C OMPOSITIO M ATHEMATICA
Y OSEF Y OMDIN
On the local structure of a generic central set
Compositio Mathematica, tome 43, n
o2 (1981), p. 225-238
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=CM_1981__43_2_225_0>
© Foundation Compositio Mathematica, 1981, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Compositio Mathematica » (http:
//http://www.compositio.nl/) implique l’accord avec les conditions géné- rales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infrac- tion pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
225
ON THE LOCAL STRUCTURE OF A GENERIC CENTRAL SET
Yosef Yomdin
© 1981 Sijthoff & Noordhoff International Publishers - Alphen aan den Rijn
Printed in the Netherlands
1. Introduction
Let
Q
be a closed subset ofRn, n ~
2. A closed ballB,
B C RnQ,
which is not a proper subset of another ballB1, Ble
RnQ,
is calleda maximal ball. The set
consisting
of the centers of all maximal balls is called the central set ofQ
and is denotedby C(Q).
The notion ofthe central set
(for Q
= aG - theboundary
of an open bounded domain G inR n )
was introduced and studiedby
D. Milman in[8], [9], [10].
For z E R n and
y E Q
letp(z, y ) = z - yl2
=(z -
y, z -y ),
where(,)
denotes the scalar
produce
in R n.Suppose,
thatQ
is a smooth submanifold of R n. Then for each z ~ Rn,p(z, .): Q - R
is a smoothfunction on
Q.
The cut locus ofQ
is definedby
R. Thom in[ 11]
as the set,consisting
of all z for whichp(z, .)
has either at least twoequal
absolute minima or one
degenerate
absolute minimum. As shown in[9],
in this caseC(Q)
coincides with the cut locus ofQ.
Under the name skeleton the notion of the central set is also studied in the
Theory
of PatternRecognition (see
e.g.[6]).
The local
topological
structure of the central set can be rathercomplicated
even forQ - a
Coo - smooth submanifold of R n. But if this manifoldQ
is embedded into R ngenerically,
thepathologies
canbe avoided and the local structure of
C(Q)
can be studiedby
methodsof
Singularities Theory (see [11], [2], [3]).
In some sense thestudy
ofthe
generic
central sets isequivalent
to thestudy
of the Maxwell set in the space of smooth functions([11]).
In this paper a further
topological description
of the central set of ageneric
smooth submanifold in R n isgiven.
The method used is basedon the
transversality
theorem ofLooijenga ([7],
see also[12])
and on 0010-437X/81050225-14$00.20/0the notion of a
generalized
differential of aLipschitzian function, developed
in MathematicalProgramming ([4], [5]).
Weapply
theinverse function theorem of F. Clarke
([5])
to themappings
definedby (non-smooth)
functions of type03B4(z)
= minp(z, y).
yEQ
(The
similar notions ofgeneralized
derivatives are usedby
D.Milman
[10]
tostudy
theproperties
of the central function of theboundary aG,
which associates to y E G the center z EC(aG)
of themaximal
ball, containing y).
In section 2 the
required
definitions and resultsconcerning
thegeneralized
differentials aregiven.
In section 3 we consider the central set
C(Q)
of anarbitrary
closedsubset
Q
C R n. Let03B4(z)
= minp(z, y)
denoteby B(z)
the closed ballyEQ
of radius
[03B4(z)]1/2
centered at z and letT(z)
=B(z)
rlQ.
Let03BC(z)
bethe number of
points
inT(z)
ifT(z)
is a finite set, and03BC(z) = ~
otherwise.
The structure of
C(Q)
at z EC(Q)
is determined on the one handby
theglobal
geometry of the setT(z) and,
on the otherhand, by
thecharacter of tangency of
B(z)
andQ
at eachpoint
ofT(z).
It turnsout that the
typical
model for the"global"
part ofC(Q)
at z is thecentral set of the
boundary
of aregular simplex:
Let 039403BC-1 be aregular p, -1-dimensional simplex,
c - its center. The central setC(~039403BC-1)
consists of all
li-2-simplices
formedby (li - 3)-faces
of~039403BC-1
and c. It is the cone over(li - 3)-skeleton
of a039403BC-1. Denote by
CIL the interior partC(~039403BC-1) ~ 03BC-1.
