• Aucun résultat trouvé

Small does not mean young: Age estimation of severely browsed trees in anthropogenic Mediterranean landscapes

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Small does not mean young: Age estimation of severely browsed trees in anthropogenic Mediterranean landscapes"

Copied!
7
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Supplementary material Figure S1. Study area and global distribution of Z. abelicea throughout the four main mountain regions of Crete: from west to east: Levka Ori (2453 m a.s.l.), Ida Mountains (2456 m a.s.l.), Dhikti Mountains (2148 m a.s.l.) and Thripiti Mountains (1476 m a.s.l.) (Jahn and Schönfelder, 1995). Dots represent sampling sites and colored zones show the species’ distribution in the Levka Ori Mountains and Dhikti Mountains. For the Ida Mountains, sampling was done within the two only existing populations (KED and PSI). This was also the case in the Thripiti Mountains where the only known population (STA) was sampled.

(2)

Fig. S2.Z. abelicea individual of the large category witha fully developed crown, not subject to browsing anymore (AMB2_L1).

Supplementary material

(3)

Fig. S3. Shrubby, dwarfed and totally browsedZ. abelicea tree of the small category (KED_S1).

(4)

Fig. S4. Z. abelicea individual of the intermediate category. The tree is browsed at its base but the highest branches have started to escape browsing (LAS2_M1).

(5)

Table S1 Main geographical parameters of sampling sites, number of sampled trees in each habit category and observation of fruiting trees in 2010. S, M and L stand for the three tree categories, namely small, dwarfed and browsed trees, intermediate trees and large, non-browsed and normally growing trees. Only large trees have been observed and known to produce fruit. Population IDSite name Mountain regionLatitude (°N) Longitude (°E) Altitude (m) SMLTotal NFruiting observed AMB1Ambelitsias Potamos Levka Ori35°21'60’’23°59'10’’1 2693339yes AMB2Ambelitsias Potamos Levka Ori35°21'17’’23°58'50’’1 4292136yes ELIEligas Gorge Levka Ori35°15'36’’24°00'55’’1 5913014no NIANiato Levka Ori35°17'16’’24°08'49’’1 2264206no OMA1 Omalos Levka Ori35°18'56’’23°54'43’’1 223 3339yes OMA2 Omalos Levka Ori35°18'37’’23°54'11’’1 231 3339yes OMA3Omalos Levka Ori35°20'52’’23°54'45’’1 0432136no OMA4Omalos Levka Ori35°20'44’’23°54'40’’1 0501113no KEDMt. Kedros Psiloritis35°11'15’’24°37'41’’1 280 3339yes PSIRouvras Forest Psiloritis35°10'45’’24°55'46’’1 335 33410 yes LAS1KefalaDhikti 35°10'10’’25°32'16’’1 195 4239yes LAS2Mt. DhiktiDhikti 35°08'14’’25°30'48’’1 3741225no LAS3Mt. DhiktiDhikti 35°08'17’’25°30'48’’1 3735005no STAAfendis Kavousi Thripiti 35°04'50’’25°53'14’’1 145 8109no Total N 45 25 29 99

(6)

Supplementary material Table S2 Characteristics of cored trees and their estimated age (only trees which were possible to age are represented (N = 96)). Population IDTree IDCircum- ference (cm)*

Radius (cm)Tree height (cm) Mean ring growth rate (mm)

Estimated age** AMB1AMB1_S1 193.02450.14292212 AMB1_S2 284.461600.21313209 AMB1_S3 365.731700.12625454 AMB1_M1 203.182500.24063132*** AMB1_M2 284.464000.28500156*** AMB1_M3 304.774300.24104198 AMB1_L1 518.125311.1062573 AMB1_L2 6410.198051.6175063 AMB1_L3 518.128780.80083101 AMB2AMB2_S2 233.661500.18417199 AMB2_S3 7011.142500.36875302 AMB2_M2 436.844170.45042152 AMB2_L1 10616.877701.14250148 AMB2_L2 13421.3310142.07375103 AMB2_L3 8413.376000.67438198 ELIELI_S1 45 7.16 1060.15667457 ELI_S2 345.411060.17917302 ELI_S3 406.371220.19750322 ELI_L1 6810.825500.30000361 NIANIA_S1 33 5.25 130 0.16167 325 NIA_S2 223.50650.16883207 NIA_S3 487.641400.22694337 NIA_S4 213.342000.33208101 NIA_M1 579.073500.38750 234 NIA_M2 589.233500.27250 339 OMA1OMA1_S1 37 5.89 55 0.27354215 OMA1_S2 223.501400.32000109 OMA1_S3 213.341800.4625072 OMA1_M1 274.304370.6950062 OMA1_M2 223.503700.32083109 OMA1_M3 264.143600.5368877 OMA1_L1 23036.6110112.36167155 OMA1_L3 14022.2811651.81833123 OMA2OMA2_S1 60 9.55 180 0.19250 496*** OMA2_S2 406.371500.22500283 OMA2_S3 6310.031600.15500647 OMA2_M1 223.504000.5662562 OMA2_M2 142.233200.4137554*** OMA2_M3 304.773600.29792160 OMA2_L1 7011.146951.8475060 OMA2_L2 629.877823.4912528 OMA2_L3 13922.1212061.84917120 OMA3OMA3_S1 29 4.62 130 0.35810 129 OMA3_S2 101.591100.13500118 OMA3_M1 182.864400.3341786 OMA3_L1 6410.198051.5862564 OMA3_L2 426.687821.5237544 OMA3_L3 193.024700.6527146 OMA4OMA4_S1 24 3.82 910.16450232 OMA4_M1 19 3.02 4001.0320829 OMA4_L1 54 8.59 7351.8680646

