0,11683 EGH EL AURASSI 1 -0,04297 -0,00359 -0,21122 0,20591 SAIDAL

Références

Documents relatifs

To exhibit the value added of implementing a Bayesian learning approach in our problem, we have illustrated the value of information sensitivity to various key parameters and

Finally, we compare the Sharpe ratios obtained by the standard mean-variance allocation and the penalized one for four dif- ferent reference portfolios: equal-weights,

I have examined a continuous-time intertemporal consumption and portfolio choice problem for an ambiguity-averse investor when expected returns of a risky asset are unobservable

The aim of this article is to develop a new method to jointly estimate mean and variance functions in the framework of smoothing spline analysis of variance (SS-ANOVA, see Wahba

The theoretical results given in Section 3.2 and 3.3.2 are confirmed by the simulation study: when the complexity of the model collection a equals log(n), AMDL satisfies the

We then provide a verification theorem which gives the optimal strategy for the mean-variance hedging using the solution of the previous system of BSDEs.. Finally, we prove that

Keywords: Conditional Semivariance, Conditional Variance, DownSide Risk, Kernel Method, Nonparametric Mean

to isolate a basket with optimal mean reversion from a multivariate sample path of an asset process, while constraining the variance (or signal strength) of the resulting basket to