In theorem 1 the conditions ofT(z)
aregiven
under which in a
neighborhood
of z the subsetCg(z)
CC(Q)
can beselected,
such thatCg(z)
ishomeomorphic
toC03BC In-03BC+1,
whereI = (0, 1), 03BC ~ n + 1.
In sections 4 and 5 we consider the case where
Q
is a smoothsubmanifold of Rn embedded
generically (in
the sense which will be madeprecise below).
We prove that here the conditions of theorem 1are
naturally
satisfied for anyz E C (Q)
with03BC(z) ~
2 and then(theorem 2)
in aneighborhood
of any z EC(Q)
with03BC(z) ~
2 there isthe subset
Cg(z)
CC(Q), homeomorphic
toC03BC(z)
x In-03BC(z)+1.
Theorem 3 of section 5
gives
acomplete topological description
ofC(Q)
in aneighborhood
of z EC(Q),
for which the tangency ofB(z)
andQ
at anypoint
ofT(z)
is either of the firstorder,
or of the third order in one direction(the
functionp(z, .)
hasglobal
minima of types A1 or A3only).
This covers, inparticular,
all thepossibilities
forn =
2, 3,
described also in[11], [3], and, together
with the case wherep(z, .)
has theonly global
minimum of typeAs,
all thepossibilities
forn = 4.
REMARK 1: All the results of section 3 and 4 remain true also for the cut locus of a
point
in a compact Riemannian manifold with ageneric
metric. Theonly
difference is that instead of the distance function we consider the energy function on thepaths
space of this manifold and instead ofLooijenga’s
theorem use Buchner’s trans-versality
theorem([2]).
REMARK 2: The results of this paper can be extended in the
following
directions:a)
The central setC(Q)
of anarbitrary
closed setQ C R"
can bedescribed in terms of differential
properties
of the function8(z).
In thisdescription
the second ordergeneralized
differentials appear.b)
ForQ - the
closedgeneric polyhedron
in RnC(Q)
in aneighbor-
hood of any z E
C(Q)
ishomoeomorphic
tocg(z)
xIn-03BC(z)+1.
c)
The structure of the central set of ageneric
smooth manifold in R ncan be
described, using
abovemethods,
also forpoints
where morecomplicated singularities
ofp(z, .)
thenAI
andA3
arise.These results will appear
separately.
The author would like to thank Professor D.
Milman,
who focused the author’s attention to theproblems arising
in thestudy
of centralsets, and whose advice was very useful
during
the work.2. Differential
properties
ofLipschitzian
functionsWe need some results of F. Clarke
([4], [5]): Let f :
Rn ~ R msatisfy
a
Lipschitz
condition in aneighborhood
of apoint
zo E Rn. Thus forsome constant K for all zi and Z2 near zo, we have:
Let
Ln,m
be the space of linearmappings ~ : Rn - Rm.
The differentialdf (z)
ELn,m
exists almosteverywhere
near zo.DEFINITION 1: The
generalized
differential~f(z0)
is the convex hullof all e E
Ln,m
of the form ~ = limdf (zi),
where zi converges to zo andf
is differentiable at zi for each i.DEFINITION 2:
~f(z0)
is said to be of maximal rank(or
non-degenerate)
ifevery t
in~f(z0)
is of maximal rank(equal
tomin(n, m)).
Since we are
only
interested in a local behavior ofmappings,
wewill consider the germs
f : (Rn, zo) - (R m, wo).
The
following
property ofgeneralized
differentials can beeasily proved:
PROPOSITION 1:
Let f : (Rn, z0) ~ (Rm, w0)
andg : (Rm, w0) ~ (Rp, y0)
be the germs
of Lipschitzian mappings.
Then~(g f (zo)
is containedin the convex hull
of
the set~g(w0) ~f(z0) ~ Ln,p, consisting of
~2 ~1, ~1 ~ ~f(z0), ~2 ~ ~g(w0). ~
The Inverse Function Theorem
([5],
theorem1).
Let
f : (R n, zo)- (R n, wo)
be aLipschitzian
germ and leta f (zo)
benondegenerate.