(7)

KEDKED_S1 39 6.21 1400.48854127 KED_S2 42 6.68 1000.17000393 KED_S3 23 3.66 1300.14667250 KED_M1 85 13.535500.50167270 KED_M2 62 9.87 6950.44333223 KED_L1 123 19.587140.77167254 KED_L2 200 31.836421.40500227 KED_L3 115 18.307001.33958137 PSIPSI_S1 304.771700.19583244 PSI_S2 213.34600.17833187 PSI_S3 264.141850.27500150 PSI_M1 365.733500.21375268 PSI_M2 579.072300.24333373 PSI_M3 213.343300.4037583 PSI_L1 233.663500.4370884 PSI_L2 7311.625500.22625514 PSI_L3 589.234720.61278151 PSI_L4 9414.966300.75667198 LAS1 LAS1_S1345.411000.15783343 LAS1_S2 182.861300.26167109 LAS1_S3 253.982000.32063124 LAS1_S4 416.531300.24229269 LAS1_M1 193.023400.3693882 LAS1_M2 213.343200.4450075 LAS1_L1 294.625500.8137557 LAS1_L2 6510.355761.1425091 LAS1_L3 426.686301.1068860 LAS2LAS2_M1 152.39 2200.16208147 LAS2_M2 193.02 3000.22917132 LAS2_L1 162.55 3800.9404227 LAS2_L2 162.55 3400.3246378 LAS3LAS3_S1 132.07 800.2850073 LAS3_S2 101.59 300.2618861 LAS3_S3 121.91 800.3200060 LAS3_S4 193.02 1200.24800122 LAS3_S5 172.71 1300.3800071 STASTA_S1 203.18 1800.3508391 STA_S2 264.14 2100.15000276 STA_S3 416.53 1000.14667445 STA_S4 274.30 1300.12833335 STA_S5 274.30 1400.15300281 STA_S6 203.18 1450.24000133 STA_S7 325.09 1350.21688235 STA_S8 132.07 600.4175050 STA_M1 132.07 2400.3875053

* circumference measured at trunk base for small (S) trees and at breast height for intermediate (M) and large (L) trees ** estimated age at height of circumference measurement *** visible multiple piths

Références

Documents relatifs

* Origin of samples (NP natural population, CC clone collection); ** Available voucher specimens (S silica-gel dried leaves, C clone collection, N no

Since there are no binary trees with an even number of vertices, it would perhaps be useful to consider inead binary trees with k leaves (a leaf being a vertex without a

In this study, we used the Tertiary relict tree Zelkova abelicea (Ulmaceae), endemic to the mountains of Crete, Greece (Søndergaard and Egli, 2006), as a model organism to search for

Our investigation treats the average number of transversals of fixed size, the size of a random transversal as well as the probability that a random subset of the vertex set of a

(h) Indeterminate orthotropic monopodia with determi- nate plagiotropic branches attached rhythmically and relaying terminally or zonally.. We have a list of 30 rules which seem to

Therefore, besides their specific vulnerability to summer embolism, species having large conduits will have an additional sensitivity to winter cavitation: under the same water

Consequences are the interpretation of the reduced bar construction of operads of Ginzburg and Kapranov as the Koszul complex of this category, and the interpretation of operads up

The use of simulations enabled teasing apart the relative importance of species richness, species dominance and species functional traits, and demonstrated that only when minimizing