Then there exists aLipschitzian
germ g :(R n, w0) ~ (R", zo),
withf g
=Id, g f
= Id. Inparticular, f
is ahomeomorphism
of some
neighborhood
of zo onto theneighborhood
ofw0. ~
The
homeomorphism f : G1 ~
G2 of open setsGi, G2
CRn, which
isLipschitzian
near eachpoint
z EGi,
and whose inversef -’
isLip-
schitzian near each w E G2, will be called an
L-homeomorphism.
We need the
following
form of theimplicit
function theorem(which
is obtained
by
usual construction from the inverse functiontheorem):
COROLLARY
1: Let f : (R n, zo) - (R m, wo),
n ~ m, be theLipschitzian
germ with
~f(z0) of
maximal rank. Then there exists a germof
anL-homeomorphism
such that the
diagram
commutes, where 7T is the
projection
on thefirst factor. ~
Now we turn to distance functions. It is convenient to consider instead of the differential of the real function its
gradient (using
thescalar
product (,)
inRn),
which will be denoted alsoby df.
Thegeneralized gradient ~f(z0)
of a realLipschitzian function f
is now aconvex set in the vector space R n.
Denote
by D
the convex hull of a set D CR n,
and let forA,
B C Rnv(A, B)
denotes the set of vectors of the form v= 2(b - a), a E A,
b E B.Let
Q
be a closed subset ofR n 8(z)
= minp(z, y)
andT(z)
asabove. yEQ
PROPOSITION 2:
([4]),
theorem2.1).
Let
z ~ Rn B Q.
Thenaâ(z)
=v((z), z).
Thefirst differential d03B4(z)
exists
if
andonly if T (z)
consistsof
onepoint.
3. The
global part
ofC(Q)
at zoLet zo E
C(Q)
and letT(zo)
be the union ofdisjoint
close nonempty subsetsTel,..., T03BC, 03BC
2: 2(then,
z E R n >Q).
We can find open setsWe
andV~, ~ = 1, ..., 03BC,
such that T~ CW~
C V~ andV~
aredisjoint.
Now define
03B4~(z)
as the distance function ofQ
flW~ : 03B4~(z) =
min p(z, y).
The germof 03B4~
at zodepends only
on T~ andQ,
but noty ~ Q ~ W~
on
We.
LEMMA 1: There exists a
neighborhood Uo of
zo such thatfor z ~ U0
PROOF:
03B4(z)
= minp(x, y)
and for z = zo this minimum is attainedyEQ
on
T(zo).
Then for zsufhciently
close to zo minp(z, y)
is attained in theneighborhood
W = UWe
ofT (zo).
HenceLet
Cg(zo) C Uo
consist ofpoints z OE Uo satisfying
one of therelations
We call
Cg(zo)
theglobal
part ofC(Q)
at Zo(with
respect to thepartition T(z0) =
UTe).
1=1
LEMMA 2:
Cg(zo)CC(Q).
Thecomplement U0 ~ C(Q) B Cg(zo) is
the
disjoint
unionof
setsC~(z0), ~
=1,...,
li, andfor
each tCe(zo)
CC(Q
nWe).
PROOF: For
z ~ Cg(z0) min 03C1(z, y) =
min03B4~(z)
is attained as twoyEQ e = g
or more different
points,
then the ballB(z)
is maximal and z EC(Q).
Now
U0 B Cg(zo)
= U Ue where Ue ={z
EU0/03B4~(z)
min03B4j(z)}
aredisjoint
open sets andclearly
Now let
2 ~ 03BC ~ n
+ 1.Suppose
that the sets Tesatisfy
the follow-ing
condition:each li points
yl, ..., y03BC, ye ETt,
are the vertices of anondegenerate simplex
in Rn. As above, CIL =C(~039403BC-1)
rl03BC-1, c -
thecenter of
039403BC-1.
THEOREM 1: There is a
neighborhood
Uof
zo such that thetriple (U, Cg(z0) ~ U, z0) is L-homeomorphic
to thetriple og-1
XIn-03BC+1,
CIL X
¡n-IL+1,
c x0). (Where I, as above, is
the interval(0, 1).)
PROOF: We shall find a
Lipschitzian
germH : (Rn, z0) ~ (039403BC-1, c)
such that(i) H-1(C03BC)
=C’g(zo)
(ii) aH (zo)
is of maximal rank.By (ii)
andcorollary
1, there exists a germ ofL-homeomorphism
such that the
diagram
commutes.
By (i)
cp mapsCg (zo)
on03C0-1(C03BC) = C03BC Rn-03BC+1.
Thisproves the theorem for germs.
Passing
torepresentatives
we obtainthe
required
form of the theorem.It remains to construct the
mapping
H. Let us consider RI’ ={(u1,..., u03BC)}
and thesimplex 039403BC-1 ~ R03BC
definedby 03A303BC~=1
ue =1,
u~ ~ 0.The central set CIL consists of
points (u1,...,u03BC) ~ 03BC-1, satisfying
one of the relations
Now define H :
(R ", zo)
-(039403BC-1, c)
asThe property
(i)
of H f ollows from(1)
and(2).
In order to prove(ii)
note that H =
h1 h,
where h :(R ", z0) ~ (R03BC, d),
LEMMA 3: Let y,, ..., y, E
T (zo)
and leth(y1,...,y03BC): (R n, z0) ~ (R03BC, d)
bedefined by h(y1,...,y03BC)(z) = (p(z, y,), ..., p(z, y03BC)).
Then thefollowing
con-ditions are
equivalent :
(a) h1 h(y1,...,y03BC): (Rn, z0) ~ (039403BC-1, c) is
a submersion(b) h(y1,..., y,): (R n, zo) ~ (R03BC, d)
is transversal to thediagonal
Dof
R IL(c)
thepoints
y1,..., y,from
anondegenerate simplex
in Rn.PROOF: Since the kernel of
dhl(d)
coincides with thediagonal
D,(a)
and(b)
areequivalent.
D is defined in R03BCby
u2 - u1 =0,...,
u03BC - Mi =0,
henceh(y1,...,
y03BC) is transversal to D if andonly
if thevectors
gradz(03C1(z ye) - 03C1(z, y1))(z0) = 2(zo - ye) - 2(zo - y1) = -2(y~ - y 1),
~ =
1,...,
1£, arelinearly independent,
and this isequivalent
to(c).
Il Nowby proposition
1,aH(zo)
is contained in the convex hull ofahl(d) 0 ah(zo),
which coincides withdhl(d) 0 ah(zo),
sincedhl(d)
isthe usual differential.
By proposition
2any e
Eah(zd)
is of the form~ =
dh(y1,..., y03BC)(z0),
where Yi ETe, f
= 1, ..., p,.By
condition of the theorem yi, ..., y03BC form anondegenerated simplex
and henceby
lemma 3 all the elements of
aH (zo)
are of maximal rank. ~COROLLARY 2:
Suppose
thatfor
zo EC(Q)
the setT(zo)
can bedecomposed
into the unionof
two nonempty closed subsetsTi
and T2 with1 ~ 2 = 0.
Thenfor
someneighborhood
Uof
zo andCg (zo) -
theglobal
partof C(Q)
at zo with respect to thepartition T(z0) =
Tl U T2 - the
triple (U, Cg(zo) rl U, zo) is L-homeomorphic to
thetriple (Dn, D’-’, 0)
where Dq is an open unitq-dimensional
disk centered at 0.PROOF: Since any two different
points
y h y2 in Rn form a non-degenerated 1-simplex,
conditions of theorem 1 are satisfied with IL =2, T(z0) =
Ti U T2. Then4. The
global
part of the central set of ageneric
submanifold Theprecise
definitions of the notions used in this and thefollowing section,
can be found e.g. in[1], [12].
Let M be a compact smooth
(COO)
k-dimensionalmanifold,
k Sn - 1. The space of
embeddings
of M intoR n, Emb(M, Rn),
will be considered with theWhitney topology.
A set inEmb(M, Rn)
contain-ing
a countable intersection of dense open sets is called a residual set.The residual set in
Emb(M, Rn)
is dense.Let J"
(M, R)
be the space ofr-jets
of smooth real functions on M and,J’(M,R)-the
space ofs-multijets.
Forsmooth 03C8: M ~ R
letJr(03C8): M ~ Jr(M, R)
andsJr(03C8) : M(s) ~ sJr(M, R)
be thejet
and s-multijet
extensions of03C8.
Let i : M ~ Rn be the
embedding.
The distance function p can nowbe defined on
M : 03C1i(z, x) = {(i(x) - z|2, z ~ Rn,
x E M. Asshown in
[9]
the central setC(i)
=C(i(M))
coincides with the cut locus ofi,
defined in[11]
as the setconsisting
of z E R n for which03C1i(z, ·) : M ~ R
has either at least twoequal global
minima or onedegenerated global
minimum.Let
b’
be themultijet
extension with respect to x ofpi(Z, x):
The
Transversality
Theorem.([7],
see also[12],
theoremB).
For any submanifold W of
sJr(M, R),
invariant under addition of constants, the set ofembeddings
i : M ~ Rn withis transversal
toW,
is residual.Invariance here means that for any
(~1,...,~s) ~ W
and c E R,(~1 + c,...,~s + c) ~ W. ~
Now fix some r ~ 0 and let
Ws ~ sJr(M, R)
be the submanifoldconsisting
ofmultijets (~1,...,~s)
with theequal
values~1 = ~2 =
...
~s (~
E R denotes the target of thejet
~E Jr(M, R)). By
thetransversality
theorem the set ofembeddings
i : M ~ Rn withis
transversal to
Ws, s
= 1,..., n +2,
is residual.These
embeddings
will be calledgeneric
in this section.PROPOSITION 3: Let i : M ~ Rn be a
generic embedding.
Thenf or
each z E
C(i)
thepoints of T(z)
are the verticesof a non-degenerated simplex in
R n. Inparticular, 03BC(z) ~ n
+ 1.PROOF: Let
ZoeC(t)
and lety01,...,y0s ~ T(z0), Y0~ = i(x0~),
s ~n + 2. The
multijet is((x01,..., x0s)
xzo)
ESJ r(M, R) belongs
to Ws. Thismanifold is defined in
sJr(M, R) by ~1 = ··· = ~s
and since the target~~
ofis((x1,..., xs)xz)
isequal
top’(z, x~),
thetransversality
ofis
toWs S is
equivalent
to thetransversality
of themapping : M(s) Rn ~ Rs, ((x1,..., Xs)
xz) = (p’(z, xi),..., p’(z, xs))
to thediagonal
D of Rs.Now
d = (dx1,,...,dxs, dz)
and sincex01,...,x0s
are minima of03C1i(z0, ·)
on M,dx~ = 0
at(x01,...,x0s) z0,
~ = 1, ..., s. Hencedz : Rn ~ Rs
is transversal toD,
and sincedzh((x01,...,x0s) z0) = dh(y01,..,y0s)(z0), by
lemma 3 thepoints y°, ..., y0s
form anondegenerated simplex
in Rn. This is true for any s ~ n + 2points
ofT(zo),
therefore all thepoints
ofT(zo)
are the vertices of anondegenerated simplex
and their number
03BC(z)
~ n + 1..Now for z E
C(i)
with03BC(z) ~ 2
we can define the naturalpartition T(z)
={y1}
U ... U|y03BC(z)}, satisfying
conditions of theorem 1 and theglobal
partCg(z)
with respect to thispartition.
Thus we haveTHEOREM 2: Let i : M ~ Rn be the
generic embedding,
z EC(i)
and03BC(z) = 03BC ~ 2.
LetCg(z)
be theglobal
partof C(i) at
z. Then thereexists a
neighborhood
Uof
z such that thetriple (U, Cg(z) ~
u,z) is L-homeomorphic
to thetriple (03BC-1
x1 n-IL+I,
C" xIn-03BC+1,
c x0)..
5. The
points
of typeC03BCp
Let 03C8 : (Rm, x) ~ (R, c)
be the germ of a smooth function. This germ has a minimum of type Ai(A3)
at je is in some coordinate system(u1,..., Um)
at x E R m thefunction 03C8
can be written as03C8(u1,..., um) = c + u21 + u22 + ·· · + u2m(03C8(u1,...,um) = c + u41 + u22 + ·· · + u2m,
respec-tively).
The minimum
Ai (or nondegenerate)
of03C1(z, ·)
at XoEM cor-responds
to the first order tangency ofi(M)
andB(z)
at yo =i(x0),
andthe
A3-minimum
to the tangency, which is of the third order in onedirection.
Let us fix some r ~ 4 and let
Wsp
be the submanifold ofsJ’(M, R) consisting
ofmultijets (~1,..., ~s)
such that~1 = ··· = ijs,
some p ofjets
~1,..., l1s are the minima of type A3 and the rest of typeAi.
The set of
embeddings
r M ~ Rn withis transversal
toWp,
1 :5 s :5n +
2,
0 ~ p :5 s, isresidual,
and theseembeddings
will be calledgeneric.
SinceWsp
CWS, they
will begeneric
also in the sense ofsection 4.
Now let us define the subset
C03BCp
ofI2p
x03BC-1
as follows: considerR2P
with the coordinates XI, x2, ... , x2p-1, x2p and the cubeI2p : |xj| 1 2,
j=l,...,2p.
Let CIL C
03BC-1
be as above. Thecomplement 03BC-1 B
CIL is thedisjoint
union UUi,
whereU~
is defined in coordinates Mi,..., u03BCon
03BC-1 by
ue min Uj. LetC03BCp
be the subsetin I2p X Ow-’.
For
example,
C03BC0 =CIL, C21
is theplane
with the attachedrectangle
inI3, Ci
is thehalf-segment,
and so on(Figure 1).
THEOREM 3: Let i : M ~ Rn be the
generic embedding.
Let zo EC(i), p, = p, (zo), T(z0) = {y01,...y003BC}, y0~ = i(x0~). Suppose
that thefunction 03C1i(z0, ·)
has the A3-minimum atx01,...,x0p
and theA,-minimum
atx0p+1,
...,x003BC.
Then2p + 03BC -1 ~ n
andf or
someneighborhood
Uof
Zo thequadruple (U, C(i) ~ U, Cg(z0) ~ U, z0) is L-homeomorphic
to(I2p 03BC-1
xIq, C03BCp
xIq,
I2p x C03BC xIq,
0 x c xo),
where q =n - 2p - 03BC + 1.
PROOF: Let é = 1,..., p. Consider the function
03C1i(z, x)
for z near Zo and x nearx0~
as the déformation of the germ of03C1i(z0, ·)
atx0~.
Thisdeformation can be induced from the universal one.
Precisely
thismeans the
following (see
e.g.[1], §14):
letft1,t2(Rk, 0) ~ (R, 0)
bedefined
by
Then there exist
(i)
two smooth functionstU-1(z)
andtU(z)
defined in someneigh-
borhood N~ of zo,
tU-1(z0)
=tu(zo)
=0,
(ii)
the smoothfamily
ofdiffeomorphisms cpz, zEN (,
of someneighborhood V~ of x0~
in M on aneighborhood
of 0 ER k,
(iii)
the smooth functiona(z),
defined inNe,
such that for any z E NeChoosing
thisrepresentation
for each ~ = 1, ..., p, we define in someneighborhood Uo
of zo the smooth functions ti, t2, ..., Y2p-1,t2p.
Let
: (Rn, z0) ~ (R2p R03BC)
be definedby
As in the
proof
ofproposition
3 above it can beeasily
shown that thetransversality
ofi03BC
toW03BCp
at(x01,...,x003BC) z0
isequivalent
to thetransversality of h
at Zo to the submanifold0 D ~ R2p R03BC.
Now let
6i(z),..., 03B403BC(z) be,
as in section3,
the distance functions with respect to thepartition T(z0)
={y01}
U ...U{y003BC}: 5e(z) =
min
p’(z, x),
where V~ is asufficiently
smallneighborhood
ofx0~
in M.x ~ V~
LEMMA 4: In a
neighborhood of
Zo the central setC(i)
consistsof
z,satisfying
at least oneof
thefollowing
relations :PROOF: Let z be near zo. z E
Cg(zo)
CC(i)
if andonly
if it satisfiesone of the conditions
(a~j).
Ifze Cg(zo) then,
for somet, 5e(z) min 5j(z). By
lemma1, min 03C11(z, x) = 03B4~(z)
is attained in aneighbor-
jot x ~ M
hood of
x0~.
Nowif ~ > p,
the minimum of03C1i(z0, ·)
atx0~
is non-degenerate,
hence also the minimum of03C1i(z, .)
nearx0~
isunique
andnondegenerate,
i.e.z§É C(1). If ~ ~ p,
from therepresentation (3)
ofp’(z, x)
we see that z EC(i)
if andonly
if the functionftU-1.tU
haseither two
equal
minima or onedegenerated minimum,
e.g. tU-1 =0,
tU ~ 0. ·
Now define the
Lipschitzian mapping H : (Rn, z0) ~
(R2p 0394u-1, 0 c) by
LEMMA 5:
(ii)
thegeneralized differential aH(zo)
isof
maximal rank.PROOF:
(i)
follows from the definition ofCp
and lemma 4. To prove(ii)
note that as in theproof
of theorem 1, H =h20 h,
whereh2
= Id xh 1,
whereh1
as in lemma 3.Now the minimum of
p’(zo, .)
in aneighborhood
ofx)
is attained atonly point x0~,
thenby proposition 2,
thegeneralized gradient ~03B4~(z0) = 2(zo - y0~) = dz 03C1i(z, xé)(zo).
Then thegeneralized
differential~h(z0)
consists of the
only
linearmapping t equal
to the differential ofh
at zo. Sinceh
is transversal to 0 x D at zo,(ii)
follows from lemma 3 andproposition
1. ·The rest of the
proof
of theorem 3 follows as in theorem l. · REMARK:Actually
theL-homeomorphism
constructed in theorem 3 is once differentiable at zo(but
not at nearpoints).
COROLLARY:
If for
z EC (i)
the tangencyof B (z)
andi (M)
at eachpoint of T(z)
isof
thefirst order,
thenC(i)
is aneighborhood of
zcoincides with its
global
partCg(z)
~C03BC(z)
XIn-03BC(z)+1.
Since the
singularity C03BCp
ofC(i)
arisesgenerically only
for n *2p
+ 03BC - 1, we can describe all thepossible generic
local types ofC(i)
for small dimension n.THEOREM 4: For n =
2, 3, 4
and i : M - R n ageneric embedding,
thecentral set
C(i)
at any z EC(i)
has oneof
thefollowing
types(in
thesense
of
theorem3):
Here C
corresponds
to theonly global
minimum ofp’(z, .)
of typeA5. At such a
point C(i)
coincides with the Maxwell set in the base of the universal deformation of thesingularity A5 (see
e.g.[1], § 17).
REFERENCES
[1] TH. BRÖCKER and L. LANDER: Differentiable germs and catastrophes. London
Math. Society Lect. Notes series, 17. Cambridge University Press, 1975.
[2] M. BUCHNER: Stability of the cut locus in dimensions less than or equal to six.
Inventiones Math., 43 (1977) 199-231.
[3] M. BUCHNER: The structure of the cut locus in dimension less than or equal to
six. Compositio Math., 37, 1 (1978) 103-119.
[4] F.H. CLARKE: Generalized gradients and applications. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 205 (1975) 247-262.
[5] F.H. CLARKE: On the inverse function theorem. Pacific J. Math., 64 (1976) 97-102.
[6] R. O. DUDA and P.E. HART: Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis. Wiley,
1973.
[7] E.J.N. LOOIJENGA: Structural stability of smooth families of C~-functions. Doc- toral thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam, 1974.
[8] D. MILMAN: Eine geometrische Ungleihung und ihre Anvendung (Die zentrale Menge des Gebites und die Erkennung des Gebites durch sie). In "General
Inequalities", v. 2., edited by E.F. Beckenbach (to appear).
[9] D. MILMAN and Z. WAKSMAN: On topological properties of the central set of a
bounded domain in Rm (to appear).
[10] D. MILMAN: The central function of the boundary of a domain and its differenti- able properties (to appear).
[11] R. THOM: Sur le cut-locus d’une varieté plongée. J. Diff. Geom., 6 (1972) 577-586.
[12] C.T.C. WALL: Geometric properties of generic differentiable manifolds: in
"Geometry and Topology", Proceeding of the III Latin American School of Mathematics, Rio de Janero, 1976, Lecture Notes in Math., 597, 707-774.
(Oblatum 22-1-1980 & 9-X-1980) Ben Gurion University
of the Negev Beer-Sheva, Israel